Capitan Silver Intersects 935 g/t Silver Equivalent over 1.3 Metres, Within a Wider Zone of 157 g/t Silver Equivalent over 20.0 Metres at the Cruz De Plata Project
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Capitan Silver Corp.
- Ticker
- CAPT
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Durango, Mexico
- Primary commodity
- Silver
- Secondary commodities
- Gold, Lead, Zinc
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-17 15:01:35 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Capitan Silver reported high-grade drill results from its Cruz de Plata silver-gold project in Durango, Mexico, including 934.6 g/t silver equivalent over 1.3 meters within a wider zone of 157.3 g/t silver equivalent over 20.0 meters in hole 26-ERDD-08. The 2026 drill program, which has completed 66 holes, aims to expand high-grade silver mineralization at depth along the Jesus Maria Silver Trend and has identified new high-grade zones, extending mineralization 150m deeper than previously announced.
Reasoning: The drill results show exceptional silver equivalent grades, particularly the 934.6 g/t AgEq over 1.3m, which is a bonanza intercept. The program successfully extended mineralization at depth and along strike, indicating significant growth potential for the Jesus Maria Silver Trend. The disclosure of detailed QA/QC procedures and metal equivalent assumptions adds to the confidence in the results.
Positive factors
- High-grade silver equivalent intercepts, including bonanza grades
- Extension of mineralization along strike and down-dip
- Discovery of new high-grade zones at depth
- Strong silver content in AgEq, indicating primary silver nature
- Comprehensive QA/QC disclosure and certified labs
Negative factors
- True widths are estimated, not precisely stated for all intercepts
Facts used in scoring: 574
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 574. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (574)
26-ERDD-05Cruz de PlataIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-05
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 81.4 m
- To
- 82.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 81.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-05:81.4-82.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 827
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional silver equivalent grade of 827 g/t over 1.4m, indicating a high-value intercept and extending mineralization down-dip.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade silver equivalent
- Good width for high grade
- Extends mineralization down-dip
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“827.00”
Context: 1.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-05Cruz de PlataIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-05
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 144.4 m
- To
- 145.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 144.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-05:144.4-145.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 48.88
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver equivalent grade of 48.88 g/t over 1.5m, above the weak threshold but not significant.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“48.88”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-05Cruz de PlataIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-05
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 207.6 m
- To
- 211.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 207.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-05:207.6-211.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 103.28
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver equivalent grade of 103.28 g/t over 4.0m, meeting the moderate threshold.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“103.28”
Context: 4.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-05Cruz de PlataIntercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-05
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 216.6 m
- To
- 225.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 216.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-05:216.6-225.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 43.29
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver equivalent grade of 43.29 g/t over 9.0m, above the weak threshold but not significant.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“43.29”
Context: 9.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-05Cruz de PlataIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-05
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 296 m
- To
- 297.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 296 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-05:296-297.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 39.61
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver equivalent grade of 39.61 g/t over 1.3m, above the weak threshold but not significant.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“39.61”
Context: 1.3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-05Cruz de PlataIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-05
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 305 m
- To
- 307 m
- Intercept Depth
- 305 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-05:305-307
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 52.14
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver equivalent grade of 52.14 g/t over 2.0m, above the weak threshold but not significant.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“52.14”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-05Cruz de PlataIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-05
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 346 m
- To
- 347.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 346 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-05:346-347.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 254.65
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong silver equivalent grade of 254.65 g/t over 1.1m, indicating a high-value intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“254.65”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-07Cruz de PlataIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-07
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 8 m
- To
- 10 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-07:8-10
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 48.99
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver equivalent grade of 48.99 g/t over 2.0m, above the weak threshold but not significant.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“48.99”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-07Cruz de PlataIntercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-07
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 18 m
- To
- 27 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-07:18-27
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 213.48
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong silver equivalent grade of 213.48 g/t over 9.0m, indicating a significant intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade
- Good intercept length
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“213.48”
Context: 9.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-07Cruz de PlataIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-07
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 21.4 m
- To
- 22.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-07:21.4-22.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 257.42
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong silver equivalent grade of 257.42 g/t over 1.0m, indicating a high-value intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“257.42”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-07Cruz de PlataIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-07
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 22.4 m
- To
- 23.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-07:22.4-23.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 585.91
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional silver equivalent grade of 585.91 g/t over 1.1m, indicating a high-value intercept.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade silver equivalent
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“585.91”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-07Cruz de PlataIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-07
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- From
- 23.5 m
- To
- 25.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-07:23.5-25.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 468.07
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong silver equivalent grade of 468.07 g/t over 1.6m, indicating a high-value intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“468.07”
Context: 1.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-07Cruz de PlataIntercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-07
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- From
- 25.1 m
- To
- 27 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-07:25.1-27
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 101.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver equivalent grade of 101.20 g/t over 1.9m, meeting the moderate threshold.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“101.20”
Context: 1.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-07Cruz de PlataIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-07
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 31.3 m
- To
- 33.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 31.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-07:31.3-33.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 188.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver equivalent grade of 188.60 g/t over 2.0m, approaching the strong threshold.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“188.60”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-07Cruz de PlataIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-07
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 38 m
- To
- 40 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-07:38-40
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 30.53
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver equivalent grade of 30.53 g/t over 2.0m, just above the weak threshold.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“30.53”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-07Cruz de PlataIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-07
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 65.5 m
- To
- 66.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 65.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-07:65.5-66.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 29.32
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver equivalent grade of 29.32 g/t over 1.0m, below the weak threshold, indicating a sub-economic intercept.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“29.32”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-07Cruz de PlataIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-07
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 70 m
- To
- 71 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-07:70-71
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 60.18
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver equivalent grade of 60.18 g/t over 1.0m, above the weak threshold but not significant.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“60.18”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-07Cruz de PlataIntercept: 20.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-07
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 20.7 m
- From
- 115.5 m
- To
- 136.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 115.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-07:115.5-136.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 76.48
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver equivalent grade of 76.48 g/t over a significant width of 20.7m, indicating potential for bulk tonnage.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“76.48”
Context: 20.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-07Cruz de PlataIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-07
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 116.5 m
- To
- 117.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 116.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-07:116.5-117.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 113.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver equivalent grade of 113.80 g/t over 1.0m, meeting the moderate threshold.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“113.80”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-07Cruz de PlataIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-07
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 119.2 m
- To
- 120.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 119.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-07:119.2-120.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 133.63
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver equivalent grade of 133.63 g/t over 1.0m, meeting the moderate threshold.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“133.63”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-07Cruz de PlataIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-07
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 121.7 m
- To
- 122.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 121.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-07:121.7-122.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 100.53
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver equivalent grade of 100.53 g/t over 1.0m, meeting the moderate threshold.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“100.53”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-07Cruz de PlataIntercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-07
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 128 m
- To
- 130.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 128 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-07:128-130.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 96.41
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver equivalent grade of 96.41 g/t over 2.5m, below the moderate threshold.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“96.41”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-07Cruz de PlataIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-07
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 132 m
- To
- 134 m
- Intercept Depth
- 132 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-07:132-134
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 191.67
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver equivalent grade of 191.67 g/t over 2.0m, approaching the strong threshold.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“191.67”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-07Cruz de PlataIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-07
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 191 m
- To
- 193 m
- Intercept Depth
- 191 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-07:191-193
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 36.18
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver equivalent grade of 36.18 g/t over 2.0m, above the weak threshold but not significant.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“36.18”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-07Cruz de PlataIntercept: 5.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-07
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- From
- 201 m
- To
- 206.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 201 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-07:201-206.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 125.76
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver equivalent grade of 125.76 g/t over 5.3m, meeting the moderate threshold.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“125.76”
Context: 5.3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-07Cruz de PlataIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-07
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 201 m
- To
- 202 m
- Intercept Depth
- 201 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-07:201-202
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 563.72
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional silver equivalent grade of 563.72 g/t over 1.0m, indicating a high-value intercept.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade silver equivalent
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“563.72”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-07Cruz de PlataIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-07
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 210.3 m
- To
- 211.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 210.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-07:210.3-211.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 258.85
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong silver equivalent grade of 258.85 g/t over 1.0m, indicating a high-value intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“258.85”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-08Cruz de PlataIntercept: 4.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-08
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 57.3 m
- To
- 62 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-08:57.3-62
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 32
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver equivalent grade of 32.00 g/t over 4.7m, above the weak threshold but not significant.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“32.00”
Context: 4.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-08Cruz de PlataIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-08
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 66 m
- To
- 69 m
- Intercept Depth
- 66 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-08:66-69
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 30.87
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver equivalent grade of 30.87 g/t over 3.0m, above the weak threshold but not significant.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“30.87”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-08Cruz de PlataIntercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-08
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 172 m
- To
- 192 m
- Intercept Depth
- 172 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-08:172-192
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 157.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver equivalent grade of 157.35 g/t over a significant width of 20.0m, contributing to the extension of mineralization at depth.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade silver equivalent
- Strong intercept length
- Extends mineralization at depth
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“157.35”
Context: 20.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-08Cruz de PlataIntercept: 2.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-08
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 2.3 m
- From
- 174.7 m
- To
- 177 m
- Intercept Depth
- 174.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-08:174.7-177
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 182.59
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver equivalent grade of 182.59 g/t over 2.3m, approaching the strong threshold.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“182.59”
Context: 2.3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-08Cruz de PlataIntercept: 5.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-08
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 5.2 m
- From
- 178.4 m
- To
- 183.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 178.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-08:178.4-183.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 376.37
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong silver equivalent grade of 376.37 g/t over 5.2m, indicating a high-value intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“376.37”
Context: 5.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-08Cruz de PlataIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-08
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 178.4 m
- To
- 179.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 178.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-08:178.4-179.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 934.62
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional silver equivalent grade of 934.62 g/t over 1.3m, significantly above the bonanza threshold, extending mineralization at depth.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade silver equivalent
- High-grade intercept
- Extends mineralization at depth
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“934.62”
Context: 1.3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERDD-08Cruz de PlataIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERDD-08
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 187 m
- To
- 189 m
- Intercept Depth
- 187 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERDD-08:187-189
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (west of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 136.68
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver equivalent grade of 136.68 g/t over 2.0m, meeting the moderate threshold.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“136.68”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERRC-53Cruz de PlataIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERRC-53
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 6.1 m
- To
- 9.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERRC-53:6.1-9.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (east of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 33.51
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver equivalent grade of 33.51 g/t over 3.0m, above the weak threshold but not significant.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“33.51”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERRC-53Cruz de PlataIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERRC-53
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 103.6 m
- To
- 105.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 103.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERRC-53:103.6-105.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (east of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 425.39
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong silver equivalent grade of 425.39 g/t over 1.5m, indicating a high-value intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“425.39”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERRC-53Cruz de PlataIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERRC-53
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 123.4 m
- To
- 131.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 123.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERRC-53:123.4-131.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (east of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 30.73
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver equivalent grade of 30.73 g/t over 7.6m, above the weak threshold but not significant.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“30.73”
Context: 7.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERRC-53Cruz de PlataIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERRC-53
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 153.9 m
- To
- 155.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 153.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERRC-53:153.9-155.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (east of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 101.57
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver equivalent grade of 101.57 g/t over 1.5m, meeting the moderate threshold.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“101.57”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERRC-53Cruz de PlataIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERRC-53
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 175.3 m
- To
- 176.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 175.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERRC-53:175.3-176.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (east of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 53.57
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver equivalent grade of 53.57 g/t over 1.5m, above the weak threshold but not significant.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“53.57”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERRC-53Cruz de PlataIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERRC-53
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 233.2 m
- To
- 236.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 233.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERRC-53:233.2-236.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (east of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 67.57
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver equivalent grade of 67.57 g/t over 3.0m, above the weak threshold but not significant.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“67.57”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERRC-54Cruz de PlataIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERRC-54
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 18.3 m
- To
- 24.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERRC-54:18.3-24.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (east of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 59.05
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver equivalent grade of 59.05 g/t over 6.1m, above the weak threshold but not significant.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“59.05”
Context: 6.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERRC-54Cruz de PlataIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERRC-54
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 22.9 m
- To
- 24.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERRC-54:22.9-24.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (east of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 136.13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver equivalent grade of 136.13 g/t over 1.5m, meeting the moderate threshold.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“136.13”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERRC-54Cruz de PlataIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERRC-54
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 30.5 m
- To
- 32 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERRC-54:30.5-32
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (east of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 97.12
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver equivalent grade of 97.12 g/t over 1.5m, below the moderate threshold.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“97.12”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERRC-54Cruz de PlataIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERRC-54
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 70.1 m
- To
- 77.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERRC-54:70.1-77.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (east of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 51.75
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver equivalent grade of 51.75 g/t over 7.6m, above the weak threshold but not significant.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“51.75”
Context: 7.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERRC-54Cruz de PlataIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERRC-54
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 76.2 m
- To
- 77.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 76.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERRC-54:76.2-77.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (east of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 101.46
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver equivalent grade of 101.46 g/t over 1.5m, meeting the moderate threshold.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“101.46”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERRC-54Cruz de PlataIntercept: 16.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERRC-54
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 16.8 m
- From
- 86.9 m
- To
- 103.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 86.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERRC-54:86.9-103.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (east of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 45.74
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver equivalent grade of 45.74 g/t over a significant width of 16.8m, indicating potential for bulk tonnage.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“45.74”
Context: 16.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERRC-54Cruz de PlataIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERRC-54
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 93 m
- To
- 94.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 93 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERRC-54:93-94.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (east of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 94.87
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver equivalent grade of 94.87 g/t over 1.5m, below the moderate threshold.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“94.87”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERRC-54Cruz de PlataIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERRC-54
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 97.5 m
- To
- 99.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 97.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERRC-54:97.5-99.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (east of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 130.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver equivalent grade of 130.26 g/t over 1.5m, meeting the moderate threshold.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“130.26”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERRC-55Cruz de PlataIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERRC-55
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 15.2 m
- To
- 16.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 15.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERRC-55:15.2-16.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (east of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 43.67
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver equivalent grade of 43.67 g/t over 1.5m, above the weak threshold but not significant.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“43.67”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
26-ERRC-55Cruz de PlataIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26-ERRC-55
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 48.8 m
- To
- 54.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 48.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26-ERRC-55:48.8-54.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Jesus Maria Silver Trend (east of the Peñoles Fault)
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 81.95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver equivalent grade of 81.95 g/t over 6.1m, below the moderate threshold.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“81.95”
Context: 6.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 850Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 850
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 81.4 m
- To
- 82.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 81.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:81.4-82.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 827
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 850 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“850.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.153Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.153
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 81.4 m
- To
- 82.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 81.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:81.4-82.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 827
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.153 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.153”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.274Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.274
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 81.4 m
- To
- 82.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 81.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:81.4-82.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 827
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.274 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.274 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.274”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.288Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.288
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 81.4 m
- To
- 82.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 81.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:81.4-82.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 827
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.288 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.288 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.288”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 40Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 40
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 144.4 m
- To
- 145.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 144.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:144.4-145.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 48.88
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 40 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“40.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.153Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.153
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 144.4 m
- To
- 145.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 144.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:144.4-145.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 48.88
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.153 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.153”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.007Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.007
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 144.4 m
- To
- 145.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 144.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:144.4-145.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 48.88
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.007 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.007 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.007”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.016Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.016
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 144.4 m
- To
- 145.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 144.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:144.4-145.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 48.88
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.016 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.016 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.016”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 98.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 98.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 207.6 m
- To
- 211.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 207.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:207.6-211.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 103.28
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 98.5 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“98.50”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.097Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.097
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 207.6 m
- To
- 211.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 207.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:207.6-211.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 103.28
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.097 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.097”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.029Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.029
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 207.6 m
- To
- 211.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 207.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:207.6-211.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 103.28
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.029 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.029 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.029”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.094Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.094
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 207.6 m
- To
- 211.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 207.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:207.6-211.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 103.28
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.094 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.094 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.094”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 30.96Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 30.96
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 216.6 m
- To
- 225.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 216.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:216.6-225.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 43.29
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 30.96 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“30.96”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.083Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.083
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 216.6 m
- To
- 225.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 216.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:216.6-225.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 43.29
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.083 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.083”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.088Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.088
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 216.6 m
- To
- 225.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 216.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:216.6-225.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 43.29
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.088 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.088 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.088”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.178Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.178
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 216.6 m
- To
- 225.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 216.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:216.6-225.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 43.29
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.178 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.178 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.178”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 25Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 25
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 296 m
- To
- 297.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 296 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:296-297.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 39.61
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 25 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“25.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.011Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.011
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 296 m
- To
- 297.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 296 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:296-297.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 39.61
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.011 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.011”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.112Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.112
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 296 m
- To
- 297.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 296 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:296-297.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 39.61
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.112 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.112 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.112”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.359Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.359
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 296 m
- To
- 297.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 296 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:296-297.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 39.61
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.359 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.359 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.359”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 52Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 52
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 305 m
- To
- 307 m
- Intercept Depth
- 305 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:305-307
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 52.14
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 52 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“52.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.012Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.012
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 305 m
- To
- 307 m
- Intercept Depth
- 305 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:305-307
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 52.14
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.012 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.012”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.033Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.033
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 305 m
- To
- 307 m
- Intercept Depth
- 305 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:305-307
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 52.14
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.033 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.033 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.033”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.045Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.045
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 305 m
- To
- 307 m
- Intercept Depth
- 305 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:305-307
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 52.14
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.045 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.045 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.045”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 218Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 218
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 346 m
- To
- 347.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 346 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:346-347.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 254.65
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 218 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“218.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.079Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.079
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 346 m
- To
- 347.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 346 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:346-347.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 254.65
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.079 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.079”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.456Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.456
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 346 m
- To
- 347.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 346 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:346-347.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 254.65
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.456 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.456 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.456”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.926Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.926
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 346 m
- To
- 347.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 346 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:346-347.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 254.65
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.926 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.926 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.926”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 26Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 26
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 8 m
- To
- 10 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:8-10
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 48.99
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 26 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“26.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.349Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.349
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 8 m
- To
- 10 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:8-10
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 48.99
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.349 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.349”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.005
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 8 m
- To
- 10 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:8-10
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 48.99
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.005 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.005 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.005”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.012Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.012
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 8 m
- To
- 10 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:8-10
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 48.99
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.012 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.012 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.012”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 194.38Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 194.38
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 18 m
- To
- 27 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:18-27
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 213.48
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 194.38 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“194.38”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.422Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.422
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 18 m
- To
- 27 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:18-27
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 213.48
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.422 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.422”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 18 m
- To
- 27 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:18-27
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 213.48
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.04 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.040”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.018Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.018
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 18 m
- To
- 27 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:18-27
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 213.48
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.018 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.018 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.018”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 246Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 246
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 21.4 m
- To
- 22.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:21.4-22.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 257.42
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 246 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“246.00”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.34
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 21.4 m
- To
- 22.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:21.4-22.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 257.42
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.34 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.340”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.082Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.082
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 21.4 m
- To
- 22.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:21.4-22.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 257.42
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.082 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.082 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.082”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.015Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.015
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 21.4 m
- To
- 22.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:21.4-22.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 257.42
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.015 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.015 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.015”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 574Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 574
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 22.4 m
- To
- 23.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:22.4-23.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 585.91
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 574 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“574.00”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.607Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.607
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 22.4 m
- To
- 23.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:22.4-23.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 585.91
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.607 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.607”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.128Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.128
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 22.4 m
- To
- 23.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:22.4-23.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 585.91
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.128 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.128 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.128”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 22.4 m
- To
- 23.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:22.4-23.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 585.91
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.03 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.030”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 437Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 437
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- From
- 23.5 m
- To
- 25.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:23.5-25.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 468.07
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 437 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“437.00”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.788Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.788
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- From
- 23.5 m
- To
- 25.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:23.5-25.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 468.07
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.788 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.788”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.075Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.075
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- From
- 23.5 m
- To
- 25.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:23.5-25.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 468.07
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.075 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.075 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.075”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.029Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.029
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- From
- 23.5 m
- To
- 25.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:23.5-25.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 468.07
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.029 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.029 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.029”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 66Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 66
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- From
- 25.1 m
- To
- 27 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:25.1-27
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 101.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 66 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“66.00”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.558Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.558
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- From
- 25.1 m
- To
- 27 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:25.1-27
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 101.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.558 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.558”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.009Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.009
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- From
- 25.1 m
- To
- 27 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:25.1-27
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 101.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.009 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.009 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.009”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.016Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.016
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- From
- 25.1 m
- To
- 27 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:25.1-27
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 101.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.016 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.016 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.016”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 180Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 180
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 31.3 m
- To
- 33.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 31.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:31.3-33.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 188.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 180 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“180.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.256Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.256
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 31.3 m
- To
- 33.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 31.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:31.3-33.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 188.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.256 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.256”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.015Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.015
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 31.3 m
- To
- 33.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 31.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:31.3-33.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 188.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.015 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.015 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.015”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 31.3 m
- To
- 33.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 31.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:31.3-33.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 188.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.04 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.040”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 25Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 25
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 38 m
- To
- 40 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:38-40
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 30.53
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 25 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“25.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 38 m
- To
- 40 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:38-40
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 30.53
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.06 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.060”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.015Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.015
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 38 m
- To
- 40 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:38-40
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 30.53
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.015 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.015 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.015”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.073Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.073
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 38 m
- To
- 40 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:38-40
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 30.53
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.073 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.073 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.073”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 26Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 26
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 65.5 m
- To
- 66.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 65.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:65.5-66.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 29.32
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 26 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“26.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.061Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.061
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 65.5 m
- To
- 66.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 65.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:65.5-66.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 29.32
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.061 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.061”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.002Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.002
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 65.5 m
- To
- 66.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 65.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:65.5-66.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 29.32
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.002 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.002 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.002”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.018Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.018
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 65.5 m
- To
- 66.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 65.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:65.5-66.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 29.32
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.018 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.018 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.018”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 56Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 56
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 70 m
- To
- 71 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:70-71
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 60.18
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 56 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“56.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.068Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.068
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 70 m
- To
- 71 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:70-71
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 60.18
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.068 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.068”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.008Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.008
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 70 m
- To
- 71 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:70-71
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 60.18
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.008 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.008 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.008”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.078Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.078
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 70 m
- To
- 71 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:70-71
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 60.18
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.078 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.078 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.078”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 62.49Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 20.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 62.49
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 20.7 m
- From
- 115.5 m
- To
- 136.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 115.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:115.5-136.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 76.48
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 62.49 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“62.49”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.102Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 20.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.102
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 20.7 m
- From
- 115.5 m
- To
- 136.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 115.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:115.5-136.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 76.48
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.102 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.102”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.162Grade Unit: %Intercept: 20.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.162
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 20.7 m
- From
- 115.5 m
- To
- 136.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 115.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:115.5-136.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 76.48
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.162 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.162 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.162”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.181Grade Unit: %Intercept: 20.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.181
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 20.7 m
- From
- 115.5 m
- To
- 136.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 115.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:115.5-136.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 76.48
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.181 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.7 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.181 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.181”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 115Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 115
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 116.5 m
- To
- 117.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 116.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:116.5-117.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 113.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 115 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“115.00”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.026Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.026
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 116.5 m
- To
- 117.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 116.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:116.5-117.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 113.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.026 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.026”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.081Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.081
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 116.5 m
- To
- 117.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 116.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:116.5-117.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 113.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.081 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.081 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.081”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.048Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.048
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 116.5 m
- To
- 117.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 116.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:116.5-117.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 113.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.048 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.048 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.048”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 129Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 129
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 119.2 m
- To
- 120.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 119.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:119.2-120.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 133.63
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 129 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“129.00”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.158Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.158
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 119.2 m
- To
- 120.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 119.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:119.2-120.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 133.63
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.158 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.158”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.026Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.026
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 119.2 m
- To
- 120.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 119.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:119.2-120.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 133.63
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.026 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.026 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.026”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.023Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.023
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 119.2 m
- To
- 120.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 119.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:119.2-120.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 133.63
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.023 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.023 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.023”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 98Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 98
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 121.7 m
- To
- 122.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 121.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:121.7-122.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 100.53
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 98 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“98.00”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 121.7 m
- To
- 122.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 121.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:121.7-122.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 100.53
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.09 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.090”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.029Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.029
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 121.7 m
- To
- 122.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 121.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:121.7-122.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 100.53
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.029 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.029 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.029”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.041Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.041
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 121.7 m
- To
- 122.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 121.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:121.7-122.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 100.53
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.041 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.041 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.041”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 47.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 47.4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 128 m
- To
- 130.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 128 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:128-130.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 96.41
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 47.4 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“47.40”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.296Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.296
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 128 m
- To
- 130.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 128 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:128-130.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 96.41
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.296 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.296”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.514Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.514
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 128 m
- To
- 130.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 128 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:128-130.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 96.41
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.514 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.514 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.514”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.501Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.501
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 128 m
- To
- 130.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 128 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:128-130.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 96.41
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.501 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.501 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.501”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 177Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 177
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 132 m
- To
- 134 m
- Intercept Depth
- 132 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:132-134
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 191.67
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 177 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“177.00”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.089Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.089
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 132 m
- To
- 134 m
- Intercept Depth
- 132 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:132-134
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 191.67
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.089 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.089”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.322Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.322
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 132 m
- To
- 134 m
- Intercept Depth
- 132 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:132-134
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 191.67
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.322 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.322 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.322”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.298Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.298
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 132 m
- To
- 134 m
- Intercept Depth
- 132 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:132-134
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 191.67
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.298 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.298 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.298”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 34Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 34
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 191 m
- To
- 193 m
- Intercept Depth
- 191 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:191-193
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 36.18
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 34 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“34.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.007Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.007
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 191 m
- To
- 193 m
- Intercept Depth
- 191 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:191-193
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 36.18
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.007 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.007”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.054Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.054
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 191 m
- To
- 193 m
- Intercept Depth
- 191 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:191-193
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 36.18
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.054 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.054 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.054”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.066Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.066
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 191 m
- To
- 193 m
- Intercept Depth
- 191 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:191-193
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 36.18
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.066 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.066 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.066”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 96.28Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 5.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 96.28
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- From
- 201 m
- To
- 206.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 201 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:201-206.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 125.76
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 96.28 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“96.28”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.008Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 5.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.008
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- From
- 201 m
- To
- 206.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 201 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:201-206.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 125.76
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.008 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.008”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.192Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.192
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- From
- 201 m
- To
- 206.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 201 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:201-206.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 125.76
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.192 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.192 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.192”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.861Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.861
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- From
- 201 m
- To
- 206.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 201 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:201-206.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 125.76
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.861 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 4.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.861 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.861”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 427Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 427
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 201 m
- To
- 202 m
- Intercept Depth
- 201 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:201-202
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 563.72
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 427 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“427.00”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.006Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.006
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 201 m
- To
- 202 m
- Intercept Depth
- 201 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:201-202
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 563.72
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.006 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.006”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.846Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.846
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 201 m
- To
- 202 m
- Intercept Depth
- 201 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:201-202
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 563.72
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.846 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.846 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.846”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 4.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.06
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 201 m
- To
- 202 m
- Intercept Depth
- 201 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:201-202
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 563.72
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.06 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 4.1 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.060”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 251Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 251
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 210.3 m
- To
- 211.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 210.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:210.3-211.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 258.85
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 251 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“251.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.136Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.136
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 210.3 m
- To
- 211.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 210.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:210.3-211.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 258.85
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.136 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.136”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.086Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.086
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 210.3 m
- To
- 211.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 210.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:210.3-211.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 258.85
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.086 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.086 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.086”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.327Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.327
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 210.3 m
- To
- 211.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 210.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:210.3-211.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 258.85
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.327 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.327 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.327”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 27.13Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 27.13
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 57.3 m
- To
- 62 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:57.3-62
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 32
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 27.13 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“27.13”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.088Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.088
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 57.3 m
- To
- 62 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:57.3-62
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 32
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.088 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.088”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.003Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.003
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 57.3 m
- To
- 62 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:57.3-62
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 32
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.003 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.003 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.003”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.011Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.011
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 57.3 m
- To
- 62 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:57.3-62
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 32
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.011 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.011 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.011”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 21.17Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 21.17
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 66 m
- To
- 69 m
- Intercept Depth
- 66 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:66-69
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 30.87
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 21.17 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“21.17”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.091Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.091
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 66 m
- To
- 69 m
- Intercept Depth
- 66 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:66-69
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 30.87
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.091 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.091”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.003Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.003
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 66 m
- To
- 69 m
- Intercept Depth
- 66 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:66-69
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 30.87
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.003 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.003 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.003”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.137Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.137
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 66 m
- To
- 69 m
- Intercept Depth
- 66 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:66-69
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 30.87
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.137 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.137 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.137”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 131.35Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 131.35
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 172 m
- To
- 192 m
- Intercept Depth
- 172 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:172-192
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 157.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 131.35 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“131.35”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.242Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.242
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 172 m
- To
- 192 m
- Intercept Depth
- 172 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:172-192
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 157.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.242 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.242”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.188Grade Unit: %Intercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.188
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 172 m
- To
- 192 m
- Intercept Depth
- 172 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:172-192
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 157.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.188 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.8 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.188 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.188”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.351Grade Unit: %Intercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.351
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 172 m
- To
- 192 m
- Intercept Depth
- 172 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:172-192
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 157.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.351 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 7.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.351 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.351”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 144.22Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 144.22
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2.3 m
- From
- 174.7 m
- To
- 177 m
- Intercept Depth
- 174.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:174.7-177
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 182.59
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 144.22 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“144.22”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.308Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.308
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2.3 m
- From
- 174.7 m
- To
- 177 m
- Intercept Depth
- 174.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:174.7-177
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 182.59
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.308 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.308”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.305Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.305
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.3 m
- From
- 174.7 m
- To
- 177 m
- Intercept Depth
- 174.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:174.7-177
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 182.59
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.305 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.305 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.305”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.508Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.508
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.3 m
- From
- 174.7 m
- To
- 177 m
- Intercept Depth
- 174.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:174.7-177
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 182.59
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.508 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.508 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.508”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 336.33Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 5.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 336.33
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 5.2 m
- From
- 178.4 m
- To
- 183.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 178.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:178.4-183.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 376.37
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 336.33 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“336.33”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.488Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 5.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.488
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 5.2 m
- From
- 178.4 m
- To
- 183.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 178.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:178.4-183.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 376.37
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.488 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.488”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.365Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.365
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.2 m
- From
- 178.4 m
- To
- 183.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 178.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:178.4-183.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 376.37
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.365 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.9 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.365 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.365”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.483Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.483
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.2 m
- From
- 178.4 m
- To
- 183.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 178.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:178.4-183.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 376.37
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.483 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.483 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.483”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 920Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 920
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 178.4 m
- To
- 179.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 178.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:178.4-179.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 934.62
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 920 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“920.00”
Context: and including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.492Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.492
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 178.4 m
- To
- 179.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 178.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:178.4-179.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 934.62
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.492 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.492”
Context: and including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.712Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.712
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 178.4 m
- To
- 179.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 178.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:178.4-179.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 934.62
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.712 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.9 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.712 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.712”
Context: and including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.47
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 178.4 m
- To
- 179.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 178.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:178.4-179.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 934.62
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.47 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.47 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.470”
Context: and including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 123Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 123
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 187 m
- To
- 189 m
- Intercept Depth
- 187 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:187-189
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 136.68
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 123 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“123.00”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 187 m
- To
- 189 m
- Intercept Depth
- 187 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:187-189
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 136.68
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.17 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.170”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.105Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.105
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 187 m
- To
- 189 m
- Intercept Depth
- 187 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:187-189
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 136.68
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.105 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.105 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.105”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.188Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.188
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 187 m
- To
- 189 m
- Intercept Depth
- 187 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:187-189
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 136.68
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.188 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.188 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.188”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 27.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 27.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 6.1 m
- To
- 9.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:6.1-9.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 33.51
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 27.5 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“27.50”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.099Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.099
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 6.1 m
- To
- 9.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:6.1-9.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 33.51
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.099 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.099”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.004Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.004
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 6.1 m
- To
- 9.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:6.1-9.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 33.51
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.004 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.004 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.004”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.023Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.023
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 6.1 m
- To
- 9.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:6.1-9.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 33.51
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.023 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.023 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.023”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 437Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 437
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 103.6 m
- To
- 105.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 103.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:103.6-105.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 425.39
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 437 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“437.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.165Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.165
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 103.6 m
- To
- 105.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 103.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:103.6-105.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 425.39
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.165 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.165”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 103.6 m
- To
- 105.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 103.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:103.6-105.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 425.39
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.06 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.060”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.046Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.046
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 103.6 m
- To
- 105.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 103.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:103.6-105.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 425.39
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.046 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.046 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.046”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 19.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 123.4 m
- To
- 131.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 123.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:123.4-131.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 30.73
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 19.8 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“19.80”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.081Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.081
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 123.4 m
- To
- 131.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 123.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:123.4-131.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 30.73
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.081 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.081”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.059Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.059
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 123.4 m
- To
- 131.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 123.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:123.4-131.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 30.73
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.059 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.059 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.059”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.143Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.143
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 123.4 m
- To
- 131.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 123.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:123.4-131.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 30.73
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.143 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.143 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.143”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 95Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 95
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 153.9 m
- To
- 155.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 153.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:153.9-155.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 101.57
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 95 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“95.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.128Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.128
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 153.9 m
- To
- 155.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 153.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:153.9-155.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 101.57
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.128 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.128”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 153.9 m
- To
- 155.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 153.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:153.9-155.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 101.57
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.03 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.030”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.077Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.077
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 153.9 m
- To
- 155.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 153.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:153.9-155.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 101.57
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.077 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.077 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.077”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 46Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 46
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 175.3 m
- To
- 176.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 175.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:175.3-176.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 53.57
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 46 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“46.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.019Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.019
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 175.3 m
- To
- 176.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 175.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:175.3-176.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 53.57
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.019 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.019”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.121Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.121
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 175.3 m
- To
- 176.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 175.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:175.3-176.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 53.57
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.121 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.121 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.121”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.165Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.165
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 175.3 m
- To
- 176.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 175.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:175.3-176.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 53.57
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.165 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.165 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.165”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 20.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 20.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 233.2 m
- To
- 236.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 233.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:233.2-236.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 67.57
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 20.5 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“20.50”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.042Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.042
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 233.2 m
- To
- 236.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 233.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:233.2-236.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 67.57
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.042 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.042”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.22
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 233.2 m
- To
- 236.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 233.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:233.2-236.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 67.57
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.22 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.22 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.220”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 1.154Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.154
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 233.2 m
- To
- 236.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 233.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:233.2-236.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 67.57
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.154 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.154 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.154”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 59.75Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 59.75
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 18.3 m
- To
- 24.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:18.3-24.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 59.05
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 59.75 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“59.75”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.024Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.024
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 18.3 m
- To
- 24.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:18.3-24.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 59.05
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.024 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.024”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.006Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.006
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 18.3 m
- To
- 24.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:18.3-24.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 59.05
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.006 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.006 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.006”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.031Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.031
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 18.3 m
- To
- 24.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:18.3-24.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 59.05
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.031 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.031 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.031”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 141Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 141
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 22.9 m
- To
- 24.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:22.9-24.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 136.13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 141 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“141.00”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.027Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.027
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 22.9 m
- To
- 24.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:22.9-24.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 136.13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.027 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.027”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.013Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.013
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 22.9 m
- To
- 24.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:22.9-24.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 136.13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.013 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.013 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.013”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.041Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.041
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 22.9 m
- To
- 24.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:22.9-24.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 136.13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.041 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.041 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.041”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 102Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 102
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 30.5 m
- To
- 32 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:30.5-32
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 97.12
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 102 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“102.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.012Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.012
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 30.5 m
- To
- 32 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:30.5-32
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 97.12
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.012 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.012”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.004Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.004
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 30.5 m
- To
- 32 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:30.5-32
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 97.12
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.004 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.004 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.004”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.009Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.009
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 30.5 m
- To
- 32 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:30.5-32
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 97.12
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.009 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.009 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.009”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 44.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 44.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 70.1 m
- To
- 77.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:70.1-77.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 51.75
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 44.8 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“44.80”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 70.1 m
- To
- 77.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:70.1-77.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 51.75
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.12 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.120”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.011Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.011
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 70.1 m
- To
- 77.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:70.1-77.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 51.75
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.011 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.011 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.011”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.032Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.032
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 70.1 m
- To
- 77.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:70.1-77.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 51.75
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.032 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.032 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.032”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 99Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 99
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 76.2 m
- To
- 77.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 76.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:76.2-77.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 101.46
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 99 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“99.00”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.094Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.094
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 76.2 m
- To
- 77.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 76.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:76.2-77.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 101.46
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.094 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.094”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.022Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.022
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 76.2 m
- To
- 77.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 76.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:76.2-77.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 101.46
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.022 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.022 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.022”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.039Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.039
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 76.2 m
- To
- 77.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 76.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:76.2-77.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 101.46
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.039 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.039 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.039”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 34.55Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 16.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 34.55
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 16.8 m
- From
- 86.9 m
- To
- 103.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 86.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:86.9-103.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 45.74
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 34.55 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“34.55”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.178Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 16.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.178
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 16.8 m
- From
- 86.9 m
- To
- 103.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 86.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:86.9-103.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 45.74
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.178 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.178”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.008Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.008
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 16.8 m
- From
- 86.9 m
- To
- 103.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 86.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:86.9-103.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 45.74
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.008 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.008 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.008”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.024Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.024
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 16.8 m
- From
- 86.9 m
- To
- 103.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 86.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:86.9-103.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 45.74
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.024 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.024 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.024”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 70Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 70
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 93 m
- To
- 94.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 93 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:93-94.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 94.87
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 70 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“70.00”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.387Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.387
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 93 m
- To
- 94.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 93 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:93-94.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 94.87
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.387 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.387”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.011Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.011
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 93 m
- To
- 94.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 93 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:93-94.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 94.87
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.011 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.011 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.011”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.063Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.063
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 93 m
- To
- 94.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 93 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:93-94.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 94.87
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.063 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.063 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.063”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 121Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 121
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 97.5 m
- To
- 99.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 97.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:97.5-99.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 130.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 121 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“121.00”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.22
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 97.5 m
- To
- 99.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 97.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:97.5-99.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 130.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.22 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.220”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.018Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.018
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 97.5 m
- To
- 99.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 97.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:97.5-99.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 130.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.018 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.018 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.018”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.026Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.026
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 97.5 m
- To
- 99.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 97.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:97.5-99.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 130.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.026 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.026 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.026”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 22Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 22
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 15.2 m
- To
- 16.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 15.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:15.2-16.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 43.67
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 22 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“22.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.33
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 15.2 m
- To
- 16.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 15.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:15.2-16.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 43.67
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.33 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.330”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.001Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.001
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 15.2 m
- To
- 16.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 15.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:15.2-16.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 43.67
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.001 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.001 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.001”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.008Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.008
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 15.2 m
- To
- 16.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 15.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:15.2-16.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 43.67
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.008 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.008 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.008”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 71.25Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 71.25
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 48.8 m
- To
- 54.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 48.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:48.8-54.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 81.95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 71.25 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“71.25”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.203Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.203
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 48.8 m
- To
- 54.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 48.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:48.8-54.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 81.95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.203 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.203”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.009Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.009
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 48.8 m
- To
- 54.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 48.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:48.8-54.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 81.95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.009 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.009 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.009”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.022Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.022
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 48.8 m
- To
- 54.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 48.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:48.8-54.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 81.95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.022 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.022 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.022”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 243Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 243
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 48.8 m
- To
- 50.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 48.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:48.8-50.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 246.92
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 243 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“243.00”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.242Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.242
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 48.8 m
- To
- 50.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 48.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:48.8-50.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 246.92
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.242 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.242”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.026Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.026
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 48.8 m
- To
- 50.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 48.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:48.8-50.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 246.92
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.026 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.026 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.026”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.033Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.033
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 48.8 m
- To
- 50.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 48.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:48.8-50.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 246.92
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.033 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.033 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.033”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 20.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 20.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 76.2 m
- To
- 82.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 76.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:76.2-82.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 35.98
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 20.5 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“20.50”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.183Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.183
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 76.2 m
- To
- 82.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 76.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:76.2-82.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 35.98
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.183 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.183”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.011Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.011
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 76.2 m
- To
- 82.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 76.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:76.2-82.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 35.98
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.011 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.011 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.011”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.112Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.112
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 76.2 m
- To
- 82.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 76.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:76.2-82.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 35.98
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.112 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.112 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.112”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 77.13Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 12.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 77.13
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 12.2 m
- From
- 123.4 m
- To
- 135.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 123.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:123.4-135.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 105.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 77.13 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“77.13”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.107Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 12.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.107
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 12.2 m
- From
- 123.4 m
- To
- 135.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 123.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:123.4-135.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 105.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.107 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.107”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.373Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.373
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12.2 m
- From
- 123.4 m
- To
- 135.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 123.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:123.4-135.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 105.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.373 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 4.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.373 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.373”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.446Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.446
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12.2 m
- From
- 123.4 m
- To
- 135.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 123.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:123.4-135.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 105.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.446 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 5.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.446 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.446”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 218.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 218.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 128 m
- To
- 131.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 128 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:128-131.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 277.14
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 218.5 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“218.50”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.072Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.072
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 128 m
- To
- 131.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 128 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:128-131.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 277.14
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.072 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.072”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 1.112Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.112
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 128 m
- To
- 131.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 128 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:128-131.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 277.14
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.112 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.3 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.112”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 1.046Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.046
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 128 m
- To
- 131.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 128 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:128-131.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 277.14
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.046 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.046 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.046”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 42Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 42
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 140.2 m
- To
- 141.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 140.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:140.2-141.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 47.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 42 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“42.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.025Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.025
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 140.2 m
- To
- 141.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 140.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:140.2-141.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 47.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.025 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.025”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.123Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.123
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 140.2 m
- To
- 141.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 140.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:140.2-141.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 47.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.123 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.123 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.123”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.075Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.075
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 140.2 m
- To
- 141.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 140.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:140.2-141.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 47.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.075 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.075 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.075”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 38.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 38.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 42.7 m
- To
- 45.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:42.7-45.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 41.95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 38.5 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“38.50”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.074Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.074
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 42.7 m
- To
- 45.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:42.7-45.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 41.95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.074 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.074”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.002Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.002
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 42.7 m
- To
- 45.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:42.7-45.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 41.95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.002 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.002 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.002”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.019Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.019
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 42.7 m
- To
- 45.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:42.7-45.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 41.95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.019 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.019 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.019”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 46.33Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 46.33
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 57.9 m
- To
- 62.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:57.9-62.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 51.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 46.33 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“46.33”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.101Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.101
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 57.9 m
- To
- 62.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:57.9-62.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 51.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.101 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.101”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.006Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.006
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 57.9 m
- To
- 62.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:57.9-62.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 51.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.006 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.006 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.006”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.018Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.018
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 57.9 m
- To
- 62.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:57.9-62.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 51.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.018 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.018 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.018”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 78.33Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 78.33
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 71.6 m
- To
- 80.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 71.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:71.6-80.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 93.13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 78.33 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“78.33”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.262Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.262
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 71.6 m
- To
- 80.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 71.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:71.6-80.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 93.13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.262 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.262”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 71.6 m
- To
- 80.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 71.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:71.6-80.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 93.13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.010”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.034Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.034
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 71.6 m
- To
- 80.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 71.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:71.6-80.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 93.13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.034 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.034 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.034”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 163.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 163.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 73.2 m
- To
- 76.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 73.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:73.2-76.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 185.98
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 163.5 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“163.50”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.44
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 73.2 m
- To
- 76.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 73.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:73.2-76.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 185.98
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.44 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.440”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.016Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.016
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 73.2 m
- To
- 76.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 73.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:73.2-76.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 185.98
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.016 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.016 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.016”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.047Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.047
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 73.2 m
- To
- 76.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 73.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:73.2-76.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 185.98
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.047 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.047 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.047”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 29.75Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 29.75
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 89.9 m
- To
- 96 m
- Intercept Depth
- 89.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:89.9-96
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 35.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 29.75 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“29.75”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.098Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.098
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 89.9 m
- To
- 96 m
- Intercept Depth
- 89.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:89.9-96
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 35.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.098 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.098”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.004Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.004
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 89.9 m
- To
- 96 m
- Intercept Depth
- 89.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:89.9-96
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 35.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.004 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.004 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.004”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.016Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.016
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 89.9 m
- To
- 96 m
- Intercept Depth
- 89.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:89.9-96
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 35.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.016 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.016 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.016”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 22Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 22
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 115.8 m
- To
- 117.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 115.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:115.8-117.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 25.37
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 22 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“22.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 115.8 m
- To
- 117.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 115.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:115.8-117.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 25.37
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.06 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.060”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.003Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.003
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 115.8 m
- To
- 117.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 115.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:115.8-117.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 25.37
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.003 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.003 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.003”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.014Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.014
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 115.8 m
- To
- 117.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 115.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:115.8-117.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 25.37
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.014 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.014 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.014”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 20Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 20
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 118.9 m
- To
- 120.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 118.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:118.9-120.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 28.89
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 20 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“20.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.137Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.137
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 118.9 m
- To
- 120.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 118.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:118.9-120.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 28.89
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.137 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.137”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.003Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.003
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 118.9 m
- To
- 120.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 118.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:118.9-120.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 28.89
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.003 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.003 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.003”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.018Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.018
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 118.9 m
- To
- 120.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 118.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:118.9-120.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 28.89
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.018 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.018 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.018”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 39Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 39
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 201.2 m
- To
- 202.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 201.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:201.2-202.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 41.45
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 39 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“39.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.017Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.017
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 201.2 m
- To
- 202.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 201.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:201.2-202.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 41.45
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.017 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.017”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.054Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.054
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 201.2 m
- To
- 202.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 201.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:201.2-202.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 41.45
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.054 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.054 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.054”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.062Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.062
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 201.2 m
- To
- 202.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 201.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:201.2-202.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 41.45
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.062 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.062 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.062”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 24Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 24
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 281.9 m
- To
- 283.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 281.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:281.9-283.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 27.83
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 24 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“24.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.057Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.057
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 281.9 m
- To
- 283.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 281.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:281.9-283.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 27.83
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.057 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.057”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.019Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.019
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 281.9 m
- To
- 283.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 281.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:281.9-283.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 27.83
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.019 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.019 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.019”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.024Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.024
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 281.9 m
- To
- 283.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 281.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:281.9-283.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 27.83
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.024 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.024 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.024”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 58Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 58
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 21.3 m
- To
- 22.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:21.3-22.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 57.14
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 58 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“58.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.029Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.029
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 21.3 m
- To
- 22.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:21.3-22.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 57.14
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.029 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.029”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.003Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.003
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 21.3 m
- To
- 22.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:21.3-22.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 57.14
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.003 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.003 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.003”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.016Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.016
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 21.3 m
- To
- 22.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:21.3-22.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 57.14
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.016 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.016 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.016”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 35Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 35
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 83.8 m
- To
- 86.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:83.8-86.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 74.73
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 35 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“35.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.596Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.596
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 83.8 m
- To
- 86.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:83.8-86.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 74.73
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.596 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.596”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.007Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.007
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 83.8 m
- To
- 86.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:83.8-86.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 74.73
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.007 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.007 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.007”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.019Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.019
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 83.8 m
- To
- 86.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:83.8-86.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 74.73
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.019 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.019 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.019”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 22.67Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 22.67
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 111.3 m
- To
- 115.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:111.3-115.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 25.71
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 22.67 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“22.67”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.057Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.057
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 111.3 m
- To
- 115.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:111.3-115.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 25.71
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.057 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.057”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.005
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 111.3 m
- To
- 115.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:111.3-115.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 25.71
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.005 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.005 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.005”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 111.3 m
- To
- 115.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:111.3-115.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 25.71
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.010”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 141Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 141
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 140.2 m
- To
- 146.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 140.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:140.2-146.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 137.45
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 141 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“141.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.046Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.046
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 140.2 m
- To
- 146.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 140.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:140.2-146.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 137.45
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.046 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.046”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.022Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.022
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 140.2 m
- To
- 146.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 140.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:140.2-146.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 137.45
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.022 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.022 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.022”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.034Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.034
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 140.2 m
- To
- 146.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 140.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:140.2-146.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 137.45
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.034 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.034 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.034”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 357Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 357
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 144.8 m
- To
- 146.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 144.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:144.8-146.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 341.85
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 357 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“357.00”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.054Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.054
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 144.8 m
- To
- 146.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 144.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:144.8-146.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 341.85
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.054 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.054”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.031Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.031
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 144.8 m
- To
- 146.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 144.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:144.8-146.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 341.85
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.031 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.031 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.031”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 144.8 m
- To
- 146.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 144.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:144.8-146.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 341.85
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.05 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.050”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 33Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 33
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 210.3 m
- To
- 211.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 210.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:210.3-211.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 51.63
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 33 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“33.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.281Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.281
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 210.3 m
- To
- 211.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 210.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:210.3-211.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 51.63
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.281 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.281”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.011Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.011
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 210.3 m
- To
- 211.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 210.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:210.3-211.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 51.63
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.011 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.011 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.011”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.028Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.028
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 210.3 m
- To
- 211.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 210.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:210.3-211.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 51.63
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.028 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.028 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.028”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 36Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 36
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 73.2 m
- To
- 74.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 73.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:73.2-74.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 36.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 36 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“36.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.034Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.034
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 73.2 m
- To
- 74.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 73.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:73.2-74.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 36.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.034 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.034”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 73.2 m
- To
- 74.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 73.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:73.2-74.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 36.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.000”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.006Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.006
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 73.2 m
- To
- 74.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 73.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:73.2-74.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 36.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.006 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.006 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.006”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 224Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 224
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 80.8 m
- To
- 82.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 80.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:80.8-82.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 213.72
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 224 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“224.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.039Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.039
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 80.8 m
- To
- 82.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 80.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:80.8-82.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 213.72
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.039 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.039”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.006Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.006
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 80.8 m
- To
- 82.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 80.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:80.8-82.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 213.72
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.006 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.006 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.006”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.009Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.009
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 80.8 m
- To
- 82.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 80.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:80.8-82.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 213.72
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.009 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.009 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.009”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 18Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 18
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 138.7 m
- To
- 140.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 138.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:138.7-140.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 26.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 18 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“18.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.128Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.128
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 138.7 m
- To
- 140.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 138.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:138.7-140.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 26.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.128 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.128”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.002Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.002
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 138.7 m
- To
- 140.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 138.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:138.7-140.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 26.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.002 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.002 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.002”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.014Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.014
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 138.7 m
- To
- 140.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 138.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:138.7-140.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 26.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.014 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.014 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.014”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 11Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 11
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 163.1 m
- To
- 164.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:163.1-164.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 25.39
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 11 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“11.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.207Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.207
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 163.1 m
- To
- 164.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:163.1-164.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 25.39
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.207 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.207”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.006Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.006
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 163.1 m
- To
- 164.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:163.1-164.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 25.39
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.006 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.006 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.006”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.019Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.019
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 163.1 m
- To
- 164.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:163.1-164.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 25.39
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.019 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.019 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.019”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 50.92Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 39.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 50.92
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 39.6 m
- From
- 179.8 m
- To
- 219.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 179.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:179.8-219.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 61.79
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 50.92 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“50.92”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 39.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 39.6 m
- From
- 179.8 m
- To
- 219.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 179.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:179.8-219.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 61.79
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.19 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.190”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: %Intercept: 39.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.005
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 39.6 m
- From
- 179.8 m
- To
- 219.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 179.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:179.8-219.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 61.79
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.005 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.005 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.005”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 39.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 39.6 m
- From
- 179.8 m
- To
- 219.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 179.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:179.8-219.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 61.79
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.020”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 108Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 12.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 108
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 12.2 m
- From
- 192 m
- To
- 204.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 192 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:192-204.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 117.56
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 108 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“108.00”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.221Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 12.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.221
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 12.2 m
- From
- 192 m
- To
- 204.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 192 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:192-204.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 117.56
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.221 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.221”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.008Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.008
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12.2 m
- From
- 192 m
- To
- 204.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 192 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:192-204.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 117.56
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.008 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.008 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.008”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.017Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.017
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12.2 m
- From
- 192 m
- To
- 204.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 192 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:192-204.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 117.56
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.017 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.017 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.017”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 95Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 95
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 192 m
- To
- 193.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 192 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:192-193.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 124.85
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 95 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“95.00”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.509Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.509
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 192 m
- To
- 193.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 192 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:192-193.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 124.85
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.509 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.509”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.003Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.003
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 192 m
- To
- 193.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 192 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:192-193.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 124.85
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.003 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.003 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.003”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.013Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.013
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 192 m
- To
- 193.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 192 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:192-193.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 124.85
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.013 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.013 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.013”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 158.75Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 158.75
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 198.1 m
- To
- 204.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 198.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:198.1-204.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 164.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 158.75 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“158.75”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.202Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.202
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 198.1 m
- To
- 204.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 198.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:198.1-204.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 164.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.202 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.202”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.012Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.012
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 198.1 m
- To
- 204.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 198.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:198.1-204.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 164.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.012 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.012 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.012”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.022Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.022
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 198.1 m
- To
- 204.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 198.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:198.1-204.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 164.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.022 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.022 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.022”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 305Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 305
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 199.6 m
- To
- 201.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 199.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:199.6-201.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 300.16
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 305 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“305.00”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.173Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.173
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 199.6 m
- To
- 201.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 199.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:199.6-201.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 300.16
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.173 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.173”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.021Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.021
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 199.6 m
- To
- 201.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 199.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:199.6-201.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 300.16
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.021 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.021 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.021”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.029Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.029
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 199.6 m
- To
- 201.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 199.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:199.6-201.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 300.16
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.029 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.029 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.029”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 33.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 33.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:0-3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 39.48
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 33.5 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“33.50”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.111Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.111
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:0-3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 39.48
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.111 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.111”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.002Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.002
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:0-3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 39.48
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.002 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.002 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.002”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:0-3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 39.48
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.010”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 26.33Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 26.33
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 38.1 m
- To
- 47.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:38.1-47.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 37.61
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 26.33 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“26.33”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.179Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.179
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 38.1 m
- To
- 47.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:38.1-47.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 37.61
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.179 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.179”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.004Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.004
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 38.1 m
- To
- 47.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:38.1-47.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 37.61
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.004 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.004 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.004”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.012Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.012
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 38.1 m
- To
- 47.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:38.1-47.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 37.61
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.012 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.012 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.012”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 97Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 97
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 143.3 m
- To
- 144.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 143.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:143.3-144.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 108.76
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 97 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“97.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.236Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.236
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 143.3 m
- To
- 144.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 143.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:143.3-144.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 108.76
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.236 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.236”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 143.3 m
- To
- 144.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 143.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:143.3-144.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 108.76
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.03 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.030”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.014Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.014
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 143.3 m
- To
- 144.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 143.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:143.3-144.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 108.76
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.014 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.014 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.014”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 141.75Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 141.75
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 1.5 m
- To
- 7.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:1.5-7.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 149.16
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 141.75 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“141.75”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.216Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.216
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 1.5 m
- To
- 7.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:1.5-7.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 149.16
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.216 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.216”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 1.5 m
- To
- 7.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:1.5-7.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 149.16
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.010”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.022Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.022
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 1.5 m
- To
- 7.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:1.5-7.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 149.16
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.022 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.022 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.022”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 53Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 53
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 13.7 m
- To
- 15.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:13.7-15.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 53.31
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 53 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“53.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.045Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.045
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 13.7 m
- To
- 15.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:13.7-15.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 53.31
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.045 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.045”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.003Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.003
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 13.7 m
- To
- 15.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:13.7-15.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 53.31
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.003 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.003 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.003”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.009Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.009
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 13.7 m
- To
- 15.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:13.7-15.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 53.31
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.009 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.009 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.009”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 15Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 15
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 149.4 m
- To
- 150.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 149.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:149.4-150.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 27.03
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 15 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“15.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.173Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.173
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 149.4 m
- To
- 150.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 149.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:149.4-150.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 27.03
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.173 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.173”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.015Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.015
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 149.4 m
- To
- 150.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 149.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:149.4-150.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 27.03
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.015 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.015 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.015”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.018Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.018
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 149.4 m
- To
- 150.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 149.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:149.4-150.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 27.03
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.018 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.018 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.018”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 22Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 22
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 45.7 m
- To
- 47.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 45.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:45.7-47.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 26.37
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 22 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“22.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.075Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.075
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 45.7 m
- To
- 47.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 45.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:45.7-47.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 26.37
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.075 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.075”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.003Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.003
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 45.7 m
- To
- 47.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 45.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:45.7-47.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 26.37
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.003 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.003 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.003”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.013Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.013
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 45.7 m
- To
- 47.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 45.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:45.7-47.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 26.37
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.013 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.013 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.013”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 62.5 m
- To
- 64 m
- Intercept Depth
- 62.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:62.5-64
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 32.24
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 9 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“9.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.342Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.342
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 62.5 m
- To
- 64 m
- Intercept Depth
- 62.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:62.5-64
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 32.24
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.342 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.342”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 62.5 m
- To
- 64 m
- Intercept Depth
- 62.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:62.5-64
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 32.24
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.000”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.007Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.007
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 62.5 m
- To
- 64 m
- Intercept Depth
- 62.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:62.5-64
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 32.24
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.007 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.007 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.007”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 37Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 37
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 91.4 m
- To
- 93 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:91.4-93
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 36.67
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 37 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“37.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 91.4 m
- To
- 93 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:91.4-93
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 36.67
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.02 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.020”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.001Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.001
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 91.4 m
- To
- 93 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:91.4-93
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 36.67
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.001 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.001 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.001”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.014Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.014
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 91.4 m
- To
- 93 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:91.4-93
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 36.67
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.014 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.014 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.014”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 24Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 24
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 120.4 m
- To
- 121.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:120.4-121.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 29.64
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 24 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“24.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.095Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.095
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 120.4 m
- To
- 121.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:120.4-121.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 29.64
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.095 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.095”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.001Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.001
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 120.4 m
- To
- 121.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:120.4-121.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 29.64
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.001 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.001 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.001”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.015Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.015
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 120.4 m
- To
- 121.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:120.4-121.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 29.64
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.015 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.015 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.015”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 64.67Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 64.67
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 128 m
- To
- 137.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 128 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:128-137.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 77.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 64.67 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“64.67”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.224Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.224
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 128 m
- To
- 137.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 128 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:128-137.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 77.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.224 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.224”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.008Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.008
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 128 m
- To
- 137.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 128 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:128-137.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 77.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.008 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.008 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.008”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.029Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.029
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 128 m
- To
- 137.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 128 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:128-137.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 77.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.029 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.029 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.029”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 199Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 199
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 131.1 m
- To
- 132.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 131.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:131.1-132.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 238.93
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 199 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“199.00”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.721Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.721
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 131.1 m
- To
- 132.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 131.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:131.1-132.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 238.93
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.721 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.721”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 131.1 m
- To
- 132.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 131.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:131.1-132.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 238.93
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.020”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 131.1 m
- To
- 132.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 131.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:131.1-132.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 238.93
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.05 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.050”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 83Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 83
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 29 m
- To
- 32 m
- Intercept Depth
- 29 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:29-32
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 88.31
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 83 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“83.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 29 m
- To
- 32 m
- Intercept Depth
- 29 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:29-32
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 88.31
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.14 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.140”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.006Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.006
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 29 m
- To
- 32 m
- Intercept Depth
- 29 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:29-32
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 88.31
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.006 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.006 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.006”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.014Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.014
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 29 m
- To
- 32 m
- Intercept Depth
- 29 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:29-32
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 88.31
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.014 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.014 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.014”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 25Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 25
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 44.2 m
- To
- 45.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 44.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:44.2-45.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 35.06
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 25 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“25.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.161Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.161
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 44.2 m
- To
- 45.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 44.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:44.2-45.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 35.06
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.161 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.161”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.003Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.003
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 44.2 m
- To
- 45.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 44.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:44.2-45.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 35.06
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.003 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.003 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.003”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.012Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.012
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 44.2 m
- To
- 45.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 44.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:44.2-45.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 35.06
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.012 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.012 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.012”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 65Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 65
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 65.5 m
- To
- 67.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 65.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:65.5-67.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 72.76
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 65 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“65.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.162Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.162
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 65.5 m
- To
- 67.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 65.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:65.5-67.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 72.76
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.162 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.162”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.005
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 65.5 m
- To
- 67.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 65.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:65.5-67.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 72.76
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.005 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.005 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.005”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.011Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.011
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 65.5 m
- To
- 67.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 65.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:65.5-67.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 72.76
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.011 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.011 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.011”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 31Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 31
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 77.7 m
- To
- 79.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 77.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:77.7-79.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 35.75
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 31 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“31.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.064Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.064
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 77.7 m
- To
- 79.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 77.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:77.7-79.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 35.75
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.064 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.064”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.014Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.014
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 77.7 m
- To
- 79.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 77.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:77.7-79.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 35.75
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.014 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.014 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.014”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.054Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.054
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 77.7 m
- To
- 79.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 77.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:77.7-79.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 35.75
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.054 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.054 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.054”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 153Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 153
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 25.9 m
- To
- 29 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:25.9-29
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 152.61
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 153 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“153.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.114Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.114
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 25.9 m
- To
- 29 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:25.9-29
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 152.61
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.114 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.114”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.007Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.007
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 25.9 m
- To
- 29 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:25.9-29
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 152.61
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.007 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.007 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.007”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.022Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.022
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 25.9 m
- To
- 29 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:25.9-29
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 152.61
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.022 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.022 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.022”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 97Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 97
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 59.4 m
- To
- 61 m
- Intercept Depth
- 59.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:59.4-61
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 97
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 97 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“97.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.076Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.076
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 59.4 m
- To
- 61 m
- Intercept Depth
- 59.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:59.4-61
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 97
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.076 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.076”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.006Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.006
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 59.4 m
- To
- 61 m
- Intercept Depth
- 59.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:59.4-61
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 97
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.006 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.006 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.006”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.013Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.013
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 59.4 m
- To
- 61 m
- Intercept Depth
- 59.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:59.4-61
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 97
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.013 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.013 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.013”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 98.25Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 98.25
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 82.3 m
- To
- 88.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 82.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:82.3-88.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 101.63
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 98.25 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“98.25”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.122Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.122
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 82.3 m
- To
- 88.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 82.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:82.3-88.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 101.63
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.122 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.122”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.009Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.009
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 82.3 m
- To
- 88.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 82.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:82.3-88.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 101.63
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.009 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.009 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.009”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.018Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.018
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 82.3 m
- To
- 88.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 82.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:82.3-88.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 101.63
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.018 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.018 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.018”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 32Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 32
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 9.1 m
- To
- 12.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 9.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:9.1-12.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 36.95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 32 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“32.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.088Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.088
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 9.1 m
- To
- 12.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 9.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:9.1-12.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 36.95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.088 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.088”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.001Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.001
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 9.1 m
- To
- 12.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 9.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:9.1-12.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 36.95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.001 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.001 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.001”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.023Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.023
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 9.1 m
- To
- 12.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 9.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:9.1-12.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 36.95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.023 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.023 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.023”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 11Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 11
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 18.3 m
- To
- 19.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:18.3-19.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 61.51
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 11 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“11.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.74Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.74
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 18.3 m
- To
- 19.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:18.3-19.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 61.51
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.74 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.740”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.001Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.001
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 18.3 m
- To
- 19.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:18.3-19.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 61.51
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.001 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.001 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.001”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.007Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.007
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 18.3 m
- To
- 19.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:18.3-19.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 61.51
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.007 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.007 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.007”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 27.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 27.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 24.4 m
- To
- 27.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:24.4-27.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 32.13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 27.5 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“27.50”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.087Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.087
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 24.4 m
- To
- 27.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:24.4-27.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 32.13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.087 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.087”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.001Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.001
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 24.4 m
- To
- 27.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:24.4-27.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 32.13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.001 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.001 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.001”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.008Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.008
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 24.4 m
- To
- 27.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:24.4-27.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 32.13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.008 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.008 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.008”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 35.1 m
- To
- 36.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 35.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:35.1-36.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 27.87
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 9 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“9.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.278Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.278
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 35.1 m
- To
- 36.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 35.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:35.1-36.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 27.87
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.278 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.278”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.001Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.001
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 35.1 m
- To
- 36.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 35.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:35.1-36.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 27.87
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.001 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.001 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.001”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.008Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.008
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 35.1 m
- To
- 36.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 35.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:35.1-36.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 27.87
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.008 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.008 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.008”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 23Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 23
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 53.3 m
- To
- 54.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 53.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:53.3-54.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 26.75
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 23 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“23.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.065Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.065
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 53.3 m
- To
- 54.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 53.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:53.3-54.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 26.75
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.065 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.065”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.004Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.004
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 53.3 m
- To
- 54.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 53.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:53.3-54.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 26.75
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.004 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.004 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.004”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.016Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.016
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 53.3 m
- To
- 54.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 53.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:53.3-54.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 26.75
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.016 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.016 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.016”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 99Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 99
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 67.1 m
- To
- 68.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 67.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:67.1-68.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 102.41
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 99 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“99.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.117Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.117
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 67.1 m
- To
- 68.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 67.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:67.1-68.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 102.41
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.117 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.117”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.017Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.017
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 67.1 m
- To
- 68.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 67.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:67.1-68.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 102.41
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.017 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.017 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.017”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.024Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.024
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 67.1 m
- To
- 68.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 67.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:67.1-68.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 102.41
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.024 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.024 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.024”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 28Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 28
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 36.6 m
- To
- 38.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 36.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:36.6-38.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 47.73
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 28 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“28.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.309Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.309
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 36.6 m
- To
- 38.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 36.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:36.6-38.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 47.73
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.309 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.309”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.001Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.001
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 36.6 m
- To
- 38.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 36.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:36.6-38.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 47.73
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.001 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.001 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.001”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.004Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.004
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 36.6 m
- To
- 38.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 36.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:36.6-38.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 47.73
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.004 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.004 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.004”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 28.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 28.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 51.8 m
- To
- 59.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 51.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:51.8-59.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 39.07
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 28.8 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“28.80”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.162Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.162
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 51.8 m
- To
- 59.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 51.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:51.8-59.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 39.07
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.162 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.162”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.005
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 51.8 m
- To
- 59.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 51.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:51.8-59.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 39.07
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.005 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.005 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.005”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.021Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.021
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 51.8 m
- To
- 59.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 51.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:51.8-59.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 39.07
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.021 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.021 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.021”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 27Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 27
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 64 m
- To
- 65.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:64-65.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 29.94
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 27 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“27.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.057Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.057
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 64 m
- To
- 65.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:64-65.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 29.94
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.057 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.057”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.006Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.006
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 64 m
- To
- 65.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:64-65.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 29.94
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.006 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.006 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.006”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.014Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.014
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 64 m
- To
- 65.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:64-65.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 29.94
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.014 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.014 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.014”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 145Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 145
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 27.4 m
- To
- 35.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 27.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:27.4-35.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 148.65
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 145 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“145.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.169Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.169
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 27.4 m
- To
- 35.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 27.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:27.4-35.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 148.65
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.169 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.169”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.009Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.009
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 27.4 m
- To
- 35.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 27.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:27.4-35.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 148.65
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.009 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.009 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.009”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.015Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.015
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 27.4 m
- To
- 35.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 27.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:27.4-35.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 148.65
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.015 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.015 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.015”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 113Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 113
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 29 m
- To
- 30.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 29 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:29-30.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 139.38
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 113 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“113.00”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.473Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.473
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 29 m
- To
- 30.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 29 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:29-30.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 139.38
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.473 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.473”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.005
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 29 m
- To
- 30.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 29 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:29-30.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 139.38
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.005 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.005 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.005”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.014Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.014
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 29 m
- To
- 30.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 29 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:29-30.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 139.38
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.014 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.014 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.014”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 434Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 434
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 32 m
- To
- 33.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:32-33.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 417.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 434 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“434.00”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.123Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.123
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 32 m
- To
- 33.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:32-33.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 417.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.123 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.123”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.026Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.026
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 32 m
- To
- 33.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:32-33.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 417.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.026 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.026 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.026”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.011Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.011
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 32 m
- To
- 33.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:32-33.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 417.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.011 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.011 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.011”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 42.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 42.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 74.7 m
- To
- 77.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 74.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:74.7-77.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 55.13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 42.5 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“42.50”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.209Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.209
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 74.7 m
- To
- 77.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 74.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:74.7-77.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 55.13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.209 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.209”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.006Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.006
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 74.7 m
- To
- 77.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 74.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:74.7-77.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 55.13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.006 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.006 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.006”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.018Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.018
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 74.7 m
- To
- 77.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 74.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:74.7-77.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 55.13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.018 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.018 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.018”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 97Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 97
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 83.8 m
- To
- 85.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:83.8-85.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 103.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 97 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“97.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.165Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.165
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 83.8 m
- To
- 85.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:83.8-85.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 103.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.165 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.165”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.004Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.004
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 83.8 m
- To
- 85.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:83.8-85.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 103.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.004 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.004 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.004”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.016Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.016
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 83.8 m
- To
- 85.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:83.8-85.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 103.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.016 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.016 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.016”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 48.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 48.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 47.2 m
- To
- 50.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 47.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:47.2-50.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 55.54
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 48.5 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“48.50”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.138Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.138
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 47.2 m
- To
- 50.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 47.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:47.2-50.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 55.54
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.138 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.138”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.003Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.003
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 47.2 m
- To
- 50.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 47.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:47.2-50.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 55.54
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.003 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.003 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.003”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.011Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.011
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 47.2 m
- To
- 50.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 47.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:47.2-50.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 55.54
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.011 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.011 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.011”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 53.33Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 53.33
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 62.5 m
- To
- 67.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 62.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:62.5-67.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 53.08
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 53.33 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“53.33”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.029Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.029
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 62.5 m
- To
- 67.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 62.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:62.5-67.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 53.08
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.029 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.029”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.007Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.007
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 62.5 m
- To
- 67.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 62.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:62.5-67.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 53.08
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.007 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.007 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.007”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.023Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.023
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 62.5 m
- To
- 67.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 62.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:62.5-67.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 53.08
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.023 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.023 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.023”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 106.33Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 106.33
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 91.4 m
- To
- 96 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:91.4-96
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 127.22
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 106.33 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“106.33”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.381Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.381
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 91.4 m
- To
- 96 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:91.4-96
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 127.22
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.381 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.381”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.012Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.012
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 91.4 m
- To
- 96 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:91.4-96
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 127.22
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.012 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.012 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.012”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 91.4 m
- To
- 96 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:91.4-96
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 127.22
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.020”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 36Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 36
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 123.4 m
- To
- 125 m
- Intercept Depth
- 123.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:123.4-125
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 49.91
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 36 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“36.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.221Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.221
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 123.4 m
- To
- 125 m
- Intercept Depth
- 123.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:123.4-125
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 49.91
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.221 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.221”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.007Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.007
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 123.4 m
- To
- 125 m
- Intercept Depth
- 123.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:123.4-125
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 49.91
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.007 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.007 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.007”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 123.4 m
- To
- 125 m
- Intercept Depth
- 123.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:123.4-125
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 49.91
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.020”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 21.56Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 13.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 21.56
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 13.7 m
- From
- 35.1 m
- To
- 48.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 35.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:35.1-48.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 31.67
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 21.56 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“21.56”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.131Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 13.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.131
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 13.7 m
- From
- 35.1 m
- To
- 48.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 35.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:35.1-48.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 31.67
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.131 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.131”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.013Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.013
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 13.7 m
- From
- 35.1 m
- To
- 48.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 35.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:35.1-48.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 31.67
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.013 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.013 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.013”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.059Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.059
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 13.7 m
- From
- 35.1 m
- To
- 48.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 35.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:35.1-48.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 31.67
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.059 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.059 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.059”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 76Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 76
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 172.2 m
- To
- 173.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 172.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:172.2-173.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 173.12
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 76 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“76.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 1.46Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.46
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 172.2 m
- To
- 173.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 172.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:172.2-173.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 173.12
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.46 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“1.460”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.013Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.013
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 172.2 m
- To
- 173.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 172.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:172.2-173.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 173.12
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.013 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.013 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.013”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.026Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.026
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 172.2 m
- To
- 173.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 172.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:172.2-173.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 173.12
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.026 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.026 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.026”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 50.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 50.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 123.4 m
- To
- 126.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 123.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:123.4-126.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 64.52
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 50.5 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“50.50”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.229Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.229
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 123.4 m
- To
- 126.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 123.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:123.4-126.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 64.52
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.229 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.229”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.006Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.006
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 123.4 m
- To
- 126.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 123.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:123.4-126.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 64.52
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.006 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.006 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.006”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.033Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.033
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 123.4 m
- To
- 126.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 123.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:123.4-126.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 64.52
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.033 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.033 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.033”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 66.25Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 66.25
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 158.5 m
- To
- 164.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 158.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:158.5-164.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 81.16
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 66.25 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“66.25”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.265Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.265
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 158.5 m
- To
- 164.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 158.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:158.5-164.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 81.16
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.265 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.265”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.005
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 158.5 m
- To
- 164.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 158.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:158.5-164.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 81.16
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.005 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.005 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.005”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.015Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.015
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 158.5 m
- To
- 164.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 158.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:158.5-164.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 81.16
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.015 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.015 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.015”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
include ngCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 130Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- include ng
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 130
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 163.1 m
- To
- 164.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- include ng:163.1-164.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Upper Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 166.03
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 130 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“130.00”
Context: include ng
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
include ngCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.625Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- include ng
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.625
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 163.1 m
- To
- 164.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- include ng:163.1-164.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Upper Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 166.03
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.625 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.625”
Context: include ng
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
include ngCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.009Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- include ng
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.009
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 163.1 m
- To
- 164.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- include ng:163.1-164.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Upper Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 166.03
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.009 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.009 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.009”
Context: include ng
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
include ngCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.017Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- include ng
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.017
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 163.1 m
- To
- 164.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- include ng:163.1-164.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Upper Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 166.03
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.017 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.017 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.017”
Context: include ng
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 19Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 19
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 176.8 m
- To
- 178.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 176.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:176.8-178.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 40.48
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 19 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“19.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.318Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.318
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 176.8 m
- To
- 178.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 176.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:176.8-178.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 40.48
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.318 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.318”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.002Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.002
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 176.8 m
- To
- 178.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 176.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:176.8-178.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 40.48
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.002 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.002 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.002”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 176.8 m
- To
- 178.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 176.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:176.8-178.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 40.48
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.020”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 14.33Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.33
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 182.9 m
- To
- 187.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 182.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:182.9-187.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 29.87
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 14.33 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“14.33”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.218Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.218
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 182.9 m
- To
- 187.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 182.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:182.9-187.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 29.87
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.218 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.218”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.004Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.004
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 182.9 m
- To
- 187.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 182.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:182.9-187.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 29.87
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.004 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.004 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.004”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.038Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.038
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 182.9 m
- To
- 187.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 182.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:182.9-187.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 29.87
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.038 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.038 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.038”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 36.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 36.4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 196.6 m
- To
- 204.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 196.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:196.6-204.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 38.88
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 36.4 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“36.40”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 196.6 m
- To
- 204.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 196.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:196.6-204.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 38.88
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.05 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.050”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.009Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.009
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 196.6 m
- To
- 204.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 196.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:196.6-204.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 38.88
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.009 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.009 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.009”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.028Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.028
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 196.6 m
- To
- 204.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 196.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:196.6-204.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 38.88
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.028 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.028 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.028”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 28Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 28
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 213.4 m
- To
- 214.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 213.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:213.4-214.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 27.33
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 28 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“28.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 213.4 m
- To
- 214.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 213.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:213.4-214.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 27.33
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.01 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.010”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.003Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.003
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 213.4 m
- To
- 214.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 213.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:213.4-214.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 27.33
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.003 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.003 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.003”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.007Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.007
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 213.4 m
- To
- 214.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 213.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:213.4-214.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 27.33
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.007 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.007 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.007”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 70.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 70.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 224 m
- To
- 227.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 224 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:224-227.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 75.62
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 70.5 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“70.50”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.061Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.061
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 224 m
- To
- 227.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 224 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:224-227.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 75.62
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.061 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.061”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.051Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.051
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 224 m
- To
- 227.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 224 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:224-227.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 75.62
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.051 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.051 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.051”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 224 m
- To
- 227.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 224 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:224-227.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 75.62
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.11 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.110”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 95Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 95
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 224 m
- To
- 225.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 224 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:224-225.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 102.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 95 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“95.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.071Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.071
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 224 m
- To
- 225.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 224 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:224-225.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 102.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.071 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.071”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.078Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.078
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 224 m
- To
- 225.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 224 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:224-225.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 102.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.078 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.078 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.078”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.171Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.171
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 224 m
- To
- 225.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 224 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:224-225.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 102.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.171 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.171 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.171”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 35.83Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 35.83
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 100.6 m
- To
- 109.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 100.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:100.6-109.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 41.62
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 35.83 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“35.83”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.107Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.107
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 100.6 m
- To
- 109.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 100.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:100.6-109.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 41.62
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.107 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.107”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.003Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.003
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 100.6 m
- To
- 109.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 100.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:100.6-109.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 41.62
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.003 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.003 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.003”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.015Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.015
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 100.6 m
- To
- 109.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 100.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:100.6-109.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 41.62
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.015 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.015 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.015”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 97Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 97
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 105.2 m
- To
- 106.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 105.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:105.2-106.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 97.88
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 97 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“97.00”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.088Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.088
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 105.2 m
- To
- 106.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 105.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:105.2-106.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 97.88
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.088 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.088”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.006Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.006
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 105.2 m
- To
- 106.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 105.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:105.2-106.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 97.88
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.006 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.006 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.006”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.014Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.014
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 105.2 m
- To
- 106.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 105.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:105.2-106.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 97.88
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.014 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.014 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.014”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 12.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 15.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 15.2 m
- From
- 125 m
- To
- 140.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 125 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:125-140.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 24.83
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 12.4 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“12.40”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.185Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 15.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.185
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 15.2 m
- From
- 125 m
- To
- 140.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 125 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:125-140.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 24.83
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.185 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.185”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.002Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.002
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15.2 m
- From
- 125 m
- To
- 140.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 125 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:125-140.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 24.83
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.002 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.002 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.002”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.013Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.013
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15.2 m
- From
- 125 m
- To
- 140.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 125 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:125-140.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 24.83
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.013 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.013 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.013”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · silverGrade: 19.63Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 12.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.63
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 12.2 m
- From
- 173.7 m
- To
- 185.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 173.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:173.7-185.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 31.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 19.63 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“19.63”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · goldGrade: 0.143Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 12.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.143
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 12.2 m
- From
- 173.7 m
- To
- 185.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 173.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:173.7-185.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 31.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.143 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.143”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · leadGrade: 0.006Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.006
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12.2 m
- From
- 173.7 m
- To
- 185.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 173.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:173.7-185.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 31.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.006 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.006 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.006”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
IntervalCruz de Plata · zincGrade: 0.088Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Interval
- Project
- Cruz de Plata
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- CAPT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.088
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12.2 m
- From
- 173.7 m
- To
- 185.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 173.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Interval:173.7-185.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Bureau Veritas and SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 31.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.088 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.088 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.088”
Context: Interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Looking ahead, we are only getting started on the deeper testing, and plan to expand all our known drilling down to appr"
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.