Cartier announces updated PEA for the Cadillac Project: After-tax NPV5% of C$1.0 billion and after-tax IRR of 26.6% at US$3,600/oz gold price

Original announcement by orestocks on

Company
Cartier Resources Inc.
Ticker
ECR.V
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Quebec, Canada
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Resource update, Economic study, Metallurgy
Extracted
2026-09-19 02:20:57 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Cartier Resources Inc. announced an updated Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) for its Cadillac Project in Quebec, Canada, demonstrating robust economics with an after-tax NPV5% of C$1.0 billion and an IRR of 26.6% at a base case gold price of US$3,600/oz. The study outlines an initial capital expenditure of C$275.8 million and an All-In Sustaining Cost (AISC) of US$2,137/oz over a 16.2-year mine life, producing an average of 100,000 ounces of gold annually with a 95% metallurgical recovery. The PEA incorporates an updated mineral resource estimate and metallurgical testwork, but relies significantly on Inferred resources.

Reasoning: The updated PEA for the Cadillac Project demonstrates robust economics with a strong NPV and IRR, supported by a high gold recovery and low initial capital costs. The study is based on an updated resource estimate and metallurgical testwork, indicating significant progress. However, it remains a PEA, which is an early-stage study, and relies heavily on Inferred resources, which carry higher geological uncertainty. The project's location in Quebec, Canada, is a favorable jurisdiction.

Positive factors

  • Robust after-tax NPV5% of C$1.0 billion and IRR of 26.6% at base case gold price of US$3,600/oz.
  • Low initial CAPEX of C$275.8 M for an underground operation.
  • High metallurgical recovery of 95% for gold.
  • Significant resource growth potential and exploration upside along the Cadillac Fault mentioned.

Negative factors

  • Study is at the PEA level, which is conceptual and not bankable.
  • Material portion of the resource is in the Inferred category (35.2 Mt at 2.1 g/t Au), which is too speculative for economic studies.
  • No explicit disclosure of the effective tax rate or closure funding mechanism.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 15

Classification and evidence

PEA Onlyneutral

Only Class 4 / Initial Assessment economics available. Not bankable.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that the results are from an 'updated Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA)'.

Evidence · text

“Cartier announces updated PEA for the Cadillac Project”

High IRRpositive

Post-tax real unlevered IRR in the strong tier or better.

Why it applies: The after-tax IRR of 26.6% is above the strong tier threshold for economic studies.

Evidence · table

“26.6%”

Context: After-tax Internal Rate of Return

Fast Paybackpositive

Payback in the strong tier or better, on the required basis.

Why it applies: The after-tax payback period of 4.3 years is within the strong tier for economic studies.

Evidence · table

“4.3”

Context: After-tax Payback Period

Conservative Pricingpositive

Conservative on the worst of the spot, 3-year and consensus comparisons.

Why it applies: The base case gold price of US$3,600/oz is below the spot price of US$4,300/oz mentioned in the highlights, indicating a conservative approach.

Evidence · text

“After-tax NPV5% of C$1,001 M and after-tax IRR of 26.6% at a base case gold price of US$3,600/oz and an exchange rate of 1.38 C$/US$. At a spot gold price of US$4,300/oz, after-tax NPV5% increases to C$1,565 M and after-tax IRR increases to 37.3%.”

Inferred Heavy Feednegative

Material Inferred share of LOM mill feed, or the share is undisclosed.

Why it applies: The PEA includes Inferred Mineral Resources, which are considered too speculative geologically for economic studies, and the total Inferred resource is significantly larger than the M&I resource.

Evidence · text

“The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes Inferred Mineral Resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as Mineral Reserves, and there is no certainty that the results of the PEA will be realized.”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The PEA was prepared by independent QPs as defined by NI 43-101, and specific QPs are named for different sections.

Evidence · text

“The updated PEA was prepared by independent consulting firms with the respective responsibilities set out in Table 8. ... The PEA was prepared by consultants who are independent of Cartier, each of whom are Qualified Persons (″QP″) as defined by NI 43-101”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The PEA was prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (″NI 43-101″).

Evidence · text

“The updated PEA was prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (″NI 43-101″)”

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: A gold recovery of 95% is stated, which is at the exceptional band for mill/CIL processing.

Evidence · text

“a gold recovery of 95% could be achieved at a grind size P80 of 50 µm.”

Pilot Scale Completepositive

Pilot or demonstration plant testing completed under continuous operation.

Why it applies: The metallurgical testwork program included a series of tests on six variability samples and established design criteria, indicating a detailed level of testing.

Evidence · text

“To complete the process plant design and determine metallurgical performance, a series of tests were performed on six variability samples: two from each of the three main zones, Chimo, East Chimo, and West Nordeau.”

Multi-Domain Testedpositive

Variability across ore domains (oxide, transition, fresh) has been addressed.

Why it applies: Tests were performed on six variability samples, two from each of the three main zones (Chimo, East Chimo, and West Nordeau), indicating coverage of different ore domains.

Evidence · text

“To complete the process plant design and determine metallurgical performance, a series of tests were performed on six variability samples: two from each of the three main zones, Chimo, East Chimo, and West Nordeau.”

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The PEA incorporates an 'updated mineral resource estimate announced on December 18, 2025'.

Evidence · text

“It incorporates the updated mineral resource estimate announced on December 18, 2025”

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: A current resource fact retains the disclosed cut-off grade

Gravity Routeneutral

Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.

Why it applies: the document describes a gravity route ("gravity")

Single Domain Onlynegative

Testing limited to one composite or domain — representativeness not established.

Why it applies: only one composite was tested

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 13. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (12)

measuredCadillac Project · goldTonnes: 5988000Grade: 2.61Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 502600Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cadillac Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Quebec, Canada
Ticker
ECR.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Pierre Luc Richard, Stephen Coates
Resource group id
resource:75e8e29d7145833278e5
Deposit or zone
Total
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
5988000
Grade
2.61
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
502600
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-18

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Measured resource category represents the highest level of geological confidence, providing a solid foundation for future studies. The grade is also favorable for a gold project.

Positive factors

  • Measured resource category indicates high geological confidence.
  • Good grade for an underground gold project.

Evidence · table

“Measured | 1,770,000 | 2.16 | 123,300 | 4,210,000 | 2.80 | 379,300 | 5,988,000 | 2.61 | 502,600”

Context: All sectors / Category | Open Pit Resources | Underground Resources | Total — Total

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedCadillac Project · goldTonnes: 3965000Grade: 2.08Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 265200Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cadillac Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Quebec, Canada
Ticker
ECR.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Pierre Luc Richard, Stephen Coates
Resource group id
resource:7f7832ca8f1647dc2145
Deposit or zone
Total
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
3965000
Grade
2.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
265200
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-18

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated resource category signifies a good level of geological confidence, suitable for pre-feasibility studies. The grade is also positive for a gold project.

Positive factors

  • Indicated resource category provides reasonable geological confidence.
  • Favorable grade for a gold project.

Evidence · table

“Indicated | 1,730,000 | 1.52 | 84,500 | 2,240,000 | 2.51 | 180,600 | 3,965,000 | 2.08 | 265,200”

Context: All sectors / Category | Open Pit Resources | Underground Resources | Total — Total

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredCadillac Project · goldTonnes: 35185000Grade: 2.14Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2416900Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cadillac Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Quebec, Canada
Ticker
ECR.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Pierre Luc Richard, Stephen Coates
Resource group id
resource:cde44c4ab17a9587e13d
Deposit or zone
Total
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
35185000
Grade
2.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
2416900
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-18

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The large Inferred resource base suggests substantial upside potential for the project. However, the speculative nature of Inferred resources means there is considerable geological uncertainty, and further drilling is required to upgrade these resources to higher confidence categories.

Positive factors

  • Large contained gold ounces in the Inferred category indicate significant exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category is speculative and cannot be used for economic studies alone.
  • High proportion of Inferred resources relative to Measured and Indicated.

Evidence · table

“Inferred | 4,740,000 | 1.13 | 172,600 | 30,450,000 | 2.29 | 2,244,200 | 35,185,000 | 2.14 | 2,416,900”

Context: All sectors / Category | Open Pit Resources | Underground Resources | Total — Total

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredCadillac Project · goldTonnes: 1770000Grade: 2.16Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 123300Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cadillac Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Quebec, Canada
Ticker
ECR.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Pierre Luc Richard, Stephen Coates
Resource group id
resource:cf891c6006ad344f7dc6
Deposit or zone
Open Pit
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
1770000
Grade
2.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
123300
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-18

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Measured resource in the open pit scenario provides high confidence for potential early-stage development. The grade is also attractive for an open pit operation.

Positive factors

  • Measured resource category for open pit indicates high confidence.
  • Good grade for an open pit gold project.

Evidence · table

“Measured | 1,770,000 | 2.16 | 123,300 | 4,210,000 | 2.80 | 379,300 | 5,988,000 | 2.61 | 502,600”

Context: All sectors / Category | Open Pit Resources | Underground Resources | Total — Open Pit

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedCadillac Project · goldTonnes: 1730000Grade: 1.52Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 84500Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cadillac Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Quebec, Canada
Ticker
ECR.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Pierre Luc Richard, Stephen Coates
Resource group id
resource:061bf24b0bcb2238df4e
Deposit or zone
Open Pit
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1730000
Grade
1.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
84500
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-18

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated resource in the open pit scenario offers a good level of confidence for further evaluation. The grade is moderate for an open pit gold project.

Positive factors

  • Indicated resource category for open pit provides reasonable confidence.

Evidence · table

“Indicated | 1,730,000 | 1.52 | 84,500 | 2,240,000 | 2.51 | 180,600 | 3,965,000 | 2.08 | 265,200”

Context: All sectors / Category | Open Pit Resources | Underground Resources | Total — Open Pit

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredCadillac Project · goldTonnes: 4740000Grade: 1.13Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 172600Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cadillac Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Quebec, Canada
Ticker
ECR.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Pierre Luc Richard, Stephen Coates
Resource group id
resource:bb8e77b3af1b5381425d
Deposit or zone
Open Pit
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
4740000
Grade
1.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
172600
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-18

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred open pit resource contributes to the overall project scale but carries higher uncertainty due to its classification and lower grade, requiring further drilling for confirmation.

Positive factors

  • Contained gold ounces in the Inferred category add to overall project potential.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category is speculative and has lower confidence.
  • Lower grade for an open pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“Inferred | 4,740,000 | 1.13 | 172,600 | 30,450,000 | 2.29 | 2,244,200 | 35,185,000 | 2.14 | 2,416,900”

Context: All sectors / Category | Open Pit Resources | Underground Resources | Total — Open Pit

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredCadillac Project · goldTonnes: 4210000Grade: 2.8Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 379300Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cadillac Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Quebec, Canada
Ticker
ECR.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Pierre Luc Richard, Stephen Coates
Resource group id
resource:9fe19488395c053a25b3
Deposit or zone
Underground
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
4210000
Grade
2.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
379300
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-18

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Measured underground resource provides a high level of confidence and a favorable grade, which is crucial for underground mining economics.

Positive factors

  • Measured resource category for underground indicates high geological confidence.
  • Good grade for an underground gold project.

Evidence · table

“Measured | 1,770,000 | 2.16 | 123,300 | 4,210,000 | 2.80 | 379,300 | 5,988,000 | 2.61 | 502,600”

Context: All sectors / Category | Open Pit Resources | Underground Resources | Total — Underground

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedCadillac Project · goldTonnes: 2240000Grade: 2.51Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 180600Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cadillac Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Quebec, Canada
Ticker
ECR.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Pierre Luc Richard, Stephen Coates
Resource group id
resource:281c5242d27dfbc1cbb5
Deposit or zone
Underground
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
2240000
Grade
2.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
180600
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-18

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated underground resource offers a good level of confidence and a favorable grade, supporting further development studies.

Positive factors

  • Indicated resource category for underground provides reasonable confidence.
  • Favorable grade for an underground gold project.

Evidence · table

“Indicated | 1,730,000 | 1.52 | 84,500 | 2,240,000 | 2.51 | 180,600 | 3,965,000 | 2.08 | 265,200”

Context: All sectors / Category | Open Pit Resources | Underground Resources | Total — Underground

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredCadillac Project · goldTonnes: 30450000Grade: 2.29Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2244200Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cadillac Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Quebec, Canada
Ticker
ECR.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Pierre Luc Richard, Stephen Coates
Resource group id
resource:d1903663411943108a99
Deposit or zone
Underground
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
30450000
Grade
2.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
2244200
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-18

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The substantial Inferred underground resource provides significant long-term potential for the project. However, its speculative nature means that considerable de-risking through further drilling is required before it can be fully integrated into definitive economic studies.

Positive factors

  • Large contained gold ounces in the Inferred category for underground mining indicate significant potential.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category is speculative and has lower confidence.
  • Reliance on Inferred resources for underground mining carries higher risk.

Evidence · table

“Inferred | 4,740,000 | 1.13 | 172,600 | 30,450,000 | 2.29 | 2,244,200 | 35,185,000 | 2.14 | 2,416,900”

Context: All sectors / Category | Open Pit Resources | Underground Resources | Total — Underground

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedCadillac Project · goldTonnes: 3500000Grade: 1.84Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 207800Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cadillac Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
ECR.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:20371939820c11ada628
Deposit or zone
Open Pit
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
3500000
Grade
1.84
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
207800
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-18

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Explicit estimate recovered from a grouped resource table.

Evidence · table

“Measured & Indicated | 3,500,000 | 1.84 | 207,800 | 6,450,000 | 2.70 | 559,900 | 9,953,000 | 2.40 | 767,800”

Context: All sectors / Category | Open Pit Resources | Underground Resources | Total — Open Pit

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedCadillac Project · goldTonnes: 6450000Grade: 2.7Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 559900Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cadillac Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
ECR.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:255da5d80f5eceaf90fe
Deposit or zone
Underground
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6450000
Grade
2.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
559900
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-18

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Explicit estimate recovered from a grouped resource table.

Evidence · table

“Measured & Indicated | 3,500,000 | 1.84 | 207,800 | 6,450,000 | 2.70 | 559,900 | 9,953,000 | 2.40 | 767,800”

Context: All sectors / Category | Open Pit Resources | Underground Resources | Total — Underground

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedCadillac Project · goldTonnes: 9953000Grade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 767800Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cadillac Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
ECR.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:c52b9f65fb21b1ee2e5a
Deposit or zone
Total
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
9953000
Grade
2.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
767800
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-18

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Explicit estimate recovered from a grouped resource table.

Evidence · table

“Measured & Indicated | 3,500,000 | 1.84 | 207,800 | 6,450,000 | 2.70 | 559,900 | 9,953,000 | 2.40 | 767,800”

Context: All sectors / Category | Open Pit Resources | Underground Resources | Total — Total

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Metallurgical Results (1)

conventional flowsheetCadillac Project · goldRecovery: 95 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cadillac Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Quebec, Canada
Ticker
ECR.V

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
conventional flowsheet
Processing Route
crushing, grinding, gravity concentration and cyanide leaching
Sample
six variability samples from Chimo, East Chimo, and West Nordeau zones
Grind P80
50 µm

Recovery

Recovery
95 %
Recovery Basis
unspecified

Lab

Consultant
Soutex Inc.

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Source describes recovery that could be achieved, supported by variability testwork.

Evidence · text

“To complete the process plant design and determine metallurgical performance, a series of tests were performed on six variability samples: two from each of the three main zones, Chimo, East Chimo, and West Nordeau. The samples were selected from exploration drill core and are considered representative of the mineral resources. The test program included mineralogy, geochemistry, grindability, gold recovery, and tailings detoxification. The results indicate that, based on the average resource grade, a gold recovery of 95% could be achieved at a grind size P80 of 50 µm. The tests also established the required grinding energy, gold recovery equipment criteria, and reagent dosage design criteria.”

Tags used in scoring

Gravity Routeneutral

Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.

Why it applies: processing_route matches the gravity signal

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 95% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.