# CBLT Announces Assay Results from Shatford Lake \(Lithium\) Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/cblt-announces-assay-results-from-shatford-lake-lithium--5cf7e82a-dd84-4193-a0d9-5cc4950daa26 Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/CBLT/news/4706280845165891/cblt-announces-assay-results-from-shatford-lake-lithium Publisher: tmx Original announcement: 2023-07-31T11:30:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: Unknown date Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date - Company: CBLT Inc. - Ticker: CBLT - Exchange: TSX - Region: Manitoba - Primary commodity: Lithium - Secondary commodities: Tin, Tantalum, Rubidium - Document categories: Drill results, Other - Extracted: 2026-09-17 15:42:52 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.40 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary CBLT Inc. has reported multi-element anomalies including lithium, tin, tantalum, and rubidium from ten grab samples collected at Shatford Lake, Manitoba. The pegmatite occurrences are located near the significant Tanco Mine, suggesting potential for LCT-style mineralization. Reasoning: The release reports encouraging multi-element surface anomalies in pegmatites near a major LCT deposit, though the lack of specific numeric grades for the lithium itself limits immediate valuation. - Positive factor: Multi-element anomalies \(Li, Sn, Ta, Rb\) identified - Positive factor: Proximity to high-grade Tanco Mine - Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed with accredited lab and QP sign-off - Positive factor: Geological indicators \(rubidium enrichment\) suggest fractionation - Negative factor: Results are from surface grab samples, which are random and may not reflect true mineralization - Negative factor: No specific lithium grades provided in the text \(only 'local anomalous lithium'\) Facts used in scoring: 4 ## Classification and evidence **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: Release mentions samples were analyzed by AGAT Labs \(independent accredited lab\) and overseen by a P.Geo. Evidence · text > Samples were analyzed by AGAT Labs in Mississauga, Ontario, an independent accredited lab **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: The project's value premise is heavily tied to its proximity to the Tanco Mine. Evidence · text > The proximity to the Tanco Mine is important to CBLT. ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 4. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Drill Results (4) ### Fact 1 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/cblt-announces-assay-results-from-shatford-lake-lithium--5cf7e82a-dd84-4193-a0d9-5cc4950daa26#fact-drill-facts-0) lithium #### Identity - Commodity: lithium - Region: canada\_mb - Reported Region: canada\_mb - Ticker: CBLT #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Location: southeast Shatford Lake - Loc. Source: document #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2023-07-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Anomalous lithium was noted, but the absence of numeric assay values prevents technical assessment. - Positive factor: Anomalous lithium identified in pegmatite outcrops - Negative factor: No specific grade or width provided - Negative factor: Surface grab samples are inherently random Evidence · text > Pegmatite occurrences thus far sampled in CBLT's claims contain anomalous tin, tantalum, and rubidium with local anomalous lithium. #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### Fact 2 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/cblt-announces-assay-results-from-shatford-lake-lithium--5cf7e82a-dd84-4193-a0d9-5cc4950daa26#fact-drill-facts-1) tin #### Identity - Commodity: tin - Region: canada\_mb - Reported Region: canada\_mb - Ticker: CBLT #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Location: southeast Shatford Lake - Loc. Source: document #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2023-07-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Anomalous tin detected in surface samples. - Positive factor: Anomalous tin identified Evidence · text > Pegmatite occurrences thus far sampled in CBLT's claims contain anomalous tin, tantalum, and rubidium with local anomalous lithium. #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### Fact 3 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/cblt-announces-assay-results-from-shatford-lake-lithium--5cf7e82a-dd84-4193-a0d9-5cc4950daa26#fact-drill-facts-2) tantalum #### Identity - Commodity: tantalum - Region: canada\_mb - Reported Region: canada\_mb - Ticker: CBLT #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Location: southeast Shatford Lake - Loc. Source: document #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2023-07-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Anomalous tantalum detected in surface samples. - Positive factor: Anomalous tantalum identified Evidence · text > Pegmatite occurrences thus far sampled in CBLT's claims contain anomalous tin, tantalum, and rubidium with local anomalous lithium. #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### Fact 4 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/cblt-announces-assay-results-from-shatford-lake-lithium--5cf7e82a-dd84-4193-a0d9-5cc4950daa26#fact-drill-facts-3) rubidium #### Identity - Commodity: rubidium - Region: canada\_mb - Reported Region: canada\_mb - Ticker: CBLT #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Location: southeast Shatford Lake - Loc. Source: document #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2023-07-31T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Rubidium enrichment is a positive indicator of pegmatite fractionation. - Positive factor: Rubidium enrichment noted as a vector for lithium Evidence · text > Rubidium is enriched in most of the recent samples, which could indicate a high degree of fractionation in the pegmatites and be used as a vector towards lithium or other rare element mineralization. #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.