# CENTURY LITHIUM FILES TECHNICAL REPORT ON THE FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE ANGEL ISLAND LITHIUM PROJECT, NEVADA

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/century-lithium-files-technical-report-on-the-feasibility-study-for-the-angel-is--ab9d8f5d-b5b7-4eb8-99cb-93236789dce9

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/LCE/news/6620835317980903/century-lithium-files-technical-report-on-the-feasibility-study-for-the-angel-is

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2026-03-09T17:45:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Century Lithium Corp.

- Ticker: LCE

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Nevada

- Primary commodity: Lithium

- Secondary commodities: Sodium hydroxide

- Document categories: Resource update, Economic study

- Extracted: 2026-09-18 06:51:55 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.80 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Century Lithium has filed a Feasibility Study for its 100%-owned Angel Island Lithium Project in Nevada. The study reports an after-tax NPV of $4.01 billion and an IRR of 27.4%, supported by Proven and Probable reserves and a projected mine life of over 60 years.

Reasoning: The announcement of a Feasibility Study for a large-scale lithium project with high IRR and significant NPV, supported by pilot plant validation, represents a major project milestone.

- Positive factor: Strong after-tax NPV of $4.01 billion

- Positive factor: High IRR of 27.4%

- Positive factor: Very long mine life exceeding 60 years

- Positive factor: Proven and Probable reserves established

- Positive factor: Integrated processing with co-product credits \(sodium hydroxide\) potentially reducing net OPEX to below zero

Facts used in scoring: 3

## Classification and evidence

**PFS Complete**

Polarity: positive

Definition: AACE Class 3 study complete.

Why it applies: The document announces a Feasibility Study \(FS\), which is a higher level of maturity than PFS, but fits the engineering maturity described.

Evidence · text

> FEASIBILITY STUDY OF THE CLAYTON VALLEY LITHIUM PROJECT

**High IRR**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Post-tax real unlevered IRR in the strong tier or better.

Why it applies: The reported after-tax IRR of 27.4% is in the strong tier for a lithium development project.

Evidence · text

> after-tax cash flow has a 27.4% Internal Rate of Return \("IRR"\)

**Long Reserve Life**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reserve life index in the top tier of the single ladder.

Why it applies: The project supports a mine life exceeding 60 years, which is in the top tier.

Evidence · text

> supporting a mine life exceeding 60 years

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The report was prepared in accordance with NI 43-101.

Evidence · text

> prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 \(NI 43-101\)

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (2)

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/century-lithium-files-technical-report-on-the-feasibility-study-for-the-angel-is--ab9d8f5d-b5b7-4eb8-99cb-93236789dce9#fact-resource-facts-1)

Angel Island Lithium Project · lithium

#### Identity

- Project: Angel Island Lithium Project
- Commodity: lithium
- Region: usa\_nv
- Reported Region: Nevada
- Ticker: LCE

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-01-03T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Richard W. Jolk
- Resource group id: resource:207d2bb3603551c0e941
- Ownership percent: 100 %

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 1138000000
- Grade: 966
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Contained Metal: 5852000
- Contained Unit: t lce

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-01-03

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant lithium resource and reserve reported.

- Positive factor: Large scale resource

Evidence · text

> Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources of 1.138 billion t at 966 parts per million \("ppm"\) lithium, containing 5.852 million t lithium carbonate equivalent \("LCE"\)

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### probable

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/century-lithium-files-technical-report-on-the-feasibility-study-for-the-angel-is--ab9d8f5d-b5b7-4eb8-99cb-93236789dce9#fact-resource-facts-2)

Angel Island Lithium Project · lithium

#### Identity

- Project: Angel Island Lithium Project
- Commodity: lithium
- Region: usa\_nv
- Reported Region: Nevada
- Ticker: LCE

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: reserve
- Effective date: 2026-01-03T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Richard W. Jolk
- Resource group id: resource:c0aec8f06ec1de8747d6
- Ownership percent: 100 %

#### Resource Data

- Category: probable
- Tonnes: 287650000
- Grade: 1149
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Contained Metal: 1759000
- Contained Unit: t lce

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-01-03

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant lithium reserve reported.

- Positive factor: Significant reserve base

Evidence · text

> Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves of 287.65 million t at 1,149 ppm lithium, containing 1.759 million t LCE

#### Tags used in scoring

**Probable Reserve**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
