CERRO LEON DRILL RESULTS
Original announcement by research on
- Company
- Unico Silver Limited
- Ticker
- USL
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Santa Cruz province, Argentina
- Primary commodity
- Silver
- Secondary commodities
- Gold, Lead, Zinc
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-11-07 11:00:43 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Unico Silver reported first assay results from the current Cerro Leon drilling program, highlighting several high-grade silver equivalent intercepts at the Karina prospect. The company says the shallow RC program is aimed at upgrading mineralisation and helping define grade distribution ahead of deeper drilling and a revised MRE. Assays remain pending for 42 additional holes, so this is an interim results release rather than a completed program.
Reasoning: This is a drill-results release with several significant silver equivalent intercepts at Karina, but much of the program is still pending and the current results are from a shallow RC campaign aimed partly at resource upgrade.
Positive factors
- First assay results from ongoing drilling
- Multiple high-grade silver equivalent intercepts returned at Karina
- Program is designed to upgrade shallow mineralisation and define grade distribution
- Reported intercepts include high-grade subintervals and an exceptional individual silver assay
Negative factors
- Assays are still pending for a further 42 holes
- Intervals are reported as downhole lengths and true widths are only approximate or estimated in places
- Cut-off grade and compositing details are only partly disclosed through the JORC notes
Facts used in scoring: 64
Classification and evidence
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: The release states that all drill holes were orientated perpendicular to the Karina vein and approximate true widths, and that PR005-24 was oblique with true widths estimated to be 50% of the stated intervals.
Evidence · text
“All drill holes were orientated perpendicular to the Karina vein and approximate true widths.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release describes blanks, standards, duplicates, CRM checks and laboratory QA/QC procedures for the 2024 RC campaign.
Evidence · text
“For drilling campaign during 2024 (RC) were inserted 8 controls per 100 samples.”
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: The report states that mineralised drill hole intercepts are calculated using greater than 50gpt AgEq with no more than 3m of internal dilution.
Evidence · text
“Mineralised drill hole intercepts are calculated using greater than 50gpt AgEq with no more than 3m of internal dilution.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Most intercepts are reported as downhole lengths, and while the holes are said to be approximately true width, one interval is explicitly oblique and only estimated to be 50% of the stated interval.
Evidence · text
“This hole intercepted the Marta Este vein oblique to the vein orientation and true widths are estimated to be 50% of the stated intervals.”
Step Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The company says PR009-24 is 100m east-northeast of historical hole PR224-12, confirming lateral continuity of high-grade mineralisation.
Evidence · text
“Hole PR009-24 is located 100m east-northeast of historical hole PR224-12”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The program objective includes upgrading shallow mineralisation from inferred to indicated status and improving resource confidence.
Evidence · text
“Upgrade shallow mineralisation from inferred to indicated status”
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: The project is described as strategically located within the same structural corridor as AngloGold Ashanti’s Cerro Vanguardia mine.
Evidence · text
“within the same structural corridor that is host to AngloGold Ashanti’s world-class Cerro Vanguardia mine”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 64. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (64)
PR001-24Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR001-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 44 m
- To
- 48 m
- Intercept Depth
- 44 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR001-24:44-48
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Karina
- Easting
- 526792.1
- Northing
- 4682827
- CRS
- UTM19s
- Elevation
- 405.6 m
- Azimuth
- 14 °
- Dip
- -57 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, mercury
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 73
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 50
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: This is a low but meaningful accompanying silver grade from the same interval; it adds supporting data rather than standalone strength.
Positive factors
- Associated with the same mineralized interval as the AgEq intercept
- Supports a polymetallic silver-gold system
Negative factors
- The interval is low-grade relative to the headline AgEq value
- Downhole width only
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
PR001-24Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR001-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 44 m
- To
- 48 m
- Intercept Depth
- 44 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR001-24:44-48
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Karina
- Easting
- 526792.1
- Northing
- 4682827
- CRS
- UTM19s
- Elevation
- 405.6 m
- Azimuth
- 14 °
- Dip
- -57 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, mercury
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 73
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 50
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: The gold grade is modest but relevant because it contributes to the reported silver equivalent for this interval.
Positive factors
- Gold credits are reported within the same mineralized interval
- Polymetallic nature supports the AgEq calculation
Negative factors
- Grade is modest on its own
- Downhole width only
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
PR001-24Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 127Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR001-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 127
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 70 m
- To
- 72 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR001-24:70-72
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Karina
- Easting
- 526792.1
- Northing
- 4682827
- CRS
- UTM19s
- Elevation
- 405.6 m
- Azimuth
- 14 °
- Dip
- -57 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, mercury
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 127
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 50
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: This is a short but solid higher-grade interval that exceeds the stated cut-off and supports the shallow mineralized shoot model.
Positive factors
- High-grade silver equivalent interval above cut-off
- Adds breadth to the Karina result set
Negative factors
- Short 2 m downhole interval
- True width not given
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
PR001-24Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR001-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.93
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 70 m
- To
- 72 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR001-24:70-72
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Karina
- Easting
- 526792.1
- Northing
- 4682827
- CRS
- UTM19s
- Elevation
- 405.6 m
- Azimuth
- 14 °
- Dip
- -57 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, mercury
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 127
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 50
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: The gold grade is respectable for a narrow subinterval and helps explain the high AgEq value, but by itself it is not a large interval.
Positive factors
- Gold contributes to the silver equivalent result
- Short high-grade subinterval within the same intercept
Negative factors
- Very narrow interval
- Downhole width only
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
PR002-24Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR002-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 22 m
- To
- 27 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR002-24:22-27
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Karina
- Easting
- 526847.4
- Northing
- 4682843
- CRS
- UTM19s
- Elevation
- 403.7 m
- Azimuth
- 340 °
- Dip
- -52 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, mercury
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 58
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 50
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: This is a small but still above-cutoff intercept that contributes to continuity of the shallow mineralized zone.
Positive factors
- Above the stated 50 g/t AgEq cut-off
- Adds continuity between holes
Negative factors
- Modest grade relative to the stronger intervals in the release
- Downhole interval only
Evidence · table
“PR002-24 22 27 5 0.24 22 0.5 0.1 58 290”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR002-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
PR002-24Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR002-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 98
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17 m
- From
- 34 m
- To
- 51 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR002-24:34-51
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Karina
- Easting
- 526847.4
- Northing
- 4682843
- CRS
- UTM19s
- Elevation
- 403.7 m
- Azimuth
- 340 °
- Dip
- -52 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, mercury
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 149
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 50
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: This is a decent silver interval that sits inside a longer mineralized zone and reinforces the broader result.
Positive factors
- Solid silver grade within a 17 m intercept
- Supports grade continuity
Negative factors
- Still below the headline AgEq grade thickness of the release
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
PR002-24Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR002-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17 m
- From
- 34 m
- To
- 51 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR002-24:34-51
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Karina
- Easting
- 526847.4
- Northing
- 4682843
- CRS
- UTM19s
- Elevation
- 403.7 m
- Azimuth
- 340 °
- Dip
- -52 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, mercury
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 149
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 50
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: The gold grade is modest but contributes to the overall polymetallic interval.
Positive factors
- Contributes to the silver equivalent calculation
- Part of a longer interval supporting continuity
Negative factors
- Low standalone gold grade
- Downhole width only
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
PR002-24Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR002-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 17 m
- From
- 34 m
- To
- 51 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR002-24:34-51
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Karina
- Easting
- 526847.4
- Northing
- 4682843
- CRS
- UTM19s
- Elevation
- 403.7 m
- Azimuth
- 340 °
- Dip
- -52 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, mercury
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 149
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 50
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Lead is present in the polymetallic interval, but its standalone significance is limited and the report notes credits are only considered at Marta Centro.
Positive factors
- Lead is explicitly included in the AgEq formula and credits are considered at Cerro Leon
Negative factors
- Potential smelter penalty element; economic value is stated to be prospect-specific in the report
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
PR002-24Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR002-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 17 m
- From
- 34 m
- To
- 51 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR002-24:34-51
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Karina
- Easting
- 526847.4
- Northing
- 4682843
- CRS
- UTM19s
- Elevation
- 403.7 m
- Azimuth
- 340 °
- Dip
- -52 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony, mercury
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 149
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 50
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Zinc is part of the same polymetallic interval, but the release makes clear the economic treatment depends on the prospect.
Positive factors
- Zinc is explicitly included in the AgEq formula and credits are considered at Cerro Leon
Negative factors
- Potential smelter penalty element; economic value is stated to be prospect-specific in the report
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
PR002-24Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR002-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.24
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 22 m
- To
- 27 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR002-24:22-27
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 58
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.24 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.24 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR002-24 22 27 5 0.24 22 0.5 0.1 58 290”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR002-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR002-24Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR002-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 22 m
- To
- 27 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR002-24:22-27
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 58
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.5 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR002-24 22 27 5 0.24 22 0.5 0.1 58 290”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR002-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR002-24Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR002-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 22 m
- To
- 27 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR002-24:22-27
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 58
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR002-24 22 27 5 0.24 22 0.5 0.1 58 290”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR002-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Inc.Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17 m
- From
- 34 m
- To
- 51 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Inc.:34-51
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 149
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.33 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 5.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.33 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 34 51 17 0.33 98 0.8 0.1 149 2529”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · Inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Inc.Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 98
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17 m
- From
- 34 m
- To
- 51 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Inc.:34-51
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 149
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 98 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1666.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 34 51 17 0.33 98 0.8 0.1 149 2529”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · Inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Inc.Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 17 m
- From
- 34 m
- To
- 51 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Inc.:34-51
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 149
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 13.6 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 34 51 17 0.33 98 0.8 0.1 149 2529”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · Inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Inc.Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 17 m
- From
- 34 m
- To
- 51 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Inc.:34-51
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 149
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.7 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 34 51 17 0.33 98 0.8 0.1 149 2529”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · Inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR003-24Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR003-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 49 m
- To
- 61 m
- Intercept Depth
- 49 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR003-24:49-61
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 307
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.25 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR003-24 49 61 12 0.25 260 0.3 0.5 307 3688”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR003-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR003-24Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 260Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR003-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 260
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 49 m
- To
- 61 m
- Intercept Depth
- 49 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR003-24:49-61
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 307
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 260 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3120.0 g/t·m is strong.
Positive factors
- 260 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR003-24 49 61 12 0.25 260 0.3 0.5 307 3688”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR003-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR003-24Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR003-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 49 m
- To
- 61 m
- Intercept Depth
- 49 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR003-24:49-61
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 307
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR003-24 49 61 12 0.25 260 0.3 0.5 307 3688”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR003-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR003-24Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR003-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 49 m
- To
- 61 m
- Intercept Depth
- 49 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR003-24:49-61
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 307
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 6.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.5 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR003-24 49 61 12 0.25 260 0.3 0.5 307 3688”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR003-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Inc.Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.78
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 56 m
- To
- 59 m
- Intercept Depth
- 56 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Inc.:56-59
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1052
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.78 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.78 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 56 59 3 0.78 930 0.5 1.2 1052 3157”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · Inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Inc.Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 930Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 930
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 56 m
- To
- 59 m
- Intercept Depth
- 56 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Inc.:56-59
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1052
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 930 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2790.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 930 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 56 59 3 0.78 930 0.5 1.2 1052 3157”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · Inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Inc.Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 56 m
- To
- 59 m
- Intercept Depth
- 56 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Inc.:56-59
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1052
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.5 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 56 59 3 0.78 930 0.5 1.2 1052 3157”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · Inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Inc.Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 56 m
- To
- 59 m
- Intercept Depth
- 56 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Inc.:56-59
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1052
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.2 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.2 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 56 59 3 0.78 930 0.5 1.2 1052 3157”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · Inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR004-24Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR004-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 23 m
- From
- 30 m
- To
- 53 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR004-24:30-53
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 104
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.75 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR004-24 30 53 23 0.75 27 0.5 0.1 104 2386”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR004-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR004-24Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR004-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 23 m
- From
- 30 m
- To
- 53 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR004-24:30-53
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 104
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 27 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 621.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR004-24 30 53 23 0.75 27 0.5 0.1 104 2386”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR004-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR004-24Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 23 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR004-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 23 m
- From
- 30 m
- To
- 53 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR004-24:30-53
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 104
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 11.5 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR004-24 30 53 23 0.75 27 0.5 0.1 104 2386”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR004-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR004-24Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 23 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR004-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 23 m
- From
- 30 m
- To
- 53 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR004-24:30-53
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 104
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR004-24 30 53 23 0.75 27 0.5 0.1 104 2386”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR004-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Inc.Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 4.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 36 m
- To
- 39 m
- Intercept Depth
- 36 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Inc.:36-39
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 376
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.1 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 12.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 36 39 3 4.1 21 0.9 0.1 376 1128”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · Inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Inc.Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 36 m
- To
- 39 m
- Intercept Depth
- 36 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Inc.:36-39
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 376
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 63.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 21 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 36 39 3 4.1 21 0.9 0.1 376 1128”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · Inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Inc.Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 36 m
- To
- 39 m
- Intercept Depth
- 36 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Inc.:36-39
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 376
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2.7 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.9 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 36 39 3 4.1 21 0.9 0.1 376 1128”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · Inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Inc.Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 36 m
- To
- 39 m
- Intercept Depth
- 36 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Inc.:36-39
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 376
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 36 39 3 4.1 21 0.9 0.1 376 1128”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · Inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR005-24Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 3.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR005-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 18 m
- To
- 30 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR005-24:18-30
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 411
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.34 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 40.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR005-24 18 30 12 3.34 89 2 0.1 411 4935”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR005-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR005-24Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR005-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 89
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 18 m
- To
- 30 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR005-24:18-30
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 411
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 89 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1068.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR005-24 18 30 12 3.34 89 2 0.1 411 4935”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR005-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR005-24Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR005-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 18 m
- To
- 30 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR005-24:18-30
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 411
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 24.0 %·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR005-24 18 30 12 3.34 89 2 0.1 411 4935”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR005-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR005-24Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR005-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 18 m
- To
- 30 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR005-24:18-30
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 411
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR005-24 18 30 12 3.34 89 2 0.1 411 4935”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR005-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Inc.Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 7.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 23 m
- To
- 28 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Inc.:23-28
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 828
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.22 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 36.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.22 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 23 28 5 7.22 152 3.7 0.1 828 4141”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · Inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Inc.Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 152Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 152
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 23 m
- To
- 28 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Inc.:23-28
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 828
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 152 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 760.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 23 28 5 7.22 152 3.7 0.1 828 4141”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · Inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Inc.Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 23 m
- To
- 28 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Inc.:23-28
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 828
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.7 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 18.5 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 23 28 5 7.22 152 3.7 0.1 828 4141”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · Inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Inc.Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 23 m
- To
- 28 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Inc.:23-28
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 828
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 23 28 5 7.22 152 3.7 0.1 828 4141”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · Inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR006-24Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR006-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 18 m
- To
- 23 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR006-24:18-23
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 121
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.48 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.48 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR006-24 18 23 5 0.48 68 0.4 0.1 121 603”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR006-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR006-24Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR006-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 68
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 18 m
- To
- 23 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR006-24:18-23
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 121
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 68 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 340.0 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR006-24 18 23 5 0.48 68 0.4 0.1 121 603”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR006-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR006-24Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR006-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 18 m
- To
- 23 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR006-24:18-23
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 121
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR006-24 18 23 5 0.48 68 0.4 0.1 121 603”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR006-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR006-24Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR006-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 18 m
- To
- 23 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR006-24:18-23
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 121
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR006-24 18 23 5 0.48 68 0.4 0.1 121 603”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR006-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR006-24Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR006-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16 m
- From
- 34 m
- To
- 50 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR006-24:34-50
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 64
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.16 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.16 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“and 34 50 16 0.16 34 0.5 0.1 64 1016”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR006-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR006-24Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR006-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16 m
- From
- 34 m
- To
- 50 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR006-24:34-50
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 64
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 34 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 544.0 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“and 34 50 16 0.16 34 0.5 0.1 64 1016”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR006-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR006-24Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR006-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 16 m
- From
- 34 m
- To
- 50 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR006-24:34-50
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 64
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 8.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.5 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“and 34 50 16 0.16 34 0.5 0.1 64 1016”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR006-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR006-24Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR006-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 16 m
- From
- 34 m
- To
- 50 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR006-24:34-50
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 64
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“and 34 50 16 0.16 34 0.5 0.1 64 1016”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR006-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR007-24Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR007-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.71
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 26 m
- From
- 31 m
- To
- 57 m
- Intercept Depth
- 31 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR007-24:31-57
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 126
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.71 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 18.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR007-24 31 57 26 0.71 64 0.2 0 126 3274”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR007-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR007-24Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR007-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 26 m
- From
- 31 m
- To
- 57 m
- Intercept Depth
- 31 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR007-24:31-57
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 126
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 64 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1664.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR007-24 31 57 26 0.71 64 0.2 0 126 3274”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR007-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR007-24Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 26 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR007-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 26 m
- From
- 31 m
- To
- 57 m
- Intercept Depth
- 31 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR007-24:31-57
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 126
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 5.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR007-24 31 57 26 0.71 64 0.2 0 126 3274”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR007-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR007-24Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 26 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR007-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 26 m
- From
- 31 m
- To
- 57 m
- Intercept Depth
- 31 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR007-24:31-57
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 126
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR007-24 31 57 26 0.71 64 0.2 0 126 3274”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR007-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR008-24Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR008-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 45 m
- To
- 52 m
- Intercept Depth
- 45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR008-24:45-52
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 57
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR008-24 45 52 7 0.2 14 0.6 0.3 57 400”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR008-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR008-24Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR008-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 45 m
- To
- 52 m
- Intercept Depth
- 45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR008-24:45-52
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 57
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 98.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 14 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR008-24 45 52 7 0.2 14 0.6 0.3 57 400”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR008-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR008-24Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR008-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 45 m
- To
- 52 m
- Intercept Depth
- 45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR008-24:45-52
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 57
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 4.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.6 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR008-24 45 52 7 0.2 14 0.6 0.3 57 400”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR008-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR008-24Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR008-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 45 m
- To
- 52 m
- Intercept Depth
- 45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR008-24:45-52
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 57
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR008-24 45 52 7 0.2 14 0.6 0.3 57 400”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR008-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR009-24Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 1.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR009-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 35 m
- From
- 4 m
- To
- 39 m
- Intercept Depth
- 4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR009-24:4-39
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 209
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.35 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 47.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR009-24 4 39 35 1.35 84 0.5 0.1 209 7305”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR009-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR009-24Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR009-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 84
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 35 m
- From
- 4 m
- To
- 39 m
- Intercept Depth
- 4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR009-24:4-39
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 209
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 84 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2940.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR009-24 4 39 35 1.35 84 0.5 0.1 209 7305”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR009-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR009-24Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR009-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 35 m
- From
- 4 m
- To
- 39 m
- Intercept Depth
- 4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR009-24:4-39
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 209
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 17.5 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR009-24 4 39 35 1.35 84 0.5 0.1 209 7305”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR009-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PR009-24Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PR009-24
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 35 m
- From
- 4 m
- To
- 39 m
- Intercept Depth
- 4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PR009-24:4-39
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 209
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“PR009-24 4 39 35 1.35 84 0.5 0.1 209 7305”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · PR009-24 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Inc.Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 14.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.99
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 7 m
- To
- 9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Inc.:7-9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1500
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.99 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 30.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 14.99 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 7 9 2 14.99 284 0.2 0.3 1500 3000”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · Inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Inc.Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 284Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 284
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 7 m
- To
- 9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Inc.:7-9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1500
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 284 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 568.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 284 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 7 9 2 14.99 284 0.2 0.3 1500 3000”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · Inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Inc.Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 7 m
- To
- 9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Inc.:7-9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1500
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 7 9 2 14.99 284 0.2 0.3 1500 3000”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · Inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Inc.Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Inc.
- Project
- Cerro Leon
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- argentina
- Reported Region
- argentina
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 7 m
- To
- 9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Inc.:7-9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM19s
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Alex Stewart
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1500
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“Inc. 7 9 2 14.99 284 0.2 0.3 1500 3000”
Context: Table 2: Significant drill hole assay results · Inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut Off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.