CERRO LEON: HIGHEST SILVER INTERCEPT TO DATE

Original announcement by research on

Company
Unico Silver Limited
Ticker
USL
Exchange
ASX
Region
Santa Cruz, Argentina
Primary commodity
Silver
Secondary commodities
Gold, Lead, Zinc
Document categories
Drill results, Resource update, Other
Extracted
2026-11-04 10:34:06 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Unico Silver reported Phase 3 drilling results from Cerro Leon, highlighting the highest silver intercept to date at Marta Norte and multiple strong silver-equivalent intercepts across the project. The program combined infill and extension drilling, and the company says the results support a Q3 2025 MRE update. The release also includes collar locations, QA/QC details, and the AgEq calculation assumptions.

Reasoning: The release is primarily a drilling-results announcement with numerous significant silver-equivalent intercepts and explicit resource-oriented context. It is materially positive because it includes standout intercepts and supports the planned MRE update, though the reported widths are downhole and some contextual risk remains around equivalent-grade assumptions.

Positive factors

  • Reported the highest silver intercept to date at Cerro Leon
  • Multiple strong AgEq intercepts from both oxide and sulphide zones
  • Program supports a Q3 2025 MRE update and confirms infill/extension drilling success
  • QA/QC, assay laboratory, compositing cut-off and internal dilution were disclosed

Negative factors

  • Several key intercepts are reported as apparent downhole widths rather than true widths
  • AgEq depends on disclosed metal-equivalent assumptions and historical metallurgical work
  • Some holes were still pending at the time of the appendix

Rubric flags

  • drill_results vs resource_update dominance — Primary category is drill_results because the current event is Phase 3 drilling with many new intercepts, while the resource table is supporting background.

Facts used in scoring: 214

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release states blanks, duplicates and standards, and names Alex Stewart Laboratories.

Evidence · text

“Blanks: 1 in 50 • Duplicates: 1 in 20 • Standards: 1 in 25”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: The report states the drill intercepts are calculated using greater than 40gpt AgEq with no more than 3m of internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“Mineralised drill hole intercepts are calculated using greater than 40gpt AgEq with no more than 3m of internal dilution.”

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: The JORC table says qualification of true widths are provided in the drill hole discussion, although individual table intercepts are still downhole widths.

Evidence · text

“Qualification of true widths are provided in the drill hole discussion.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The main intercepts are reported as downhole intervals and the table defines AgEq GT as grade multiplied by downhole mineralised interval.

Evidence · text

“AgEq GT = Silver equivalent grade multiplied by downhole mineralised interval (Grade Thickness)”

Stale Data Re Releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: The resource section repeats the Cerro Leon MRE from a prior ASX release dated 18 May 2023 and says no material assumptions or technical parameters have changed.

Evidence · text

“extracted from the ASX release by Unico Silver entitled “Cerro Leon Resource Grows 84% to 92Moz” dated 18 May 2023”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The summary says Phase 3 drilling comprised infill drilling within shallow oxide mineralisation to improve confidence for the Q3 MRE.

Evidence · text

“Phase 3 drilling comprised infill drilling within shallow oxide mineralisation to improve confidence for the Q3 MRE”

Step Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The release says the program included extension drilling to expand the limits of both oxide and sulphide mineralisation at depth and along strike.

Evidence · text

“further extension drilling at all prospects to expand the limits of both oxide and sulphide mineralisation at depth and along strike.”

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: The project is described as being strategically located within the same structural corridor as AngloGold Ashanti’s Cerro Vanguardia mine.

Evidence · text

“within the same structural corridor that is host to AngloGold Ashanti’s world-class Cerro Vanguardia mine”

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: AgEq is disclosed, but the equivalent calculations rely on stated prices and recoveries rather than a full current economic model; users must still interpret the equivalent cautiously.

Evidence · text

“AgEq = Ag (g/t) + 79.18 x Au (g/t) + 25.56 x Pb (%) + 39.41 x Zn (%)”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 214. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (208)

PR036-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR036-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16 m
From
35 m
To
51 m
Hole Depth
60 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR036-25:35-51
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Marta NW
Easting
527674
Northing
4681639
CRS
UTM19s
Elevation
401 m
Azimuth
150 °
Dip
50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
74
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
40
Cutoff Unit
gpt AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: This is a modest but useful interval that helps define the Marta NW mineralised system.

Positive factors

  • Broad interval and AgEq above cut-off

Negative factors

  • Low direct silver grade

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

PR014-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 90Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR014-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
90
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
102 m
To
106 m
Hole Depth
130 m
Intercept Depth
102 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR014-25:102-106
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Marta NW
Easting
525235
Northing
4683107
CRS
UTM19s
Elevation
417 m
Azimuth
42 °
Dip
55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
102
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
40
Cutoff Unit
gpt AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-05-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A modest historical intercept that supports the wider resource picture but adds little fresh novelty.

Positive factors

  • Historical result confirms mineralisation at Marta NW
  • AgEq above the reporting cut-off

Negative factors

  • Historical and narrow interval
  • Not among the stronger results

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re Releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

PR015-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR015-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
39 m
From
16 m
To
55 m
Hole Depth
63 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR015-25:16-55
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Karina
Easting
526860
Northing
4682850
CRS
UTM19s
Elevation
404 m
Azimuth
50 °
Dip
50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
255
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
40
Cutoff Unit
gpt AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Gold contributes meaningfully over 39 m, but the interval remains silver-led.

Positive factors

  • Gold is present over a broad interval
  • Adds polymetallic value to the oxide package

Negative factors

  • Silver is the primary driver of value

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

P073-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P073-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.5 m
From
115 m
To
122.5 m
Hole Depth
145 m
Intercept Depth
115 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P073-25:115-122.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Savary
Easting
527617
Northing
4681863
CRS
UTM19s
Elevation
405 m
Azimuth
40 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
lead, zinc

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
176
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
40
Cutoff Unit
gpt AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Lead is a secondary component and also a deleterious element in the equivalent formula, so its presence is useful but mixed from an investment perspective.

Positive factors

  • Lead is included in the silver-equivalent calculation
  • QA/QC and assumptions disclosed

Negative factors

  • Penalty/deleterious element context is present
  • Primary value is not driven by lead

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

P073-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P073-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
2.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.5 m
From
115 m
To
122.5 m
Hole Depth
145 m
Intercept Depth
115 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P073-25:115-122.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Savary
Easting
527617
Northing
4681863
CRS
UTM19s
Elevation
405 m
Azimuth
40 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
lead, zinc

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
176
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
40
Cutoff Unit
gpt AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Zinc is a minor but explicitly included component; the commercial significance is limited and mixed.

Positive factors

  • Zinc is part of the equivalent calculation

Negative factors

  • Zinc is also a deleterious component in this context
  • Primary value is silver-led

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

P073-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P073-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.5 m
From
115 m
To
122.5 m
Intercept Depth
115 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P073-25:115-122.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
176
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.29 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.29 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary P073-25 SULPHIDE 115 122.5 7.5 0.29 30 1.1 2.4 176 1319”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P073-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P073-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 30Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P073-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
30
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.5 m
From
115 m
To
122.5 m
Intercept Depth
115 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P073-25:115-122.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
176
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 30 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 225.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary P073-25 SULPHIDE 115 122.5 7.5 0.29 30 1.1 2.4 176 1319”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P073-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P074-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P074-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.95 m
From
104.75 m
To
111.7 m
Intercept Depth
104.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P074-25:104.75-111.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
263
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.13 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.13 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary P074-25 SULPHIDE 104.75 111.7 6.95 0.13 14 0.4 5.8 263 1829”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P074-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P074-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P074-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.95 m
From
104.75 m
To
111.7 m
Intercept Depth
104.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P074-25:104.75-111.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
263
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 97.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 14 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary P074-25 SULPHIDE 104.75 111.7 6.95 0.13 14 0.4 5.8 263 1829”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P074-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P074-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P074-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.95 m
From
104.75 m
To
111.7 m
Intercept Depth
104.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P074-25:104.75-111.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
263
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2.8 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.4 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary P074-25 SULPHIDE 104.75 111.7 6.95 0.13 14 0.4 5.8 263 1829”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P074-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P074-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 5.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P074-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
5.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.95 m
From
104.75 m
To
111.7 m
Intercept Depth
104.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P074-25:104.75-111.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
263
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.8 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 40.3 %·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary P074-25 SULPHIDE 104.75 111.7 6.95 0.13 14 0.4 5.8 263 1829”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P074-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P074-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P074-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
157.5 m
To
169.7 m
Intercept Depth
157.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P074-25:157.5-169.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
308
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.97 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary P074-25 SULPHIDE 157.5 169.7 12.2 0.97 50 1.5 3.6 308 3755”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P074-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P074-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 50Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P074-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
50
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
157.5 m
To
169.7 m
Intercept Depth
157.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P074-25:157.5-169.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
308
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 50 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 610.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary P074-25 SULPHIDE 157.5 169.7 12.2 0.97 50 1.5 3.6 308 3755”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P074-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P074-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P074-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12.2 m
From
157.5 m
To
169.7 m
Intercept Depth
157.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P074-25:157.5-169.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
308
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 18.3 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary P074-25 SULPHIDE 157.5 169.7 12.2 0.97 50 1.5 3.6 308 3755”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P074-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P074-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 3.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P074-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
3.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12.2 m
From
157.5 m
To
169.7 m
Intercept Depth
157.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P074-25:157.5-169.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
308
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.6 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 43.9 %·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary P074-25 SULPHIDE 157.5 169.7 12.2 0.97 50 1.5 3.6 308 3755”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P074-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P075-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P075-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.15 m
From
58.85 m
To
63 m
Intercept Depth
58.85 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P075-25:58.85-63
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
124
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.15 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.15 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P075-25 SULPHIDE 58.85 63 4.15 0.15 26 0.3 2 124 517”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P075-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P075-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P075-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.15 m
From
58.85 m
To
63 m
Intercept Depth
58.85 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P075-25:58.85-63
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
124
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 26 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 107.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 26 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P075-25 SULPHIDE 58.85 63 4.15 0.15 26 0.3 2 124 517”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P075-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P075-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P075-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.15 m
From
58.85 m
To
63 m
Intercept Depth
58.85 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P075-25:58.85-63
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
124
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.3 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P075-25 SULPHIDE 58.85 63 4.15 0.15 26 0.3 2 124 517”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P075-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P075-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P075-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.15 m
From
58.85 m
To
63 m
Intercept Depth
58.85 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P075-25:58.85-63
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
124
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 8.3 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P075-25 SULPHIDE 58.85 63 4.15 0.15 26 0.3 2 124 517”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P075-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P075-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P075-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.3 m
From
81 m
To
86.3 m
Intercept Depth
81 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P075-25:81-86.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
184
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.34 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.34 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P075-25 SULPHIDE 81 86.3 5.3 0.34 56 0.4 2.3 184 976”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P075-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P075-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P075-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.3 m
From
81 m
To
86.3 m
Intercept Depth
81 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P075-25:81-86.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
184
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 56 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 296.8 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P075-25 SULPHIDE 81 86.3 5.3 0.34 56 0.4 2.3 184 976”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P075-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P075-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P075-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.3 m
From
81 m
To
86.3 m
Intercept Depth
81 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P075-25:81-86.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
184
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.4 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P075-25 SULPHIDE 81 86.3 5.3 0.34 56 0.4 2.3 184 976”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P075-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P075-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P075-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.3 m
From
81 m
To
86.3 m
Intercept Depth
81 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P075-25:81-86.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
184
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.3 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 12.2 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P075-25 SULPHIDE 81 86.3 5.3 0.34 56 0.4 2.3 184 976”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P075-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P076-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P076-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.74
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.9 m
From
98 m
To
101.9 m
Intercept Depth
98 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P076-25:98-101.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
394
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.74 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.74 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P076-25 SULPHIDE 98 101.9 3.9 0.74 260 0.6 1.5 394 1535”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P076-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P076-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 260Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P076-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
260
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.9 m
From
98 m
To
101.9 m
Intercept Depth
98 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P076-25:98-101.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
394
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 260 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1014.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 260 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P076-25 SULPHIDE 98 101.9 3.9 0.74 260 0.6 1.5 394 1535”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P076-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P076-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P076-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.9 m
From
98 m
To
101.9 m
Intercept Depth
98 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P076-25:98-101.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
394
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.6 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P076-25 SULPHIDE 98 101.9 3.9 0.74 260 0.6 1.5 394 1535”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P076-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P076-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P076-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.9 m
From
98 m
To
101.9 m
Intercept Depth
98 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P076-25:98-101.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
394
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 5.8 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.5 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P076-25 SULPHIDE 98 101.9 3.9 0.74 260 0.6 1.5 394 1535”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P076-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P077-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P077-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.7 m
From
26.8 m
To
36.5 m
Intercept Depth
26.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P077-25:26.8-36.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
112
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.11 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P077-25 MIXED 26.8 36.5 9.7 0.11 40 0.3 1.4 112 1083”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P077-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P077-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 40Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P077-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
40
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.7 m
From
26.8 m
To
36.5 m
Intercept Depth
26.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P077-25:26.8-36.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
112
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 40 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 388.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P077-25 MIXED 26.8 36.5 9.7 0.11 40 0.3 1.4 112 1083”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P077-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P077-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P077-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.7 m
From
26.8 m
To
36.5 m
Intercept Depth
26.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P077-25:26.8-36.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
112
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2.9 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.3 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P077-25 MIXED 26.8 36.5 9.7 0.11 40 0.3 1.4 112 1083”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P077-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P077-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P077-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.7 m
From
26.8 m
To
36.5 m
Intercept Depth
26.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P077-25:26.8-36.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
112
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 13.6 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.4 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P077-25 MIXED 26.8 36.5 9.7 0.11 40 0.3 1.4 112 1083”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P077-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P077-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P077-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
48 m
To
55.6 m
Intercept Depth
48 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P077-25:48-55.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
168
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.39 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.39 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P077-25 MIXED 48 55.6 7.6 0.39 51 0.6 1.8 168 1280”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P077-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P077-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P077-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
48 m
To
55.6 m
Intercept Depth
48 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P077-25:48-55.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
168
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 51 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 387.6 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P077-25 MIXED 48 55.6 7.6 0.39 51 0.6 1.8 168 1280”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P077-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P077-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P077-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.6 m
From
48 m
To
55.6 m
Intercept Depth
48 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P077-25:48-55.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
168
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 4.6 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.6 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P077-25 MIXED 48 55.6 7.6 0.39 51 0.6 1.8 168 1280”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P077-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P077-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P077-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.6 m
From
48 m
To
55.6 m
Intercept Depth
48 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P077-25:48-55.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
168
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.8 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 13.7 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.8 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P077-25 MIXED 48 55.6 7.6 0.39 51 0.6 1.8 168 1280”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P077-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P079-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P079-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20.55 m
From
95.95 m
To
116.5 m
Intercept Depth
95.95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P079-25:95.95-116.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
171
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.09 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Kasia P079-25 SULPHIDE 95.95 116.5 20.55 0.09 8 0.4 3.7 171 3519”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P079-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P079-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P079-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20.55 m
From
95.95 m
To
116.5 m
Intercept Depth
95.95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P079-25:95.95-116.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
171
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 164.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Kasia P079-25 SULPHIDE 95.95 116.5 20.55 0.09 8 0.4 3.7 171 3519”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P079-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P079-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 20.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P079-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
20.55 m
From
95.95 m
To
116.5 m
Intercept Depth
95.95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P079-25:95.95-116.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
171
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 8.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.4 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Kasia P079-25 SULPHIDE 95.95 116.5 20.55 0.09 8 0.4 3.7 171 3519”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P079-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P079-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 20.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P079-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
3.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
20.55 m
From
95.95 m
To
116.5 m
Intercept Depth
95.95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P079-25:95.95-116.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
171
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.7 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 76.0 %·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Kasia P079-25 SULPHIDE 95.95 116.5 20.55 0.09 8 0.4 3.7 171 3519”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P079-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P080-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P080-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
95 m
To
101 m
Intercept Depth
95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P080-25:95-101
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
280
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.56 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.56 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina P080-25 SULPHIDE 95 101 6 0.56 44 1.3 4 280 1678”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P080-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P080-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P080-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
95 m
To
101 m
Intercept Depth
95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P080-25:95-101
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
280
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 44 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 264.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina P080-25 SULPHIDE 95 101 6 0.56 44 1.3 4 280 1678”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P080-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P080-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P080-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6 m
From
95 m
To
101 m
Intercept Depth
95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P080-25:95-101
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
280
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 7.8 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina P080-25 SULPHIDE 95 101 6 0.56 44 1.3 4 280 1678”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P080-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P080-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P080-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6 m
From
95 m
To
101 m
Intercept Depth
95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P080-25:95-101
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
280
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 24.0 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina P080-25 SULPHIDE 95 101 6 0.56 44 1.3 4 280 1678”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P080-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P080-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P080-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.8 m
From
140.5 m
To
151.3 m
Intercept Depth
140.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P080-25:140.5-151.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
110
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.19 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.19 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina P080-25 SULPHIDE 140.5 151.3 10.8 0.19 19 0.5 1.6 110 1188”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P080-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P080-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P080-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.8 m
From
140.5 m
To
151.3 m
Intercept Depth
140.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P080-25:140.5-151.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
110
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 205.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina P080-25 SULPHIDE 140.5 151.3 10.8 0.19 19 0.5 1.6 110 1188”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P080-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P080-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P080-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.8 m
From
140.5 m
To
151.3 m
Intercept Depth
140.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P080-25:140.5-151.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
110
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 5.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.5 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina P080-25 SULPHIDE 140.5 151.3 10.8 0.19 19 0.5 1.6 110 1188”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P080-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P080-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P080-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.8 m
From
140.5 m
To
151.3 m
Intercept Depth
140.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P080-25:140.5-151.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
110
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.6 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 17.3 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina P080-25 SULPHIDE 140.5 151.3 10.8 0.19 19 0.5 1.6 110 1188”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P080-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P081-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P081-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.84
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
17 m
To
22 m
Intercept Depth
17 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P081-25:17-22
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
203
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.84 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.84 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina P081-25 OXIDE 17 22 5 0.84 87 1.9 0 203 1014”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P081-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P081-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P081-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
87
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
17 m
To
22 m
Intercept Depth
17 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P081-25:17-22
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
203
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 87 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 435.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina P081-25 OXIDE 17 22 5 0.84 87 1.9 0 203 1014”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P081-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P081-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P081-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5 m
From
17 m
To
22 m
Intercept Depth
17 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P081-25:17-22
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
203
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.9 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 9.5 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina P081-25 OXIDE 17 22 5 0.84 87 1.9 0 203 1014”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P081-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P081-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P081-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5 m
From
17 m
To
22 m
Intercept Depth
17 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P081-25:17-22
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
203
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina P081-25 OXIDE 17 22 5 0.84 87 1.9 0 203 1014”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P081-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P081-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P081-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
102 m
To
106 m
Intercept Depth
102 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P081-25:102-106
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
461
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.55 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.55 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina P081-25 SULPHIDE 102 106 4 0.55 417 0 0 461 1844”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P081-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P081-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 417Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P081-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
417
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
102 m
To
106 m
Intercept Depth
102 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P081-25:102-106
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
461
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 417 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1668.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 417 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina P081-25 SULPHIDE 102 106 4 0.55 417 0 0 461 1844”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P081-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P081-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P081-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
102 m
To
106 m
Intercept Depth
102 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P081-25:102-106
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
461
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina P081-25 SULPHIDE 102 106 4 0.55 417 0 0 461 1844”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P081-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P081-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P081-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
102 m
To
106 m
Intercept Depth
102 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P081-25:102-106
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
461
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina P081-25 SULPHIDE 102 106 4 0.55 417 0 0 461 1844”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P081-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P082-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P082-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.55 m
From
124.45 m
To
133 m
Intercept Depth
124.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P082-25:124.45-133
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
117
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.21 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.21 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina P082-25 SULPHIDE 124.45 133 8.55 0.21 25 0.8 1.4 117 1004”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P082-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P082-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P082-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.55 m
From
124.45 m
To
133 m
Intercept Depth
124.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P082-25:124.45-133
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
117
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 25 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 213.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina P082-25 SULPHIDE 124.45 133 8.55 0.21 25 0.8 1.4 117 1004”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P082-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P082-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P082-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8.55 m
From
124.45 m
To
133 m
Intercept Depth
124.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P082-25:124.45-133
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
117
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 6.8 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.8 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina P082-25 SULPHIDE 124.45 133 8.55 0.21 25 0.8 1.4 117 1004”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P082-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P082-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P082-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8.55 m
From
124.45 m
To
133 m
Intercept Depth
124.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P082-25:124.45-133
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
117
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 12.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.4 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina P082-25 SULPHIDE 124.45 133 8.55 0.21 25 0.8 1.4 117 1004”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P082-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P083-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 58.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P083-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
58.55 m
From
47 m
To
105.55 m
Intercept Depth
47 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P083-25:47-105.55
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
70
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.06 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Kasia P083-25 SULPHIDE 47 105.55 58.55 0.06 8 0.4 1.2 70 4117”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P083-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P083-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 58.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P083-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
58.55 m
From
47 m
To
105.55 m
Intercept Depth
47 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P083-25:47-105.55
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
70
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 468.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Kasia P083-25 SULPHIDE 47 105.55 58.55 0.06 8 0.4 1.2 70 4117”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P083-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P083-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 58.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P083-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
58.55 m
From
47 m
To
105.55 m
Intercept Depth
47 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P083-25:47-105.55
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
70
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 23.4 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Kasia P083-25 SULPHIDE 47 105.55 58.55 0.06 8 0.4 1.2 70 4117”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P083-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P083-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 58.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P083-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
58.55 m
From
47 m
To
105.55 m
Intercept Depth
47 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P083-25:47-105.55
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
70
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.2 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 70.3 %·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Kasia P083-25 SULPHIDE 47 105.55 58.55 0.06 8 0.4 1.2 70 4117”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · P083-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR001-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR001-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12 m
From
55 m
To
67 m
Intercept Depth
55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR001-25:55-67
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
449
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.37 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.37 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Tranquilo PR001-25 SULPHIDE 55 67 12 0.37 364 1.1 0.7 449 5392”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR001-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR001-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 364Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR001-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
364
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12 m
From
55 m
To
67 m
Intercept Depth
55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR001-25:55-67
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
449
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 364 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4368.0 g/t·m is strong.

Positive factors

  • 364 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Tranquilo PR001-25 SULPHIDE 55 67 12 0.37 364 1.1 0.7 449 5392”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR001-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR001-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR001-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12 m
From
55 m
To
67 m
Intercept Depth
55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR001-25:55-67
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
449
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 13.2 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Tranquilo PR001-25 SULPHIDE 55 67 12 0.37 364 1.1 0.7 449 5392”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR001-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR001-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR001-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12 m
From
55 m
To
67 m
Intercept Depth
55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR001-25:55-67
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
449
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 8.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.7 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Tranquilo PR001-25 SULPHIDE 55 67 12 0.37 364 1.1 0.7 449 5392”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR001-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR002-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR002-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
60 m
To
66 m
Intercept Depth
60 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR002-25:60-66
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
205
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.17 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.17 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Tranquilo PR002-25 OXIDE 60 66 6 0.17 167 0.2 0.5 205 1233”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR002-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR002-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 167Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR002-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
167
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
60 m
To
66 m
Intercept Depth
60 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR002-25:60-66
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
205
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 167 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1002.0 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Tranquilo PR002-25 OXIDE 60 66 6 0.17 167 0.2 0.5 205 1233”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR002-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR002-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR002-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6 m
From
60 m
To
66 m
Intercept Depth
60 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR002-25:60-66
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
205
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.2 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Tranquilo PR002-25 OXIDE 60 66 6 0.17 167 0.2 0.5 205 1233”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR002-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR002-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR002-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6 m
From
60 m
To
66 m
Intercept Depth
60 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR002-25:60-66
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
205
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.5 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Tranquilo PR002-25 OXIDE 60 66 6 0.17 167 0.2 0.5 205 1233”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR002-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR003-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR003-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20 m
From
9 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR003-25:9-29
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
139
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.57 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR003-25 OXIDE 9 29 20 0.57 59 1.2 0.1 139 2784”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR003-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR003-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR003-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
59
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20 m
From
9 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR003-25:9-29
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
139
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 59 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1180.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR003-25 OXIDE 9 29 20 0.57 59 1.2 0.1 139 2784”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR003-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR003-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 20 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR003-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
20 m
From
9 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR003-25:9-29
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
139
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.2 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 24.0 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR003-25 OXIDE 9 29 20 0.57 59 1.2 0.1 139 2784”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR003-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR003-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 20 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR003-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
20 m
From
9 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR003-25:9-29
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
139
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR003-25 OXIDE 9 29 20 0.57 59 1.2 0.1 139 2784”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR003-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR003-26Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 2.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR003-26
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
2.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
57 m
To
64 m
Intercept Depth
57 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR003-26:57-64
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
237
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.35 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 16.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR003-26 MIXED 57 64 7 2.35 26 0.6 0.2 237 1661”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR003-26 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR003-26Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR003-26
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
57 m
To
64 m
Intercept Depth
57 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR003-26:57-64
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
237
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 26 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 182.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 26 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR003-26 MIXED 57 64 7 2.35 26 0.6 0.2 237 1661”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR003-26 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR003-26Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR003-26
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
57 m
To
64 m
Intercept Depth
57 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR003-26:57-64
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
237
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 4.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.6 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR003-26 MIXED 57 64 7 2.35 26 0.6 0.2 237 1661”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR003-26 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR003-26Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR003-26
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
57 m
To
64 m
Intercept Depth
57 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR003-26:57-64
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
237
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.2 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR003-26 MIXED 57 64 7 2.35 26 0.6 0.2 237 1661”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR003-26 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR004-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR004-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
49 m
To
56 m
Intercept Depth
49 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR004-25:49-56
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
154
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR004-25 SULPHIDE 49 56 7 0.3 40 1.5 1.3 154 1075”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR004-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR004-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 40Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR004-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
40
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
49 m
To
56 m
Intercept Depth
49 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR004-25:49-56
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
154
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 40 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 280.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR004-25 SULPHIDE 49 56 7 0.3 40 1.5 1.3 154 1075”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR004-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR004-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR004-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
49 m
To
56 m
Intercept Depth
49 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR004-25:49-56
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
154
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 10.5 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR004-25 SULPHIDE 49 56 7 0.3 40 1.5 1.3 154 1075”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR004-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR004-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR004-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
49 m
To
56 m
Intercept Depth
49 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR004-25:49-56
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
154
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 9.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.3 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR004-25 SULPHIDE 49 56 7 0.3 40 1.5 1.3 154 1075”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR004-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR004-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR004-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
26 m
From
81 m
To
107 m
Intercept Depth
81 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR004-25:81-107
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
321
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.27 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.27 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR004-25 SULPHIDE 81 107 26 0.27 255 0.5 0.8 321 8344”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR004-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR004-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 255Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR004-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
255
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
26 m
From
81 m
To
107 m
Intercept Depth
81 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR004-25:81-107
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
321
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 255 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6630.0 g/t·m is strong.

Positive factors

  • 255 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR004-25 SULPHIDE 81 107 26 0.27 255 0.5 0.8 321 8344”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR004-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR004-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 26 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR004-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
26 m
From
81 m
To
107 m
Intercept Depth
81 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR004-25:81-107
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
321
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 13.0 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR004-25 SULPHIDE 81 107 26 0.27 255 0.5 0.8 321 8344”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR004-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR004-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 26 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR004-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
26 m
From
81 m
To
107 m
Intercept Depth
81 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR004-25:81-107
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
321
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 20.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR004-25 SULPHIDE 81 107 26 0.27 255 0.5 0.8 321 8344”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR004-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR004-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 1.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR004-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
91 m
To
94 m
Intercept Depth
91 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR004-25:91-94
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2002
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.03 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.03 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR004-25 SULPHIDE 91 94 3 1.03 1839 1 1.4 2002 6006”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR004-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR004-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 1839Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR004-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1839
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
91 m
To
94 m
Intercept Depth
91 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR004-25:91-94
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2002
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1839 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5517.0 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1839 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR004-25 SULPHIDE 91 94 3 1.03 1839 1 1.4 2002 6006”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR004-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR004-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR004-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
91 m
To
94 m
Intercept Depth
91 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR004-25:91-94
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2002
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR004-25 SULPHIDE 91 94 3 1.03 1839 1 1.4 2002 6006”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR004-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR004-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR004-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
91 m
To
94 m
Intercept Depth
91 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR004-25:91-94
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2002
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 4.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.4 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR004-25 SULPHIDE 91 94 3 1.03 1839 1 1.4 2002 6006”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR004-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR005-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR005-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
77 m
To
84 m
Intercept Depth
77 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR005-25:77-84
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
59
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.05 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta N PR005-25 OXIDE 77 84 7 0.05 55 0 0 59 413”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR005-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR005-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR005-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
77 m
To
84 m
Intercept Depth
77 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR005-25:77-84
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
59
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 55 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 385.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta N PR005-25 OXIDE 77 84 7 0.05 55 0 0 59 413”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR005-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR005-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR005-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
77 m
To
84 m
Intercept Depth
77 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR005-25:77-84
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
59
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta N PR005-25 OXIDE 77 84 7 0.05 55 0 0 59 413”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR005-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR005-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR005-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
77 m
To
84 m
Intercept Depth
77 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR005-25:77-84
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
59
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta N PR005-25 OXIDE 77 84 7 0.05 55 0 0 59 413”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR005-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR006-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR006-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15 m
From
35 m
To
50 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR006-25:35-50
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
73
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta N PR006-25 OXIDE 35 50 15 0.1 65 0 0 73 1095”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR006-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR006-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR006-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15 m
From
35 m
To
50 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR006-25:35-50
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
73
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 65 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 975.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta N PR006-25 OXIDE 35 50 15 0.1 65 0 0 73 1095”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR006-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR006-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR006-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
15 m
From
35 m
To
50 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR006-25:35-50
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
73
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta N PR006-25 OXIDE 35 50 15 0.1 65 0 0 73 1095”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR006-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR006-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR006-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
15 m
From
35 m
To
50 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR006-25:35-50
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
73
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta N PR006-25 OXIDE 35 50 15 0.1 65 0 0 73 1095”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR006-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR007-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR007-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13 m
From
39 m
To
52 m
Intercept Depth
39 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR007-25:39-52
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
140
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.14 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.14 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta N PR007-25 OXIDE 39 52 13 0.14 121 0.3 0 140 1818”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR007-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR007-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 121Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR007-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
121
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13 m
From
39 m
To
52 m
Intercept Depth
39 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR007-25:39-52
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
140
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 121 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1573.0 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta N PR007-25 OXIDE 39 52 13 0.14 121 0.3 0 140 1818”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR007-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR007-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR007-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13 m
From
39 m
To
52 m
Intercept Depth
39 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR007-25:39-52
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
140
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.9 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.3 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta N PR007-25 OXIDE 39 52 13 0.14 121 0.3 0 140 1818”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR007-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR007-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR007-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13 m
From
39 m
To
52 m
Intercept Depth
39 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR007-25:39-52
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
140
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta N PR007-25 OXIDE 39 52 13 0.14 121 0.3 0 140 1818”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR007-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR008-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR008-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
36 m
From
1 m
To
37 m
Intercept Depth
1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR008-25:1-37
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
474
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.41 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta N PR008-25 OXIDE 1 37 36 0.41 436 0.2 0 474 17061”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR008-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR008-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 436Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR008-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
436
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
36 m
From
1 m
To
37 m
Intercept Depth
1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR008-25:1-37
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
474
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 436 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 15696.0 g/t·m is exceptional (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 436 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta N PR008-25 OXIDE 1 37 36 0.41 436 0.2 0 474 17061”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR008-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR008-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 36 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR008-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
36 m
From
1 m
To
37 m
Intercept Depth
1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR008-25:1-37
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
474
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 7.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.2 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta N PR008-25 OXIDE 1 37 36 0.41 436 0.2 0 474 17061”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR008-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR008-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 36 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR008-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
36 m
From
1 m
To
37 m
Intercept Depth
1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR008-25:1-37
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
474
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta N PR008-25 OXIDE 1 37 36 0.41 436 0.2 0 474 17061”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR008-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR008-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR008-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13 m
From
16 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR008-25:16-29
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1096
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta N PR008-25 OXIDE 16 29 13 0.8 1024 0.3 0 1096 14244”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR008-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR008-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 1024Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR008-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1024
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13 m
From
16 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR008-25:16-29
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1096
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1024 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 13312.0 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 1024 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta N PR008-25 OXIDE 16 29 13 0.8 1024 0.3 0 1096 14244”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR008-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR008-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR008-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13 m
From
16 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR008-25:16-29
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1096
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.9 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.3 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta N PR008-25 OXIDE 16 29 13 0.8 1024 0.3 0 1096 14244”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR008-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR008-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR008-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13 m
From
16 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR008-25:16-29
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1096
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta N PR008-25 OXIDE 16 29 13 0.8 1024 0.3 0 1096 14244”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR008-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR011-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR011-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
87 m
To
95 m
Intercept Depth
87 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR011-25:87-95
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
161
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.25 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta NW PR011-25 OXIDE 87 95 8 0.25 138 0.1 0 161 1284”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR011-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR011-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 138Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR011-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
138
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
87 m
To
95 m
Intercept Depth
87 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR011-25:87-95
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
161
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 138 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1104.0 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta NW PR011-25 OXIDE 87 95 8 0.25 138 0.1 0 161 1284”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR011-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR011-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR011-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8 m
From
87 m
To
95 m
Intercept Depth
87 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR011-25:87-95
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
161
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta NW PR011-25 OXIDE 87 95 8 0.25 138 0.1 0 161 1284”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR011-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR011-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR011-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8 m
From
87 m
To
95 m
Intercept Depth
87 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR011-25:87-95
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
161
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta NW PR011-25 OXIDE 87 95 8 0.25 138 0.1 0 161 1284”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR011-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR014-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR014-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
102 m
To
106 m
Intercept Depth
102 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR014-25:102-106
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
102
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.15 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.15 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta NW PR014-25 OXIDE 102 106 4 0.15 90 0 0 102 408”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR014-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR014-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR014-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
102 m
To
106 m
Intercept Depth
102 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR014-25:102-106
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
102
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta NW PR014-25 OXIDE 102 106 4 0.15 90 0 0 102 408”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR014-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR014-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR014-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
102 m
To
106 m
Intercept Depth
102 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR014-25:102-106
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
102
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta NW PR014-25 OXIDE 102 106 4 0.15 90 0 0 102 408”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR014-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR015-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 208Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR015-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
208
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
39 m
From
16 m
To
55 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR015-25:16-55
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
255
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 208 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8112.0 g/t·m is exceptional (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 208 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR015-25 OXIDE 16 55 39 0.55 208 0.1 0 255 9928”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR015-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR015-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 39 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR015-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
39 m
From
16 m
To
55 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR015-25:16-55
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
255
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.9 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR015-25 OXIDE 16 55 39 0.55 208 0.1 0 255 9928”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR015-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR015-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 39 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR015-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
39 m
From
16 m
To
55 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR015-25:16-55
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
255
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR015-25 OXIDE 16 55 39 0.55 208 0.1 0 255 9928”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR015-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR015-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR015-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.93
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
38 m
To
45 m
Intercept Depth
38 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR015-25:38-45
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1011
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.93 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.93 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR015-25 OXIDE 38 45 7 0.93 903 1.3 0 1011 7074”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR015-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR015-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 903Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR015-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
903
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
38 m
To
45 m
Intercept Depth
38 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR015-25:38-45
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1011
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 903 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6321.0 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 903 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR015-25 OXIDE 38 45 7 0.93 903 1.3 0 1011 7074”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR015-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR015-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR015-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
38 m
To
45 m
Intercept Depth
38 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR015-25:38-45
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1011
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 9.1 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR015-25 OXIDE 38 45 7 0.93 903 1.3 0 1011 7074”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR015-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR015-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR015-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
38 m
To
45 m
Intercept Depth
38 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR015-25:38-45
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1011
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR015-25 OXIDE 38 45 7 0.93 903 1.3 0 1011 7074”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR015-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR016-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR016-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
38 m
From
12 m
To
50 m
Intercept Depth
12 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR016-25:12-50
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
117
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.45 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR016-25 OXIDE 12 50 38 0.45 78 0.1 0 117 4429”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR016-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR016-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR016-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
38 m
From
12 m
To
50 m
Intercept Depth
12 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR016-25:12-50
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
117
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 78 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2964.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR016-25 OXIDE 12 50 38 0.45 78 0.1 0 117 4429”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR016-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR016-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR016-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
38 m
From
12 m
To
50 m
Intercept Depth
12 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR016-25:12-50
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
117
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.8 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR016-25 OXIDE 12 50 38 0.45 78 0.1 0 117 4429”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR016-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR016-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR016-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
38 m
From
12 m
To
50 m
Intercept Depth
12 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR016-25:12-50
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
117
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR016-25 OXIDE 12 50 38 0.45 78 0.1 0 117 4429”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR016-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR017-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR017-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24 m
From
0 m
To
24 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR017-25:0-24
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
74
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.24 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 5.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.24 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR017-25 OXIDE 0 24 24 0.24 36 0.6 0.1 74 1787”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR017-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR017-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR017-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24 m
From
0 m
To
24 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR017-25:0-24
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
74
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 36 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 864.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR017-25 OXIDE 0 24 24 0.24 36 0.6 0.1 74 1787”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR017-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR017-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR017-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
24 m
From
0 m
To
24 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR017-25:0-24
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
74
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 14.4 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR017-25 OXIDE 0 24 24 0.24 36 0.6 0.1 74 1787”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR017-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR017-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR017-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
24 m
From
0 m
To
24 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR017-25:0-24
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
74
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR017-25 OXIDE 0 24 24 0.24 36 0.6 0.1 74 1787”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR017-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR018-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR018-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
7 m
To
14 m
Intercept Depth
7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR018-25:7-14
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
129
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.88 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.88 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR018-25 OXIDE 7 14 7 0.88 44 0.4 0.1 129 900”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR018-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR018-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR018-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
7 m
To
14 m
Intercept Depth
7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR018-25:7-14
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
129
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 44 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 308.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR018-25 OXIDE 7 14 7 0.88 44 0.4 0.1 129 900”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR018-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR018-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR018-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
7 m
To
14 m
Intercept Depth
7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR018-25:7-14
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
129
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2.8 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.4 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR018-25 OXIDE 7 14 7 0.88 44 0.4 0.1 129 900”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR018-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR018-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR018-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
7 m
To
14 m
Intercept Depth
7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR018-25:7-14
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
129
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR018-25 OXIDE 7 14 7 0.88 44 0.4 0.1 129 900”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR018-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR018-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR018-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14 m
From
22 m
To
36 m
Intercept Depth
22 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR018-25:22-36
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
182
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.57 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.57 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR018-25 OXIDE 22 36 14 0.57 121 0.6 0 182 2547”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR018-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR018-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 121Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR018-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
121
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14 m
From
22 m
To
36 m
Intercept Depth
22 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR018-25:22-36
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
182
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 121 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1694.0 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR018-25 OXIDE 22 36 14 0.57 121 0.6 0 182 2547”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR018-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR018-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR018-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14 m
From
22 m
To
36 m
Intercept Depth
22 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR018-25:22-36
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
182
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 8.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.6 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR018-25 OXIDE 22 36 14 0.57 121 0.6 0 182 2547”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR018-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR018-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR018-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14 m
From
22 m
To
36 m
Intercept Depth
22 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR018-25:22-36
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
182
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR018-25 OXIDE 22 36 14 0.57 121 0.6 0 182 2547”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR018-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR019-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR019-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
36 m
To
41 m
Intercept Depth
36 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR019-25:36-41
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
162
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.59 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.59 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR019-25 OXIDE 36 41 5 0.59 103 0.3 0.1 162 809”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR019-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR019-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 103Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR019-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
103
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
36 m
To
41 m
Intercept Depth
36 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR019-25:36-41
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
162
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 103 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 515.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR019-25 OXIDE 36 41 5 0.59 103 0.3 0.1 162 809”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR019-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR019-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR019-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5 m
From
36 m
To
41 m
Intercept Depth
36 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR019-25:36-41
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
162
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.3 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR019-25 OXIDE 36 41 5 0.59 103 0.3 0.1 162 809”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR019-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR019-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR019-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5 m
From
36 m
To
41 m
Intercept Depth
36 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR019-25:36-41
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
162
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR019-25 OXIDE 36 41 5 0.59 103 0.3 0.1 162 809”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR019-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR020-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR020-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
26 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
26 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR020-25:26-29
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
135
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.12 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR020-25 OXIDE 26 29 3 0.12 109 0.5 0.1 135 406”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR020-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR020-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 109Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR020-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
109
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
26 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
26 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR020-25:26-29
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
135
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 109 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 327.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR020-25 OXIDE 26 29 3 0.12 109 0.5 0.1 135 406”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR020-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR020-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR020-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
26 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
26 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR020-25:26-29
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
135
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.5 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR020-25 OXIDE 26 29 3 0.12 109 0.5 0.1 135 406”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR020-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR020-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR020-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
26 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
26 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR020-25:26-29
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
135
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Karina PR020-25 OXIDE 26 29 3 0.12 109 0.5 0.1 135 406”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR020-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR021-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR021-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
22 m
To
26 m
Intercept Depth
22 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR021-25:22-26
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
401
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.59 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.59 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS PR021-25 OXIDE 22 26 4 0.59 285 2.4 0.2 401 1606”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR021-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR021-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 285Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR021-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
285
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
22 m
To
26 m
Intercept Depth
22 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR021-25:22-26
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
401
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 285 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1140.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 285 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS PR021-25 OXIDE 22 26 4 0.59 285 2.4 0.2 401 1606”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR021-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR021-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR021-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
2.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
22 m
To
26 m
Intercept Depth
22 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR021-25:22-26
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
401
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.4 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 9.6 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS PR021-25 OXIDE 22 26 4 0.59 285 2.4 0.2 401 1606”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR021-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR021-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR021-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
22 m
To
26 m
Intercept Depth
22 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR021-25:22-26
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
401
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.2 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS PR021-25 OXIDE 22 26 4 0.59 285 2.4 0.2 401 1606”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR021-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR022-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR022-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
30 m
To
36 m
Intercept Depth
30 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR022-25:30-36
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
275
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.64 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.64 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS PR022-25 OXIDE 30 36 6 0.64 193 0.9 0.2 275 1651”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR022-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR022-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 193Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR022-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
193
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
30 m
To
36 m
Intercept Depth
30 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR022-25:30-36
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
275
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 193 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1158.0 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS PR022-25 OXIDE 30 36 6 0.64 193 0.9 0.2 275 1651”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR022-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR022-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR022-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6 m
From
30 m
To
36 m
Intercept Depth
30 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR022-25:30-36
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
275
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 5.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.9 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS PR022-25 OXIDE 30 36 6 0.64 193 0.9 0.2 275 1651”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR022-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR022-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR022-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6 m
From
30 m
To
36 m
Intercept Depth
30 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR022-25:30-36
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
275
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.2 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS PR022-25 OXIDE 30 36 6 0.64 193 0.9 0.2 275 1651”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR022-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR023-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR023-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
22 m
To
26 m
Intercept Depth
22 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR023-25:22-26
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
319
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.41 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.41 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS PR023-25 OXIDE 22 26 4 0.41 205 2.7 0.3 319 1275”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR023-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR023-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 205Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR023-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
205
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
22 m
To
26 m
Intercept Depth
22 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR023-25:22-26
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
319
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 205 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 820.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 205 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS PR023-25 OXIDE 22 26 4 0.41 205 2.7 0.3 319 1275”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR023-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR023-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR023-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
2.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
22 m
To
26 m
Intercept Depth
22 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR023-25:22-26
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
319
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.7 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 10.8 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS PR023-25 OXIDE 22 26 4 0.41 205 2.7 0.3 319 1275”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR023-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR023-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR023-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
22 m
To
26 m
Intercept Depth
22 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR023-25:22-26
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
319
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.3 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS PR023-25 OXIDE 22 26 4 0.41 205 2.7 0.3 319 1275”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR023-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR024-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR024-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
11 m
To
14 m
Intercept Depth
11 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR024-25:11-14
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
319
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.31 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.31 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS PR024-25 OXIDE 11 14 3 0.31 263 0.9 0.2 319 956”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR024-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR024-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 263Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR024-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
263
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
11 m
To
14 m
Intercept Depth
11 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR024-25:11-14
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
319
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 263 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 789.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 263 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS PR024-25 OXIDE 11 14 3 0.31 263 0.9 0.2 319 956”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR024-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR024-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR024-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
11 m
To
14 m
Intercept Depth
11 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR024-25:11-14
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
319
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2.7 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.9 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS PR024-25 OXIDE 11 14 3 0.31 263 0.9 0.2 319 956”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR024-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR024-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR024-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
11 m
To
14 m
Intercept Depth
11 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR024-25:11-14
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
319
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.2 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS PR024-25 OXIDE 11 14 3 0.31 263 0.9 0.2 319 956”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR024-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR025-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR025-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14 m
From
55 m
To
69 m
Intercept Depth
55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR025-25:55-69
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
143
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.43 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.43 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary PR025-25 SULPHIDE 55 69 14 0.43 22 0.6 1.8 143 1997”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR025-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR025-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR025-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14 m
From
55 m
To
69 m
Intercept Depth
55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR025-25:55-69
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
143
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 308.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary PR025-25 SULPHIDE 55 69 14 0.43 22 0.6 1.8 143 1997”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR025-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR025-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR025-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14 m
From
55 m
To
69 m
Intercept Depth
55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR025-25:55-69
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
143
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 8.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.6 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary PR025-25 SULPHIDE 55 69 14 0.43 22 0.6 1.8 143 1997”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR025-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR025-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR025-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14 m
From
55 m
To
69 m
Intercept Depth
55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR025-25:55-69
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
143
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.8 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 25.2 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary PR025-25 SULPHIDE 55 69 14 0.43 22 0.6 1.8 143 1997”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR025-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR026-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR026-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.42
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
78 m
To
85 m
Intercept Depth
78 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR026-25:78-85
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
162
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.42 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.42 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary PR026-25 SULPHIDE 78 85 7 0.42 21 0.5 2.4 162 1134”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR026-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR026-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR026-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
78 m
To
85 m
Intercept Depth
78 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR026-25:78-85
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
162
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 147.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 21 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary PR026-25 SULPHIDE 78 85 7 0.42 21 0.5 2.4 162 1134”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR026-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR026-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR026-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
78 m
To
85 m
Intercept Depth
78 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR026-25:78-85
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
162
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.5 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary PR026-25 SULPHIDE 78 85 7 0.42 21 0.5 2.4 162 1134”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR026-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR026-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR026-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
2.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
78 m
To
85 m
Intercept Depth
78 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR026-25:78-85
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
162
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.4 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 16.8 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary PR026-25 SULPHIDE 78 85 7 0.42 21 0.5 2.4 162 1134”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR026-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR027-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR027-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14 m
From
72 m
To
86 m
Intercept Depth
72 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR027-25:72-86
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
126
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.33 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.33 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary PR027-25 SULPHIDE 72 86 14 0.33 20 0.5 1.7 126 1766”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR027-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR027-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 20Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR027-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
20
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14 m
From
72 m
To
86 m
Intercept Depth
72 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR027-25:72-86
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
126
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 280.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary PR027-25 SULPHIDE 72 86 14 0.33 20 0.5 1.7 126 1766”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR027-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR027-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR027-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14 m
From
72 m
To
86 m
Intercept Depth
72 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR027-25:72-86
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
126
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 7.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.5 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary PR027-25 SULPHIDE 72 86 14 0.33 20 0.5 1.7 126 1766”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR027-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR027-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR027-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14 m
From
72 m
To
86 m
Intercept Depth
72 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR027-25:72-86
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
126
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 23.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary PR027-25 SULPHIDE 72 86 14 0.33 20 0.5 1.7 126 1766”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR027-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR028-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 2.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR028-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
2.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
79 m
To
82 m
Intercept Depth
79 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR028-25:79-82
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
432
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.45 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.45 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary PR028-25 SULPHIDE 79 82 3 2.45 98 2 2.2 432 1295”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR028-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR028-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR028-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
98
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
79 m
To
82 m
Intercept Depth
79 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR028-25:79-82
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
432
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 98 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 294.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary PR028-25 SULPHIDE 79 82 3 2.45 98 2 2.2 432 1295”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR028-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR028-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR028-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
79 m
To
82 m
Intercept Depth
79 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR028-25:79-82
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
432
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 6.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary PR028-25 SULPHIDE 79 82 3 2.45 98 2 2.2 432 1295”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR028-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR028-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR028-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
2.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
79 m
To
82 m
Intercept Depth
79 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR028-25:79-82
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
432
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.2 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 6.6 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary PR028-25 SULPHIDE 79 82 3 2.45 98 2 2.2 432 1295”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR028-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR028-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR028-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.38
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17 m
From
92 m
To
109 m
Intercept Depth
92 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR028-25:92-109
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
104
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.38 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.38 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary PR028-25 SULPHIDE 92 109 17 0.38 9 0.2 1.5 104 1762”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR028-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR028-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR028-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17 m
From
92 m
To
109 m
Intercept Depth
92 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR028-25:92-109
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
104
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 153.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary PR028-25 SULPHIDE 92 109 17 0.38 9 0.2 1.5 104 1762”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR028-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR028-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR028-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
17 m
From
92 m
To
109 m
Intercept Depth
92 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR028-25:92-109
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
104
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.2 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary PR028-25 SULPHIDE 92 109 17 0.38 9 0.2 1.5 104 1762”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR028-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR028-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR028-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
17 m
From
92 m
To
109 m
Intercept Depth
92 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR028-25:92-109
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
104
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 25.5 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary PR028-25 SULPHIDE 92 109 17 0.38 9 0.2 1.5 104 1762”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR028-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR029-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 1.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR029-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11 m
From
77 m
To
88 m
Intercept Depth
77 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR029-25:77-88
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
372
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.88 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 20.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary PR029-25 SULPHIDE 77 88 11 1.88 91 1.7 2.2 372 4087”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR029-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR029-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR029-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
91
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11 m
From
77 m
To
88 m
Intercept Depth
77 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR029-25:77-88
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
372
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 91 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1001.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary PR029-25 SULPHIDE 77 88 11 1.88 91 1.7 2.2 372 4087”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR029-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR029-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR029-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11 m
From
77 m
To
88 m
Intercept Depth
77 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR029-25:77-88
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
372
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 18.7 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary PR029-25 SULPHIDE 77 88 11 1.88 91 1.7 2.2 372 4087”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR029-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR029-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR029-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
2.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11 m
From
77 m
To
88 m
Intercept Depth
77 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR029-25:77-88
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
372
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.2 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 24.2 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary PR029-25 SULPHIDE 77 88 11 1.88 91 1.7 2.2 372 4087”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR029-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR030-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR030-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13 m
From
69 m
To
82 m
Intercept Depth
69 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR030-25:69-82
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
185
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.95 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 12.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary PR030-25 SULPHIDE 69 82 13 0.95 35 0.6 1.5 185 2411”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR030-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR030-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR030-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13 m
From
69 m
To
82 m
Intercept Depth
69 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR030-25:69-82
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
185
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 35 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 455.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary PR030-25 SULPHIDE 69 82 13 0.95 35 0.6 1.5 185 2411”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR030-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR030-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR030-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13 m
From
69 m
To
82 m
Intercept Depth
69 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR030-25:69-82
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
185
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 7.8 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.6 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary PR030-25 SULPHIDE 69 82 13 0.95 35 0.6 1.5 185 2411”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR030-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR030-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR030-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13 m
From
69 m
To
82 m
Intercept Depth
69 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR030-25:69-82
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
185
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 19.5 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Savary PR030-25 SULPHIDE 69 82 13 0.95 35 0.6 1.5 185 2411”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR030-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR031-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR031-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17 m
From
34 m
To
51 m
Intercept Depth
34 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR031-25:34-51
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
142
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.43 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.43 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Kasia PR031-25 SULPHIDE 34 51 17 0.43 28 0.5 1.7 142 2417”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR031-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR031-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR031-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17 m
From
34 m
To
51 m
Intercept Depth
34 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR031-25:34-51
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
142
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 28 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 476.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Kasia PR031-25 SULPHIDE 34 51 17 0.43 28 0.5 1.7 142 2417”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR031-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR031-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR031-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
17 m
From
34 m
To
51 m
Intercept Depth
34 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR031-25:34-51
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
142
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 8.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.5 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Kasia PR031-25 SULPHIDE 34 51 17 0.43 28 0.5 1.7 142 2417”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR031-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR031-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR031-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
17 m
From
34 m
To
51 m
Intercept Depth
34 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR031-25:34-51
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
142
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 28.9 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Kasia PR031-25 SULPHIDE 34 51 17 0.43 28 0.5 1.7 142 2417”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR031-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR032-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR032-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17 m
From
45 m
To
62 m
Intercept Depth
45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR032-25:45-62
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
162
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.86 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Kasia PR032-25 SULPHIDE 45 62 17 0.86 37 0.8 0.9 162 2749”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR032-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR032-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR032-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17 m
From
45 m
To
62 m
Intercept Depth
45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR032-25:45-62
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
162
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 37 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 629.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Kasia PR032-25 SULPHIDE 45 62 17 0.86 37 0.8 0.9 162 2749”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR032-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR032-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR032-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
17 m
From
45 m
To
62 m
Intercept Depth
45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR032-25:45-62
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
162
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 13.6 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Kasia PR032-25 SULPHIDE 45 62 17 0.86 37 0.8 0.9 162 2749”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR032-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR032-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR032-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
17 m
From
45 m
To
62 m
Intercept Depth
45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR032-25:45-62
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
162
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 15.3 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Kasia PR032-25 SULPHIDE 45 62 17 0.86 37 0.8 0.9 162 2749”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR032-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR035-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR035-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
80 m
To
90 m
Intercept Depth
80 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR035-25:80-90
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
114
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.09 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Kasia PR035-25 SULPHIDE 80 90 10 0.09 22 0.4 1.9 114 1143”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR035-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR035-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR035-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
80 m
To
90 m
Intercept Depth
80 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR035-25:80-90
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
114
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 220.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Kasia PR035-25 SULPHIDE 80 90 10 0.09 22 0.4 1.9 114 1143”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR035-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR035-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR035-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10 m
From
80 m
To
90 m
Intercept Depth
80 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR035-25:80-90
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
114
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 4.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.4 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Kasia PR035-25 SULPHIDE 80 90 10 0.09 22 0.4 1.9 114 1143”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR035-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR035-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR035-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10 m
From
80 m
To
90 m
Intercept Depth
80 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR035-25:80-90
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
114
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.9 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 19.0 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Kasia PR035-25 SULPHIDE 80 90 10 0.09 22 0.4 1.9 114 1143”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR035-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR036-25Cerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR036-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16 m
From
35 m
To
51 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR036-25:35-51
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
74
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.05 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta NW PR036-25 OXIDE 35 51 16 0.05 15 0.6 1 74 1180”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR036-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR036-25Cerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR036-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
16 m
From
35 m
To
51 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR036-25:35-51
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
74
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 9.6 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.6 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta NW PR036-25 OXIDE 35 51 16 0.05 15 0.6 1 74 1180”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR036-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR036-25Cerro Leon · zincGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR036-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
16 m
From
35 m
To
51 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR036-25:35-51
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM19s

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
74
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 16.0 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Marta NW PR036-25 OXIDE 35 51 16 0.05 15 0.6 1 74 1180”

Context: Table 2: Cerro Leon Project - Mineral Resource Estimate · PR036-25 · Columns: Prospect | Hole ID | Mineralisation | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Resource Estimates (6)

indicatedJoaquin · silverTonnes: 15700000Grade: 128Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 65.2Contained Unit: mozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2013-02-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
Resource group id
resource:f10ccbc7ca20216c2b77

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
15700000
Grade
128
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
65.2
Contained Unit
moz

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
138
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“128”

Context: 15.7

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

indicatedJoaquin · goldTonnes: 15700000Grade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 61.1Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2013-02-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
Resource group id
resource:f10ccbc7ca20216c2b77

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
15700000
Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
61.1
Contained Unit
koz

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
138
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 15.7

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredJoaquin · silverTonnes: 1000000Grade: 100Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3.1Contained Unit: mozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2013-02-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
Resource group id
resource:3ce49c91ddb099c791ff

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1000000
Grade
100
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
3.1
Contained Unit
moz

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
110
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“100”

Context: 1

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredJoaquin · goldTonnes: 1000000Grade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3.7Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2013-02-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
Resource group id
resource:3ce49c91ddb099c791ff

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1000000
Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
3.7
Contained Unit
koz

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
110
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 1

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredJoaquin · silverTonnes: 16700000Grade: 126Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 68.3Contained Unit: mozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2013-02-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
Resource group id
resource:61afd92e6ae79bc81e26

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
16700000
Grade
126
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
68.3
Contained Unit
moz

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
136
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“126”

Context: 16.7

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredJoaquin · goldTonnes: 16700000Grade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 64.2Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2013-02-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
Resource group id
resource:61afd92e6ae79bc81e26

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
16700000
Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
64.2
Contained Unit
koz

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
136
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 16.7

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.