Champs D'or en Beauce Realise un Taux de Reussite de Forage de 88% une Interpretation 3D Confirme un Corridor Mineralise de 600 M
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Beauce Gold Fields
- Ticker
- BGF
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Québec, Canada
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-13 14:53:41 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Beauce Gold Fields announced a new 3D geological model integrating 2023 and 2025 drill data, confirming a 600-meter mineralized corridor at the Grondin zone with an 88% drill success rate. The model provides the first 3D visualization of the 'saddle reef' gold structure, which remains open laterally and at depth. While the drill results presented are historical, the new interpretation and high success rate are seen as significant for future exploration targeting.
Reasoning: The announcement presents a new 3D interpretation of historical drill data from 2023 and 2025 campaigns, confirming a 600m mineralized corridor with an 88% drill success rate. While the intercepts themselves are historical, the new geological model and confirmed continuity are positive for future exploration, with several high-grade gold results. The lack of true width disclosure is a minor negative.
Positive factors
- High drill success rate (88%) confirming continuity over 600m
- New 3D geological model enhances understanding and targeting
- Multiple high-grade gold intercepts (up to 11.4 g/t Au)
- QA/QC procedures and QP sign-off disclosed
Negative factors
- All reported drill results are historical re-releases, reducing novelty of the intercepts themselves
- True width of intercepts not disclosed
- Some lower-grade intercepts reported
Facts used in scoring: 48
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release mentions rigorous QA/QC protocols, insertion of standards and blanks, and samples sent to MSALABS.
Evidence · text
“Procédures analytiques et QA/QC Les procédures utilisées pour les résultats de forage du tableau, lesquels avaient déjà été publiés dans les communiqués de presse des 1er novembre 2023 et 11 septembre, ont suivi des protocoles rigoureux d’assurance et de contrôle de la qualité (QA/QC). Tous les forages ont produit des carottes HQ et NQ. Les carottes ont été sciées en deux à l’aide d’une scie au diamant. Une moitié de carotte a été échantillonnée et scellée dans des sacs en plastique propres avant d’être expédiée pour analyse. Des étalons et des blancs ont été insérés sur le site. L’autre moitié des carottes a été replacée dans les boîtes à carottes et entreposée dans l'entrepôt de la Société à Saint-Simon-les-Mines, au Québec. Les échantillons ont été envoyés à MSALABS, Val-d’Or, Québec.”
QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Jean Bernard, B.Sc., géo., an independent qualified person under NI 43-101, reviewed and approved the technical content.
Evidence · text
“Jean Bernard, B.Sc., géo., personne indépendante qualifiée selon le Règlement NI 43-101, a révisé et approuvé le contenu technique du présent communiqué.”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The 3D model confirms a 600m mineralized corridor, indicating extension of mineralization.
Evidence · text
“Un corridor minéralisé de 600 m s’étendant de GR-23-08 à GR-25-08.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document reports downhole intercept lengths but does not provide true width or drill orientation information.
Evidence · text
“Intervale (m)”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: The release explicitly states that the drill results in the table were previously published in earlier news releases.
Evidence · text
“les résultats de forage du tableau, lesquels avaient déjà été publiés dans les communiqués de presse des 1er novembre 2023 et 11 septembre”
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: The intercept of 0.5m at 11.4 g/t gold is well above the exceptional threshold for orogenic gold deposits.
Evidence · table
“11.4”
Context: 0.5
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: The intercept of 0.5m at 10.88 g/t gold is well above the exceptional threshold for orogenic gold deposits.
Evidence · table
“10.88”
Context: 0.5
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: The intercept of 1m at 8.85 g/t gold is well above the exceptional threshold for orogenic gold deposits.
Evidence · table
“8.85”
Context: 1
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: The intercept of 2.2m at 5.4 g/t gold is well above the exceptional threshold for orogenic gold deposits.
Evidence · table
“5.4”
Context: 2.2
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: The intercept of 0.5m at 5.2 g/t gold is well above the exceptional threshold for orogenic gold deposits.
Evidence · table
“5,2”
Context: 0,5
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 48. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (48)
RG-23-01goldGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RG-23-01
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 11 m
- To
- 14 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RG-23-01:11-14
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate gold intercept for an orogenic deposit, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: 3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
RG-23-01goldGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RG-23-01
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 12.5 m
- To
- 13.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RG-23-01:12.5-13.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong gold intercept over a narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“2.5”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
RG-23-01goldGrade: 5.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RG-23-01
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.2 m
- From
- 17.3 m
- To
- 19.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RG-23-01:17.3-19.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptional gold intercept over a moderate width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“5.4”
Context: 2.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
RG-23-01goldGrade: 8.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RG-23-01
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 18.5 m
- To
- 19.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RG-23-01:18.5-19.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptional gold intercept over a narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“8.85”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
RG-23-01goldGrade: 11.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RG-23-01
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 19 m
- To
- 19.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RG-23-01:19-19.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptional gold intercept over a very narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“11.4”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
RG-23-01goldGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RG-23-01
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 21.5 m
- To
- 24 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RG-23-01:21.5-24
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate gold intercept over a narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“1.8”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
RG-23-04goldGrade: 1.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RG-23-04
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 8.5 m
- To
- 14.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RG-23-04:8.5-14.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate gold intercept over a moderate width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“1.08”
Context: 6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
RG-23-04goldGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RG-23-04
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 12 m
- To
- 14 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RG-23-04:12-14
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate gold intercept over a narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“1.9”
Context: 2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
RG-23-04goldGrade: 3.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RG-23-04
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 13 m
- To
- 13.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RG-23-04:13-13.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong gold intercept over a very narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“3.6”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
RG-23-05goldGrade: 3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RG-23-05
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 37.5 m
- To
- 41 m
- Intercept Depth
- 37.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RG-23-05:37.5-41
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong gold intercept over a narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“3”
Context: 3.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
RG-23-05goldGrade: 6.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RG-23-05
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 38 m
- To
- 39 m
- Intercept Depth
- 37.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RG-23-05:38-39
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptional gold intercept over a narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“6.5”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
RG-23-05goldGrade: 10.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RG-23-05
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.88
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 38 m
- To
- 38.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 37.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RG-23-05:38-38.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptional gold intercept over a very narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“10.88”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
RG-23-06goldGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RG-23-06
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 42.5 m
- To
- 43 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RG-23-06:42.5-43
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong gold intercept over a very narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“2.8”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
RG-23-06goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RG-23-06
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 45.5 m
- To
- 47.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RG-23-06:45.5-47.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A weak gold intercept below the economic threshold, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
- Below weak grade threshold
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: 2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
RG-23-07goldGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RG-23-07
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 34 m
- To
- 36.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RG-23-07:34-36.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A weak gold intercept over a narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“0.51”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
RG-23-07goldGrade: 0.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RG-23-07
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.81
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 35.5 m
- To
- 36.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RG-23-07:35.5-36.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A weak gold intercept over a narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“0.81”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
RG-23-07goldGrade: 1.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RG-23-07
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 36 m
- To
- 36.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RG-23-07:36-36.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate gold intercept over a very narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“1.27”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
RG-23-07goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RG-23-07
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 37.5 m
- To
- 39 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RG-23-07:37.5-39
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A weak gold intercept over a very narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“0.35”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
RG-23-07goldGrade: 0.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RG-23-07
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.92
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 50 m
- To
- 51 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RG-23-07:50-51
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A weak gold intercept over a narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“0.92”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
RG-23-07goldGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RG-23-07
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 50.5 m
- To
- 51 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RG-23-07:50.5-51
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate gold intercept over a very narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
RG-23-08goldGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RG-23-08
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 27 m
- To
- 28 m
- Intercept Depth
- 27 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RG-23-08:27-28
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A weak gold intercept over a narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“0.31”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
RG-23-08goldGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RG-23-08
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- From
- 48.2 m
- To
- 50 m
- Intercept Depth
- 27 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RG-23-08:48.2-50
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate gold intercept over a narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“1.1”
Context: 1.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
RG-23-08goldGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RG-23-08
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 48.5 m
- To
- 49 m
- Intercept Depth
- 27 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RG-23-08:48.5-49
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong gold intercept over a very narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“2.2”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
GR-25-01goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GR-25-01
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 48 m
- To
- 48.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 48 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GR-25-01:48-48.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A weak gold intercept over a very narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“0,4”
Context: 0,5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
GR-25-01goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GR-25-01
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 49 m
- To
- 50.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 48 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GR-25-01:49-50.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A weak gold intercept below the economic threshold, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
- Below weak grade threshold
Evidence · table
“0,25”
Context: 1,5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
GR-25-01goldGrade: 0.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GR-25-01
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.93
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 55 m
- To
- 60 m
- Intercept Depth
- 48 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GR-25-01:55-60
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A weak gold intercept over a moderate width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“0,93”
Context: 4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
GR-25-01goldGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GR-25-01
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 57.5 m
- To
- 58.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 48 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GR-25-01:57.5-58.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong gold intercept over a narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
GR-25-01goldGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GR-25-01
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 58.5 m
- To
- 59 m
- Intercept Depth
- 48 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GR-25-01:58.5-59
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong gold intercept over a very narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“2,3”
Context: 0,5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
GR-25-02goldGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GR-25-02
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 20 m
- To
- 24 m
- Intercept Depth
- 20 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GR-25-02:20-24
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong gold intercept over a moderate width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: 4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
GR-25-02goldGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GR-25-02
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 21.5 m
- To
- 22.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 20 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GR-25-02:21.5-22.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong gold intercept over a narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“2,8”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
GR-25-02goldGrade: 5.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GR-25-02
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 22.5 m
- To
- 23 m
- Intercept Depth
- 20 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GR-25-02:22.5-23
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptional gold intercept over a very narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“5,2”
Context: 0,5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
GR-25-02goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GR-25-02
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 41 m
- To
- 43 m
- Intercept Depth
- 20 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GR-25-02:41-43
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A weak gold intercept over a narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“0,6”
Context: 2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
GR-25-03goldGrade: 0.106Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GR-25-03
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.106
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 55 m
- To
- 55.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GR-25-03:55-55.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A weak gold intercept below the economic threshold, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
- Below weak grade threshold
Evidence · table
“0,106”
Context: 0,5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
GR-25-04goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GR-25-04
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 30.5 m
- To
- 33.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GR-25-04:30.5-33.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A weak gold intercept over a narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“0,35”
Context: 3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
GR-25-04goldGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GR-25-04
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 42.5 m
- To
- 46.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GR-25-04:42.5-46.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A weak gold intercept over a moderate width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“0,51”
Context: 4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
GR-25-04goldGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GR-25-04
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 42.5 m
- To
- 43.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GR-25-04:42.5-43.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate gold intercept over a narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“1,1”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
GR-25-05goldGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GR-25-05
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.5 m
- From
- 31.5 m
- To
- 37 m
- Intercept Depth
- 31.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GR-25-05:31.5-37
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A weak gold intercept over a moderate width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“0,34”
Context: 5,5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
GR-25-05goldGrade: 0.791Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GR-25-05
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.791
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 32 m
- To
- 32.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 31.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GR-25-05:32-32.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A weak gold intercept over a very narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“0,791”
Context: 0,5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
GR-25-05goldGrade: 0.195Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GR-25-05
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.195
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 32.5 m
- To
- 33 m
- Intercept Depth
- 31.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GR-25-05:32.5-33
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A weak gold intercept below the economic threshold, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
- Below weak grade threshold
Evidence · table
“0,195”
Context: 0,5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
GR-26-06goldGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GR-26-06
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- From
- 22.5 m
- To
- 22.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GR-26-06:22.5-22.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A weak gold intercept below the economic threshold, but the result is historical, only apparent width is provided, and there is an inconsistency in the reported depths and interval.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
- Below weak grade threshold
- Inconsistent from/to depth and interval in source table
Evidence · table
“0,22”
Context: 1,9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
GR-26-06goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GR-26-06
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 26.5 m
- To
- 32.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GR-26-06:26.5-32.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A weak gold intercept over a moderate width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“0,33”
Context: 6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
GR-26-06goldGrade: 1.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GR-26-06
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 47.5 m
- To
- 49.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GR-26-06:47.5-49.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate gold intercept over a narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“1,15”
Context: 2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
GR-26-06goldGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GR-26-06
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 48.5 m
- To
- 49 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GR-26-06:48.5-49
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong gold intercept over a very narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“2,4”
Context: 0,5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
GR-25-07goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GR-25-07
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 15.5 m
- To
- 16.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 15.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GR-25-07:15.5-16.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A weak gold intercept over a narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“0,6”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
GR-27-08goldGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GR-27-08
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.5 m
- From
- 30.5 m
- To
- 40 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GR-27-08:30.5-40
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A weak gold intercept over a strong width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“0,8”
Context: 9,5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
GR-27-08goldGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GR-27-08
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 32 m
- To
- 33 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GR-27-08:32-33
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong gold intercept over a narrow width, but the result is historical and only apparent width is provided.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · table
“2,3”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
GR-23-02goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GR-23-02
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This hole returned no significant gold mineralization, indicating a barren zone, and the result is historical.
Negative factors
- Barren hole
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · text
“GR-23-02 : zone minéralisée légèrement observée, teneur en or sous 0,300 ppm”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
RG-23-03goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RG-23-03
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGF
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSALABS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This hole returned no significant gold mineralization, indicating a barren zone, and the result is historical.
Negative factors
- Barren hole
- Historical data re-release
Evidence · text
“RG-23-03 : aucune zone d’intérêt n’a été identifiée dans ce forage”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.