Chibougamau Announces New Polymetallic Intersections at Depth on its Berrigan Mine Property
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Chibougamau Independent Mines Inc.
- Ticker
- CBG
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Quebec
- Primary commodity
- Zinc
- Secondary commodities
- Gold, Silver, Copper
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-17 14:51:13 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Chibougamau Independent Mines announced new polymetallic drill results from the Berrigan Mine Property in Quebec, reporting significant intersections at depth. Hole TOM-25-011EXT intersected a 204.25-meter mineralized envelope grading 2.05% ZnEq (0.48 g/t AuEq), including a high-grade section of 2.40 meters at 31.31% ZnEq (7.38 g/t AuEq). These results validate the geological model and confirm the vertical continuity of the polymetallic hydrothermal system, with assay results for four other extension holes pending.
Reasoning: The drill results from hole TOM-25-011EXT show significant polymetallic mineralization at depth, including a very high-grade gold and zinc equivalent intercept over 2.40m within a broader 204.25m mineralized envelope. This validates the geological model and extends mineralization, indicating strong exploration potential. While true width is estimated and specific QA/QC methods are not detailed, the overall results are highly positive for the project.
Positive factors
- Significant polymetallic intersections at depth, including high-grade zones, validating geological model.
- Broad mineralized envelope (204.25 m) indicates scale of the system.
- High-grade gold and zinc equivalents reported.
- QP sign-off and NI 43-101 compliance.
Negative factors
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated for each intercept.
- No specific QA/QC methods (blanks, standards, duplicates) or lab certification mentioned.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical metallurgical report and recoveries from nearby deposits, not current testwork.
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 97
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: The intercept of 31.31% ZnEq (7.38 g/t AuEq) over 2.40 m is exceptionally high-grade for both zinc and gold equivalents.
Evidence · text
“31.31% ZnEq (7.38 g/t AuEq) over 2.40 m (from 554.40 m to 556.80 m)”
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: Metal equivalent calculations rely on a metallurgical report from 2002 and recoveries from nearby deposits, which may not be fully representative of current conditions or the specific mineralization encountered.
Evidence · text
“applying metallurgical recovery factors of 95% for zinc, 85% for gold and silver, and 90% for copper, based on a metallurgical report on Berrigan Mine zinc material prepared by Process Research Associates Ltd. in February 2002 and on recoveries from nearby deposits for gold, silver and copper.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The reported widths represent core lengths, and true width is only estimated as a percentage of core length, not explicitly stated for each intercept.
Evidence · text
“The reported widths represent core lengths. True width is estimated to be approximately 80-85% of the core length, depending on the deviation angles.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The press release explicitly states that the content was written and approved by Qualified Persons under NI 43-101.
Evidence · text
“This press release was written by Jack Stoch, P. Geo., President and CEO of Chibougamau Independent Mines Inc. and David Christie P. Geo., as consultant to the company in their capacity as Qualified Person (Q.P.) under NI 43-101 and approved by Suzie Tremblay, P.Geo., Vice President of Operations at Explo-Logik Inc. and a consultant to TomaGold, each acting as a Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101.”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The drilling program involved 'extension holes' designed to test 'modeled conductive plates at depth' within the Berrigan Deep Zone, indicating an expansion of known mineralization.
Evidence · text
“The extension of hole TOM-25-011 was designed by TomaGold to test modeled conductive plates at depth within the Berrigan Deep Zone.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 97. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (97)
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12.45 m
- From
- 498.3 m
- To
- 510.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:498.3-510.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.02
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % ZnEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This ZnEq intercept is moderate and contributes to the overall polymetallic value. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling, but confidence is slightly reduced due to reliance on historical equivalent assumptions.
Positive factors
- Moderate ZnEq grade over a good intercept length.
Negative factors
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“3.02”
Context: 12.45
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.45 m
- From
- 498.3 m
- To
- 510.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:498.3-510.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.71
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The AuEq grade in this intercept is relatively low for an underground target, but it adds to the overall polymetallic value. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling, but confidence is slightly reduced due to reliance on historical equivalent assumptions.
Positive factors
- AuEq grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- AuEq grade is below typical underground thresholds.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“0.71”
Context: 12.45
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.45 m
- From
- 498.3 m
- To
- 510.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:498.3-510.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.02
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade in this intercept is very low, but it is part of the broader polymetallic system. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Silver grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is very low.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“1.30”
Context: 12.45
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12.45 m
- From
- 498.3 m
- To
- 510.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:498.3-510.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.02
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The copper grade in this intercept is very low, but it is part of the broader polymetallic system. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Copper grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- Copper grade is very low.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 12.45
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 7.94Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.94
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 498.3 m
- To
- 499.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:498.3-499.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 16.23
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % ZnEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional ZnEq grade over a narrow width, indicating a high-grade lens within the broader mineralization. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling, but confidence is slightly reduced due to reliance on historical equivalent assumptions.
Positive factors
- Exceptional ZnEq grade over a narrow but significant intercept.
Negative factors
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“16.23”
Context: 1.40
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 2.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 498.3 m
- To
- 499.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:498.3-499.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.78
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong AuEq grade over a narrow width, contributing to the high-grade lens within the broader mineralization. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling, but confidence is slightly reduced due to reliance on historical equivalent assumptions.
Positive factors
- Strong AuEq grade over a narrow but significant intercept.
Negative factors
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“3.78”
Context: 1.40
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 5.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 498.3 m
- To
- 499.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:498.3-499.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 16.23
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade in this intercept is very low, but it is part of the broader polymetallic system. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Silver grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is very low.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“5.60”
Context: 1.40
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 498.3 m
- To
- 499.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:498.3-499.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 16.23
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The copper grade in this intercept is very low, but it is part of the broader polymetallic system. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Copper grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- Copper grade is very low.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: 1.40
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.76
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 507.85 m
- To
- 510.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:507.85-510.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.52
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % ZnEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This ZnEq intercept is moderate and contributes to the overall polymetallic value. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling, but confidence is slightly reduced due to reliance on historical equivalent assumptions.
Positive factors
- Moderate ZnEq grade over a narrow intercept.
Negative factors
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“4.52”
Context: 2.90
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 1.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 507.85 m
- To
- 510.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:507.85-510.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.06
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The AuEq grade in this intercept is relatively low for an underground target, but it adds to the overall polymetallic value. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling, but confidence is slightly reduced due to reliance on historical equivalent assumptions.
Positive factors
- AuEq grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- AuEq grade is below typical underground thresholds.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“1.06”
Context: 2.90
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 1.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 507.85 m
- To
- 510.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:507.85-510.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.52
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade in this intercept is very low, but it is part of the broader polymetallic system. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Silver grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is very low.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“1.51”
Context: 2.90
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 507.85 m
- To
- 510.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:507.85-510.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.52
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The copper grade in this intercept is very low, but it is part of the broader polymetallic system. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Copper grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- Copper grade is very low.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 2.90
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 5.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.81
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.95 m
- From
- 522.25 m
- To
- 524.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:522.25-524.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % ZnEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade in this intercept is very low, but it is part of the broader polymetallic system. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Silver grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is very low.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“5.81”
Context: 1.95
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.95 m
- From
- 522.25 m
- To
- 524.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:522.25-524.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % ZnEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The copper grade in this intercept is very low, but it is part of the broader polymetallic system. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Copper grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- Copper grade is very low.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: 1.95
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 2.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 204.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 204.25 m
- From
- 553.9 m
- To
- 758.15 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:553.9-758.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.05
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % ZnEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very long intercept with a very low silver grade is material due to its width, indicating a significant mineralized envelope at depth. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Very long intercept length (204.25 m) indicates a broad mineralized system.
- Silver grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is very low.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“2.43”
Context: 204.25
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 204.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 204.25 m
- From
- 553.9 m
- To
- 758.15 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:553.9-758.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.05
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % ZnEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very long intercept with a very low copper grade is material due to its width, indicating a significant mineralized envelope at depth. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Very long intercept length (204.25 m) indicates a broad mineralized system.
- Copper grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- Copper grade is very low.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: 204.25
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 6.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 51.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 51.5 m
- From
- 553.9 m
- To
- 605.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:553.9-605.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % ZnEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This long intercept with a very low silver grade is material due to its width, indicating good continuity within the mineralized envelope. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Long intercept length (51.5 m) indicates good continuity.
- Silver grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is very low.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“6.11”
Context: 51.50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 51.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 51.5 m
- From
- 553.9 m
- To
- 605.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:553.9-605.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % ZnEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This long intercept with a very low copper grade is material due to its width, indicating good continuity within the mineralized envelope. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Long intercept length (51.5 m) indicates good continuity.
- Copper grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- Copper grade is very low.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: 51.50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 98.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 98.21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 554.4 m
- To
- 556.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:554.4-556.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 31.31
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % ZnEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the high-grade lens within the broader mineralization. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade over a narrow but significant intercept.
Negative factors
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“98.21”
Context: 2.40
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 1.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.28
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 554.4 m
- To
- 556.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:554.4-556.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 31.31
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % ZnEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the high-grade lens within the broader mineralization. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Strong copper grade over a narrow but significant intercept.
Negative factors
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“1.28”
Context: 2.40
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- From
- 560.6 m
- To
- 561.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:560.6-561.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.06
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % ZnEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade in this intercept is very low, but it is part of the broader polymetallic system. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Silver grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is very low.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“2.50”
Context: 1.15
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- From
- 560.6 m
- To
- 561.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:560.6-561.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.06
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % ZnEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The copper grade in this intercept is very low, but it is part of the broader polymetallic system. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Copper grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- Copper grade is very low.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: 1.15
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 1.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- From
- 574.65 m
- To
- 576.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:574.65-576.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % ZnEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade in this intercept is very low, but it is part of the broader polymetallic system. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Silver grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is very low.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“1.62”
Context: 2.25
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- From
- 574.65 m
- To
- 576.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:574.65-576.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % ZnEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The copper grade in this intercept is very low, but it is part of the broader polymetallic system. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Copper grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- Copper grade is very low.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: 2.25
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 3.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.44
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.4 m
- From
- 591 m
- To
- 605.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:591-605.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.62
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % ZnEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low silver grade over a good length, contributing to the overall polymetallic mineralization. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Silver grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is very low.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“3.44”
Context: 14.40
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 14.4 m
- From
- 591 m
- To
- 605.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:591-605.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.62
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % ZnEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low copper grade over a good length, contributing to the overall polymetallic mineralization. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Copper grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- Copper grade is very low.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 14.40
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 1.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.75 m
- From
- 639.25 m
- To
- 645 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:639.25-645
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % ZnEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low silver grade over a good length, contributing to the overall polymetallic mineralization. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Silver grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is very low.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“1.27”
Context: 5.75
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.75 m
- From
- 639.25 m
- To
- 645 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:639.25-645
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % ZnEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low copper grade over a good length, contributing to the overall polymetallic mineralization. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Copper grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- Copper grade is very low.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 5.75
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 1.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.67
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 655.5 m
- To
- 665.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:655.5-665.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.29
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % ZnEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low silver grade over a good length, contributing to the overall polymetallic mineralization. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Silver grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is very low.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“1.67”
Context: 10.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 655.5 m
- To
- 665.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:655.5-665.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.29
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % ZnEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low copper grade over a good length, contributing to the overall polymetallic mineralization. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Copper grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- Copper grade is very low.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 10.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 1.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 681.55 m
- To
- 686.15 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:681.55-686.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.93
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % ZnEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low silver grade over a good length, contributing to the overall polymetallic mineralization. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Silver grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is very low.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“1.64”
Context: 4.60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 681.55 m
- To
- 686.15 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:681.55-686.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.93
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % ZnEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low copper grade over a good length, contributing to the overall polymetallic mineralization. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Copper grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- Copper grade is very low.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 4.60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 3.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.24
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.45 m
- From
- 697.05 m
- To
- 704.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:697.05-704.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % ZnEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low silver grade over a good length, contributing to the overall polymetallic mineralization. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Silver grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is very low.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“3.24”
Context: 7.45
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.45 m
- From
- 697.05 m
- To
- 704.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:697.05-704.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % ZnEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low copper grade over a good length, contributing to the overall polymetallic mineralization. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Copper grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- Copper grade is very low.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: 7.45
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.93Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.93
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 715.5 m
- To
- 722 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:715.5-722
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate zinc grade over a good length, contributing to the overall polymetallic mineralization. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Moderate zinc grade over a good intercept length.
Negative factors
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“1.93”
Context: 6.50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.61
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 715.5 m
- To
- 722 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:715.5-722
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low gold grade over a good length, contributing to the overall polymetallic mineralization. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Gold grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- Gold grade is very low.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“0.61”
Context: 6.50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 715.5 m
- To
- 722 m
- Hole Depth
- 834.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:715.5-722
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 542320
- Northing
- 5532728
- Elevation
- 390 m
- Azimuth
- 130.49 °
- Dip
- -55.03 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low silver grade over a good length, contributing to the overall polymetallic mineralization. The novelty is high as it's part of new extension drilling.
Positive factors
- Silver grade contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is very low.
- True width is an estimate, not explicitly stated.
- Metal equivalent assumptions rely on historical data.
Evidence · table
“1.70”
Context: 6.50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.95 m
- From
- 522.25 m
- To
- 524.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 522.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:522.25-524.2
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.27 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.27 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.27”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 5.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.81
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.95 m
- From
- 522.25 m
- To
- 524.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 522.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:522.25-524.2
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.81 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.81 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.81”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.95 m
- From
- 522.25 m
- To
- 524.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 522.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:522.25-524.2
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.04 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.97Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.97
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.95 m
- From
- 522.25 m
- To
- 524.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 522.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:522.25-524.2
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.97 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.8 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.97 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.97”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 204.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 204.25 m
- From
- 553.9 m
- To
- 758.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:553.9-758.15
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.05
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.35 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 71.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.35”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 2.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 204.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 204.25 m
- From
- 553.9 m
- To
- 758.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:553.9-758.15
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.05
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.43 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 496.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.43”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 204.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 204.25 m
- From
- 553.9 m
- To
- 758.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:553.9-758.15
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.05
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 8.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.04 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: %Intercept: 204.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.58
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 204.25 m
- From
- 553.9 m
- To
- 758.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:553.9-758.15
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.05
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.58 % zinc is strong against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 118.5 %·m is strong (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.58 % zinc is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.58”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 51.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 51.5 m
- From
- 553.9 m
- To
- 605.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:553.9-605.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.58 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 29.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.58”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 6.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 51.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 51.5 m
- From
- 553.9 m
- To
- 605.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:553.9-605.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.11 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 314.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.11”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 51.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 51.5 m
- From
- 553.9 m
- To
- 605.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:553.9-605.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 4.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.09 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: %Intercept: 51.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.65
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 51.5 m
- From
- 553.9 m
- To
- 605.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:553.9-605.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.65 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 33.5 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.65”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 5.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.89
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 554.4 m
- To
- 556.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 554.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:554.4-556.8
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 31.31
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.89 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.89”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 98.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 98.21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 554.4 m
- To
- 556.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 554.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:554.4-556.8
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 31.31
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 98.21 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 235.7 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“98.21”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 1.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.28
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 554.4 m
- To
- 556.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 554.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:554.4-556.8
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 31.31
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.28 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.1 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.28 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.28”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.75
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 554.4 m
- To
- 556.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 554.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:554.4-556.8
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 31.31
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.75 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 4.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.75 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.75”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- From
- 560.6 m
- To
- 561.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 560.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:560.6-561.75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.06
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.15 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.15 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.15”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- From
- 560.6 m
- To
- 561.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 560.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:560.6-561.75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.06
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.50”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- From
- 560.6 m
- To
- 561.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 560.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:560.6-561.75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.06
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.06 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 3.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.39
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- From
- 560.6 m
- To
- 561.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 560.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:560.6-561.75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.06
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.39 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.9 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.39”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- From
- 574.65 m
- To
- 576.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 574.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:574.65-576.9
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.6 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.60”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 1.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- From
- 574.65 m
- To
- 576.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 574.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:574.65-576.9
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.62 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.62 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.62”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- From
- 574.65 m
- To
- 576.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 574.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:574.65-576.9
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.04 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 0.85Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.85
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- From
- 574.65 m
- To
- 576.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 574.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:574.65-576.9
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.85 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.9 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.85 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.85”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.84
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.4 m
- From
- 591 m
- To
- 605.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 591 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:591-605.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.62
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.84 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 12.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.84”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 3.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.44
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.4 m
- From
- 591 m
- To
- 605.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 591 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:591-605.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.62
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.44 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 49.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.44 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.44”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 14.4 m
- From
- 591 m
- To
- 605.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 591 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:591-605.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.62
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.05 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.35
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 14.4 m
- From
- 591 m
- To
- 605.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 591 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:591-605.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.62
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.35 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 19.4 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.35”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.75 m
- From
- 639.25 m
- To
- 645 m
- Intercept Depth
- 639.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:639.25-645
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.43 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.43 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.43”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 1.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.75 m
- From
- 639.25 m
- To
- 645 m
- Intercept Depth
- 639.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:639.25-645
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.27 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.27 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.27”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.75 m
- From
- 639.25 m
- To
- 645 m
- Intercept Depth
- 639.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:639.25-645
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.61Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.61
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.75 m
- From
- 639.25 m
- To
- 645 m
- Intercept Depth
- 639.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:639.25-645
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.61 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 9.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.61 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.61”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 655.5 m
- To
- 665.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 655.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:655.5-665.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.29
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.41 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.41 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.41”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 1.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.67
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 655.5 m
- To
- 665.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 655.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:655.5-665.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.29
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.67 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 16.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.67 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.67”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 655.5 m
- To
- 665.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 655.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:655.5-665.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.29
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.77Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.77
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 655.5 m
- To
- 665.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 655.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:655.5-665.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.29
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.77 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 17.7 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.77”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 681.55 m
- To
- 686.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 681.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:681.55-686.15
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.93
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.85 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.85 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.85”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 1.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 681.55 m
- To
- 686.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 681.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:681.55-686.15
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.93
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.64 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.64 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.64”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 681.55 m
- To
- 686.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 681.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:681.55-686.15
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.93
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 2.88Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.88
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 681.55 m
- To
- 686.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 681.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:681.55-686.15
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.93
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.88 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 13.2 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.88”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.88
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.45 m
- From
- 697.05 m
- To
- 704.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 697.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:697.05-704.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.88 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.88 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.88”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 3.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.24
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.45 m
- From
- 697.05 m
- To
- 704.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 697.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:697.05-704.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.24 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.24 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.24”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.45 m
- From
- 697.05 m
- To
- 704.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 697.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:697.05-704.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.04 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 2.56Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.56
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.45 m
- From
- 697.05 m
- To
- 704.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 697.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:697.05-704.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.56 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 19.1 %·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.56”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.61
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 715.5 m
- To
- 722 m
- Intercept Depth
- 715.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:715.5-722
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.61 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.61 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.61”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 715.5 m
- To
- 722 m
- Intercept Depth
- 715.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:715.5-722
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.70”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 715.5 m
- To
- 722 m
- Intercept Depth
- 715.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:715.5-722
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.93Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.93
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 715.5 m
- To
- 722 m
- Intercept Depth
- 715.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:715.5-722
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.93 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 12.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.93 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.93”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.7 m
- From
- 730.6 m
- To
- 732.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 730.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:730.6-732.3
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.25
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.26 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.26 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.26”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.61
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.7 m
- From
- 730.6 m
- To
- 732.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 730.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:730.6-732.3
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.25
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.61 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.61 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.61”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.7 m
- From
- 730.6 m
- To
- 732.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 730.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:730.6-732.3
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.25
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.7 m
- From
- 730.6 m
- To
- 732.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 730.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:730.6-732.3
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.25
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.29 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.29 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.29”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.95
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.65 m
- From
- 739.5 m
- To
- 758.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 739.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:739.5-758.15
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.72
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.95 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.95”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 2.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.65 m
- From
- 739.5 m
- To
- 758.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 739.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:739.5-758.15
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.72
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.31 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 43.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.31 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.31”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 18.65 m
- From
- 739.5 m
- To
- 758.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 739.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:739.5-758.15
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.72
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.03 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 18.65 m
- From
- 739.5 m
- To
- 758.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 739.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:739.5-758.15
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.72
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.9 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.44
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.4 m
- From
- 774 m
- To
- 778.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 774 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:774-778.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.78
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.44 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.44 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.44”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 0.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.4 m
- From
- 774 m
- To
- 778.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 774 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:774-778.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.78
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.87 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.87 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.87”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.4 m
- From
- 774 m
- To
- 778.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 774 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:774-778.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.78
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CBG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.4 m
- From
- 774 m
- To
- 778.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 774 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:774-778.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.78
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.11 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.