# Clarification: Historical Mineral Resource Estimate at Roger Project Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/clarification-historical-mineral-resource-estimate-at-roger-project--42dcee53-9963-4f8a-9824-56b7701b59f1 Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/AUME/news/5635552374446879/clarification-historical-mineral-resource-estimate-at-roger-project Publisher: tmx Original announcement: 2025-08-06T16:41:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: Unknown date Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date - Company: KINTAVAR EXPLORATION INC. - Ticker: KTR - Exchange: TSX - Region: Quebec - Primary commodity: Gold - Secondary commodities: Silver, Copper - Document categories: Resource update - Extracted: 2026-09-17 11:31:26 UTC Narrative sentiment: -0.20 · Bearish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Kintavar Exploration Inc. issued a clarification regarding the Roger Project, noting that previously disclosed resource figures are historical estimates under NI 43-101 standards. The company emphasized that these figures have not been verified as current resources and requires additional drilling and studies to upgrade them. Reasoning: The document is a clarification reissuing historical resource data for the Roger Project to ensure NI 43-101 compliance. While it provides specific tonnage and grade figures, the company explicitly states these are historical, unverified, and not treated as current resources. - Positive factor: Historical resource base established - Negative factor: Historical estimate status - Negative factor: Lack of current verification - Negative factor: Reliability unconfirmed Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source. Facts used in scoring: 6 ## Classification and evidence **Historical Estimate Only** Polarity: negative Definition: Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling. Why it applies: The company clarifies that the Roger Project estimates are historical and not current mineral resources. Evidence · text > the estimates provided... did not contain a current mineral resource estimate and such information is provided as a "historical estimate" **No QP/CP Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience. Why it applies: The company states a qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify these as current resources. Evidence · text > A qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimates referenced herein as current mineral resources or mineral reserves ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 6. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Resource Estimates (6) ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/clarification-historical-mineral-resource-estimate-at-roger-project--42dcee53-9963-4f8a-9824-56b7701b59f1#fact-resource-facts-0) Roger Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Roger Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_qc - Reported Region: Quebec - Ticker: KTR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Resource group id: resource:f432e9fd0800a47ecb73 - Deposit or zone: Roger deposit #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 10900000 - Grade: 0.85 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 333000 - Contained Unit: oz - Cutoff Grade: 0.45 - Cutoff Unit: g/t Aueq #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2018-10-09T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2025-08-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Indicated resource component of a historical estimate. - Negative factor: Historical status Evidence · text > an Indicated Resource was estimated to be 10,900,000\* metric tonnes at a grade of 0.85 g/t of gold #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 6.8 years before this release ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/clarification-historical-mineral-resource-estimate-at-roger-project--42dcee53-9963-4f8a-9824-56b7701b59f1#fact-resource-facts-1) Roger Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Roger Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_qc - Reported Region: Quebec - Ticker: KTR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Resource group id: resource:f432e9fd0800a47ecb73 - Deposit or zone: Roger deposit #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 10900000 - Grade: 0.8 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 0.45 - Cutoff Unit: g/t Aueq #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2018-10-09T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2025-08-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Silver grade component of a historical indicated resource. Evidence · text > 0.80 g/t of silver #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 6.8 years before this release ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/clarification-historical-mineral-resource-estimate-at-roger-project--42dcee53-9963-4f8a-9824-56b7701b59f1#fact-resource-facts-2) Roger Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Roger Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_qc - Reported Region: Quebec - Ticker: KTR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Resource group id: resource:f432e9fd0800a47ecb73 - Deposit or zone: Roger deposit #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 10900000 - Grade: 0.06 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.45 - Cutoff Unit: g/t Aueq #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2018-10-09T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2025-08-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Copper grade component of a historical indicated resource. Evidence · text > 0.06% of copper #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 6.8 years before this release ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/clarification-historical-mineral-resource-estimate-at-roger-project--42dcee53-9963-4f8a-9824-56b7701b59f1#fact-resource-facts-3) Roger Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Roger Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_qc - Reported Region: Quebec - Ticker: KTR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Resource group id: resource:611cb56374cca05c397d - Deposit or zone: Roger deposit #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 6569000 - Grade: 0.75 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 202000 - Contained Unit: oz - Cutoff Grade: 0.45 - Cutoff Unit: g/t Aueq #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2018-10-09T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2025-08-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Inferred resource component of a historical estimate. - Negative factor: Inferred category Evidence · text > the Inferred Resource can be estimated at 6,569,000 metric tonnes at a grade of 0.75 g/t of gold #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 6.8 years before this release ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/clarification-historical-mineral-resource-estimate-at-roger-project--42dcee53-9963-4f8a-9824-56b7701b59f1#fact-resource-facts-4) Roger Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Roger Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_qc - Reported Region: Quebec - Ticker: KTR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Resource group id: resource:611cb56374cca05c397d - Deposit or zone: Roger deposit #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 6569000 - Grade: 1.18 - Grade Unit: g/t - Cutoff Grade: 0.45 - Cutoff Unit: g/t Aueq #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2018-10-09T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2025-08-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Silver grade component of a historical inferred resource. Evidence · text > 1.18 g/t of silver #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 6.8 years before this release ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/clarification-historical-mineral-resource-estimate-at-roger-project--42dcee53-9963-4f8a-9824-56b7701b59f1#fact-resource-facts-5) Roger Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Roger Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_qc - Reported Region: Quebec - Ticker: KTR #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Resource group id: resource:611cb56374cca05c397d - Deposit or zone: Roger deposit #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 6569000 - Grade: 0.11 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 0.45 - Cutoff Unit: g/t Aueq #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2018-10-09T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2025-08-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Copper grade component of a historical inferred resource. Evidence · text > 0.11% of copper #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 6.8 years before this release ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.