# CleanTech Commences Campbell-Crotser Fluorspar Mine Permitting at Prominent Kentucky Fluorspar District

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/cleantech-commences-campbell-crotser-fluorspar-mine-permitting-at-prominent-kent--42721943-b4ee-4e52-b889-c1270ea856b5

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/CTV/news/5029738151882282/cleantech-commences-campbell-crotser-fluorspar-mine-permitting-at-prominent-kent

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2026-06-16T12:00:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: CleanTech Vanadium Mining Corp.

- Ticker: CTV

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Kentucky

- Primary commodity: Fluorspar

- Secondary commodities: Zinc, Lead

- Document categories: Resource update, Permitting

- Extracted: 2026-09-15 18:44:48 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.20 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

CleanTech has engaged a permitting specialist to begin the application process for the Campbell-Crotser underground fluorspar mine and flotation plant in Kentucky. The announcement also includes a restatement of a 1974 historical mineral resource estimate, which the company explicitly warns is non-compliant with modern CIM standards and should not be relied upon.

Reasoning: The company is advancing the permitting stage for a fluorspar project, supported by historical resource data that is noted as unreliable and non-compliant with current standards.

- Positive factor: Initiation of permitting process for Campbell-Crotser project

- Positive factor: Engagement of specialized permitting expert

- Positive factor: Presence of significant historical fluorspar mineralization

- Negative factor: Historical resource estimate is non-compliant with modern standards

- Negative factor: Lack of documented estimation methodology or QA/QC for historical data

- Negative factor: Resource categories predate current CIM standards

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 6

## Classification and evidence

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The historical estimate includes an Inferred category which the company notes is not defined by current CIM standards.

Evidence · text

> Inferred 160,724 35.97 3.75 1.25

**Historical Estimate Only**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.

Why it applies: The resource estimate is from a 1974 report and does not comply with current NI 43-101 or CIM standards.

Evidence · text

> A historic \(non-43-101 compliant\) mineral resource estimate performed by Boyce Moodie III in 1974

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Story-specific tag

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: The company explicitly states the historical estimate lacks documented QA/QC protocols.

Evidence · text

> absence of QA/QC protocols

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 6. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (6)

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/cleantech-commences-campbell-crotser-fluorspar-mine-permitting-at-prominent-kent--42721943-b4ee-4e52-b889-c1270ea856b5#fact-resource-facts-0)

Campbell-Crotser Fluorspar Project · fluorspar

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Campbell-Crotser Fluorspar Project
- Commodity: fluorspar
- Region: kentucky
- Reported Region: Kentucky
- Ticker: CTV

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Resource group id: resource:54c51e06acbdc02c85c1
- Deposit or zone: Campbell-Crotser

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 645117
- Grade: 37.38
- Grade Unit: %CaF2

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1974-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated category from a 1974 estimate that the company states is unreliable.

- Negative factor: Historical data lacks QA/QC and modern CIM compliance

Evidence · table

> 37.38

Context: 645,117

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 52.5 years before this release

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/cleantech-commences-campbell-crotser-fluorspar-mine-permitting-at-prominent-kent--42721943-b4ee-4e52-b889-c1270ea856b5#fact-resource-facts-1)

Campbell-Crotser Fluorspar Project · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Campbell-Crotser Fluorspar Project
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: kentucky
- Reported Region: Kentucky
- Ticker: CTV

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Resource group id: resource:54c51e06acbdc02c85c1
- Deposit or zone: Campbell-Crotser

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 645117
- Grade: 3.1
- Grade Unit: %

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1974-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Byproduct grade from a non-compliant historical estimate.

- Negative factor: Historical data lacks QA/QC and modern CIM compliance

Evidence · table

> 3.10

Context: 645,117

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 52.5 years before this release

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/cleantech-commences-campbell-crotser-fluorspar-mine-permitting-at-prominent-kent--42721943-b4ee-4e52-b889-c1270ea856b5#fact-resource-facts-2)

Campbell-Crotser Fluorspar Project · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Campbell-Crotser Fluorspar Project
- Commodity: lead
- Region: kentucky
- Reported Region: Kentucky
- Ticker: CTV

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Resource group id: resource:54c51e06acbdc02c85c1
- Deposit or zone: Campbell-Crotser

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 645117
- Grade: 0.92
- Grade Unit: %

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1974-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Byproduct grade from a non-compliant historical estimate.

- Negative factor: Historical data lacks QA/QC and modern CIM compliance

Evidence · table

> 0.92

Context: 645,117

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 52.5 years before this release

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/cleantech-commences-campbell-crotser-fluorspar-mine-permitting-at-prominent-kent--42721943-b4ee-4e52-b889-c1270ea856b5#fact-resource-facts-3)

Campbell-Crotser Fluorspar Project · fluorspar

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Campbell-Crotser Fluorspar Project
- Commodity: fluorspar
- Region: kentucky
- Reported Region: Kentucky
- Ticker: CTV

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Resource group id: resource:546c857879fdc7aa3f8c
- Deposit or zone: Campbell-Crotser

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 160724
- Grade: 35.97
- Grade Unit: %CaF2

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1974-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred category from a 1974 estimate that the company states is unreliable.

- Negative factor: Historical data lacks QA/QC and modern CIM compliance

Evidence · table

> 35.97

Context: 160,724

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 52.5 years before this release

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/cleantech-commences-campbell-crotser-fluorspar-mine-permitting-at-prominent-kent--42721943-b4ee-4e52-b889-c1270ea856b5#fact-resource-facts-4)

Campbell-Crotser Fluorspar Project · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Campbell-Crotser Fluorspar Project
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: kentucky
- Reported Region: Kentucky
- Ticker: CTV

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Resource group id: resource:546c857879fdc7aa3f8c
- Deposit or zone: Campbell-Crotser

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 160724
- Grade: 3.75
- Grade Unit: %

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1974-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Byproduct grade from a non-compliant historical estimate.

- Negative factor: Historical data lacks QA/QC and modern CIM compliance

Evidence · table

> 3.75

Context: 160,724

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 52.5 years before this release

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/cleantech-commences-campbell-crotser-fluorspar-mine-permitting-at-prominent-kent--42721943-b4ee-4e52-b889-c1270ea856b5#fact-resource-facts-5)

Campbell-Crotser Fluorspar Project · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Campbell-Crotser Fluorspar Project
- Commodity: lead
- Region: kentucky
- Reported Region: Kentucky
- Ticker: CTV

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Resource group id: resource:546c857879fdc7aa3f8c
- Deposit or zone: Campbell-Crotser

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 160724
- Grade: 1.25
- Grade Unit: %

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1974-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Byproduct grade from a non-compliant historical estimate.

- Negative factor: Historical data lacks QA/QC and modern CIM compliance

Evidence · table

> 1.25

Context: 160,724

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 52.5 years before this release

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
