Copper Fox Intersects Porphyry Copper System at Mineral Mountain
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Copper Fox Metals Inc.
- Ticker
- CUU
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Arizona
- Primary commodity
- Copper
- Secondary commodities
- Molybdenum, Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-15 18:58:12 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Copper Fox Metals Inc. reported drill results from MM-01-2025 at the Mineral Mountain project, intersecting a porphyry copper system. The hole returned several intervals of copper, molybdenum, and silver enrichment, including a high-grade quartz-copper-bornite-molybdenite vein.
Reasoning: Drillhole MM-01-2025 successfully intersected the shoulder of a porphyry copper system with multiple metal enrichment intervals, though absolute grades remain in the ppm range.
Positive factors
- Intersection of porphyry copper system
- Multiple metal assemblages (Cu-Mo-Ag)
- High-temperature indicator minerals present
- QA/QC protocols disclosed
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed
- Grades in ppm rather than % (low absolute grade)
Facts used in scoring: 32
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release mentions 396 core samples, 17 CRM standards, 34 blanks, and 7 split-core duplicates, with analysis by an ISO 17025 accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc. (Accreditation 2953.01 and Standard ISO/IEC 17025:2017)”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states 'True thickness/widths of the mineralization are unknown.'
Evidence · text
“True thickness/widths of the mineralization are unknown.”
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: The project is positioned near the giant Resolution porphyry copper-molybdenum deposit.
Evidence · text
“approximately 25km southwest of Rio Tinto and BHP's giant Resolution porphyry copper-molybdenum deposit”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 32. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (32)
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · copperGrade: 481Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 481
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 20 m
- To
- 26 m
- Intercept Depth
- 20 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:20-26
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate copper enrichment in a porphyry context.
Evidence · table
“481”
Context: 6.00
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · molybdenumGrade: 34Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 34
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 20 m
- To
- 26 m
- Intercept Depth
- 20 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:20-26
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace molybdenum enrichment.
Evidence · table
“34.0”
Context: 6.00
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · silverGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.52
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 20 m
- To
- 26 m
- Intercept Depth
- 20 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:20-26
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Negligible silver content.
Evidence · table
“0.52”
Context: 6.00
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · copperGrade: 2840Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2840
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 399 m
- To
- 400 m
- Intercept Depth
- 399 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:399-400
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High grade copper vein (0.28%) in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- High grade vein
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“2840”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · molybdenumGrade: 446Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 446
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 399 m
- To
- 400 m
- Intercept Depth
- 399 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:399-400
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Significant molybdenum enrichment in vein.
Positive factors
- High molybdenum grade
Evidence · table
“446.0”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · silverGrade: 2.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 399 m
- To
- 400 m
- Intercept Depth
- 399 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:399-400
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace silver enrichment.
Evidence · table
“2.60”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · copperGrade: 654Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 654
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 61 m
- To
- 68 m
- Intercept Depth
- 61 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:61-68
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 654 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“654”
Context: Table-1: Weighed average metal concentra
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · molybdenumGrade: 8.2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 61 m
- To
- 68 m
- Intercept Depth
- 61 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:61-68
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 8.2 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“8.2”
Context: Table-1: Weighed average metal concentra
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · silverGrade: 2.06Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.06
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 61 m
- To
- 68 m
- Intercept Depth
- 61 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:61-68
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2.06 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“2.06”
Context: Table-1: Weighed average metal concentra
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · copperGrade: 553Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 553
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 113 m
- To
- 118 m
- Intercept Depth
- 113 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:113-118
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 553 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“553”
Context: Table-1: Weighed average metal concentra
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · molybdenumGrade: 204.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 204.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 113 m
- To
- 118 m
- Intercept Depth
- 113 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:113-118
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 204.6 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“204.6”
Context: Table-1: Weighed average metal concentra
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · silverGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 113 m
- To
- 118 m
- Intercept Depth
- 113 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:113-118
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.3 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“1.30”
Context: Table-1: Weighed average metal concentra
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · copperGrade: 1179Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 1179
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 124 m
- To
- 125 m
- Intercept Depth
- 124 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:124-125
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1179 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“1179”
Context: Table-1: Weighed average metal concentra
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · molybdenumGrade: 100Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 100
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 124 m
- To
- 125 m
- Intercept Depth
- 124 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:124-125
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 100 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“100.0”
Context: Table-1: Weighed average metal concentra
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · silverGrade: 4.2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 124 m
- To
- 125 m
- Intercept Depth
- 124 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:124-125
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4.2 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“4.20”
Context: Table-1: Weighed average metal concentra
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · copperGrade: 1765Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 1765
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 130 m
- To
- 131 m
- Intercept Depth
- 130 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:130-131
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1765 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“1765”
Context: Table-1: Weighed average metal concentra
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · molybdenumGrade: 30.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 30.7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 130 m
- To
- 131 m
- Intercept Depth
- 130 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:130-131
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 30.7 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“30.7”
Context: Table-1: Weighed average metal concentra
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · silverGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 130 m
- To
- 131 m
- Intercept Depth
- 130 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:130-131
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.1 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“1.10”
Context: Table-1: Weighed average metal concentra
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · copperGrade: 435Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 11 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 435
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 200 m
- To
- 211 m
- Intercept Depth
- 200 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:200-211
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 435 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“435”
Context: Table-1: Weighed average metal concentra
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · molybdenumGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 11 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 200 m
- To
- 211 m
- Intercept Depth
- 200 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:200-211
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4.5 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“4.5”
Context: Table-1: Weighed average metal concentra
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · silverGrade: 1.48Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 11 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.48
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 200 m
- To
- 211 m
- Intercept Depth
- 200 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:200-211
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.48 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“1.48”
Context: Table-1: Weighed average metal concentra
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · copperGrade: 526Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 526
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 283 m
- To
- 293 m
- Intercept Depth
- 283 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:283-293
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 526 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“526”
Context: Table-1: Weighed average metal concentra
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · molybdenumGrade: 64.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 64.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 283 m
- To
- 293 m
- Intercept Depth
- 283 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:283-293
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 64.3 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“64.3”
Context: Table-1: Weighed average metal concentra
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · silverGrade: 0.71Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.71
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 283 m
- To
- 293 m
- Intercept Depth
- 283 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:283-293
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.71 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.71”
Context: Table-1: Weighed average metal concentra
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · copperGrade: 1065Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 1065
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 479 m
- To
- 480 m
- Intercept Depth
- 479 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:479-480
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1065 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“1065”
Context: Table-1: Weighed average metal concentra
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · molybdenumGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 479 m
- To
- 480 m
- Intercept Depth
- 479 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:479-480
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2.1 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: Table-1: Weighed average metal concentra
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · silverGrade: 18.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 479 m
- To
- 480 m
- Intercept Depth
- 479 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:479-480
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 18.3 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“18.30”
Context: Table-1: Weighed average metal concentra
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · copperGrade: 1430Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 1430
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 591 m
- To
- 593 m
- Intercept Depth
- 591 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:591-593
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1430 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“1430”
Context: Table-1: Weighed average metal concentra
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · silverGrade: 7.25Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.25
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 591 m
- To
- 593 m
- Intercept Depth
- 591 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:591-593
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 7.25 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“7.25”
Context: Table-1: Weighed average metal concentra
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · copperGrade: 613Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 13 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 613
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 13 m
- From
- 622 m
- To
- 635 m
- Intercept Depth
- 622 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:622-635
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 613 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“613”
Context: Table-1: Weighed average metal concentra
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · molybdenumGrade: 7.2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 13 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 13 m
- From
- 622 m
- To
- 635 m
- Intercept Depth
- 622 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:622-635
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 7.2 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“7.2”
Context: Table-1: Weighed average metal concentra
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MM-01-2025Mineral Mountain · silverGrade: 2.03Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 13 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MM-01-2025
- Project
- Mineral Mountain
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- CUU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.03
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 13 m
- From
- 622 m
- To
- 635 m
- Intercept Depth
- 622 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MM-01-2025:622-635
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Assayers and Laboratories Inc.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2.03 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“2.03”
Context: Table-1: Weighed average metal concentra
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.