CopperCorp Adds Second Drill Rig at Razorback - Commences Phase 2 Drilling at Jukes Prospect
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- CopperCorp Resources Inc.
- Ticker
- CPER
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Primary commodity
- Copper
- Secondary commodities
- Gold
- Document categories
- Drill results, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-09-13 19:19:12 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
CopperCorp has commenced Phase 2 diamond drilling at the Jukes Cu-Au prospect on its Razorback property in Tasmania, adding a second drill rig to accelerate exploration. The program targets strike extensions of the mineralization confirmed during Phase 1, supported by recent pole-dipole IP survey results.
Reasoning: The company is accelerating exploration at Jukes with a second rig, targeting extensions of a confirmed Cu-Au system, though new assay results are not yet provided in this release.
Positive factors
- Commencement of Phase 2 drilling to test strike extensions
- Mobilization of a second drill rig indicating increased activity
- Strong historical and recent IP survey correlation
- Proximity to tier-one Mt Lyell mine camp
Negative factors
- Phase 2 results are still pending
Facts used in scoring: 20
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 20. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (20)
JDD002W1Razorback · copperGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: %Intercept: 20 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Razorback
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.76
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 498 m
- To
- 518 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:498-518
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical intercept from Phase 1 drilling.
Positive factors
- Strong grade for an exploration target
Evidence · text
“20.0m @ 0.76% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD002W1Razorback · goldGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Razorback
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 498 m
- To
- 518 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:498-518
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold grade from Phase 1.
Evidence · text
“0.17g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD002W1Razorback · copperGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Razorback
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.86
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 19 m
- From
- 529 m
- To
- 548 m
- Intercept Depth
- 529 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:529-548
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical high-grade sub-interval from Phase 1.
Positive factors
- Higher grade sub-interval
Evidence · text
“19.0m @ 0.86% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD002W1Razorback · goldGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Razorback
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19 m
- From
- 529 m
- To
- 548 m
- Intercept Depth
- 529 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:529-548
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold grade from Phase 1.
Evidence · text
“0.48g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD002W1Razorback · copperGrade: 0.66Grade Unit: %Intercept: 50 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Razorback
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.66
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 50 m
- From
- 498 m
- To
- 548 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:498-548
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Broad historical intercept from Phase 1.
Positive factors
- Significant width
Evidence · text
“50.0m @ 0.66% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD002W1Razorback · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Razorback
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 50 m
- From
- 498 m
- To
- 548 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:498-548
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Broad historical gold grade from Phase 1.
Evidence · text
“0.27g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD002W1Razorback · copperGrade: 4.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.05 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Razorback
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.05 m
- From
- 545.4 m
- To
- 547.45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 545.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:545.4-547.45
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade sub-interval from Phase 1.
Positive factors
- High grade intercept
Evidence · text
“2.05m @ 4.2% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD002W1Razorback · goldGrade: 1.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.05 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Razorback
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.05 m
- From
- 545.4 m
- To
- 547.45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 545.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:545.4-547.45
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade sub-interval from Phase 1.
Positive factors
- High grade sub-interval
Evidence · text
“1.66g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD001Razorback · copperGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 132 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Razorback
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 132 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 204 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:72-204
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Broad historical intercept from Phase 1.
Positive factors
- Large width
Evidence · text
“132.0m @ 0.35% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD001Razorback · goldGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 132 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Razorback
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 132 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 204 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:72-204
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold grade from Phase 1.
Evidence · text
“0.19g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD001Razorback · copperGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Razorback
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.75
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 25 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 97 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:72-97
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade sub-interval from Phase 1.
Positive factors
- Strong sub-interval
Evidence · text
“25.0m @ 0.75% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD001Razorback · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Razorback
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 25 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 97 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:72-97
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold grade from Phase 1.
Evidence · text
“0.4g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD001Razorback · copperGrade: 0.94Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Razorback
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.94
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.1 m
- From
- 128.5 m
- To
- 138.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 128.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:128.5-138.6
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade sub-interval from Phase 1.
Positive factors
- Strong grade
Evidence · text
“10.1m @ 0.94% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD001Razorback · goldGrade: 0.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Razorback
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.69
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.1 m
- From
- 128.5 m
- To
- 138.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 128.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:128.5-138.6
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold grade from Phase 1.
Evidence · text
“0.69g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD001Razorback · copperGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Razorback
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.67
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 194 m
- To
- 204 m
- Intercept Depth
- 194 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:194-204
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical intercept from Phase 1.
Evidence · text
“10.0m @ 0.67% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD001Razorback · goldGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Razorback
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 194 m
- To
- 204 m
- Intercept Depth
- 194 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:194-204
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold grade from Phase 1.
Evidence · text
“0.29g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
King Jukes No. 1Razorback · copperGrade: 1.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- King Jukes No. 1
- Project
- Razorback
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.34
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 18 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical channel sampling from 1980s.
Positive factors
- High grade zone
Evidence · text
“18.0m @ 1.34% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
King Jukes No. 1Razorback · goldGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- King Jukes No. 1
- Project
- Razorback
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold grade from 1980s channel sampling.
Evidence · text
“1.09g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Jukes No.3 Main AditRazorback · copperGrade: 2.92Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Jukes No.3 Main Adit
- Project
- Razorback
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.92
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical channel sampling.
Positive factors
- Very high grade
Evidence · text
“9.0m @ 2.92% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Jukes No.3 Main AditRazorback · goldGrade: 1.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Jukes No.3 Main Adit
- Project
- Razorback
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.79
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold grade from channel sampling.
Evidence · text
“1.79g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.