CopperCorp Delivers Additional High-Grade Copper Intercepts at Jukes, including 13m @ 2.01% CuEq

Original announcement by tmx on Mar 10, 2026

Bullish

Company: CopperCorp Resources Inc.
Ticker: CPER
Exchange: TSX
Region: western Tasmania, Australia
Primary commodity: Copper
Secondary commodities: Gold, Silver
Document categories: Drill results
Extracted: 2026-09-13 19:04:00 UTC

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

CopperCorp Resources Inc. announced additional high-grade copper intercepts from its Phase 2 drilling program at the Jukes prospect in western Tasmania, Australia. Highlights include 13.0m @ 2.01% CuEq from 205.0m in hole JDD007, which contained a bonanza intercept of 1.0m @ 14.91% CuEq. The company reported both broad near-surface mineralization and deeper, high-grade lodes, confirming and extending the Cu-Au-Ag mineralization over a significant strike length and depth.

Reasoning: CopperCorp's Phase 2 drilling at Jukes delivered strong, high-grade copper-gold-silver intercepts, including bonanza grades, extending mineralization both near-surface and at depth. The results are highly encouraging for the project's potential, despite the lack of true width determination and project-specific metallurgical testwork.

Positive factors

High-grade copper-gold-silver intercepts, including bonanza grades, confirm and extend mineralization at Jukes.
Broad zones of near-surface mineralization and deeper high-grade lodes support a robust mineralized system.
QA/QC procedures are disclosed, and a Qualified Person has approved the technical information.
Metal equivalent assumptions are transparently disclosed, allowing for proper evaluation.
The project shows IOCG affinities, similar to the nearby Mt Lyell deposit, indicating significant potential.

Negative factors

True width of mineralization is not yet determined, which may overstate apparent intercept lengths.
No metallurgical test work has been completed on Jukes mineralization, so recovery assumptions are based on a nearby historical operation.

Facts used in scoring: 144

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 144. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (144)

JDD007Jukes · copperGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 56 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD007
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.42
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 56 m
From: 66 m
To: 122 m
Hole Depth: 287.5 m
Intercept Depth: 66 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD007:66-122
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383675
Northing: 5331180
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 276 °
Dip: -55 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 0.5
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This broad intercept in JDD007 contributes to the overall understanding of the near-surface mineralization at Jukes, showing moderate copper grades over a significant width.

Positive factors

Broad intercept length indicates significant mineralization.
Part of a new phase of drilling, contributing to understanding the deposit.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.42”

Context: 56.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD007Jukes · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 56 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD007
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.1
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 56 m
From: 66 m
To: 122 m
Hole Depth: 287.5 m
Intercept Depth: 66 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD007:66-122
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383675
Northing: 5331180
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 276 °
Dip: -55 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade in this broad intercept is modest but contributes to the overall polymetallic nature of the mineralization.

Positive factors

Gold is present as a secondary commodity over a significant width.

Negative factors

Gold grade is relatively low for this intercept length.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 56.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD007Jukes · silverGrade: 1.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 56 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD007
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 1.58
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 56 m
From: 66 m
To: 122 m
Hole Depth: 287.5 m
Intercept Depth: 66 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD007:66-122
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383675
Northing: 5331180
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 276 °
Dip: -55 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade in this broad intercept is modest but contributes to the overall polymetallic nature of the mineralization.

Positive factors

Silver is present as a secondary commodity over a significant width.

Negative factors

Silver grade is relatively low for this intercept length.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“1.58”

Context: 56.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD007Jukes · copperGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: %Intercept: 36 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD007
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.54
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 36 m
From: 66 m
To: 102 m
Hole Depth: 287.5 m
Intercept Depth: 66 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD007:66-102
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383675
Northing: 5331180
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 276 °
Dip: -55 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 0.64
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval within JDD007 shows a strong copper grade over a substantial width, enhancing the overall prospectivity of the near-surface mineralization.

Positive factors

Good copper grade over a significant width, indicating a strong mineralized zone.
Part of a new phase of drilling, contributing to understanding the deposit.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.54”

Context: 36.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD007Jukes · goldGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD007
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.13
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 36 m
From: 66 m
To: 102 m
Hole Depth: 287.5 m
Intercept Depth: 66 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD007:66-102
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383675
Northing: 5331180
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 276 °
Dip: -55 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade in this sub-interval is modest but contributes to the overall polymetallic nature of the mineralization.

Positive factors

Gold is present as a secondary commodity over a significant width.

Negative factors

Gold grade is relatively low for this intercept length.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.13”

Context: 36.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD007Jukes · silverGrade: 1.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD007
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 1.84
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 36 m
From: 66 m
To: 102 m
Hole Depth: 287.5 m
Intercept Depth: 66 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD007:66-102
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383675
Northing: 5331180
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 276 °
Dip: -55 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade in this sub-interval is modest but contributes to the overall polymetallic nature of the mineralization.

Positive factors

Silver is present as a secondary commodity over a significant width.

Negative factors

Silver grade is relatively low for this intercept length.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“1.84”

Context: 36.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD007Jukes · copperGrade: 0.77Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD007
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.77
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 12 m
From: 69 m
To: 81 m
Hole Depth: 287.5 m
Intercept Depth: 66 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD007:69-81
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383675
Northing: 5331180
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 276 °
Dip: -55 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 0.92
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This higher-grade sub-interval within JDD007 further enhances the prospectivity of the near-surface mineralization.

Positive factors

Good copper grade over a moderate width, indicating a strong mineralized zone.
Part of a new phase of drilling, contributing to understanding the deposit.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.77”

Context: 12.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD007Jukes · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD007
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.2
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 12 m
From: 69 m
To: 81 m
Hole Depth: 287.5 m
Intercept Depth: 66 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD007:69-81
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383675
Northing: 5331180
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 276 °
Dip: -55 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade in this sub-interval is modest but contributes to the overall polymetallic nature of the mineralization.

Positive factors

Gold is present as a secondary commodity over a moderate width.

Negative factors

Gold grade is relatively low for this intercept length.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.20”

Context: 12.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD007Jukes · silverGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD007
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 1.18
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 12 m
From: 69 m
To: 81 m
Hole Depth: 287.5 m
Intercept Depth: 66 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD007:69-81
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383675
Northing: 5331180
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 276 °
Dip: -55 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade in this sub-interval is modest but contributes to the overall polymetallic nature of the mineralization.

Positive factors

Silver is present as a secondary commodity over a moderate width.

Negative factors

Silver grade is relatively low for this intercept length.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“1.18”

Context: 12.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD007Jukes · copperGrade: 0.98Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD007
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.98
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 4 m
From: 89 m
To: 93 m
Hole Depth: 287.5 m
Intercept Depth: 66 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD007:89-93
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383675
Northing: 5331180
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 276 °
Dip: -55 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.13
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This higher-grade sub-interval within JDD007 further enhances the prospectivity of the near-surface mineralization.

Positive factors

Good copper grade over a narrow but significant width.
Part of a new phase of drilling, contributing to understanding the deposit.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.98”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD007Jukes · goldGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD007
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.17
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 4 m
From: 89 m
To: 93 m
Hole Depth: 287.5 m
Intercept Depth: 66 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD007:89-93
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383675
Northing: 5331180
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 276 °
Dip: -55 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade in this sub-interval is modest but contributes to the overall polymetallic nature of the mineralization.

Positive factors

Gold is present as a secondary commodity over a narrow but significant width.

Negative factors

Gold grade is relatively low for this intercept length.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.17”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD007Jukes · silverGrade: 5.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD007
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 5.1
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 4 m
From: 89 m
To: 93 m
Hole Depth: 287.5 m
Intercept Depth: 66 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD007:89-93
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383675
Northing: 5331180
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 276 °
Dip: -55 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade in this sub-interval is modest but contributes to the overall polymetallic nature of the mineralization.

Positive factors

Silver is present as a secondary commodity over a narrow but significant width.

Negative factors

Silver grade is relatively low for this intercept length.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“5.10”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD007Jukes · copperGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD007
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 1.18
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 13 m
From: 205 m
To: 218 m
Hole Depth: 287.5 m
Intercept Depth: 66 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD007:205-218
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383675
Northing: 5331180
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 276 °
Dip: -55 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 2.01
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade copper intercept in JDD007 is a significant result, demonstrating strong mineralization at depth and supporting the emerging high-grade lode model.

Positive factors

High-grade copper intercept over a significant width, indicating a strong mineralized zone.
Part of a new phase of drilling, contributing to understanding the deposit.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“1.18”

Context: 13.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD007Jukes · goldGrade: 1.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD007
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 1.14
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 13 m
From: 205 m
To: 218 m
Hole Depth: 287.5 m
Intercept Depth: 66 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD007:205-218
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383675
Northing: 5331180
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 276 °
Dip: -55 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade in this intercept is strong and adds significant value to the overall mineralization.

Positive factors

Good gold grade over a significant width, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“1.14”

Context: 13.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD007Jukes · silverGrade: 3.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD007
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 3.93
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 13 m
From: 205 m
To: 218 m
Hole Depth: 287.5 m
Intercept Depth: 66 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD007:205-218
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383675
Northing: 5331180
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 276 °
Dip: -55 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade in this intercept is moderate and adds to the overall polymetallic value of the mineralization.

Positive factors

Silver is present as a secondary commodity over a significant width, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“3.93”

Context: 13.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD007Jukes · copperGrade: 6.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD007
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 6.28
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 1 m
From: 206 m
To: 207 m
Hole Depth: 287.5 m
Intercept Depth: 66 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD007:206-207
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383675
Northing: 5331180
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 276 °
Dip: -55 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 14.91
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza copper intercept in JDD007 is a highly significant result, demonstrating very high-grade mineralization at depth and supporting the emerging high-grade lode model.

Positive factors

Exceptional copper grade over a narrow but very high-grade interval, indicating bonanza mineralization.
Part of a new phase of drilling, contributing to understanding the deposit.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“6.28”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD007Jukes · goldGrade: 12.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD007
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 12.2
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 1 m
From: 206 m
To: 207 m
Hole Depth: 287.5 m
Intercept Depth: 66 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD007:206-207
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383675
Northing: 5331180
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 276 °
Dip: -55 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza gold intercept in JDD007 is a highly significant result, demonstrating very high-grade mineralization at depth and supporting the emerging high-grade lode model.

Positive factors

Exceptional gold grade over a narrow but very high-grade interval, indicating bonanza mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“12.2”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD007Jukes · silverGrade: 9.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD007
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 9.27
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 1 m
From: 206 m
To: 207 m
Hole Depth: 287.5 m
Intercept Depth: 66 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD007:206-207
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383675
Northing: 5331180
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 276 °
Dip: -55 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high silver grade in JDD007 is a significant result, adding to the overall polymetallic value of the bonanza intercept.

Positive factors

High silver grade over a narrow but very high-grade interval, contributing to the bonanza mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“9.27”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD007Jukes · copperGrade: 5.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.15 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD007
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 5.34
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 1.15 m
From: 213.85 m
To: 215 m
Hole Depth: 287.5 m
Intercept Depth: 66 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD007:213.85-215
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383675
Northing: 5331180
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 276 °
Dip: -55 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 6.72
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza copper intercept in JDD007 is a highly significant result, demonstrating very high-grade mineralization at depth and supporting the emerging high-grade lode model.

Positive factors

Exceptional copper grade over a narrow but very high-grade interval, indicating bonanza mineralization.
Part of a new phase of drilling, contributing to understanding the deposit.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“5.34”

Context: 1.15

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD007Jukes · goldGrade: 1.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD007
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 1.72
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 1.15 m
From: 213.85 m
To: 215 m
Hole Depth: 287.5 m
Intercept Depth: 66 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD007:213.85-215
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383675
Northing: 5331180
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 276 °
Dip: -55 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high gold grade in JDD007 is a significant result, adding to the overall polymetallic value of the bonanza intercept.

Positive factors

High gold grade over a narrow but very high-grade interval, contributing to the bonanza mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“1.72”

Context: 1.15

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD007Jukes · silverGrade: 24.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD007
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 24.8
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 1.15 m
From: 213.85 m
To: 215 m
Hole Depth: 287.5 m
Intercept Depth: 66 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD007:213.85-215
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383675
Northing: 5331180
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 276 °
Dip: -55 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This good silver grade in JDD007 is a significant result, adding to the overall polymetallic value of the bonanza intercept.

Positive factors

Good silver grade over a narrow but very high-grade interval, contributing to the bonanza mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“24.8”

Context: 1.15

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD005Jukes · copperGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD005
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.31
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 6 m
From: 33 m
To: 39 m
Hole Depth: 332.8 m
Intercept Depth: 33 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD005:33-39
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383379
Northing: 5331441
Elevation: 545 m
Azimuth: 45 °
Dip: -65 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 0.39
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept in JDD005 confirms copper mineralization, adding to the overall prospectivity of the Jukes project.

Positive factors

Copper mineralization confirmed in a new hole, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit.

Negative factors

Grade is moderate over a narrow width.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD005Jukes · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD005
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.09
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 6 m
From: 33 m
To: 39 m
Hole Depth: 332.8 m
Intercept Depth: 33 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD005:33-39
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383379
Northing: 5331441
Elevation: 545 m
Azimuth: 45 °
Dip: -65 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade in this intercept is low but contributes to the overall polymetallic nature of the mineralization.

Positive factors

Gold is present as a secondary commodity.

Negative factors

Gold grade is low.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD005Jukes · silverGrade: 2.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD005
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 2.46
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 6 m
From: 33 m
To: 39 m
Hole Depth: 332.8 m
Intercept Depth: 33 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD005:33-39
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383379
Northing: 5331441
Elevation: 545 m
Azimuth: 45 °
Dip: -65 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade in this intercept is low but contributes to the overall polymetallic nature of the mineralization.

Positive factors

Silver is present as a secondary commodity.

Negative factors

Silver grade is low.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“2.46”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD005Jukes · copperGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD005
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.13
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 17 m
From: 73 m
To: 90 m
Hole Depth: 332.8 m
Intercept Depth: 33 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD005:73-90
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383379
Northing: 5331441
Elevation: 545 m
Azimuth: 45 °
Dip: -65 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 0.2
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept in JDD005 shows low-grade copper mineralization, which is less significant but still confirms the presence of the commodity.

Positive factors

Copper mineralization confirmed in a new hole, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit.

Negative factors

Low copper grade over a moderate width.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.13”

Context: 17.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD005Jukes · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD005
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.09
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 17 m
From: 73 m
To: 90 m
Hole Depth: 332.8 m
Intercept Depth: 33 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD005:73-90
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383379
Northing: 5331441
Elevation: 545 m
Azimuth: 45 °
Dip: -65 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade in this intercept is very low, contributing minimally to the overall value.

Positive factors

Gold is present as a secondary commodity.

Negative factors

Gold grade is very low.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Context: 17.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD005Jukes · silverGrade: 0.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD005
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.94
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 17 m
From: 73 m
To: 90 m
Hole Depth: 332.8 m
Intercept Depth: 33 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD005:73-90
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383379
Northing: 5331441
Elevation: 545 m
Azimuth: 45 °
Dip: -65 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade in this intercept is very low, contributing minimally to the overall value.

Positive factors

Silver is present as a secondary commodity.

Negative factors

Silver grade is very low.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.94”

Context: 17.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD006Jukes · copperGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 64 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD006
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.15
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 64 m
From: 14 m
To: 78 m
Hole Depth: 545.3 m
Intercept Depth: 14 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD006:14-78
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383484
Northing: 5331422
Elevation: 562 m
Azimuth: 82 °
Dip: -50 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 0.23
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 11 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This broad intercept in JDD006 shows low-grade copper mineralization, which is less significant but still confirms the presence of the commodity over a large interval.

Positive factors

Broad intercept length indicates significant mineralization, albeit low grade.
Part of a new phase of drilling, contributing to understanding the deposit.

Negative factors

Low copper grade over a broad width.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: 64.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD006Jukes · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 64 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD006
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.09
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 64 m
From: 14 m
To: 78 m
Hole Depth: 545.3 m
Intercept Depth: 14 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD006:14-78
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383484
Northing: 5331422
Elevation: 562 m
Azimuth: 82 °
Dip: -50 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 11 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade in this broad intercept is very low, contributing minimally to the overall value.

Positive factors

Gold is present as a secondary commodity.

Negative factors

Gold grade is very low.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Context: 64.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD006Jukes · silverGrade: 2.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 64 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD006
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 2.15
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 64 m
From: 14 m
To: 78 m
Hole Depth: 545.3 m
Intercept Depth: 14 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD006:14-78
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383484
Northing: 5331422
Elevation: 562 m
Azimuth: 82 °
Dip: -50 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 11 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade in this broad intercept is very low, contributing minimally to the overall value.

Positive factors

Silver is present as a secondary commodity.

Negative factors

Silver grade is very low.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“2.15”

Context: 64.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD006Jukes · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD006
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.2
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 15 m
From: 63 m
To: 78 m
Hole Depth: 545.3 m
Intercept Depth: 14 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD006:63-78
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383484
Northing: 5331422
Elevation: 562 m
Azimuth: 82 °
Dip: -50 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 0.28
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 11 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval in JDD006 shows low-grade copper mineralization, which is less significant but still confirms the presence of the commodity.

Positive factors

Copper mineralization confirmed over a moderate width.

Negative factors

Low copper grade.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.20”

Context: 15.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD006Jukes · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD006
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.1
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 15 m
From: 63 m
To: 78 m
Hole Depth: 545.3 m
Intercept Depth: 14 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD006:63-78
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383484
Northing: 5331422
Elevation: 562 m
Azimuth: 82 °
Dip: -50 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 11 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The gold grade in this sub-interval is very low, contributing minimally to the overall value.

Positive factors

Gold is present as a secondary commodity.

Negative factors

Gold grade is very low.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 15.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD006Jukes · silverGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD006
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 1.7
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 15 m
From: 63 m
To: 78 m
Hole Depth: 545.3 m
Intercept Depth: 14 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD006:63-78
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383484
Northing: 5331422
Elevation: 562 m
Azimuth: 82 °
Dip: -50 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 11 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The silver grade in this sub-interval is very low, contributing minimally to the overall value.

Positive factors

Silver is present as a secondary commodity.

Negative factors

Silver grade is very low.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“1.70”

Context: 15.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD001Jukes · copperGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 132 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD001
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.35
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 132 m
From: 72 m
To: 204 m
Hole Depth: 214 m
Intercept Depth: 72 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD001:72-204
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 258 °
Dip: -50 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 0.49
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical broad intercept in JDD001 established the presence of copper mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Broad intercept length indicates significant mineralization.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

Low copper grade over a broad width.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Context: 132.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD001Jukes · goldGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 132 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD001
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.19
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 132 m
From: 72 m
To: 204 m
Hole Depth: 214 m
Intercept Depth: 72 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD001:72-204
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 258 °
Dip: -50 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical broad intercept in JDD001 shows low-grade gold mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Gold is present as a secondary commodity over a significant width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

Low gold grade over a broad width.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: 132.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD001Jukes · silverGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 132 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD001
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 1.5
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 132 m
From: 72 m
To: 204 m
Hole Depth: 214 m
Intercept Depth: 72 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD001:72-204
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 258 °
Dip: -50 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical broad intercept in JDD001 shows low-grade silver mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Silver is present as a secondary commodity over a significant width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

Low silver grade over a broad width.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“1.50”

Context: 132.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD001Jukes · copperGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD001
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.75
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 25 m
From: 72 m
To: 97 m
Hole Depth: 214 m
Intercept Depth: 72 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD001:72-97
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 258 °
Dip: -50 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.04
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval in JDD001 shows good copper mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Good copper grade over a significant width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.75”

Context: 25.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD001Jukes · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD001
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.4
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 25 m
From: 72 m
To: 97 m
Hole Depth: 214 m
Intercept Depth: 72 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD001:72-97
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 258 °
Dip: -50 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval in JDD001 shows moderate gold mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Gold is present as a secondary commodity over a significant width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.4”

Context: 25.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD001Jukes · silverGrade: 1.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD001
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 1.62
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 25 m
From: 72 m
To: 97 m
Hole Depth: 214 m
Intercept Depth: 72 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD001:72-97
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 258 °
Dip: -50 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval in JDD001 shows moderate silver mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Silver is present as a secondary commodity over a significant width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“1.62”

Context: 25.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD001Jukes · copperGrade: 0.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD001
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.81
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 9 m
From: 85 m
To: 94 m
Hole Depth: 214 m
Intercept Depth: 72 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD001:85-94
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 258 °
Dip: -50 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.35
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval in JDD001 shows good copper mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Good copper grade over a moderate width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.81”

Context: 9.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD001Jukes · goldGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD001
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.76
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 9 m
From: 85 m
To: 94 m
Hole Depth: 214 m
Intercept Depth: 72 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD001:85-94
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 258 °
Dip: -50 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval in JDD001 shows good gold mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Good gold grade over a moderate width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.76”

Context: 9.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD001Jukes · silverGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD001
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 1.6
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 9 m
From: 85 m
To: 94 m
Hole Depth: 214 m
Intercept Depth: 72 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD001:85-94
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 258 °
Dip: -50 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval in JDD001 shows moderate silver mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Silver is present as a secondary commodity over a moderate width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“1.60”

Context: 9.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD001Jukes · copperGrade: 0.94Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD001
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.94
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 10.1 m
From: 128.5 m
To: 138.6 m
Hole Depth: 214 m
Intercept Depth: 72 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD001:128.5-138.6
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 258 °
Dip: -50 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.45
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval in JDD001 shows good copper mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Good copper grade over a moderate width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.94”

Context: 10.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD001Jukes · goldGrade: 0.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD001
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.69
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 10.1 m
From: 128.5 m
To: 138.6 m
Hole Depth: 214 m
Intercept Depth: 72 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD001:128.5-138.6
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 258 °
Dip: -50 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval in JDD001 shows good gold mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Good gold grade over a moderate width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.69”

Context: 10.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD001Jukes · silverGrade: 4.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD001
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 4.27
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 10.1 m
From: 128.5 m
To: 138.6 m
Hole Depth: 214 m
Intercept Depth: 72 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD001:128.5-138.6
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 258 °
Dip: -50 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval in JDD001 shows good silver mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Good silver grade over a moderate width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“4.27”

Context: 10.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD001Jukes · copperGrade: 2.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD001
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 2.17
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 3.1 m
From: 135.5 m
To: 138.6 m
Hole Depth: 214 m
Intercept Depth: 72 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD001:135.5-138.6
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 258 °
Dip: -50 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 3.71
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical high-grade copper intercept in JDD001 is a significant result, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

High-grade copper intercept over a narrow but significant width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“2.17”

Context: 3.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD001Jukes · goldGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD001
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 2.1
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 3.1 m
From: 135.5 m
To: 138.6 m
Hole Depth: 214 m
Intercept Depth: 72 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD001:135.5-138.6
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 258 °
Dip: -50 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical high-grade gold intercept in JDD001 is a significant result, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

High gold grade over a narrow but significant width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“2.1”

Context: 3.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD001Jukes · silverGrade: 9.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD001
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 9.25
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 3.1 m
From: 135.5 m
To: 138.6 m
Hole Depth: 214 m
Intercept Depth: 72 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD001:135.5-138.6
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 258 °
Dip: -50 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical good silver intercept in JDD001 is a significant result, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Good silver grade over a narrow but significant width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“9.25”

Context: 3.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD001Jukes · copperGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD001
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.67
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 10 m
From: 194 m
To: 204 m
Hole Depth: 214 m
Intercept Depth: 72 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD001:194-204
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 258 °
Dip: -50 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 0.9
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval in JDD001 shows good copper mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Good copper grade over a moderate width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.67”

Context: 10.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD001Jukes · goldGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD001
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.29
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 10 m
From: 194 m
To: 204 m
Hole Depth: 214 m
Intercept Depth: 72 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD001:194-204
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 258 °
Dip: -50 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval in JDD001 shows moderate gold mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Gold is present as a secondary commodity over a moderate width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.29”

Context: 10.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD001Jukes · silverGrade: 4.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD001
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 4.43
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 10 m
From: 194 m
To: 204 m
Hole Depth: 214 m
Intercept Depth: 72 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD001:194-204
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 258 °
Dip: -50 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval in JDD001 shows moderate silver mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Silver is present as a secondary commodity over a moderate width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“4.43”

Context: 10.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002Jukes · copperGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.18
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 14.8 m
From: 122.2 m
To: 137 m
Hole Depth: 310 m
Intercept Depth: 122.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002:122.2-137
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 0.19
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept in JDD002 shows low-grade copper mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

Low copper grade over a moderate width.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 14.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002Jukes · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.01
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 14.8 m
From: 122.2 m
To: 137 m
Hole Depth: 310 m
Intercept Depth: 122.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002:122.2-137
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept in JDD002 shows extremely low-grade gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall value and is not new information.

Positive factors

Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

Gold grade is extremely low.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 14.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002Jukes · silverGrade: 0.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.93
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 14.8 m
From: 122.2 m
To: 137 m
Hole Depth: 310 m
Intercept Depth: 122.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002:122.2-137
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept in JDD002 shows extremely low-grade silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall value and is not new information.

Positive factors

Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

Silver grade is extremely low.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.93”

Context: 14.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002W1Jukes · copperGrade: 0.66Grade Unit: %Intercept: 50 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002W1
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.66
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 50 m
From: 498 m
To: 548 m
Hole Depth: 530 m
Intercept Depth: 121 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002W1:498-548
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 0.87
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept in JDD002W1 shows good copper mineralization over a significant width, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Good copper grade over a significant width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.66”

Context: 50.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002W1Jukes · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002W1
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.27
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 50 m
From: 498 m
To: 548 m
Hole Depth: 530 m
Intercept Depth: 121 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002W1:498-548
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept in JDD002W1 shows moderate gold mineralization over a significant width, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Gold is present as a secondary commodity over a significant width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: 50.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002W1Jukes · silverGrade: 3.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002W1
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 3.57
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 50 m
From: 498 m
To: 548 m
Hole Depth: 530 m
Intercept Depth: 121 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002W1:498-548
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept in JDD002W1 shows moderate silver mineralization over a significant width, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Silver is present as a secondary commodity over a significant width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“3.57”

Context: 50.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002W1Jukes · copperGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: %Intercept: 20 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002W1
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.76
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 20 m
From: 498 m
To: 518 m
Hole Depth: 530 m
Intercept Depth: 121 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002W1:498-518
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 0.9
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval in JDD002W1 shows good copper mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Good copper grade over a significant width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.76”

Context: 20.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002W1Jukes · goldGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002W1
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.17
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 20 m
From: 498 m
To: 518 m
Hole Depth: 530 m
Intercept Depth: 121 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002W1:498-518
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval in JDD002W1 shows moderate gold mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Gold is present as a secondary commodity over a significant width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.17”

Context: 20.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002W1Jukes · silverGrade: 3.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002W1
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 3.32
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 20 m
From: 498 m
To: 518 m
Hole Depth: 530 m
Intercept Depth: 121 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002W1:498-518
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval in JDD002W1 shows moderate silver mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Silver is present as a secondary commodity over a significant width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“3.32”

Context: 20.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002W1Jukes · copperGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002W1
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.86
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 19 m
From: 529 m
To: 548 m
Hole Depth: 530 m
Intercept Depth: 121 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002W1:529-548
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.24
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval in JDD002W1 shows good copper mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Good copper grade over a significant width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.86”

Context: 19.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002W1Jukes · goldGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002W1
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.48
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 19 m
From: 529 m
To: 548 m
Hole Depth: 530 m
Intercept Depth: 121 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002W1:529-548
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval in JDD002W1 shows good gold mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Good gold grade over a significant width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.48”

Context: 19.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002W1Jukes · silverGrade: 5.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002W1
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 5.58
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 19 m
From: 529 m
To: 548 m
Hole Depth: 530 m
Intercept Depth: 121 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002W1:529-548
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval in JDD002W1 shows good silver mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Good silver grade over a significant width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“5.58”

Context: 19.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002W1Jukes · copperGrade: 4.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.05 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002W1
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 4.2
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 2.05 m
From: 545.4 m
To: 547.45 m
Hole Depth: 530 m
Intercept Depth: 121 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002W1:545.4-547.45
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 5.57
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical bonanza copper intercept in JDD002W1 is a highly significant result, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Exceptional copper grade over a narrow but very high-grade interval, indicating bonanza mineralization.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“4.20”

Context: 2.05

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002W1Jukes · goldGrade: 1.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.05 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002W1
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 1.66
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 2.05 m
From: 545.4 m
To: 547.45 m
Hole Depth: 530 m
Intercept Depth: 121 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002W1:545.4-547.45
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical high-grade gold intercept in JDD002W1 is a significant result, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

High gold grade over a narrow but very high-grade interval, contributing to the bonanza mineralization.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“1.66”

Context: 2.05

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002W1Jukes · silverGrade: 29.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.05 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002W1
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 29.16
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 2.05 m
From: 545.4 m
To: 547.45 m
Hole Depth: 530 m
Intercept Depth: 121 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002W1:545.4-547.45
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical good silver intercept in JDD002W1 is a significant result, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Good silver grade over a narrow but very high-grade interval, contributing to the bonanza mineralization.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“29.16”

Context: 2.05

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002W1Jukes · copperGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002W1
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.11
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 19 m
From: 121 m
To: 140 m
Hole Depth: 530 m
Intercept Depth: 121 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002W1:121-140
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 0.13
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept in JDD002W1 shows low-grade copper mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

Low copper grade over a moderate width.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: 19.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002W1Jukes · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002W1
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.02
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 19 m
From: 121 m
To: 140 m
Hole Depth: 530 m
Intercept Depth: 121 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002W1:121-140
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept in JDD002W1 shows extremely low-grade gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall value and is not new information.

Positive factors

Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

Gold grade is extremely low.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: 19.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002W1Jukes · silverGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002W1
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.49
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 19 m
From: 121 m
To: 140 m
Hole Depth: 530 m
Intercept Depth: 121 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002W1:121-140
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept in JDD002W1 shows extremely low-grade silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall value and is not new information.

Positive factors

Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

Silver grade is extremely low.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.49”

Context: 19.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002W1Jukes · copperGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002W1
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.17
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 6 m
From: 214 m
To: 220 m
Hole Depth: 530 m
Intercept Depth: 121 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002W1:214-220
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 0.22
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept in JDD002W1 shows low-grade copper mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

Low copper grade over a narrow width.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.17”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002W1Jukes · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002W1
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.06
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 6 m
From: 214 m
To: 220 m
Hole Depth: 530 m
Intercept Depth: 121 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002W1:214-220
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept in JDD002W1 shows very low-grade gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall value and is not new information.

Positive factors

Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

Gold grade is very low.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002W1Jukes · silverGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002W1
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.48
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 6 m
From: 214 m
To: 220 m
Hole Depth: 530 m
Intercept Depth: 121 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002W1:214-220
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept in JDD002W1 shows very low-grade silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall value and is not new information.

Positive factors

Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

Silver grade is very low.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.48”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002W1Jukes · copperGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002W1
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.17
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 24 m
From: 400 m
To: 424 m
Hole Depth: 530 m
Intercept Depth: 121 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002W1:400-424
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 0.23
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept in JDD002W1 shows low-grade copper mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

Low copper grade over a significant width.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.17”

Context: 24.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002W1Jukes · goldGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002W1
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.08
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 24 m
From: 400 m
To: 424 m
Hole Depth: 530 m
Intercept Depth: 121 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002W1:400-424
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept in JDD002W1 shows very low-grade gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall value and is not new information.

Positive factors

Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

Gold grade is very low.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.08”

Context: 24.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002W1Jukes · silverGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002W1
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 1.1
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 24 m
From: 400 m
To: 424 m
Hole Depth: 530 m
Intercept Depth: 121 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002W1:400-424
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept in JDD002W1 shows very low-grade silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall value and is not new information.

Positive factors

Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

Silver grade is very low.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“1.10”

Context: 24.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002W1Jukes · copperGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002W1
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.35
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 5 m
From: 463 m
To: 468 m
Hole Depth: 530 m
Intercept Depth: 121 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002W1:463-468
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 0.45
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept in JDD002W1 shows moderate copper mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

Moderate copper grade over a narrow width.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Context: 5.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002W1Jukes · goldGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002W1
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.08
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 5 m
From: 463 m
To: 468 m
Hole Depth: 530 m
Intercept Depth: 121 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002W1:463-468
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept in JDD002W1 shows very low-grade gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall value and is not new information.

Positive factors

Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

Gold grade is very low.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.08”

Context: 5.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002W1Jukes · silverGrade: 5.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002W1
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 5.64
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 5 m
From: 463 m
To: 468 m
Hole Depth: 530 m
Intercept Depth: 121 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002W1:463-468
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept in JDD002W1 shows very low-grade silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall value and is not new information.

Positive factors

Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

Silver grade is very low.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“5.64”

Context: 5.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002W1Jukes · copperGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002W1
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.34
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 3 m
From: 489 m
To: 492 m
Hole Depth: 530 m
Intercept Depth: 121 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002W1:489-492
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 0.41
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept in JDD002W1 shows moderate copper mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

Moderate copper grade over a narrow width.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.34”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002W1Jukes · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002W1
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.09
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 3 m
From: 489 m
To: 492 m
Hole Depth: 530 m
Intercept Depth: 121 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002W1:489-492
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept in JDD002W1 shows very low-grade gold mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall value and is not new information.

Positive factors

Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

Gold grade is very low.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD002W1Jukes · silverGrade: 1.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD002W1
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 1.67
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 3 m
From: 489 m
To: 492 m
Hole Depth: 530 m
Intercept Depth: 121 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD002W1:489-492
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383670
Northing: 5331179
Elevation: 622 m
Azimuth: 254 °
Dip: -75 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept in JDD002W1 shows very low-grade silver mineralization, contributing minimally to the overall value and is not new information.

Positive factors

Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

Silver grade is very low.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“1.67”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD003Jukes · copperGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 27.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD003
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.34
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 27.2 m
From: 150 m
To: 177.2 m
Hole Depth: 254.9 m
Intercept Depth: 150 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD003:150-177.2
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383491
Northing: 5331426
Elevation: 562 m
Azimuth: 280 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 0.46
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2025-11-11T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept in JDD003 shows moderate copper mineralization over a significant width, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Moderate copper grade over a significant width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.34”

Context: 27.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD003Jukes · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD003
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.14
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 27.2 m
From: 150 m
To: 177.2 m
Hole Depth: 254.9 m
Intercept Depth: 150 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD003:150-177.2
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383491
Northing: 5331426
Elevation: 562 m
Azimuth: 280 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2025-11-11T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept in JDD003 shows low-grade gold mineralization over a significant width, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Gold is present as a secondary commodity over a significant width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

Low gold grade over a significant width.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 27.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD003Jukes · silverGrade: 2.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD003
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 2.6
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 27.2 m
From: 150 m
To: 177.2 m
Hole Depth: 254.9 m
Intercept Depth: 150 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD003:150-177.2
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383491
Northing: 5331426
Elevation: 562 m
Azimuth: 280 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.1
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 5 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2025-11-11T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept in JDD003 shows low-grade silver mineralization over a significant width, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Silver is present as a secondary commodity over a significant width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

Low silver grade over a significant width.
True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“2.60”

Context: 27.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD003Jukes · copperGrade: 0.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD003
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.81
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 9 m
From: 166 m
To: 175 m
Hole Depth: 254.9 m
Intercept Depth: 150 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD003:166-175
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383491
Northing: 5331426
Elevation: 562 m
Azimuth: 280 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2025-11-11T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval in JDD003 shows good copper mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Good copper grade over a moderate width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.81”

Context: 9.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD003Jukes · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD003
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.21
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 9 m
From: 166 m
To: 175 m
Hole Depth: 254.9 m
Intercept Depth: 150 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD003:166-175
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383491
Northing: 5331426
Elevation: 562 m
Azimuth: 280 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2025-11-11T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval in JDD003 shows moderate gold mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Gold is present as a secondary commodity over a moderate width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: 9.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD003Jukes · silverGrade: 6.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD003
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 6.2
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 9 m
From: 166 m
To: 175 m
Hole Depth: 254.9 m
Intercept Depth: 150 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD003:166-175
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383491
Northing: 5331426
Elevation: 562 m
Azimuth: 280 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2025-11-11T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval in JDD003 shows good silver mineralization, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

Good silver grade over a moderate width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“6.20”

Context: 9.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD003Jukes · copperGrade: 2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD003
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 2
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 2 m
From: 169 m
To: 171 m
Hole Depth: 254.9 m
Intercept Depth: 150 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Program: exploration
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD003:169-171
Mining Method: mixed

Location

Easting: 383491
Northing: 5331426
Elevation: 562 m
Azimuth: 280 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag: No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 2.5
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.3
Cutoff Unit: % Cu
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 2 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes
Historical Source Date: 2025-11-11T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical high-grade copper intercept in JDD003 is a significant result, providing context for current drilling, but is not new information.

Positive factors

High-grade copper intercept over a narrow but significant width.
Historical result that established the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

True width is not determined, potentially overstating the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“2.00”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · copperGrade: 0.98Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.98
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 4 m
From: 89 m
To: 93 m
Intercept Depth: 89 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:89-93
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.98 % copper is exceptional against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 3.9 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

0.98 % copper is exceptional on the iocg deposit band.

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.98”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · goldGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.17
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 4 m
From: 89 m
To: 93 m
Intercept Depth: 89 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:89-93
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.17 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

0.17 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.17”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · silverGrade: 5.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 5.1
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 4 m
From: 89 m
To: 93 m
Intercept Depth: 89 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:89-93
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 20.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

5.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.10”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · copperGrade: 5.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.15 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 5.34
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 1.15 m
From: 213.85 m
To: 215 m
Intercept Depth: 213.85 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:213.85-215
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.34 % copper is exceptional against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 6.1 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

5.34 % copper is exceptional on the iocg deposit band.

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.34”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · goldGrade: 1.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 1.72
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 1.15 m
From: 213.85 m
To: 215 m
Intercept Depth: 213.85 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:213.85-215
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.72 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.72”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · silverGrade: 24.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 24.8
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 1.15 m
From: 213.85 m
To: 215 m
Intercept Depth: 213.85 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:213.85-215
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 24.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 28.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

24.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“24.8”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · copperGrade: 0.94Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.1 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.94
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 10.1 m
From: 128.5 m
To: 138.6 m
Intercept Depth: 128.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:128.5-138.6
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.94 % copper is exceptional against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 9.5 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

0.94 % copper is exceptional on the iocg deposit band.

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.94”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · goldGrade: 0.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.1 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.69
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 10.1 m
From: 128.5 m
To: 138.6 m
Intercept Depth: 128.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:128.5-138.6
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.69 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 7.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.69”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · silverGrade: 4.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.1 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 4.27
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 10.1 m
From: 128.5 m
To: 138.6 m
Intercept Depth: 128.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:128.5-138.6
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.27 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 43.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

4.27 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.27”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · copperGrade: 2.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 2.17
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 3.1 m
From: 135.5 m
To: 138.6 m
Intercept Depth: 135.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:135.5-138.6
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.17 % copper is exceptional against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 6.7 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

2.17 % copper is exceptional on the iocg deposit band.

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.17”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · goldGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 2.1
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 3.1 m
From: 135.5 m
To: 138.6 m
Intercept Depth: 135.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:135.5-138.6
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.1 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

2.1 g/t gold is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.1”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · silverGrade: 9.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 9.25
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 3.1 m
From: 135.5 m
To: 138.6 m
Intercept Depth: 135.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:135.5-138.6
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 28.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

9.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.25”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · copperGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.67
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 10 m
From: 194 m
To: 204 m
Intercept Depth: 194 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:194-204
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.67 % copper is strong against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 6.7 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

0.67 % copper is strong on the iocg deposit band.

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.67”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · goldGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.29
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 10 m
From: 194 m
To: 204 m
Intercept Depth: 194 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:194-204
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.29 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

0.29 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.29”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · silverGrade: 4.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 4.43
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 10 m
From: 194 m
To: 204 m
Intercept Depth: 194 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:194-204
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.43 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 44.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

4.43 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.43”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · copperGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.86
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 19 m
From: 529 m
To: 548 m
Intercept Depth: 529 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:529-548
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.86 % copper is strong against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 16.3 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

0.86 % copper is strong on the iocg deposit band.

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.86”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · goldGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.48
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 19 m
From: 529 m
To: 548 m
Intercept Depth: 529 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:529-548
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.48 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 9.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.48”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · silverGrade: 5.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 5.58
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 19 m
From: 529 m
To: 548 m
Intercept Depth: 529 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:529-548
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.58 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 106.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

5.58 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.58”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · copperGrade: 4.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.05 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 4.2
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 2.05 m
From: 545.4 m
To: 547.45 m
Intercept Depth: 545.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:545.4-547.45
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.2 % copper is exceptional against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 8.6 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

4.2 % copper is exceptional on the iocg deposit band.

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.20”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · goldGrade: 1.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.05 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 1.66
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 2.05 m
From: 545.4 m
To: 547.45 m
Intercept Depth: 545.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:545.4-547.45
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.66 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.66”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · silverGrade: 29.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.05 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 29.16
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 2.05 m
From: 545.4 m
To: 547.45 m
Intercept Depth: 545.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:545.4-547.45
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 29.16 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 59.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

29.16 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“29.16”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD003Jukes · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD003
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.56
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 2 m
From: 169 m
To: 171 m
Intercept Depth: 169 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD003:169-171
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.56 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.56”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD003Jukes · silverGrade: 15.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD003
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 15.8
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 2 m
From: 169 m
To: 171 m
Intercept Depth: 169 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD003:169-171
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 31.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

15.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“15.8”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD004Jukes · copperGrade: 1.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.2 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD004
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 1.32
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 5.2 m
From: 70 m
To: 75.2 m
Intercept Depth: 70 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD004:70-75.2
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.32 % copper is exceptional against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 6.9 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

1.32 % copper is exceptional on the iocg deposit band.

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.32”

Context: JDD004

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD004Jukes · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.2 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD004
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.12
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 5.2 m
From: 70 m
To: 75.2 m
Intercept Depth: 70 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD004:70-75.2
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

0.12 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: JDD004

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD004Jukes · silverGrade: 7.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.2 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD004
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 7.42
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 5.2 m
From: 70 m
To: 75.2 m
Intercept Depth: 70 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD004:70-75.2
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.42 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 38.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

7.42 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.42”

Context: JDD004

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD004Jukes · copperGrade: 1.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.4 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD004
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 1.75
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 3.4 m
From: 71.8 m
To: 75.2 m
Intercept Depth: 71.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD004:71.8-75.2
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.75 % copper is exceptional against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 6.0 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

1.75 % copper is exceptional on the iocg deposit band.

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.75”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD004Jukes · goldGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD004
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.17
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 3.4 m
From: 71.8 m
To: 75.2 m
Intercept Depth: 71.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD004:71.8-75.2
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.17 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

0.17 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.17”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD004Jukes · silverGrade: 9.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD004
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 9.33
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 3.4 m
From: 71.8 m
To: 75.2 m
Intercept Depth: 71.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD004:71.8-75.2
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.33 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 31.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

9.33 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.33”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD004Jukes · copperGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: %Intercept: 38 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD004
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.52
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 38 m
From: 92 m
To: 130 m
Intercept Depth: 92 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD004:92-130
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.52 % copper is strong against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 19.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

0.52 % copper is strong on the iocg deposit band.

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.52”

Context: JDD004

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD004Jukes · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD004
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.1
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 38 m
From: 92 m
To: 130 m
Intercept Depth: 92 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD004:92-130
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: JDD004

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD004Jukes · silverGrade: 2.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD004
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 2.53
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 38 m
From: 92 m
To: 130 m
Intercept Depth: 92 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD004:92-130
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.53 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 96.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

2.53 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.53”

Context: JDD004

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD004Jukes · copperGrade: 6.95Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD004
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 6.95
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 1 m
From: 92.6 m
To: 93.6 m
Intercept Depth: 92.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD004:92.6-93.6
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.95 % copper is exceptional against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 7.0 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

6.95 % copper is exceptional on the iocg deposit band.

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.95”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD004Jukes · goldGrade: 0.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD004
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.53
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 1 m
From: 92.6 m
To: 93.6 m
Intercept Depth: 92.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD004:92.6-93.6
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.53 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.53”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD004Jukes · silverGrade: 23.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD004
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 23.4
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 1 m
From: 92.6 m
To: 93.6 m
Intercept Depth: 92.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD004:92.6-93.6
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 23.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

23.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“23.4”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · copperGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.6 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.75
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 12.6 m
From: 109.9 m
To: 122.5 m
Intercept Depth: 109.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:109.9-122.5
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.75 % copper is strong against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 9.4 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

0.75 % copper is strong on the iocg deposit band.

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.75”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.6 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.15
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 12.6 m
From: 109.9 m
To: 122.5 m
Intercept Depth: 109.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:109.9-122.5
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.15 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

0.15 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · silverGrade: 3.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.6 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 3.43
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 12.6 m
From: 109.9 m
To: 122.5 m
Intercept Depth: 109.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:109.9-122.5
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.43 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 43.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

3.43 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.43”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · copperGrade: 2.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 2.05
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 1.1 m
From: 109.9 m
To: 111 m
Intercept Depth: 109.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:109.9-111
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.05 % copper is exceptional against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 2.3 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

2.05 % copper is exceptional on the iocg deposit band.

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.05”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · goldGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.72
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 1.1 m
From: 109.9 m
To: 111 m
Intercept Depth: 109.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:109.9-111
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.72 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.72”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · silverGrade: 9.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 9.55
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 1.1 m
From: 109.9 m
To: 111 m
Intercept Depth: 109.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:109.9-111
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.55 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

9.55 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.55”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · copperGrade: 5.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 5.75
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 1 m
From: 121.5 m
To: 122.5 m
Intercept Depth: 121.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:121.5-122.5
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.75 % copper is exceptional against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 5.8 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

5.75 % copper is exceptional on the iocg deposit band.

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.75”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · goldGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.52
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 1 m
From: 121.5 m
To: 122.5 m
Intercept Depth: 121.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:121.5-122.5
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.52 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.52”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · silverGrade: 17.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 17.25
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 1 m
From: 121.5 m
To: 122.5 m
Intercept Depth: 121.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:121.5-122.5
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 17.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

17.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“17.25”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD004Jukes · copperGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD004
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.35
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 25 m
From: 200 m
To: 225 m
Intercept Depth: 200 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD004:200-225
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.35 % copper is moderate against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 8.8 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Context: JDD004

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD004Jukes · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD004
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.21
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 25 m
From: 200 m
To: 225 m
Intercept Depth: 200 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD004:200-225
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.21 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

0.21 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: JDD004

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD004Jukes · silverGrade: 1.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD004
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 1.92
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 25 m
From: 200 m
To: 225 m
Intercept Depth: 200 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD004:200-225
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.92 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 48.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

1.92 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.92”

Context: JDD004

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD004Jukes · copperGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD004
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.73
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 10 m
From: 204 m
To: 214 m
Intercept Depth: 204 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD004:204-214
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.73 % copper is strong against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 7.3 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

0.73 % copper is strong on the iocg deposit band.

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.73”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD004Jukes · goldGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD004
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.43
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 10 m
From: 204 m
To: 214 m
Intercept Depth: 204 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD004:204-214
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.43 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 4.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.43”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD004Jukes · silverGrade: 4.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD004
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 4.11
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 10 m
From: 204 m
To: 214 m
Intercept Depth: 204 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD004:204-214
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.11 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 41.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

4.11 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.11”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD004Jukes · copperGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD004
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 2.5
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 1 m
From: 206 m
To: 207 m
Intercept Depth: 206 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD004:206-207
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.5 % copper is exceptional against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 2.5 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

2.5 % copper is exceptional on the iocg deposit band.

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.50”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD004Jukes · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD004
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 0.56
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 1 m
From: 206 m
To: 207 m
Intercept Depth: 206 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD004:206-207
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.56 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.56”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

JDD004Jukes · silverGrade: 9.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: JDD004
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 9.64
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 1 m
From: 206 m
To: 207 m
Intercept Depth: 206 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: JDD004:206-207
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.64 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

9.64 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.64”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · copperGrade: 1.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: copper
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 1.39
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 2 m
From: 212 m
To: 214 m
Intercept Depth: 212 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:212-214
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.39 % copper is exceptional against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 2.8 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

1.39 % copper is exceptional on the iocg deposit band.

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.39”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · goldGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: gold
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 1.11
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 2 m
From: 212 m
To: 214 m
Intercept Depth: 212 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:212-214
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.11 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.11”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

andJukes · silverGrade: 10.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: and
Project: Jukes
Commodity: silver
Region: australia_tas
Reported Region: australia_tas
Ticker: CPER

Geometry

Grade: 10.07
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 2 m
From: 212 m
To: 214 m
Intercept Depth: 212 m

Classification

Deposit Type: iocg
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: and:212-214
Mining Method: mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory: ALS commercial laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes

Dates

Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.07 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 20.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

10.07 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.07”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Our neighbour, Sibanye-Stillwater, recently released an updated mineral reserve estimate and feasibility study for the M"

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.