CopperCorp Intersects 132.0m @ 0.35% Cu and 0.19g/t Au in First Drill Hole at the Jukes Prospect
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- CopperCorp Resources Inc.
- Ticker
- CPER
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Primary commodity
- Copper
- Secondary commodities
- Gold
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-13 19:27:44 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
CopperCorp has reported encouraging results from its first drill hole (JDD001) at the Jukes prospect, intersecting a 132.0m wide zone of copper-gold mineralization. The hole included several high-grade intercepts, including 3.1m at 2.17% Cu and 2.1 g/t Au, confirming the presence of a fertile IOCG system.
Reasoning: First drill hole at Jukes prospect returned a broad 132m intercept with multiple high-grade sub-intervals, confirming the presence of a significant IOCG-style system and extending known mineralization.
Positive factors
- significant width of mineralization
- multiple high-grade zones intersected
- extension of historical mineralization
- discovery of previously unknown zones
- IOCG affinity confirmed
Negative factors
- true width not yet determined
Facts used in scoring: 18
Classification and evidence
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The hole was designed to test depth extensions to high-grade mineralization in historical workings.
Evidence · text
“designed to test depth extensions to high-grade Cu-Au mineralization in historical underground mine workings”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details specific QA/QC protocols including CRMs, blanks, and duplicates.
Evidence · text
“Certified reference materials (CRMs), blank and duplicate QAQC samples are included”
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: The 3.1m @ 2.17% Cu and 2.1 g/t Au intercept is exceptionally high grade for this system.
Evidence · table
“2.17”
Context: 3.1
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 18. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (18)
JDD001Jukes prospect · copperGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 132 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes prospect
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 132 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 204 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:72-204
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Jukes
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 8 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Broad 132m intercept at 0.35% Cu provides a significant mineralized footprint.
Positive factors
- broad mineralized interval
Evidence · table
“0.35”
Context: 132.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD001Jukes prospect · goldGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 132 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes prospect
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 132 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 204 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:72-204
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Jukes
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 8 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Gold grade is modest within the broad copper interval.
Evidence · table
“0.19”
Context: 132.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD001Jukes prospect · copperGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes prospect
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.75
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 25 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 97 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:72-97
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Jukes
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong 25m intercept at 0.75% Cu.
Positive factors
- significant width
Evidence · table
“0.75”
Context: 25.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD001Jukes prospect · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes prospect
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 25 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 97 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:72-97
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Jukes
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 0.4 g/t Au over 25m.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: 25.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD001Jukes prospect · copperGrade: 0.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes prospect
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.81
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 85 m
- To
- 94 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 85 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:85-94
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Jukes
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High grade sub-interval within the first zone.
Evidence · table
“0.81”
Context: 9.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD001Jukes prospect · goldGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes prospect
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.76
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 85 m
- To
- 94 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 85 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:85-94
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Jukes
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 0.76 g/t Au over 9m.
Evidence · table
“0.76”
Context: 9.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD001Jukes prospect · copperGrade: 0.94Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes prospect
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.94
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.1 m
- From
- 128.5 m
- To
- 138.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 128.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:128.5-138.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Jukes
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High grade zone previously unknown.
Evidence · table
“0.94”
Context: 10.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD001Jukes prospect · goldGrade: 0.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes prospect
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.69
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.1 m
- From
- 128.5 m
- To
- 138.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 128.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:128.5-138.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Jukes
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 0.69 g/t Au over 10.1m.
Evidence · table
“0.69”
Context: 10.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD001Jukes prospect · copperGrade: 2.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes prospect
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 135.5 m
- To
- 138.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 135.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:135.5-138.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Jukes
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High grade 2.17% Cu intercept.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
Evidence · table
“2.17”
Context: 3.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD001Jukes prospect · goldGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes prospect
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 135.5 m
- To
- 138.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 135.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:135.5-138.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Jukes
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High grade 2.1 g/t Au intercept.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: 3.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD001Jukes prospect · copperGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes prospect
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.67
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 194 m
- To
- 204 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 194 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:194-204
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Jukes
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 0.67% Cu over 10m.
Evidence · table
“0.67”
Context: 10.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD001Jukes prospect · goldGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes prospect
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 194 m
- To
- 204 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 194 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:194-204
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Jukes
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 0.29 g/t Au over 10m.
Evidence · table
“0.29”
Context: 10.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
andJukes prospect · copperGrade: 0.94Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Jukes prospect
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.94
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.1 m
- From
- 128.5 m
- To
- 138.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 128.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:128.5-138.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.94 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 9.5 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.94”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andJukes prospect · goldGrade: 0.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Jukes prospect
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.69
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.1 m
- From
- 128.5 m
- To
- 138.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 128.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:128.5-138.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.69 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 7.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.69”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andJukes prospect · copperGrade: 2.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Jukes prospect
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 135.5 m
- To
- 138.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 135.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:135.5-138.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.17 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 6.7 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.17 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.17”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andJukes prospect · goldGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Jukes prospect
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 135.5 m
- To
- 138.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 135.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:135.5-138.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.1 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.1 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andJukes prospect · copperGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Jukes prospect
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.67
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 194 m
- To
- 204 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 194 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:194-204
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.67 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 6.7 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.67”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andJukes prospect · goldGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Jukes prospect
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 194 m
- To
- 204 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 194 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:194-204
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.29 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.29 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.29”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.