CopperCorp Intersects High-Grade Cu-Au Mineralization at Jukes Prospect
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- CopperCorp Resources Inc.
- Ticker
- CPER
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Primary commodity
- Copper
- Secondary commodities
- Gold, Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-13 19:08:16 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
CopperCorp announced high-grade copper-gold-silver assay results from its Phase 2 drilling campaign at the Jukes prospect in western Tasmania, Australia. The new drillholes, JDD003 and JDD004, confirmed mineralization extending approximately 300 meters along strike from previous drilling, with notable intercepts including 1.0m at 6.95% Cu, 0.53g/t Au, 23.4g/t Ag (7.48% CuEq) from 92.6m in JDD004. The company also reported high-grade channel sampling results and re-presented historical drill and channel data, all contributing to an improved understanding of the structurally controlled Cu-Au-Ag system.
Reasoning: CopperCorp's Phase 2 drilling at Jukes prospect returned high-grade copper-gold-silver intercepts, extending the known mineralization along strike and confirming the geological model. The results are supported by robust QA/QC and transparent reporting.
Positive factors
- High-grade copper-gold-silver intercepts from new Phase 2 drilling
- Extension of mineralization approximately 300m along strike
- Confirmation of structurally controlled high-grade shoots and veins
- Detailed QA/QC procedures disclosed, including certified lab and QP sign-off
- Metal equivalent assumptions fully disclosed
- Cut-off grades and internal dilution rules clearly stated
Negative factors
- True width of mineralization not yet determined
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples, CuEq based on nearby historical operations
Facts used in scoring: 174
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 174. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (174)
JDD003Jukes · copperGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 27.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD003
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.34
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 27.2 m
- From
- 150 m
- To
- 177.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 254.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 150 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD003:150-177.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383491
- Northing
- 5331426
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 280 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.46
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate copper intercept from new Phase 2 drilling, contributing to strike extension.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.34”
Context: 27.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD003Jukes · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD003
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 27.2 m
- From
- 150 m
- To
- 177.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 254.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 150 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD003:150-177.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383491
- Northing
- 5331426
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 280 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: 27.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD003Jukes · silverGrade: 2.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD003
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 27.2 m
- From
- 150 m
- To
- 177.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 254.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 150 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD003:150-177.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383491
- Northing
- 5331426
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 280 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver intercept from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“2.6”
Context: 27.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD003Jukes · copperGrade: 0.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD003
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.81
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 166 m
- To
- 175 m
- Hole Depth
- 254.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 150 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD003:166-175
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383491
- Northing
- 5331426
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 280 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong copper intercept from new Phase 2 drilling, part of a broader mineralized zone.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.81”
Context: 9.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD003Jukes · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD003
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 166 m
- To
- 175 m
- Hole Depth
- 254.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 150 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD003:166-175
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383491
- Northing
- 5331426
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 280 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.21”
Context: 9.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD003Jukes · silverGrade: 6.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD003
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 166 m
- To
- 175 m
- Hole Depth
- 254.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 150 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD003:166-175
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383491
- Northing
- 5331426
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 280 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver intercept from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“6.2”
Context: 9.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD003Jukes · copperGrade: 2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD003
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 169 m
- To
- 171 m
- Hole Depth
- 254.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 150 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD003:169-171
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383491
- Northing
- 5331426
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 280 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade copper sub-interval from new Phase 2 drilling.
Positive factors
- High-grade copper intercept
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD003Jukes · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD003
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 169 m
- To
- 171 m
- Hole Depth
- 254.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 150 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD003:169-171
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383491
- Northing
- 5331426
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 280 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold sub-interval from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.56”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD003Jukes · silverGrade: 15.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD003
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 169 m
- To
- 171 m
- Hole Depth
- 254.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 150 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD003:169-171
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383491
- Northing
- 5331426
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 280 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver sub-interval from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“15.8”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · copperGrade: 1.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.32
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.2 m
- From
- 70 m
- To
- 75.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:70-75.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.46
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong copper intercept from new Phase 2 drilling.
Positive factors
- Strong copper intercept
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“1.32”
Context: 5.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.2 m
- From
- 70 m
- To
- 75.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:70-75.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: 5.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · silverGrade: 7.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.2 m
- From
- 70 m
- To
- 75.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:70-75.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver intercept from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“7.42”
Context: 5.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · copperGrade: 1.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.75
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 71.8 m
- To
- 75.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:71.8-75.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 19.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade copper sub-interval from new Phase 2 drilling.
Positive factors
- High-grade copper intercept
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“1.75”
Context: 3.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · goldGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 71.8 m
- To
- 75.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:71.8-75.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade gold sub-interval from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.17”
Context: 3.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · silverGrade: 9.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 71.8 m
- To
- 75.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:71.8-75.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver sub-interval from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“9.33”
Context: 3.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · copperGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: %Intercept: 38 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.52
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 38 m
- From
- 92 m
- To
- 130 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:92-130
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.61
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate copper intercept over a significant width from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.52”
Context: 38.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 38 m
- From
- 92 m
- To
- 130 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:92-130
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: 38.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · silverGrade: 2.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 38 m
- From
- 92 m
- To
- 130 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:92-130
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver intercept from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“2.53”
Context: 38.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · copperGrade: 6.95Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.95
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 92.6 m
- To
- 93.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:92.6-93.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.48
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade copper sub-interval from new Phase 2 drilling.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- Exceptional copper grade
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“6.95”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · goldGrade: 0.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 92.6 m
- To
- 93.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:92.6-93.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold sub-interval from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.53”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · silverGrade: 23.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 92.6 m
- To
- 93.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:92.6-93.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver sub-interval from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“23.4”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · copperGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.75
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12.6 m
- From
- 109.9 m
- To
- 122.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:109.9-122.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.88
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong copper intercept over a good width from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.75”
Context: 12.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.6 m
- From
- 109.9 m
- To
- 122.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:109.9-122.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.15”
Context: 12.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · silverGrade: 3.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.6 m
- From
- 109.9 m
- To
- 122.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:109.9-122.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver intercept from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“3.43”
Context: 12.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · copperGrade: 2.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 109.9 m
- To
- 111 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:109.9-111
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.62
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade copper sub-interval from new Phase 2 drilling.
Positive factors
- High-grade copper intercept
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“2.05”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · goldGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 109.9 m
- To
- 111 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:109.9-111
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold sub-interval from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.72”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · silverGrade: 9.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 109.9 m
- To
- 111 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:109.9-111
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver sub-interval from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“9.55”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · copperGrade: 5.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.75
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 121.5 m
- To
- 122.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:121.5-122.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.23
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade copper sub-interval from new Phase 2 drilling.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- Exceptional copper grade
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“5.75”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · goldGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 121.5 m
- To
- 122.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:121.5-122.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold sub-interval from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.52”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · silverGrade: 17.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 121.5 m
- To
- 122.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:121.5-122.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver sub-interval from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“17.25”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · copperGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 25 m
- From
- 200 m
- To
- 225 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:200-225
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.51
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate copper intercept over a significant width from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.35”
Context: 25.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 25 m
- From
- 200 m
- To
- 225 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:200-225
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.21”
Context: 25.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · silverGrade: 1.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.92
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 25 m
- From
- 200 m
- To
- 225 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:200-225
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver intercept from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“1.92”
Context: 25.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · copperGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.73
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 204 m
- To
- 214 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:204-214
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.06
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong copper intercept over a good width from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.73”
Context: 10.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · goldGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 204 m
- To
- 214 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:204-214
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold intercept from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.43”
Context: 10.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · silverGrade: 4.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 204 m
- To
- 214 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:204-214
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver intercept from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“4.11”
Context: 10.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · copperGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 206 m
- To
- 207 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:206-207
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.96
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade copper sub-interval from new Phase 2 drilling.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“2.5”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 206 m
- To
- 207 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:206-207
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold sub-interval from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.56”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · silverGrade: 9.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 206 m
- To
- 207 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:206-207
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver sub-interval from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“9.64”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · copperGrade: 1.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.39
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 212 m
- To
- 214 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:212-214
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.24
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong copper sub-interval from new Phase 2 drilling.
Positive factors
- Strong copper intercept
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“1.39”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · goldGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 212 m
- To
- 214 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:212-214
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong gold sub-interval from new Phase 2 drilling.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“1.11”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD004Jukes · silverGrade: 10.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD004
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 212 m
- To
- 214 m
- Hole Depth
- 356 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD004:212-214
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383484
- Northing
- 5331422
- Elevation
- 562 m
- Azimuth
- 119 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver sub-interval from new Phase 2 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“10.07”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 18 m
- To
- 23 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:18.0-23.0
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.33
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate copper intercept from new channel sampling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: 5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · goldGrade: 2.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 18 m
- To
- 23 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:18.0-23.0
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong gold intercept from new channel sampling.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“2.87”
Context: 5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · silverGrade: 2.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 18 m
- To
- 23 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:18.0-23.0
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver intercept from new channel sampling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“2.53”
Context: 5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · copperGrade: 0.93Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.93
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 18 m
- To
- 19 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:18.0-19.0
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 8.81
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong copper sub-interval from new channel sampling.
Positive factors
- Strong copper intercept
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.93”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · goldGrade: 11.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 18 m
- To
- 19 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:18.0-19.0
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade gold sub-interval from new channel sampling.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“11.15”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · silverGrade: 7.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 18 m
- To
- 19 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:18.0-19.0
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver sub-interval from new channel sampling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“7.46”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · copperGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.58
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 34 m
- To
- 40 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:34.0-40.0
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate copper intercept from new channel sampling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.58”
Context: 6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 34 m
- To
- 40 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:34.0-40.0
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept from new channel sampling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: 6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · silverGrade: 6.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 34 m
- To
- 40 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:34.0-40.0
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver intercept from new channel sampling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“6.09”
Context: 6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · copperGrade: 1.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.22
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 35 m
- To
- 37 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:35.0-37.0
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.41
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong copper sub-interval from new channel sampling.
Positive factors
- Strong copper intercept
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“1.22”
Context: 2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 35 m
- To
- 37 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:35.0-37.0
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade gold sub-interval from new channel sampling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: 2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · silverGrade: 13.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 35 m
- To
- 37 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:35.0-37.0
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver sub-interval from new channel sampling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“13.05”
Context: 2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 169.7 m
- To
- 177.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 169.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:169.7-177.7
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.03
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak copper intercept from new channel sampling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: 8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · goldGrade: 1.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 169.7 m
- To
- 177.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 169.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:169.7-177.7
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong gold intercept from new channel sampling.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“1.16”
Context: 8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · silverGrade: 1.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.79
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 169.7 m
- To
- 177.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 169.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:169.7-177.7
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver intercept from new channel sampling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“1.79”
Context: 8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · copperGrade: 0.84Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.84
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 219.7 m
- To
- 221.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 219.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:219.7-221.7
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.93
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong copper intercept from new channel sampling.
Positive factors
- Strong copper intercept
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.84”
Context: 2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 219.7 m
- To
- 221.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 219.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:219.7-221.7
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak gold intercept from new channel sampling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · silverGrade: 7.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 219.7 m
- To
- 221.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 219.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:219.7-221.7
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver intercept from new channel sampling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“7.9”
Context: 2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · copperGrade: 3.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.62
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 230.5 m
- To
- 231.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 230.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:230.5-231.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.28
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade copper intercept from new channel sampling.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“3.62”
Context: 5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · goldGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 230.5 m
- To
- 231.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 230.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:230.5-231.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold intercept from new channel sampling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.62”
Context: 5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · silverGrade: 32.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 32.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 230.5 m
- To
- 231.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 230.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:230.5-231.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver intercept from new channel sampling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“32.62”
Context: 5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · copperGrade: 7.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 234.5 m
- To
- 235.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 230.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:234.5-235.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 9.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade copper sub-interval from new channel sampling.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- Exceptional copper grade
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“7.5”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · goldGrade: 2.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 234.5 m
- To
- 235.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 230.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:234.5-235.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong gold sub-interval from new channel sampling.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“2.18”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · silverGrade: 46.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 46.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 234.5 m
- To
- 235.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 230.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:234.5-235.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver sub-interval from new channel sampling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“46.7”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 26 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 26 m
- From
- 252 m
- To
- 277.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 252 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:252.0-277.7
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.33
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate copper intercept over a significant width from new channel sampling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: 26
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 26 m
- From
- 252 m
- To
- 277.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 252 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:252.0-277.7
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak gold intercept from new channel sampling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 26
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · silverGrade: 1.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 26 m
- From
- 252 m
- To
- 277.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 252 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:252.0-277.7
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver intercept from new channel sampling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“1.02”
Context: 26
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · copperGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.78
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 256 m
- To
- 261 m
- Intercept Depth
- 252 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:256.0-261.0
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.79
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong copper sub-interval from new channel sampling.
Positive factors
- Strong copper intercept
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.78”
Context: 5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 256 m
- To
- 261 m
- Intercept Depth
- 252 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:256.0-261.0
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak gold intercept from new channel sampling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
MJCS001Jukes · silverGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJCS001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- western Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 256 m
- To
- 261 m
- Intercept Depth
- 252 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- MJCS001:256.0-261.0
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver intercept from new channel sampling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.72”
Context: 5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
JDD001Jukes · copperGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 132 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 132 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 204 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:72-204
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.49
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate copper intercept over a very significant width from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.35”
Context: 132
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD001Jukes · goldGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 132 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 132 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 204 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:72-204
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.19”
Context: 132
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD001Jukes · silverGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 132 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 132 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 204 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:72-204
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver intercept from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 132
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD001Jukes · copperGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.75
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 25 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 97 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:72-97
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.04
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong copper intercept over a good width from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.75”
Context: 25
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD001Jukes · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 25 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 97 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:72-97
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold intercept from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: 25
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD001Jukes · silverGrade: 1.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 25 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 97 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:72-97
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver intercept from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“1.62”
Context: 25
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD001Jukes · copperGrade: 0.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.81
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 85 m
- To
- 94 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:85-94
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong copper intercept from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.81”
Context: 9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD001Jukes · goldGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.76
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 85 m
- To
- 94 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:85-94
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold intercept from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.76”
Context: 9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD001Jukes · silverGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 85 m
- To
- 94 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:85-94
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver intercept from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: 9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD001Jukes · copperGrade: 0.94Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.94
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.1 m
- From
- 128.5 m
- To
- 138.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:128.5-138.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.45
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong copper intercept over a good width from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.94”
Context: 10.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD001Jukes · goldGrade: 0.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.69
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.1 m
- From
- 128.5 m
- To
- 138.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:128.5-138.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold intercept from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.69”
Context: 10.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD001Jukes · silverGrade: 4.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.1 m
- From
- 128.5 m
- To
- 138.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:128.5-138.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver intercept from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“4.27”
Context: 10.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD001Jukes · copperGrade: 2.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 135.5 m
- To
- 138.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:135.5-138.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.71
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade copper sub-interval from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Positive factors
- High-grade copper intercept
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“2.17”
Context: 3.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD001Jukes · goldGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 135.5 m
- To
- 138.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:135.5-138.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong gold sub-interval from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: 3.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD001Jukes · silverGrade: 9.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 135.5 m
- To
- 138.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:135.5-138.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver sub-interval from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“9.25”
Context: 3.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD001Jukes · copperGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.67
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 194 m
- To
- 204 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:194-204
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate copper intercept over a good width from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.67”
Context: 10
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD001Jukes · goldGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 194 m
- To
- 204 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:194-204
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.29”
Context: 10
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD001Jukes · silverGrade: 4.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD001
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 194 m
- To
- 204 m
- Hole Depth
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD001:194-204
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 258 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver intercept from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“4.43”
Context: 10
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD002Jukes · copperGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 14.8 m
- From
- 122.2 m
- To
- 137 m
- Hole Depth
- 310 m
- Intercept Depth
- 122.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002:122.2-137
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 254 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.19
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak copper intercept from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Negative factors
- Weak copper grade
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: 14.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD002Jukes · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.8 m
- From
- 122.2 m
- To
- 137 m
- Hole Depth
- 310 m
- Intercept Depth
- 122.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002:122.2-137
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 254 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very weak gold intercept from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Negative factors
- Weak gold grade
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 14.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD002Jukes · silverGrade: 0.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.93
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.8 m
- From
- 122.2 m
- To
- 137 m
- Hole Depth
- 310 m
- Intercept Depth
- 122.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002:122.2-137
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 254 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very weak silver intercept from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Negative factors
- Weak silver grade
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.93”
Context: 14.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD002W1Jukes · copperGrade: 0.66Grade Unit: %Intercept: 50 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.66
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 50 m
- From
- 498 m
- To
- 548 m
- Hole Depth
- 530 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:498-548
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 254 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.87
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate copper intercept over a significant width from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.66”
Context: 50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD002W1Jukes · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 50 m
- From
- 498 m
- To
- 548 m
- Hole Depth
- 530 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:498-548
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 254 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.27”
Context: 50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD002W1Jukes · silverGrade: 3.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 50 m
- From
- 498 m
- To
- 548 m
- Hole Depth
- 530 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:498-548
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 254 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver intercept from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“3.57”
Context: 50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD002W1Jukes · copperGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: %Intercept: 20 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.76
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 498 m
- To
- 518 m
- Hole Depth
- 530 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:498-518
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 254 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong copper intercept over a good width from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.76”
Context: 20
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD002W1Jukes · goldGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 498 m
- To
- 518 m
- Hole Depth
- 530 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:498-518
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 254 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade gold intercept from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.17”
Context: 20
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD002W1Jukes · silverGrade: 3.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 498 m
- To
- 518 m
- Hole Depth
- 530 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:498-518
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 254 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver intercept from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“3.32”
Context: 20
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD002W1Jukes · copperGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.86
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 19 m
- From
- 529 m
- To
- 548 m
- Hole Depth
- 530 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:529-548
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 254 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.24
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong copper intercept over a good width from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.86”
Context: 19
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD002W1Jukes · goldGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19 m
- From
- 529 m
- To
- 548 m
- Hole Depth
- 530 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:529-548
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 254 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold intercept from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“0.48”
Context: 19
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD002W1Jukes · silverGrade: 5.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19 m
- From
- 529 m
- To
- 548 m
- Hole Depth
- 530 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:529-548
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 254 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver intercept from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“5.58”
Context: 19
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD002W1Jukes · copperGrade: 4.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.05 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.05 m
- From
- 545.4 m
- To
- 547.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 530 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:545.4-547.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 254 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.57
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade copper sub-interval from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“4.2”
Context: 2.05
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
JDD002W1Jukes · goldGrade: 1.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.05 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.05 m
- From
- 545.4 m
- To
- 547.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 530 m
- Intercept Depth
- 498 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:545.4-547.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 383670
- Northing
- 5331179
- Elevation
- 622 m
- Azimuth
- 254 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong gold sub-interval from previously reported Phase 1 drilling.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- No metallurgical test work completed on Jukes prospect samples
Evidence · table
“1.66”
Context: 2.05
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
andThe potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes · copperGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- The potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.75
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12.6 m
- From
- 109.9 m
- To
- 122.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 109.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:109.9-122.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.75 % copper is strong against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 9.4 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.75 % copper is strong on the iocg deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.75”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andThe potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- The potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.6 m
- From
- 109.9 m
- To
- 122.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 109.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:109.9-122.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.15 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.15 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.15”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andThe potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes · silverGrade: 3.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- The potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.6 m
- From
- 109.9 m
- To
- 122.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 109.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:109.9-122.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.43 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 43.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.43 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.43”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andThe potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes · copperGrade: 2.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- The potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 109.9 m
- To
- 111 m
- Intercept Depth
- 109.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:109.9-111
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.05 % copper is exceptional against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 2.3 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.05 % copper is exceptional on the iocg deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.05”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andThe potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes · goldGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- The potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 109.9 m
- To
- 111 m
- Intercept Depth
- 109.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:109.9-111
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.72 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.72 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.72”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andThe potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes · silverGrade: 9.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- The potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 109.9 m
- To
- 111 m
- Intercept Depth
- 109.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:109.9-111
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.55 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9.55 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.55”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andThe potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes · copperGrade: 5.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- The potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.75
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 121.5 m
- To
- 122.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 121.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:121.5-122.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.75 % copper is exceptional against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 5.8 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.75 % copper is exceptional on the iocg deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.75”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andThe potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes · goldGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- The potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 121.5 m
- To
- 122.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 121.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:121.5-122.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.52 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.52 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.52”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andThe potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes · silverGrade: 17.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- The potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 121.5 m
- To
- 122.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 121.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:121.5-122.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 17.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 17.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“17.25”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andThe potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes · copperGrade: 1.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- The potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.39
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 212 m
- To
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 212 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:212-214
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.39 % copper is exceptional against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 2.8 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.39 % copper is exceptional on the iocg deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.39”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andThe potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes · goldGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- The potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 212 m
- To
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 212 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:212-214
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.11 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.11 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.11”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andThe potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes · silverGrade: 10.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- The potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 212 m
- To
- 214 m
- Intercept Depth
- 212 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:212-214
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.07 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 20.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 10.07 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.07”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andThe potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes · copperGrade: 0.94Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- The potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.94
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.1 m
- From
- 128.5 m
- To
- 138.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 128.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:128.5-138.6
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.94 % copper is exceptional against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 9.5 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.94 % copper is exceptional on the iocg deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.94”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andThe potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes · goldGrade: 0.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- The potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.69
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.1 m
- From
- 128.5 m
- To
- 138.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 128.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:128.5-138.6
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.69 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.69 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.69”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andThe potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes · silverGrade: 4.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- The potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.1 m
- From
- 128.5 m
- To
- 138.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 128.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:128.5-138.6
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.27 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 43.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.27 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.27”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andThe potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes · copperGrade: 2.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- The potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 135.5 m
- To
- 138.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 135.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:135.5-138.6
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.17 % copper is exceptional against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 6.7 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.17 % copper is exceptional on the iocg deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.17”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andThe potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes · goldGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- The potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 135.5 m
- To
- 138.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 135.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:135.5-138.6
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andThe potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes · silverGrade: 9.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- The potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 135.5 m
- To
- 138.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 135.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:135.5-138.6
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 28.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.25”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andThe potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes · copperGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- The potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.67
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 194 m
- To
- 204 m
- Intercept Depth
- 194 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:194-204
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.67 % copper is strong against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 6.7 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.67 % copper is strong on the iocg deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.67”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andThe potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes · goldGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- The potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 194 m
- To
- 204 m
- Intercept Depth
- 194 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:194-204
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.29 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.29 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.29”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andThe potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes · silverGrade: 4.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- The potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 194 m
- To
- 204 m
- Intercept Depth
- 194 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:194-204
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.43 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 44.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.43 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.43”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andThe potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes · copperGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- The potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.86
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 19 m
- From
- 529 m
- To
- 548 m
- Intercept Depth
- 529 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:529-548
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.86 % copper is strong against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 16.3 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.86 % copper is strong on the iocg deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.86”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andThe potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes · goldGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- The potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19 m
- From
- 529 m
- To
- 548 m
- Intercept Depth
- 529 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:529-548
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.48 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.48 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.48”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andThe potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes · silverGrade: 5.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- The potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19 m
- From
- 529 m
- To
- 548 m
- Intercept Depth
- 529 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:529-548
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.58 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 106.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.58 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.58”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andThe potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes · copperGrade: 4.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- The potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.05 m
- From
- 545.4 m
- To
- 547.45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 545.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:545.4-547.45
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.2 % copper is exceptional against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 8.6 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4.2 % copper is exceptional on the iocg deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.2”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andThe potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes · goldGrade: 1.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- The potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.05 m
- From
- 545.4 m
- To
- 547.45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 545.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:545.4-547.45
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.66 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.66 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.66”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andThe potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes · silverGrade: 29.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- The potential repetition of high-grade zones over this distance significantly upgrades the exploration potential of the Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 29.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.05 m
- From
- 545.4 m
- To
- 547.45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 545.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:545.4-547.45
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 29.16 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 59.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 29.16 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“29.16”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JDD002W1Jukes · copperGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 19 m
- From
- 121 m
- To
- 140 m
- Intercept Depth
- 121 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:121-140
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 % copper is below against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 2.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.11 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.2 %) on the iocg deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: JDD002W1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JDD002W1Jukes · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19 m
- From
- 121 m
- To
- 140 m
- Intercept Depth
- 121 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:121-140
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: JDD002W1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JDD002W1Jukes · silverGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19 m
- From
- 121 m
- To
- 140 m
- Intercept Depth
- 121 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:121-140
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.49 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.49 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.49”
Context: JDD002W1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JDD002W1Jukes · copperGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 214 m
- To
- 220 m
- Intercept Depth
- 214 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:214-220
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.17 % copper is below against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 1.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.17 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.2 %) on the iocg deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.17”
Context: JDD002W1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JDD002W1Jukes · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 214 m
- To
- 220 m
- Intercept Depth
- 214 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:214-220
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.06 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: JDD002W1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JDD002W1Jukes · silverGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 214 m
- To
- 220 m
- Intercept Depth
- 214 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:214-220
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.48 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.48 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.48”
Context: JDD002W1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JDD002W1Jukes · copperGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 400 m
- To
- 424 m
- Intercept Depth
- 400 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:400-424
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.17 % copper is below against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 4.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.17 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.2 %) on the iocg deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.17”
Context: JDD002W1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JDD002W1Jukes · goldGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 400 m
- To
- 424 m
- Intercept Depth
- 400 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:400-424
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.08 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.08 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: JDD002W1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JDD002W1Jukes · silverGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 400 m
- To
- 424 m
- Intercept Depth
- 400 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:400-424
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 26.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.1”
Context: JDD002W1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JDD002W1Jukes · copperGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 463 m
- To
- 468 m
- Intercept Depth
- 463 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:463-468
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.35 % copper is moderate against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 1.8 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.35”
Context: JDD002W1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JDD002W1Jukes · goldGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 463 m
- To
- 468 m
- Intercept Depth
- 463 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:463-468
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.08 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.08 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: JDD002W1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JDD002W1Jukes · silverGrade: 5.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 463 m
- To
- 468 m
- Intercept Depth
- 463 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:463-468
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.64 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 28.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.64 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.64”
Context: JDD002W1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JDD002W1Jukes · copperGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.34
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 489 m
- To
- 492 m
- Intercept Depth
- 489 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:489-492
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.34 % copper is moderate against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 1.0 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.34”
Context: JDD002W1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JDD002W1Jukes · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 489 m
- To
- 492 m
- Intercept Depth
- 489 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:489-492
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.09 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: JDD002W1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JDD002W1Jukes · silverGrade: 1.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JDD002W1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.67
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 489 m
- To
- 492 m
- Intercept Depth
- 489 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JDD002W1:489-492
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.67 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.67 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.67”
Context: JDD002W1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JP1Jukes · copperGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JP1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.41
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 100 m
- To
- 104 m
- Intercept Depth
- 100 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JP1:100-104
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.42
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.41 % copper is moderate against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 1.6 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.41”
Context: JP1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JP1Jukes · goldGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JP1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.005
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 100 m
- To
- 104 m
- Intercept Depth
- 100 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JP1:100-104
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.42
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.005 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.005 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.005”
Context: JP1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JP1Jukes · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JP1
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 100 m
- To
- 104 m
- Intercept Depth
- 100 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JP1:100-104
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.42
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: JP1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JP2Jukes · copperGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JP2
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 13.4 m
- From
- 61.6 m
- To
- 75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 61.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JP2:61.6-75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.76
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.6 % copper is exceptional against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 21.4 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.6 % copper is exceptional on the iocg deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: JP2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JP2Jukes · goldGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JP2
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.4 m
- From
- 61.6 m
- To
- 75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 61.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JP2:61.6-75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.76
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.6 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 21.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: JP2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JP2Jukes · silverGrade: 5.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JP2
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.4 m
- From
- 61.6 m
- To
- 75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 61.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JP2:61.6-75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.76
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 71.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.3”
Context: JP2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JP2Jukes · copperGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JP2
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 18.3 m
- From
- 140 m
- To
- 158.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 140 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JP2:140-158.3
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.18 % copper is below against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 3.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.18 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.2 %) on the iocg deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: JP2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JP3Jukes · copperGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: %Intercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JP3
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.52
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 214 m
- To
- 234 m
- Intercept Depth
- 214 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JP3:214-234
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.58
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.52 % copper is strong against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 10.4 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.52 % copper is strong on the iocg deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.52”
Context: JP3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JP3Jukes · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JP3
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 214 m
- To
- 234 m
- Intercept Depth
- 214 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JP3:214-234
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.58
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.06 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: JP3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JP3Jukes · silverGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JP3
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 214 m
- To
- 234 m
- Intercept Depth
- 214 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JP3:214-234
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.58
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 40.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: JP3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JP3Jukes · copperGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JP3
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.67
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 13 m
- From
- 215 m
- To
- 228 m
- Intercept Depth
- 215 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JP3:215-228
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.74
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.67 % copper is strong against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 8.7 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.67 % copper is strong on the iocg deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.67”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JP3Jukes · goldGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JP3
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13 m
- From
- 215 m
- To
- 228 m
- Intercept Depth
- 215 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JP3:215-228
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.74
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.08 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.08 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JP3Jukes · silverGrade: 2.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JP3
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13 m
- From
- 215 m
- To
- 228 m
- Intercept Depth
- 215 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JP3:215-228
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.74
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.38 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 30.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.38 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.38”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JP3Jukes · copperGrade: 2.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JP3
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.45
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 252 m
- To
- 253 m
- Intercept Depth
- 252 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JP3:252-253
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.53
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.45 % copper is exceptional against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 2.5 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.45 % copper is exceptional on the iocg deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.45”
Context: JP3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JP3Jukes · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JP3
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 252 m
- To
- 253 m
- Intercept Depth
- 252 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JP3:252-253
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.53
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: JP3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JP3Jukes · silverGrade: 10Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JP3
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 10
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 252 m
- To
- 253 m
- Intercept Depth
- 252 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JP3:252-253
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.53
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 10 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10”
Context: JP3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JP3Jukes · copperGrade: 2.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JP3
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.33
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 266 m
- To
- 268 m
- Intercept Depth
- 266 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JP3:266-268
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.33 % copper is exceptional against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 2.3 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.33 % copper is exceptional on the iocg deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.33”
Context: JP3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JP3Jukes · goldGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JP3
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.005
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 266 m
- To
- 268 m
- Intercept Depth
- 266 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JP3:266-268
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.005 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.005 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.005”
Context: JP3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JP3Jukes · silverGrade: 3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JP3
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 266 m
- To
- 268 m
- Intercept Depth
- 266 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JP3:266-268
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3”
Context: JP3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JP3Jukes · copperGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JP3
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 273 m
- To
- 305 m
- Intercept Depth
- 273 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JP3:273-305
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.33
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.28 % copper is weak against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 9.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.28”
Context: JP3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JP3Jukes · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JP3
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 273 m
- To
- 305 m
- Intercept Depth
- 273 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JP3:273-305
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.33
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.06 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: JP3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JP3Jukes · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JP3
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 273 m
- To
- 305 m
- Intercept Depth
- 273 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JP3:273-305
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.33
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 32.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: JP3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JP4Jukes · copperGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JP4
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 25 m
- From
- 191.5 m
- To
- 216.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 191.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JP4:191.5-216.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.33
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.28 % copper is weak against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 7.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.28”
Context: JP4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JP4Jukes · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JP4
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 25 m
- From
- 191.5 m
- To
- 216.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 191.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JP4:191.5-216.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.33
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.06 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: JP4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JP4Jukes · silverGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- JP4
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 25 m
- From
- 191.5 m
- To
- 216.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 191.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- JP4:191.5-216.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.33
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 17.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.7”
Context: JP4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Z142003Jukes · copperGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Z142003
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.59
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 139.2 m
- To
- 145.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 139.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Z142003:139.2-145.2
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.61
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.59 % copper is strong against the iocg deposit band [0.9, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2] %. Grade×width 3.5 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.59 % copper is strong on the iocg deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.59”
Context: Z142003
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Z142003Jukes · goldGrade: 0.005Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Z142003
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.005
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 139.2 m
- To
- 145.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 139.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Z142003:139.2-145.2
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.61
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.005 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.005 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.005”
Context: Z142003
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Z142003Jukes · silverGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Z142003
- Project
- Jukes
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- CPER
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 139.2 m
- To
- 145.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 139.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- iocg
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Z142003:139.2-145.2
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.61
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 16.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.7”
Context: Z142003
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.