# Crossroads Gold Identifies Strong Gold-Antimony Soil Anomalies Including Gold-In-Soil Values up to 4.5 g/t Au at Steiglitz Gold Project in Victoria, Australia Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/crossroads-gold-identifies-strong-gold-antimony-soil-anomalies-including-gold-in--bf3b20dd-d473-4e89-a39c-9c3a56c463e6 Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/CRG/news/7499233703356138/crossroads-gold-identifies-strong-gold-antimony-soil-anomalies-including-gold-in Publisher: tmx Original announcement: 2026-05-14T12:00:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: Unknown date Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date - Company: Crossroads Gold Corp. - Ticker: CRG - Exchange: TSX - Region: Victoria, Australia - Primary commodity: Gold - Secondary commodities: Antimony, Arsenic - Document categories: Drill results, Other - Extracted: 2026-09-13 18:48:32 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.80 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Crossroads Gold has reported strong gold-in-soil anomalies at the Steiglitz Gold Project in Victoria, Australia, with values peaking at 4.5 g/t Au. The results show a significant correlation between gold, antimony, and arsenic along the Hanover Fault Zone, supporting the potential for a large-scale epizonal system. Reasoning: Strong surface geochemical anomalies \(up to 4.5 g/t Au\) and pathfinder elements \(Sb, As\) suggest significant underlying mineralization potential in a known district. - Positive factor: High-grade soil anomalies \(4.5 g/t Au\) - Positive factor: Coincident gold-antimony-arsenic signatures - Positive factor: Discovery potential in a known gold-antimony district - Positive factor: Validation of structural targets \(Hanover Fault Zone\) - Negative factor: Results are from surface soil sampling, not bedrock drilling - Negative factor: Some high-grade areas are near historical mining profiles Facts used in scoring: 3 ## Classification and evidence **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: Release mentions specific assay methods \(fire assay, ICP-OES, AAS\) and a named laboratory \(Onsite Laboratory Services\). Evidence · text > submitted to Onsite Laboratory Services in Bendigo. Samples were dried, crushed and pulverized in preparation for 25-gram sample charge fire assay with an ICP-OES finish **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: The company highlights the proximity to world-class deposits like Fosterville and Sunday Creek to support the project's potential. Evidence · text > These pathfinder signatures are characteristic of several of Victoria's most significant recent discoveries, including Agnico-Eagle's Fosterville ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 3. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Drill Results (3) ### Fact 1 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/crossroads-gold-identifies-strong-gold-antimony-soil-anomalies-including-gold-in--bf3b20dd-d473-4e89-a39c-9c3a56c463e6#fact-drill-facts-0) Steiglitz Gold Project · gold #### Identity - Project: Steiglitz Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: australia\_vic - Reported Region: Victoria, Australia - Ticker: CRG #### Geometry - Grade: 4.5 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Onsite Laboratory Services - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: fire assay, ICP-OES, AAS #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No - Deleterious Elements: antimony, arsenic #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: 4.5 g/t Au in soil is a very strong geochemical signal for underlying mineralization. - Positive factor: Exceptionally high grade for soil sampling - Negative factor: Surface sample only Evidence · text > Soil samples assayed as high as 4,500 ppb \(4.5 g/t\) gold #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### Fact 2 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/crossroads-gold-identifies-strong-gold-antimony-soil-anomalies-including-gold-in--bf3b20dd-d473-4e89-a39c-9c3a56c463e6#fact-drill-facts-1) Steiglitz Gold Project · gold #### Identity - Project: Steiglitz Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: australia\_vic - Reported Region: Victoria, Australia - Ticker: CRG #### Geometry - Grade: 1.02 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Onsite Laboratory Services - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: fire assay, ICP-OES, AAS #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No - Deleterious Elements: antimony, arsenic #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Solid gold-in-soil grade supporting the prospect area. - Positive factor: Supports broad mineralization area Evidence · text > At Hanover No. 1, gold-in-soil assays peaked at 1,022 ppb gold \(1.02 g/t Au\) #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### STG05 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/crossroads-gold-identifies-strong-gold-antimony-soil-anomalies-including-gold-in--bf3b20dd-d473-4e89-a39c-9c3a56c463e6#fact-drill-facts-2) Steiglitz · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: STG05 - Project: Steiglitz - Commodity: gold - Region: australia\_vic - Reported Region: australia\_vic - Ticker: CRG #### Geometry - Grade: 0.41 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 47 m - From: 66 m - To: 113 m - Intercept Depth: 66 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: STG05:66-113 #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical drill result that appears to have missed the high-grade target due to orientation. - Positive factor: Significant width - Negative factor: Low grade - Negative factor: Likely drilled down the side of the zone Evidence · text > Previous drilling by the former project owner intersected 47 m @ 0.41 g/t Au from 66 meters \(STG05\) #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.