# Crossroads Gold Preparing to Drill Pambula Goldfield for the First Time in 46 Years Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/crossroads-gold-preparing-to-drill-pambula-goldfield-for-the-first-time-in-46-ye--41464fd4-d87a-4d2a-b1fd-a4a257a7ea24 Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/CRG/news/8214125057936969/crossroads-gold-preparing-to-drill-pambula-goldfield-for-the-first-time-in-46-ye Publisher: tmx Original announcement: 2026-06-30T14:20:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: Unknown date Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date - Company: Crossroads Gold - Ticker: CRG - Exchange: TSX - Region: New South Wales, Australia - Primary commodity: Gold - Secondary commodities: Silver, Antimony - Document categories: Drill results, Other - Extracted: 2026-09-13 18:37:32 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.60 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Crossroads Gold is preparing for a maiden drill program at the Pambula Gold Project in New South Wales, following a comprehensive review of historical mining and geological data. The company aims to target deep, structurally controlled sulphide-hosted gold mineralization that was previously overlooked by shallow exploration. Reasoning: The company is preparing for its first drill program in 46 years at Pambula, leveraging historical high-grade data and modern structural modeling to target deep sulphide-hosted gold. - Positive factor: maiden drill program preparation - Positive factor: historical high-grade intercepts - Positive factor: district-scale potential - Positive factor: sulphide-hosted mineralization targets - Negative factor: historical data is old - Negative factor: permitting still pending forest permit Facts used in scoring: 2 ## Classification and evidence **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: The release mentions a Qualified Person \(Rex Motton\) reviewed and approved the technical information. Evidence · text > reviewed and approved by Mr. Neil \(Rex\) Motton, who is a "Qualified Person" **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: The company is targeting a district-scale system based on historical mining and proximity to known structures. Evidence · text > Pambula is emerging as a compelling district-scale gold system ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Drill Results (2) ### DDH-P7 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/crossroads-gold-preparing-to-drill-pambula-goldfield-for-the-first-time-in-46-ye--41464fd4-d87a-4d2a-b1fd-a4a257a7ea24#fact-drill-facts-0) structurally controlled hydrothermal · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: DDH-P7 - Project: structurally controlled hydrothermal - Commodity: gold - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: australia\_nsw - Ticker: CRG #### Geometry - Grade: 2.36 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 16 m - From: 94 m - To: 110 m - Intercept Depth: 94 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: DDH-P7:94-110 #### QA/QC - QA/QC Methods: standards #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical intercept of 16m at 2.36 g/t Au. - Positive factor: continuous mineralization - Negative factor: historical data Evidence · text > hole DDH-P7 returning 16m at 2.36 g/t Au from 94m #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### DDH-P7 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/crossroads-gold-preparing-to-drill-pambula-goldfield-for-the-first-time-in-46-ye--41464fd4-d87a-4d2a-b1fd-a4a257a7ea24#fact-drill-facts-1) structurally controlled hydrothermal · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: DDH-P7 - Project: structurally controlled hydrothermal - Commodity: gold - Region: australia\_nsw - Reported Region: australia\_nsw - Ticker: CRG #### Geometry - Grade: 6.62 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 5 m - From: 94 m - To: 99 m - Intercept Depth: 94 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: DDH-P7:94-99 #### QA/QC - QA/QC Methods: standards #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: High-grade sub-interval within DDH-P7. - Positive factor: high-grade sub-interval - Negative factor: historical data Evidence · text > including 5m at 6.62 g/t Au #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.