Daura Gold Intersects High-Grade Gold & Silver Mineralization and Confirms Large Epithermal System from Phase One Drilling at Cerro Bayo

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Daura Gold Corp.
Ticker
DGC
Exchange
TSX
Region
Santa Cruz Province, Argentina
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-17 19:06:53 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Daura Gold Corp. announced high-grade gold and silver drill results from its Phase One program at the Cerro Bayo project in Argentina, confirming a large epithermal system. Key intercepts include 16.35m at 1.72 g/t AuEq and 3.60m at 6.08 g/t AuEq, with a high-grade silver interval of 1.8m at 739 g/t Ag. The company plans Phase Two step-out drilling to further explore the system.

Reasoning: The Phase One drill program at Cerro Bayo returned multiple high-grade gold and silver intercepts, confirming the presence of a large epithermal system with both shallow bulk-tonnage potential and higher-grade feeder structures. This is a significant positive for a first-pass exploration program, although the lack of true width information and reliance on assumed recoveries for AuEq calculations introduce some uncertainty.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold and silver intercepts
  • Confirmation of a large epithermal system
  • Broad zones of near-surface mineralization
  • First-pass drilling validating geological model
  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • True widths not known for reported intercepts
  • Metal equivalent assumptions based on arbitrary prices and assumed recoveries without metallurgical test work

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 82

Classification and evidence

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that 'Intersect lengths are recorded core lengths as true widths are not known at this time.'

Evidence · text

“Intersect lengths are recorded core lengths as true widths are not known at this time.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release details QA/QC procedures including sample preparation, assay methods, use of field duplicates, blanks, and Certified Reference Material (CRM) standards, and review by an independent consultant.

Evidence · text

“The internal quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) program included the submission of 10% quality control materials including field duplicates, blanks and Certified Reference Material (CRM) standards.”

QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Stuart Mills, M.Sc., is named as the Qualified Person who reviewed, verified, and approved the scientific and technical information in the news release.

Evidence · text

“Stuart Mills, M.Sc., is the Company's qualified person as defined by National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects and has reviewed, verified and approved the scientific and technical information that forms the basis for portions of this news release.”

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: The gold equivalent calculation uses assumed recoveries and arbitrary prices, and explicitly states 'there is no metallurgical test work to date'.

Evidence · text

“Assumes a recovery of 80% Ag and 100% Au given the project is early stage and there is no metallurgical test work to date. † Ag conversion uses a factor of 66, based on conservative, arbitrary Au & Ag prices, plus reduced Ag recoveries”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The Phase Two drilling program is described as envisaging 'step-out drilling from Phase One target tests and preliminary drill testing of recently generated targets'.

Evidence · text

“Phase Two drilling at Cerro Bayo envisages step-out drilling from Phase One target tests and preliminary drill testing of recently generated targets”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 82. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (82)

CBD26-001areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 0.063Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-001
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.063
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.75 m
From
16 m
To
19.75 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-001:16-19.75
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.05
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade over a narrow width, which is not particularly material on its own, especially with only apparent width reported.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Low grade

Evidence · table

“0.063”

Context: 3.75

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-001areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 31.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-001
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
31.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.75 m
From
16 m
To
19.75 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-001:16-19.75
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.05
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver intercept is at the lower end of the weak grade tier for silver, and over a narrow width, making it less material.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Weak grade

Evidence · table

“31.5”

Context: 3.75

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-001areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 0.369Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-001
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.369
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.35 m
From
28.85 m
To
45.2 m
Intercept Depth
28.85 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-001:28.85-45.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.72
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall mineralization but not standing out as high-grade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate width

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Weak grade

Evidence · table

“0.369”

Context: 16.35

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-001areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-001
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
89
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.35 m
From
28.85 m
To
45.2 m
Intercept Depth
28.85 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-001:28.85-45.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.72
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a moderate width, indicating significant silver mineralization in this zone.

Positive factors

  • Moderate width
  • Moderate grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“89.0”

Context: 16.35

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-001areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 1.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-001
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
1.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.6 m
From
36.05 m
To
39.65 m
Intercept Depth
36.05 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-001:36.05-39.65
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a strong gold grade over a narrow width, indicating a high-grade zone within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.430”

Context: 3.60

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-001areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 321.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-001
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
321.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.6 m
From
36.05 m
To
39.65 m
Intercept Depth
36.05 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-001:36.05-39.65
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong silver grade over a narrow width, highlighting a high-grade silver component within the mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“321.7”

Context: 3.60

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-005areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 0.037Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-005
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.037
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14 m
From
0 m
To
14 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-005:0-14
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.05
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low gold grade over a moderate width, indicating minor gold mineralization near surface.

Positive factors

  • Moderate width

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Very low grade

Evidence · table

“0.037”

Context: 14

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-005areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 30.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-005
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
30.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14 m
From
0 m
To
14 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-005:0-14
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.05
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver grade over a moderate width, indicating some near-surface silver mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Moderate width

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Weak grade

Evidence · table

“30.7”

Context: 14

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-005areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-005
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.25 m
From
15.95 m
To
17.2 m
Intercept Depth
15.95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-005:15.95-17.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a very low gold grade over a very narrow width, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Very low grade

Evidence · table

“0.100”

Context: 1.25

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-005areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 30.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-005
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
30.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.25 m
From
15.95 m
To
17.2 m
Intercept Depth
15.95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-005:15.95-17.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver intercept is at the lower end of the weak grade tier over a very narrow width, making it less material.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Weak grade

Evidence · table

“30.7”

Context: 1.25

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-005areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-005
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.95 m
From
23 m
To
24.95 m
Intercept Depth
23 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-005:23-24.95
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization but not highly material.

Positive factors

  • Weak grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow width

Evidence · table

“0.330”

Context: 1.95

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-005areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 15.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-005
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
15.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.95 m
From
23 m
To
24.95 m
Intercept Depth
23 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-005:23-24.95
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver grade is very low over a narrow width, indicating minor silver mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Very low grade

Evidence · table

“15.2”

Context: 1.95

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-005areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 0.092Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-005
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.092
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.5 m
From
30.6 m
To
34.1 m
Intercept Depth
30.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-005:30.6-34.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a very low gold grade over a narrow width, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Very low grade

Evidence · table

“0.092”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-005areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-005
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.5 m
From
30.6 m
To
34.1 m
Intercept Depth
30.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-005:30.6-34.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver grade over a narrow width, indicating some silver mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Weak grade

Evidence · table

“46.0”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-005areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 0.074Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-005
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.074
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15 m
From
58.7 m
To
73.7 m
Intercept Depth
58.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-005:58.7-73.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low gold grade over a moderate width, indicating minor gold mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Moderate width

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Very low grade

Evidence · table

“0.074”

Context: 15

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-005areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 120.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-005
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
120.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15 m
From
58.7 m
To
73.7 m
Intercept Depth
58.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-005:58.7-73.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a moderate width, indicating significant silver mineralization in this zone.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade
  • Moderate width

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“120.8”

Context: 15

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-005areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-005
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
63.7 m
To
65.7 m
Intercept Depth
63.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-005:63.7-65.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a very low gold grade over a narrow width, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Very low grade

Evidence · table

“0.110”

Context: 2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-005areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 427.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-005
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
427.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
63.7 m
To
65.7 m
Intercept Depth
63.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-005:63.7-65.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong silver grade over a narrow width, indicating a high-grade silver component within the mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“427.4”

Context: 2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-005areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-005
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.7 m
From
68.3 m
To
70 m
Intercept Depth
68.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-005:68.3-70
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.99
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a very low gold grade over a very narrow width, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Very low grade

Evidence · table

“0.160”

Context: 1.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-005areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 120.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-005
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
120.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.7 m
From
68.3 m
To
70 m
Intercept Depth
68.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-005:68.3-70
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.99
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a narrow width, indicating some silver mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow width

Evidence · table

“120.72”

Context: 1.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-005areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 0.175Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-005
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.175
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.6 m
From
86.4 m
To
90 m
Intercept Depth
86.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-005:86.4-90
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.08
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a very low gold grade over a narrow width, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Very low grade

Evidence · table

“0.175”

Context: 3.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-005areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 389.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-005
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
389.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.6 m
From
86.4 m
To
90 m
Intercept Depth
86.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-005:86.4-90
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.08
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong silver grade over a narrow width, indicating a high-grade silver component within the mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“389.8”

Context: 3.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-005areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-005
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.8 m
From
86.4 m
To
88.2 m
Intercept Depth
86.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-005:86.4-88.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
11.53
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a very narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization but not highly material.

Positive factors

  • Weak grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow width

Evidence · table

“0.330”

Context: 1.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-005areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 739.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-005
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
739.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.8 m
From
86.4 m
To
88.2 m
Intercept Depth
86.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-005:86.4-88.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
11.53
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is an exceptional silver grade over a narrow width, representing a bonanza intercept and a very high-grade silver component.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade
  • Bonanza Intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“739.53”

Context: 1.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-010Cerro Bayo · goldGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-010
Project
Cerro Bayo
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.3 m
From
30.25 m
To
30.55 m
Intercept Depth
30.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-010:30.25-30.55
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a very narrow width, making it of limited significance.

Positive factors

  • Weak grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Very narrow width

Evidence · table

“0.430”

Context: 0.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-010Cerro Bayo · silverGrade: 13.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-010
Project
Cerro Bayo
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
13.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.3 m
From
30.25 m
To
30.55 m
Intercept Depth
30.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-010:30.25-30.55
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver grade is very low over a very narrow width, indicating negligible silver mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Very low grade

Evidence · table

“13.4”

Context: 0.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-010Cerro Bayo · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-010
Project
Cerro Bayo
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.15 m
From
34.6 m
To
35.75 m
Intercept Depth
34.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-010:34.6-35.75
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a very low gold grade over a very narrow width, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Very low grade

Evidence · table

“0.070”

Context: 1.15

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-010Cerro Bayo · silverGrade: 47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-010
Project
Cerro Bayo
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.15 m
From
34.6 m
To
35.75 m
Intercept Depth
34.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-010:34.6-35.75
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver grade over a very narrow width, indicating some silver mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Weak grade

Evidence · table

“47.0”

Context: 1.15

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-011Cerro Bayo · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-011
Project
Cerro Bayo
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.75 m
From
103 m
To
103.75 m
Intercept Depth
103 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-011:103-103.75
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a very narrow width, making it of limited significance.

Positive factors

  • Weak grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Very narrow width

Evidence · table

“0.600”

Context: 0.75

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-011Cerro Bayo · silverGrade: 39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-011
Project
Cerro Bayo
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.75 m
From
103 m
To
103.75 m
Intercept Depth
103 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-011:103-103.75
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver grade over a very narrow width, indicating minor silver mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Weak grade

Evidence · table

“39.0”

Context: 0.75

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-012Cerro Bayo · goldGrade: 0.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-012
Project
Cerro Bayo
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.66
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
From
3.1 m
To
4.3 m
Intercept Depth
3.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-012:3.1-4.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a very narrow width, making it of limited significance.

Positive factors

  • Weak grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Very narrow width

Evidence · table

“0.660”

Context: 1.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-012Cerro Bayo · silverGrade: 5.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-012
Project
Cerro Bayo
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
5.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
From
3.1 m
To
4.3 m
Intercept Depth
3.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-012:3.1-4.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver grade is very low over a very narrow width, indicating negligible silver mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Very low grade

Evidence · table

“5.6”

Context: 1.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-012Cerro Bayo · goldGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-012
Project
Cerro Bayo
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11.95 m
From
11.45 m
To
23.4 m
Intercept Depth
11.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-012:11.45-23.4
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a moderate width, indicating significant gold mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade
  • Moderate width

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“2.000”

Context: 11.95

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-012Cerro Bayo · silverGrade: 6.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-012
Project
Cerro Bayo
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
6.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11.95 m
From
11.45 m
To
23.4 m
Intercept Depth
11.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-012:11.45-23.4
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver grade is very low over a moderate width, indicating negligible silver mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Very low grade

Evidence · table

“6.8”

Context: 11.95

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-012Cerro Bayo · goldGrade: 8.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-012
Project
Cerro Bayo
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
8.83
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.95 m
From
17.15 m
To
19.1 m
Intercept Depth
17.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-012:17.15-19.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.12
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is an exceptional gold grade over a narrow width, representing a bonanza intercept and a very high-grade gold component.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade
  • Bonanza Intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“8.83”

Context: 1.95

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-012Cerro Bayo · silverGrade: 18.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-012
Project
Cerro Bayo
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
18.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.95 m
From
17.15 m
To
19.1 m
Intercept Depth
17.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-012:17.15-19.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.12
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver grade is very low over a narrow width, indicating negligible silver mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Very low grade

Evidence · table

“18.86”

Context: 1.95

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-012Cerro Bayo · goldGrade: 1.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-012
Project
Cerro Bayo
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
1.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
From
22.5 m
To
23.4 m
Intercept Depth
22.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-012:22.5-23.4
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a very narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization but not highly material.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Very narrow width

Evidence · table

“1.210”

Context: 0.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-012Cerro Bayo · silverGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-012
Project
Cerro Bayo
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
2.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
From
22.5 m
To
23.4 m
Intercept Depth
22.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-012:22.5-23.4
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver grade is very low over a very narrow width, indicating negligible silver mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Very low grade

Evidence · table

“2.7”

Context: 0.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-012Cerro Bayo · goldGrade: 0.526Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-012
Project
Cerro Bayo
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.526
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.55 m
From
33.3 m
To
35.85 m
Intercept Depth
33.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-012:33.3-35.85
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization but not highly material.

Positive factors

  • Weak grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow width

Evidence · table

“0.526”

Context: 2.55

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-012Cerro Bayo · goldGrade: 1.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-012
Project
Cerro Bayo
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
1.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.25 m
From
67.75 m
To
68 m
Intercept Depth
67.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-012:67.75-68
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a very narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization but not highly material.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Very narrow width

Evidence · table

“1.020”

Context: 0.25

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-015Cerro Bayo · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-015
Project
Cerro Bayo
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.2 m
From
75.8 m
To
76 m
Intercept Depth
75.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-015:75.8-76
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a very low gold grade over a very narrow width, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Very low grade

Evidence · table

“0.140”

Context: 0.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-015Cerro Bayo · silverGrade: 165Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-015
Project
Cerro Bayo
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
165
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.2 m
From
75.8 m
To
76 m
Intercept Depth
75.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-015:75.8-76
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a very narrow width, indicating some silver mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Very narrow width

Evidence · table

“165.0”

Context: 0.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-015Cerro Bayo · goldGrade: 0.063Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-015
Project
Cerro Bayo
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.063
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.55 m
From
114.8 m
To
117.35 m
Intercept Depth
114.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-015:114.8-117.35
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a very low gold grade over a narrow width, contributing minimally to the overall prospectivity.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Very low grade

Evidence · table

“0.063”

Context: 2.55

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-015Cerro Bayo · silverGrade: 32.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-015
Project
Cerro Bayo
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
32.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.55 m
From
114.8 m
To
117.35 m
Intercept Depth
114.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-015:114.8-117.35
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver grade over a narrow width, indicating minor silver mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Weak grade

Evidence · table

“32.6”

Context: 2.55

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-017Cerro Bayo · goldGrade: 1.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-017
Project
Cerro Bayo
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
1.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.35 m
From
24 m
To
24.35 m
Intercept Depth
24 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-017:24-24.35
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a very narrow width, indicating a high-grade zone but with limited extent.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Very narrow width

Evidence · table

“1.460”

Context: 0.35

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-017Cerro Bayo · silverGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-017
Project
Cerro Bayo
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
4.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.35 m
From
24 m
To
24.35 m
Intercept Depth
24 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-017:24-24.35
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver grade is very low over a very narrow width, indicating negligible silver mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Very low grade

Evidence · table

“4.5”

Context: 0.35

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-018Cerro Bayo · goldGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-018
Project
Cerro Bayo
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.95 m
From
69.2 m
To
70.15 m
Intercept Depth
69.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-018:69.2-70.15
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a very narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization but not highly material.

Positive factors

  • Weak grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Very narrow width

Evidence · table

“0.470”

Context: 0.95

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 0.369Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.369
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.35 m
From
28.85 m
To
45.2 m
Intercept Depth
28.85 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:28.85-45.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.369 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.369”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
89
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.35 m
From
28.85 m
To
45.2 m
Intercept Depth
28.85 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:28.85-45.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 89 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1455.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“89.0”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 1.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
1.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.6 m
From
36.05 m
To
39.65 m
Intercept Depth
36.05 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:36.05-39.65
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.43 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.430”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 321.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
321.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.6 m
From
36.05 m
To
39.65 m
Intercept Depth
36.05 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:36.05-39.65
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 321.7 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1158.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 321.7 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“321.7”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.25 m
From
15.95 m
To
17.2 m
Intercept Depth
15.95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:15.95-17.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.100”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 30.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
30.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.25 m
From
15.95 m
To
17.2 m
Intercept Depth
15.95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:15.95-17.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 30.7 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 38.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“30.7”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.95 m
From
23 m
To
24.95 m
Intercept Depth
23 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:23-24.95
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.33 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.330”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 15.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
15.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.95 m
From
23 m
To
24.95 m
Intercept Depth
23 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:23-24.95
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 29.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 15.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“15.2”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 0.092Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.092
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.5 m
From
30.6 m
To
34.1 m
Intercept Depth
30.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:30.6-34.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.092 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.092 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.092”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.5 m
From
30.6 m
To
34.1 m
Intercept Depth
30.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:30.6-34.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 46 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 161.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“46.0”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 0.074Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.074
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15 m
From
58.7 m
To
73.7 m
Intercept Depth
58.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:58.7-73.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.074 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.074 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.074”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 120.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
120.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15 m
From
58.7 m
To
73.7 m
Intercept Depth
58.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:58.7-73.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 120.8 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1812.0 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“120.8”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
63.7 m
To
65.7 m
Intercept Depth
63.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:63.7-65.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.11 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.110”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 427.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
427.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
63.7 m
To
65.7 m
Intercept Depth
63.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:63.7-65.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 427.4 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 854.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 427.4 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“427.4”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.7 m
From
68.3 m
To
70 m
Intercept Depth
68.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:68.3-70
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.16 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.16 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.160”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 120.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
120.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.7 m
From
68.3 m
To
70 m
Intercept Depth
68.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:68.3-70
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 120.72 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 205.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“120.72”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 0.175Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.175
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.6 m
From
86.4 m
To
90 m
Intercept Depth
86.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:86.4-90
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.175 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.175 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.175”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 389.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
389.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.6 m
From
86.4 m
To
90 m
Intercept Depth
86.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:86.4-90
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 389.8 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1403.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 389.8 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“389.8”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.8 m
From
86.4 m
To
88.2 m
Intercept Depth
86.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:86.4-88.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.33 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.330”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 739.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
739.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.8 m
From
86.4 m
To
88.2 m
Intercept Depth
86.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:86.4-88.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 739.53 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1331.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 739.53 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“739.53”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.15 m
From
34.6 m
To
35.75 m
Intercept Depth
34.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:34.6-35.75
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.07 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.070”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.15 m
From
34.6 m
To
35.75 m
Intercept Depth
34.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:34.6-35.75
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 47 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 54.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“47.0”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11.95 m
From
11.45 m
To
23.4 m
Intercept Depth
11.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:11.45-23.4
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 23.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 2 g/t gold is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.000”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 6.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
6.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11.95 m
From
11.45 m
To
23.4 m
Intercept Depth
11.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:11.45-23.4
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 81.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 6.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.8”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 8.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
8.83
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.95 m
From
17.15 m
To
19.1 m
Intercept Depth
17.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:17.15-19.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.83 g/t gold is exceptional against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 17.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 8.83 g/t gold is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.83”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 18.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
18.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.95 m
From
17.15 m
To
19.1 m
Intercept Depth
17.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:17.15-19.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.86 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 36.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 18.86 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“18.86”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 1.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
1.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
From
22.5 m
To
23.4 m
Intercept Depth
22.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:22.5-23.4
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.21 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.210”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
2.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
From
22.5 m
To
23.4 m
Intercept Depth
22.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:22.5-23.4
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.7”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 0.526Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.526
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.55 m
From
33.3 m
To
35.85 m
Intercept Depth
33.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:33.3-35.85
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.526 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.526”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.55 m
From
33.3 m
To
35.85 m
Intercept Depth
33.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:33.3-35.85
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 1.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
1.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.25 m
From
67.75 m
To
68 m
Intercept Depth
67.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:67.75-68
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.02 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.020”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.25 m
From
67.75 m
To
68 m
Intercept Depth
67.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:67.75-68
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · goldGrade: 0.063Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0.063
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.55 m
From
114.8 m
To
117.35 m
Intercept Depth
114.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:114.8-117.35
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.063 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.063 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.063”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andareas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal · silverGrade: 32.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
areas supports the presence of a large and well-developed epithermal
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
32.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.55 m
From
114.8 m
To
117.35 m
Intercept Depth
114.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:114.8-117.35
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 32.6 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 83.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“32.6”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CBD26-018Cerro Bayo · silverGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CBD26-018
Project
Cerro Bayo
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
DGC

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.95 m
From
69.2 m
To
70.15 m
Intercept Depth
69.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CBD26-018:69.2-70.15
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: CBD26-018

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.