Decade Discusses Update on Nobody Knows Property Exploration
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Decade Resources Ltd
- Ticker
- DEC
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- British Columbia
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Bismuth, Arsenic, Cobalt, Tellurium
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-15 19:06:44 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Decade Resources Ltd. announced high-grade gold, silver, and base metal grab sample results from its Nobody Knows property in British Columbia. The samples, some of which are historical re-releases, show significant polymetallic mineralization with high arsenic and bismuth values, consistent with an intrusive-related gold deposit model. The company plans further exploration, including drilling, to locate the source of these mineralized boulders.
Reasoning: Decade Resources reported high-grade gold, silver, and base metal grab samples from a new discovery on its Nobody Knows property, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization. While the samples are selective and historical, the company's plans for further exploration and drilling to locate the source are positive. However, high arsenic values present a potential processing challenge.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic mineralization
- Discovery of new mineralization
- Plans for follow-up exploration and drilling
- QA/QC procedures disclosed
Negative factors
- Samples are selective grab samples, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Source of mineralization not yet located
- High arsenic values indicate potential deleterious elements
- Results are re-releases of historical data
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 132
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 132. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (132)
24-Jn-1Nobody Knows · goldGrade: 40.24Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-1
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 40.24
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 40.24 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (40.24 g/t) well above the bonanza threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“40.24”
Context: 24-Jn-1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-1Nobody Knows · silverGrade: 108Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-1
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 108
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a strong silver grade of 108 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade (108 g/t) above the moderate threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“108”
Context: 24-Jn-1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-1Nobody Knows · copperGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-1
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.86
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a strong copper grade of 0.86%, which is above the 75th percentile for similar deposit types, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Strong copper grade (0.86%) above the porphyry strong threshold and 75th percentile for similar deposits
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.86”
Context: 24-Jn-1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-1Nobody Knows · leadGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-1
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak lead grade of 0.11%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Lead grade (0.11%) is below the weak threshold
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: 24-Jn-1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-1Nobody Knows · zincGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-1
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.65
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak zinc grade of 0.65%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Zinc grade (0.65%) is below the weak threshold
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.65”
Context: 24-Jn-1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-1Nobody Knows · bismuthGrade: 106.89Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-1
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- bismuth
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 106.89
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high bismuth value of 106.89 ppm, indicating a deleterious element that could impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- High bismuth value (106.89 ppm) indicates the presence of a deleterious element, which could pose processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“106.89”
Context: 24-Jn-1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-1Nobody Knows · arsenicGrade: 10000Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-1
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 10000
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“>10000”
Context: 24-Jn-1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-1Nobody Knows · cobaltGrade: 226.6Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-1
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 226.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an elevated cobalt value of 226.6 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Elevated cobalt value (226.6 ppm) as a potential byproduct
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“226.6”
Context: 24-Jn-1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-2Nobody Knows · goldGrade: 28.62Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-2
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 28.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 28.62 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (28.62 g/t) well above the bonanza threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“28.62”
Context: 24-Jn-2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-2Nobody Knows · silverGrade: 58.99Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-2
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 58.99
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate silver grade of 58.99 g/t, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade (58.99 g/t) above the weak threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“58.99”
Context: 24-Jn-2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-2Nobody Knows · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-2
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate copper grade of 0.3%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Moderate copper grade (0.3%) above the porphyry moderate threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: 24-Jn-2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-2Nobody Knows · leadGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-2
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak lead grade of 0.08%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Lead grade (0.08%) is below the weak threshold
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: 24-Jn-2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-2Nobody Knows · zincGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-2
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.55
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak zinc grade of 0.55%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Zinc grade (0.55%) is below the weak threshold
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.55”
Context: 24-Jn-2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-2Nobody Knows · bismuthGrade: 47.09Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-2
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- bismuth
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 47.09
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high bismuth value of 47.09 ppm, indicating a deleterious element that could impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- High bismuth value (47.09 ppm) indicates the presence of a deleterious element, which could pose processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“47.09”
Context: 24-Jn-2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-2Nobody Knows · arsenicGrade: 10000Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-2
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 10000
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“>10000”
Context: 24-Jn-2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-2Nobody Knows · cobaltGrade: 150.2Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-2
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 150.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an elevated cobalt value of 150.2 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Elevated cobalt value (150.2 ppm) as a potential byproduct
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“150.2”
Context: 24-Jn-2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-3Nobody Knows · goldGrade: 39.03Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-3
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 39.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 39.03 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (39.03 g/t) well above the bonanza threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“39.03”
Context: 24-Jn-3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-3Nobody Knows · silverGrade: 169Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-3
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 169
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a strong silver grade of 169 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade (169 g/t) above the moderate threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“169”
Context: 24-Jn-3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-3Nobody Knows · copperGrade: 1.226Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-3
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.226
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional copper grade of 1.226%, which is well above the 75th percentile for similar deposit types, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade (1.226%) well above the porphyry strong threshold and 75th percentile for similar deposits
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“1.226”
Context: 24-Jn-3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-3Nobody Knows · leadGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-3
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak lead grade of 0.12%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Lead grade (0.12%) is below the weak threshold
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: 24-Jn-3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-3Nobody Knows · zincGrade: 0.74Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-3
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.74
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak zinc grade of 0.74%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Zinc grade (0.74%) is below the weak threshold
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.74”
Context: 24-Jn-3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-3Nobody Knows · bismuthGrade: 186.09Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-3
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- bismuth
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 186.09
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high bismuth value of 186.09 ppm, indicating a deleterious element that could impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- High bismuth value (186.09 ppm) indicates the presence of a deleterious element, which could pose processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“186.09”
Context: 24-Jn-3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-3Nobody Knows · arsenicGrade: 10000Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-3
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 10000
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“>10000”
Context: 24-Jn-3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-3Nobody Knows · cobaltGrade: 187.7Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-3
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 187.7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an elevated cobalt value of 187.7 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Elevated cobalt value (187.7 ppm) as a potential byproduct
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“187.7”
Context: 24-Jn-3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-4Nobody Knows · goldGrade: 17.043Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-4
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.043
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 17.043 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (17.043 g/t) well above the bonanza threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“17.043”
Context: 24-Jn-4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-4Nobody Knows · silverGrade: 927Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-4
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 927
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional silver grade of 927 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver grade (927 g/t) well above the bonanza threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“927”
Context: 24-Jn-4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-4Nobody Knows · copperGrade: 2.32Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-4
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.32
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional copper grade of 2.32%, which is well above the 75th percentile for similar deposit types, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade (2.32%) well above the porphyry exceptional threshold and 75th percentile for similar deposits
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“2.32”
Context: 24-Jn-4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-4Nobody Knows · leadGrade: 7.93Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-4
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.93
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a strong lead grade of 7.93%, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Strong lead grade (7.93%) above the moderate threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“7.93”
Context: 24-Jn-4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-4Nobody Knows · zincGrade: 27.15Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-4
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 27.15
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional zinc grade of 27.15%, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Exceptional zinc grade (27.15%) well above the bonanza threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“27.15”
Context: 24-Jn-4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-4Nobody Knows · bismuthGrade: 1673.05Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-4
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- bismuth
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1673.05
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high bismuth value of 1673.05 ppm, indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Extremely high bismuth value (1673.05 ppm) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“1673.05”
Context: 24-Jn-4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-4Nobody Knows · arsenicGrade: 10000Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-4
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 10000
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“>10000”
Context: 24-Jn-4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-4Nobody Knows · cobaltGrade: 616Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-4
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 616
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high cobalt value of 616 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- High cobalt value (616 ppm) as a potential byproduct
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“616”
Context: 24-Jn-4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-5Nobody Knows · goldGrade: 79.12Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-5
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 79.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 79.12 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (79.12 g/t) well above the bonanza threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“79.12”
Context: 24-Jn-5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-5Nobody Knows · silverGrade: 690Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-5
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 690
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional silver grade of 690 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver grade (690 g/t) well above the bonanza threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“690”
Context: 24-Jn-5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-5Nobody Knows · copperGrade: 2.192Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-5
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.192
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional copper grade of 2.192%, which is well above the 75th percentile for similar deposit types, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade (2.192%) well above the porphyry exceptional threshold and 75th percentile for similar deposits
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“2.192”
Context: 24-Jn-5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-5Nobody Knows · leadGrade: 3.27Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-5
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.27
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate lead grade of 3.27%, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Moderate lead grade (3.27%) above the moderate threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“3.27”
Context: 24-Jn-5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-5Nobody Knows · zincGrade: 14.22Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-5
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.22
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a strong zinc grade of 14.22%, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Strong zinc grade (14.22%) above the moderate threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“14.22”
Context: 24-Jn-5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-5Nobody Knows · bismuthGrade: 688.39Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-5
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- bismuth
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 688.39
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high bismuth value of 688.39 ppm, indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Extremely high bismuth value (688.39 ppm) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“688.39”
Context: 24-Jn-5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-5Nobody Knows · arsenicGrade: 10000Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-5
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 10000
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“>10000”
Context: 24-Jn-5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-5Nobody Knows · cobaltGrade: 356.4Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-5
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 356.4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high cobalt value of 356.4 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- High cobalt value (356.4 ppm) as a potential byproduct
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“356.4”
Context: 24-Jn-5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-6Nobody Knows · goldGrade: 19.33Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-6
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 19.33 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (19.33 g/t) well above the bonanza threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“19.33”
Context: 24-Jn-6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-6Nobody Knows · silverGrade: 99.39Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-6
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 99.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate silver grade of 99.39 g/t, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade (99.39 g/t) above the weak threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“99.39”
Context: 24-Jn-6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-6Nobody Knows · copperGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-6
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate copper grade of 0.5%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Moderate copper grade (0.5%) above the porphyry moderate threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: 24-Jn-6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-6Nobody Knows · leadGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-6
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak lead grade of 0.11%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Lead grade (0.11%) is below the weak threshold
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: 24-Jn-6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-6Nobody Knows · zincGrade: 2.08Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-6
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.08
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak zinc grade of 2.08%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Weak zinc grade (2.08%) above the weak threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“2.08”
Context: 24-Jn-6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-6Nobody Knows · bismuthGrade: 99.91Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-6
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- bismuth
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 99.91
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high bismuth value of 99.91 ppm, indicating a deleterious element that could impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- High bismuth value (99.91 ppm) indicates the presence of a deleterious element, which could pose processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“99.91”
Context: 24-Jn-6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-6Nobody Knows · arsenicGrade: 10000Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-6
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 10000
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“>10000”
Context: 24-Jn-6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-6Nobody Knows · cobaltGrade: 79.9Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-6
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 79.9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an elevated cobalt value of 79.9 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Elevated cobalt value (79.9 ppm) as a potential byproduct
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“79.9”
Context: 24-Jn-6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-7Nobody Knows · goldGrade: 10.603Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-7
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.603
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 10.603 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (10.603 g/t) well above the bonanza threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“10.603”
Context: 24-Jn-7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-7Nobody Knows · silverGrade: 178Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-7
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 178
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a strong silver grade of 178 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade (178 g/t) above the moderate threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“178”
Context: 24-Jn-7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-7Nobody Knows · copperGrade: 1.119Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-7
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.119
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional copper grade of 1.119%, which is well above the 75th percentile for similar deposit types, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade (1.119%) well above the porphyry strong threshold and 75th percentile for similar deposits
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“1.119”
Context: 24-Jn-7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-7Nobody Knows · leadGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-7
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak lead grade of 0.9%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Weak lead grade (0.9%) above the weak threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.9”
Context: 24-Jn-7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-7Nobody Knows · zincGrade: 23.36Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-7
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.36
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional zinc grade of 23.36%, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Exceptional zinc grade (23.36%) well above the bonanza threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“23.36”
Context: 24-Jn-7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-7Nobody Knows · bismuthGrade: 193.99Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-7
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- bismuth
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 193.99
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high bismuth value of 193.99 ppm, indicating a deleterious element that could impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- High bismuth value (193.99 ppm) indicates the presence of a deleterious element, which could pose processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“193.99”
Context: 24-Jn-7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-7Nobody Knows · arsenicGrade: 10000Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-7
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 10000
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“>10000”
Context: 24-Jn-7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-7Nobody Knows · cobaltGrade: 154.9Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-7
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 154.9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an elevated cobalt value of 154.9 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Elevated cobalt value (154.9 ppm) as a potential byproduct
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“154.9”
Context: 24-Jn-7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-8Nobody Knows · goldGrade: 10.655Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-8
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.655
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 10.655 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (10.655 g/t) well above the bonanza threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“10.655”
Context: 24-Jn-8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-8Nobody Knows · silverGrade: 49.04Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-8
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 49.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak silver grade of 49.04 g/t, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Weak silver grade (49.04 g/t) above the weak threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“49.04”
Context: 24-Jn-8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-8Nobody Knows · copperGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-8
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak copper grade of 0.19%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Copper grade (0.19%) is below the porphyry weak threshold
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.19”
Context: 24-Jn-8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-8Nobody Knows · leadGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-8
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak lead grade of 0.18%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Lead grade (0.18%) is below the weak threshold
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: 24-Jn-8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-8Nobody Knows · zincGrade: 0.53Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-8
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.53
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak zinc grade of 0.53%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Zinc grade (0.53%) is below the weak threshold
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.53”
Context: 24-Jn-8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-8Nobody Knows · bismuthGrade: 49.05Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-8
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- bismuth
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 49.05
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high bismuth value of 49.05 ppm, indicating a deleterious element that could impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- High bismuth value (49.05 ppm) indicates the presence of a deleterious element, which could pose processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“49.05”
Context: 24-Jn-8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-8Nobody Knows · arsenicGrade: 10000Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-8
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 10000
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“>10000”
Context: 24-Jn-8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-8Nobody Knows · cobaltGrade: 82Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-8
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 82
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an elevated cobalt value of 82 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Elevated cobalt value (82 ppm) as a potential byproduct
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“82”
Context: 24-Jn-8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-9Nobody Knows · goldGrade: 0.185Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-9
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.185
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak gold grade of 0.185 g/t, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Gold grade (0.185 g/t) is below the weak threshold
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.185”
Context: 24-Jn-9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-9Nobody Knows · silverGrade: 3.35Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-9
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak silver grade of 3.35 g/t, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Silver grade (3.35 g/t) is below the weak threshold
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“3.35”
Context: 24-Jn-9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-9Nobody Knows · copperGrade: 0.043Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-9
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.043
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak copper grade of 0.043%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Copper grade (0.043%) is below the porphyry weak threshold
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.043”
Context: 24-Jn-9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-9Nobody Knows · leadGrade: 0.007Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-9
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.007
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak lead grade of 0.007%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Lead grade (0.007%) is below the weak threshold
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.007”
Context: 24-Jn-9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-9Nobody Knows · zincGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-9
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak zinc grade of 0.05%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Zinc grade (0.05%) is below the weak threshold
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 24-Jn-9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-9Nobody Knows · bismuthGrade: 3.69Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-9
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- bismuth
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.69
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows a low bismuth value of 3.69 ppm, indicating less concern for deleterious elements, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Bismuth value (3.69 ppm) is low, indicating less concern for deleterious elements
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“3.69”
Context: 24-Jn-9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-9Nobody Knows · arsenicGrade: 96.8Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-9
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 96.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows a low arsenic value of 96.8 ppm, indicating less concern for deleterious elements, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Arsenic value (96.8 ppm) is low, indicating less concern for deleterious elements
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“96.8”
Context: 24-Jn-9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-9Nobody Knows · cobaltGrade: 87.3Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-9
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 87.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an elevated cobalt value of 87.3 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Elevated cobalt value (87.3 ppm) as a potential byproduct
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“87.3”
Context: 24-Jn-9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-10Nobody Knows · goldGrade: 40.94Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-10
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 40.94
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 40.94 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (40.94 g/t) well above the bonanza threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“40.94”
Context: 24-Jn-10
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-10Nobody Knows · silverGrade: 142Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-10
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 142
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a strong silver grade of 142 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade (142 g/t) above the moderate threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“142”
Context: 24-Jn-10
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-10Nobody Knows · copperGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-10
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.41
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate copper grade of 0.41%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Moderate copper grade (0.41%) above the porphyry moderate threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.41”
Context: 24-Jn-10
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-10Nobody Knows · leadGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-10
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak lead grade of 0.11%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Lead grade (0.11%) is below the weak threshold
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: 24-Jn-10
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-10Nobody Knows · zincGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-10
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.73
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak zinc grade of 0.73%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Zinc grade (0.73%) is below the weak threshold
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.73”
Context: 24-Jn-10
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-10Nobody Knows · bismuthGrade: 185.37Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-10
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- bismuth
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 185.37
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high bismuth value of 185.37 ppm, indicating a deleterious element that could impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- High bismuth value (185.37 ppm) indicates the presence of a deleterious element, which could pose processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“185.37”
Context: 24-Jn-10
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-10Nobody Knows · arsenicGrade: 10000Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-10
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 10000
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“>10000”
Context: 24-Jn-10
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-10Nobody Knows · cobaltGrade: 223.8Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-10
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 223.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an elevated cobalt value of 223.8 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Elevated cobalt value (223.8 ppm) as a potential byproduct
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“223.8”
Context: 24-Jn-10
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-11Nobody Knows · goldGrade: 31.57Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-11
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 31.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 31.57 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (31.57 g/t) well above the bonanza threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“31.57”
Context: 24-Jn-11
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-11Nobody Knows · silverGrade: 96.23Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-11
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 96.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate silver grade of 96.23 g/t, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade (96.23 g/t) above the weak threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“96.23”
Context: 24-Jn-11
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-11Nobody Knows · copperGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-11
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.41
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate copper grade of 0.41%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Moderate copper grade (0.41%) above the porphyry moderate threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.41”
Context: 24-Jn-11
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-11Nobody Knows · leadGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-11
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.61
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak lead grade of 0.61%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Weak lead grade (0.61%) above the weak threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.61”
Context: 24-Jn-11
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-11Nobody Knows · zincGrade: 1.27Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-11
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.27
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak zinc grade of 1.27%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Zinc grade (1.27%) is below the weak threshold
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“1.27”
Context: 24-Jn-11
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-11Nobody Knows · bismuthGrade: 173Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-11
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- bismuth
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 173
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high bismuth value of 173 ppm, indicating a deleterious element that could impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- High bismuth value (173 ppm) indicates the presence of a deleterious element, which could pose processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“173”
Context: 24-Jn-11
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-11Nobody Knows · arsenicGrade: 10000Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-11
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 10000
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“>10000”
Context: 24-Jn-11
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-11Nobody Knows · cobaltGrade: 245.2Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-11
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 245.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an elevated cobalt value of 245.2 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Elevated cobalt value (245.2 ppm) as a potential byproduct
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“245.2”
Context: 24-Jn-11
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-12Nobody Knows · goldGrade: 34.27Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-12
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 34.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 34.27 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (34.27 g/t) well above the bonanza threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“34.27”
Context: 24-Jn-12
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-12Nobody Knows · silverGrade: 251Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-12
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 251
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a strong silver grade of 251 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade (251 g/t) above the moderate threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“251”
Context: 24-Jn-12
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-12Nobody Knows · copperGrade: 1.426Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-12
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.426
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional copper grade of 1.426%, which is well above the 75th percentile for similar deposit types, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade (1.426%) well above the porphyry strong threshold and 75th percentile for similar deposits
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“1.426”
Context: 24-Jn-12
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-12Nobody Knows · leadGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-12
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.23
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak lead grade of 0.23%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Lead grade (0.23%) is below the weak threshold
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.23”
Context: 24-Jn-12
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-12Nobody Knows · zincGrade: 3.87Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-12
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.87
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate zinc grade of 3.87%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Moderate zinc grade (3.87%) above the weak threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“3.87”
Context: 24-Jn-12
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-12Nobody Knows · bismuthGrade: 86.71Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-12
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- bismuth
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 86.71
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high bismuth value of 86.71 ppm, indicating a deleterious element that could impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- High bismuth value (86.71 ppm) indicates the presence of a deleterious element, which could pose processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“86.71”
Context: 24-Jn-12
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-12Nobody Knows · arsenicGrade: 10000Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-12
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 10000
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“>10000”
Context: 24-Jn-12
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-12Nobody Knows · cobaltGrade: 161.3Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-12
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 161.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an elevated cobalt value of 161.3 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Elevated cobalt value (161.3 ppm) as a potential byproduct
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“161.3”
Context: 24-Jn-12
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-13Nobody Knows · goldGrade: 9.517Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-13
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.517
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 9.517 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (9.517 g/t) well above the bonanza threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“9.517”
Context: 24-Jn-13
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-13Nobody Knows · silverGrade: 168Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-13
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 168
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a strong silver grade of 168 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade (168 g/t) above the moderate threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“168”
Context: 24-Jn-13
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-13Nobody Knows · copperGrade: 0.77Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-13
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.77
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a strong copper grade of 0.77%, which is above the 75th percentile for similar deposit types, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Strong copper grade (0.77%) above the porphyry strong threshold and 75th percentile for similar deposits
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.77”
Context: 24-Jn-13
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-13Nobody Knows · leadGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-13
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak lead grade of 0.25%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Lead grade (0.25%) is below the weak threshold
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.25”
Context: 24-Jn-13
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-13Nobody Knows · zincGrade: 4.33Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-13
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.33
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate zinc grade of 4.33%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Moderate zinc grade (4.33%) above the weak threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“4.33”
Context: 24-Jn-13
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-13Nobody Knows · bismuthGrade: 109.64Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-13
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- bismuth
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 109.64
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high bismuth value of 109.64 ppm, indicating a deleterious element that could impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- High bismuth value (109.64 ppm) indicates the presence of a deleterious element, which could pose processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“109.64”
Context: 24-Jn-13
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-13Nobody Knows · arsenicGrade: 10000Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-13
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 10000
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“>10000”
Context: 24-Jn-13
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-13Nobody Knows · cobaltGrade: 157.2Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-13
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 157.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an elevated cobalt value of 157.2 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Elevated cobalt value (157.2 ppm) as a potential byproduct
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“157.2”
Context: 24-Jn-13
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-14Nobody Knows · goldGrade: 36.59Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-14
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 36.59
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 36.59 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (36.59 g/t) well above the bonanza threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“36.59”
Context: 24-Jn-14
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-14Nobody Knows · silverGrade: 230Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-14
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 230
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a strong silver grade of 230 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade (230 g/t) above the moderate threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“230”
Context: 24-Jn-14
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-14Nobody Knows · copperGrade: 1.613Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-14
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.613
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional copper grade of 1.613%, which is well above the 75th percentile for similar deposit types, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade (1.613%) well above the porphyry exceptional threshold and 75th percentile for similar deposits
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“1.613”
Context: 24-Jn-14
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-14Nobody Knows · leadGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-14
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.32
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak lead grade of 0.32%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Lead grade (0.32%) is below the weak threshold
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.32”
Context: 24-Jn-14
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-14Nobody Knows · zincGrade: 4.2Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-14
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.2
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate zinc grade of 4.2%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Moderate zinc grade (4.2%) above the weak threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“4.2”
Context: 24-Jn-14
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-14Nobody Knows · bismuthGrade: 143.33Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-14
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- bismuth
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 143.33
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high bismuth value of 143.33 ppm, indicating a deleterious element that could impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- High bismuth value (143.33 ppm) indicates the presence of a deleterious element, which could pose processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“143.33”
Context: 24-Jn-14
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-14Nobody Knows · arsenicGrade: 10000Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-14
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 10000
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“>10000”
Context: 24-Jn-14
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-14Nobody Knows · cobaltGrade: 204.2Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-14
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 204.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an elevated cobalt value of 204.2 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Elevated cobalt value (204.2 ppm) as a potential byproduct
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“204.2”
Context: 24-Jn-14
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-15Nobody Knows · goldGrade: 50.82Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-15
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 50.82
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 50.82 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (50.82 g/t) well above the bonanza threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“50.82”
Context: 24-Jn-15
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-15Nobody Knows · silverGrade: 363Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-15
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 363
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a strong silver grade of 363 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade (363 g/t) above the moderate threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“363”
Context: 24-Jn-15
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-15Nobody Knows · copperGrade: 1.373Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-15
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.373
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional copper grade of 1.373%, which is well above the 75th percentile for similar deposit types, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade (1.373%) well above the porphyry strong threshold and 75th percentile for similar deposits
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“1.373”
Context: 24-Jn-15
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-15Nobody Knows · leadGrade: 2.02Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-15
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.02
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate lead grade of 2.02%, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Moderate lead grade (2.02%) above the moderate threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“2.02”
Context: 24-Jn-15
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-15Nobody Knows · zincGrade: 9.59Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-15
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.59
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a strong zinc grade of 9.59%, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Strong zinc grade (9.59%) above the moderate threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“9.59”
Context: 24-Jn-15
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-15Nobody Knows · bismuthGrade: 528.04Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-15
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- bismuth
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 528.04
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high bismuth value of 528.04 ppm, indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Extremely high bismuth value (528.04 ppm) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“528.04”
Context: 24-Jn-15
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-15Nobody Knows · arsenicGrade: 10000Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-15
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 10000
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“>10000”
Context: 24-Jn-15
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-15Nobody Knows · cobaltGrade: 289.7Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-15
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 289.7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high cobalt value of 289.7 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- High cobalt value (289.7 ppm) as a potential byproduct
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“289.7”
Context: 24-Jn-15
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-16Nobody Knows · goldGrade: 37.32Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-16
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 37.32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 37.32 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (37.32 g/t) well above the bonanza threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“37.32”
Context: 24-Jn-16
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-16Nobody Knows · silverGrade: 159Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-16
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 159
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a strong silver grade of 159 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade (159 g/t) above the moderate threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“159”
Context: 24-Jn-16
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-16Nobody Knows · copperGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-16
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate copper grade of 0.4%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Moderate copper grade (0.4%) above the porphyry moderate threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: 24-Jn-16
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-16Nobody Knows · leadGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-16
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak lead grade of 0.08%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Lead grade (0.08%) is below the weak threshold
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: 24-Jn-16
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-16Nobody Knows · zincGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-16
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak zinc grade of 0.18%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Zinc grade (0.18%) is below the weak threshold
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: 24-Jn-16
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-16Nobody Knows · bismuthGrade: 165.19Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-16
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- bismuth
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 165.19
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high bismuth value of 165.19 ppm, indicating a deleterious element that could impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- High bismuth value (165.19 ppm) indicates the presence of a deleterious element, which could pose processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“165.19”
Context: 24-Jn-16
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-16Nobody Knows · arsenicGrade: 10000Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-16
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 10000
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample.
Negative factors
- Extremely high arsenic value (>10000 ppm) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“>10000”
Context: 24-Jn-16
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
24-Jn-16Nobody Knows · cobaltGrade: 172.2Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24-Jn-16
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 172.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample shows an elevated cobalt value of 172.2 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Elevated cobalt value (172.2 ppm) as a potential byproduct
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“172.2”
Context: 24-Jn-16
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
25-GB-1Nobody Knows · goldGrade: 5.5231Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25-GB-1
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.5231
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-09-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 5.5231 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (5.5231 g/t) well above the bonanza threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“5.5231”
Context: 25-GB-1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
25-GB-1Nobody Knows · silverGrade: 88.48Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25-GB-1
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 88.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-09-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate silver grade of 88.48 g/t, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade (88.48 g/t) above the weak threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“88.48”
Context: 25-GB-1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
25-GB-1Nobody Knows · copperGrade: 0.325Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25-GB-1
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.325
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-09-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate copper grade of 0.325%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Moderate copper grade (0.325%) above the porphyry moderate threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.325”
Context: 25-GB-1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
25-GB-1Nobody Knows · leadGrade: 0.53Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25-GB-1
- Project
- Nobody Knows
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- DEC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.53
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- check_assays
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, bismuth, cobalt
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-09-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak lead grade of 0.53%, though it is a selective historical sample.
Positive factors
- Weak lead grade (0.53%) above the weak threshold
Negative factors
- Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Result is a re-release of historical data
Evidence · table
“0.53”
Context: 25-GB-1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.