# Decade Discusses Update on Nobody Knows Property Exploration Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/DEC/news/5961501975606273/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration Publisher: tmx Original announcement: 2026-01-12T13:00:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: Unknown date Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date - Company: Decade Resources Ltd - Ticker: DEC - Exchange: TSX - Region: British Columbia - Primary commodity: Gold - Secondary commodities: Silver, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Bismuth, Arsenic, Cobalt, Tellurium - Document categories: Drill results - Extracted: 2026-09-15 19:06:44 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.70 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Decade Resources Ltd. announced high-grade gold, silver, and base metal grab sample results from its Nobody Knows property in British Columbia. The samples, some of which are historical re-releases, show significant polymetallic mineralization with high arsenic and bismuth values, consistent with an intrusive-related gold deposit model. The company plans further exploration, including drilling, to locate the source of these mineralized boulders. Reasoning: Decade Resources reported high-grade gold, silver, and base metal grab samples from a new discovery on its Nobody Knows property, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization. While the samples are selective and historical, the company's plans for further exploration and drilling to locate the source are positive. However, high arsenic values present a potential processing challenge. - Positive factor: High-grade polymetallic mineralization - Positive factor: Discovery of new mineralization - Positive factor: Plans for follow-up exploration and drilling - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures disclosed - Negative factor: Samples are selective grab samples, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Source of mineralization not yet located - Negative factor: High arsenic values indicate potential deleterious elements - Negative factor: Results are re-releases of historical data Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source. Facts used in scoring: 132 ## Classification and evidence No classification tags are available. ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 132. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Drill Results (132) ### 24-Jn-1 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-0) Nobody Knows · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-1 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 40.24 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 40.24 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Exceptional gold grade \(40.24 g/t\) well above the bonanza threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 40.24 Context: 24-Jn-1 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-1 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-1) Nobody Knows · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-1 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 108 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a strong silver grade of 108 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Strong silver grade \(108 g/t\) above the moderate threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 108 Context: 24-Jn-1 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-1 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-2) Nobody Knows · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-1 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.86 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a strong copper grade of 0.86%, which is above the 75th percentile for similar deposit types, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Strong copper grade \(0.86%\) above the porphyry strong threshold and 75th percentile for similar deposits - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.86 Context: 24-Jn-1 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-1 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-3) Nobody Knows · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-1 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.11 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak lead grade of 0.11%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Lead grade \(0.11%\) is below the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.11 Context: 24-Jn-1 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-1 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-4) Nobody Knows · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-1 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.65 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak zinc grade of 0.65%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Zinc grade \(0.65%\) is below the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.65 Context: 24-Jn-1 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-1 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-5) Nobody Knows · bismuth Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-1 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: bismuth - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 106.89 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high bismuth value of 106.89 ppm, indicating a deleterious element that could impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: High bismuth value \(106.89 ppm\) indicates the presence of a deleterious element, which could pose processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 106.89 Context: 24-Jn-1 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-1 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-6) Nobody Knows · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-1 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: arsenic - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 10000 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > >10000 Context: 24-Jn-1 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-1 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-7) Nobody Knows · cobalt Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-1 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: cobalt - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 226.6 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an elevated cobalt value of 226.6 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Elevated cobalt value \(226.6 ppm\) as a potential byproduct - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 226.6 Context: 24-Jn-1 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-2 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-8) Nobody Knows · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-2 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 28.62 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 28.62 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Exceptional gold grade \(28.62 g/t\) well above the bonanza threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 28.62 Context: 24-Jn-2 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-2 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-9) Nobody Knows · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-2 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 58.99 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate silver grade of 58.99 g/t, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Moderate silver grade \(58.99 g/t\) above the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 58.99 Context: 24-Jn-2 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-2 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-10) Nobody Knows · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-2 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.3 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate copper grade of 0.3%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Moderate copper grade \(0.3%\) above the porphyry moderate threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.3 Context: 24-Jn-2 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-2 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-11) Nobody Knows · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-2 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.08 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak lead grade of 0.08%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Lead grade \(0.08%\) is below the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.08 Context: 24-Jn-2 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-2 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-12) Nobody Knows · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-2 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.55 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak zinc grade of 0.55%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Zinc grade \(0.55%\) is below the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.55 Context: 24-Jn-2 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-2 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-13) Nobody Knows · bismuth Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-2 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: bismuth - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 47.09 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high bismuth value of 47.09 ppm, indicating a deleterious element that could impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: High bismuth value \(47.09 ppm\) indicates the presence of a deleterious element, which could pose processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 47.09 Context: 24-Jn-2 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-2 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-14) Nobody Knows · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-2 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: arsenic - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 10000 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > >10000 Context: 24-Jn-2 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-2 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-15) Nobody Knows · cobalt Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-2 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: cobalt - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 150.2 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an elevated cobalt value of 150.2 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Elevated cobalt value \(150.2 ppm\) as a potential byproduct - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 150.2 Context: 24-Jn-2 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-3 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-16) Nobody Knows · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-3 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 39.03 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 39.03 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Exceptional gold grade \(39.03 g/t\) well above the bonanza threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 39.03 Context: 24-Jn-3 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-3 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-17) Nobody Knows · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-3 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 169 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a strong silver grade of 169 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Strong silver grade \(169 g/t\) above the moderate threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 169 Context: 24-Jn-3 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-3 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-18) Nobody Knows · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-3 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 1.226 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional copper grade of 1.226%, which is well above the 75th percentile for similar deposit types, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Exceptional copper grade \(1.226%\) well above the porphyry strong threshold and 75th percentile for similar deposits - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 1.226 Context: 24-Jn-3 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-3 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-19) Nobody Knows · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-3 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.12 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak lead grade of 0.12%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Lead grade \(0.12%\) is below the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.12 Context: 24-Jn-3 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-3 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-20) Nobody Knows · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-3 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.74 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak zinc grade of 0.74%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Zinc grade \(0.74%\) is below the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.74 Context: 24-Jn-3 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-3 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-21) Nobody Knows · bismuth Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-3 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: bismuth - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 186.09 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high bismuth value of 186.09 ppm, indicating a deleterious element that could impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: High bismuth value \(186.09 ppm\) indicates the presence of a deleterious element, which could pose processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 186.09 Context: 24-Jn-3 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-3 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-22) Nobody Knows · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-3 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: arsenic - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 10000 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > >10000 Context: 24-Jn-3 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-3 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-23) Nobody Knows · cobalt Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-3 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: cobalt - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 187.7 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an elevated cobalt value of 187.7 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Elevated cobalt value \(187.7 ppm\) as a potential byproduct - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 187.7 Context: 24-Jn-3 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-4 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-24) Nobody Knows · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-4 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 17.043 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 17.043 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Exceptional gold grade \(17.043 g/t\) well above the bonanza threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 17.043 Context: 24-Jn-4 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-4 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-25) Nobody Knows · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-4 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 927 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional silver grade of 927 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Exceptional silver grade \(927 g/t\) well above the bonanza threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 927 Context: 24-Jn-4 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-4 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-26) Nobody Knows · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-4 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 2.32 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional copper grade of 2.32%, which is well above the 75th percentile for similar deposit types, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Exceptional copper grade \(2.32%\) well above the porphyry exceptional threshold and 75th percentile for similar deposits - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 2.32 Context: 24-Jn-4 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-4 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-27) Nobody Knows · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-4 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 7.93 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a strong lead grade of 7.93%, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Strong lead grade \(7.93%\) above the moderate threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 7.93 Context: 24-Jn-4 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-4 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-28) Nobody Knows · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-4 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 27.15 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional zinc grade of 27.15%, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Exceptional zinc grade \(27.15%\) well above the bonanza threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 27.15 Context: 24-Jn-4 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-4 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-29) Nobody Knows · bismuth Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-4 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: bismuth - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 1673.05 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high bismuth value of 1673.05 ppm, indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Extremely high bismuth value \(1673.05 ppm\) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 1673.05 Context: 24-Jn-4 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-4 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-30) Nobody Knows · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-4 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: arsenic - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 10000 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > >10000 Context: 24-Jn-4 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-4 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-31) Nobody Knows · cobalt Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-4 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: cobalt - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 616 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high cobalt value of 616 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: High cobalt value \(616 ppm\) as a potential byproduct - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 616 Context: 24-Jn-4 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-5 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-32) Nobody Knows · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-5 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 79.12 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 79.12 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Exceptional gold grade \(79.12 g/t\) well above the bonanza threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 79.12 Context: 24-Jn-5 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-5 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-33) Nobody Knows · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-5 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 690 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional silver grade of 690 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Exceptional silver grade \(690 g/t\) well above the bonanza threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 690 Context: 24-Jn-5 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-5 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-34) Nobody Knows · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-5 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 2.192 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional copper grade of 2.192%, which is well above the 75th percentile for similar deposit types, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Exceptional copper grade \(2.192%\) well above the porphyry exceptional threshold and 75th percentile for similar deposits - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 2.192 Context: 24-Jn-5 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-5 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-35) Nobody Knows · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-5 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 3.27 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate lead grade of 3.27%, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Moderate lead grade \(3.27%\) above the moderate threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 3.27 Context: 24-Jn-5 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-5 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-36) Nobody Knows · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-5 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 14.22 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a strong zinc grade of 14.22%, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Strong zinc grade \(14.22%\) above the moderate threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 14.22 Context: 24-Jn-5 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-5 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-37) Nobody Knows · bismuth Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-5 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: bismuth - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 688.39 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high bismuth value of 688.39 ppm, indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Extremely high bismuth value \(688.39 ppm\) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 688.39 Context: 24-Jn-5 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-5 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-38) Nobody Knows · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-5 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: arsenic - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 10000 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > >10000 Context: 24-Jn-5 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-5 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-39) Nobody Knows · cobalt Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-5 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: cobalt - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 356.4 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high cobalt value of 356.4 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: High cobalt value \(356.4 ppm\) as a potential byproduct - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 356.4 Context: 24-Jn-5 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-6 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-40) Nobody Knows · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-6 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 19.33 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 19.33 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Exceptional gold grade \(19.33 g/t\) well above the bonanza threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 19.33 Context: 24-Jn-6 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-6 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-41) Nobody Knows · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-6 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 99.39 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate silver grade of 99.39 g/t, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Moderate silver grade \(99.39 g/t\) above the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 99.39 Context: 24-Jn-6 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-6 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-42) Nobody Knows · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-6 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.5 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate copper grade of 0.5%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Moderate copper grade \(0.5%\) above the porphyry moderate threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.5 Context: 24-Jn-6 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-6 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-43) Nobody Knows · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-6 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.11 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak lead grade of 0.11%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Lead grade \(0.11%\) is below the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.11 Context: 24-Jn-6 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-6 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-44) Nobody Knows · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-6 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 2.08 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak zinc grade of 2.08%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Weak zinc grade \(2.08%\) above the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 2.08 Context: 24-Jn-6 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-6 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-45) Nobody Knows · bismuth Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-6 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: bismuth - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 99.91 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high bismuth value of 99.91 ppm, indicating a deleterious element that could impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: High bismuth value \(99.91 ppm\) indicates the presence of a deleterious element, which could pose processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 99.91 Context: 24-Jn-6 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-6 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-46) Nobody Knows · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-6 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: arsenic - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 10000 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > >10000 Context: 24-Jn-6 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-6 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-47) Nobody Knows · cobalt Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-6 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: cobalt - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 79.9 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an elevated cobalt value of 79.9 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Elevated cobalt value \(79.9 ppm\) as a potential byproduct - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 79.9 Context: 24-Jn-6 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-7 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-48) Nobody Knows · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-7 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 10.603 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 10.603 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Exceptional gold grade \(10.603 g/t\) well above the bonanza threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 10.603 Context: 24-Jn-7 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-7 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-49) Nobody Knows · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-7 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 178 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a strong silver grade of 178 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Strong silver grade \(178 g/t\) above the moderate threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 178 Context: 24-Jn-7 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-7 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-50) Nobody Knows · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-7 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 1.119 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional copper grade of 1.119%, which is well above the 75th percentile for similar deposit types, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Exceptional copper grade \(1.119%\) well above the porphyry strong threshold and 75th percentile for similar deposits - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 1.119 Context: 24-Jn-7 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-7 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-51) Nobody Knows · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-7 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.9 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak lead grade of 0.9%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Weak lead grade \(0.9%\) above the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.9 Context: 24-Jn-7 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-7 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-52) Nobody Knows · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-7 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 23.36 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional zinc grade of 23.36%, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Exceptional zinc grade \(23.36%\) well above the bonanza threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 23.36 Context: 24-Jn-7 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-7 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-53) Nobody Knows · bismuth Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-7 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: bismuth - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 193.99 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high bismuth value of 193.99 ppm, indicating a deleterious element that could impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: High bismuth value \(193.99 ppm\) indicates the presence of a deleterious element, which could pose processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 193.99 Context: 24-Jn-7 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-7 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-54) Nobody Knows · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-7 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: arsenic - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 10000 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > >10000 Context: 24-Jn-7 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-7 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-55) Nobody Knows · cobalt Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-7 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: cobalt - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 154.9 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an elevated cobalt value of 154.9 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Elevated cobalt value \(154.9 ppm\) as a potential byproduct - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 154.9 Context: 24-Jn-7 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-8 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-56) Nobody Knows · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-8 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 10.655 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 10.655 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Exceptional gold grade \(10.655 g/t\) well above the bonanza threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 10.655 Context: 24-Jn-8 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-8 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-57) Nobody Knows · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-8 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 49.04 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak silver grade of 49.04 g/t, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Weak silver grade \(49.04 g/t\) above the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 49.04 Context: 24-Jn-8 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-8 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-58) Nobody Knows · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-8 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.19 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak copper grade of 0.19%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Copper grade \(0.19%\) is below the porphyry weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.19 Context: 24-Jn-8 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-8 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-59) Nobody Knows · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-8 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.18 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak lead grade of 0.18%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Lead grade \(0.18%\) is below the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.18 Context: 24-Jn-8 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-8 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-60) Nobody Knows · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-8 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.53 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak zinc grade of 0.53%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Zinc grade \(0.53%\) is below the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.53 Context: 24-Jn-8 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-8 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-61) Nobody Knows · bismuth Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-8 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: bismuth - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 49.05 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high bismuth value of 49.05 ppm, indicating a deleterious element that could impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: High bismuth value \(49.05 ppm\) indicates the presence of a deleterious element, which could pose processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 49.05 Context: 24-Jn-8 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-8 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-62) Nobody Knows · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-8 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: arsenic - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 10000 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > >10000 Context: 24-Jn-8 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-8 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-63) Nobody Knows · cobalt Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-8 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: cobalt - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 82 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an elevated cobalt value of 82 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Elevated cobalt value \(82 ppm\) as a potential byproduct - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 82 Context: 24-Jn-8 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-9 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-64) Nobody Knows · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-9 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.185 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak gold grade of 0.185 g/t, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Gold grade \(0.185 g/t\) is below the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.185 Context: 24-Jn-9 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-9 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-65) Nobody Knows · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-9 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 3.35 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak silver grade of 3.35 g/t, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Silver grade \(3.35 g/t\) is below the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 3.35 Context: 24-Jn-9 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-9 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-66) Nobody Knows · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-9 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.043 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak copper grade of 0.043%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Copper grade \(0.043%\) is below the porphyry weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.043 Context: 24-Jn-9 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-9 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-67) Nobody Knows · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-9 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.007 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak lead grade of 0.007%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Lead grade \(0.007%\) is below the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.007 Context: 24-Jn-9 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-9 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-68) Nobody Knows · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-9 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.05 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak zinc grade of 0.05%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Zinc grade \(0.05%\) is below the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.05 Context: 24-Jn-9 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-9 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-69) Nobody Knows · bismuth Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-9 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: bismuth - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 3.69 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows a low bismuth value of 3.69 ppm, indicating less concern for deleterious elements, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Bismuth value \(3.69 ppm\) is low, indicating less concern for deleterious elements - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 3.69 Context: 24-Jn-9 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-9 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-70) Nobody Knows · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-9 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: arsenic - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 96.8 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows a low arsenic value of 96.8 ppm, indicating less concern for deleterious elements, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Arsenic value \(96.8 ppm\) is low, indicating less concern for deleterious elements - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 96.8 Context: 24-Jn-9 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-9 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-71) Nobody Knows · cobalt Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-9 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: cobalt - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 87.3 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an elevated cobalt value of 87.3 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Elevated cobalt value \(87.3 ppm\) as a potential byproduct - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 87.3 Context: 24-Jn-9 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-10 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-72) Nobody Knows · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-10 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 40.94 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 40.94 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Exceptional gold grade \(40.94 g/t\) well above the bonanza threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 40.94 Context: 24-Jn-10 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-10 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-73) Nobody Knows · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-10 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 142 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a strong silver grade of 142 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Strong silver grade \(142 g/t\) above the moderate threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 142 Context: 24-Jn-10 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-10 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-74) Nobody Knows · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-10 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.41 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate copper grade of 0.41%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Moderate copper grade \(0.41%\) above the porphyry moderate threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.41 Context: 24-Jn-10 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-10 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-75) Nobody Knows · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-10 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.11 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak lead grade of 0.11%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Lead grade \(0.11%\) is below the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.11 Context: 24-Jn-10 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-10 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-76) Nobody Knows · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-10 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.73 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak zinc grade of 0.73%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Zinc grade \(0.73%\) is below the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.73 Context: 24-Jn-10 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-10 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-77) Nobody Knows · bismuth Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-10 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: bismuth - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 185.37 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high bismuth value of 185.37 ppm, indicating a deleterious element that could impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: High bismuth value \(185.37 ppm\) indicates the presence of a deleterious element, which could pose processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 185.37 Context: 24-Jn-10 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-10 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-78) Nobody Knows · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-10 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: arsenic - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 10000 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > >10000 Context: 24-Jn-10 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-10 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-79) Nobody Knows · cobalt Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-10 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: cobalt - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 223.8 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an elevated cobalt value of 223.8 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Elevated cobalt value \(223.8 ppm\) as a potential byproduct - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 223.8 Context: 24-Jn-10 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-11 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-80) Nobody Knows · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-11 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 31.57 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 31.57 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Exceptional gold grade \(31.57 g/t\) well above the bonanza threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 31.57 Context: 24-Jn-11 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-11 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-81) Nobody Knows · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-11 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 96.23 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate silver grade of 96.23 g/t, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Moderate silver grade \(96.23 g/t\) above the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 96.23 Context: 24-Jn-11 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-11 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-82) Nobody Knows · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-11 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.41 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate copper grade of 0.41%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Moderate copper grade \(0.41%\) above the porphyry moderate threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.41 Context: 24-Jn-11 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-11 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-83) Nobody Knows · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-11 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.61 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak lead grade of 0.61%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Weak lead grade \(0.61%\) above the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.61 Context: 24-Jn-11 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-11 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-84) Nobody Knows · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-11 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 1.27 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak zinc grade of 1.27%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Zinc grade \(1.27%\) is below the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 1.27 Context: 24-Jn-11 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-11 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-85) Nobody Knows · bismuth Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-11 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: bismuth - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 173 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high bismuth value of 173 ppm, indicating a deleterious element that could impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: High bismuth value \(173 ppm\) indicates the presence of a deleterious element, which could pose processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 173 Context: 24-Jn-11 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-11 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-86) Nobody Knows · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-11 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: arsenic - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 10000 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > >10000 Context: 24-Jn-11 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-11 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-87) Nobody Knows · cobalt Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-11 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: cobalt - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 245.2 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an elevated cobalt value of 245.2 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Elevated cobalt value \(245.2 ppm\) as a potential byproduct - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 245.2 Context: 24-Jn-11 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-12 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-88) Nobody Knows · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-12 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 34.27 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 34.27 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Exceptional gold grade \(34.27 g/t\) well above the bonanza threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 34.27 Context: 24-Jn-12 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-12 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-89) Nobody Knows · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-12 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 251 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a strong silver grade of 251 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Strong silver grade \(251 g/t\) above the moderate threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 251 Context: 24-Jn-12 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-12 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-90) Nobody Knows · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-12 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 1.426 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional copper grade of 1.426%, which is well above the 75th percentile for similar deposit types, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Exceptional copper grade \(1.426%\) well above the porphyry strong threshold and 75th percentile for similar deposits - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 1.426 Context: 24-Jn-12 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-12 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-91) Nobody Knows · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-12 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.23 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak lead grade of 0.23%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Lead grade \(0.23%\) is below the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.23 Context: 24-Jn-12 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-12 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-92) Nobody Knows · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-12 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 3.87 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate zinc grade of 3.87%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Moderate zinc grade \(3.87%\) above the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 3.87 Context: 24-Jn-12 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-12 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-93) Nobody Knows · bismuth Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-12 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: bismuth - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 86.71 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high bismuth value of 86.71 ppm, indicating a deleterious element that could impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: High bismuth value \(86.71 ppm\) indicates the presence of a deleterious element, which could pose processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 86.71 Context: 24-Jn-12 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-12 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-94) Nobody Knows · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-12 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: arsenic - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 10000 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > >10000 Context: 24-Jn-12 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-12 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-95) Nobody Knows · cobalt Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-12 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: cobalt - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 161.3 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an elevated cobalt value of 161.3 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Elevated cobalt value \(161.3 ppm\) as a potential byproduct - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 161.3 Context: 24-Jn-12 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-13 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-96) Nobody Knows · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-13 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 9.517 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 9.517 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Exceptional gold grade \(9.517 g/t\) well above the bonanza threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 9.517 Context: 24-Jn-13 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-13 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-97) Nobody Knows · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-13 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 168 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a strong silver grade of 168 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Strong silver grade \(168 g/t\) above the moderate threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 168 Context: 24-Jn-13 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-13 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-98) Nobody Knows · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-13 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.77 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a strong copper grade of 0.77%, which is above the 75th percentile for similar deposit types, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Strong copper grade \(0.77%\) above the porphyry strong threshold and 75th percentile for similar deposits - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.77 Context: 24-Jn-13 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-13 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-99) Nobody Knows · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-13 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.25 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak lead grade of 0.25%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Lead grade \(0.25%\) is below the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.25 Context: 24-Jn-13 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-13 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-100) Nobody Knows · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-13 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 4.33 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate zinc grade of 4.33%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Moderate zinc grade \(4.33%\) above the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 4.33 Context: 24-Jn-13 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-13 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-101) Nobody Knows · bismuth Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-13 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: bismuth - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 109.64 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high bismuth value of 109.64 ppm, indicating a deleterious element that could impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: High bismuth value \(109.64 ppm\) indicates the presence of a deleterious element, which could pose processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 109.64 Context: 24-Jn-13 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-13 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-102) Nobody Knows · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-13 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: arsenic - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 10000 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > >10000 Context: 24-Jn-13 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-13 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-103) Nobody Knows · cobalt Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-13 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: cobalt - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 157.2 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an elevated cobalt value of 157.2 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Elevated cobalt value \(157.2 ppm\) as a potential byproduct - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 157.2 Context: 24-Jn-13 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-14 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-104) Nobody Knows · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-14 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 36.59 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 36.59 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Exceptional gold grade \(36.59 g/t\) well above the bonanza threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 36.59 Context: 24-Jn-14 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-14 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-105) Nobody Knows · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-14 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 230 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a strong silver grade of 230 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Strong silver grade \(230 g/t\) above the moderate threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 230 Context: 24-Jn-14 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-14 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-106) Nobody Knows · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-14 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 1.613 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional copper grade of 1.613%, which is well above the 75th percentile for similar deposit types, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Exceptional copper grade \(1.613%\) well above the porphyry exceptional threshold and 75th percentile for similar deposits - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 1.613 Context: 24-Jn-14 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-14 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-107) Nobody Knows · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-14 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.32 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak lead grade of 0.32%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Lead grade \(0.32%\) is below the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.32 Context: 24-Jn-14 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-14 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-108) Nobody Knows · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-14 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 4.2 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate zinc grade of 4.2%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Moderate zinc grade \(4.2%\) above the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 4.2 Context: 24-Jn-14 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-14 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-109) Nobody Knows · bismuth Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-14 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: bismuth - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 143.33 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high bismuth value of 143.33 ppm, indicating a deleterious element that could impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: High bismuth value \(143.33 ppm\) indicates the presence of a deleterious element, which could pose processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 143.33 Context: 24-Jn-14 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-14 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-110) Nobody Knows · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-14 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: arsenic - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 10000 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > >10000 Context: 24-Jn-14 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-14 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-111) Nobody Knows · cobalt Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-14 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: cobalt - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 204.2 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an elevated cobalt value of 204.2 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Elevated cobalt value \(204.2 ppm\) as a potential byproduct - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 204.2 Context: 24-Jn-14 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-15 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-112) Nobody Knows · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-15 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 50.82 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 50.82 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Exceptional gold grade \(50.82 g/t\) well above the bonanza threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 50.82 Context: 24-Jn-15 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-15 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-113) Nobody Knows · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-15 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 363 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a strong silver grade of 363 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Strong silver grade \(363 g/t\) above the moderate threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 363 Context: 24-Jn-15 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-15 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-114) Nobody Knows · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-15 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 1.373 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional copper grade of 1.373%, which is well above the 75th percentile for similar deposit types, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Exceptional copper grade \(1.373%\) well above the porphyry strong threshold and 75th percentile for similar deposits - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 1.373 Context: 24-Jn-15 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-15 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-115) Nobody Knows · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-15 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 2.02 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate lead grade of 2.02%, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Moderate lead grade \(2.02%\) above the moderate threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 2.02 Context: 24-Jn-15 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-15 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-116) Nobody Knows · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-15 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 9.59 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a strong zinc grade of 9.59%, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Strong zinc grade \(9.59%\) above the moderate threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 9.59 Context: 24-Jn-15 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-15 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-117) Nobody Knows · bismuth Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-15 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: bismuth - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 528.04 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high bismuth value of 528.04 ppm, indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Extremely high bismuth value \(528.04 ppm\) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 528.04 Context: 24-Jn-15 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-15 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-118) Nobody Knows · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-15 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: arsenic - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 10000 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > >10000 Context: 24-Jn-15 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-15 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-119) Nobody Knows · cobalt Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-15 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: cobalt - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 289.7 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high cobalt value of 289.7 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: High cobalt value \(289.7 ppm\) as a potential byproduct - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 289.7 Context: 24-Jn-15 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-16 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-120) Nobody Knows · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-16 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 37.32 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 37.32 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Exceptional gold grade \(37.32 g/t\) well above the bonanza threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 37.32 Context: 24-Jn-16 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-16 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-121) Nobody Knows · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-16 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 159 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a strong silver grade of 159 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Strong silver grade \(159 g/t\) above the moderate threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 159 Context: 24-Jn-16 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-16 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-122) Nobody Knows · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-16 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.4 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate copper grade of 0.4%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Moderate copper grade \(0.4%\) above the porphyry moderate threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.4 Context: 24-Jn-16 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-16 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-123) Nobody Knows · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-16 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.08 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak lead grade of 0.08%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Lead grade \(0.08%\) is below the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.08 Context: 24-Jn-16 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-16 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-124) Nobody Knows · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-16 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.18 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak zinc grade of 0.18%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Zinc grade \(0.18%\) is below the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.18 Context: 24-Jn-16 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-16 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-125) Nobody Knows · bismuth Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-16 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: bismuth - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 165.19 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows a high bismuth value of 165.19 ppm, indicating a deleterious element that could impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: High bismuth value \(165.19 ppm\) indicates the presence of a deleterious element, which could pose processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 165.19 Context: 24-Jn-16 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-16 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-126) Nobody Knows · arsenic Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-16 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: arsenic - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 10000 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\), indicating a significant deleterious element that could severely impact processing, though it is a selective historical sample. - Negative factor: Extremely high arsenic value \(>10000 ppm\) indicates the presence of a significant deleterious element, which could pose severe processing challenges - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > >10000 Context: 24-Jn-16 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 24-Jn-16 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-127) Nobody Knows · cobalt Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 24-Jn-16 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: cobalt - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 172.2 - Grade Unit: ppm #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-08-06T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample shows an elevated cobalt value of 172.2 ppm, indicating potential byproduct credit, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Elevated cobalt value \(172.2 ppm\) as a potential byproduct - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 172.2 Context: 24-Jn-16 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 25-GB-1 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-128) Nobody Knows · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 25-GB-1 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 5.5231 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2025-09-25T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned an exceptional gold grade of 5.5231 g/t, indicating significant mineralization, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Exceptional gold grade \(5.5231 g/t\) well above the bonanza threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 5.5231 Context: 25-GB-1 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 25-GB-1 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-129) Nobody Knows · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 25-GB-1 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 88.48 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2025-09-25T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate silver grade of 88.48 g/t, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Moderate silver grade \(88.48 g/t\) above the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 88.48 Context: 25-GB-1 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 25-GB-1 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-130) Nobody Knows · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 25-GB-1 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.325 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2025-09-25T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a moderate copper grade of 0.325%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Moderate copper grade \(0.325%\) above the porphyry moderate threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.325 Context: 25-GB-1 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### 25-GB-1 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/decade-discusses-update-on-nobody-knows-property-exploration--2242cdf1-5bf4-4507-ab33-c2433bbe104a#fact-drill-facts-131) Nobody Knows · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 25-GB-1 - Project: Nobody Knows - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DEC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.53 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Deposit Type: other - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - Laboratory: MSA Labs - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: check\_assays #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: Yes - Deleterious Elements: arsenic, bismuth, cobalt #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2025-09-25T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This grab sample returned a weak lead grade of 0.53%, though it is a selective historical sample. - Positive factor: Weak lead grade \(0.53%\) above the weak threshold - Negative factor: Sample is selective grab sample, not representative of in-situ mineralization - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data Evidence · table > 0.53 Context: 25-GB-1 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Deleterious Elements Present** Polarity: negative Definition: A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent. Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.