Deep Semi Massive Sulphide Zinc, Silver and Gold Intersection at Berrigan Property

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Chibougamau Independent Mines Inc.
Ticker
CBG
Exchange
TSX
Region
Quebec
Primary commodity
Zinc
Secondary commodities
Silver, Gold, Copper
Document categories
Drill results, Other
Extracted
2026-09-17 15:19:00 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Chibougamau Independent Mines Inc. has reported high-grade drill results from the Berrigan property in Quebec, discovering a new semi-massive sulphide zone named Berrigan Deep. Intercepts include up to 41.79% ZnEq and 28.69% ZnEq, with mineralization remaining open at depth.

Reasoning: The announcement reports high-grade zinc-equivalent intercepts (up to 41.79% ZnEq) that define a new semi-massive sulphide zone, representing a significant exploration discovery.

Positive factors

  • High-grade semi-massive sulphide intercepts
  • Discovery of new major zone (Berrigan Deep)
  • Mineralization remains open at depth
  • Significant secondary gold and silver

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only (true width not explicitly stated)
  • No metallurgical data available
  • No QA/QC disclosure in text

Facts used in scoring: 61

Classification and evidence

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The results highlight a new semi-massive sulfide zone that extends at depth beneath known zones.

Evidence · text

“highlights a new semi-massive sulfide zone that extends at depth beneath the known zones”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The release states true width is estimated as 80-85% of core length rather than providing specific true widths.

Evidence · text

“True width is estimated to be approximately 80-85% of the core length”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: The document does not disclose specific QA/QC protocols, blanks, or standards used.

Evidence · text

“The Company is currently in the initial exploration phase”

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The 41.79% ZnEq intercept is exceptionally high for a zinc project.

Evidence · table

“41.79”

Context: 1.40

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 61. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (61)

TOM-25-014Berrigan · zincGrade: 45509Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
45509
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2.1 m
From
185 m
To
187.1 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:185-187.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.73
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional ZnEq grade over a short interval.

Positive factors

  • Very high grade ZnEq

Evidence · table

“28.69”

Context: 2.10

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan · zincGrade: 5.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 98.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
5.75
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
98.5 m
From
451.2 m
To
549.7 m
Intercept Depth
451.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:451.2-549.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.34
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Massive intercept defining a new zone.

Positive factors

  • Large width at significant grade
  • Discovery of new zone

Evidence · text

“5.75% ZnEq (1.34 g/t AuEq) over 98.5 m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan · zincGrade: 47876Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
47876
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.9 m
From
452.2 m
To
457.1 m
Intercept Depth
451.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:452.2-457.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.26
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High grade inclusion within the larger intercept.

Positive factors

  • High grade intercept

Evidence · table

“26.67”

Context: 4.90

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · goldGrade: 4.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
4.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.1 m
From
185 m
To
187.1 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:185-187.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
28.69
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.94 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 10.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 4.94 g/t gold is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.94”

Context: TOM-25-014

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · silverGrade: 56.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
56.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.1 m
From
185 m
To
187.1 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:185-187.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
28.69
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 56.44 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 118.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“56.44”

Context: TOM-25-014

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · copperGrade: 545Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
545
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2.1 m
From
185 m
To
187.1 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:185-187.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
28.69
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 545 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“545”

Context: TOM-25-014

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · goldGrade: 2.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
2.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.15 m
From
238.7 m
To
239.85 m
Intercept Depth
238.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:238.7-239.85
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
23.29
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.63 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 2.63 g/t gold is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.63”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · silverGrade: 22.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
22.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.15 m
From
238.7 m
To
239.85 m
Intercept Depth
238.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:238.7-239.85
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
23.29
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 25.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 22.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“22.20”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · copperGrade: 1590Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
1590
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.15 m
From
238.7 m
To
239.85 m
Intercept Depth
238.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:238.7-239.85
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
23.29
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1590 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“1590”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · zincGrade: 104000Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
104000
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.15 m
From
238.7 m
To
239.85 m
Intercept Depth
238.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:238.7-239.85
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
23.29
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 104000 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“104000”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · goldGrade: 7.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
7.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
From
251.2 m
To
252.6 m
Intercept Depth
251.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:251.2-252.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
41.79
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.44 g/t gold is exceptional against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 10.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 7.44 g/t gold is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.44”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · silverGrade: 37.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
37.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
From
251.2 m
To
252.6 m
Intercept Depth
251.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:251.2-252.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
41.79
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 37.3 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 52.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“37.30”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · copperGrade: 552Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
552
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.4 m
From
251.2 m
To
252.6 m
Intercept Depth
251.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:251.2-252.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
41.79
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 552 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“552”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · zincGrade: 80400Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
80400
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.4 m
From
251.2 m
To
252.6 m
Intercept Depth
251.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:251.2-252.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
41.79
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 80400 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“80400”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · goldGrade: 1.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
1.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
From
405.3 m
To
406.7 m
Intercept Depth
405.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:405.3-406.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.99
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.13 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.13”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · silverGrade: 13.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
13.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
From
405.3 m
To
406.7 m
Intercept Depth
405.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:405.3-406.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.99
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.15 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 18.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 13.15 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.15”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · copperGrade: 655Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
655
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.4 m
From
405.3 m
To
406.7 m
Intercept Depth
405.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:405.3-406.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.99
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 655 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“655”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · zincGrade: 92514Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
92514
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.4 m
From
405.3 m
To
406.7 m
Intercept Depth
405.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:405.3-406.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.99
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 92514 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“92514”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
423.3 m
To
426.3 m
Intercept Depth
423.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:423.3-426.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.34
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.07 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · silverGrade: 5.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
5.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
423.3 m
To
426.3 m
Intercept Depth
423.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:423.3-426.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.34
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.45 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 16.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 5.45 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.45”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · copperGrade: 493Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
493
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
423.3 m
To
426.3 m
Intercept Depth
423.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:423.3-426.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.34
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 493 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“493”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · zincGrade: 15700Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
15700
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
423.3 m
To
426.3 m
Intercept Depth
423.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:423.3-426.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.34
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 15700 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“15700”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · goldGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
451.5 m
To
457.5 m
Intercept Depth
451.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:451.5-457.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.34
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.08 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.08 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.08”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · silverGrade: 3.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
3.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
451.5 m
To
457.5 m
Intercept Depth
451.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:451.5-457.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.34
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.45 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 20.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.45 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.45”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · copperGrade: 77Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
77
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6 m
From
451.5 m
To
457.5 m
Intercept Depth
451.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:451.5-457.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.34
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 77 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“77”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · zincGrade: 7882Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
7882
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6 m
From
451.5 m
To
457.5 m
Intercept Depth
451.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:451.5-457.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.34
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 7882 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“7882”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan · goldGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
0.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.45 m
From
132.55 m
To
141 m
Intercept Depth
132.55 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:132.55-141
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.51 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 4.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.51”

Context: TOM-25-015

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan · silverGrade: 5.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
5.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.45 m
From
132.55 m
To
141 m
Intercept Depth
132.55 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:132.55-141
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.51 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 46.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 5.51 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.51”

Context: TOM-25-015

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan · copperGrade: 338Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
338
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
8.45 m
From
132.55 m
To
141 m
Intercept Depth
132.55 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:132.55-141
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 338 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“338”

Context: TOM-25-015

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan · zincGrade: 16610Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
16610
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
8.45 m
From
132.55 m
To
141 m
Intercept Depth
132.55 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:132.55-141
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 16610 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“16610”

Context: TOM-25-015

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · goldGrade: 4.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
4.66
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
155.7 m
To
157.7 m
Intercept Depth
155.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:155.7-157.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
31.75
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.66 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 9.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 4.66 g/t gold is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.66”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · silverGrade: 26.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
26.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
155.7 m
To
157.7 m
Intercept Depth
155.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:155.7-157.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
31.75
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 26.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 53.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 26.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“26.90”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · copperGrade: 684Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
684
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2 m
From
155.7 m
To
157.7 m
Intercept Depth
155.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:155.7-157.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
31.75
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 684 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“684”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · zincGrade: 102850Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
102850
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2 m
From
155.7 m
To
157.7 m
Intercept Depth
155.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:155.7-157.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
31.75
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 102850 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“102850”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · goldGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
0.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20.1 m
From
182.1 m
To
202.2 m
Intercept Depth
182.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:182.1-202.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.55
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.36 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 7.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.36”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · silverGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
3.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20.1 m
From
182.1 m
To
202.2 m
Intercept Depth
182.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:182.1-202.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.55
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 64.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.20”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · copperGrade: 265Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 20.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
265
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
20.1 m
From
182.1 m
To
202.2 m
Intercept Depth
182.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:182.1-202.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.55
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 265 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“265”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · zincGrade: 7687Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 20.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
7687
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
20.1 m
From
182.1 m
To
202.2 m
Intercept Depth
182.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:182.1-202.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.55
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 7687 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“7687”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · goldGrade: 0.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 98.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
0.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
98.5 m
From
451.2 m
To
549.7 m
Intercept Depth
451.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:451.2-549.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.75
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.82 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 80.8 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.82”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · silverGrade: 3.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 98.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
3.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
98.5 m
From
451.2 m
To
549.7 m
Intercept Depth
451.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:451.2-549.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.75
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.21 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 316.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.21”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · copperGrade: 386Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 98.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
386
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
98.5 m
From
451.2 m
To
549.7 m
Intercept Depth
451.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:451.2-549.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.75
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 386 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“386”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-014Berrigan · zincGrade: 19751Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 98.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
19751
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
98.5 m
From
451.2 m
To
549.7 m
Intercept Depth
451.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:451.2-549.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.75
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 19751 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“19751”

Context: Results from drill holes TOM-25-014 and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan · goldGrade: 4.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
4.69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
452.2 m
To
457.1 m
Intercept Depth
452.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:452.2-457.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
26.67
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.69 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 23.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 4.69 g/t gold is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.69”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan · silverGrade: 18.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
18.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
452.2 m
To
457.1 m
Intercept Depth
452.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:452.2-457.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
26.67
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 92.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 18.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“18.80”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan · copperGrade: 2897Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
2897
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.9 m
From
452.2 m
To
457.1 m
Intercept Depth
452.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:452.2-457.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
26.67
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2897 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“2897”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan · goldGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 49.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
49.35 m
From
500.35 m
To
549.7 m
Intercept Depth
500.35 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:500.35-549.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 44.4 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.90”

Context: and including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan · silverGrade: 3.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 49.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
3.48
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
49.35 m
From
500.35 m
To
549.7 m
Intercept Depth
500.35 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:500.35-549.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.48 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 171.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.48 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.48”

Context: and including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan · copperGrade: 310Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 49.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
310
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
49.35 m
From
500.35 m
To
549.7 m
Intercept Depth
500.35 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:500.35-549.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 310 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“310”

Context: and including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan · zincGrade: 31250Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 49.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
31250
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
49.35 m
From
500.35 m
To
549.7 m
Intercept Depth
500.35 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:500.35-549.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 31250 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“31250”

Context: and including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan · goldGrade: 1.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
1.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.6 m
From
521 m
To
535.6 m
Intercept Depth
521 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:521-535.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.34 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 19.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.34”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan · silverGrade: 5.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
5.91
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.6 m
From
521 m
To
535.6 m
Intercept Depth
521 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:521-535.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.91 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 86.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 5.91 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.91”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan · copperGrade: 420Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 14.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
420
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
14.6 m
From
521 m
To
535.6 m
Intercept Depth
521 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:521-535.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 420 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“420”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan · zincGrade: 41158Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 14.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
41158
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
14.6 m
From
521 m
To
535.6 m
Intercept Depth
521 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:521-535.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 41158 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“41158”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan · goldGrade: 0.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
0.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.25 m
From
537.85 m
To
541.1 m
Intercept Depth
537.85 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:537.85-541.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.94
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.88 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.88”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan · silverGrade: 3.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
3.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.25 m
From
537.85 m
To
541.1 m
Intercept Depth
537.85 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:537.85-541.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.94
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.85 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.85 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.85”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan · copperGrade: 529Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
529
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3.25 m
From
537.85 m
To
541.1 m
Intercept Depth
537.85 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:537.85-541.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.94
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 529 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“529”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan · zincGrade: 58200Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
58200
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3.25 m
From
537.85 m
To
541.1 m
Intercept Depth
537.85 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:537.85-541.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.94
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 58200 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“58200”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan · goldGrade: 1.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
1.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.2 m
From
542 m
To
548.2 m
Intercept Depth
542 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:542-548.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.82
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.63 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 10.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.63”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan · silverGrade: 5.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
5.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.2 m
From
542 m
To
548.2 m
Intercept Depth
542 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:542-548.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.82
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.26 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 32.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 5.26 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.26”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan · copperGrade: 511Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
511
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6.2 m
From
542 m
To
548.2 m
Intercept Depth
542 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:542-548.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.82
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 511 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“511”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan · zincGrade: 74276Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
74276
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6.2 m
From
542 m
To
548.2 m
Intercept Depth
542 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:542-548.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.82
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 74276 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“74276”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.