Diamond Drilling Intercepts 15 Metres Grading 3.02 g/t Gold-Equivalent on the Loma Verde Vein on the Coneto Gold-Silver Project in Durango, Mexico
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Orex Minerals Inc.
- Ticker
- REX
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Durango, Mexico
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-09-16 19:18:21 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Orex Minerals Inc. announced results from its Phase-VI diamond drilling program at the Coneto Gold-Silver Project in Durango, Mexico. The program, consisting of 8 holes totaling 2,000.8 metres, focused on the Loma Verde target area. Key intercepts include 15.00 metres grading 3.02 g/t gold-equivalent and 4.50 metres grading 4.05 g/t gold-equivalent, confirming strong continuity of the vein over 1.2 km strike length and indicating further depth potential. The release also provides details of a historical Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate from 2021.
Reasoning: The document reports new diamond drill results from the Coneto Gold-Silver Project, confirming strong continuity and depth potential of the Loma Verde vein with several good gold-equivalent intercepts. The disclosure includes true widths and QP sign-off, contributing to high confidence.
Positive factors
- New drill results confirm strong continuity of the Loma Verde vein over 1.2 km strike length.
- Significant gold-equivalent intercepts, including 15.00 m grading 3.02 g/t Au-Eq and 4.50 m grading 4.05 g/t Au-Eq.
- True widths are reported for all intercepts, enhancing confidence in the results.
- QP sign-off for technical disclosure.
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 82
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 82. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (80)
BCO-84ConetoIntercept: 1.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-84
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- True Width
- 1.61 m
- From
- 104.1 m
- To
- 105.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 104.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-84:104.1-105.9
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.57
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow, low-grade gold-equivalent intercept, but with good disclosure.
Positive factors
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“0.57”
Context: 1.80
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.61
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-84ConetoIntercept: 1.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-84
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- True Width
- 1.61 m
- From
- 104.1 m
- To
- 105.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 104.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-84:104.1-105.9
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 44
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow, low-grade silver-equivalent intercept, but with good disclosure.
Positive factors
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“44”
Context: 1.80
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.61
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-84ConetoIntercept: 0.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-84
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 0.95 m
- True Width
- 0.85 m
- From
- 121.55 m
- To
- 122.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 121.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-84:121.55-122.5
Location
- Location
- Loma V
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.07
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow but high-grade gold-equivalent intercept, indicating potential for precious metals.
Positive factors
- Strong gold-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“5.07”
Context: 0.95
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.85
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-84ConetoIntercept: 0.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-84
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 0.95 m
- True Width
- 0.85 m
- From
- 121.55 m
- To
- 122.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 121.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-84:121.55-122.5
Location
- Location
- Loma V
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 386
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow but high-grade silver-equivalent intercept, indicating potential for precious metals.
Positive factors
- Strong silver-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“386”
Context: 0.95
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.85
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-85ConetoIntercept: 15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-85
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 15 m
- True Width
- 11.5 m
- From
- 87.8 m
- To
- 102.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 87.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-85:87.8-102.8
Location
- Location
- Loma V
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.02
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A significant intercept with strong gold-equivalent grade, highlighting the project's potential.
Positive factors
- Significant intercept length
- Strong gold-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“3.02”
Context: 15.00
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 11.5
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-85ConetoIntercept: 15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-85
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 15 m
- True Width
- 11.5 m
- From
- 87.8 m
- To
- 102.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 87.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-85:87.8-102.8
Location
- Location
- Loma V
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 230
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A significant intercept with strong silver-equivalent grade, highlighting the project's potential.
Positive factors
- Significant intercept length
- Strong silver-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“230”
Context: 15.00
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 11.5
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-85ConetoIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-85
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- True Width
- 3.53 m
- From
- 87.8 m
- To
- 92.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 87.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-85:87.8-92.4
Location
- Location
- Loma V
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.88
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade gold-equivalent sub-interval, significantly boosting the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong gold-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“6.88”
Context: 4.60
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.53
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-85ConetoIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-85
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- True Width
- 3.53 m
- From
- 87.8 m
- To
- 92.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 87.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-85:87.8-92.4
Location
- Location
- Loma V
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 523
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade silver-equivalent sub-interval, significantly boosting the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong silver-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“523”
Context: 4.60
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.53
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-86ConetoIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-86
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- True Width
- 0.85 m
- From
- 170.1 m
- To
- 171.25 m
- Intercept Depth
- 170.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-86:170.1-171.25
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.23
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow but high-grade gold-equivalent intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong gold-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“4.23”
Context: 1.15
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.85
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-86ConetoIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-86
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- True Width
- 0.85 m
- From
- 170.1 m
- To
- 171.25 m
- Intercept Depth
- 170.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-86:170.1-171.25
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 322
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow but high-grade silver-equivalent intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong silver-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“322”
Context: 1.15
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.85
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-86ConetoIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-86
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.85 m
- From
- 258.25 m
- To
- 259.25 m
- Intercept Depth
- 258.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-86:258.25-259.25
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow, moderate-grade gold-equivalent intercept.
Positive factors
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“1.17”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.85
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-86ConetoIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-86
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.85 m
- From
- 258.25 m
- To
- 259.25 m
- Intercept Depth
- 258.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-86:258.25-259.25
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 89
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow, moderate-grade silver-equivalent intercept.
Positive factors
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“89”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.85
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-86ConetoIntercept: 5.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-86
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- True Width
- 4.77 m
- From
- 271.9 m
- To
- 277.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 271.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-86:271.9-277.2
Location
- Location
- Loma V
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.82
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate width, moderate-grade gold-equivalent intercept.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“1.82”
Context: 5.30
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 4.77
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-86ConetoIntercept: 5.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-86
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- True Width
- 4.77 m
- From
- 271.9 m
- To
- 277.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 271.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-86:271.9-277.2
Location
- Location
- Loma V
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 138
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate width, moderate-grade silver-equivalent intercept.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“138”
Context: 5.30
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 4.77
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-86ConetoIntercept: 3.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-86
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 3.75 m
- True Width
- 3.38 m
- From
- 271.9 m
- To
- 275.65 m
- Intercept Depth
- 271.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-86:271.9-275.65
Location
- Location
- Loma V
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.07
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow, moderate-grade gold-equivalent sub-interval.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“2.07”
Context: 3.75
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.38
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-86ConetoIntercept: 3.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-86
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 3.75 m
- True Width
- 3.38 m
- From
- 271.9 m
- To
- 275.65 m
- Intercept Depth
- 271.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-86:271.9-275.65
Location
- Location
- Loma V
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 158
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow, moderate-grade silver-equivalent sub-interval.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“158”
Context: 3.75
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.38
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-87ConetoIntercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-87
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- True Width
- 0.63 m
- From
- 137.35 m
- To
- 138.05 m
- Intercept Depth
- 137.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-87:137.35-138.05
Location
- Location
- Loma V
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.05
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A very narrow, moderate-grade gold-equivalent intercept.
Positive factors
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“1.05”
Context: 0.70
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.63
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-87ConetoIntercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-87
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- True Width
- 0.63 m
- From
- 137.35 m
- To
- 138.05 m
- Intercept Depth
- 137.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-87:137.35-138.05
Location
- Location
- Loma V
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 80
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A very narrow, moderate-grade silver-equivalent intercept.
Positive factors
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“80”
Context: 0.70
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.63
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-88ConetoIntercept: 0.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-88
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 0.85 m
- True Width
- 0.65 m
- From
- 84.25 m
- To
- 85.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 84.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-88:84.25-85.1
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.81
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A very narrow but high-grade gold-equivalent intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong gold-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“3.81”
Context: 0.85
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.65
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-88ConetoIntercept: 0.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-88
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 0.85 m
- True Width
- 0.65 m
- From
- 84.25 m
- To
- 85.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 84.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-88:84.25-85.1
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 291
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A very narrow but high-grade silver-equivalent intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong silver-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“291”
Context: 0.85
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.65
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-88ConetoIntercept: 4.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-88
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- True Width
- 3.2 m
- From
- 159.8 m
- To
- 164 m
- Intercept Depth
- 159.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-88:159.8-164
Location
- Location
- Loma V
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow, moderate-grade gold-equivalent intercept.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“1.30”
Context: 4.20
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.2
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-88ConetoIntercept: 4.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-88
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- True Width
- 3.2 m
- From
- 159.8 m
- To
- 164 m
- Intercept Depth
- 159.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-88:159.8-164
Location
- Location
- Loma V
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 99
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow, moderate-grade silver-equivalent intercept.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“99”
Context: 4.20
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.2
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-88ConetoIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-88
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 1.22 m
- From
- 166.45 m
- To
- 167.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 166.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-88:166.45-167.75
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.29
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow, moderate-grade gold-equivalent intercept.
Positive factors
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“1.29”
Context: 1.30
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.22
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-88ConetoIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-88
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 1.22 m
- From
- 166.45 m
- To
- 167.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 166.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-88:166.45-167.75
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 98
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow, moderate-grade silver-equivalent intercept.
Positive factors
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“98”
Context: 1.30
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.22
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-89ConetoIntercept: 4.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-89
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 4.75 m
- True Width
- 4.42 m
- From
- 57.7 m
- To
- 62.45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-89:57.7-62.45
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.32
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate width, moderate-grade gold-equivalent intercept.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“2.32”
Context: 4.75
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 4.42
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-89ConetoIntercept: 4.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-89
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 4.75 m
- True Width
- 4.42 m
- From
- 57.7 m
- To
- 62.45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-89:57.7-62.45
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 176
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate width, moderate-grade silver-equivalent intercept.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“176”
Context: 4.75
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 4.42
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-89ConetoIntercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-89
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- True Width
- 0.7 m
- From
- 59 m
- To
- 59.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 59 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-89:59-59.75
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 9.07
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A very narrow but exceptional gold-equivalent sub-interval.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“9.07”
Context: 0.75
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.7
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-89ConetoIntercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-89
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- True Width
- 0.7 m
- From
- 59 m
- To
- 59.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 59 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-89:59-59.75
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 738
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A very narrow but exceptional silver-equivalent sub-interval.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“738”
Context: 0.75
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.7
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-89ConetoIntercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-89
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- True Width
- 3.94 m
- From
- 135.3 m
- To
- 139.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 135.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-89:135.3-139.8
Location
- Location
- Loma V
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.05
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate width, strong gold-equivalent intercept, highlighting project potential.
Positive factors
- Strong gold-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“4.05”
Context: 4.50
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.94
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-89ConetoIntercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-89
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- True Width
- 3.94 m
- From
- 135.3 m
- To
- 139.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 135.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-89:135.3-139.8
Location
- Location
- Loma V
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 309
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate width, strong silver-equivalent intercept, highlighting project potential.
Positive factors
- Strong silver-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“309”
Context: 4.50
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.94
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-89ConetoIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-89
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.87 m
- From
- 135.3 m
- To
- 136.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 135.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-89:135.3-136.3
Location
- Location
- Loma V
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 13.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow but exceptional gold-equivalent sub-interval, significantly boosting the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“13.35”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.87
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-89ConetoIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-89
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.87 m
- From
- 135.3 m
- To
- 136.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 135.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-89:135.3-136.3
Location
- Location
- Loma V
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1015
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow but exceptional silver-equivalent sub-interval, significantly boosting the overall intercept.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“1,015”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.87
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-90ConetoIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-90
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 1.41 m
- From
- 259 m
- To
- 260.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 259 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-90:259-260.5
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.77
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow but high-grade gold-equivalent intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong gold-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“4.77”
Context: 1.50
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.41
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-90ConetoIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-90
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 1.41 m
- From
- 259 m
- To
- 260.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 259 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-90:259-260.5
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 363
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow but high-grade silver-equivalent intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong silver-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“363”
Context: 1.50
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.41
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-90ConetoIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-90
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 1.22 m
- From
- 327.75 m
- To
- 329.05 m
- Intercept Depth
- 327.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-90:327.75-329.05
Location
- Location
- Loma V
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.15
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow but high-grade gold-equivalent intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong gold-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“4.15”
Context: 1.30
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.22
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-90ConetoIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-90
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 1.22 m
- From
- 327.75 m
- To
- 329.05 m
- Intercept Depth
- 327.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-90:327.75-329.05
Location
- Location
- Loma V
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 317
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow but high-grade silver-equivalent intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong silver-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“317”
Context: 1.30
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.22
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-91ConetoIntercept: 1.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-91
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.75 m
- True Width
- 1.34 m
- From
- 286.4 m
- To
- 288.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 286.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-91:286.4-288.15
Location
- Location
- Loma V
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 11.05
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow but exceptional gold-equivalent intercept.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“11.05”
Context: 1.75
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.34
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-91ConetoIntercept: 1.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-91
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 1.75 m
- True Width
- 1.34 m
- From
- 286.4 m
- To
- 288.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 286.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-91:286.4-288.15
Location
- Location
- Loma V
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 834
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow but exceptional silver-equivalent intercept.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver-equivalent grade
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“834”
Context: 1.75
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.34
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-91ConetoIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-91
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.5 m
- From
- 317.5 m
- To
- 318.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 317.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-91:317.5-318.1
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.19
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A very narrow, moderate-grade gold-equivalent intercept.
Positive factors
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“1.19”
Context: 0.60
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.5
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BCO-91ConetoIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BCO-91
- Project
- Coneto
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.5 m
- From
- 317.5 m
- To
- 318.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 317.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BCO-91:317.5-318.1
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 91
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Ag-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A very narrow, moderate-grade silver-equivalent intercept.
Positive factors
- True width disclosed
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
- QP signed
- QA/QC disclosed
Evidence · table
“91”
Context: 0.60
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.5
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
UnnamedConeto · goldGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Unnamed
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- True Width
- 1.61 m
- From
- 104.1 m
- To
- 105.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 104.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Unnamed:104.1-105.9
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.57
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.52 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.52”
Context: Unnamed
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.61
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
UnnamedConeto · silverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Unnamed
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- True Width
- 1.61 m
- From
- 104.1 m
- To
- 105.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 104.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Unnamed:104.1-105.9
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.57
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4”
Context: Unnamed
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.61
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Loma VConeto · goldGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Loma V
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.95 m
- True Width
- 0.85 m
- From
- 121.55 m
- To
- 122.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 121.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Loma V:121.55-122.5
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.07
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.17 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.17 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.17”
Context: Loma V
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.85
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Loma VConeto · silverGrade: 373Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Loma V
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 373
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.95 m
- True Width
- 0.85 m
- From
- 121.55 m
- To
- 122.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 121.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Loma V:121.55-122.5
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.07
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 373 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 354.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 373 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“373”
Context: Loma V
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.85
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Loma VConeto · goldGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Loma V
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15 m
- True Width
- 11.5 m
- From
- 87.8 m
- To
- 102.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 87.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Loma V:87.8-102.8
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.02
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.75 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 11.3 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.75”
Context: Loma V
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 11.5
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Loma VConeto · silverGrade: 173Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Loma V
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 173
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15 m
- True Width
- 11.5 m
- From
- 87.8 m
- To
- 102.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 87.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Loma V:87.8-102.8
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.02
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 173 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2595.0 g/t·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“173”
Context: Loma V
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 11.5
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Incl.Coneto · goldGrade: 1.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- True Width
- 3.53 m
- From
- 87.8 m
- To
- 92.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 87.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:87.8-92.4
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.88
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.37 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.37”
Context: Incl.
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.53
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Incl.Coneto · silverGrade: 419Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 419
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- True Width
- 3.53 m
- From
- 87.8 m
- To
- 92.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 87.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:87.8-92.4
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.88
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 419 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1927.4 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 419 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“419”
Context: Incl.
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.53
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
UnnamedConeto · goldGrade: 3.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Unnamed
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.76
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- True Width
- 0.85 m
- From
- 170.1 m
- To
- 171.25 m
- Intercept Depth
- 170.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Unnamed:170.1-171.25
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.23
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.76 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 4.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.76 g/t gold is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.76”
Context: Unnamed
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.85
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
UnnamedConeto · silverGrade: 36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Unnamed
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- True Width
- 0.85 m
- From
- 170.1 m
- To
- 171.25 m
- Intercept Depth
- 170.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Unnamed:170.1-171.25
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.23
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 36 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 41.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“36”
Context: Unnamed
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.85
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
UnnamedConeto · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Unnamed
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.85 m
- From
- 258.25 m
- To
- 259.25 m
- Intercept Depth
- 258.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Unnamed:258.25-259.25
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.21 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.21 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.21”
Context: Unnamed
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.85
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
UnnamedConeto · silverGrade: 73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Unnamed
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.85 m
- From
- 258.25 m
- To
- 259.25 m
- Intercept Depth
- 258.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Unnamed:258.25-259.25
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 73 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 73.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“73”
Context: Unnamed
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.85
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Loma VConeto · goldGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Loma V
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- True Width
- 4.77 m
- From
- 271.9 m
- To
- 277.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 271.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Loma V:271.9-277.2
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.82
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.17 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.17 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.17”
Context: Loma V
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 4.77
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Loma VConeto · silverGrade: 122Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Loma V
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 122
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- True Width
- 4.77 m
- From
- 271.9 m
- To
- 277.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 271.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Loma V:271.9-277.2
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.82
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 122 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 646.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“122”
Context: Loma V
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 4.77
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Incl.Coneto · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.75 m
- True Width
- 3.38 m
- From
- 271.9 m
- To
- 275.65 m
- Intercept Depth
- 271.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:271.9-275.65
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.07
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.20”
Context: Incl.
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.38
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Incl.Coneto · silverGrade: 143Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 143
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.75 m
- True Width
- 3.38 m
- From
- 271.9 m
- To
- 275.65 m
- Intercept Depth
- 271.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:271.9-275.65
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.07
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 143 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 536.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“143”
Context: Incl.
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.38
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Loma VConeto · goldGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Loma V
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- True Width
- 0.63 m
- From
- 137.35 m
- To
- 138.05 m
- Intercept Depth
- 137.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Loma V:137.35-138.05
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.05
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.08 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.08 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: Loma V
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.63
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Loma VConeto · silverGrade: 74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Loma V
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 74
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- True Width
- 0.63 m
- From
- 137.35 m
- To
- 138.05 m
- Intercept Depth
- 137.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Loma V:137.35-138.05
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.05
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 74 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 51.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“74”
Context: Loma V
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.63
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
UnnamedConeto · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Unnamed
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.85 m
- True Width
- 0.65 m
- From
- 84.25 m
- To
- 85.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 84.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Unnamed:84.25-85.1
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.81
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.14 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.14 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: Unnamed
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.65
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
UnnamedConeto · silverGrade: 280Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Unnamed
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 280
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.85 m
- True Width
- 0.65 m
- From
- 84.25 m
- To
- 85.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 84.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Unnamed:84.25-85.1
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.81
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 280 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 238.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 280 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“280”
Context: Unnamed
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.65
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Loma VConeto · goldGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Loma V
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.45
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- True Width
- 3.2 m
- From
- 159.8 m
- To
- 164 m
- Intercept Depth
- 159.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Loma V:159.8-164
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.45 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.45”
Context: Loma V
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.2
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Loma VConeto · silverGrade: 65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Loma V
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- True Width
- 3.2 m
- From
- 159.8 m
- To
- 164 m
- Intercept Depth
- 159.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Loma V:159.8-164
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 65 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 273.0 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“65”
Context: Loma V
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.2
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
UnnamedConeto · goldGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Unnamed
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 1.22 m
- From
- 166.45 m
- To
- 167.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 166.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Unnamed:166.45-167.75
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.29
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.58 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.58”
Context: Unnamed
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.22
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
UnnamedConeto · silverGrade: 54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Unnamed
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 1.22 m
- From
- 166.45 m
- To
- 167.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 166.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Unnamed:166.45-167.75
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.29
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 54 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 70.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“54”
Context: Unnamed
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.22
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
UnnamedConeto · goldGrade: 1.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Unnamed
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.75 m
- True Width
- 4.42 m
- From
- 57.7 m
- To
- 62.45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Unnamed:57.7-62.45
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.32
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.17 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.17”
Context: Unnamed
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 4.42
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
UnnamedConeto · silverGrade: 87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Unnamed
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 87
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.75 m
- True Width
- 4.42 m
- From
- 57.7 m
- To
- 62.45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Unnamed:57.7-62.45
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.32
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 87 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 413.3 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“87”
Context: Unnamed
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 4.42
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Incl.Coneto · goldGrade: 5.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- True Width
- 0.7 m
- From
- 59 m
- To
- 59.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 59 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:59-59.75
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 9.07
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.01 g/t gold is exceptional against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.01 g/t gold is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.01”
Context: Incl.
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.7
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Incl.Coneto · silverGrade: 357Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 357
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- True Width
- 0.7 m
- From
- 59 m
- To
- 59.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 59 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:59-59.75
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 9.07
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 357 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 267.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 357 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“357”
Context: Incl.
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.7
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Loma VConeto · goldGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Loma V
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- True Width
- 3.94 m
- From
- 135.3 m
- To
- 139.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 135.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Loma V:135.3-139.8
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.05
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 7.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.70”
Context: Loma V
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.94
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Loma VConeto · silverGrade: 180Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Loma V
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 180
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- True Width
- 3.94 m
- From
- 135.3 m
- To
- 139.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 135.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Loma V:135.3-139.8
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.05
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 180 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 810.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“180”
Context: Loma V
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.94
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Incl.Coneto · goldGrade: 5.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.87 m
- From
- 135.3 m
- To
- 136.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 135.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:135.3-136.3
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 13.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.42 g/t gold is exceptional against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.42 g/t gold is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.42”
Context: Incl.
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.87
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Incl.Coneto · silverGrade: 603Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 603
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.87 m
- From
- 135.3 m
- To
- 136.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 135.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:135.3-136.3
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 13.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 603 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 603.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 603 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“603”
Context: Incl.
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.87
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
UnnamedConeto · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Unnamed
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 1.41 m
- From
- 259 m
- To
- 260.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 259 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Unnamed:259-260.5
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.77
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.00”
Context: Unnamed
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.41
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
UnnamedConeto · silverGrade: 287Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Unnamed
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 287
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 1.41 m
- From
- 259 m
- To
- 260.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 259 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Unnamed:259-260.5
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.77
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 287 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 430.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 287 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“287”
Context: Unnamed
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.41
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Loma VConeto · goldGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Loma V
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.76
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 1.22 m
- From
- 327.75 m
- To
- 329.05 m
- Intercept Depth
- 327.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Loma V:327.75-329.05
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.15
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.76 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.76”
Context: Loma V
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.22
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Loma VConeto · silverGrade: 259Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Loma V
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 259
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 1.22 m
- From
- 327.75 m
- To
- 329.05 m
- Intercept Depth
- 327.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Loma V:327.75-329.05
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.15
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 259 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 336.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 259 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“259”
Context: Loma V
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.22
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Loma VConeto · goldGrade: 3.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Loma V
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.79
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.75 m
- True Width
- 1.34 m
- From
- 286.4 m
- To
- 288.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 286.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Loma V:286.4-288.15
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 11.05
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.79 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.79 g/t gold is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.79”
Context: Loma V
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.34
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Loma VConeto · silverGrade: 554Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Loma V
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 554
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.75 m
- True Width
- 1.34 m
- From
- 286.4 m
- To
- 288.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 286.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Loma V:286.4-288.15
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 11.05
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 554 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 969.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 554 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“554”
Context: Loma V
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.34
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
UnnamedConeto · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Unnamed
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.5 m
- From
- 317.5 m
- To
- 318.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 317.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Unnamed:317.5-318.1
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.19
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.57 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.57”
Context: Unnamed
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.5
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
UnnamedConeto · silverGrade: 47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Unnamed
- Project
- Coneto
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Geometry
- Grade
- 47
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.5 m
- From
- 317.5 m
- To
- 318.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 317.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Unnamed:317.5-318.1
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.19
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 47 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 28.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“47”
Context: Unnamed
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.5
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Resource Estimates (2)
inferredConeto Gold-Silver Project · goldTonnes: 5325000Contained Metal: 538000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Coneto Gold-Silver Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Durango, Mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2021-10-27T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Ben Whiting
- Resource group id
- resource:c1da2c9b7eee6ffec6d8
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 5325000
- Contained Metal
- 538000
- Contained Unit
- oz
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2021-10-27
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.15
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au-Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-10-27T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate provides context but is not new information and has lower confidence due to its category and age. Metal equivalent assumptions are not disclosed for this historical estimate.
Positive factors
- NI 43-101 compliant
- QP signed
Negative factors
- Inferred category
- Historical estimate
- Metal equivalent assumptions undisclosed
Evidence · text
“The 2021 Inferred Mineral Resources stands at 5,325,000 tonnes, grading 1.67 g/t gold and 112 g/t silver for a gold-equivalent grade of 3.15 g/t. Contained metal totals 286,000 oz gold and 19,111,000 oz silver, for a gold-equivalent of 538,000 oz. (The full technical report was filed on SEDAR+, www.sedarplus.com , and is also available on the Orex website, www.orexminerals.com )”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 3.4 years before this release
inferredConeto Gold-Silver Project · silverTonnes: 5325000Grade: 112Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 19111000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Coneto Gold-Silver Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- Durango, Mexico
- Ticker
- REX
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2021-10-27T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Ben Whiting
- Resource group id
- resource:c1da2c9b7eee6ffec6d8
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 5325000
- Grade
- 112
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 19111000
- Contained Unit
- oz
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2021-10-27
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-10-27T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate provides context but is not new information and has lower confidence due to its category and age.
Positive factors
- NI 43-101 compliant
- QP signed
Negative factors
- Inferred category
- Historical estimate
Evidence · text
“The 2021 Inferred Mineral Resources stands at 5,325,000 tonnes, grading 1.67 g/t gold and 112 g/t silver for a gold-equivalent grade of 3.15 g/t. Contained metal totals 286,000 oz gold and 19,111,000 oz silver, for a gold-equivalent of 538,000 oz. (The full technical report was filed on SEDAR+, www.sedarplus.com , and is also available on the Orex website, www.orexminerals.com )”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 3.4 years before this release
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.