Dinero Completes Drilling at the New Raven Property
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Dinero Ventures Ltd
- Ticker
- DNO
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- British Columbia
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver, Arsenic
- Document categories
- Drill results, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-09-17 19:36:44 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Dinero Ventures has completed a 10-hole drill program at the New Raven orogenic gold property in British Columbia. The best results include an 8.055 g/t Au intercept over 1.07m in the E-zone and a 3.331 g/t Au intercept over 2.44m in the B-zone. The company is also seeking to amend the expiry date of certain share purchase warrants.
Reasoning: The drill results show some high-grade gold intercepts (8.055 g/t) but they are very narrow (1.07m) and accompanied by arsenic. The announcement also includes a corporate warrant amendment.
Positive factors
- High-grade intercept in E-zone
- Presence of silver credits
Negative factors
- Presence of arsenic
- Narrow intercept widths
- Non-independent QP
Facts used in scoring: 6
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: 8.055 g/t Au in an orogenic setting is strong but not necessarily bonanza depending on width; however, it is a high-grade highlight.
Evidence · text
“8.055 g/t Au, 2.92 g/t Ag and 890.2 ppm As across 1.07m in the E-zone”
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: Arsenic (As) is reported in all highlighted intercepts.
Evidence · text
“890.2 ppm As”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release names the laboratory (MSA Laboratories Ltd) and a Qualified Person (Ed Kruchkowski).
Evidence · text
“analysis were performed by MSA Laboratories Ltd”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 6. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (6)
DDH-2024-NR-3New Raven · goldGrade: 1.407Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.92 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-2024-NR-3
- Project
- New Raven
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- DNO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.407
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.92 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- C-zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Laboratories Ltd
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-08-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate grade intercept with arsenic.
Negative factors
- Arsenic present
- Narrow width
Evidence · text
“1.407 g/t Au, 1.27 g/t Ag and 1178.3 ppm As across 1.92m in the C-zone in DDH-2024-NR-3”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
DDH-2024-NR-3New Raven · silverGrade: 1.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.92 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-2024-NR-3
- Project
- New Raven
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- DNO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.92 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DDH-2024-NR-3:0-1.92
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- C-zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Laboratories Ltd
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-08-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver credit in gold intercept.
Evidence · text
“1.27 g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
DDH-2024-NR-4New Raven · goldGrade: 3.331Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.44 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-2024-NR-4
- Project
- New Raven
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- DNO
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.331
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.44 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DDH-2024-NR-4:0-2.44
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- B-zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Laboratories Ltd
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-08-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Solid gold intercept.
Negative factors
- Arsenic present
Evidence · text
“3.331 g/t Au, 0.84 g/t Ag and 459.5 ppm As across 2.44m in the B-zone in DDH-2024-NR-4”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
DDH-2024-NR-4New Raven · silverGrade: 0.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.44 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-2024-NR-4
- Project
- New Raven
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- DNO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.84
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.44 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DDH-2024-NR-4:0-2.44
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- B-zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Laboratories Ltd
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-08-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver credit.
Evidence · text
“0.84 g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
DDH-2024-NR-7New Raven · goldGrade: 8.055Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.07 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-2024-NR-7
- Project
- New Raven
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- DNO
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.055
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.07 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DDH-2024-NR-7:0-1.07
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- E-zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Laboratories Ltd
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-08-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High grade intercept but very narrow.
Positive factors
- High grade
Negative factors
- Very narrow width
- Arsenic present
Evidence · text
“8.055 g/t Au, 2.92 g/t Ag and 890.2 ppm As across 1.07m in the E-zone in DDH-2024-NR-7”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
DDH-2024-NR-7New Raven · silverGrade: 2.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.07 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-2024-NR-7
- Project
- New Raven
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- DNO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.92
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.07 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DDH-2024-NR-7:0-1.07
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- E-zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Laboratories Ltd
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-08-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver credit.
Evidence · text
“2.92 g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.