Discovery-Corp Files Updated 43-101 Technical Report on Galaxy Project

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Discovery-Corp Enterprises Inc.
Ticker
DCY
Exchange
TSX
Region
British Columbia
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Copper, Silver, Palladium
Document categories
Drill results, Metallurgy
Extracted
2026-09-15 19:38:27 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Discovery-Corp Enterprises Inc. has filed an updated 43-101 Technical Report for its Galaxy Project, reiterating that the company does not currently have a mineral resource or preliminary economic assessment. The report summarizes historical drill results from 2012, which include significant copper-gold-silver-palladium intercepts, and historical metallurgical test results from 2013, indicating recoveries for copper, gold, and silver into a concentrate.

Reasoning: The document is an updated technical report that summarizes historical drill and metallurgical results, explicitly stating no current mineral resource or economic assessment, leading to low novelty and materiality. The historical metallurgical recoveries for gold and silver are low.

Positive factors

  • Historical drill results include strong copper intercepts and moderate gold intercepts.
  • Historical metallurgical test work indicates a viable concentrate can be produced.

Negative factors

  • All reported drill and metallurgical results are historical, having been previously announced in 2012 and 2013, respectively.
  • The company explicitly states it does not have a mineral resource or preliminary economic assessment for the project.
  • Metallurgical recoveries for gold and silver are low, and copper recovery is at the lower end of expectations for flotation.
  • No specific QA/QC methods (blanks, standards, duplicates) are disclosed for the drill results.
  • True widths for drill intercepts are not stated.

Facts used in scoring: 55

Classification and evidence

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: The drill results are explicitly stated as being from a November 26, 2012 news release, and the metallurgical results from a September 27, 2013 news release, indicating they are not new information.

Evidence · text

“Selected significant drill hole intercepts from the 2012 drilling and announced in a November 26, 2012 news release”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The drill intercept table provides 'Length' which is downhole interval, but no true width or drill orientation information is disclosed.

Evidence · table

“Length”

Context: Interval (m)

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: While a Qualified Person approved the technical information, specific QA/QC methods such as blanks, standards, or duplicates are not mentioned for the drill results.

Evidence · text

“The technical information in this news release was approved by Christopher Naas, P.Geo, a qualified person as defined by NI 43-101”

QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Christopher Naas, P.Geo, a qualified person as defined by NI 43-101, approved the technical information in the news release.

Evidence · text

“The technical information in this news release was approved by Christopher Naas, P.Geo, a qualified person as defined by NI 43-101”

Low Recoverynegative

Recovery below the weak band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: The reported copper recovery of 81% is below the weak band for flotation (85%), gold recovery of 59% is significantly below the weak band for flotation (80%), and silver recovery of 40% is significantly below the weak band for flotation (75%).

Evidence · text

“81% of the copper, 59% of the gold and 40% of the silver could be recovered into a concentrate grading 26% copper, 4.7 g/t gold and 45 g/t silver.”

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: the document describes a flotation route ("concentrate")

Single Domain Onlynegative

Testing limited to one composite or domain — representativeness not established.

Why it applies: only one composite was tested

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 55. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (52)

GX12-04Galaxy · copperGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: %Intercept: 33.63 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-04
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.46
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
33.63 m
From
42.62 m
To
76.25 m
Intercept Depth
42.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-04:42.62-76.25
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate copper grade over a good length, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Positive factors

  • Moderate copper grade over a significant intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.46”

Context: 33.63

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-04Galaxy · goldGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33.63 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-04
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
33.63 m
From
42.62 m
To
76.25 m
Intercept Depth
42.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-04:42.62-76.25
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak gold grade over a good length, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • Gold grade is weak for a primary target.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.13”

Context: 33.63

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-04Galaxy · silverGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33.63 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-04
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
33.63 m
From
42.62 m
To
76.25 m
Intercept Depth
42.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-04:42.62-76.25
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak silver grade over a good length, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • Silver grade is weak.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.9”

Context: 33.63

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-04Galaxy · palladiumGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33.63 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-04
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
33.63 m
From
42.62 m
To
76.25 m
Intercept Depth
42.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-04:42.62-76.25
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low palladium grade over a good length, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • Palladium grade is very low.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.020”

Context: 33.63

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-04Galaxy · copperGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.08 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-04
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
1.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8.08 m
From
42.62 m
To
50.7 m
Intercept Depth
42.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-04:42.62-50.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a strong copper grade, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade within a narrower interval.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“1.07”

Context: 8.08

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-04Galaxy · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.08 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-04
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.08 m
From
42.62 m
To
50.7 m
Intercept Depth
42.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-04:42.62-50.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a weak gold grade, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • Gold grade is at the weak threshold.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Context: 8.08

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-04Galaxy · silverGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.08 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-04
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
2.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.08 m
From
42.62 m
To
50.7 m
Intercept Depth
42.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-04:42.62-50.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a weak silver grade, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • Silver grade is weak.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“2.1”

Context: 8.08

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-04Galaxy · palladiumGrade: 0.023Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.08 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-04
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.023
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.08 m
From
42.62 m
To
50.7 m
Intercept Depth
42.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-04:42.62-50.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a very low palladium grade, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • Palladium grade is very low.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.023”

Context: 8.08

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-04Galaxy · copperGrade: 2.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-04
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
2.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
45.7 m
To
47.7 m
Intercept Depth
42.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-04:45.7-47.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a strong copper grade, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade over a narrow interval.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“2.18”

Context: 2.00

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-04Galaxy · goldGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-04
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
45.7 m
To
47.7 m
Intercept Depth
42.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-04:45.7-47.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a moderate gold grade, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade over a narrow interval.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.65”

Context: 2.00

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-04Galaxy · silverGrade: 4.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-04
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
4.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
45.7 m
To
47.7 m
Intercept Depth
42.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-04:45.7-47.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a weak silver grade, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • Silver grade is weak.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“4.4”

Context: 2.00

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-04Galaxy · palladiumGrade: 0.025Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-04
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.025
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
45.7 m
To
47.7 m
Intercept Depth
42.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-04:45.7-47.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a very low palladium grade, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • Palladium grade is very low.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.025”

Context: 2.00

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-05Galaxy · copperGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: %Intercept: 48.28 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-05
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.61
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
48.28 m
From
69.06 m
To
117.34 m
Intercept Depth
69.06 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-05:69.06-117.34
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate copper grade over a good length, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Positive factors

  • Moderate copper grade over a significant intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.61”

Context: 48.28

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-05Galaxy · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.28 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-05
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.28 m
From
69.06 m
To
117.34 m
Intercept Depth
69.06 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-05:69.06-117.34
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak gold grade over a good length, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • Gold grade is weak.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 48.28

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-05Galaxy · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.28 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-05
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.28 m
From
69.06 m
To
117.34 m
Intercept Depth
69.06 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-05:69.06-117.34
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak silver grade over a good length, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • Silver grade is weak.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“1.0”

Context: 48.28

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-05Galaxy · palladiumGrade: 0.011Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.28 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-05
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.011
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.28 m
From
69.06 m
To
117.34 m
Intercept Depth
69.06 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-05:69.06-117.34
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low palladium grade over a good length, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • Palladium grade is very low.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.011”

Context: 48.28

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-05Galaxy · copperGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-05
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
1.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11 m
From
90.06 m
To
101.06 m
Intercept Depth
69.06 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-05:90.06-101.06
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a strong copper grade, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade over a good interval.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“1.07”

Context: 11.00

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-05Galaxy · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-05
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11 m
From
90.06 m
To
101.06 m
Intercept Depth
69.06 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-05:90.06-101.06
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a weak gold grade, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • Gold grade is weak.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: 11.00

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-05Galaxy · silverGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-05
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11 m
From
90.06 m
To
101.06 m
Intercept Depth
69.06 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-05:90.06-101.06
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a weak silver grade, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • Silver grade is weak.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“1.5”

Context: 11.00

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-05Galaxy · palladiumGrade: 0.008Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-05
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.008
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11 m
From
90.06 m
To
101.06 m
Intercept Depth
69.06 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-05:90.06-101.06
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a very low palladium grade, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • Palladium grade is very low.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.008”

Context: 11.00

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-05Galaxy · copperGrade: 2.72Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-05
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
2.72
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
106.06 m
To
107.06 m
Intercept Depth
69.06 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-05:106.06-107.06
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows an exceptional copper grade, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade over a narrow interval.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“2.72”

Context: 1.00

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-05Galaxy · goldGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-05
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
106.06 m
To
107.06 m
Intercept Depth
69.06 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-05:106.06-107.06
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a moderate gold grade, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade over a narrow interval.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.49”

Context: 1.00

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-05Galaxy · silverGrade: 6.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-05
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
6.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
106.06 m
To
107.06 m
Intercept Depth
69.06 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-05:106.06-107.06
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a weak silver grade, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • Silver grade is weak.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“6.3”

Context: 1.00

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-05Galaxy · palladiumGrade: 0.015Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-05
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.015
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
106.06 m
To
107.06 m
Intercept Depth
69.06 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-05:106.06-107.06
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a very low palladium grade, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • Palladium grade is very low.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.015”

Context: 1.00

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-06Galaxy · copperGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 32.78 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-06
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.44
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
32.78 m
From
6.5 m
To
39.28 m
Intercept Depth
6.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-06:6.5-39.28
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate copper grade over a good length, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Positive factors

  • Moderate copper grade over a significant intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.44”

Context: 32.78

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-06Galaxy · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32.78 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-06
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
32.78 m
From
6.5 m
To
39.28 m
Intercept Depth
6.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-06:6.5-39.28
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak gold grade over a good length, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • Gold grade is weak.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: 32.78

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-06Galaxy · silverGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32.78 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-06
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
32.78 m
From
6.5 m
To
39.28 m
Intercept Depth
6.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-06:6.5-39.28
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak silver grade over a good length, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • Silver grade is weak.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“1.1”

Context: 32.78

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-06Galaxy · palladiumGrade: 0.019Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32.78 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-06
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.019
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
32.78 m
From
6.5 m
To
39.28 m
Intercept Depth
6.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-06:6.5-39.28
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low palladium grade over a good length, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • Palladium grade is very low.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.019”

Context: 32.78

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-06Galaxy · copperGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.52 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-06
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.62
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14.52 m
From
7.62 m
To
22.14 m
Intercept Depth
6.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-06:7.62-22.14
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a moderate copper grade, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Positive factors

  • Moderate copper grade over a good interval.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.62”

Context: 14.52

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-06Galaxy · goldGrade: 0.124Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.52 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-06
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.124
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.52 m
From
7.62 m
To
22.14 m
Intercept Depth
6.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-06:7.62-22.14
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a weak gold grade, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • Gold grade is weak.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.124”

Context: 14.52

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-06Galaxy · silverGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.52 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-06
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
1.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.52 m
From
7.62 m
To
22.14 m
Intercept Depth
6.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-06:7.62-22.14
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a weak silver grade, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • Silver grade is weak.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“1.7”

Context: 14.52

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GX12-06Galaxy · palladiumGrade: 0.023Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.52 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GX12-06
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.023
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.52 m
From
7.62 m
To
22.14 m
Intercept Depth
6.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GX12-06:7.62-22.14
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Galaxy deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a very low palladium grade, but its novelty is low as it was previously announced, and true width is not provided.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2012.
  • Palladium grade is very low.
  • True width is not disclosed.
  • No specific QA/QC methods are disclosed.

Evidence · table

“0.023”

Context: 14.52

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

inclGalaxy · copperGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.08 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
1.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8.08 m
From
42.62 m
To
50.7 m
Intercept Depth
42.62 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:42.62-50.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.07 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 8.6 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.07 % copper is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.07”

Context: incl

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inclGalaxy · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8.08 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
8.08 m
From
42.62 m
To
50.7 m
Intercept Depth
42.62 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:42.62-50.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.3 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Context: incl

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inclGalaxy · silverGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8.08 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
2.1
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
8.08 m
From
42.62 m
To
50.7 m
Intercept Depth
42.62 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:42.62-50.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2.1 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“2.1”

Context: incl

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inclGalaxy · palladiumGrade: 0.023Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8.08 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.023
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
8.08 m
From
42.62 m
To
50.7 m
Intercept Depth
42.62 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:42.62-50.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.023 ppm palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.023”

Context: incl

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inclGalaxy · copperGrade: 2.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
2.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
45.7 m
To
47.7 m
Intercept Depth
45.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:45.7-47.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.18 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 4.4 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 2.18 % copper is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.18”

Context: incl

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inclGalaxy · goldGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.65
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2 m
From
45.7 m
To
47.7 m
Intercept Depth
45.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:45.7-47.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.65 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.65”

Context: incl

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inclGalaxy · silverGrade: 4.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
4.4
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2 m
From
45.7 m
To
47.7 m
Intercept Depth
45.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:45.7-47.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4.4 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“4.4”

Context: incl

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inclGalaxy · palladiumGrade: 0.025Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.025
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2 m
From
45.7 m
To
47.7 m
Intercept Depth
45.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:45.7-47.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.025 ppm palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.025”

Context: incl

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inclGalaxy · copperGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
1.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11 m
From
90.06 m
To
101.06 m
Intercept Depth
90.06 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:90.06-101.06
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.07 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 11.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.07 % copper is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.07”

Context: incl

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inclGalaxy · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
11 m
From
90.06 m
To
101.06 m
Intercept Depth
90.06 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:90.06-101.06
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.21 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: incl

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inclGalaxy · silverGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
11 m
From
90.06 m
To
101.06 m
Intercept Depth
90.06 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:90.06-101.06
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.5 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“1.5”

Context: incl

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inclGalaxy · palladiumGrade: 0.008Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.008
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
11 m
From
90.06 m
To
101.06 m
Intercept Depth
90.06 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:90.06-101.06
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.008 ppm palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.008”

Context: incl

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andGalaxy · copperGrade: 2.72Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
2.72
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
106.06 m
To
107.06 m
Intercept Depth
106.06 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:106.06-107.06
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.72 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.7 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 2.72 % copper is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.72”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andGalaxy · goldGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1 m
From
106.06 m
To
107.06 m
Intercept Depth
106.06 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:106.06-107.06
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.49 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.49”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andGalaxy · silverGrade: 6.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
6.3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1 m
From
106.06 m
To
107.06 m
Intercept Depth
106.06 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:106.06-107.06
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 6.3 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“6.3”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andGalaxy · palladiumGrade: 0.015Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.015
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1 m
From
106.06 m
To
107.06 m
Intercept Depth
106.06 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:106.06-107.06
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.015 ppm palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.015”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inclGalaxy · copperGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.52 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.62
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14.52 m
From
7.62 m
To
22.14 m
Intercept Depth
7.62 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:7.62-22.14
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.62 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 9.0 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.62”

Context: incl

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inclGalaxy · goldGrade: 0.124Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 14.52 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.124
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
14.52 m
From
7.62 m
To
22.14 m
Intercept Depth
7.62 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:7.62-22.14
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.124 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.124”

Context: incl

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inclGalaxy · silverGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 14.52 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
1.7
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
14.52 m
From
7.62 m
To
22.14 m
Intercept Depth
7.62 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:7.62-22.14
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.7 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“1.7”

Context: incl

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inclGalaxy · palladiumGrade: 0.023Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 14.52 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Galaxy
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
DCY

Geometry

Grade
0.023
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
14.52 m
From
7.62 m
To
22.14 m
Intercept Depth
7.62 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:7.62-22.14
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.023 ppm palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.023”

Context: incl

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metallurgical Results (3)

flotationGalaxy Project · copperRecovery: 81 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Galaxy Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
DCY

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
unspecified composite

Recovery

Recovery
81 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Conc. Grade
26
Conc. Grade Unit
%

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2013-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical copper recovery is below the weak band for flotation, indicating potential processing challenges, and the data is not new.

Positive factors

  • High concentrate grade for copper.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2013.
  • Copper recovery is below the weak band for flotation.

Evidence · text

“81% of the copper”

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

flotationGalaxy Project · goldRecovery: 59 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Galaxy Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
DCY

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
unspecified composite

Recovery

Recovery
59 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Conc. Grade
4.7
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2013-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical gold recovery is significantly below the weak band for flotation, indicating significant processing challenges, and the data is not new.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2013.
  • Gold recovery is significantly below the weak band for flotation.

Evidence · text

“59% of the gold”

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

Low Recoverynegative

Recovery below the weak band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 59% is below the weak band (80%)

flotationGalaxy Project · silverRecovery: 40 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Galaxy Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
DCY

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
flotation
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
unspecified composite

Recovery

Recovery
40 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Conc. Grade
45
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2013-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical silver recovery is significantly below the weak band for flotation, indicating significant processing challenges, and the data is not new.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced in 2013.
  • Silver recovery is significantly below the weak band for flotation.

Evidence · text

“40% of the silver”

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

Low Recoverynegative

Recovery below the weak band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 40% is below the weak band (75%)

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.