# Doubleview Gold Clarifies Preliminary Economic Assessment Results for the Hat Project; Updated Scenario B NPV Increased to C$7.27 Billion Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6 Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/DBG/news/4700257025875613/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr Publisher: tmx Original announcement: 2026-03-23T20:29:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: Unknown date Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date - Company: Doubleview Gold Corp. - Ticker: DBG - Exchange: TSX - Region: British Columbia - Primary commodity: Copper - Secondary commodities: Gold, Silver, Cobalt, Scandium - Document categories: Resource update, Metallurgy, Other - Extracted: 2026-09-15 18:57:11 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.80 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Doubleview Gold Corp. clarified and updated its Preliminary Economic Assessment \(PEA\) for the Hat Project in northwestern British Columbia, reporting an increased after-tax NPV\(5%\) for Scenario B to C$7.27 billion at consensus metal prices and C$14.85 billion at spot prices. The PEA outlines a robust, multi-decade open-pit operation with significant production of copper, gold, silver, cobalt, and scandium oxide, underpinned by a substantial Measured and Indicated resource of 609 Mt at 0.43% CuEq. The company plans to immediately transition to a Pre-Feasibility Study, emphasizing the project's strategic importance as a North American source of critical minerals. Reasoning: Doubleview Gold Corp. clarified and updated its Preliminary Economic Assessment \(PEA\) results for the Hat Project, reporting a significant increase in the after-tax NPV\(5%\) for Scenario B at both consensus and spot metal prices, reinforcing the project's strong economics and strategic importance as a critical minerals producer. - Positive factor: Updated PEA shows increased after-tax NPV\(5%\) for Scenario B to C$7.27 billion at consensus prices and C$14.85 billion at spot prices. - Positive factor: Project demonstrates robust economics with strong IRRs and multi-decade mine life \(25 years\). - Positive factor: Significant production profile for copper, gold, silver, cobalt, and scandium oxide. - Positive factor: Project positioned as a primary North American source of critical minerals \(copper, scandium, cobalt\). - Positive factor: Transition to Pre-Feasibility Study \(PFS\) provides clear roadmap for advancement. - Positive factor: Substantial Measured and Indicated resource base of 609 Mt at 0.43% CuEq. - Negative factor: PEA is preliminary in nature and includes Inferred Mineral Resources, which are considered speculative. - Negative factor: Scandium recovery circuit is a newer chemical process and less mature than the conventional flowsheet. - Negative factor: Limited metallurgical and comminution data introduce uncertainty in equipment sizing and operating costs. - Negative factor: Limited geotechnical database creates uncertainty in pit slope design and mine scheduling. Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source. Facts used in scoring: 32 ## Classification and evidence **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: The document states 'Doubleview Gold Corp announced an update of the Mineral Resource estimate \(MRE\)' and provides a new MRE table with an effective date of February 4, 2026. Evidence · text > Doubleview Gold Corp announced an update of the Mineral Resource estimate \(MRE\). **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: The Mineral Resource Estimate was prepared in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum \(CIM\) Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves \(2014\), and CIM MRMR Best Practice Guidelines \(2019\), which are the basis for NI 43-101. Evidence · text > The Mineral Resource Estimate was prepared in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum \(CIM\) Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves \(2014\), and CIM MRMR Best Practice Guidelines \(2019\). **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: Mineit's Qualified Person, Tomasz Wawruch, FAusIMM, completed the MRE and reviewed and approved the technical disclosure related to the MRE. Evidence · text > Mineit's Qualified Person, Tomasz Wawruch, FAusIMM, completed the MRE, and has reviewed and approved the technical disclosure related to the MRE contained in this news release. **Measured Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves. Why it applies: The resource estimate includes a 'Measured' category with 272 Mt of material. Evidence · table > Measured Context: Mineral Resource Classification **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: The resource estimate includes an 'Indicated' category with 337 Mt of material. Evidence · table > Indicated Context: Mineral Resource Classification **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: The resource estimate includes an 'Inferred' category with 503 Mt of material. Evidence · table > Inferred Context: Mineral Resource Classification **Bench Scale Only** Polarity: negative Definition: Only preliminary bench tests completed — no locked-cycle or pilot work. Why it applies: The metallurgical testwork is described as 'early testwork comprised metallurgical characterization studies under standard laboratory conditions' with 'No attempt was made to optimize flotation conditions, and more advanced flotation testwork was not undertaken'. Evidence · text > Early metallurgical testwork comprised metallurgical characterization studies under standard laboratory conditions to demonstrate metals recoverability for inclusion in the estimate of CuEq. No attempt was made to optimize flotation conditions, and more advanced flotation testwork was not undertaken. **Mill Route** Polarity: neutral Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\). Why it applies: The processing scenario involves a 'conventional Cu-Au-Ag-Co flotation concentrator'. Evidence · text > a conventional Cu-Au-Ag-Co flotation concentrator **POX/BIOX Route** Polarity: neutral Definition: Pressure or bio-oxidation for refractory ore — high CAPEX and OPEX. Why it applies: The full circuit \(Scenario B\) involves roasting the pyrite concentrate to generate sulphuric acid and a calcine for further processing. Evidence · text > the pyrite concentrate is roasted to generate sulphuric acid and a calcine that is then processed to recover cobalt, gold, silver, and copper ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 32. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Resource Estimates (28) ### Fact 1 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-resource-facts-0) Hat #### Identity - Project: Hat - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Resource scope - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - Resource group id: resource:b572432673b34fb42fb6 - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Grade Unit: C$M #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The updated after-tax NPV\(5%\) of C$7.27 billion for Scenario B at consensus prices represents a material improvement and highlights the project's strong economic potential. - Positive factor: Significant increase in NPV from previous estimate. - Positive factor: High valuation for a preliminary economic assessment. Evidence · table > 7,274 Context: NPV 5% \(Post-tax\) #### Tags used in scoring **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### Fact 2 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-resource-facts-1) Hat #### Identity - Project: Hat - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Resource scope - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - Resource group id: resource:b572432673b34fb42fb6 - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Grade Unit: % #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: A post-tax IRR of 19% for Scenario B at consensus prices indicates a financially attractive project. - Positive factor: Solid internal rate of return for a large-scale project. Evidence · table > 19 Context: IRR \(Post-tax\) #### Tags used in scoring **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### Fact 3 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-resource-facts-2) Hat #### Identity - Project: Hat - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Resource scope - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - Resource group id: resource:b572432673b34fb42fb6 - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Grade Unit: C$M #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The updated after-tax NPV\(5%\) of C$14.85 billion for Scenario B at spot prices demonstrates very strong project economics under current market conditions. - Positive factor: Exceptional NPV at current spot prices, indicating significant upside potential. - Positive factor: Material increase from previous estimate. Evidence · table > 14,848 Context: NPV 5% \(Post-Tax\) #### Tags used in scoring **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### Fact 4 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-resource-facts-3) Hat #### Identity - Project: Hat - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Resource scope - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - Resource group id: resource:b572432673b34fb42fb6 - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Grade Unit: % #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: A post-tax IRR of 32% for Scenario B at spot prices signifies excellent project profitability. - Positive factor: Very strong internal rate of return at spot prices, indicating high profitability. Evidence · table > 32 Context: IRR \(Post-Tax\) #### Tags used in scoring **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### Fact 5 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-resource-facts-4) Hat #### Identity - Project: Hat - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Resource scope - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - Resource group id: resource:b572432673b34fb42fb6 - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Grade Unit: years #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: A 25-year mine life indicates a large-scale, long-term project with significant operational longevity. - Positive factor: Long mine life provides stability and long-term cash flow. Evidence · text > The mine plan supports a multi-decade life of 25 years #### Tags used in scoring **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### Fact 6 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-resource-facts-5) Hat #### Identity - Project: Hat - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Resource scope - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - Resource group id: resource:b572432673b34fb42fb6 - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: An average annual throughput of 42 Mt confirms the project's large-scale conventional open-pit operation. - Positive factor: High annual throughput indicates a large-scale mining operation. Evidence · table > 42 Context: Average Annual Throughput #### Tags used in scoring **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### Fact 7 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-resource-facts-6) Hat #### Identity - Project: Hat - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Resource scope - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - Resource group id: resource:b572432673b34fb42fb6 - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Grade Unit: % #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: A CuEq head grade of 0.42% for Scenario B provides a good basis for economic extraction in a bulk tonnage operation. - Positive factor: Reasonable head grade for a large-scale porphyry-style deposit. Evidence · table > 0.42 Context: CuEq Head Grade #### Tags used in scoring **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### Fact 8 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-resource-facts-7) Hat #### Identity - Project: Hat - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Resource scope - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - Resource group id: resource:b572432673b34fb42fb6 - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Average annual copper production of 67.6 kt for Scenario B indicates a substantial copper output. - Positive factor: Significant annual copper production contributes to project revenue. Evidence · table > 67.6 Context: Average Annual Cu Production #### Tags used in scoring **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### Fact 9 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-resource-facts-8) Hat #### Identity - Project: Hat - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Resource scope - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - Resource group id: resource:b572432673b34fb42fb6 - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Average annual gold production of 217.3 koz for Scenario B represents a valuable co-product stream. - Positive factor: Strong annual gold production provides significant byproduct credits. Evidence · table > 217.3 Context: Average Annual Au Production #### Tags used in scoring **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### Fact 10 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-resource-facts-9) Hat #### Identity - Project: Hat - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Resource scope - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - Resource group id: resource:b572432673b34fb42fb6 - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Average annual cobalt production of 2.5 kt for Scenario B highlights the project's contribution to critical mineral supply. - Positive factor: Meaningful annual cobalt production, a critical mineral. Evidence · table > 2.5 Context: Average Annual Co Production #### Tags used in scoring **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### Fact 11 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-resource-facts-10) Hat #### Identity - Project: Hat - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Resource scope - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - Resource group id: resource:b572432673b34fb42fb6 - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Average annual scandium oxide production of 128.4 t for Scenario B provides additional revenue from a strategic metal. - Positive factor: Scandium oxide production adds value from a high-value critical mineral. Evidence · table > 128.4 Context: Average Annual Sc 2 O 3 Production #### Tags used in scoring **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### Fact 12 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-resource-facts-11) Hat #### Identity - Project: Hat - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Resource scope - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - Resource group id: resource:b572432673b34fb42fb6 - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Grade Unit: C$M #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Initial capital costs of C$3.83 billion for Scenario B are substantial, reflecting the scale and complexity of the project. - Negative factor: High initial capital cost for project development. Evidence · table > 3,828 Context: Initial Capital Costs #### Tags used in scoring **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### Fact 13 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-resource-facts-12) Hat #### Identity - Project: Hat - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Resource scope - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - Resource group id: resource:b572432673b34fb42fb6 - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Grade Unit: C$/t-milled #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Total operating costs of C$21.92/t-milled for Scenario B reflect the additional processing requirements for cobalt and scandium. - Negative factor: Operating costs are higher due to the added hydrometallurgical and scandium circuits. Evidence · table > 21.92 Context: Total Operating Costs #### Tags used in scoring **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### measured [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-resource-facts-13) Hat Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Hat Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch - Resource group id: resource:779c3584082848e91836 - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: measured - Tonnes: 272000000 - Grade: 0.22 - Grade Unit: % - Contained Metal: 1.11 - Contained Unit: blb - Cutoff Grade: 0.2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-02-04 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 0.44 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Measured resource of 272 Mt at 0.22% Cu for 1.11 Blb contained copper provides a high-confidence base for project development. - Positive factor: High confidence Measured category resource. - Positive factor: Significant contained copper. Evidence · table > 0.22 Context: 272 #### Tags used in scoring **Measured Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves. Why it applies: category is "measured" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### measured [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-resource-facts-14) Hat Project · gold #### Identity - Project: Hat Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch - Resource group id: resource:779c3584082848e91836 - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: measured - Tonnes: 272000000 - Grade: 0.18 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 1.41 - Contained Unit: moz - Cutoff Grade: 0.2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-02-04 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 0.44 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Measured resource includes 1.41 Moz of contained gold, adding significant value as a co-product. - Positive factor: High confidence Measured category resource. - Positive factor: Significant contained gold as a co-product. Evidence · table > 0.18 Context: 272 #### Tags used in scoring **Measured Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves. Why it applies: category is "measured" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### measured [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-resource-facts-15) Hat Project · cobalt #### Identity - Project: Hat Project - Commodity: cobalt - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch - Resource group id: resource:779c3584082848e91836 - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: measured - Tonnes: 272000000 - Grade: 76.26 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 35.6 - Contained Unit: mlb - Cutoff Grade: 0.2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-02-04 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 0.44 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Measured resource contains 35.6 Mlb of cobalt, contributing to the project's critical mineral profile. - Positive factor: High confidence Measured category resource. - Positive factor: Significant contained cobalt, a critical mineral. Evidence · table > 76.26 Context: 272 #### Tags used in scoring **Measured Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves. Why it applies: category is "measured" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### measured [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-resource-facts-16) Hat Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Hat Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch - Resource group id: resource:779c3584082848e91836 - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: measured - Tonnes: 272000000 - Grade: 0.37 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 2.17 - Contained Unit: moz - Cutoff Grade: 0.2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-02-04 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 0.44 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Measured resource includes 2.17 Moz of contained silver, providing additional byproduct revenue. - Positive factor: High confidence Measured category resource. - Positive factor: Contained silver adds byproduct value. Evidence · table > 0.37 Context: 272 #### Tags used in scoring **Measured Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves. Why it applies: category is "measured" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### measured [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-resource-facts-17) Hat Project · scandium #### Identity - Project: Hat Project - Commodity: scandium - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch - Resource group id: resource:779c3584082848e91836 - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: measured - Tonnes: 272000000 - Grade: 28.79 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 1081 - Contained Unit: t - Cutoff Grade: 0.2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-02-04 #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Measured resource contains 1,081 t of scandium oxide, adding a valuable critical mineral component to the project. - Positive factor: High confidence Measured category resource. - Positive factor: Significant contained scandium oxide, a high-value critical mineral. Evidence · table > 28.79 Context: 272 #### Tags used in scoring **Measured Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves. Why it applies: category is "measured" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-resource-facts-18) Hat Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Hat Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch - Resource group id: resource:cbf642e2197211e4a204 - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 337000000 - Grade: 0.21 - Grade Unit: % - Contained Metal: 1.31 - Contained Unit: blb - Cutoff Grade: 0.2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-02-04 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 0.43 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Indicated resource of 337 Mt at 0.21% Cu for 1.31 Blb contained copper provides a strong basis for future studies. - Positive factor: Good confidence Indicated category resource. - Positive factor: Significant contained copper. Evidence · table > 0.21 Context: 337 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-resource-facts-19) Hat Project · gold #### Identity - Project: Hat Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch - Resource group id: resource:cbf642e2197211e4a204 - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 337000000 - Grade: 0.19 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 1.81 - Contained Unit: moz - Cutoff Grade: 0.2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-02-04 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 0.43 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Indicated resource includes 1.81 Moz of contained gold, further enhancing project value. - Positive factor: Good confidence Indicated category resource. - Positive factor: Significant contained gold as a co-product. Evidence · table > 0.19 Context: 337 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-resource-facts-20) Hat Project · cobalt #### Identity - Project: Hat Project - Commodity: cobalt - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch - Resource group id: resource:cbf642e2197211e4a204 - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 337000000 - Grade: 76.81 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 44.5 - Contained Unit: mlb - Cutoff Grade: 0.2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-02-04 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 0.43 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Indicated resource contains 44.5 Mlb of cobalt, reinforcing the project's critical mineral status. - Positive factor: Good confidence Indicated category resource. - Positive factor: Significant contained cobalt, a critical mineral. Evidence · table > 76.81 Context: 337 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-resource-facts-21) Hat Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Hat Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch - Resource group id: resource:cbf642e2197211e4a204 - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 337000000 - Grade: 0.39 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 2.88 - Contained Unit: moz - Cutoff Grade: 0.2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-02-04 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 0.43 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Indicated resource includes 2.88 Moz of contained silver, contributing to overall project economics. - Positive factor: Good confidence Indicated category resource. - Positive factor: Contained silver adds byproduct value. Evidence · table > 0.39 Context: 337 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-resource-facts-22) Hat Project · scandium #### Identity - Project: Hat Project - Commodity: scandium - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch - Resource group id: resource:cbf642e2197211e4a204 - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 337000000 - Grade: 28.76 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 1334 - Contained Unit: t - Cutoff Grade: 0.2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-02-04 #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Indicated resource contains 1,334 t of scandium oxide, adding to the project's critical mineral inventory. - Positive factor: Good confidence Indicated category resource. - Positive factor: Significant contained scandium oxide, a high-value critical mineral. Evidence · table > 28.76 Context: 337 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-resource-facts-23) Hat Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Hat Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch - Resource group id: resource:221edf005c07aad83abf - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 503000000 - Grade: 0.18 - Grade Unit: % - Contained Metal: 1.72 - Contained Unit: blb - Cutoff Grade: 0.2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-02-04 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 0.41 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred resource of 503 Mt at 0.18% Cu for 1.72 Blb contained copper represents significant potential for future conversion. - Positive factor: Large tonnage in the Inferred category provides exploration upside. - Negative factor: Lower confidence Inferred category. Evidence · table > 0.18 Context: 503 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-resource-facts-24) Hat Project · gold #### Identity - Project: Hat Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch - Resource group id: resource:221edf005c07aad83abf - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 503000000 - Grade: 0.19 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 2.77 - Contained Unit: moz - Cutoff Grade: 0.2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-02-04 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 0.41 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred resource includes 2.77 Moz of contained gold, offering substantial exploration potential. - Positive factor: Large contained gold in the Inferred category provides future upside. - Negative factor: Lower confidence Inferred category. Evidence · table > 0.19 Context: 503 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-resource-facts-25) Hat Project · cobalt #### Identity - Project: Hat Project - Commodity: cobalt - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch - Resource group id: resource:221edf005c07aad83abf - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 503000000 - Grade: 76.62 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 66.2 - Contained Unit: mlb - Cutoff Grade: 0.2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-02-04 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 0.41 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred resource contains 66.2 Mlb of cobalt, indicating significant potential for this critical mineral. - Positive factor: Large contained cobalt in the Inferred category provides future upside for a critical mineral. - Negative factor: Lower confidence Inferred category. Evidence · table > 76.62 Context: 503 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-resource-facts-26) Hat Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Hat Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch - Resource group id: resource:221edf005c07aad83abf - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 503000000 - Grade: 0.38 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 4.19 - Contained Unit: moz - Cutoff Grade: 0.2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-02-04 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 0.41 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred resource includes 4.19 Moz of contained silver, adding to the project's overall metal endowment. - Positive factor: Large contained silver in the Inferred category provides future upside. - Negative factor: Lower confidence Inferred category. Evidence · table > 0.38 Context: 503 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-resource-facts-27) Hat Project · scandium #### Identity - Project: Hat Project - Commodity: scandium - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch - Resource group id: resource:221edf005c07aad83abf - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 503000000 - Grade: 28.69 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 1996 - Contained Unit: t - Cutoff Grade: 0.2 - Cutoff Unit: % CuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-02-04 #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Inferred resource contains 1,996 t of scandium oxide, indicating significant potential for this strategic metal. - Positive factor: Large contained scandium oxide in the Inferred category provides future upside for a high-value critical mineral. - Negative factor: Lower confidence Inferred category. Evidence · table > 28.69 Context: 503 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ## Metallurgical Results (4) ### flotation [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-metallurgical-facts-28) Hat Project · copper #### Identity - Project: Hat Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Test Work - Program Status: preliminary - Test Type: flotation - Processing Route: conventional Cu-Au-Ag-Co flotation concentrator with downstream hydrometallurgical scandium recovery circuit #### Recovery - Recovery: 85 % - Recovery Basis: actual\_test - Head Grade: 0.21 - Head Grade Unit: % #### Lab - Laboratory: Sepro Laboratories - Consultant: Magister Metallurgy #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: A copper recovery of 85% from preliminary testwork is positive, with potential for improvement through optimization. - Positive factor: Good copper recovery for a polymetallic ore. - Negative factor: Testwork is early-stage and not optimized. Evidence · table > 85 Context: Combined Concentrates #### Tags used in scoring **Mill Route** Polarity: neutral Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\). Why it applies: processing\_route matches the mill\_cil signal **Byproduct Commodity** Polarity: neutral Definition: The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver. Why it applies: the release describes a byproduct credit ### flotation [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-metallurgical-facts-29) Hat Project · cobalt #### Identity - Project: Hat Project - Commodity: cobalt - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Test Work - Program Status: preliminary - Test Type: flotation - Processing Route: conventional Cu-Au-Ag-Co flotation concentrator with downstream hydrometallurgical scandium recovery circuit #### Recovery - Recovery: 78 % - Recovery Basis: actual\_test - Head Grade: 132 - Head Grade Unit: g/t #### Lab - Laboratory: Sepro Laboratories - Consultant: Magister Metallurgy #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: A cobalt recovery of 78% from preliminary testwork is very good, especially given its critical mineral status. - Positive factor: Strong cobalt recovery for a critical mineral. - Negative factor: Testwork is early-stage and not optimized. Evidence · table > 78 Context: Combined Concentrates #### Tags used in scoring **Mill Route** Polarity: neutral Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\). Why it applies: processing\_route matches the mill\_cil signal **Byproduct Commodity** Polarity: neutral Definition: The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver. Why it applies: the release describes a byproduct credit ### flotation [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-metallurgical-facts-30) Hat Project · gold #### Identity - Project: Hat Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Test Work - Program Status: preliminary - Test Type: flotation - Processing Route: conventional Cu-Au-Ag-Co flotation concentrator with downstream hydrometallurgical scandium recovery circuit #### Recovery - Recovery: 89 % - Recovery Basis: actual\_test - Head Grade: 0.34 - Head Grade Unit: g/t #### Lab - Laboratory: Sepro Laboratories - Consultant: Magister Metallurgy #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: A gold recovery of 89% from preliminary testwork is excellent, contributing significantly to project economics. - Positive factor: High gold recovery for a co-product. - Negative factor: Testwork is early-stage and not optimized. Evidence · table > 89 Context: Combined Concentrates #### Tags used in scoring **Mill Route** Polarity: neutral Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\). Why it applies: processing\_route matches the mill\_cil signal **Byproduct Commodity** Polarity: neutral Definition: The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver. Why it applies: the release describes a byproduct credit ### flotation [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-clarifies-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-the-hat-pr--b97facb2-631e-47cf-8ba4-9964710987c6#fact-metallurgical-facts-31) Hat Project · silver #### Identity - Project: Hat Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: DBG #### Test Work - Program Status: preliminary - Test Type: flotation - Processing Route: conventional Cu-Au-Ag-Co flotation concentrator with downstream hydrometallurgical scandium recovery circuit #### Recovery - Recovery: 68 % - Recovery Basis: actual\_test - Head Grade: 2.9 - Head Grade Unit: g/t #### Lab - Laboratory: Sepro Laboratories - Consultant: Magister Metallurgy #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-03-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: A silver recovery of 68% from preliminary testwork is acceptable for a byproduct, with potential for optimization. - Positive factor: Reasonable silver recovery for a byproduct. - Negative factor: Testwork is early-stage and not optimized. Evidence · table > 68 Context: Combined Concentrates #### Tags used in scoring **Mill Route** Polarity: neutral Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\). Why it applies: processing\_route matches the mill\_cil signal **Low Recovery** Polarity: negative Definition: Recovery below the weak band for the commodity and processing route. Why it applies: 68% is below the weak band \(75%\) **Byproduct Commodity** Polarity: neutral Definition: The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver. Why it applies: the release describes a byproduct credit ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.