# Doubleview Gold Corp. Pursues Strategic Government Engagement Following US$400M U.S. Dept of War Scandium Funding Initiative

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-corp-pursues-strategic-government-engagement-following-us-400m-u--4ab5cf6b-a545-4d98-a311-6a3cc639d283

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/DBG/news/7837543871330737/doubleview-gold-corp-pursues-strategic-government-engagement-following-us-400m-u

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2026-08-12T15:02:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Doubleview Gold Corp.

- Ticker: DBG

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: British Columbia

- Primary commodity: Copper

- Secondary commodities: Gold, Cobalt, Silver, Scandium

- Document categories: Resource update, Other

- Extracted: 2026-09-15 18:31:17 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.60 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Doubleview Gold Corp. is engaging with Canadian government leadership following US government funding initiatives for scandium. The company highlighted the Hat Project's Mineral Resource Estimate, which includes significant copper, gold, cobalt, and scandium oxide resources.

Reasoning: The document restates a Mineral Resource Estimate effective February 4, 2026, to provide context for strategic government engagement regarding scandium funding. While the resource scale is significant, the novelty is low as the MRE was previously announced.

- Positive factor: Significant contained metal scale

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC/NI 43-101 compliant context

- Positive factor: Strategic government engagement context

- Negative factor: High Inferred component \(41% of total M+I\)

- Negative factor: Scandium recovery is relatively low \(72%\)

Facts used in scoring: 15

## Classification and evidence

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: A significant portion of the resource is in the Inferred category.

Evidence · table

> Inferred

Context: 503

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Tomasz Wawruch, FAusIMM, is named as the Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

> Tomasz Wawruch, FAusIMM, of Mineit, is the Qualified Person

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The MRE was prepared in accordance with CIM standards and mentions NI 43-101 for metallurgical studies.

Evidence · text

> prepared the MRE in accordance with CIM Definition Standards

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 15. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (15)

### measured

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-corp-pursues-strategic-government-engagement-following-us-400m-u--4ab5cf6b-a545-4d98-a311-6a3cc639d283#fact-resource-facts-0)

Hat Project · copper

#### Identity

- Project: Hat Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_bc
- Reported Region: British Columbia
- Ticker: DBG

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch, Gilles Arseneau
- Resource group id: resource:f0446802f6e662bbb44d
- Deposit or zone: Hat Project
- Mining method: open\_pit

#### Resource Data

- Category: measured
- Tonnes: 272000000
- Grade: 0.22
- Grade Unit: %
- Cutoff Grade: 0.2
- Cutoff Unit: % CuEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-02-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 0.44
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured copper grade in a porphyry-style system.

- Positive factor: Measured category

Evidence · table

> 0.22

Context: 272

#### Tags used in scoring

**Measured Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### measured

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-corp-pursues-strategic-government-engagement-following-us-400m-u--4ab5cf6b-a545-4d98-a311-6a3cc639d283#fact-resource-facts-1)

Hat Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Hat Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_bc
- Reported Region: British Columbia
- Ticker: DBG

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch, Gilles Arseneau
- Resource group id: resource:f0446802f6e662bbb44d
- Deposit or zone: Hat Project
- Mining method: open\_pit

#### Resource Data

- Category: measured
- Tonnes: 272000000
- Grade: 0.18
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Cutoff Grade: 0.2
- Cutoff Unit: % CuEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-02-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 0.44
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured gold grade.

Evidence · table

> 0.18

Context: 272

#### Tags used in scoring

**Measured Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### measured

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-corp-pursues-strategic-government-engagement-following-us-400m-u--4ab5cf6b-a545-4d98-a311-6a3cc639d283#fact-resource-facts-2)

Hat Project · cobalt

#### Identity

- Project: Hat Project
- Commodity: cobalt
- Region: canada\_bc
- Reported Region: British Columbia
- Ticker: DBG

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch, Gilles Arseneau
- Resource group id: resource:f0446802f6e662bbb44d
- Deposit or zone: Hat Project
- Mining method: open\_pit

#### Resource Data

- Category: measured
- Tonnes: 272000000
- Grade: 0.008
- Grade Unit: %
- Cutoff Grade: 0.2
- Cutoff Unit: % CuEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-02-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 0.44
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured cobalt grade.

Evidence · table

> 0.008

Context: 272

#### Tags used in scoring

**Measured Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### measured

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-corp-pursues-strategic-government-engagement-following-us-400m-u--4ab5cf6b-a545-4d98-a311-6a3cc639d283#fact-resource-facts-3)

Hat Project · silver

#### Identity

- Project: Hat Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: canada\_bc
- Reported Region: British Columbia
- Ticker: DBG

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch, Gilles Arseneau
- Resource group id: resource:f0446802f6e662bbb44d
- Deposit or zone: Hat Project
- Mining method: open\_pit

#### Resource Data

- Category: measured
- Tonnes: 272000000
- Grade: 0.37
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Cutoff Grade: 0.2
- Cutoff Unit: % CuEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-02-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 0.44
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured silver grade.

Evidence · table

> 0.37

Context: 272

#### Tags used in scoring

**Measured Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### measured

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-corp-pursues-strategic-government-engagement-following-us-400m-u--4ab5cf6b-a545-4d98-a311-6a3cc639d283#fact-resource-facts-4)

Hat Project · scandium

#### Identity

- Project: Hat Project
- Commodity: scandium
- Region: canada\_bc
- Reported Region: British Columbia
- Ticker: DBG

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch, Gilles Arseneau
- Resource group id: resource:f0446802f6e662bbb44d
- Deposit or zone: Hat Project
- Mining method: open\_pit

#### Resource Data

- Category: measured
- Tonnes: 272000000
- Grade: 28.79
- Grade Unit: g/t

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-02-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured scandium oxide grade.

- Positive factor: High grade scandium

Evidence · table

> 28.79

Context: 272

#### Tags used in scoring

**Measured Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-corp-pursues-strategic-government-engagement-following-us-400m-u--4ab5cf6b-a545-4d98-a311-6a3cc639d283#fact-resource-facts-5)

Hat Project · copper

#### Identity

- Project: Hat Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_bc
- Reported Region: British Columbia
- Ticker: DBG

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch, Gilles Arseneau
- Resource group id: resource:eb58699fee47f09abd9d
- Deposit or zone: Hat Project
- Mining method: open\_pit

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 337000000
- Grade: 0.21
- Grade Unit: %
- Cutoff Grade: 0.2
- Cutoff Unit: % CuEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-02-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 0.43
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated copper grade.

Evidence · table

> 0.21

Context: 337

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-corp-pursues-strategic-government-engagement-following-us-400m-u--4ab5cf6b-a545-4d98-a311-6a3cc639d283#fact-resource-facts-6)

Hat Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Hat Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_bc
- Reported Region: British Columbia
- Ticker: DBG

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch, Gilles Arseneau
- Resource group id: resource:eb58699fee47f09abd9d
- Deposit or zone: Hat Project
- Mining method: open\_pit

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 337000000
- Grade: 0.19
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Cutoff Grade: 0.2
- Cutoff Unit: % CuEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-02-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 0.43
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated gold grade.

Evidence · table

> 0.19

Context: 337

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-corp-pursues-strategic-government-engagement-following-us-400m-u--4ab5cf6b-a545-4d98-a311-6a3cc639d283#fact-resource-facts-7)

Hat Project · cobalt

#### Identity

- Project: Hat Project
- Commodity: cobalt
- Region: canada\_bc
- Reported Region: British Columbia
- Ticker: DBG

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch, Gilles Arseneau
- Resource group id: resource:eb58699fee47f09abd9d
- Deposit or zone: Hat Project
- Mining method: open\_pit

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 337000000
- Grade: 0.008
- Grade Unit: %
- Cutoff Grade: 0.2
- Cutoff Unit: % CuEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-02-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 0.43
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated cobalt grade.

Evidence · table

> 0.008

Context: 337

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-corp-pursues-strategic-government-engagement-following-us-400m-u--4ab5cf6b-a545-4d98-a311-6a3cc639d283#fact-resource-facts-8)

Hat Project · silver

#### Identity

- Project: Hat Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: canada\_bc
- Reported Region: British Columbia
- Ticker: DBG

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch, Gilles Arseneau
- Resource group id: resource:eb58699fee47f09abd9d
- Deposit or zone: Hat Project
- Mining method: open\_pit

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 337000000
- Grade: 0.39
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Cutoff Grade: 0.2
- Cutoff Unit: % CuEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-02-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 0.43
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated silver grade.

Evidence · table

> 0.39

Context: 337

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-corp-pursues-strategic-government-engagement-following-us-400m-u--4ab5cf6b-a545-4d98-a311-6a3cc639d283#fact-resource-facts-9)

Hat Project · scandium

#### Identity

- Project: Hat Project
- Commodity: scandium
- Region: canada\_bc
- Reported Region: British Columbia
- Ticker: DBG

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch, Gilles Arseneau
- Resource group id: resource:eb58699fee47f09abd9d
- Deposit or zone: Hat Project
- Mining method: open\_pit

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 337000000
- Grade: 28.76
- Grade Unit: g/t

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-02-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated scandium oxide grade.

- Positive factor: High grade scandium

Evidence · table

> 28.76

Context: 337

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-corp-pursues-strategic-government-engagement-following-us-400m-u--4ab5cf6b-a545-4d98-a311-6a3cc639d283#fact-resource-facts-10)

Hat Project · copper

#### Identity

- Project: Hat Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_bc
- Reported Region: British Columbia
- Ticker: DBG

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch, Gilles Arseneau
- Resource group id: resource:1065e3c182dc807fef8d
- Deposit or zone: Hat Project
- Mining method: open\_pit

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 503000000
- Grade: 0.18
- Grade Unit: %
- Cutoff Grade: 0.2
- Cutoff Unit: % CuEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-02-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 0.41
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred copper grade.

- Negative factor: Inferred category

Evidence · table

> 0.18

Context: 503

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-corp-pursues-strategic-government-engagement-following-us-400m-u--4ab5cf6b-a545-4d98-a311-6a3cc639d283#fact-resource-facts-11)

Hat Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Hat Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_bc
- Reported Region: British Columbia
- Ticker: DBG

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch, Gilles Arseneau
- Resource group id: resource:1065e3c182dc807fef8d
- Deposit or zone: Hat Project
- Mining method: open\_pit

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 503000000
- Grade: 0.19
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Cutoff Grade: 0.2
- Cutoff Unit: % CuEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-02-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 0.41
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred gold grade.

- Negative factor: Inferred category

Evidence · table

> 0.19

Context: 503

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-corp-pursues-strategic-government-engagement-following-us-400m-u--4ab5cf6b-a545-4d98-a311-6a3cc639d283#fact-resource-facts-12)

Hat Project · cobalt

#### Identity

- Project: Hat Project
- Commodity: cobalt
- Region: canada\_bc
- Reported Region: British Columbia
- Ticker: DBG

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch, Gilles Arseneau
- Resource group id: resource:1065e3c182dc807fef8d
- Deposit or zone: Hat Project
- Mining method: open\_pit

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 503000000
- Grade: 0.008
- Grade Unit: %
- Cutoff Grade: 0.2
- Cutoff Unit: % CuEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-02-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 0.41
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred cobalt grade.

- Negative factor: Inferred category

Evidence · table

> 0.008

Context: 503

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-corp-pursues-strategic-government-engagement-following-us-400m-u--4ab5cf6b-a545-4d98-a311-6a3cc639d283#fact-resource-facts-13)

Hat Project · silver

#### Identity

- Project: Hat Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: canada\_bc
- Reported Region: British Columbia
- Ticker: DBG

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch, Gilles Arseneau
- Resource group id: resource:1065e3c182dc807fef8d
- Deposit or zone: Hat Project
- Mining method: open\_pit

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 503000000
- Grade: 0.38
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Cutoff Grade: 0.2
- Cutoff Unit: % CuEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-02-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 0.41
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred silver grade.

- Negative factor: Inferred category

Evidence · table

> 0.38

Context: 503

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/doubleview-gold-corp-pursues-strategic-government-engagement-following-us-400m-u--4ab5cf6b-a545-4d98-a311-6a3cc639d283#fact-resource-facts-14)

Hat Project · scandium

#### Identity

- Project: Hat Project
- Commodity: scandium
- Region: canada\_bc
- Reported Region: British Columbia
- Ticker: DBG

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Tomasz Wawruch, Gilles Arseneau
- Resource group id: resource:1065e3c182dc807fef8d
- Deposit or zone: Hat Project
- Mining method: open\_pit

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 503000000
- Grade: 28.69
- Grade Unit: g/t

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-02-04

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred scandium oxide grade.

- Positive factor: High grade scandium

- Negative factor: Inferred category

Evidence · table

> 28.69

Context: 503

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
