DRILLING STRENGTHENS LA NEGRA SE AHEAD OF MRE

Original announcement by research on

Company
Unico Silver Limited
Ticker
USL
Exchange
ASX
Region
Santa Cruz, Argentina
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver
Document categories
Drill results, Other, Resource update
Extracted
2026-11-07 10:59:27 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Unico Silver reported assay results from the first two holes at the La Negra SE discovery within the Joaquin Project in Santa Cruz, Argentina. The holes returned broad gold-silver intervals and the company said the discovery is now defined over 425m of strike and 125m of vertical extent. The release also says drilling is ongoing and that the maiden JORC MRE has been deferred to November 2025 to incorporate the new results.

Reasoning: Strong extensional drill results from a discovery area ahead of a maiden resource estimate, with wide intercepts and explicit continuity/scale upside.

Positive factors

  • Two new drill holes returned broad, high-grade gold-silver intercepts at La Negra SE.
  • Results extend mineralisation along strike and at depth and support a higher-confidence maiden MRE.
  • True thickness is stated as up to 75 metres and the system remains open to the southeast and at depth.

Negative factors

  • Assays are still pending for additional holes.
  • Reported intervals rely on AgEq with disclosed assumptions, but the key new intervals are reported directly in Au and Ag as well.

Rubric flags

  • drill_results:true_width_red_flag — Individual intercepts are reported as downhole lengths; only the release-level statement gives true thickness up to 75 metres, so individual fact rows should be treated cautiously as apparent width only unless a hole-specific true width is stated.

Facts used in scoring: 94

Classification and evidence

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: The release states that true thickness is up to 75 metres.

Evidence · text

“True thickness is up to 75 metres.”

Step Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The two holes were designed to extend mineralisation along strike and at depth, and the release says the system remains open to the southeast and at depth.

Evidence · text

“designed to extend mineralisation along strike and at depth”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The announcement includes laboratory and QA/QC details, including blanks, standards, duplicates and certified reference materials.

Evidence · text

“QAQC samples are inserted at the following frequency of primary samples: • Blanks: 1 in 50 • Duplicates: 1 in 20 • Standards: 1 in 25”

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: The drill composite methodology states a cut-off of 40 gpt AgEq, but the main assay rows are presented as AgEq without all interval methodology being fully contextualized in the headline result tables.

Evidence · text

“Mineralised drill hole intercepts are calculated using greater than 40gpt AgEq with no more than 3m of internal dilution.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The reported intervals are downhole lengths and no true width is stated for the individual holes in the assay table.

Evidence · text

“From To Interval”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The release describes ongoing infill drilling at La Negra to support a higher-confidence maiden MRE.

Evidence · text

“Ongoing infill drilling (24 holes for 3347m) at La Negra supports a higher confidence maiden JORC Mineral Resource Estimate”

Free Millingpositive · Story-specific tag

Simple, clean ore amenable to standard processing without oxidation.

Why it applies: The summary states the current drilling program is targeting 'free-milling silver ounces'.

Evidence · text

“define high-confidence, pit-constrained, free-milling silver ounces at Joaquin”

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: The company says Cerro Leon is within the same structural corridor as AngloGold Ashanti’s Cerro Vanguardia mine.

Evidence · text

“within the same structural corridor that is host to AngloGold Ashanti’s world-class Cerro Vanguardia mine”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 94. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (80)

JDD006-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD006-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
USL

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14 m
From
99 m
To
113 m
Intercept Depth
99 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD006-25:99-113
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
La Negra (infill)
Easting
458731
Northing
4677367
CRS
UTM zone 19S
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, chromium, antimony, mercury

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
70
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
40
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Low gold tenor within the infill drilling set.

Positive factors

  • Reported within the broader infill program, so it still contributes to continuity data.
  • The interval is not barren and carries silver equivalent above cut-off.

Negative factors

  • Gold grade is very low at 0.04 g/t over 14m.
  • This is an infill result rather than a discovery step-out.
  • True width not stated.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

JDD006-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD006-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
USL

Geometry

Grade
67
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14 m
From
99 m
To
113 m
Intercept Depth
99 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD006-25:99-113
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
La Negra (infill)
Easting
458731
Northing
4677367
CRS
UTM zone 19S
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, chromium, antimony, mercury

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
70
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
40
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Moderate silver interval in infill drilling, relevant mainly for continuity.

Positive factors

  • 14m interval carries 67 g/t Ag and contributes to the infill dataset.
  • The assay is above cut-off and helps support continuity.
  • AgEq assumptions are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • This is an infill result, not a new discovery.
  • Grade is moderate and the interval is downhole width only.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

La Negra (infill)Joaquin North · goldGrade: 14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 113 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
La Negra (infill)
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
113 m
From
-14 m
To
99 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
La Negra (infill):-14-99
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
67
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1582.0 g/t·m is exceptional (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 14 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“La Negra (infill) JDD006-25 99 113 14 0.04 67 70 983”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · La Negra (infill) · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

La Negra (infill)Joaquin North · silverGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 113 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
La Negra (infill)
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
113 m
From
-14 m
To
99 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
La Negra (infill):-14-99
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
67
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“La Negra (infill) JDD006-25 99 113 14 0.04 67 70 983”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · La Negra (infill) · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

La Negra (infill)Joaquin North · goldGrade: 17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 52 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
La Negra (infill)
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
52 m
From
-17 m
To
35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
La Negra (infill):-17-35
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
74
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 884.0 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 17 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“17”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · La Negra (infill) · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

La Negra (infill)Joaquin North · silverGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 52 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
La Negra (infill)
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
52 m
From
-17 m
To
35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
La Negra (infill):-17-35
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
74
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.08 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.08 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.08”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · La Negra (infill) · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

La Negra (infill)Joaquin North · goldGrade: 1.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
La Negra (infill)
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
1.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.3 m
From
70 m
To
74.3 m
Intercept Depth
70 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
La Negra (infill):70-74.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
742
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.41 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.41 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“And 70 74.3 4.3 1.41 629 742 3189”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · La Negra (infill) · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

La Negra (infill)Joaquin North · silverGrade: 629Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
La Negra (infill)
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
629
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.3 m
From
70 m
To
74.3 m
Intercept Depth
70 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
La Negra (infill):70-74.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
742
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 629 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2704.7 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 629 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“And 70 74.3 4.3 1.41 629 742 3189”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · La Negra (infill) · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD008-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD008-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.75 m
From
49.25 m
To
60 m
Intercept Depth
49.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD008-25:49.25-60
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
145
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.07 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD008-25 49.25 60 10.75 0.07 139 145 1554”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD008-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD008-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 139Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD008-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
139
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.75 m
From
49.25 m
To
60 m
Intercept Depth
49.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD008-25:49.25-60
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
145
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 139 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1494.3 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD008-25 49.25 60 10.75 0.07 139 145 1554”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD008-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD008-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD008-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.35 m
From
70 m
To
83.35 m
Intercept Depth
70 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD008-25:70-83.35
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
109
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.25 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“And 70 83.35 13.35 0.25 89 109 1455”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD008-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD008-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD008-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
89
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.35 m
From
70 m
To
83.35 m
Intercept Depth
70 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD008-25:70-83.35
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
109
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 89 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1188.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“And 70 83.35 13.35 0.25 89 109 1455”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD008-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD008-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD008-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.38
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.4 m
From
92.1 m
To
95.5 m
Intercept Depth
92.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD008-25:92.1-95.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
146
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.38 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.38 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“And 92.1 95.5 3.4 0.38 116 146 498”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD008-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD008-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 116Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD008-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
116
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.4 m
From
92.1 m
To
95.5 m
Intercept Depth
92.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD008-25:92.1-95.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
146
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 116 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 394.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“And 92.1 95.5 3.4 0.38 116 146 498”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD008-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD009-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD009-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12 m
From
10 m
To
22 m
Intercept Depth
10 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD009-25:10-22
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
324
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.06 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD009-25 10 22 12 0.06 319 324 3886”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD009-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD009-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 319Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD009-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
319
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12 m
From
10 m
To
22 m
Intercept Depth
10 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD009-25:10-22
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
324
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 319 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3828.0 g/t·m is strong.

Positive factors

  • 319 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD009-25 10 22 12 0.06 319 324 3886”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD009-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD009-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD009-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.4 m
From
29.6 m
To
35 m
Intercept Depth
29.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD009-25:29.6-35
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
284
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.33 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.33 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“And 29.6 35 5.4 0.33 258 284 1536”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD009-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD009-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 258Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD009-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
258
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.4 m
From
29.6 m
To
35 m
Intercept Depth
29.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD009-25:29.6-35
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
284
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 258 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1393.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 258 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“And 29.6 35 5.4 0.33 258 284 1536”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD009-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD010-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD010-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11 m
From
26 m
To
37 m
Intercept Depth
26 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD010-25:26-37
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
85
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.23 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD010-25 26 37 11 0.23 67 85 939”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD010-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD010-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD010-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
67
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11 m
From
26 m
To
37 m
Intercept Depth
26 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD010-25:26-37
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
85
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 67 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 737.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD010-25 26 37 11 0.23 67 85 939”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD010-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD010-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD010-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13 m
From
42 m
To
55 m
Intercept Depth
42 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD010-25:42-55
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
90
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.06 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“And 42 55 13 0.06 85 90 1167”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD010-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD010-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD010-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13 m
From
42 m
To
55 m
Intercept Depth
42 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD010-25:42-55
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
90
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 85 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1105.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“And 42 55 13 0.06 85 90 1167”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD010-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD011-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD011-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
27 m
To
32 m
Intercept Depth
27 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD011-25:27-32
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
141
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD011-25 27 32 5 0.01 140 141 704”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD011-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD011-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 140Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD011-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
140
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
27 m
To
32 m
Intercept Depth
27 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD011-25:27-32
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
141
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 140 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 700.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD011-25 27 32 5 0.01 140 141 704”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD011-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD011-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD011-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
50 m
To
53 m
Intercept Depth
50 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD011-25:50-53
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
267
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.43 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.43 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“And 50 53 3 0.43 233 267 802”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD011-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD011-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 233Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD011-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
233
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
50 m
To
53 m
Intercept Depth
50 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD011-25:50-53
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
267
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 233 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 699.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 233 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“And 50 53 3 0.43 233 267 802”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD011-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD012-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD012-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20 m
From
48 m
To
68 m
Intercept Depth
48 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD012-25:48-68
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
90
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.09 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD012-25 48 68 20 0.09 83 90 1804”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD012-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD012-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD012-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
83
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20 m
From
48 m
To
68 m
Intercept Depth
48 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD012-25:48-68
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
90
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 83 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1660.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD012-25 48 68 20 0.09 83 90 1804”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD012-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD014-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD014-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
74 m
To
80 m
Intercept Depth
74 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD014-25:74-80
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
262
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.7 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD014-25 74 80 6 0.7 206 262 1572”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD014-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD014-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 206Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD014-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
206
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
74 m
To
80 m
Intercept Depth
74 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD014-25:74-80
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
262
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 206 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1236.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 206 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD014-25 74 80 6 0.7 206 262 1572”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD014-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD015-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD015-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9 m
From
14 m
To
23 m
Intercept Depth
14 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD015-25:14-23
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
91
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.06 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD015-25 14 23 9 0.06 86 91 817”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD015-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD015-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD015-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9 m
From
14 m
To
23 m
Intercept Depth
14 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD015-25:14-23
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
91
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 86 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 774.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD015-25 14 23 9 0.06 86 91 817”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD015-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD015-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD015-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17 m
From
28 m
To
45 m
Intercept Depth
28 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD015-25:28-45
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
83
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.14 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.14 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“And 28 45 17 0.14 72 83 1414”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD015-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD015-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD015-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17 m
From
28 m
To
45 m
Intercept Depth
28 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD015-25:28-45
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
83
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 72 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1224.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“And 28 45 17 0.14 72 83 1414”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD015-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD016-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 2.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD016-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
2.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.9 m
From
79.6 m
To
82.5 m
Intercept Depth
79.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD016-25:79.6-82.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
573
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.28 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.28 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD016-25 79.6 82.5 2.9 2.28 391 573 1663”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD016-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD016-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 391Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD016-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
391
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.9 m
From
79.6 m
To
82.5 m
Intercept Depth
79.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD016-25:79.6-82.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
573
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 391 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1133.9 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 391 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD016-25 79.6 82.5 2.9 2.28 391 573 1663”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD016-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD018-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD018-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
23 m
From
197 m
To
220 m
Intercept Depth
197 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD018-25:197-220
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
134
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.19 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.19 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD018-25 197 220 23 0.19 119 134 3087”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD018-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD018-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 119Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD018-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
119
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
23 m
From
197 m
To
220 m
Intercept Depth
197 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD018-25:197-220
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
134
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 119 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2737.0 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD018-25 197 220 23 0.19 119 134 3087”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD018-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

La Negra SEJoaquin North · goldGrade: 42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 144 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
La Negra SE
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
42
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
144 m
From
-42 m
To
102 m
Hole Depth
376 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
La Negra SE:-42-102
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
43
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 42 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6048.0 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 42 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“La Negra SE JDD020-25 102 144 42 0.12 43 53 2209”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · La Negra SE · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

La Negra SEJoaquin North · silverGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 144 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
La Negra SE
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
144 m
From
-42 m
To
102 m
Hole Depth
376 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
La Negra SE:-42-102
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
43
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 17.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.12 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“La Negra SE JDD020-25 102 144 42 0.12 43 53 2209”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · La Negra SE · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

La Negra (infill)Joaquin North · goldGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 37 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
La Negra (infill)
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
37 m
From
-5 m
To
32 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
La Negra (infill):-5-32
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
124
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 185.0 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 5 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“La Negra (infill) JDD021-25 32 37 5 0.08 124 130 652”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · La Negra (infill) · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

La Negra (infill)Joaquin North · silverGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 37 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
La Negra (infill)
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
37 m
From
-5 m
To
32 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
La Negra (infill):-5-32
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
124
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.08 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.08 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“La Negra (infill) JDD021-25 32 37 5 0.08 124 130 652”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · La Negra (infill) · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

La Negra (infill)Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
La Negra (infill)
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
63 m
To
70 m
Intercept Depth
63 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
La Negra (infill):63-70
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
171
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.07 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“And 63 70 7 0.07 165 171 1194”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · La Negra (infill) · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

La Negra (infill)Joaquin North · silverGrade: 165Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
La Negra (infill)
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
165
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
63 m
To
70 m
Intercept Depth
63 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
La Negra (infill):63-70
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
171
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 165 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1155.0 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“And 63 70 7 0.07 165 171 1194”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · La Negra (infill) · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD022-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD022-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17 m
From
28 m
To
45 m
Intercept Depth
28 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD022-25:28-45
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
181
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.12 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD022-25 28 45 17 0.12 171 181 3070”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD022-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD022-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 171Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD022-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
171
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17 m
From
28 m
To
45 m
Intercept Depth
28 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD022-25:28-45
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
181
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 171 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2907.0 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD022-25 28 45 17 0.12 171 181 3070”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD022-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD022-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD022-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11 m
From
49 m
To
60 m
Intercept Depth
49 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD022-25:49-60
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
151
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“And 49 60 11 0.03 149 151 1665”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD022-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD022-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 149Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD022-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
149
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11 m
From
49 m
To
60 m
Intercept Depth
49 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD022-25:49-60
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
151
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 149 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1639.0 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“And 49 60 11 0.03 149 151 1665”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD022-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD022-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD022-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
106 m
To
116 m
Intercept Depth
106 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD022-25:106-116
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
120
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.14 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.14 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“And 106 116 10 0.14 109 120 1202”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD022-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD022-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 109Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD022-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
109
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
106 m
To
116 m
Intercept Depth
106 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD022-25:106-116
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
120
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 109 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1090.0 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“And 106 116 10 0.14 109 120 1202”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD022-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD024-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD024-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22 m
From
4 m
To
26 m
Intercept Depth
4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD024-25:4-26
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
289
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.15 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.15 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD024-25 4 26 22 0.15 277 289 6358”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD024-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD024-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 277Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD024-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
277
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22 m
From
4 m
To
26 m
Intercept Depth
4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD024-25:4-26
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
289
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 277 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6094.0 g/t·m is strong.

Positive factors

  • 277 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD024-25 4 26 22 0.15 277 289 6358”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD024-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD024-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD024-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
50 m
To
56 m
Intercept Depth
50 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD024-25:50-56
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
112
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“And 50 56 6 0.03 110 112 674”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD024-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD024-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 110Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD024-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
110
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
50 m
To
56 m
Intercept Depth
50 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD024-25:50-56
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
112
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 110 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 660.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“And 50 56 6 0.03 110 112 674”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD024-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD026-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD026-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21 m
From
40 m
To
61 m
Intercept Depth
40 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD026-25:40-61
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
82
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD026-25 40 61 21 0.1 74 82 1722”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD026-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD026-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD026-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
74
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21 m
From
40 m
To
61 m
Intercept Depth
40 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD026-25:40-61
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
82
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 74 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1554.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD026-25 40 61 21 0.1 74 82 1722”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD026-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD027-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD027-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.4 m
From
113 m
To
116.4 m
Intercept Depth
113 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD027-25:113-116.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
97
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.06 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD027-25 113 116.4 3.4 0.06 92 97 329”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD027-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD027-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD027-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.4 m
From
113 m
To
116.4 m
Intercept Depth
113 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD027-25:113-116.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
97
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 92 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 312.8 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD027-25 113 116.4 3.4 0.06 92 97 329”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD027-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD029-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD029-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
112 m
To
116 m
Intercept Depth
112 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD029-25:112-116
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
226
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD029-25 112 116 4 0.2 210 226 904”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD029-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD029-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 210Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD029-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
210
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
112 m
To
116 m
Intercept Depth
112 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD029-25:112-116
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
226
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 210 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 840.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 210 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD029-25 112 116 4 0.2 210 226 904”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD029-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD030-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD030-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
From
82.1 m
To
83 m
Intercept Depth
82.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD030-25:82.1-83
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
554
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.15 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.15 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD030-25 82.1 83 0.9 0.15 542 554 499”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD030-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD030-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 542Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD030-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
542
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
From
82.1 m
To
83 m
Intercept Depth
82.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD030-25:82.1-83
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
554
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 542 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 487.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 542 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD030-25 82.1 83 0.9 0.15 542 554 499”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD030-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD030-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD030-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.55 m
From
88 m
To
95.55 m
Intercept Depth
88 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD030-25:88-95.55
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
239
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.05 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“And 88 95.55 7.55 0.05 235 239 1804”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD030-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD030-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 235Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD030-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
235
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.55 m
From
88 m
To
95.55 m
Intercept Depth
88 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD030-25:88-95.55
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
239
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 235 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1774.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 235 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“And 88 95.55 7.55 0.05 235 239 1804”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD030-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD032-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD032-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
122.8 m
To
135 m
Intercept Depth
122.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD032-25:122.8-135
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
83
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.19 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.19 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD032-25 122.8 135 12.2 0.19 68 83 1015”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD032-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD032-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD032-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
122.8 m
To
135 m
Intercept Depth
122.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD032-25:122.8-135
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
83
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 68 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 829.6 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD032-25 122.8 135 12.2 0.19 68 83 1015”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD032-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD033-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD033-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.5 m
From
124 m
To
140.5 m
Intercept Depth
124 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD033-25:124-140.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
187
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.17 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.17 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD033-25 124 140.5 16.5 0.17 173 187 3079”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD033-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD033-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 173Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD033-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
173
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.5 m
From
124 m
To
140.5 m
Intercept Depth
124 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD033-25:124-140.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
187
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 173 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2854.5 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD033-25 124 140.5 16.5 0.17 173 187 3079”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD033-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD034-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD034-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
71 m
To
78 m
Intercept Depth
71 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD034-25:71-78
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
86
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.13 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.13 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD034-25 71 78 7 0.13 76 86 605”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD034-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD034-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD034-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
76
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
71 m
To
78 m
Intercept Depth
71 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD034-25:71-78
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
86
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 76 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 532.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD034-25 71 78 7 0.13 76 86 605”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD034-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD035-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD035-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.5 m
From
167.5 m
To
170 m
Intercept Depth
167.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD035-25:167.5-170
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
113
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.75 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.75 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD035-25 167.5 170 2.5 0.75 53 113 283”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD035-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD035-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD035-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.5 m
From
167.5 m
To
170 m
Intercept Depth
167.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD035-25:167.5-170
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
113
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 53 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 132.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD035-25 167.5 170 2.5 0.75 53 113 283”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD035-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

La Negra SEJoaquin North · goldGrade: 81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 120 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
La Negra SE
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
81
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
120 m
From
-81 m
To
39 m
Hole Depth
376 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
La Negra SE:-81-39
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
60
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 81 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9720.0 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 81 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“La Negra SE JDD037-25 39 120 81 0.92 60 148 12,014”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · La Negra SE · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

La Negra SEJoaquin North · silverGrade: 0.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 120 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
La Negra SE
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
0.92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
120 m
From
-81 m
To
39 m
Hole Depth
376 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
La Negra SE:-81-39
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
60
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.92 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 110.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.92 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“La Negra SE JDD037-25 39 120 81 0.92 60 148 12,014”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · La Negra SE · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IncJoaquin North · goldGrade: 6.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Inc
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
6.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.8 m
From
68.2 m
To
75 m
Intercept Depth
68.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Inc:68.2-75
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
717
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.78 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 46.1 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Inc 68.2 75 6.8 6.78 66 717 4875”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · Inc · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IncJoaquin North · silverGrade: 66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Inc
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
66
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.8 m
From
68.2 m
To
75 m
Intercept Depth
68.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Inc:68.2-75
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
717
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 66 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 448.8 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Inc 68.2 75 6.8 6.78 66 717 4875”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · Inc · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD041-25Joaquin North · goldGrade: 2.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 44.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD041-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
2.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
44.9 m
From
81.1 m
To
126 m
Intercept Depth
81.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD041-25:81.1-126
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
259
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.19 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 98.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD041-25 81.1 126 44.9 2.19 49 259 11,640”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD041-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD041-25Joaquin North · silverGrade: 49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 44.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD041-25
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
44.9 m
From
81.1 m
To
126 m
Intercept Depth
81.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD041-25:81.1-126
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
259
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 49 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2200.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“JDD041-25 81.1 126 44.9 2.19 49 259 11,640”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · JDD041-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Inc.Joaquin North · goldGrade: 8.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Inc.
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
8.84
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.3 m
From
97.5 m
To
104.8 m
Intercept Depth
97.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Inc.:97.5-104.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
888
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.84 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 64.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 8.84 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Inc. 97.5 104.8 7.3 8.84 39 888 6480”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · Inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Inc.Joaquin North · silverGrade: 39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Inc.
Project
Joaquin North
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina

Geometry

Grade
39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.3 m
From
97.5 m
To
104.8 m
Intercept Depth
97.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Inc.:97.5-104.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

CRS
UTM zone 19S

QA/QC

Laboratory
Alex Stewart Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
888
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 39 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 284.7 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“Inc. 97.5 104.8 7.3 8.84 39 888 6480”

Context: Table 1: Significant drill hole assay results · Inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Resource Estimates (14)

indicatedCerro Leon · silverGrade: 95Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 28.9Contained Unit: mozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2013-02-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
Resource group id
resource:cc1a5fb98dec29b25a89
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Grade
95
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
28.9
Contained Unit
moz

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
190
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“95”

Context: 9.4

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

indicatedCerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 165Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2013-02-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
Resource group id
resource:cc1a5fb98dec29b25a89
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Grade
0.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
165
Contained Unit
koz

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
190
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.54”

Context: 9.4

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

indicatedCerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 119Contained Unit: mlbView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2013-02-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
Resource group id
resource:cc1a5fb98dec29b25a89
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
119
Contained Unit
mlb

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
190
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.57”

Context: 9.4

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

indicatedCerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.95Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 199Contained Unit: mlbView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2013-02-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
Resource group id
resource:cc1a5fb98dec29b25a89
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Grade
0.95
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
199
Contained Unit
mlb

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
190
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.95”

Context: 9.4

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredCerro Leon · silverGrade: 62Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 62Contained Unit: mozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2013-02-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
Resource group id
resource:fe942fe2699cb1ac21d6
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Grade
62
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
62
Contained Unit
moz

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
161
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“62”

Context: 31

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredCerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 548Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2013-02-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
Resource group id
resource:fe942fe2699cb1ac21d6
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Grade
0.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
548
Contained Unit
koz

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
161
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.55”

Context: 31

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredCerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 364Contained Unit: mlbView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2013-02-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
Resource group id
resource:fe942fe2699cb1ac21d6
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Grade
0.54
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
364
Contained Unit
mlb

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
161
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.54”

Context: 31

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredCerro Leon · zincGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 778Contained Unit: mlbView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2013-02-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
Resource group id
resource:fe942fe2699cb1ac21d6
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
778
Contained Unit
mlb

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
161
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“1.1”

Context: 31

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

indicatedJoaquin · silverTonnes: 15700000Grade: 128Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 65.2Contained Unit: mozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2013-02-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
Resource group id
resource:f10ccbc7ca20216c2b77
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
15700000
Grade
128
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
65.2
Contained Unit
moz

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
139
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“128”

Context: 15.7

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

indicatedJoaquin · goldTonnes: 15700000Grade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 61.1Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2013-02-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
Resource group id
resource:f10ccbc7ca20216c2b77
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
15700000
Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
61.1
Contained Unit
koz

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
139
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 15.7

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredJoaquin · silverTonnes: 1000000Grade: 100Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3.1Contained Unit: mozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2013-02-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
Resource group id
resource:3ce49c91ddb099c791ff
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1000000
Grade
100
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
3.1
Contained Unit
moz

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
111
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“100”

Context: 1

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredJoaquin · goldTonnes: 1000000Grade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3.7Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2013-02-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
Resource group id
resource:3ce49c91ddb099c791ff
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1000000
Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
3.7
Contained Unit
koz

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
111
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 1

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredJoaquin · silverTonnes: 16700000Grade: 126Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 68.3Contained Unit: mozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2013-02-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
Resource group id
resource:61afd92e6ae79bc81e26
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
16700000
Grade
126
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
68.3
Contained Unit
moz

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
137
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“126”

Context: 16.7

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredJoaquin · goldTonnes: 16700000Grade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 64.2Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2013-02-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
Resource group id
resource:61afd92e6ae79bc81e26
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
16700000
Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
64.2
Contained Unit
koz

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
137
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 16.7

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.