# Dynasty Gold Selected for PDAC 2026 Gold Forum Presentation and Exhibits at PDAC Booth 2832, March 1-4 Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/dynasty-gold-selected-for-pdac-2026-gold-forum-presentation-and-exhibits-at-pdac--8d962cad-9ee4-4314-a371-678faef12665 Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/DYG/news/5594515320940812/dynasty-gold-selected-for-pdac-2026-gold-forum-presentation-and-exhibits-at-pdac Publisher: tmx Original announcement: 2026-02-24T15:34:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: Unknown date Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date - Company: Dynasty Gold Corp. - Ticker: DYG - Exchange: TSX - Region: Ontario - Primary commodity: Gold - Secondary commodities: None reported - Document categories: Drill results, Other - Extracted: 2026-09-17 19:14:23 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.40 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Dynasty Gold Corp. has been selected to present at the PDAC 2026 Gold Forum regarding its Thundercloud gold project in Ontario. The company will discuss recent 2025 discovery drill results and upcoming 2026 drilling plans. Reasoning: The document is primarily a corporate announcement regarding a conference presentation, though it contains historical drill results and project updates as context. - Positive factor: Selection for PDAC Gold Forum presentation - Positive factor: Mention of high-grade historical intercepts - Positive factor: Mention of 2025 discovery extending mineralized corridor Facts used in scoring: 4 ## Classification and evidence **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Story-specific tag Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: Mentions the Golden Repeat project shares geological features with the Midas Gold mine and is surrounded by large-scale operating mines. Evidence · text > shares similar geological features as the Midas Gold mine and is surrounded by a number of large-scale operating mines ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 4. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Drill Results (4) ### Fact 1 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/dynasty-gold-selected-for-pdac-2026-gold-forum-presentation-and-exhibits-at-pdac--8d962cad-9ee4-4314-a371-678faef12665#fact-drill-facts-0) Thundercloud · gold Historical result Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id #### Identity - Project: Thundercloud - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_on - Reported Region: canada\_on - Ticker: DYG #### Geometry - Grade: 72.2 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 6.5 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-02-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: 72.2 g/t over 6.5m is an exceptional grade for an open-pit gold project. - Positive factor: Exceptionally high grade Evidence · text > 72.2 g/t over 6.5m #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 2 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/dynasty-gold-selected-for-pdac-2026-gold-forum-presentation-and-exhibits-at-pdac--8d962cad-9ee4-4314-a371-678faef12665#fact-drill-facts-1) Thundercloud · gold Historical result Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id #### Identity - Project: Thundercloud - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_on - Reported Region: canada\_on - Ticker: DYG #### Geometry - Grade: 65.2 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 3 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-02-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: 65.2 g/t is an exceptionally high grade. - Positive factor: Exceptionally high grade Evidence · text > 65.2 g/t over 3m #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 3 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/dynasty-gold-selected-for-pdac-2026-gold-forum-presentation-and-exhibits-at-pdac--8d962cad-9ee4-4314-a371-678faef12665#fact-drill-facts-2) Thundercloud · gold Historical result Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id #### Identity - Project: Thundercloud - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_on - Reported Region: canada\_on - Ticker: DYG #### Geometry - Grade: 10.4 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 6 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-02-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: 10.4 g/t is a strong grade for an open-pit gold project. - Positive factor: Strong grade Evidence · text > 10.4 g/t over 6m #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 4 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/dynasty-gold-selected-for-pdac-2026-gold-forum-presentation-and-exhibits-at-pdac--8d962cad-9ee4-4314-a371-678faef12665#fact-drill-facts-3) Thundercloud · gold Historical result Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id #### Identity - Project: Thundercloud - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_on - Reported Region: canada\_on - Ticker: DYG #### Geometry - Grade: 1.2 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 130.5 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-02-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: While grade is lower, the 130.5m width is a significant broad intercept. - Positive factor: Broad intercept Evidence · text > 1.2 g/t over 130.5m #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.