# E3 Lithium Files 2025 Year-End Financial Results and Disclosure Documents

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/e3-lithium-files-2025-year-end-financial-results-and-disclosure-documents--66f11790-670e-4f32-8395-90167b070370

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/ETL/news/6359690802249610/e3-lithium-files-2025-year-end-financial-results-and-disclosure-documents

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2026-04-09T07:15:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: E3 Lithium Ltd.

- Ticker: ETL

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Alberta

- Primary commodity: Lithium

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Resource update, Other

- Extracted: 2026-09-13 22:44:32 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.00 · Neutral

## Minestarters Atlas summary

E3 Lithium has filed its consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025, along with the MD&amp;A and AIF. The release also provides a summary of existing mineral resources and reserves at the Clearwater and Garrington projects.

Reasoning: Routine filing of year-end financial statements and MD&amp;A; mentions of resources/reserves are historical references to previous technical reports.

Facts used in scoring: 5

## Classification and evidence

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Story-specific tag

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: The resource and reserve figures provided are historical references to technical reports from 2024 and 2025.

Evidence · text

> The Clearwater Project NI 43-101 Pre-Feasibility Study, effective June 20, 2024, identified 16.2 Mt LCE

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 5. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (5)

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/e3-lithium-files-2025-year-end-financial-results-and-disclosure-documents--66f11790-670e-4f32-8395-90167b070370#fact-resource-facts-0)

Clearwater Project · lithium

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Clearwater Project
- Commodity: lithium
- Region: canada\_ab
- Reported Region: Alberta
- Ticker: ETL

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Resource group id: resource:789119d714b165ca2da6

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 21200000
- Grade Unit: LCE
- Contained Metal: 21.2
- Contained Unit: mt

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2024-06-20T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a restatement of the Clearwater Project resource from a June 20, 2024 report.

- Negative factor: Stale Data Re-release

Evidence · text

> 21.2 million tonnes of lithium carbonate equivalent \(LCE\) Measured and Indicated

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/e3-lithium-files-2025-year-end-financial-results-and-disclosure-documents--66f11790-670e-4f32-8395-90167b070370#fact-resource-facts-1)

Clearwater Project · lithium

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Clearwater Project
- Commodity: lithium
- Region: canada\_ab
- Reported Region: Alberta
- Ticker: ETL

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Resource group id: resource:ad71ef745521448a1eaa

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 300000
- Grade Unit: LCE

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2024-06-20T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a restatement of the Clearwater Project resource from a June 20, 2024 report.

- Negative factor: Stale Data Re-release

Evidence · text

> 0.3 Mt LCE Inferred mineral resources

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

### probable

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/e3-lithium-files-2025-year-end-financial-results-and-disclosure-documents--66f11790-670e-4f32-8395-90167b070370#fact-resource-facts-2)

Clearwater Project · lithium

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Clearwater Project
- Commodity: lithium
- Region: canada\_ab
- Reported Region: Alberta
- Ticker: ETL

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: reserve
- Resource group id: resource:86f097065e01a4d89312

#### Resource Data

- Category: probable
- Tonnes: 1130000
- Grade Unit: LCE

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2024-06-20T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a restatement of the Clearwater Project reserve from a June 20, 2024 report.

- Negative factor: Stale Data Re-release

Evidence · text

> 1.13 Mt LCE proven and probable mineral reserve

#### Tags used in scoring

**Probable Reserve**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/e3-lithium-files-2025-year-end-financial-results-and-disclosure-documents--66f11790-670e-4f32-8395-90167b070370#fact-resource-facts-3)

Garrington District · lithium

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Garrington District
- Commodity: lithium
- Region: canada\_ab
- Reported Region: Alberta
- Ticker: ETL

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Resource group id: resource:dfe5e4996be37ec01904

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 5000000
- Grade Unit: LCE

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2025-06-25T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a restatement of the Garrington District resource from a June 25, 2025 report.

- Negative factor: Stale Data Re-release

Evidence · text

> 5.0 Mt LCE \(measured and indicated\)

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/e3-lithium-files-2025-year-end-financial-results-and-disclosure-documents--66f11790-670e-4f32-8395-90167b070370#fact-resource-facts-4)

Garrington District · lithium

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Garrington District
- Commodity: lithium
- Region: canada\_ab
- Reported Region: Alberta
- Ticker: ETL

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Resource group id: resource:ddd315bdc557b53a6ca9

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 300000
- Grade Unit: LCE

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2025-06-25T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a restatement of the Garrington District resource from a June 25, 2025 report.

- Negative factor: Stale Data Re-release

Evidence · text

> 0.3 Mt LCE \(inferred\)

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
