# Eagle Plains and Xcite Define Prospective Geophysical Trends at Black Bay, Lorado and Gulch Uranium Projects, SK. Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/eagle-plains-and-xcite-define-prospective-geophysical-trends-at-black-bay-lorado--022e1095-e258-41ef-8953-66934f98b584 Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/EPL/news/5887295436254170/eagle-plains-and-xcite-define-prospective-geophysical-trends-at-black-bay-lorado Publisher: tmx Original announcement: 2026-06-11T10:00:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: Unknown date Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date - Company: Eagle Plains Resources Ltd. - Ticker: EPL - Exchange: TSX - Region: Saskatchewan - Primary commodity: Uranium - Secondary commodities: None reported - Document categories: Drill results, Other - Extracted: 2026-09-13 22:32:30 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.40 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Eagle Plains Resources has announced initial geophysical results from a VTEM Plus airborne survey covering its Black Bay, Lorado, and Gulch uranium projects in Saskatchewan. The survey identified conductive and magnetic trends that align with known structural controls for uranium mineralization in the Beaverlodge district. Reasoning: The announcement reports geophysical survey results that define prospective structures, supported by the mention of high-grade historical data, though no new assays were reported. - Positive factor: Geophysical survey identifies structural trends consistent with known mineralization - Positive factor: Historical high-grade grab samples and drill intercepts cited - Positive factor: Projects located in a prolific uranium district with past production - Negative factor: Historical data used is unverified by a QP - Negative factor: Current results are geophysical interpretations, not new assays Facts used in scoring: 4 ## Classification and evidence **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: The release mentions a Qualified Person \(Charles C. Downie, P.Geo.\) has reviewed and approved the technical disclosure. Evidence · text > Charles C. Downie, P.Geo., a "qualified person" for the purposes of National Instrument 43-101... has reviewed and approved the scientific and technical disclosure **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: The release explicitly cautions that historical results were not verified or confirmed by a Qualified Person. Evidence · text > Management cautions that historical results were collected and reported by past operators and have not been verified nor confirmed by a Qualified Person ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 4. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Drill Results (4) ### Fact 1 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/eagle-plains-and-xcite-define-prospective-geophysical-trends-at-black-bay-lorado--022e1095-e258-41ef-8953-66934f98b584#fact-drill-facts-0) Black Bay · uranium Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Black Bay - Commodity: uranium - Region: canada\_sk - Reported Region: Saskatchewan - Ticker: EPL #### Geometry - Grade: 16.74 - Grade Unit: % U3O8 #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-06-11T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical grab sample at 12.8m depth reported 16.74% U3O8. - Positive factor: Exceptionally high grade - Negative factor: Unverified historical grab sample - Negative factor: Not representative of whole property Evidence · text > Grab samples from historical drill core at 12.8m depth returned 16.74% and 9.64% U3O8 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 2 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/eagle-plains-and-xcite-define-prospective-geophysical-trends-at-black-bay-lorado--022e1095-e258-41ef-8953-66934f98b584#fact-drill-facts-1) Black Bay · uranium Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Black Bay - Commodity: uranium - Region: canada\_sk - Reported Region: Saskatchewan - Ticker: EPL #### Geometry - Grade: 9.64 - Grade Unit: % U3O8 #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-06-11T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical grab sample at 12.8m depth reported 9.64% U3O8. - Positive factor: Exceptionally high grade - Negative factor: Unverified historical grab sample Evidence · text > Grab samples from historical drill core at 12.8m depth returned 16.74% and 9.64% U3O8 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 3 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/eagle-plains-and-xcite-define-prospective-geophysical-trends-at-black-bay-lorado--022e1095-e258-41ef-8953-66934f98b584#fact-drill-facts-2) Lorado · uranium Historical result Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id #### Identity - Project: Lorado - Commodity: uranium - Region: canada\_sk - Reported Region: canada\_sk - Ticker: EPL #### Geometry - Grade: 0.79 - Grade Unit: % - Intercept: 1.88 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-06-11T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical drilling at Pitche Zone returned 0.79% U3O8 over 1.88m. - Positive factor: Economic grade for uranium - Negative factor: Unverified historical drilling - Negative factor: Narrow intercept Evidence · text > Drilling at Pitche Zone returned 0.79% U3O8 over 1.88m #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 4 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/eagle-plains-and-xcite-define-prospective-geophysical-trends-at-black-bay-lorado--022e1095-e258-41ef-8953-66934f98b584#fact-drill-facts-3) Gulch · uranium Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Gulch - Commodity: uranium - Region: canada\_sk - Reported Region: Saskatchewan - Ticker: EPL #### Geometry - Grade: 0.37 - Grade Unit: % U3O8 - Intercept: 3 m #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-06-11T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical trenching returned up to 0.37% U3O8 over 3m. - Positive factor: Mineralization identified via trenching - Negative factor: Unverified historical trenching Evidence · text > Trenching returned up to 0.37% U3O8 over 3m #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.