Eagle Plains Reports Additional Results from Drilling at the Don Lake Uranium Project, Saskatchewan
Original announcement by orestocks on
- Company
- Eagle Plains Resources Ltd.
- Ticker
- EPL.V
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- Saskatchewan
- Primary commodity
- Uranium
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-17 08:48:05 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Eagle Plains Resources announced additional drill results from its Don Lake Uranium Project in Saskatchewan, reporting multiple intervals of anomalous radioactivity from the B and C Zones. Highlights include 0.6m averaging 12473 cps in DN26009 and 0.7m averaging 10403 cps in DN26008. The company noted that these are radioactivity counts, with geochemical assays pending, and true thicknesses are yet to be determined.
Reasoning: Eagle Plains reported additional drill results from the Don Lake Uranium Project, intersecting multiple zones of anomalous radioactivity with high CPS values. While these are promising indicators, the lack of geochemical assays and true width determinations reduces the immediate materiality and confidence of the results. The program is exploration-focused, testing extensions and new targets.
Positive factors
- Multiple intervals of anomalous radioactivity intersected in new drilling
- High CPS values in several intercepts, indicating potential uranium mineralization
- QP sign-off and detailed description of radioactivity measurement methods
- Drilling extends known mineralization and tests new targets
Negative factors
- Results are radioactivity counts (CPS) only; geochemical assays are pending
- True thicknesses cannot yet be determined, implying downhole widths may overstate true thickness
- No cut-off grade explicitly stated for compositing of anomalous intervals
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 32
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 32. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (32)
DN26005Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 2898Grade Unit: cpsIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DN26005
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 2898
- Grade Unit
- cps
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 68.03 m
- To
- 69.33 m
- Hole Depth
- 116 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68.03 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DN26005:68.03-69.33
Location
- Location
- Don Main B Zone
- Azimuth
- 256 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows anomalous radioactivity, which is a positive indicator for uranium mineralization, but the lack of assays and true width limits immediate confidence.
Positive factors
- Anomalous radioactivity detected
- QP sign-off on technical information
Negative factors
- Assays pending (CPS is a proxy)
- True thickness not determined
Evidence · text
“DN26005 1.3m averaging 2898 cps”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
DN26006Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 2656Grade Unit: cpsIntercept: 5.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DN26006
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 2656
- Grade Unit
- cps
- Intercept
- 5.5 m
- From
- 13.5 m
- To
- 19 m
- Hole Depth
- 120 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DN26006:13.5-19
Location
- Location
- Don Main B Zone
- Azimuth
- 256 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A notable intercept with anomalous radioactivity over a good width, indicating potential for uranium mineralization, but awaiting assays and true width.
Positive factors
- Anomalous radioactivity detected over a significant width
- QP sign-off on technical information
Negative factors
- Assays pending (CPS is a proxy)
- True thickness not determined
Evidence · text
“DN26006 5.5m averaging 2656cps”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
DN26008Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 10403Grade Unit: cpsIntercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DN26008
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 10403
- Grade Unit
- cps
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 22.03 m
- To
- 22.73 m
- Hole Depth
- 75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22.03 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DN26008:22.03-22.73
Location
- Location
- Don Main C Zone
- Azimuth
- 315 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very high anomalous radioactivity, which is a strong indicator for uranium mineralization, but assays and true width are still pending.
Positive factors
- High anomalous radioactivity detected
- QP sign-off on technical information
Negative factors
- Assays pending (CPS is a proxy)
- True thickness not determined
Evidence · text
“DN26008 0.7m averaging 10403 cps”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
DN26009Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 12473Grade Unit: cpsIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DN26009
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 12473
- Grade Unit
- cps
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 27.03 m
- To
- 27.63 m
- Hole Depth
- 114 m
- Intercept Depth
- 27.03 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DN26009:27.03-27.63
Location
- Location
- Don Main C Zone
- Azimuth
- 280 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows exceptionally high anomalous radioactivity, a very strong indicator for uranium mineralization, but final assays and true width are still needed for full assessment.
Positive factors
- Very high anomalous radioactivity detected
- QP sign-off on technical information
Negative factors
- Assays pending (CPS is a proxy)
- True thickness not determined
Evidence · text
“DN26009 0.6m averaging 12473 cps”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
DN26001Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 11571Grade Unit: cpsIntercept: 1.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DN26001
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 11571
- Grade Unit
- cps
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- A Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a previously announced high anomalous radioactivity intercept, indicating strong potential, but still awaiting assays and true width.
Positive factors
- High anomalous radioactivity detected
- QP sign-off on technical information
Negative factors
- Assays pending (CPS is a proxy)
- True thickness not determined
- Results previously announced
Evidence · text
“DN26001 1.9m averaging 11571 cps”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
DN26002Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 11753Grade Unit: cpsIntercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DN26002
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 11753
- Grade Unit
- cps
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- A Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a previously announced high anomalous radioactivity intercept, indicating strong potential, but still awaiting assays and true width.
Positive factors
- High anomalous radioactivity detected
- QP sign-off on technical information
Negative factors
- Assays pending (CPS is a proxy)
- True thickness not determined
- Results previously announced
Evidence · text
“DN26002 1.1m averaging 11753 cps”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
DN26003Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 2700Grade Unit: cpsIntercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DN26003
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 2700
- Grade Unit
- cps
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- A Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a previously announced anomalous radioactivity intercept, indicating potential, but still awaiting assays and true width.
Positive factors
- Anomalous radioactivity detected
- QP sign-off on technical information
Negative factors
- Assays pending (CPS is a proxy)
- True thickness not determined
- Results previously announced
Evidence · text
“DN26003 1.2m averaging 2700 cps”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
DN26004Don LakeView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DN26004
- Project
- Don Lake
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 111 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- Don Main B Zone
- Azimuth
- 213 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This hole reported no significant anomalous radioactivity, which is a negative result for exploration, though assays are still pending.
Positive factors
- QP sign-off on technical information
Negative factors
- No significant anomalous radioactivity reported
- Assays pending (CPS is a proxy)
- True thickness not determined
Evidence · table
“no significant anomalous radioactivity”
Context: DN26004
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
DN26006Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 6252Grade Unit: cpsIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DN26006
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 6252
- Grade Unit
- cps
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 13.8 m
- To
- 14.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 120 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13.8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DN26006:13.8-14.4
Location
- Location
- Don Main B Zone
- Azimuth
- 256 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This included intercept shows high anomalous radioactivity, a positive indicator for uranium mineralization, but assays and true width are pending.
Positive factors
- High anomalous radioactivity detected
- QP sign-off on technical information
Negative factors
- Assays pending (CPS is a proxy)
- True thickness not determined
Evidence · table
“6252”
Context: incl
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
DN26006Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 4090Grade Unit: cpsIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DN26006
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 4090
- Grade Unit
- cps
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 16.3 m
- To
- 17.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 120 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16.3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DN26006:16.3-17.2
Location
- Location
- Don Main B Zone
- Azimuth
- 256 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This included intercept shows anomalous radioactivity, a positive indicator for uranium mineralization, but assays and true width are pending.
Positive factors
- Anomalous radioactivity detected
- QP sign-off on technical information
Negative factors
- Assays pending (CPS is a proxy)
- True thickness not determined
Evidence · table
“4090”
Context: and incl
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
DN26006Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 3519Grade Unit: cpsIntercept: 0.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DN26006
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 3519
- Grade Unit
- cps
- Intercept
- 0.2 m
- From
- 91.1 m
- To
- 91.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 120 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DN26006:91.1-91.3
Location
- Location
- Don Main B Zone
- Azimuth
- 256 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow intercept shows anomalous radioactivity, a positive indicator for uranium mineralization, but assays and true width are pending.
Positive factors
- Anomalous radioactivity detected
- QP sign-off on technical information
Negative factors
- Assays pending (CPS is a proxy)
- True thickness not determined
- Narrow intercept
Evidence · table
“3519”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
DN26007Don LakeView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DN26007
- Project
- Don Lake
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 108 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- Don Main C Zone
- Azimuth
- 350 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This hole reported no significant anomalous radioactivity, which is a negative result for exploration, though assays are still pending.
Positive factors
- QP sign-off on technical information
Negative factors
- No significant anomalous radioactivity reported
- Assays pending (CPS is a proxy)
- True thickness not determined
Evidence · table
“no significant anomalous radioactivity”
Context: DN26007
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
DN26008Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 3518Grade Unit: cpsIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DN26008
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 3518
- Grade Unit
- cps
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- From
- 16.43 m
- To
- 18.03 m
- Hole Depth
- 75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16.43 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DN26008:16.43-18.03
Location
- Location
- Don Main C Zone
- Azimuth
- 315 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows anomalous radioactivity, which is a positive indicator for uranium mineralization, but the lack of assays and true width limits immediate confidence.
Positive factors
- Anomalous radioactivity detected
- QP sign-off on technical information
Negative factors
- Assays pending (CPS is a proxy)
- True thickness not determined
Evidence · table
“3518”
Context: DN26008
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
DN26008Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 7854Grade Unit: cpsIntercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DN26008
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 7854
- Grade Unit
- cps
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 17.63 m
- To
- 17.93 m
- Hole Depth
- 75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 17.63 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DN26008:17.63-17.93
Location
- Location
- Don Main C Zone
- Azimuth
- 315 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This included intercept shows high anomalous radioactivity, a positive indicator for uranium mineralization, but assays and true width are pending.
Positive factors
- High anomalous radioactivity detected
- QP sign-off on technical information
Negative factors
- Assays pending (CPS is a proxy)
- True thickness not determined
Evidence · table
“7854”
Context: incl
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
DN26008Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 21907Grade Unit: cpsIntercept: 0.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DN26008
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 21907
- Grade Unit
- cps
- Intercept
- 0.2 m
- From
- 22.33 m
- To
- 22.53 m
- Hole Depth
- 75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22.33 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DN26008:22.33-22.53
Location
- Location
- Don Main C Zone
- Azimuth
- 315 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow included intercept shows exceptionally high anomalous radioactivity, a very strong indicator for uranium mineralization, but final assays and true width are still needed.
Positive factors
- Exceptionally high anomalous radioactivity detected
- QP sign-off on technical information
Negative factors
- Assays pending (CPS is a proxy)
- True thickness not determined
- Narrow intercept
Evidence · table
“21907”
Context: incl
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
DN26009Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 4517Grade Unit: cpsIntercept: 2.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DN26009
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 4517
- Grade Unit
- cps
- Intercept
- 2.2 m
- From
- 25.83 m
- To
- 28.03 m
- Hole Depth
- 114 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.83 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DN26009:25.83-28.03
Location
- Location
- Don Main C Zone
- Azimuth
- 280 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows anomalous radioactivity, which is a positive indicator for uranium mineralization, but the lack of assays and true width limits immediate confidence.
Positive factors
- Anomalous radioactivity detected
- QP sign-off on technical information
Negative factors
- Assays pending (CPS is a proxy)
- True thickness not determined
Evidence · table
“4517”
Context: DN26009
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 17Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 10.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- A Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a very high historical uranium grade from drilling, indicating strong potential, but it is not a new result and requires verification.
Positive factors
- Very high historical uranium grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not verified by QP
- Narrow intercept
Evidence · text
“10.7% U3O8 over 0.3m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 18Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 2.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.67 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.67 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- A Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high historical uranium grade from drilling, indicating strong potential, but it is not a new result and requires verification.
Positive factors
- High historical uranium grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not verified by QP
Evidence · text
“2.14% U3O8 over 0.67m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 19Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 1.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.98 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.98 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a good historical uranium grade from trench sampling, indicating potential, but it is not a new result and requires verification.
Positive factors
- Good historical uranium grade from trenching
Negative factors
- Historical data, not verified by QP
Evidence · text
“1.17% U3O8 over 1.98m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
D-1Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- D-1
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 49.7 m
- To
- 50.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 49.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- D-1:49.7-50.3
Location
- Location
- Don Lake Zone A
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1950-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high historical uranium grade from very old drilling, indicating strong potential, but it is not a new result and has low confidence due to age and lack of verification.
Positive factors
- High historical uranium grade
Negative factors
- Very old historical data, not verified by QP
- Narrow intercept
Evidence · text
“hole D-1 returning 2.0% U3O8 over 0.6m from 49.7-50.3m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 21Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 8.57Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.91 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.57
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.91 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
Location
- Location
- A Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1969-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a very high historical uranium grade from trenching, indicating strong potential, but it is not a new result and requires verification.
Positive factors
- Very high historical uranium grade from trenching
Negative factors
- Historical data, not verified by QP
Evidence · text
“8.57% U3O8 over 0.91m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 22Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 2.86Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.61 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.86
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.61 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
Location
- Location
- A Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1969-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high historical uranium grade from trenching, indicating strong potential, but it is not a new result and requires verification.
Positive factors
- High historical uranium grade from trenching
Negative factors
- Historical data, not verified by QP
Evidence · text
“2.86% U3O8 over 0.61m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
23Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 10.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 23
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- Zone A
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1969-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a very high historical uranium grade from drilling, indicating strong potential, but it is not a new result and requires verification.
Positive factors
- Very high historical uranium grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not verified by QP
- Narrow intercept
Evidence · text
“hole 23 returned 10.7% U3O8 over 0.3m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 24Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 1.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.98 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.98 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
Location
- Location
- Zone B
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a good historical uranium grade from trench sampling, indicating potential, but it is not a new result and requires verification.
Positive factors
- Good historical uranium grade from trenching
Negative factors
- Historical data, not verified by QP
Evidence · text
“1.17% U3O8 over 1.98m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 25Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 0.71Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.34 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.71
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.34 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- Zone B
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical uranium grade from drilling, indicating potential, but it is not a new result and requires verification.
Positive factors
- Historical uranium grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not verified by QP
- Narrow intercept
Evidence · text
“0.71% U3O8 over 0.34m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 26Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.64
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- Zone B
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical uranium grade from drilling, indicating potential, but it is not a new result and requires verification.
Positive factors
- Historical uranium grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not verified by QP
- Narrow intercept
Evidence · text
“0.64% U3O8 over 0.3m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 27Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 3.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.61 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.61 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
Location
- Location
- Zone C
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high historical uranium grade from trench sampling, indicating strong potential, but it is not a new result and requires verification.
Positive factors
- High historical uranium grade from trenching
Negative factors
- Historical data, not verified by QP
Evidence · text
“3.02% U3O8 over 0.61m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 28Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- Zone C
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical uranium grade from drilling, indicating potential, but it is not a new result and requires verification.
Positive factors
- Historical uranium grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not verified by QP
- Narrow intercept
Evidence · text
“0.80% U3O8 over 0.3m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 29Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 0.85Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.52 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.85
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.52 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- Zone C
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical uranium grade from drilling, indicating potential, but it is not a new result and requires verification.
Positive factors
- Historical uranium grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not verified by QP
Evidence · text
“0.85% U3O8 over 0.52m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 30Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 1.63Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.63
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
Location
- Location
- Townsend Fault Uranium Showings
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a good historical uranium grade from channel sampling, indicating potential, but it is not a new result and requires verification.
Positive factors
- Good historical uranium grade from channel sampling
Negative factors
- Historical data, not verified by QP
- Narrow intercept
Evidence · text
“1.63% U3O8”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 31Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- A.R. Hawker Trench ARH-2
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a good historical uranium grade from grab samples, indicating potential, but it is not a new result and grab samples are not necessarily representative.
Positive factors
- Good historical uranium grade from grab samples
Negative factors
- Historical data, not verified by QP
- Grab samples are selective by nature
Evidence · text
“1.2% U3O8”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 32Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Lake
- Commodity
- uranium
- Region
- canada_sk
- Reported Region
- canada_sk
- Ticker
- EPL.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.78
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- A.R. Hawker Trench ARH-2
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical uranium grade from grab samples, indicating potential, but it is not a new result and grab samples are not necessarily representative.
Positive factors
- Historical uranium grade from grab samples
Negative factors
- Historical data, not verified by QP
- Grab samples are selective by nature
Evidence · text
“0.78% U3O8”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.