Economic study demonstrates scale, grade, long life, growth potential and robust financial returns

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
FireFly Metals Ltd
Ticker
FFM
Exchange
TSX
Region
Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
Primary commodity
Copper
Secondary commodities
Gold, Silver
Document categories
Resource update, Metallurgy, Capital raise
Extracted
2026-09-12 01:56:18 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

FireFly Metals has announced a Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) and an updated Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) for its Green Bay Ming Mine Copper-Gold Project in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. The PEA demonstrates robust economics for two production scenarios, with high NPVs and IRRs, supported by a significant increase in Measured and Indicated resources for the Ming Deposit. Metallurgical testwork indicates high recoveries for copper, gold, and silver with no deleterious elements, and the company has secured substantial funding through an equity raise and debt capacity.

Reasoning: The document presents a highly positive PEA and a significant resource update for the Ming Deposit, showing strong economics, high confidence resources, and favorable metallurgy. The capital raise further de-risks project funding. While the Little Deer MRE is historical, the overall picture is very strong for the Green Bay project.

Positive factors

  • Significant increase in Measured and Indicated (M&I) resources for the Ming Deposit, enhancing project confidence.
  • High overall M&I percentage (77% for Ming, 79-80% for LOM production) indicates robust geological confidence.
  • Strong PEA economics with high NPV and IRR for both production scenarios, demonstrating financial viability.
  • High copper and precious metal recoveries (over 98% Cu, over 80% Au/Ag) from metallurgical testwork, indicating favorable processing.
  • No deleterious elements reported in concentrate, suggesting clean concentrate and reduced penalty risks.
  • Substantial equity raise and debt capacity provide strong funding position for project development.
  • Project located in a tier-one mining jurisdiction with existing infrastructure, reducing development risk.

Negative factors

  • Little Deer MRE remains unchanged and is historical, indicating no new data for this deposit.
  • PEA is preliminary in nature and includes Inferred Mineral Resources, which are considered speculative geologically.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 30

Classification and evidence

Category Upgradepositive

Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.

Why it applies: The Ming Deposit M&I resources increased by 21% since the previous updates, indicating an upgrade in resource confidence.

Evidence · text

“Infill drilling completed at Ming resulted in the M&I increasing by 21% since the previous updates.”

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: The Ming Deposit M&I resources increased by 21% since the previous updates, representing significant tonnage growth.

Evidence · text

“Infill drilling completed at Ming resulted in the M&I increasing by 21% since the previous updates.”

Grade Improvementpositive

Average resource grade improved vs prior estimate — better deposit economics.

Why it applies: Copper equivalent grade increased by 22% driven primarily by infill drilling of the high-grade core and high-grade VMS zones.

Evidence · text

“Copper equivalent grade also increased by 22% driven primarily by infill drilling of the high-grade core and high-grade VMS zones.”

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: The increase in M&I tonnage and CuEq grade by 21% and 22% respectively implies a significant growth in contained metal.

Evidence · text

“Infill drilling completed at Ming resulted in the M&I increasing by 21% since the previous updates. Copper equivalent grade also increased by 22% driven primarily by infill drilling of the high-grade core and high-grade VMS zones.”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Multiple Qualified Persons (QPs) are listed with their responsibilities for the MRE and PEA, and Augustine Simbanegavi, P.Eng., reviewed and approved the technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Mr Augustine Simbanegavi, P.Eng., Vice President of Operations at FireFly Metals inc., and a Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101, has reviewed and approved the scientific and technical disclosure contained in this news release.”

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The Ming Deposit August 2026 MRE was prepared in accordance with the JORC Code (2012 Edition).

Evidence · text

“The Ming Deposit August 2026 MRE (Table 1) was prepared in accordance with the JORC Code (2012 Edition)”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The Ming Deposit August 2026 MRE was prepared in accordance with NI 43-101.

Evidence · text

“The Ming Deposit August 2026 MRE (Table 1) was prepared in accordance with the JORC Code (2012 Edition) and NI 43-101”

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: Mineral Resources have been reported at a 1.0% copper cut-off grade.

Evidence · text

“Mineral Resources have been reported at a 1.0% copper cut-off grade.”

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The Green Bay project includes 23.5Mt of Inferred Mineral Resources, which is a speculative category.

Evidence · text

“a further 23.5Mt @ 2.5% CuEq of Inferred Mineral Resources”

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: The Little Deer Mineral Resource Estimate is from November 2025 and remains unchanged from the previous MRE, indicating it is not new data.

Evidence · text

“Table 2: Little Deer Mineral Resource Estimate as at November 2025. Note that this MRE remains unchanged from the previous MRE.”

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: The resource estimate is prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA).

Evidence · text

“Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) 1 into the restart of production at the Green Bay Ming Mine Copper-Gold Project”

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The document announces an updated Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) for the Green Bay Ming Mine Copper-Gold Project.

Evidence · text

“an updated Mineral Resource Estimate ( MRE ) for the Green Bay Ming Mine Copper-Gold Project”

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: Recoveries are anticipated to be >98% for copper and >80% on precious metals (gold and silver), which are exceptional for the processing route.

Evidence · text

“recoveries are anticipated to be >98% for copper and >80% on precious metals (gold and silver).”

Free Millingpositive

Simple, clean ore amenable to standard processing without oxidation.

Why it applies: The ore-grade material has favourable physical properties and is amenable to high recoveries via industry standard processes, with no deleterious elements.

Evidence · text

“the ore-grade material has favourable physical properties (strength, grindability, abrasiveness etc.) and is amenable to high recoveries of copper and precious metals via industry standard processes”

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: The proposed processing plant utilises a standard simple flow sheet with a jaw crusher, SAG mill, Ball Mill, and two-stage flotation.

Evidence · text

“The proposed processing plant utilises a standard simple flow sheet to extract copper and precious metals into a concentrate. Comminution is achieved through a standard jaw crusher followed by a Semi Autogenous Grinding ( SAG ) mill and a Ball Mill. Two stage flotation (rougher and cleaner)”

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative · Story-specific tag

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that there are no deleterious elements in the concentrate.

Evidence · text

“There are no deleterious elements in the concentrate.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 30. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (24)

measuredMing Deposit · copperTonnes: 3500000Grade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 52Contained Unit: '000 tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ming Deposit
Commodity
copper
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-08-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Brian Thomas, Bernie Yen Jui Ting, Craig Norman Hall, Daniel Skruch, Patrick James McCann, Paul Palmer, Shawn George Russell, Sheldon Smith, Stephen Tarrant, Tommaso Roberto Raponi, Thomas Tremayne Parrott, Augustine Simbanegavi
Resource group id
resource:bff7437a236e7086352d
Deposit or zone
Ming Deposit

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
3500000
Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
52
Contained Unit
'000 t
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% copper

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-08-01

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.67
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Measured resource for copper at Ming Deposit is a high-confidence estimate with a good grade, contributing positively to the overall project.

Positive factors

  • High confidence Measured category resource.
  • Good copper grade for a VMS deposit.
  • Part of a significant M&I resource increase.

Evidence · table

“1.5”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

measuredMing Deposit · goldTonnes: 3500000Grade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 20Contained Unit: '000 ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ming Deposit
Commodity
gold
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-08-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Brian Thomas, Bernie Yen Jui Ting, Craig Norman Hall, Daniel Skruch, Patrick James McCann, Paul Palmer, Shawn George Russell, Sheldon Smith, Stephen Tarrant, Tommaso Roberto Raponi, Thomas Tremayne Parrott, Augustine Simbanegavi
Resource group id
resource:bff7437a236e7086352d
Deposit or zone
Ming Deposit

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
3500000
Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
20
Contained Unit
'000 oz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% copper

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-08-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Measured gold resource, while high confidence, has a relatively low grade, indicating it's a byproduct rather than a primary driver for this category.

Positive factors

  • High confidence Measured category resource.
  • Contributes to polymetallic nature of the deposit.

Negative factors

  • Gold grade is relatively low for a Measured resource.

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

measuredMing Deposit · silverTonnes: 3500000Grade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 147Contained Unit: '000 ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ming Deposit
Commodity
silver
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-08-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Brian Thomas, Bernie Yen Jui Ting, Craig Norman Hall, Daniel Skruch, Patrick James McCann, Paul Palmer, Shawn George Russell, Sheldon Smith, Stephen Tarrant, Tommaso Roberto Raponi, Thomas Tremayne Parrott, Augustine Simbanegavi
Resource group id
resource:bff7437a236e7086352d
Deposit or zone
Ming Deposit

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
3500000
Grade
1.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
147
Contained Unit
'000 oz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% copper

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-08-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Measured silver resource, while high confidence, has a relatively low grade, indicating it's a byproduct rather than a primary driver for this category.

Positive factors

  • High confidence Measured category resource.
  • Contributes to polymetallic nature of the deposit.

Negative factors

  • Silver grade is relatively low for a Measured resource.

Evidence · table

“1.3”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

indicatedMing Deposit · copperTonnes: 53800000Grade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1041Contained Unit: '000 tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ming Deposit
Commodity
copper
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-08-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Brian Thomas, Bernie Yen Jui Ting, Craig Norman Hall, Daniel Skruch, Patrick James McCann, Paul Palmer, Shawn George Russell, Sheldon Smith, Stephen Tarrant, Tommaso Roberto Raponi, Thomas Tremayne Parrott, Augustine Simbanegavi
Resource group id
resource:352dc93ecf49c6917016
Deposit or zone
Ming Deposit

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
53800000
Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
1041
Contained Unit
'000 t
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% copper

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-08-01

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.49
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated copper resource at Ming Deposit is substantial with a good grade, forming the bulk of the project's higher-confidence resource base and showing significant growth.

Positive factors

  • Large Indicated resource tonnage.
  • Good copper grade for a VMS deposit.
  • Significant increase in M&I resources for the Ming Deposit.

Evidence · table

“1.9”

Context: 53.8

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

indicatedMing Deposit · goldTonnes: 53800000Grade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 878Contained Unit: '000 ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ming Deposit
Commodity
gold
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-08-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Brian Thomas, Bernie Yen Jui Ting, Craig Norman Hall, Daniel Skruch, Patrick James McCann, Paul Palmer, Shawn George Russell, Sheldon Smith, Stephen Tarrant, Tommaso Roberto Raponi, Thomas Tremayne Parrott, Augustine Simbanegavi
Resource group id
resource:352dc93ecf49c6917016
Deposit or zone
Ming Deposit

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
53800000
Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
878
Contained Unit
'000 oz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% copper

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-08-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated gold resource, while not exceptionally high grade, contributes substantial contained metal, enhancing the polymetallic nature and value of the deposit.

Positive factors

  • Large contained gold metal in the Indicated category.
  • Contributes significantly to the overall project value.

Evidence · table

“0.5”

Context: 53.8

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

indicatedMing Deposit · silverTonnes: 53800000Grade: 4.5Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 7707Contained Unit: '000 ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ming Deposit
Commodity
silver
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-08-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Brian Thomas, Bernie Yen Jui Ting, Craig Norman Hall, Daniel Skruch, Patrick James McCann, Paul Palmer, Shawn George Russell, Sheldon Smith, Stephen Tarrant, Tommaso Roberto Raponi, Thomas Tremayne Parrott, Augustine Simbanegavi
Resource group id
resource:352dc93ecf49c6917016
Deposit or zone
Ming Deposit

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
53800000
Grade
4.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
7707
Contained Unit
'000 oz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% copper

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-08-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated silver resource, while not exceptionally high grade, contributes substantial contained metal, enhancing the polymetallic nature and value of the deposit.

Positive factors

  • Large contained silver metal in the Indicated category.
  • Contributes significantly to the overall project value.

Evidence · table

“4.5”

Context: 53.8

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredMing Deposit · copperTonnes: 17300000Grade: 2Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 344Contained Unit: '000 tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ming Deposit
Commodity
copper
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-08-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Brian Thomas, Bernie Yen Jui Ting, Craig Norman Hall, Daniel Skruch, Patrick James McCann, Paul Palmer, Shawn George Russell, Sheldon Smith, Stephen Tarrant, Tommaso Roberto Raponi, Thomas Tremayne Parrott, Augustine Simbanegavi
Resource group id
resource:44141f312659949c67bb
Deposit or zone
Ming Deposit

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
17300000
Grade
2
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
344
Contained Unit
'000 t
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% copper

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-08-01

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.77
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource at Ming Deposit shows good grade and adds to the project's potential, but its lower confidence category means it's more speculative.

Positive factors

  • Good copper grade for an Inferred resource.
  • Adds to the overall resource base and future potential.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“2.0”

Context: 17.3

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredMing Deposit · goldTonnes: 17300000Grade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 404Contained Unit: '000 ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ming Deposit
Commodity
gold
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-08-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Brian Thomas, Bernie Yen Jui Ting, Craig Norman Hall, Daniel Skruch, Patrick James McCann, Paul Palmer, Shawn George Russell, Sheldon Smith, Stephen Tarrant, Tommaso Roberto Raponi, Thomas Tremayne Parrott, Augustine Simbanegavi
Resource group id
resource:44141f312659949c67bb
Deposit or zone
Ming Deposit

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
17300000
Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
404
Contained Unit
'000 oz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% copper

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-08-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred gold resource adds to the project's overall metal content, but its lower confidence and moderate grade make it less material than the copper.

Positive factors

  • Contributes to the polymetallic nature and overall contained metal.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
  • Gold grade is moderate for an Inferred resource.

Evidence · table

“0.7”

Context: 17.3

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredMing Deposit · silverTonnes: 17300000Grade: 6.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3522Contained Unit: '000 ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ming Deposit
Commodity
silver
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-08-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Brian Thomas, Bernie Yen Jui Ting, Craig Norman Hall, Daniel Skruch, Patrick James McCann, Paul Palmer, Shawn George Russell, Sheldon Smith, Stephen Tarrant, Tommaso Roberto Raponi, Thomas Tremayne Parrott, Augustine Simbanegavi
Resource group id
resource:44141f312659949c67bb
Deposit or zone
Ming Deposit

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
17300000
Grade
6.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
3522
Contained Unit
'000 oz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% copper

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-08-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred silver resource adds to the project's overall metal content, but its lower confidence and moderate grade make it less material than the copper.

Positive factors

  • Contributes to the polymetallic nature and overall contained metal.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
  • Silver grade is moderate for an Inferred resource.

Evidence · table

“6.3”

Context: 17.3

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

indicatedLittle Deer · copperTonnes: 2900000Grade: 2.1Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 62Contained Unit: '000 tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Little Deer
Commodity
copper
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-11-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Brian Thomas, Bernie Yen Jui Ting, Craig Norman Hall, Daniel Skruch, Patrick James McCann, Paul Palmer, Shawn George Russell, Sheldon Smith, Stephen Tarrant, Tommaso Roberto Raponi, Thomas Tremayne Parrott, Augustine Simbanegavi
Resource group id
resource:add9a9bba84b5565e51a
Deposit or zone
Little Deer

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
2900000
Grade
2.1
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
62
Contained Unit
'000 t
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% copper

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-11-01

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.3
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical Indicated copper resource with a good grade, but it offers no new information as it remains unchanged from the previous estimate.

Positive factors

  • Good copper grade for an Indicated resource.

Negative factors

  • Resource remains unchanged from previous MRE, indicating no new data.

Evidence · table

“2.1”

Context: 2.9

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

indicatedLittle Deer · goldTonnes: 2900000Grade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 9Contained Unit: '000 ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Little Deer
Commodity
gold
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-11-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Brian Thomas, Bernie Yen Jui Ting, Craig Norman Hall, Daniel Skruch, Patrick James McCann, Paul Palmer, Shawn George Russell, Sheldon Smith, Stephen Tarrant, Tommaso Roberto Raponi, Thomas Tremayne Parrott, Augustine Simbanegavi
Resource group id
resource:add9a9bba84b5565e51a
Deposit or zone
Little Deer

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
2900000
Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
9
Contained Unit
'000 oz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% copper

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-11-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical Indicated gold resource with a very low grade, offering no new information as it remains unchanged from the previous estimate.

Negative factors

  • Resource remains unchanged from previous MRE, indicating no new data.
  • Gold grade is very low for an Indicated resource.

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: 2.9

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

indicatedLittle Deer · silverTonnes: 2900000Grade: 3.4Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 320Contained Unit: '000 ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Little Deer
Commodity
silver
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-11-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Brian Thomas, Bernie Yen Jui Ting, Craig Norman Hall, Daniel Skruch, Patrick James McCann, Paul Palmer, Shawn George Russell, Sheldon Smith, Stephen Tarrant, Tommaso Roberto Raponi, Thomas Tremayne Parrott, Augustine Simbanegavi
Resource group id
resource:add9a9bba84b5565e51a
Deposit or zone
Little Deer

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
2900000
Grade
3.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
320
Contained Unit
'000 oz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% copper

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-11-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical Indicated silver resource with a very low grade, offering no new information as it remains unchanged from the previous estimate.

Negative factors

  • Resource remains unchanged from previous MRE, indicating no new data.
  • Silver grade is very low for an Indicated resource.

Evidence · table

“3.4”

Context: 2.9

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredLittle Deer · copperTonnes: 6200000Grade: 1.8Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 110Contained Unit: '000 tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Little Deer
Commodity
copper
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-11-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Brian Thomas, Bernie Yen Jui Ting, Craig Norman Hall, Daniel Skruch, Patrick James McCann, Paul Palmer, Shawn George Russell, Sheldon Smith, Stephen Tarrant, Tommaso Roberto Raponi, Thomas Tremayne Parrott, Augustine Simbanegavi
Resource group id
resource:3bfcba36880df21c16a4
Deposit or zone
Little Deer

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
6200000
Grade
1.8
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
110
Contained Unit
'000 t
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% copper

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-11-01

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.8
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical Inferred copper resource with a good grade, but it offers no new information as it remains unchanged from the previous estimate.

Positive factors

  • Good copper grade for an Inferred resource.

Negative factors

  • Resource remains unchanged from previous MRE, indicating no new data.
  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“1.8”

Context: 6.2

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredLittle Deer · goldTonnes: 6200000Grade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 10Contained Unit: '000 ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Little Deer
Commodity
gold
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-11-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Brian Thomas, Bernie Yen Jui Ting, Craig Norman Hall, Daniel Skruch, Patrick James McCann, Paul Palmer, Shawn George Russell, Sheldon Smith, Stephen Tarrant, Tommaso Roberto Raponi, Thomas Tremayne Parrott, Augustine Simbanegavi
Resource group id
resource:3bfcba36880df21c16a4
Deposit or zone
Little Deer

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
6200000
Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
10
Contained Unit
'000 oz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% copper

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-11-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical Inferred gold resource with a very low grade, offering no new information as it remains unchanged from the previous estimate.

Negative factors

  • Resource remains unchanged from previous MRE, indicating no new data.
  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
  • Gold grade is very low for an Inferred resource.

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: 6.2

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredLittle Deer · silverTonnes: 6200000Grade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 430Contained Unit: '000 ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Little Deer
Commodity
silver
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-11-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Brian Thomas, Bernie Yen Jui Ting, Craig Norman Hall, Daniel Skruch, Patrick James McCann, Paul Palmer, Shawn George Russell, Sheldon Smith, Stephen Tarrant, Tommaso Roberto Raponi, Thomas Tremayne Parrott, Augustine Simbanegavi
Resource group id
resource:3bfcba36880df21c16a4
Deposit or zone
Little Deer

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
6200000
Grade
2.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
430
Contained Unit
'000 oz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% copper

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-11-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical Inferred silver resource with a very low grade, offering no new information as it remains unchanged from the previous estimate.

Negative factors

  • Resource remains unchanged from previous MRE, indicating no new data.
  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
  • Silver grade is very low for an Inferred resource.

Evidence · table

“2.2”

Context: 6.2

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

measuredGreen Bay · copperTonnes: 3500000Grade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 52Contained Unit: '000 tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay
Commodity
copper
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-08-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Brian Thomas, Bernie Yen Jui Ting, Craig Norman Hall, Daniel Skruch, Patrick James McCann, Paul Palmer, Shawn George Russell, Sheldon Smith, Stephen Tarrant, Tommaso Roberto Raponi, Thomas Tremayne Parrott, Augustine Simbanegavi
Resource group id
resource:b612be38358bef5e455c
Deposit or zone
Green Bay

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
3500000
Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
52
Contained Unit
'000 t
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% copper

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-08-01

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.67
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Measured resource for copper at Green Bay is a high-confidence estimate with a good grade, contributing positively to the overall project.

Positive factors

  • High confidence Measured category resource.
  • Good copper grade for a VMS deposit.
  • Part of a significant M&I resource increase.

Evidence · table

“1.5”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

measuredGreen Bay · goldTonnes: 3500000Grade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 20Contained Unit: '000 ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay
Commodity
gold
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-08-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Brian Thomas, Bernie Yen Jui Ting, Craig Norman Hall, Daniel Skruch, Patrick James McCann, Paul Palmer, Shawn George Russell, Sheldon Smith, Stephen Tarrant, Tommaso Roberto Raponi, Thomas Tremayne Parrott, Augustine Simbanegavi
Resource group id
resource:b612be38358bef5e455c
Deposit or zone
Green Bay

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
3500000
Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
20
Contained Unit
'000 oz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% copper

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-08-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Measured gold resource, while high confidence, has a relatively low grade, indicating it's a byproduct rather than a primary driver for this category.

Positive factors

  • High confidence Measured category resource.
  • Contributes to polymetallic nature of the deposit.

Negative factors

  • Gold grade is relatively low for a Measured resource.

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

measuredGreen Bay · silverTonnes: 3500000Grade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 147Contained Unit: '000 ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay
Commodity
silver
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-08-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Brian Thomas, Bernie Yen Jui Ting, Craig Norman Hall, Daniel Skruch, Patrick James McCann, Paul Palmer, Shawn George Russell, Sheldon Smith, Stephen Tarrant, Tommaso Roberto Raponi, Thomas Tremayne Parrott, Augustine Simbanegavi
Resource group id
resource:b612be38358bef5e455c
Deposit or zone
Green Bay

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
3500000
Grade
1.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
147
Contained Unit
'000 oz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% copper

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-08-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Measured silver resource, while high confidence, has a relatively low grade, indicating it's a byproduct rather than a primary driver for this category.

Positive factors

  • High confidence Measured category resource.
  • Contributes to polymetallic nature of the deposit.

Negative factors

  • Silver grade is relatively low for a Measured resource.

Evidence · table

“1.3”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

indicatedGreen Bay · copperTonnes: 56700000Grade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1103Contained Unit: '000 tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay
Commodity
copper
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-08-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Brian Thomas, Bernie Yen Jui Ting, Craig Norman Hall, Daniel Skruch, Patrick James McCann, Paul Palmer, Shawn George Russell, Sheldon Smith, Stephen Tarrant, Tommaso Roberto Raponi, Thomas Tremayne Parrott, Augustine Simbanegavi
Resource group id
resource:8f62f06a6247003fc9c1
Deposit or zone
Green Bay

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
56700000
Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
1103
Contained Unit
'000 t
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% copper

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-08-01

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.48
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated copper resource at Green Bay is substantial with a good grade, forming the bulk of the project's higher-confidence resource base and showing significant growth.

Positive factors

  • Large Indicated resource tonnage.
  • Good copper grade for a VMS deposit.
  • Significant increase in M&I resources for the Green Bay Project.

Evidence · table

“1.9”

Context: 56.7

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

indicatedGreen Bay · goldTonnes: 56700000Grade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 887Contained Unit: '000 ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay
Commodity
gold
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-08-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Brian Thomas, Bernie Yen Jui Ting, Craig Norman Hall, Daniel Skruch, Patrick James McCann, Paul Palmer, Shawn George Russell, Sheldon Smith, Stephen Tarrant, Tommaso Roberto Raponi, Thomas Tremayne Parrott, Augustine Simbanegavi
Resource group id
resource:8f62f06a6247003fc9c1
Deposit or zone
Green Bay

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
56700000
Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
887
Contained Unit
'000 oz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% copper

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-08-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated gold resource, while not exceptionally high grade, contributes substantial contained metal, enhancing the polymetallic nature and value of the deposit.

Positive factors

  • Large contained gold metal in the Indicated category.
  • Contributes significantly to the overall project value.

Evidence · table

“0.5”

Context: 56.7

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

indicatedGreen Bay · silverTonnes: 56700000Grade: 4.4Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 8027Contained Unit: '000 ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay
Commodity
silver
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-08-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Brian Thomas, Bernie Yen Jui Ting, Craig Norman Hall, Daniel Skruch, Patrick James McCann, Paul Palmer, Shawn George Russell, Sheldon Smith, Stephen Tarrant, Tommaso Roberto Raponi, Thomas Tremayne Parrott, Augustine Simbanegavi
Resource group id
resource:8f62f06a6247003fc9c1
Deposit or zone
Green Bay

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
56700000
Grade
4.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
8027
Contained Unit
'000 oz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% copper

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-08-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated silver resource, while not exceptionally high grade, contributes substantial contained metal, enhancing the polymetallic nature and value of the deposit.

Positive factors

  • Large contained silver metal in the Indicated category.
  • Contributes significantly to the overall project value.

Evidence · table

“4.4”

Context: 56.7

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredGreen Bay · copperTonnes: 23500000Grade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 454Contained Unit: '000 tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay
Commodity
copper
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-08-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Brian Thomas, Bernie Yen Jui Ting, Craig Norman Hall, Daniel Skruch, Patrick James McCann, Paul Palmer, Shawn George Russell, Sheldon Smith, Stephen Tarrant, Tommaso Roberto Raponi, Thomas Tremayne Parrott, Augustine Simbanegavi
Resource group id
resource:ce6b8b648792833b4080
Deposit or zone
Green Bay

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
23500000
Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
454
Contained Unit
'000 t
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% copper

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-08-01

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.51
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource at Green Bay shows good grade and adds to the project's potential, but its lower confidence category means it's more speculative.

Positive factors

  • Good copper grade for an Inferred resource.
  • Adds to the overall resource base and future potential.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“1.9”

Context: 23.5

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredGreen Bay · goldTonnes: 23500000Grade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 414Contained Unit: '000 ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay
Commodity
gold
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-08-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Brian Thomas, Bernie Yen Jui Ting, Craig Norman Hall, Daniel Skruch, Patrick James McCann, Paul Palmer, Shawn George Russell, Sheldon Smith, Stephen Tarrant, Tommaso Roberto Raponi, Thomas Tremayne Parrott, Augustine Simbanegavi
Resource group id
resource:ce6b8b648792833b4080
Deposit or zone
Green Bay

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
23500000
Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
414
Contained Unit
'000 oz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% copper

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-08-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred gold resource adds to the project's overall metal content, but its lower confidence and moderate grade make it less material than the copper.

Positive factors

  • Contributes to the polymetallic nature and overall contained metal.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
  • Gold grade is moderate for an Inferred resource.

Evidence · table

“0.6”

Context: 23.5

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredGreen Bay · silverTonnes: 23500000Grade: 5.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3952Contained Unit: '000 ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay
Commodity
silver
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-08-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Brian Thomas, Bernie Yen Jui Ting, Craig Norman Hall, Daniel Skruch, Patrick James McCann, Paul Palmer, Shawn George Russell, Sheldon Smith, Stephen Tarrant, Tommaso Roberto Raponi, Thomas Tremayne Parrott, Augustine Simbanegavi
Resource group id
resource:ce6b8b648792833b4080
Deposit or zone
Green Bay

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
23500000
Grade
5.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
3952
Contained Unit
'000 oz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% copper

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-08-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred silver resource adds to the project's overall metal content, but its lower confidence and moderate grade make it less material than the copper.

Positive factors

  • Contributes to the polymetallic nature and overall contained metal.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
  • Silver grade is moderate for an Inferred resource.

Evidence · table

“5.2”

Context: 23.5

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Metallurgical Results (6)

PEA projectionGreen Bay Ming Mine Copper-Gold Project · copperRecovery: 98.2 %Head Grade: 1.83Head Grade Unit: % CuView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Ming Mine Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
copper
Ticker
FFM

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
PEA projection
Processing Route
standard jaw crusher followed by a Semi Autogenous Grinding ( SAG ) mill and a Ball Mill. Two stage flotation (rougher and cleaner)

Recovery

Recovery
98.2 %
Recovery Basis
unspecified
Head Grade
1.83
Head Grade Unit
% Cu

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Lakefield
Consultant
Ausenco

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The projected copper recovery for the 1.8Mtpa scenario is exceptionally high, indicating very favorable metallurgical characteristics and contributing significantly to project economics.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper recovery projected for the 1.8Mtpa scenario.
  • High head grade supports strong recovery.
  • No deleterious elements reported in concentrate.

Evidence · table

“98.2”

Context: Copper Recovery

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 98.2% is at or above the exceptional band (92%)

PEA projectionGreen Bay Ming Mine Copper-Gold Project · goldRecovery: 81.3 %Head Grade: 0.62Head Grade Unit: g/t AuView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Ming Mine Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
FFM

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
PEA projection
Processing Route
standard jaw crusher followed by a Semi Autogenous Grinding ( SAG ) mill and a Ball Mill. Two stage flotation (rougher and cleaner)

Recovery

Recovery
81.3 %
Recovery Basis
unspecified
Head Grade
0.62
Head Grade Unit
g/t Au

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Lakefield
Consultant
Ausenco

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The projected gold recovery for the 1.8Mtpa scenario is strong, contributing positively to the overall project economics, especially given the polymetallic nature.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold recovery projected for the 1.8Mtpa scenario.
  • No deleterious elements reported in concentrate.

Evidence · table

“81.3”

Context: Gold Recovery

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

PEA projectionGreen Bay Ming Mine Copper-Gold Project · silverRecovery: 84.8 %Head Grade: 5.23Head Grade Unit: g/t AgView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Ming Mine Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Ticker
FFM

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
PEA projection
Processing Route
standard jaw crusher followed by a Semi Autogenous Grinding ( SAG ) mill and a Ball Mill. Two stage flotation (rougher and cleaner)

Recovery

Recovery
84.8 %
Recovery Basis
unspecified
Head Grade
5.23
Head Grade Unit
g/t Ag

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Lakefield
Consultant
Ausenco

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The projected silver recovery for the 1.8Mtpa scenario is strong, contributing positively to the overall project economics, especially given the polymetallic nature.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver recovery projected for the 1.8Mtpa scenario.
  • No deleterious elements reported in concentrate.

Evidence · table

“84.8”

Context: Silver Recovery

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

PEA projectionGreen Bay Ming Mine Copper-Gold Project · copperRecovery: 98.1 %Head Grade: 1.58Head Grade Unit: % CuView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Ming Mine Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
copper
Ticker
FFM

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
PEA projection
Processing Route
standard jaw crusher followed by a Semi Autogenous Grinding ( SAG ) mill and a Ball Mill. Two stage flotation (rougher and cleaner)

Recovery

Recovery
98.1 %
Recovery Basis
unspecified
Head Grade
1.58
Head Grade Unit
% Cu

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Lakefield
Consultant
Ausenco

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The projected copper recovery for the 4.6Mtpa scenario is exceptionally high, indicating very favorable metallurgical characteristics and contributing significantly to project economics.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper recovery projected for the 4.6Mtpa scenario.
  • High head grade supports strong recovery.
  • No deleterious elements reported in concentrate.

Evidence · table

“98.1”

Context: Copper Recovery

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 98.1% is at or above the exceptional band (92%)

PEA projectionGreen Bay Ming Mine Copper-Gold Project · goldRecovery: 80.1 %Head Grade: 0.48Head Grade Unit: g/t AuView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Ming Mine Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
FFM

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
PEA projection
Processing Route
standard jaw crusher followed by a Semi Autogenous Grinding ( SAG ) mill and a Ball Mill. Two stage flotation (rougher and cleaner)

Recovery

Recovery
80.1 %
Recovery Basis
unspecified
Head Grade
0.48
Head Grade Unit
g/t Au

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Lakefield
Consultant
Ausenco

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The projected gold recovery for the 4.6Mtpa scenario is strong, contributing positively to the overall project economics, especially given the polymetallic nature.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold recovery projected for the 4.6Mtpa scenario.
  • No deleterious elements reported in concentrate.

Evidence · table

“80.1”

Context: Gold Recovery

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

PEA projectionGreen Bay Ming Mine Copper-Gold Project · silverRecovery: 84.1 %Head Grade: 4.12Head Grade Unit: g/t AgView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Ming Mine Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Ticker
FFM

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
PEA projection
Processing Route
standard jaw crusher followed by a Semi Autogenous Grinding ( SAG ) mill and a Ball Mill. Two stage flotation (rougher and cleaner)

Recovery

Recovery
84.1 %
Recovery Basis
unspecified
Head Grade
4.12
Head Grade Unit
g/t Ag

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Lakefield
Consultant
Ausenco

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The projected silver recovery for the 4.6Mtpa scenario is strong, contributing positively to the overall project economics, especially given the polymetallic nature.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver recovery projected for the 4.6Mtpa scenario.
  • No deleterious elements reported in concentrate.

Evidence · table

“84.1”

Context: Silver Recovery

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.