# EdgarFiling Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/edgarfiling--d0c8cc6e-53f0-4836-9d71-7f5117c32ea6 Original source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1514597/000117184326004501/exh_991.htm Publisher: research Original announcement: Unknown date Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: 2026-11-09T15:38:32.284Z Atlas analysis updated: 2026-11-09T15:38:32.284Z - Company: Fury Gold Mines Limited - Ticker: FURY - Exchange: TSX - Region: Nunavut - Primary commodity: Gold - Secondary commodities: None reported - Document categories: Other, Drill results - Extracted: 2026-11-09 15:38:32 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.20 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Fury Gold Mines announced that its 2026 drilling program has started at the Committee Bay project in Nunavut, with work focused on resource growth at the Three Bluffs deposit and Antler prospect. The release emphasizes planned infill and step-out drilling, plus a prospecting/sampling program, rather than reporting new assays. It also restates prior intercepts at Antler and discusses historical mineralization at Three Bluffs as context for the upcoming work. Reasoning: This is mainly a future-work drilling announcement, so the current event is program commencement rather than new assay results. The disclosed historical intercepts support the targeting rationale but are not new results from this release. - Positive factor: 2026 drill program is underway at Committee Bay - Positive factor: focuses on resource growth at Three Bluffs and Antler - Positive factor: planned infill and step-out drilling targets known gold mineralization - Negative factor: no completed 2026 assays or intercepts are reported - Negative factor: the release is primarily a planned exploration-program announcement rather than results - Rubric flag: planned drilling is not completed results — Classify the release as other; only keep the quoted historical intercepts as drill facts because no new assays are reported. Facts used in scoring: 2 ## Classification and evidence **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: The disclosed value premise relies on proximity to another known deposit rather than the issuer's own results. Mere location or along-strike wording in a release that reports its own drilling does not establish this premise. Why it applies: The Antler target is presented as less than 2km away from the Three Bluffs deposit, and proximity is used to justify additional drilling. Evidence · text > less than 2km away from the Three Bluffs deposit **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Story-specific tag Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: A qualified person is named and said to have reviewed and approved the technical disclosures. Evidence · text > Valérie Doyon, P.Geo, Senior Project Geologist at Fury, is a “qualified person” ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Drill Results (2) ### 16AN044 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/edgarfiling--d0c8cc6e-53f0-4836-9d71-7f5117c32ea6#fact-drill-facts-0) Committee Bay · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 16AN044 - Project: Committee Bay - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_nu - Reported Region: canada\_nu #### Geometry - Grade: 3.19 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 9.9 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: orogenic - Program: exploration - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: underground #### Location - Location: Antler gold zone - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The document quotes a prior intersection from a release dated 2025-11-10 and uses it as context for future drilling at Antler. - Positive factor: grade is moderate to strong for an orogenic gold system - Positive factor: the interval is cited as one of the historical intersections motivating step-out drilling - Positive factor: it supports the case for additional drilling along strike and at depth - Negative factor: this is a historical result re-referenced in a program announcement - Negative factor: no true width is stated - Negative factor: no QA/QC disclosure accompanies the quoted historical intersection Evidence · text > hole 16AN044 \(9.9 m at 3.19 g/t Au\) #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Assays lack a certified lab, QA/QC methods and named relevant QP/CP responsibility in the full source. Named CP consent in scope counts; headings or old-release references alone do not. Correction approval does not verify unverified historical assays. Missing fields, partial text, plans or non-assay news prove no gap; never claim QA/QC was not performed. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Results are re-announced unchanged, without new assays or substantive reinterpretation. A material correction, withdrawal or new qualification of their location, ownership or reliability is new information, even without new assays. Historical context in a current announcement does not make it stale. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: The disclosed value premise relies on proximity to another known deposit rather than the issuer's own results. Mere location or along-strike wording in a release that reports its own drilling does not establish this premise. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Antler Prospect The Antler prospect is located within the Committee Bay gold belt, approximately 1.2km from the Three Bl" ### 11AN042 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/edgarfiling--d0c8cc6e-53f0-4836-9d71-7f5117c32ea6#fact-drill-facts-1) Committee Bay · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 11AN042 - Project: Committee Bay - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_nu - Reported Region: canada\_nu #### Geometry - Grade: 4 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 13 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: orogenic - Program: exploration - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: underground #### Location - Location: Antler gold zone - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The interval is explicitly cited as a previously drilled intersection from a prior release and is not a new assay result from this announcement. - Positive factor: moderate-grade gold interval - Positive factor: used to support the case for further step-out and infill drilling - Positive factor: historical intersection shows mineralization remains open along strike and at depth - Negative factor: historical result restated in the release - Negative factor: no true width is disclosed - Negative factor: no QA/QC information is provided for the quoted interval Evidence · text > hole 11AN042 \(13.0 m at 4.0 g/t Au\) #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Assays lack a certified lab, QA/QC methods and named relevant QP/CP responsibility in the full source. Named CP consent in scope counts; headings or old-release references alone do not. Correction approval does not verify unverified historical assays. Missing fields, partial text, plans or non-assay news prove no gap; never claim QA/QC was not performed. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Results are re-announced unchanged, without new assays or substantive reinterpretation. A material correction, withdrawal or new qualification of their location, ownership or reliability is new information, even without new assays. Historical context in a current announcement does not make it stale. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: The disclosed value premise relies on proximity to another known deposit rather than the issuer's own results. Mere location or along-strike wording in a release that reports its own drilling does not establish this premise. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Antler Prospect The Antler prospect is located within the Committee Bay gold belt, approximately 1.2km from the Three Bl" ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.