Engineer Gold Mines Drill Core Sampling Underway at TAG
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Engineer Gold Mines Ltd.
- Ticker
- EAU
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- northwestern British Columbia
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-17 18:35:19 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Engineer Gold Mines Ltd. has initiated an infill diamond drill core sampling program at its TAG Property in northwestern British Columbia. The program aims to sample previously unsampled sections of historical drill core from 2006-2008 to support a future resource estimate. The company has reviewed these historical results, which include several significant gold-silver intercepts, and a Qualified Person has deemed the historical data reliable for guiding future exploration, though not independently verified.
Reasoning: The company is undertaking an infill sampling program on historical drill core to advance towards a resource estimate, which is a positive step. However, the reported results are historical and not new assays, and the QP's review of historical data comes with a verification caveat, limiting novelty and confidence.
Positive factors
- Company is actively working on the project by sampling historical core
- Goal is to facilitate a future resource estimate
- Historical drill results show significant gold-silver intercepts
- Qualified Person has reviewed historical data and deemed it reliable for guidance
Negative factors
- Results presented are historical, not new drilling assays
- QP cannot verify historical information, only deem it reliable for guidance
- No new assay results are reported in this release
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 70
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 70. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (70)
TAG06-02TAG · goldGrade: 1.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG06-02
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.79
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20.7 m
- From
- 32.6 m
- To
- 53.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG06-02:32.6-53.3
Location
- Easting
- 541904
- Northing
- 6601586
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of moderate grade and width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“1.79”
Context: 20.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG06-02TAG · silverGrade: 9.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG06-02
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20.7 m
- From
- 32.6 m
- To
- 53.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG06-02:32.6-53.3
Location
- Easting
- 541904
- Northing
- 6601586
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of weak grade and moderate width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“9.13”
Context: 20.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG06-02TAG · goldGrade: 3.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG06-02
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.9 m
- From
- 42.2 m
- To
- 51.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG06-02:42.2-51.1
Location
- Easting
- 541904
- Northing
- 6601586
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of strong grade and moderate width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“3.16”
Context: 8.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG06-02TAG · silverGrade: 15.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG06-02
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.9 m
- From
- 42.2 m
- To
- 51.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG06-02:42.2-51.1
Location
- Easting
- 541904
- Northing
- 6601586
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of weak grade and moderate width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“15.60”
Context: 8.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG06-03TAG · goldGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.65 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG06-03
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20.65 m
- From
- 25.85 m
- To
- 46.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG06-03:25.85-46.5
Location
- Easting
- 541928
- Northing
- 6601643
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of moderate grade and width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“1.90”
Context: 20.65
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG06-03TAG · silverGrade: 9.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.65 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG06-03
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.76
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20.65 m
- From
- 25.85 m
- To
- 46.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG06-03:25.85-46.5
Location
- Easting
- 541928
- Northing
- 6601643
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of weak grade and moderate width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“9.76”
Context: 20.65
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG06-03TAG · goldGrade: 2.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.85 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG06-03
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.85 m
- From
- 29 m
- To
- 42.85 m
- Intercept Depth
- 29 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG06-03:29-42.85
Location
- Easting
- 541928
- Northing
- 6601643
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of strong grade and moderate width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“2.58”
Context: 13.85
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG06-03TAG · silverGrade: 13.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.85 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG06-03
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.85 m
- From
- 29 m
- To
- 42.85 m
- Intercept Depth
- 29 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG06-03:29-42.85
Location
- Easting
- 541928
- Northing
- 6601643
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of weak grade and moderate width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“13.37”
Context: 13.85
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG06-03TAG · goldGrade: 4.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG06-03
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.71
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
- From
- 31 m
- To
- 34.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 31 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG06-03:31-34.9
Location
- Easting
- 541928
- Northing
- 6601643
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of strong grade and narrow width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“4.71”
Context: 3.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG06-03TAG · silverGrade: 19.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG06-03
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.88
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
- From
- 31 m
- To
- 34.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 31 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG06-03:31-34.9
Location
- Easting
- 541928
- Northing
- 6601643
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of weak grade and narrow width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“19.88”
Context: 3.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG06-07TAG · goldGrade: 1.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39.55 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG06-07
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 39.55 m
- From
- 21.4 m
- To
- 60.95 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG06-07:21.4-60.95
Location
- Easting
- 542141
- Northing
- 6602277
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of moderate grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“1.03”
Context: 39.55
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG06-07TAG · silverGrade: 2.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39.55 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG06-07
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 39.55 m
- From
- 21.4 m
- To
- 60.95 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG06-07:21.4-60.95
Location
- Easting
- 542141
- Northing
- 6602277
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of very weak grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
- Silver grade is very weak
Evidence · table
“2.05”
Context: 39.55
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG06-17TAG · goldGrade: 1.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG06-17
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.59
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 23.1 m
- From
- 171.3 m
- To
- 194.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 171.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG06-17:171.3-194.4
Location
- Easting
- 541877
- Northing
- 6601707
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of moderate grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“1.59”
Context: 23.1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG06-17TAG · silverGrade: 9.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG06-17
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 23.1 m
- From
- 171.3 m
- To
- 194.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 171.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG06-17:171.3-194.4
Location
- Easting
- 541877
- Northing
- 6601707
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of weak grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“9.15”
Context: 23.1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG06-17TAG · goldGrade: 2.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG06-17
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.3 m
- From
- 188.1 m
- To
- 194.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 188.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG06-17:188.1-194.4
Location
- Easting
- 541877
- Northing
- 6601707
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of strong grade and moderate width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“2.49”
Context: 6.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG06-17TAG · silverGrade: 14.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG06-17
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.3 m
- From
- 188.1 m
- To
- 194.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 188.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG06-17:188.1-194.4
Location
- Easting
- 541877
- Northing
- 6601707
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of weak grade and moderate width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“14.20”
Context: 6.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG06-23TAG · goldGrade: 1.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG06-23
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 26.7 m
- From
- 127.3 m
- To
- 154 m
- Intercept Depth
- 127.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG06-23:127.3-154
Location
- Easting
- 541940
- Northing
- 6601883
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of moderate grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“1.72”
Context: 26.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG06-23TAG · silverGrade: 5.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG06-23
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 26.7 m
- From
- 127.3 m
- To
- 154 m
- Intercept Depth
- 127.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG06-23:127.3-154
Location
- Easting
- 541940
- Northing
- 6601883
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of very weak grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
- Silver grade is very weak
Evidence · table
“5.06”
Context: 26.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG06-23TAG · goldGrade: 3.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG06-23
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 127.3 m
- To
- 132 m
- Intercept Depth
- 127.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG06-23:127.3-132
Location
- Easting
- 541940
- Northing
- 6601883
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of strong grade and moderate width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“3.52”
Context: 4.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG06-23TAG · silverGrade: 4.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG06-23
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 127.3 m
- To
- 132 m
- Intercept Depth
- 127.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG06-23:127.3-132
Location
- Easting
- 541940
- Northing
- 6601883
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of very weak grade and moderate width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
- Silver grade is very weak
Evidence · table
“4.39”
Context: 4.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG07-29TAG · goldGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG07-29
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 35 m
- From
- 79.6 m
- To
- 114.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 79.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG07-29:79.6-114.6
Location
- Easting
- 542068
- Northing
- 6602095
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2007-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of moderate grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“1.33”
Context: 35.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG07-29TAG · silverGrade: 5.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG07-29
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 35 m
- From
- 79.6 m
- To
- 114.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 79.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG07-29:79.6-114.6
Location
- Easting
- 542068
- Northing
- 6602095
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2007-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of very weak grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
- Silver grade is very weak
Evidence · table
“5.87”
Context: 35.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG07-29TAG · goldGrade: 2.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG07-29
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.97
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 87.6 m
- To
- 91.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 87.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG07-29:87.6-91.6
Location
- Easting
- 542068
- Northing
- 6602095
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2007-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of strong grade and moderate width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“2.97”
Context: 4.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG07-29TAG · silverGrade: 9.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG07-29
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 87.6 m
- To
- 91.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 87.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG07-29:87.6-91.6
Location
- Easting
- 542068
- Northing
- 6602095
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2007-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of weak grade and moderate width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“9.85”
Context: 4.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG08-51TAG · goldGrade: 1.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG08-51
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 25.2 m
- From
- 86 m
- To
- 111.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 86 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG08-51:86-111.2
Location
- Easting
- 541805
- Northing
- 6601501
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of moderate grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“1.73”
Context: 25.2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG08-51TAG · silverGrade: 7.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG08-51
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 25.2 m
- From
- 86 m
- To
- 111.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 86 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG08-51:86-111.2
Location
- Easting
- 541805
- Northing
- 6601501
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of very weak grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
- Silver grade is very weak
Evidence · table
“7.20”
Context: 25.2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG08-51TAG · goldGrade: 2.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG08-51
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 87.9 m
- To
- 91.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 87.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG08-51:87.9-91.2
Location
- Easting
- 541805
- Northing
- 6601501
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of strong grade and narrow width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“2.91”
Context: 3.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG08-51TAG · silverGrade: 13.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG08-51
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 87.9 m
- To
- 91.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 87.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG08-51:87.9-91.2
Location
- Easting
- 541805
- Northing
- 6601501
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of weak grade and narrow width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“13.22”
Context: 3.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG08-59TAG · goldGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 42.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG08-59
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 42.1 m
- From
- 104.2 m
- To
- 146.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 104.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG08-59:104.2-146.3
Location
- Easting
- 541855
- Northing
- 6601580
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of moderate grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“1.50”
Context: 42.1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG08-59TAG · silverGrade: 8.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 42.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG08-59
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 42.1 m
- From
- 104.2 m
- To
- 146.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 104.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG08-59:104.2-146.3
Location
- Easting
- 541855
- Northing
- 6601580
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of very weak grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
- Silver grade is very weak
Evidence · table
“8.05”
Context: 42.1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG08-59TAG · goldGrade: 2.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG08-59
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.2 m
- From
- 110.8 m
- To
- 120 m
- Intercept Depth
- 110.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG08-59:110.8-120
Location
- Easting
- 541855
- Northing
- 6601580
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of strong grade and moderate width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“2.39”
Context: 9.2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG08-59TAG · silverGrade: 15.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG08-59
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.2 m
- From
- 110.8 m
- To
- 120 m
- Intercept Depth
- 110.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG08-59:110.8-120
Location
- Easting
- 541855
- Northing
- 6601580
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of weak grade and moderate width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“15.49”
Context: 9.2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG08-60TAG · goldGrade: 1.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG08-60
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.84
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 29.7 m
- From
- 70.4 m
- To
- 100.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG08-60:70.4-100.1
Location
- Easting
- 541875
- Northing
- 6601626
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of moderate grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“1.84”
Context: 29.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG08-60TAG · silverGrade: 5.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG08-60
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 29.7 m
- From
- 70.4 m
- To
- 100.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG08-60:70.4-100.1
Location
- Easting
- 541875
- Northing
- 6601626
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of very weak grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
- Silver grade is very weak
Evidence · table
“5.21”
Context: 29.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG08-60TAG · goldGrade: 2.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG08-60
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.97
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.7 m
- From
- 80.1 m
- To
- 95.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 80.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG08-60:80.1-95.8
Location
- Easting
- 541875
- Northing
- 6601626
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of strong grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“2.97”
Context: 15.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG08-60TAG · silverGrade: 8.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG08-60
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.7 m
- From
- 80.1 m
- To
- 95.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 80.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG08-60:80.1-95.8
Location
- Easting
- 541875
- Northing
- 6601626
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of very weak grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
- Silver grade is very weak
Evidence · table
“8.41”
Context: 15.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG08-60TAG · goldGrade: 5.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG08-60
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 85.3 m
- To
- 86.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 85.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG08-60:85.3-86.4
Location
- Easting
- 541875
- Northing
- 6601626
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of exceptional grade but very narrow width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“5.12”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG08-60TAG · silverGrade: 8.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG08-60
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 85.3 m
- To
- 86.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 85.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG08-60:85.3-86.4
Location
- Easting
- 541875
- Northing
- 6601626
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of very weak grade and very narrow width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
- Silver grade is very weak
Evidence · table
“8.6”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG08-61TAG · goldGrade: 1.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG08-61
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 25.9 m
- From
- 127.5 m
- To
- 153.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 127.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG08-61:127.5-153.4
Location
- Easting
- 541875
- Northing
- 6601626
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of moderate grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“1.58”
Context: 25.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG08-61TAG · silverGrade: 6.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG08-61
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 25.9 m
- From
- 127.5 m
- To
- 153.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 127.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG08-61:127.5-153.4
Location
- Easting
- 541875
- Northing
- 6601626
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of very weak grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
- Silver grade is very weak
Evidence · table
“6.30”
Context: 25.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG08-61TAG · goldGrade: 3.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG08-61
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- 138 m
- To
- 141.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 138 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG08-61:138-141.7
Location
- Easting
- 541875
- Northing
- 6601626
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of strong grade and narrow width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“3.29”
Context: 3.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
TAG08-61TAG · silverGrade: 14.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TAG08-61
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- 138 m
- To
- 141.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 138 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TAG08-61:138-141.7
Location
- Easting
- 541875
- Northing
- 6601626
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of weak grade and narrow width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · table
“14.07”
Context: 3.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
WR030211Wann River Prospect · goldGrade: 11.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WR030211
- Project
- Wann River Prospect
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2011-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of exceptional grade but very narrow width for an orogenic deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · text
“hole WR030211 which assayed 11.3 g/t Au and 76.2 g/t Ag over 1 m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
WR030211Wann River Prospect · silverGrade: 76.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WR030211
- Project
- Wann River Prospect
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 76.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2011-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of moderate grade and very narrow width for an orogenic deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · text
“hole WR030211 which assayed 11.3 g/t Au and 76.2 g/t Ag over 1 m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
WR040111Wann River Prospect · goldGrade: 11.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WR040111
- Project
- Wann River Prospect
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2011-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of exceptional grade but very narrow width for an orogenic deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · text
“hole WR040111 assaying 11.3 g/t Au and 94.8 g/t Ag over 1.0 m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
WR040111Wann River Prospect · silverGrade: 94.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WR040111
- Project
- Wann River Prospect
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 94.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2011-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of moderate grade and very narrow width for an orogenic deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
Evidence · text
“hole WR040111 assaying 11.3 g/t Au and 94.8 g/t Ag over 1.0 m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 47Wann River Prospect · goldGrade: 263Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Wann River Prospect
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 263
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical grab sample with exceptional gold grade, indicating high-grade potential, but grab samples are not representative and the result is historical.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
- Grab sample is not representative of overall mineralization
Evidence · text
“a quartz grab sample of 263 g/t gold and 1,350 g/t silver from the Lum showing”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 48Wann River Prospect · silverGrade: 1350Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Wann River Prospect
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 1350
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical grab sample with exceptional silver grade, indicating high-grade potential, but grab samples are not representative and the result is historical.
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not independently verified by QP
- Grab sample is not representative of overall mineralization
Evidence · text
“a quartz grab sample of 263 g/t gold and 1,350 g/t silver from the Lum showing”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
inclTAG · goldGrade: 3.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.9 m
- From
- 42.2 m
- To
- 51.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:42.2-51.1
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.16 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 28.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.16 g/t gold is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.16”
Context: incl
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
inclTAG · silverGrade: 15.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.9 m
- From
- 42.2 m
- To
- 51.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:42.2-51.1
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 138.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 15.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.60”
Context: incl
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
inclTAG · goldGrade: 2.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.85 m
- From
- 29 m
- To
- 42.85 m
- Intercept Depth
- 29 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:29-42.85
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.58 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 35.7 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.58 g/t gold is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.58”
Context: incl
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
inclTAG · silverGrade: 13.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.85 m
- From
- 29 m
- To
- 42.85 m
- Intercept Depth
- 29 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:29-42.85
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.37 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 185.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 13.37 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.37”
Context: incl
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
inclTAG · goldGrade: 4.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.71
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
- From
- 31 m
- To
- 34.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 31 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:31-34.9
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.71 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 18.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4.71 g/t gold is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.71”
Context: incl
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
inclTAG · silverGrade: 19.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.88
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
- From
- 31 m
- To
- 34.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 31 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:31-34.9
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.88 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 77.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 19.88 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“19.88”
Context: incl
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
inclTAG · goldGrade: 2.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.3 m
- From
- 188.1 m
- To
- 194.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 188.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:188.1-194.4
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.49 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 15.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.49 g/t gold is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.49”
Context: incl
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
inclTAG · silverGrade: 14.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.3 m
- From
- 188.1 m
- To
- 194.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 188.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:188.1-194.4
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 89.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 14.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“14.20”
Context: incl
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
inclTAG · goldGrade: 3.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 127.3 m
- To
- 132 m
- Intercept Depth
- 127.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:127.3-132
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.52 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 16.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.52 g/t gold is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.52”
Context: incl
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
inclTAG · silverGrade: 4.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 127.3 m
- To
- 132 m
- Intercept Depth
- 127.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:127.3-132
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.39 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 20.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.39 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.39”
Context: incl
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
inclTAG · goldGrade: 2.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.97
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 87.6 m
- To
- 91.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 87.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:87.6-91.6
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.97 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 11.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.97 g/t gold is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.97”
Context: incl
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
inclTAG · silverGrade: 9.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 87.6 m
- To
- 91.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 87.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:87.6-91.6
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.85 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 39.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9.85 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.85”
Context: incl
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
inclTAG · goldGrade: 2.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 87.9 m
- To
- 91.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 87.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:87.9-91.2
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.91 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 9.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.91 g/t gold is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.91”
Context: incl
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
inclTAG · silverGrade: 13.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 87.9 m
- To
- 91.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 87.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:87.9-91.2
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.22 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 43.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 13.22 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.22”
Context: incl
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
inclTAG · goldGrade: 2.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.2 m
- From
- 110.8 m
- To
- 120 m
- Intercept Depth
- 110.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:110.8-120
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.39 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 22.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.39 g/t gold is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.39”
Context: incl
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
inclTAG · silverGrade: 15.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.2 m
- From
- 110.8 m
- To
- 120 m
- Intercept Depth
- 110.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:110.8-120
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.49 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 142.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 15.49 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.49”
Context: incl
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
inclTAG · goldGrade: 2.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.97
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.7 m
- From
- 80.1 m
- To
- 95.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 80.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:80.1-95.8
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.97 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 46.6 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.97 g/t gold is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.97”
Context: incl
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
inclTAG · silverGrade: 8.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.7 m
- From
- 80.1 m
- To
- 95.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 80.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:80.1-95.8
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.41 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 132.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.41 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.41”
Context: incl
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
inclTAG · goldGrade: 5.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 85.3 m
- To
- 86.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 85.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:85.3-86.4
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.12 g/t gold is exceptional against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.12 g/t gold is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.12”
Context: incl
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
inclTAG · silverGrade: 8.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 85.3 m
- To
- 86.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 85.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:85.3-86.4
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.6”
Context: incl
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
inclTAG · goldGrade: 3.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- 138 m
- To
- 141.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 138 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:138-141.7
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.29 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 12.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.29 g/t gold is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.29”
Context: incl
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
inclTAG · silverGrade: 14.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- TAG
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- EAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- 138 m
- To
- 141.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 138 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:138-141.7
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.07 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 52.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 14.07 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“14.07”
Context: incl
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.