# Engineer Gold Mines Drill Core Sampling Underway at TAG Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/EAU/news/6636311532786332/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag Publisher: tmx Original announcement: 2026-08-25T11:30:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: Unknown date Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date - Company: Engineer Gold Mines Ltd. - Ticker: EAU - Exchange: TSX - Region: northwestern British Columbia - Primary commodity: Gold - Secondary commodities: Silver - Document categories: Drill results - Extracted: 2026-09-17 18:35:19 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.20 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Engineer Gold Mines Ltd. has initiated an infill diamond drill core sampling program at its TAG Property in northwestern British Columbia. The program aims to sample previously unsampled sections of historical drill core from 2006-2008 to support a future resource estimate. The company has reviewed these historical results, which include several significant gold-silver intercepts, and a Qualified Person has deemed the historical data reliable for guiding future exploration, though not independently verified. Reasoning: The company is undertaking an infill sampling program on historical drill core to advance towards a resource estimate, which is a positive step. However, the reported results are historical and not new assays, and the QP's review of historical data comes with a verification caveat, limiting novelty and confidence. - Positive factor: Company is actively working on the project by sampling historical core - Positive factor: Goal is to facilitate a future resource estimate - Positive factor: Historical drill results show significant gold-silver intercepts - Positive factor: Qualified Person has reviewed historical data and deemed it reliable for guidance - Negative factor: Results presented are historical, not new drilling assays - Negative factor: QP cannot verify historical information, only deem it reliable for guidance - Negative factor: No new assay results are reported in this release Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source. Facts used in scoring: 70 ## Classification and evidence No classification tags are available. ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 70. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Drill Results (70) ### TAG06-02 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-0) TAG · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG06-02 - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 1.79 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 20.7 m - From: 32.6 m - To: 53.3 m - Intercept Depth: 32.6 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG06-02:32.6-53.3 #### Location - Easting: 541904 - Northing: 6601586 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of moderate grade and width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 1.79 Context: 20.7 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG06-02 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-1) TAG · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG06-02 - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 9.13 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 20.7 m - From: 32.6 m - To: 53.3 m - Intercept Depth: 32.6 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG06-02:32.6-53.3 #### Location - Easting: 541904 - Northing: 6601586 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of weak grade and moderate width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 9.13 Context: 20.7 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG06-02 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-2) TAG · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG06-02 - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 3.16 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 8.9 m - From: 42.2 m - To: 51.1 m - Intercept Depth: 42.2 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG06-02:42.2-51.1 #### Location - Easting: 541904 - Northing: 6601586 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of strong grade and moderate width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 3.16 Context: 8.9 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG06-02 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-3) TAG · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG06-02 - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 15.6 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 8.9 m - From: 42.2 m - To: 51.1 m - Intercept Depth: 42.2 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG06-02:42.2-51.1 #### Location - Easting: 541904 - Northing: 6601586 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of weak grade and moderate width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 15.60 Context: 8.9 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG06-03 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-4) TAG · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG06-03 - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 1.9 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 20.65 m - From: 25.85 m - To: 46.5 m - Intercept Depth: 25.85 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG06-03:25.85-46.5 #### Location - Easting: 541928 - Northing: 6601643 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of moderate grade and width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 1.90 Context: 20.65 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG06-03 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-5) TAG · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG06-03 - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 9.76 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 20.65 m - From: 25.85 m - To: 46.5 m - Intercept Depth: 25.85 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG06-03:25.85-46.5 #### Location - Easting: 541928 - Northing: 6601643 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of weak grade and moderate width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 9.76 Context: 20.65 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG06-03 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-6) TAG · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG06-03 - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 2.58 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 13.85 m - From: 29 m - To: 42.85 m - Intercept Depth: 29 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG06-03:29-42.85 #### Location - Easting: 541928 - Northing: 6601643 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of strong grade and moderate width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 2.58 Context: 13.85 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG06-03 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-7) TAG · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG06-03 - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 13.37 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 13.85 m - From: 29 m - To: 42.85 m - Intercept Depth: 29 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG06-03:29-42.85 #### Location - Easting: 541928 - Northing: 6601643 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of weak grade and moderate width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 13.37 Context: 13.85 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG06-03 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-8) TAG · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG06-03 - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 4.71 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 3.9 m - From: 31 m - To: 34.9 m - Intercept Depth: 31 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG06-03:31-34.9 #### Location - Easting: 541928 - Northing: 6601643 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of strong grade and narrow width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 4.71 Context: 3.9 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG06-03 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-9) TAG · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG06-03 - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 19.88 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 3.9 m - From: 31 m - To: 34.9 m - Intercept Depth: 31 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG06-03:31-34.9 #### Location - Easting: 541928 - Northing: 6601643 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of weak grade and narrow width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 19.88 Context: 3.9 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG06-07 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-10) TAG · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG06-07 - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 1.03 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 39.55 m - From: 21.4 m - To: 60.95 m - Intercept Depth: 21.4 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG06-07:21.4-60.95 #### Location - Easting: 542141 - Northing: 6602277 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of moderate grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 1.03 Context: 39.55 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG06-07 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-11) TAG · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG06-07 - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 2.05 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 39.55 m - From: 21.4 m - To: 60.95 m - Intercept Depth: 21.4 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG06-07:21.4-60.95 #### Location - Easting: 542141 - Northing: 6602277 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of very weak grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP - Negative factor: Silver grade is very weak Evidence · table > 2.05 Context: 39.55 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG06-17 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-12) TAG · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG06-17 - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 1.59 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 23.1 m - From: 171.3 m - To: 194.4 m - Intercept Depth: 171.3 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG06-17:171.3-194.4 #### Location - Easting: 541877 - Northing: 6601707 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of moderate grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 1.59 Context: 23.1 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG06-17 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-13) TAG · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG06-17 - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 9.15 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 23.1 m - From: 171.3 m - To: 194.4 m - Intercept Depth: 171.3 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG06-17:171.3-194.4 #### Location - Easting: 541877 - Northing: 6601707 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of weak grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 9.15 Context: 23.1 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG06-17 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-14) TAG · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG06-17 - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 2.49 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 6.3 m - From: 188.1 m - To: 194.4 m - Intercept Depth: 188.1 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG06-17:188.1-194.4 #### Location - Easting: 541877 - Northing: 6601707 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of strong grade and moderate width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 2.49 Context: 6.3 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG06-17 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-15) TAG · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG06-17 - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 14.2 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 6.3 m - From: 188.1 m - To: 194.4 m - Intercept Depth: 188.1 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG06-17:188.1-194.4 #### Location - Easting: 541877 - Northing: 6601707 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of weak grade and moderate width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 14.20 Context: 6.3 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG06-23 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-16) TAG · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG06-23 - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 1.72 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 26.7 m - From: 127.3 m - To: 154 m - Intercept Depth: 127.3 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG06-23:127.3-154 #### Location - Easting: 541940 - Northing: 6601883 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of moderate grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 1.72 Context: 26.7 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG06-23 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-17) TAG · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG06-23 - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 5.06 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 26.7 m - From: 127.3 m - To: 154 m - Intercept Depth: 127.3 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG06-23:127.3-154 #### Location - Easting: 541940 - Northing: 6601883 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of very weak grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP - Negative factor: Silver grade is very weak Evidence · table > 5.06 Context: 26.7 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG06-23 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-18) TAG · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG06-23 - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 3.52 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 4.7 m - From: 127.3 m - To: 132 m - Intercept Depth: 127.3 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG06-23:127.3-132 #### Location - Easting: 541940 - Northing: 6601883 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of strong grade and moderate width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 3.52 Context: 4.7 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG06-23 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-19) TAG · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG06-23 - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 4.39 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 4.7 m - From: 127.3 m - To: 132 m - Intercept Depth: 127.3 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG06-23:127.3-132 #### Location - Easting: 541940 - Northing: 6601883 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of very weak grade and moderate width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP - Negative factor: Silver grade is very weak Evidence · table > 4.39 Context: 4.7 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG07-29 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-20) TAG · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG07-29 - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 1.33 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 35 m - From: 79.6 m - To: 114.6 m - Intercept Depth: 79.6 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG07-29:79.6-114.6 #### Location - Easting: 542068 - Northing: 6602095 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2007-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of moderate grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 1.33 Context: 35.0 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG07-29 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-21) TAG · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG07-29 - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 5.87 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 35 m - From: 79.6 m - To: 114.6 m - Intercept Depth: 79.6 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG07-29:79.6-114.6 #### Location - Easting: 542068 - Northing: 6602095 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2007-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of very weak grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP - Negative factor: Silver grade is very weak Evidence · table > 5.87 Context: 35.0 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG07-29 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-22) TAG · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG07-29 - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 2.97 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 4 m - From: 87.6 m - To: 91.6 m - Intercept Depth: 87.6 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG07-29:87.6-91.6 #### Location - Easting: 542068 - Northing: 6602095 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2007-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of strong grade and moderate width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 2.97 Context: 4.0 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG07-29 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-23) TAG · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG07-29 - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 9.85 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 4 m - From: 87.6 m - To: 91.6 m - Intercept Depth: 87.6 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG07-29:87.6-91.6 #### Location - Easting: 542068 - Northing: 6602095 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2007-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of weak grade and moderate width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 9.85 Context: 4.0 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG08-51 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-24) TAG · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG08-51 - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 1.73 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 25.2 m - From: 86 m - To: 111.2 m - Intercept Depth: 86 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG08-51:86-111.2 #### Location - Easting: 541805 - Northing: 6601501 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of moderate grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 1.73 Context: 25.2 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG08-51 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-25) TAG · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG08-51 - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 7.2 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 25.2 m - From: 86 m - To: 111.2 m - Intercept Depth: 86 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG08-51:86-111.2 #### Location - Easting: 541805 - Northing: 6601501 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of very weak grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP - Negative factor: Silver grade is very weak Evidence · table > 7.20 Context: 25.2 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG08-51 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-26) TAG · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG08-51 - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 2.91 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 3.3 m - From: 87.9 m - To: 91.2 m - Intercept Depth: 87.9 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG08-51:87.9-91.2 #### Location - Easting: 541805 - Northing: 6601501 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of strong grade and narrow width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 2.91 Context: 3.3 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG08-51 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-27) TAG · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG08-51 - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 13.22 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 3.3 m - From: 87.9 m - To: 91.2 m - Intercept Depth: 87.9 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG08-51:87.9-91.2 #### Location - Easting: 541805 - Northing: 6601501 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of weak grade and narrow width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 13.22 Context: 3.3 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG08-59 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-28) TAG · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG08-59 - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 1.5 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 42.1 m - From: 104.2 m - To: 146.3 m - Intercept Depth: 104.2 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG08-59:104.2-146.3 #### Location - Easting: 541855 - Northing: 6601580 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of moderate grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 1.50 Context: 42.1 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG08-59 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-29) TAG · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG08-59 - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 8.05 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 42.1 m - From: 104.2 m - To: 146.3 m - Intercept Depth: 104.2 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG08-59:104.2-146.3 #### Location - Easting: 541855 - Northing: 6601580 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of very weak grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP - Negative factor: Silver grade is very weak Evidence · table > 8.05 Context: 42.1 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG08-59 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-30) TAG · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG08-59 - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 2.39 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 9.2 m - From: 110.8 m - To: 120 m - Intercept Depth: 110.8 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG08-59:110.8-120 #### Location - Easting: 541855 - Northing: 6601580 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of strong grade and moderate width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 2.39 Context: 9.2 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG08-59 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-31) TAG · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG08-59 - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 15.49 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 9.2 m - From: 110.8 m - To: 120 m - Intercept Depth: 110.8 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG08-59:110.8-120 #### Location - Easting: 541855 - Northing: 6601580 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of weak grade and moderate width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 15.49 Context: 9.2 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG08-60 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-32) TAG · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG08-60 - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 1.84 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 29.7 m - From: 70.4 m - To: 100.1 m - Intercept Depth: 70.4 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG08-60:70.4-100.1 #### Location - Easting: 541875 - Northing: 6601626 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of moderate grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 1.84 Context: 29.7 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG08-60 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-33) TAG · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG08-60 - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 5.21 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 29.7 m - From: 70.4 m - To: 100.1 m - Intercept Depth: 70.4 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG08-60:70.4-100.1 #### Location - Easting: 541875 - Northing: 6601626 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of very weak grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP - Negative factor: Silver grade is very weak Evidence · table > 5.21 Context: 29.7 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG08-60 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-34) TAG · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG08-60 - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 2.97 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 15.7 m - From: 80.1 m - To: 95.8 m - Intercept Depth: 80.1 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG08-60:80.1-95.8 #### Location - Easting: 541875 - Northing: 6601626 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of strong grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 2.97 Context: 15.7 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG08-60 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-35) TAG · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG08-60 - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 8.41 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 15.7 m - From: 80.1 m - To: 95.8 m - Intercept Depth: 80.1 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG08-60:80.1-95.8 #### Location - Easting: 541875 - Northing: 6601626 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of very weak grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP - Negative factor: Silver grade is very weak Evidence · table > 8.41 Context: 15.7 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG08-60 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-36) TAG · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG08-60 - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 5.12 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 1.1 m - From: 85.3 m - To: 86.4 m - Intercept Depth: 85.3 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG08-60:85.3-86.4 #### Location - Easting: 541875 - Northing: 6601626 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of exceptional grade but very narrow width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 5.12 Context: 1.1 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG08-60 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-37) TAG · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG08-60 - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 8.6 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 1.1 m - From: 85.3 m - To: 86.4 m - Intercept Depth: 85.3 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG08-60:85.3-86.4 #### Location - Easting: 541875 - Northing: 6601626 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of very weak grade and very narrow width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP - Negative factor: Silver grade is very weak Evidence · table > 8.6 Context: 1.1 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG08-61 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-38) TAG · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG08-61 - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 1.58 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 25.9 m - From: 127.5 m - To: 153.4 m - Intercept Depth: 127.5 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG08-61:127.5-153.4 #### Location - Easting: 541875 - Northing: 6601626 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of moderate grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 1.58 Context: 25.9 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG08-61 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-39) TAG · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG08-61 - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 6.3 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 25.9 m - From: 127.5 m - To: 153.4 m - Intercept Depth: 127.5 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG08-61:127.5-153.4 #### Location - Easting: 541875 - Northing: 6601626 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of very weak grade and strong width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP - Negative factor: Silver grade is very weak Evidence · table > 6.30 Context: 25.9 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG08-61 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-40) TAG · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG08-61 - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 3.29 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 3.7 m - From: 138 m - To: 141.7 m - Intercept Depth: 138 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG08-61:138-141.7 #### Location - Easting: 541875 - Northing: 6601626 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of strong grade and narrow width for an epithermal deposit, but its novelty is low as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 3.29 Context: 3.7 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### TAG08-61 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-41) TAG · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TAG08-61 - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 14.07 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 3.7 m - From: 138 m - To: 141.7 m - Intercept Depth: 138 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: mixed - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: TAG08-61:138-141.7 #### Location - Easting: 541875 - Northing: 6601626 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of weak grade and narrow width for an epithermal deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · table > 14.07 Context: 3.7 #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "mixed" ### WR030211 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-42) Wann River Prospect · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: WR030211 - Project: Wann River Prospect - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 11.3 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 1 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: orogenic - Program: exploration - Sample Type: drill #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2011-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of exceptional grade but very narrow width for an orogenic deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · text > hole WR030211 which assayed 11.3 g/t Au and 76.2 g/t Ag over 1 m #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### WR030211 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-43) Wann River Prospect · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: WR030211 - Project: Wann River Prospect - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 76.2 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 1 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: orogenic - Program: exploration - Sample Type: drill #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2011-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of moderate grade and very narrow width for an orogenic deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · text > hole WR030211 which assayed 11.3 g/t Au and 76.2 g/t Ag over 1 m #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### WR040111 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-44) Wann River Prospect · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: WR040111 - Project: Wann River Prospect - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 11.3 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 1 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: orogenic - Program: exploration - Sample Type: drill #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2011-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of exceptional grade but very narrow width for an orogenic deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · text > hole WR040111 assaying 11.3 g/t Au and 94.8 g/t Ag over 1.0 m #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### WR040111 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-45) Wann River Prospect · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: WR040111 - Project: Wann River Prospect - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 94.8 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 1 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: orogenic - Program: exploration - Sample Type: drill #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2011-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of moderate grade and very narrow width for an orogenic deposit, with low novelty as it's a re-reported historical result. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP Evidence · text > hole WR040111 assaying 11.3 g/t Au and 94.8 g/t Ag over 1.0 m #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 47 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-46) Wann River Prospect · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Wann River Prospect - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 263 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: orogenic - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical grab sample with exceptional gold grade, indicating high-grade potential, but grab samples are not representative and the result is historical. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP - Negative factor: Grab sample is not representative of overall mineralization Evidence · text > a quartz grab sample of 263 g/t gold and 1,350 g/t silver from the Lum showing #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 48 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-47) Wann River Prospect · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Wann River Prospect - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 1350 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Deposit Type: orogenic - Program: exploration - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical grab sample with exceptional silver grade, indicating high-grade potential, but grab samples are not representative and the result is historical. - Negative factor: Result is historical and not independently verified by QP - Negative factor: Grab sample is not representative of overall mineralization Evidence · text > a quartz grab sample of 263 g/t gold and 1,350 g/t silver from the Lum showing #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### incl [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-48) TAG · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: incl - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 3.16 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 8.9 m - From: 42.2 m - To: 51.1 m - Intercept Depth: 42.2 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: incl:42.2-51.1 #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.16 g/t gold is strong against the default band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 28.1 g/t·m is weak \(grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used\). - Positive factor: 3.16 g/t gold is strong on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 3.16 Context: incl #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### incl [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-49) TAG · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: incl - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 15.6 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 8.9 m - From: 42.2 m - To: 51.1 m - Intercept Depth: 42.2 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: incl:42.2-51.1 #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.6 g/t silver is below against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 138.8 g/t·m is below. - Negative factor: 15.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold \(30 g/t\) on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 15.60 Context: incl #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### incl [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-50) TAG · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: incl - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 2.58 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 13.85 m - From: 29 m - To: 42.85 m - Intercept Depth: 29 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: incl:29-42.85 #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.58 g/t gold is strong against the default band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 35.7 g/t·m is moderate \(grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used\). - Positive factor: 2.58 g/t gold is strong on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 2.58 Context: incl #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### incl [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-51) TAG · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: incl - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 13.37 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 13.85 m - From: 29 m - To: 42.85 m - Intercept Depth: 29 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: incl:29-42.85 #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.37 g/t silver is below against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 185.2 g/t·m is below. - Negative factor: 13.37 g/t silver is below the weak threshold \(30 g/t\) on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 13.37 Context: incl #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### incl [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-52) TAG · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: incl - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 4.71 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 3.9 m - From: 31 m - To: 34.9 m - Intercept Depth: 31 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: incl:31-34.9 #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.71 g/t gold is strong against the default band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 18.4 g/t·m is weak \(grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used\). - Positive factor: 4.71 g/t gold is strong on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 4.71 Context: incl #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### incl [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-53) TAG · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: incl - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 19.88 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 3.9 m - From: 31 m - To: 34.9 m - Intercept Depth: 31 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: incl:31-34.9 #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.88 g/t silver is below against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 77.5 g/t·m is below. - Negative factor: 19.88 g/t silver is below the weak threshold \(30 g/t\) on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 19.88 Context: incl #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### incl [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-54) TAG · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: incl - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 2.49 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 6.3 m - From: 188.1 m - To: 194.4 m - Intercept Depth: 188.1 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: incl:188.1-194.4 #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.49 g/t gold is strong against the default band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 15.7 g/t·m is weak \(grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used\). - Positive factor: 2.49 g/t gold is strong on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 2.49 Context: incl #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### incl [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-55) TAG · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: incl - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 14.2 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 6.3 m - From: 188.1 m - To: 194.4 m - Intercept Depth: 188.1 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: incl:188.1-194.4 #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.2 g/t silver is below against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 89.5 g/t·m is below. - Negative factor: 14.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold \(30 g/t\) on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 14.20 Context: incl #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### incl [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-56) TAG · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: incl - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 3.52 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 4.7 m - From: 127.3 m - To: 132 m - Intercept Depth: 127.3 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: incl:127.3-132 #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.52 g/t gold is strong against the default band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 16.5 g/t·m is weak \(grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used\). - Positive factor: 3.52 g/t gold is strong on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 3.52 Context: incl #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### incl [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-57) TAG · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: incl - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 4.39 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 4.7 m - From: 127.3 m - To: 132 m - Intercept Depth: 127.3 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: incl:127.3-132 #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.39 g/t silver is below against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 20.6 g/t·m is below. - Negative factor: 4.39 g/t silver is below the weak threshold \(30 g/t\) on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 4.39 Context: incl #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### incl [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-58) TAG · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: incl - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 2.97 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 4 m - From: 87.6 m - To: 91.6 m - Intercept Depth: 87.6 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: incl:87.6-91.6 #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.97 g/t gold is strong against the default band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 11.9 g/t·m is weak \(grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used\). - Positive factor: 2.97 g/t gold is strong on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 2.97 Context: incl #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### incl [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-59) TAG · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: incl - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 9.85 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 4 m - From: 87.6 m - To: 91.6 m - Intercept Depth: 87.6 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: incl:87.6-91.6 #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.85 g/t silver is below against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 39.4 g/t·m is below. - Negative factor: 9.85 g/t silver is below the weak threshold \(30 g/t\) on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 9.85 Context: incl #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### incl [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-60) TAG · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: incl - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 2.91 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 3.3 m - From: 87.9 m - To: 91.2 m - Intercept Depth: 87.9 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: incl:87.9-91.2 #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.91 g/t gold is strong against the default band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 9.6 g/t·m is below \(grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used\). - Positive factor: 2.91 g/t gold is strong on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 2.91 Context: incl #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### incl [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-61) TAG · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: incl - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 13.22 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 3.3 m - From: 87.9 m - To: 91.2 m - Intercept Depth: 87.9 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: incl:87.9-91.2 #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.22 g/t silver is below against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 43.6 g/t·m is below. - Negative factor: 13.22 g/t silver is below the weak threshold \(30 g/t\) on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 13.22 Context: incl #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### incl [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-62) TAG · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: incl - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 2.39 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 9.2 m - From: 110.8 m - To: 120 m - Intercept Depth: 110.8 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: incl:110.8-120 #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.39 g/t gold is strong against the default band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 22.0 g/t·m is weak \(grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used\). - Positive factor: 2.39 g/t gold is strong on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 2.39 Context: incl #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### incl [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-63) TAG · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: incl - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 15.49 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 9.2 m - From: 110.8 m - To: 120 m - Intercept Depth: 110.8 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: incl:110.8-120 #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.49 g/t silver is below against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 142.5 g/t·m is below. - Negative factor: 15.49 g/t silver is below the weak threshold \(30 g/t\) on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 15.49 Context: incl #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### incl [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-64) TAG · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: incl - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 2.97 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 15.7 m - From: 80.1 m - To: 95.8 m - Intercept Depth: 80.1 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: incl:80.1-95.8 #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.97 g/t gold is strong against the default band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 46.6 g/t·m is moderate \(grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used\). - Positive factor: 2.97 g/t gold is strong on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 2.97 Context: incl #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### incl [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-65) TAG · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: incl - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 8.41 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 15.7 m - From: 80.1 m - To: 95.8 m - Intercept Depth: 80.1 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: incl:80.1-95.8 #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.41 g/t silver is below against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 132.0 g/t·m is below. - Negative factor: 8.41 g/t silver is below the weak threshold \(30 g/t\) on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 8.41 Context: incl #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### incl [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-66) TAG · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: incl - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 5.12 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 1.1 m - From: 85.3 m - To: 86.4 m - Intercept Depth: 85.3 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: incl:85.3-86.4 #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.12 g/t gold is exceptional against the default band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 5.6 g/t·m is below \(grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used\). - Positive factor: 5.12 g/t gold is exceptional on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 5.12 Context: incl #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### incl [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-67) TAG · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: incl - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 8.6 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 1.1 m - From: 85.3 m - To: 86.4 m - Intercept Depth: 85.3 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: incl:85.3-86.4 #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.6 g/t silver is below against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 9.5 g/t·m is below. - Negative factor: 8.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold \(30 g/t\) on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 8.6 Context: incl #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### incl [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-68) TAG · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: incl - Project: TAG - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 3.29 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 3.7 m - From: 138 m - To: 141.7 m - Intercept Depth: 138 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: incl:138-141.7 #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.29 g/t gold is strong against the default band \[5, 2, 1, 0.3\] g/t. Grade×width 12.2 g/t·m is weak \(grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used\). - Positive factor: 3.29 g/t gold is strong on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 3.29 Context: incl #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### incl [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/engineer-gold-mines-drill-core-sampling-underway-at-tag--bc1d1791-d906-43d9-83f7-d2e155e3ca1c#fact-drill-facts-69) TAG · silver #### Identity - Hole ID: incl - Project: TAG - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: EAU #### Geometry - Grade: 14.07 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 3.7 m - From: 138 m - To: 141.7 m - Intercept Depth: 138 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: incl:138-141.7 #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.07 g/t silver is below against the default band \[500, 200, 100, 30\] g/t. Grade×width 52.1 g/t·m is below. - Negative factor: 14.07 g/t silver is below the weak threshold \(30 g/t\) on the default band. - Negative factor: Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context. Evidence · table > 14.07 Context: incl #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.