Equity Metals Reports 431g/t AgEq over 7.6 Metres and 710g/t AgEq over 3.3 Metres from Fall Drill Program on the Silver Queen Property, BC

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Equity Metals Corporation
Ticker
EQTY
Exchange
TSX
Region
British Columbia
Primary commodity
Silver
Secondary commodities
Gold, Copper, Lead, Zinc
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-13 23:09:23 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Equity Metals reported high-grade silver equivalent drill results from its Fall 2024 program at the Silver Queen Property, British Columbia. Key intercepts include 431 g/t AgEq over 7.6 metres and 710 g/t AgEq over 3.3 metres, extending the No. 3 Vein mineralization beyond the current resource model. These results confirm strong continuity and identify higher-grade zones both at depth and laterally, with further assays pending.

Reasoning: The drill program successfully extended high-grade gold-silver-base metal mineralization at the No. 3 Vein, confirming continuity and identifying new zones beyond the current resource model, which is a significant positive for future resource updates.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver equivalent intercepts
  • Extension of mineralization along strike and at depth beyond current resource model
  • Strong continuity of mineralization confirmed
  • Identification of higher-grade zones
  • Potential for reduced development costs due to proximity to historic underground workings
  • Comprehensive QA/QC disclosure with stated lab, standards, blanks, and duplicates
  • Transparent metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Negative factors

  • Some reported intervals include significant internal dilution (up to 50.7%)

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 152

Classification and evidence

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: Multiple intercepts exceed the bonanza grade threshold for silver equivalent, including 1475 g/t AgEq over 1.6m, 1341 g/t AgEq over 1.1m, and 1841 g/t AgEq over 0.3m.

Evidence · text

“1,475g/t AgEq or 19.8g/t AuEq) from SQ24-136; A 3.3 metre (Est. TT) interval grading 2.8g/t Au, 66g/t Ag , 1.4% Pb and 6.9% Zn (710g/t AgEq or 9.6g/t AuEq) including a 1.1 metre (est. TT) interval averaging 4.7g/t Au, 115g/t Ag, 2.7% Pb and 13.8% Zn (1,341g/t AgEq or 18.0g/t AuEq) from SQ24-130; and A 2.4 metre (Est. TT) interval grading 0.5g/t Au, 376g/t Ag , 0.4% Cu and 0.1% Zn (473g/t AgEq or 6.4g/t AuEq) from SQ24-131. These latest assay results have successfully confirmed both the grade and tenor of mineralization beyond the northern end of the No. 3 Vein resource model. Drilling has identified higher grade gold- and silver-enriched intercepts both 100 metres below the modelled resource and a further 100 metres laterally to the northwest (see Figure 2). Intercepts of the No. 3 Vein demonstrate strong continuity in this latest drilling and several high-grade copper-enriched hangingwall intercepts also show promise and include 8.6g/t Au , 790g/t Ag and 3.2% Cu (1,841g/t AgEq or 24.8g/t AuEq) over 0.3m (ETT) from SQ24-136 .”

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: The document consistently reports 'ETT (m)' which stands for Estimated True Thickness, providing true width estimates for all intercepts.

Evidence · table

“ETT (m)”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drilling successfully confirmed mineralization 'beyond the northern end of the No. 3 Vein resource model' and identified intercepts '100 metres below the modelled resource and a further 100 metres laterally to the northwest'.

Evidence · text

“These latest assay results have successfully confirmed both the grade and tenor of mineralization beyond the northern end of the No. 3 Vein resource model. Drilling has identified higher grade gold- and silver-enriched intercepts both 100 metres below the modelled resource and a further 100 metres laterally to the northwest (see Figure 2).”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release details that samples were analyzed by MS Analytical, and accuracy is tested through systematic inclusion of QA/QC standards, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Notes: drill core samples were analyzed by FA/AAS for gold and 48 element ICP-MS by MS Analytical, Langley, BC. ... Accuracy of results is tested through the systematic inclusion of QA/QC standards, blanks and duplicates into the sample stream.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: The document states that 'Downhole composites calculated using a 80g/t AgEq (1g/t AuEq) cut-off and <20% internal dilution'.

Evidence · text

“Downhole composites calculated using a 80g/t AgEq (1g/t AuEq) cut-off and <20% internal dilution, except where noted.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 152. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (152)

SQ24-129Silver Queen · silverGrade: 270Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-129
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
270
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.2 m
True Width
1.8 m
From
152.7 m
To
154.9 m
Intercept Depth
152.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-129:152.7-154.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate silver equivalent grades with disclosed true width, contributing to the overall understanding of the vein system despite high dilution.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade
  • True width disclosed

Negative factors

  • High reported dilution (50%)

Evidence · table

“270”

Context: 2.2

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.8

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-129Silver Queen · silverGrade: 773Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-129
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
773
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
True Width
0.5 m
From
154.3 m
To
154.9 m
Intercept Depth
154.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-129:154.3-154.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval within SQ24-129 demonstrates localized high-grade mineralization, enhancing the overall prospectivity of the zone.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver equivalent sub-interval
  • True width disclosed

Evidence · table

“773”

Context: 0.6

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.5

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-130Silver Queen · silverGrade: 368Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-130
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
368
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.7 m
True Width
1.3 m
From
197.7 m
To
199.4 m
Intercept Depth
197.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-130:197.7-199.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept from a hangingwall splay shows moderate silver equivalent grades, contributing to the understanding of the vein system's complexity.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade
  • True width disclosed

Negative factors

  • Moderate reported dilution (32.3%)

Evidence · table

“368”

Context: 1.7

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.3

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-130Silver Queen · silverGrade: 710Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-130
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
710
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.2 m
True Width
3.3 m
From
209.2 m
To
213.5 m
Intercept Depth
209.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-130:209.2-213.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade, significant width intercept from the No. 3 Main Vein is a key highlight, confirming strong mineralization and continuity in the target area.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver equivalent intercept
  • Significant true width
  • Confirms continuity of No. 3 Main Vein

Evidence · table

“710”

Context: 4.2

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.3

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-130Silver Queen · silverGrade: 1013Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-130
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
1013
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m
True Width
1.9 m
From
211.1 m
To
213.5 m
Intercept Depth
211.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-130:211.1-213.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very high-grade sub-interval within SQ24-130 represents bonanza-grade mineralization, significantly enhancing the overall value of the intercept.

Positive factors

  • Very high-grade silver equivalent sub-interval
  • Significant true width
  • Bonanza grade

Evidence · table

“1013”

Context: 2.4

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.9

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-130Silver Queen · silverGrade: 1341Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-130
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
1341
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
True Width
1.1 m
From
211.4 m
To
212.8 m
Intercept Depth
211.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-130:211.4-212.8
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
18
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This exceptional bonanza-grade sub-interval is a standout result, indicating extremely high-grade mineralization within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional bonanza-grade silver equivalent sub-interval
  • Significant true width

Evidence · table

“1341”

Context: 1.4

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.1

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-130Silver Queen · silverGrade: 201Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-130
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
201
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.6 m
True Width
1.2 m
From
334.7 m
To
336.3 m
Intercept Depth
334.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-130:334.7-336.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept from the No. 2 Vein shows moderate silver equivalent grades, indicating mineralization in a secondary vein structure.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade
  • True width disclosed

Evidence · table

“201”

Context: 1.6

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.2

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-130Silver Queen · silverGrade: 308Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-130
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
308
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
True Width
0.6 m
From
335.5 m
To
336.3 m
Intercept Depth
335.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-130:335.5-336.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval within the No. 2 Vein shows moderate silver equivalent grades, further defining mineralization in this secondary structure.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade
  • True width disclosed

Evidence · table

“308”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.6

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-131Silver Queen · silverGrade: 383Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-131
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
383
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.3 m
From
166.1 m
To
166.5 m
Intercept Depth
166.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-131:166.1-166.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept from a hangingwall vein shows moderate silver equivalent grades, indicating mineralization in a parallel structure.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade
  • True width disclosed

Evidence · table

“383”

Context: 0.4

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.3

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-131Silver Queen · silverGrade: 473Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-131
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
473
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
True Width
2.4 m
From
183 m
To
186 m
Intercept Depth
183 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-131:183-186
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade intercept from the No. 3 Vein is a significant result, confirming strong mineralization and contributing to the overall resource potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver equivalent intercept
  • Significant true width
  • Confirms mineralization in No. 3 Vein

Evidence · table

“473”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.4

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-131Silver Queen · silverGrade: 228Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-131
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
228
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.3 m
True Width
1 m
From
303.2 m
To
304.4 m
Intercept Depth
303.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-131:303.2-304.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept from the No. 2 Vein shows moderate silver equivalent grades, indicating mineralization in a secondary vein structure.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade
  • True width disclosed

Evidence · table

“228”

Context: 1.3

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-131Silver Queen · silverGrade: 471Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-131
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
471
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.3 m
From
304 m
To
304.4 m
Intercept Depth
304 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-131:304-304.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval within the No. 2 Vein further defines localized high-grade mineralization in this secondary structure.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver equivalent sub-interval
  • True width disclosed

Evidence · table

“471”

Context: 0.4

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.3

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-132Silver Queen · silverGrade: 154Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-132
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
154
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
True Width
0.4 m
From
188.1 m
To
188.6 m
Intercept Depth
188.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-132:188.1-188.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept from the No. 3 Vein shows moderate silver equivalent grades, indicating continued mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade
  • True width disclosed

Evidence · table

“154”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.4

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-132Silver Queen · silverGrade: 287Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-132
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
287
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
True Width
0.4 m
From
290.6 m
To
291 m
Intercept Depth
290.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-132:290.6-291
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept from the No. 2 Vein shows moderate silver equivalent grades, indicating mineralization in a secondary vein structure.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade
  • True width disclosed

Evidence · table

“287”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.4

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-133Silver Queen · silverGrade: 299Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-133
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
299
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
True Width
0.9 m
From
142.4 m
To
143.5 m
Intercept Depth
142.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-133:142.4-143.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept from a hangingwall vein shows moderate silver equivalent grades, indicating mineralization in a parallel structure.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade
  • True width disclosed

Evidence · table

“299”

Context: 1.2

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.9

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-133Silver Queen · silverGrade: 417Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-133
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
417
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
True Width
0.4 m
From
191.8 m
To
192.3 m
Intercept Depth
191.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-133:191.8-192.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept from a hangingwall vein shows high silver equivalent grades, indicating localized high-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver equivalent intercept
  • True width disclosed

Evidence · table

“417”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.4

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-133Silver Queen · silverGrade: 1100Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-133
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
1100
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.3 m
From
214.5 m
To
214.9 m
Intercept Depth
214.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-133:214.5-214.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept from the No. 3 Vein shows exceptional bonanza-grade silver equivalent, indicating very high-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional bonanza-grade silver equivalent intercept
  • True width disclosed

Evidence · table

“1100”

Context: 0.4

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.3

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-134Silver Queen · silverGrade: 597Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-134
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
597
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
True Width
0.8 m
From
161.3 m
To
162.3 m
Intercept Depth
161.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-134:161.3-162.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept from a hangingwall vein shows high silver equivalent grades, indicating localized high-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver equivalent intercept
  • True width disclosed

Evidence · table

“597”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.8

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-134Silver Queen · silverGrade: 468Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-134
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
468
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
True Width
0.4 m
From
173.4 m
To
173.9 m
Intercept Depth
173.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-134:173.4-173.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept from a hangingwall vein shows high silver equivalent grades, indicating localized high-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver equivalent intercept
  • True width disclosed

Evidence · table

“468”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.4

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-134Silver Queen · silverGrade: 259Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-134
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
259
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
True Width
1.5 m
From
209.2 m
To
211.2 m
Intercept Depth
209.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-134:209.2-211.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept from the No. 3 Vein shows moderate silver equivalent grades, indicating continued mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade
  • True width disclosed

Evidence · table

“259”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.5

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-135Silver Queen · silverGrade: 135Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-135
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
135
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
True Width
1.2 m
From
147.1 m
To
149.1 m
Intercept Depth
147.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-135:147.1-149.1
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept from a hangingwall vein shows moderate silver equivalent grades, indicating mineralization in a parallel structure.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade
  • True width disclosed

Evidence · table

“135”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.2

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-135Silver Queen · silverGrade: 1256Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-135
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
1256
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
True Width
0.3 m
From
167.9 m
To
168.4 m
Intercept Depth
167.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-135:167.9-168.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
16.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept from a hangingwall vein shows exceptional bonanza-grade silver equivalent, indicating very high-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional bonanza-grade silver equivalent intercept
  • True width disclosed

Evidence · table

“1256”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.3

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-135Silver Queen · silverGrade: 616Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-135
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
616
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
True Width
0.3 m
From
263.6 m
To
264.1 m
Intercept Depth
263.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-135:263.6-264.1
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept from a hangingwall vein shows high silver equivalent grades, indicating localized high-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver equivalent intercept
  • True width disclosed

Evidence · table

“616”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.3

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-135Silver Queen · silverGrade: 162Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-135
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
162
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.4 m
True Width
2.1 m
From
271.9 m
To
275.3 m
Intercept Depth
271.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-135:271.9-275.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept from the No. 3 Vein shows moderate silver equivalent grades, indicating continued mineralization despite high dilution.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver equivalent grade
  • True width disclosed

Negative factors

  • High reported dilution (50.7%)

Evidence · table

“162”

Context: 3.4

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.1

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-135Silver Queen · silverGrade: 419Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-135
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
419
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
True Width
0.3 m
From
271.9 m
To
272.4 m
Intercept Depth
271.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-135:271.9-272.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval within SQ24-135 demonstrates localized high-grade mineralization, enhancing the overall prospectivity of the zone.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver equivalent sub-interval
  • True width disclosed

Evidence · table

“419”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.3

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-136Silver Queen · silverGrade: 869Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-136
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
869
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
True Width
0.4 m
From
168.8 m
To
169.4 m
Intercept Depth
168.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-136:168.8-169.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
11.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very high-grade intercept indicates strong localized mineralization, contributing positively to the overall prospectivity.

Positive factors

  • Very high-grade silver equivalent intercept
  • True width disclosed

Evidence · table

“869”

Context: 0.6

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.4

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-136Silver Queen · silverGrade: 1841Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-136
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
1841
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
True Width
0.3 m
From
195.7 m
To
196.1 m
Intercept Depth
195.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-136:195.7-196.1
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
24.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This exceptional bonanza-grade intercept from a hangingwall vein, with very high copper, is a standout result indicating extremely rich mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional bonanza-grade silver equivalent intercept
  • True width disclosed
  • Very high copper grade (3.2% Cu)

Evidence · table

“1841”

Context: 0.4

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.3

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-136Silver Queen · silverGrade: 431Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-136
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
431
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
True Width
7.6 m
From
231.7 m
To
242.2 m
Intercept Depth
231.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-136:231.7-242.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade intercept over an exceptional true width from the No. 3 Vein is a key highlight, confirming strong mineralization and continuity in the target area.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver equivalent intercept
  • Exceptional true width (7.6m)
  • Confirms continuity of No. 3 Vein

Evidence · table

“431”

Context: 10.6

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 7.6

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-136Silver Queen · silverGrade: 1475Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-136
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
1475
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.2 m
True Width
1.6 m
From
238.4 m
To
240.6 m
Intercept Depth
238.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-136:238.4-240.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
19.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This exceptional bonanza-grade sub-interval within SQ24-136 is a standout result, indicating extremely high-grade mineralization within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional bonanza-grade silver equivalent sub-interval
  • Significant true width

Evidence · table

“1475”

Context: 2.2

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.6

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-129Silver Queen · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-129
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.2 m
From
152.7 m
To
154.9 m
Intercept Depth
152.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-129:152.7-154.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.5 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.5”

Context: SQ24-129

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-129Silver Queen · copperGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-129
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.2 m
From
152.7 m
To
154.9 m
Intercept Depth
152.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-129:152.7-154.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: SQ24-129

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-129Silver Queen · leadGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-129
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.2 m
From
152.7 m
To
154.9 m
Intercept Depth
152.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-129:152.7-154.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: SQ24-129

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-129Silver Queen · zincGrade: 3.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-129
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
3.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.2 m
From
152.7 m
To
154.9 m
Intercept Depth
152.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-129:152.7-154.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.6 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 7.9 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.6”

Context: SQ24-129

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · goldGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
1.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
154.3 m
To
154.9 m
Intercept Depth
154.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:154.3-154.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.7 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.7”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · silverGrade: 42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
42
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
154.3 m
To
154.9 m
Intercept Depth
154.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:154.3-154.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 42 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 25.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“42”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · copperGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.6 m
From
154.3 m
To
154.9 m
Intercept Depth
154.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:154.3-154.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.4”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · leadGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.6 m
From
154.3 m
To
154.9 m
Intercept Depth
154.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:154.3-154.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.4 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.4”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · zincGrade: 9.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
9.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.6 m
From
154.3 m
To
154.9 m
Intercept Depth
154.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:154.3-154.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.7 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 5.8 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.7”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-130Silver Queen · goldGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-130
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
1.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.7 m
From
197.7 m
To
199.4 m
Intercept Depth
197.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-130:197.7-199.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.4”

Context: SQ24-130

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-130Silver Queen · copperGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-130
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.7 m
From
197.7 m
To
199.4 m
Intercept Depth
197.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-130:197.7-199.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.9 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.1 % copper is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.1”

Context: SQ24-130

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-130Silver Queen · leadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-130
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.7 m
From
197.7 m
To
199.4 m
Intercept Depth
197.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-130:197.7-199.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: SQ24-130

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-130Silver Queen · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-130
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.7 m
From
197.7 m
To
199.4 m
Intercept Depth
197.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-130:197.7-199.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: SQ24-130

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-130Silver Queen · goldGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-130
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
2.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.2 m
From
209.2 m
To
213.5 m
Intercept Depth
209.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-130:209.2-213.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.8 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.8 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.8”

Context: SQ24-130

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-130Silver Queen · copperGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-130
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.2 m
From
209.2 m
To
213.5 m
Intercept Depth
209.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-130:209.2-213.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: SQ24-130

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-130Silver Queen · leadGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-130
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
1.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.2 m
From
209.2 m
To
213.5 m
Intercept Depth
209.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-130:209.2-213.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 5.9 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.4”

Context: SQ24-130

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-130Silver Queen · zincGrade: 6.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-130
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
6.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.2 m
From
209.2 m
To
213.5 m
Intercept Depth
209.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-130:209.2-213.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.9 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 29.0 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.9”

Context: SQ24-130

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · goldGrade: 4.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
4.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m
From
211.1 m
To
213.5 m
Intercept Depth
211.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:211.1-213.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.3 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.3”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · silverGrade: 92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m
From
211.1 m
To
213.5 m
Intercept Depth
211.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:211.1-213.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 92 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 220.8 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“92”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · copperGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.4 m
From
211.1 m
To
213.5 m
Intercept Depth
211.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:211.1-213.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · leadGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
1.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.4 m
From
211.1 m
To
213.5 m
Intercept Depth
211.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:211.1-213.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.8 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 4.3 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.8”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · zincGrade: 9.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
9.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.4 m
From
211.1 m
To
213.5 m
Intercept Depth
211.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:211.1-213.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.5 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 22.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.5”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · goldGrade: 4.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
4.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
From
211.4 m
To
212.8 m
Intercept Depth
211.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:211.4-212.8
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
18
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.7 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.7”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · silverGrade: 115Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
115
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
From
211.4 m
To
212.8 m
Intercept Depth
211.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:211.4-212.8
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
18
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 115 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 161.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“115”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · copperGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.4 m
From
211.4 m
To
212.8 m
Intercept Depth
211.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:211.4-212.8
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
18
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · leadGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
2.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.4 m
From
211.4 m
To
212.8 m
Intercept Depth
211.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:211.4-212.8
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
18
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.7 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.8 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.7”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · zincGrade: 13.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
13.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.4 m
From
211.4 m
To
212.8 m
Intercept Depth
211.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:211.4-212.8
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
18
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.8 % zinc is strong against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 19.3 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 13.8 % zinc is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.8”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-130Silver Queen · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-130
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.6 m
From
334.7 m
To
336.3 m
Intercept Depth
334.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-130:334.7-336.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: SQ24-130

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-130Silver Queen · copperGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-130
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.6 m
From
334.7 m
To
336.3 m
Intercept Depth
334.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-130:334.7-336.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: SQ24-130

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-130Silver Queen · leadGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-130
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.6 m
From
334.7 m
To
336.3 m
Intercept Depth
334.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-130:334.7-336.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.4 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.4”

Context: SQ24-130

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-130Silver Queen · zincGrade: 2.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-130
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
2.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.6 m
From
334.7 m
To
336.3 m
Intercept Depth
334.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-130:334.7-336.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.9 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 4.6 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.9”

Context: SQ24-130

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
335.5 m
To
336.3 m
Intercept Depth
335.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:335.5-336.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · silverGrade: 27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
335.5 m
To
336.3 m
Intercept Depth
335.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:335.5-336.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 27 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 21.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 27 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“27”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · copperGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.8 m
From
335.5 m
To
336.3 m
Intercept Depth
335.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:335.5-336.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · leadGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.8 m
From
335.5 m
To
336.3 m
Intercept Depth
335.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:335.5-336.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.6 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.6”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · zincGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
4.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.8 m
From
335.5 m
To
336.3 m
Intercept Depth
335.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:335.5-336.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.5 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.6 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.5”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-131Silver Queen · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-131
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
From
166.1 m
To
166.5 m
Intercept Depth
166.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-131:166.1-166.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: SQ24-131

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-131Silver Queen · copperGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-131
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
1.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
166.1 m
To
166.5 m
Intercept Depth
166.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-131:166.1-166.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.7 % copper is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.7”

Context: SQ24-131

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-131Silver Queen · leadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-131
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
166.1 m
To
166.5 m
Intercept Depth
166.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-131:166.1-166.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: SQ24-131

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-131Silver Queen · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-131
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
166.1 m
To
166.5 m
Intercept Depth
166.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-131:166.1-166.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: SQ24-131

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-131Silver Queen · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-131
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
183 m
To
186 m
Intercept Depth
183 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-131:183-186
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.5 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.5”

Context: SQ24-131

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-131Silver Queen · copperGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-131
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
183 m
To
186 m
Intercept Depth
183 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-131:183-186
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.2 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.4”

Context: SQ24-131

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-131Silver Queen · leadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-131
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
183 m
To
186 m
Intercept Depth
183 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-131:183-186
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: SQ24-131

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-131Silver Queen · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-131
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
183 m
To
186 m
Intercept Depth
183 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-131:183-186
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: SQ24-131

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-131Silver Queen · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-131
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.3 m
From
303.2 m
To
304.4 m
Intercept Depth
303.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-131:303.2-304.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.3”

Context: SQ24-131

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-131Silver Queen · copperGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-131
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.3 m
From
303.2 m
To
304.4 m
Intercept Depth
303.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-131:303.2-304.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: SQ24-131

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-131Silver Queen · leadGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-131
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.3 m
From
303.2 m
To
304.4 m
Intercept Depth
303.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-131:303.2-304.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.9 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.7 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.7”

Context: SQ24-131

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-131Silver Queen · zincGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-131
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
2.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.3 m
From
303.2 m
To
304.4 m
Intercept Depth
303.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-131:303.2-304.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.8 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.6 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.8”

Context: SQ24-131

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
From
304 m
To
304.4 m
Intercept Depth
304 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:304-304.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.4”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · silverGrade: 63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
From
304 m
To
304.4 m
Intercept Depth
304 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:304-304.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 63 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 25.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“63”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · copperGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
304 m
To
304.4 m
Intercept Depth
304 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:304-304.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · leadGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
304 m
To
304.4 m
Intercept Depth
304 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:304-304.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.1”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · zincGrade: 6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
304 m
To
304.4 m
Intercept Depth
304 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:304-304.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.4 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.0”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-132Silver Queen · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-132
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
188.1 m
To
188.6 m
Intercept Depth
188.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-132:188.1-188.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.7 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.7”

Context: SQ24-132

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-132Silver Queen · copperGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-132
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
188.1 m
To
188.6 m
Intercept Depth
188.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-132:188.1-188.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: SQ24-132

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-132Silver Queen · leadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-132
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
188.1 m
To
188.6 m
Intercept Depth
188.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-132:188.1-188.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: SQ24-132

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-132Silver Queen · zincGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-132
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
1.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
188.1 m
To
188.6 m
Intercept Depth
188.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-132:188.1-188.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.4 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.4”

Context: SQ24-132

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-132Silver Queen · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-132
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
290.6 m
To
291 m
Intercept Depth
290.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-132:290.6-291
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: SQ24-132

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-132Silver Queen · copperGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-132
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
290.6 m
To
291 m
Intercept Depth
290.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-132:290.6-291
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: SQ24-132

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-132Silver Queen · leadGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-132
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
1.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
290.6 m
To
291 m
Intercept Depth
290.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-132:290.6-291
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.4”

Context: SQ24-132

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-132Silver Queen · zincGrade: 3.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-132
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
3.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
290.6 m
To
291 m
Intercept Depth
290.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-132:290.6-291
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.3 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.6 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.3”

Context: SQ24-132

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-133Silver Queen · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-133
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
From
142.4 m
To
143.5 m
Intercept Depth
142.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-133:142.4-143.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.3”

Context: SQ24-133

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-133Silver Queen · copperGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-133
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.2 m
From
142.4 m
To
143.5 m
Intercept Depth
142.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-133:142.4-143.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.2 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1 % copper is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.0”

Context: SQ24-133

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-133Silver Queen · leadGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-133
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.2 m
From
142.4 m
To
143.5 m
Intercept Depth
142.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-133:142.4-143.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.3 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.3”

Context: SQ24-133

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-133Silver Queen · zincGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-133
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
1.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.2 m
From
142.4 m
To
143.5 m
Intercept Depth
142.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-133:142.4-143.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.2 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.2 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.2”

Context: SQ24-133

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-133Silver Queen · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-133
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
191.8 m
To
192.3 m
Intercept Depth
191.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-133:191.8-192.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.5 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.5”

Context: SQ24-133

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-133Silver Queen · copperGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-133
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
191.8 m
To
192.3 m
Intercept Depth
191.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-133:191.8-192.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.3 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.1 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 2.3 % copper is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.3”

Context: SQ24-133

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-133Silver Queen · leadGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-133
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
191.8 m
To
192.3 m
Intercept Depth
191.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-133:191.8-192.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: SQ24-133

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-133Silver Queen · zincGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-133
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
191.8 m
To
192.3 m
Intercept Depth
191.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-133:191.8-192.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.4 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.4”

Context: SQ24-133

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-133Silver Queen · goldGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-133
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
2.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
From
214.5 m
To
214.9 m
Intercept Depth
214.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-133:214.5-214.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.4”

Context: SQ24-133

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-133Silver Queen · copperGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-133
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
214.5 m
To
214.9 m
Intercept Depth
214.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-133:214.5-214.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: SQ24-133

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-133Silver Queen · leadGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-133
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
214.5 m
To
214.9 m
Intercept Depth
214.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-133:214.5-214.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.2 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: SQ24-133

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-133Silver Queen · zincGrade: 15.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-133
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
15.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
214.5 m
To
214.9 m
Intercept Depth
214.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-133:214.5-214.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.8 % zinc is strong against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 6.3 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 15.8 % zinc is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“15.8”

Context: SQ24-133

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-134Silver Queen · goldGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-134
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
1.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
161.3 m
To
162.3 m
Intercept Depth
161.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-134:161.3-162.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.3”

Context: SQ24-134

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-134Silver Queen · copperGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-134
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
1.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
161.3 m
To
162.3 m
Intercept Depth
161.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-134:161.3-162.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.3 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.3 % copper is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.3”

Context: SQ24-134

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-134Silver Queen · leadGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-134
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
161.3 m
To
162.3 m
Intercept Depth
161.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-134:161.3-162.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.4 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.4”

Context: SQ24-134

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-134Silver Queen · zincGrade: 3.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-134
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
3.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
161.3 m
To
162.3 m
Intercept Depth
161.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-134:161.3-162.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.8 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.8 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.8”

Context: SQ24-134

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-134Silver Queen · goldGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-134
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
173.4 m
To
173.9 m
Intercept Depth
173.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-134:173.4-173.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.5 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.5”

Context: SQ24-134

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-134Silver Queen · copperGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-134
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
173.4 m
To
173.9 m
Intercept Depth
173.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-134:173.4-173.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: SQ24-134

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-134Silver Queen · leadGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-134
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
173.4 m
To
173.9 m
Intercept Depth
173.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-134:173.4-173.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.4 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.4”

Context: SQ24-134

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-134Silver Queen · zincGrade: 5.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-134
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
5.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
173.4 m
To
173.9 m
Intercept Depth
173.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-134:173.4-173.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.8 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.9 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.8”

Context: SQ24-134

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-134Silver Queen · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-134
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
209.2 m
To
211.2 m
Intercept Depth
209.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-134:209.2-211.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.6 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.6”

Context: SQ24-134

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-134Silver Queen · copperGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-134
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
209.2 m
To
211.2 m
Intercept Depth
209.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-134:209.2-211.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: SQ24-134

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-134Silver Queen · leadGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-134
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
209.2 m
To
211.2 m
Intercept Depth
209.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-134:209.2-211.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2.2 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.1”

Context: SQ24-134

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-134Silver Queen · zincGrade: 2.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-134
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
2.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
209.2 m
To
211.2 m
Intercept Depth
209.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-134:209.2-211.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.6 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 5.2 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.6”

Context: SQ24-134

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-135Silver Queen · goldGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-135
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
147.1 m
To
149.1 m
Intercept Depth
147.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-135:147.1-149.1
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.8 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.8”

Context: SQ24-135

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-135Silver Queen · copperGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-135
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
147.1 m
To
149.1 m
Intercept Depth
147.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-135:147.1-149.1
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: SQ24-135

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-135Silver Queen · leadGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-135
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
147.1 m
To
149.1 m
Intercept Depth
147.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-135:147.1-149.1
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.2 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: SQ24-135

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-135Silver Queen · zincGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-135
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
147.1 m
To
149.1 m
Intercept Depth
147.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-135:147.1-149.1
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.1”

Context: SQ24-135

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-135Silver Queen · goldGrade: 4.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-135
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
4.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
167.9 m
To
168.4 m
Intercept Depth
167.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-135:167.9-168.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
16.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.2 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.2”

Context: SQ24-135

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-135Silver Queen · copperGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-135
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
167.9 m
To
168.4 m
Intercept Depth
167.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-135:167.9-168.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
16.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.3 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.1 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 2.3 % copper is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.3”

Context: SQ24-135

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-135Silver Queen · leadGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-135
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
167.9 m
To
168.4 m
Intercept Depth
167.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-135:167.9-168.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
16.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.4 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.4”

Context: SQ24-135

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-135Silver Queen · zincGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-135
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
2.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
167.9 m
To
168.4 m
Intercept Depth
167.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-135:167.9-168.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
16.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.7 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.4 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.7”

Context: SQ24-135

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-135Silver Queen · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-135
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
263.6 m
To
264.1 m
Intercept Depth
263.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-135:263.6-264.1
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: SQ24-135

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-135Silver Queen · copperGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-135
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
263.6 m
To
264.1 m
Intercept Depth
263.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-135:263.6-264.1
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: SQ24-135

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-135Silver Queen · leadGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-135
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
263.6 m
To
264.1 m
Intercept Depth
263.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-135:263.6-264.1
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.3 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.1 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.3”

Context: SQ24-135

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-135Silver Queen · zincGrade: 7.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-135
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
7.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
263.6 m
To
264.1 m
Intercept Depth
263.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-135:263.6-264.1
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.6 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.8 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.6”

Context: SQ24-135

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-135Silver Queen · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-135
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.4 m
From
271.9 m
To
275.3 m
Intercept Depth
271.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-135:271.9-275.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.7 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.7”

Context: SQ24-135

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-135Silver Queen · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-135
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.4 m
From
271.9 m
To
275.3 m
Intercept Depth
271.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-135:271.9-275.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.2 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: SQ24-135

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-135Silver Queen · leadGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-135
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.4 m
From
271.9 m
To
275.3 m
Intercept Depth
271.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-135:271.9-275.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.2 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: SQ24-135

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-135Silver Queen · zincGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-135
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.4 m
From
271.9 m
To
275.3 m
Intercept Depth
271.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-135:271.9-275.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.6 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.6”

Context: SQ24-135

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · goldGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
1.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
271.9 m
To
272.4 m
Intercept Depth
271.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:271.9-272.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.8 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.8 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.8”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · silverGrade: 149Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
149
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
271.9 m
To
272.4 m
Intercept Depth
271.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:271.9-272.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 149 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 74.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“149”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · copperGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
271.9 m
To
272.4 m
Intercept Depth
271.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:271.9-272.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.8”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · leadGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
271.9 m
To
272.4 m
Intercept Depth
271.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:271.9-272.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.2 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · zincGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
271.9 m
To
272.4 m
Intercept Depth
271.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:271.9-272.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.7 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.7”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-136Silver Queen · goldGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-136
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
2.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
168.8 m
To
169.4 m
Intercept Depth
168.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-136:168.8-169.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
11.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.1”

Context: SQ24-136

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-136Silver Queen · copperGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-136
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.6 m
From
168.8 m
To
169.4 m
Intercept Depth
168.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-136:168.8-169.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
11.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.1 % copper is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.1”

Context: SQ24-136

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-136Silver Queen · leadGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-136
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.6 m
From
168.8 m
To
169.4 m
Intercept Depth
168.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-136:168.8-169.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
11.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.4 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.4”

Context: SQ24-136

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-136Silver Queen · zincGrade: 6.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-136
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
6.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.6 m
From
168.8 m
To
169.4 m
Intercept Depth
168.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-136:168.8-169.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
11.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.7 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 4.0 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.7”

Context: SQ24-136

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-136Silver Queen · goldGrade: 8.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-136
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
8.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m
From
195.7 m
To
196.1 m
Intercept Depth
195.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-136:195.7-196.1
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
24.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.6 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 8.6 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.6”

Context: SQ24-136

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-136Silver Queen · copperGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-136
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
3.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
195.7 m
To
196.1 m
Intercept Depth
195.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-136:195.7-196.1
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
24.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.2 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.3 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.2 % copper is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.2”

Context: SQ24-136

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-136Silver Queen · leadGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-136
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
195.7 m
To
196.1 m
Intercept Depth
195.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-136:195.7-196.1
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
24.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.2 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: SQ24-136

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-136Silver Queen · zincGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-136
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
195.7 m
To
196.1 m
Intercept Depth
195.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-136:195.7-196.1
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
24.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.4 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.4”

Context: SQ24-136

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-136Silver Queen · goldGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-136
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.6 m
From
231.7 m
To
242.2 m
Intercept Depth
231.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-136:231.7-242.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.1”

Context: SQ24-136

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-136Silver Queen · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-136
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.6 m
From
231.7 m
To
242.2 m
Intercept Depth
231.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-136:231.7-242.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.2 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.3”

Context: SQ24-136

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-136Silver Queen · leadGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-136
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.6 m
From
231.7 m
To
242.2 m
Intercept Depth
231.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-136:231.7-242.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 7.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.7 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.7”

Context: SQ24-136

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

SQ24-136Silver Queen · zincGrade: 4.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SQ24-136
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
4.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.6 m
From
231.7 m
To
242.2 m
Intercept Depth
231.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SQ24-136:231.7-242.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.4 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 46.6 %·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.4”

Context: SQ24-136

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · goldGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.2 m
From
238.4 m
To
240.6 m
Intercept Depth
238.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:238.4-240.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
19.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 5.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.3”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · silverGrade: 121Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
121
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.2 m
From
238.4 m
To
240.6 m
Intercept Depth
238.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:238.4-240.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
19.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 121 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 266.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“121”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.2 m
From
238.4 m
To
240.6 m
Intercept Depth
238.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:238.4-240.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
19.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.3”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · leadGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
2.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.2 m
From
238.4 m
To
240.6 m
Intercept Depth
238.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:238.4-240.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
19.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.7 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 5.9 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.7”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

inc.Silver Queen · zincGrade: 19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Silver Queen
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
EQTY

Geometry

Grade
19
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.2 m
From
238.4 m
To
240.6 m
Intercept Depth
238.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:238.4-240.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
MS Analytical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
19.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-12-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19 % zinc is exceptional against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 41.8 %·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 19 % zinc is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“19.0”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "About Silver Queen Project The Silver Queen Project is a premier gold-silver property with over 100 years of historic ex"

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.