Exceptional assays show why high-grade core stands to super-charge early production profile at FireFly's Green Bay

Original announcement by tmx on Jul 2, 2026

Bullish

Company: FireFly Metals Ltd
Ticker: FFM
Exchange: TSX
Region: Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
Primary commodity: Copper
Secondary commodities: Gold, Silver, Zinc
Document categories: Drill results, Resource update
Extracted: 2026-09-12 03:20:48 UTC

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

FireFly Metals Ltd announced exceptional drill results from its Green Bay Copper-Gold Project in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, highlighting high-grade copper-gold mineralization over substantial widths. These results, including intercepts like 9.8m at 16.5% CuEq and 42.0m at 6.1% CuEq, demonstrate strong continuity and will be incorporated into an updated resource model to underpin economic studies. The drilling focused on infill and extension, aiming to upgrade Inferred resources to Measured and Indicated categories, thereby de-risking the project and enhancing its early production profile.

Reasoning: The drill results show exceptional high-grade copper-gold mineralization over significant widths, demonstrating strong continuity and extending known zones, which will positively impact upcoming economic studies and resource updates. The detailed QA/QC and QP/CP sign-off add high confidence to the results.

Positive factors

High-grade intercepts
Significant widths
Strong continuity of mineralization
Infill drilling converting Inferred to M&I
Extension of mineralization down-plunge and laterally
Results to be incorporated into economic studies
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed
True Width Disclosed

Negative factors

Apparent Width Only

Facts used in scoring: 89

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 89. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (89)

MUG25_246Green Bay · copperGrade: 5.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.1 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_246
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 5.4
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 4.1 m
From: 314.3 m
To: 318.4 m
Hole Depth: 357 m
Intercept Depth: 314.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_246:314.3-318.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1117
Northing: 2190.3
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -894 m
Azimuth: 215 °
Dip: -67 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 7.33
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade copper intercept from infill drilling, contributing to resource conversion.

Positive factors

High-grade intercept
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“5.40”

Context: 4.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_246Green Bay · goldGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.1 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_246
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: gold
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 2
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 4.1 m
From: 314.3 m
To: 318.4 m
Hole Depth: 357 m
Intercept Depth: 314.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_246:314.3-318.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1117
Northing: 2190.3
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -894 m
Azimuth: 215 °
Dip: -67 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 7.33
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: g/t
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good gold grade in a VMS zone, supporting the polymetallic nature of the deposit.

Positive factors

Strong gold grade
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“2.0”

Context: 4.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_246Green Bay · silverGrade: 13.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.1 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_246
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: silver
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 13.8
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 4.1 m
From: 314.3 m
To: 318.4 m
Hole Depth: 357 m
Intercept Depth: 314.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_246:314.3-318.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1117
Northing: 2190.3
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -894 m
Azimuth: 215 °
Dip: -67 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 7.33
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Silver grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Silver credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“13.8”

Context: 4.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_246Green Bay · zincGrade: 1.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.1 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_246
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: zinc
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.14
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 4.1 m
From: 314.3 m
To: 318.4 m
Hole Depth: 357 m
Intercept Depth: 314.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_246:314.3-318.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1117
Northing: 2190.3
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -894 m
Azimuth: 215 °
Dip: -67 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 7.33
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Zinc credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.14”

Context: 4.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_246Green Bay · copperGrade: 7.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.1 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_246
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 7.33
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 4.1 m
From: 314.3 m
To: 318.4 m
Hole Depth: 357 m
Intercept Depth: 314.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_246:314.3-318.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1117
Northing: 2190.3
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -894 m
Azimuth: 215 °
Dip: -67 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 7.33
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper equivalent grade over a good width, indicating significant mineralization.

Positive factors

High-grade metal equivalent
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“7.33”

Context: 4.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_247Green Bay · copperGrade: 3.68Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.3 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_247
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 3.68
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 2.3 m
From: 441.8 m
To: 444.1 m
Hole Depth: 690 m
Intercept Depth: 441.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_247:441.8-444.1
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 176 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 9.12
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade copper intercept from infill drilling, contributing to resource conversion.

Positive factors

High-grade intercept
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“3.68”

Context: 2.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_247Green Bay · goldGrade: 5.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_247
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: gold
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 5.9
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 2.3 m
From: 441.8 m
To: 444.1 m
Hole Depth: 690 m
Intercept Depth: 441.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_247:441.8-444.1
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 176 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 9.12
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: g/t
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade gold intercept in a VMS zone, supporting the polymetallic nature of the deposit.

Positive factors

Strong gold grade
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“5.9”

Context: 2.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_247Green Bay · silverGrade: 64.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_247
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: silver
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 64.8
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 2.3 m
From: 441.8 m
To: 444.1 m
Hole Depth: 690 m
Intercept Depth: 441.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_247:441.8-444.1
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 176 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 9.12
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Silver grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Silver credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“64.8”

Context: 2.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_247Green Bay · zincGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.3 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_247
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: zinc
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.62
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 2.3 m
From: 441.8 m
To: 444.1 m
Hole Depth: 690 m
Intercept Depth: 441.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_247:441.8-444.1
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 176 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 9.12
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Zinc credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“0.62”

Context: 2.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_247Green Bay · copperGrade: 9.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.3 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_247
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 9.12
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 2.3 m
From: 441.8 m
To: 444.1 m
Hole Depth: 690 m
Intercept Depth: 441.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_247:441.8-444.1
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 176 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 9.12
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Extremely high copper equivalent grade over a moderate width, indicating significant mineralization.

Positive factors

Exceptional metal equivalent grade
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“9.12”

Context: 2.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_247Green Bay · copperGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.5 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_247
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.33
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 3.5 m
From: 498 m
To: 501.5 m
Hole Depth: 690 m
Intercept Depth: 498 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_247:498-501.5
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 176 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.75
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper grade in a VMS zone, contributing to resource conversion.

Positive factors

Good copper grade
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.33”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_247Green Bay · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_247
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: gold
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.5
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 3.5 m
From: 498 m
To: 501.5 m
Hole Depth: 690 m
Intercept Depth: 498 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_247:498-501.5
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 176 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.75
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: g/t
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade meets the stated cutoff, contributing to the overall value.

Positive factors

Gold grade meets cutoff
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“0.5”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_247Green Bay · silverGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_247
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: silver
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.8
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 3.5 m
From: 498 m
To: 501.5 m
Hole Depth: 690 m
Intercept Depth: 498 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_247:498-501.5
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 176 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.75
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Silver grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Silver credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.8”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_247Green Bay · zincGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.5 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_247
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: zinc
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.07
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 3.5 m
From: 498 m
To: 501.5 m
Hole Depth: 690 m
Intercept Depth: 498 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_247:498-501.5
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 176 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.75
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace zinc grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Zinc credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_247Green Bay · copperGrade: 1.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.5 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_247
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.75
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 3.5 m
From: 498 m
To: 501.5 m
Hole Depth: 690 m
Intercept Depth: 498 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_247:498-501.5
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 176 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.75
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper equivalent grade over a moderate width, indicating significant mineralization.

Positive factors

Good metal equivalent grade
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.75”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_247Green Bay · copperGrade: 1.52Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.9 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_247
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.52
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 5.9 m
From: 533.2 m
To: 539 m
Hole Depth: 690 m
Intercept Depth: 533.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_247:533.2-539
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 176 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.71
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper grade in a footwall zone, contributing to resource conversion.

Positive factors

Good copper grade
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.52”

Context: 5.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_247Green Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.9 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_247
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: gold
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.2
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 5.9 m
From: 533.2 m
To: 539 m
Hole Depth: 690 m
Intercept Depth: 533.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_247:533.2-539
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 176 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.71
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace gold grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Gold credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: 5.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_247Green Bay · silverGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.9 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_247
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: silver
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.7
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 5.9 m
From: 533.2 m
To: 539 m
Hole Depth: 690 m
Intercept Depth: 533.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_247:533.2-539
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 176 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.71
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace silver grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Silver credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.7”

Context: 5.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_247Green Bay · zincGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.9 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_247
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: zinc
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.15
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 5.9 m
From: 533.2 m
To: 539 m
Hole Depth: 690 m
Intercept Depth: 533.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_247:533.2-539
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 176 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.71
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace zinc grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Zinc credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: 5.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_247Green Bay · copperGrade: 1.71Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.9 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_247
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.71
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 5.9 m
From: 533.2 m
To: 539 m
Hole Depth: 690 m
Intercept Depth: 533.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_247:533.2-539
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 176 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.71
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper equivalent grade over a moderate width, indicating significant mineralization.

Positive factors

Good metal equivalent grade
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.71”

Context: 5.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_247Green Bay · copperGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_247
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 24 m
From: 555 m
To: 579 m
Hole Depth: 690 m
Intercept Depth: 555 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_247:555-579
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 176 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.06
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant width with copper grade meeting cutoff, indicating a broad mineralized zone.

Positive factors

Significant width
Copper grade meets cutoff
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.00”

Context: 24.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_247Green Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_247
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: gold
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.1
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 24 m
From: 555 m
To: 579 m
Hole Depth: 690 m
Intercept Depth: 555 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_247:555-579
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 176 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.06
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace gold grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Gold credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: 24.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_247Green Bay · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_247
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: silver
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 24 m
From: 555 m
To: 579 m
Hole Depth: 690 m
Intercept Depth: 555 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_247:555-579
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 176 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.06
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace silver grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Silver credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.0”

Context: 24.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_247Green Bay · zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_247
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: zinc
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.01
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 24 m
From: 555 m
To: 579 m
Hole Depth: 690 m
Intercept Depth: 555 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_247:555-579
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 176 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.06
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace zinc grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Zinc credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 24.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_247Green Bay · copperGrade: 1.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_247
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.06
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 24 m
From: 555 m
To: 579 m
Hole Depth: 690 m
Intercept Depth: 555 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_247:555-579
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 176 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.06
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant width with copper equivalent grade meeting cutoff, indicating a broad mineralized zone.

Positive factors

Significant width
Metal equivalent grade meets cutoff
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.06”

Context: 24.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_247Green Bay · copperGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19.6 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_247
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.4
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 19.6 m
From: 602.5 m
To: 622 m
Hole Depth: 690 m
Intercept Depth: 602.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_247:602.5-622
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 176 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.45
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant width with copper grade meeting cutoff, indicating a broad mineralized zone.

Positive factors

Significant width
Copper grade meets cutoff
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.40”

Context: 19.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_247Green Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.6 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_247
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: gold
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.1
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 19.6 m
From: 602.5 m
To: 622 m
Hole Depth: 690 m
Intercept Depth: 602.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_247:602.5-622
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 176 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.45
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace gold grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Gold credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: 19.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_247Green Bay · silverGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.6 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_247
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: silver
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.9
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 19.6 m
From: 602.5 m
To: 622 m
Hole Depth: 690 m
Intercept Depth: 602.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_247:602.5-622
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 176 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.45
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace silver grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Silver credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.9”

Context: 19.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_247Green Bay · zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19.6 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_247
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: zinc
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.01
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 19.6 m
From: 602.5 m
To: 622 m
Hole Depth: 690 m
Intercept Depth: 602.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_247:602.5-622
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 176 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.45
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace zinc grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Zinc credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 19.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_247Green Bay · copperGrade: 1.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19.6 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_247
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.45
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 19.6 m
From: 602.5 m
To: 622 m
Hole Depth: 690 m
Intercept Depth: 602.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_247:602.5-622
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 176 °
Dip: -70 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.45
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant width with copper equivalent grade meeting cutoff, indicating a broad mineralized zone.

Positive factors

Significant width
Metal equivalent grade meets cutoff
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.45”

Context: 19.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_250Green Bay · copperGrade: 1.56Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.9 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_250
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.56
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 5.9 m
From: 505.9 m
To: 511.8 m
Hole Depth: 615 m
Intercept Depth: 505.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_250:505.9-511.8
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1222.1
Northing: 2255.1
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -906.4 m
Azimuth: 162 °
Dip: -63 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.64
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper grade in a footwall zone, contributing to resource conversion.

Positive factors

Good copper grade
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.56”

Context: 5.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_250Green Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.9 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_250
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: gold
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.1
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 5.9 m
From: 505.9 m
To: 511.8 m
Hole Depth: 615 m
Intercept Depth: 505.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_250:505.9-511.8
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1222.1
Northing: 2255.1
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -906.4 m
Azimuth: 162 °
Dip: -63 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.64
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace gold grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Gold credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: 5.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_250Green Bay · silverGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.9 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_250
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: silver
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.4
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 5.9 m
From: 505.9 m
To: 511.8 m
Hole Depth: 615 m
Intercept Depth: 505.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_250:505.9-511.8
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1222.1
Northing: 2255.1
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -906.4 m
Azimuth: 162 °
Dip: -63 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.64
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace silver grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Silver credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.4”

Context: 5.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_250Green Bay · zincGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.9 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_250
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: zinc
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.04
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 5.9 m
From: 505.9 m
To: 511.8 m
Hole Depth: 615 m
Intercept Depth: 505.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_250:505.9-511.8
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1222.1
Northing: 2255.1
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -906.4 m
Azimuth: 162 °
Dip: -63 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.64
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace zinc grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Zinc credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 5.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_250Green Bay · copperGrade: 1.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.9 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_250
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.64
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 5.9 m
From: 505.9 m
To: 511.8 m
Hole Depth: 615 m
Intercept Depth: 505.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_250:505.9-511.8
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1222.1
Northing: 2255.1
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -906.4 m
Azimuth: 162 °
Dip: -63 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.64
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper equivalent grade over a moderate width, indicating significant mineralization.

Positive factors

Good metal equivalent grade
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.64”

Context: 5.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_250Green Bay · copperGrade: 1.79Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.2 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_250
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.79
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 10.2 m
From: 528.8 m
To: 539 m
Hole Depth: 615 m
Intercept Depth: 528.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_250:528.8-539
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1222.1
Northing: 2255.1
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -906.4 m
Azimuth: 162 °
Dip: -63 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.87
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper grade over a moderate width in a footwall zone, contributing to resource conversion.

Positive factors

Good copper grade
Moderate width
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.79”

Context: 10.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_250Green Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.2 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_250
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: gold
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.1
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 10.2 m
From: 528.8 m
To: 539 m
Hole Depth: 615 m
Intercept Depth: 528.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_250:528.8-539
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1222.1
Northing: 2255.1
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -906.4 m
Azimuth: 162 °
Dip: -63 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.87
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace gold grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Gold credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: 10.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_250Green Bay · silverGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.2 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_250
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: silver
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.5
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 10.2 m
From: 528.8 m
To: 539 m
Hole Depth: 615 m
Intercept Depth: 528.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_250:528.8-539
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1222.1
Northing: 2255.1
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -906.4 m
Azimuth: 162 °
Dip: -63 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.87
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace silver grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Silver credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.5”

Context: 10.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_250Green Bay · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.2 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_250
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: zinc
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.02
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 10.2 m
From: 528.8 m
To: 539 m
Hole Depth: 615 m
Intercept Depth: 528.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_250:528.8-539
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1222.1
Northing: 2255.1
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -906.4 m
Azimuth: 162 °
Dip: -63 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.87
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace zinc grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Zinc credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: 10.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_250Green Bay · copperGrade: 1.87Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.2 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_250
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.87
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 10.2 m
From: 528.8 m
To: 539 m
Hole Depth: 615 m
Intercept Depth: 528.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_250:528.8-539
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1222.1
Northing: 2255.1
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -906.4 m
Azimuth: 162 °
Dip: -63 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.87
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper equivalent grade over a moderate width, indicating significant mineralization.

Positive factors

Good metal equivalent grade
Moderate width
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.87”

Context: 10.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_250Green Bay · copperGrade: 1.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.2 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_250
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.31
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 16.2 m
From: 546.3 m
To: 562.4 m
Hole Depth: 615 m
Intercept Depth: 546.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_250:546.3-562.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1222.1
Northing: 2255.1
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -906.4 m
Azimuth: 162 °
Dip: -63 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.37
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper grade over a moderate width in a footwall zone, contributing to resource conversion.

Positive factors

Good copper grade
Moderate width
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.31”

Context: 16.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_250Green Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.2 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_250
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: gold
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.1
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 16.2 m
From: 546.3 m
To: 562.4 m
Hole Depth: 615 m
Intercept Depth: 546.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_250:546.3-562.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1222.1
Northing: 2255.1
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -906.4 m
Azimuth: 162 °
Dip: -63 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.37
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace gold grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Gold credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: 16.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_250Green Bay · silverGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.2 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_250
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: silver
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.3
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 16.2 m
From: 546.3 m
To: 562.4 m
Hole Depth: 615 m
Intercept Depth: 546.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_250:546.3-562.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1222.1
Northing: 2255.1
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -906.4 m
Azimuth: 162 °
Dip: -63 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.37
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace silver grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Silver credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.3”

Context: 16.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_250Green Bay · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.2 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_250
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: zinc
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.02
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 16.2 m
From: 546.3 m
To: 562.4 m
Hole Depth: 615 m
Intercept Depth: 546.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_250:546.3-562.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1222.1
Northing: 2255.1
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -906.4 m
Azimuth: 162 °
Dip: -63 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.37
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace zinc grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Zinc credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: 16.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_250Green Bay · copperGrade: 1.37Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.2 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_250
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.37
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 16.2 m
From: 546.3 m
To: 562.4 m
Hole Depth: 615 m
Intercept Depth: 546.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_250:546.3-562.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1222.1
Northing: 2255.1
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -906.4 m
Azimuth: 162 °
Dip: -63 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.37
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper equivalent grade over a moderate width, indicating significant mineralization.

Positive factors

Good metal equivalent grade
Moderate width
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.37”

Context: 16.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_250Green Bay · copperGrade: 1.59Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.9 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_250
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.59
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 11.9 m
From: 567.5 m
To: 579.4 m
Hole Depth: 615 m
Intercept Depth: 567.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_250:567.5-579.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1222.1
Northing: 2255.1
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -906.4 m
Azimuth: 162 °
Dip: -63 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.66
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper grade over a moderate width in a footwall zone, contributing to resource conversion.

Positive factors

Good copper grade
Moderate width
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.59”

Context: 11.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_250Green Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.9 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_250
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: gold
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.1
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 11.9 m
From: 567.5 m
To: 579.4 m
Hole Depth: 615 m
Intercept Depth: 567.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_250:567.5-579.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1222.1
Northing: 2255.1
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -906.4 m
Azimuth: 162 °
Dip: -63 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.66
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace gold grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Gold credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: 11.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_250Green Bay · silverGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.9 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_250
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: silver
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.7
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 11.9 m
From: 567.5 m
To: 579.4 m
Hole Depth: 615 m
Intercept Depth: 567.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_250:567.5-579.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1222.1
Northing: 2255.1
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -906.4 m
Azimuth: 162 °
Dip: -63 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.66
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace silver grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Silver credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.7”

Context: 11.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_250Green Bay · zincGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.9 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_250
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: zinc
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.03
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 11.9 m
From: 567.5 m
To: 579.4 m
Hole Depth: 615 m
Intercept Depth: 567.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_250:567.5-579.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1222.1
Northing: 2255.1
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -906.4 m
Azimuth: 162 °
Dip: -63 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.66
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace zinc grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Zinc credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: 11.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_250Green Bay · copperGrade: 1.66Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.9 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_250
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.66
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 11.9 m
From: 567.5 m
To: 579.4 m
Hole Depth: 615 m
Intercept Depth: 567.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_250:567.5-579.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1222.1
Northing: 2255.1
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -906.4 m
Azimuth: 162 °
Dip: -63 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.66
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper equivalent grade over a moderate width, indicating significant mineralization.

Positive factors

Good metal equivalent grade
Moderate width
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.66”

Context: 11.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_255Green Bay · copperGrade: 3.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.5 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_255
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 3.05
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 10.5 m
From: 319.8 m
To: 330.3 m
Hole Depth: 357 m
Intercept Depth: 319.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_255:319.8-330.3
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1117
Northing: 2190.3
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -894 m
Azimuth: 223 °
Dip: -57 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 4.86
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade copper intercept over a moderate width, contributing to resource conversion.

Positive factors

High-grade intercept
Moderate width
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“3.05”

Context: 10.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_255Green Bay · goldGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.5 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_255
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: gold
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.8
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 10.5 m
From: 319.8 m
To: 330.3 m
Hole Depth: 357 m
Intercept Depth: 319.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_255:319.8-330.3
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1117
Northing: 2190.3
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -894 m
Azimuth: 223 °
Dip: -57 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 4.86
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: g/t
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good gold grade in a VMS zone, supporting the polymetallic nature of the deposit.

Positive factors

Strong gold grade
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.8”

Context: 10.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_255Green Bay · silverGrade: 16.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.5 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_255
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: silver
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 16.5
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 10.5 m
From: 319.8 m
To: 330.3 m
Hole Depth: 357 m
Intercept Depth: 319.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_255:319.8-330.3
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1117
Northing: 2190.3
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -894 m
Azimuth: 223 °
Dip: -57 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 4.86
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Silver grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Silver credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“16.5”

Context: 10.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_255Green Bay · zincGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.5 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_255
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: zinc
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.5
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 10.5 m
From: 319.8 m
To: 330.3 m
Hole Depth: 357 m
Intercept Depth: 319.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_255:319.8-330.3
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1117
Northing: 2190.3
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -894 m
Azimuth: 223 °
Dip: -57 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 4.86
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Zinc credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.50”

Context: 10.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_255Green Bay · copperGrade: 4.86Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.5 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_255
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 4.86
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 10.5 m
From: 319.8 m
To: 330.3 m
Hole Depth: 357 m
Intercept Depth: 319.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_255:319.8-330.3
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1117
Northing: 2190.3
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -894 m
Azimuth: 223 °
Dip: -57 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 4.86
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High copper equivalent grade over a moderate width, indicating significant mineralization.

Positive factors

High-grade metal equivalent
Moderate width
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“4.86”

Context: 10.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_257Green Bay · copperGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.3 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_257
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 3.2
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 2.3 m
True Width: 1.6 m
From: 285.1 m
To: 287.4 m
Hole Depth: 363 m
Intercept Depth: 285.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_257:285.1-287.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1137.5
Northing: 1972
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -842.4 m
Azimuth: 226 °
Dip: -9 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 7.68
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade copper intercept with true width disclosed, contributing to resource conversion.

Positive factors

High-grade intercept
True Width Disclosed
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“3.20”

Context: 2.3 (1.6m TW)

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.6

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_257Green Bay · goldGrade: 4.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_257
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: gold
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 4.9
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 2.3 m
True Width: 1.6 m
From: 285.1 m
To: 287.4 m
Hole Depth: 363 m
Intercept Depth: 285.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_257:285.1-287.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1137.5
Northing: 1972
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -842.4 m
Azimuth: 226 °
Dip: -9 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 7.68
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: g/t
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade gold intercept with true width disclosed, supporting the polymetallic nature of the deposit.

Positive factors

Strong gold grade
True Width Disclosed
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“4.9”

Context: 2.3 (1.6m TW)

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.6

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_257Green Bay · silverGrade: 31.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_257
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: silver
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 31.3
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 2.3 m
True Width: 1.6 m
From: 285.1 m
To: 287.4 m
Hole Depth: 363 m
Intercept Depth: 285.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_257:285.1-287.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1137.5
Northing: 1972
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -842.4 m
Azimuth: 226 °
Dip: -9 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 7.68
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Silver grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Silver credit
True Width Disclosed
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“31.3”

Context: 2.3 (1.6m TW)

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.6

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_257Green Bay · zincGrade: 1.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.3 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_257
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: zinc
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.36
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 2.3 m
True Width: 1.6 m
From: 285.1 m
To: 287.4 m
Hole Depth: 363 m
Intercept Depth: 285.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_257:285.1-287.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1137.5
Northing: 1972
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -842.4 m
Azimuth: 226 °
Dip: -9 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 7.68
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Zinc credit
True Width Disclosed
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.36”

Context: 2.3 (1.6m TW)

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.6

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_257Green Bay · copperGrade: 7.68Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.3 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_257
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 7.68
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 2.3 m
True Width: 1.6 m
From: 285.1 m
To: 287.4 m
Hole Depth: 363 m
Intercept Depth: 285.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_257:285.1-287.4
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1137.5
Northing: 1972
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -842.4 m
Azimuth: 226 °
Dip: -9 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 7.68
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Extremely high copper equivalent grade over a moderate width, indicating significant mineralization.

Positive factors

Exceptional metal equivalent grade
True Width Disclosed
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“7.68”

Context: 2.3 (1.6m TW)

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.6

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_257Green Bay · copperGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.3 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_257
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.8
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 5.3 m
True Width: 4.8 m
From: 291.4 m
To: 296.7 m
Hole Depth: 363 m
Intercept Depth: 291.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_257:291.4-296.7
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1137.5
Northing: 1972
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -842.4 m
Azimuth: 226 °
Dip: -9 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 2.17
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Copper grade is below the stated cutoff, but true width is disclosed and it contributes to the overall CuEq.

Positive factors

True Width Disclosed
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Negative factors

Copper grade below cutoff

Evidence · table

“0.80”

Context: 5.3 (4.8m TW)

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 4.8

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_257Green Bay · goldGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.3 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_257
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: gold
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.6
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 5.3 m
True Width: 4.8 m
From: 291.4 m
To: 296.7 m
Hole Depth: 363 m
Intercept Depth: 291.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_257:291.4-296.7
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1137.5
Northing: 1972
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -842.4 m
Azimuth: 226 °
Dip: -9 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 2.17
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 0.5
Cutoff Unit: g/t
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good gold grade with true width disclosed, supporting the polymetallic nature of the deposit.

Positive factors

Strong gold grade
True Width Disclosed
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.6”

Context: 5.3 (4.8m TW)

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 4.8

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_257Green Bay · silverGrade: 6.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.3 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_257
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: silver
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 6.2
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 5.3 m
True Width: 4.8 m
From: 291.4 m
To: 296.7 m
Hole Depth: 363 m
Intercept Depth: 291.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_257:291.4-296.7
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1137.5
Northing: 1972
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -842.4 m
Azimuth: 226 °
Dip: -9 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 2.17
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace silver grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Silver credit
True Width Disclosed
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“6.2”

Context: 5.3 (4.8m TW)

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 4.8

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_257Green Bay · zincGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.3 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_257
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: zinc
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.24
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 5.3 m
True Width: 4.8 m
From: 291.4 m
To: 296.7 m
Hole Depth: 363 m
Intercept Depth: 291.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_257:291.4-296.7
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1137.5
Northing: 1972
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -842.4 m
Azimuth: 226 °
Dip: -9 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 2.17
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace zinc grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Zinc credit
True Width Disclosed
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: 5.3 (4.8m TW)

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 4.8

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_257Green Bay · copperGrade: 2.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.3 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_257
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 2.17
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 5.3 m
True Width: 4.8 m
From: 291.4 m
To: 296.7 m
Hole Depth: 363 m
Intercept Depth: 291.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_257:291.4-296.7
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1137.5
Northing: 1972
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -842.4 m
Azimuth: 226 °
Dip: -9 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 2.17
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper equivalent grade with true width disclosed, indicating significant mineralization.

Positive factors

Good metal equivalent grade
True Width Disclosed
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“2.17”

Context: 5.3 (4.8m TW)

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 4.8

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_258Green Bay · copperGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_258
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.33
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 12 m
From: 517 m
To: 529 m
Hole Depth: 696 m
Intercept Depth: 517 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_258:517-529
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 172 °
Dip: -76 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.51
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper grade over a moderate width in a footwall zone, contributing to resource conversion.

Positive factors

Good copper grade
Moderate width
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.33”

Context: 12.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_258Green Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_258
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: gold
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.2
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 12 m
From: 517 m
To: 529 m
Hole Depth: 696 m
Intercept Depth: 517 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_258:517-529
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 172 °
Dip: -76 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.51
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace gold grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Gold credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: 12.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_258Green Bay · silverGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_258
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: silver
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.3
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 12 m
From: 517 m
To: 529 m
Hole Depth: 696 m
Intercept Depth: 517 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_258:517-529
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 172 °
Dip: -76 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.51
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace silver grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Silver credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.3”

Context: 12.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_258Green Bay · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_258
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: zinc
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.1
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 12 m
From: 517 m
To: 529 m
Hole Depth: 696 m
Intercept Depth: 517 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_258:517-529
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 172 °
Dip: -76 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.51
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace zinc grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Zinc credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 12.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_258Green Bay · copperGrade: 1.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_258
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.51
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 12 m
From: 517 m
To: 529 m
Hole Depth: 696 m
Intercept Depth: 517 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_258:517-529
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 172 °
Dip: -76 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.51
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper equivalent grade over a moderate width, indicating significant mineralization.

Positive factors

Good metal equivalent grade
Moderate width
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.51”

Context: 12.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_258Green Bay · copperGrade: 1.82Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.7 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_258
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.82
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 8.7 m
From: 557.3 m
To: 566 m
Hole Depth: 696 m
Intercept Depth: 557.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_258:557.3-566
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 172 °
Dip: -76 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 2.04
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper grade over a moderate width in a footwall zone, contributing to resource conversion.

Positive factors

Good copper grade
Moderate width
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.82”

Context: 8.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_258Green Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.7 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_258
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: gold
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.2
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 8.7 m
From: 557.3 m
To: 566 m
Hole Depth: 696 m
Intercept Depth: 557.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_258:557.3-566
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 172 °
Dip: -76 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 2.04
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace gold grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Gold credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: 8.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_258Green Bay · silverGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.7 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_258
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: silver
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.9
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 8.7 m
From: 557.3 m
To: 566 m
Hole Depth: 696 m
Intercept Depth: 557.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_258:557.3-566
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 172 °
Dip: -76 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 2.04
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace silver grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Silver credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.9”

Context: 8.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_258Green Bay · zincGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.7 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_258
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: zinc
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.03
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 8.7 m
From: 557.3 m
To: 566 m
Hole Depth: 696 m
Intercept Depth: 557.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_258:557.3-566
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 172 °
Dip: -76 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 2.04
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace zinc grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Zinc credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: 8.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_258Green Bay · copperGrade: 2.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.7 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_258
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 2.04
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 8.7 m
From: 557.3 m
To: 566 m
Hole Depth: 696 m
Intercept Depth: 557.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_258:557.3-566
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 172 °
Dip: -76 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 2.04
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper equivalent grade over a moderate width, indicating significant mineralization.

Positive factors

Good metal equivalent grade
Moderate width
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“2.04”

Context: 8.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_258Green Bay · copperGrade: 1.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.2 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_258
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.39
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 5.2 m
From: 598 m
To: 603.2 m
Hole Depth: 696 m
Intercept Depth: 598 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_258:598-603.2
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 172 °
Dip: -76 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.46
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper grade in a footwall zone, contributing to resource conversion.

Positive factors

Good copper grade
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.39”

Context: 5.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_258Green Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.2 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_258
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: gold
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.1
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 5.2 m
From: 598 m
To: 603.2 m
Hole Depth: 696 m
Intercept Depth: 598 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_258:598-603.2
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 172 °
Dip: -76 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.46
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace gold grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Gold credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: 5.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_258Green Bay · silverGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_258
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: silver
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.2
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 5.2 m
From: 598 m
To: 603.2 m
Hole Depth: 696 m
Intercept Depth: 598 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_258:598-603.2
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 172 °
Dip: -76 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.46
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: Yes
Review Reason: historical_restatement
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: Yes

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace silver grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Silver credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.2”

Context: 5.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_258Green Bay · zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.2 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_258
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: zinc
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.01
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 5.2 m
From: 598 m
To: 603.2 m
Hole Depth: 696 m
Intercept Depth: 598 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_258:598-603.2
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 172 °
Dip: -76 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.46
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace zinc grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Zinc credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 5.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_258Green Bay · copperGrade: 1.46Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.2 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_258
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.46
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 5.2 m
From: 598 m
To: 603.2 m
Hole Depth: 696 m
Intercept Depth: 598 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_258:598-603.2
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 172 °
Dip: -76 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.46
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper equivalent grade over a moderate width, indicating significant mineralization.

Positive factors

Good metal equivalent grade
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.46”

Context: 5.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_258Green Bay · copperGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_258
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.2
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 3 m
From: 611 m
To: 614 m
Hole Depth: 696 m
Intercept Depth: 611 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_258:611-614
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 172 °
Dip: -76 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.24
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Copper grade meets cutoff in a footwall zone, contributing to resource conversion.

Positive factors

Copper grade meets cutoff
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.20”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_258Green Bay · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_258
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: gold
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 3 m
From: 611 m
To: 614 m
Hole Depth: 696 m
Intercept Depth: 611 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_258:611-614
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 172 °
Dip: -76 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.24
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is negligible, but the intercept contributes to the overall CuEq.

Positive factors

QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Negative factors

Gold grade below cutoff

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_258Green Bay · silverGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_258
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: silver
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.9
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 3 m
From: 611 m
To: 614 m
Hole Depth: 696 m
Intercept Depth: 611 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_258:611-614
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 172 °
Dip: -76 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.24
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace silver grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Silver credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“0.9”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_258Green Bay · zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_258
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: zinc
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.01
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 3 m
From: 611 m
To: 614 m
Hole Depth: 696 m
Intercept Depth: 611 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_258:611-614
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 172 °
Dip: -76 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.24
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace zinc grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Zinc credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_258Green Bay · copperGrade: 1.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_258
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.24
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 3 m
From: 611 m
To: 614 m
Hole Depth: 696 m
Intercept Depth: 611 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_258:611-614
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 172 °
Dip: -76 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 1.24
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Copper equivalent grade meets cutoff in a footwall zone, contributing to resource conversion.

Positive factors

Metal equivalent grade meets cutoff
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.24”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_258Green Bay · copperGrade: 1.97Grade Unit: %Intercept: 31.3 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_258
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: copper
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 1.97
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 31.3 m
From: 628.8 m
To: 660 m
Hole Depth: 696 m
Intercept Depth: 628.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_258:628.8-660
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 172 °
Dip: -76 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 2.07
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade: 1
Cutoff Unit: %
Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper grade over a strong width in a footwall zone, contributing to resource conversion.

Positive factors

Good copper grade
Strong continuity
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“1.97”

Context: 31.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_258Green Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 31.3 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_258
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: gold
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.1
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 31.3 m
From: 628.8 m
To: 660 m
Hole Depth: 696 m
Intercept Depth: 628.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_258:628.8-660
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 172 °
Dip: -76 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 2.07
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace gold grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Gold credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: 31.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_258Green Bay · silverGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 31.3 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_258
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: silver
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 2.4
Grade Unit: g/t
Intercept: 31.3 m
From: 628.8 m
To: 660 m
Hole Depth: 696 m
Intercept Depth: 628.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_258:628.8-660
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 172 °
Dip: -76 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 2.07
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace silver grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Silver credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“2.4”

Context: 31.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

MUG25_258Green Bay · zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 31.3 mView all details

Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID: MUG25_258
Project: Green Bay
Commodity: zinc
Region: canada_nl
Reported Region: canada_nl
Ticker: FFM

Geometry

Grade: 0.01
Grade Unit: %
Intercept: 31.3 m
From: 628.8 m
To: 660 m
Hole Depth: 696 m
Intercept Depth: 628.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type: vms
Program: mixed
Sample Type: drill
Group ID: MUG25_258:628.8-660
Mining Method: underground

Location

Location: Upper Zone
Easting: 1255.5
Northing: 2355.8
CRS: local Ming Mine grid
Elevation: -916.9 m
Azimuth: 172 °
Dip: -76 °
Loc. Confidence: high
Loc. Source: document

QA/QC

Laboratory: Eastern Analytical and SGS
QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
QP Signed: Yes
QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade: 2.07
Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed: Yes
Max Dilution: 6 m

Review

Needs Review: No
Interp. Status: scored
Historical: No

Dates

Event date: 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace zinc grade contributes to the overall polymetallic value of the intercept.

Positive factors

Zinc credit
QA/QC Disclosed
QP/CP Signed

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 31.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Green Bay (Ming Mine) Mineral Resource Development As of 31 May 2026, the Company had completed ~192,000 metres of under"

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.