Final assays for Golden Eye ahead of Resource Update
Original announcement by yahoo_press on
- Company
- Cygnus Metals Limited
- Ticker
- CYG
- Exchange
- TSXV
- Region
- Quebec
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Copper, Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-09-19 05:55:07 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Cygnus Metals Limited announced final infill drilling results from its Golden Eye deposit, including high-grade intercepts such as 3.0m at 39.5g/t AuEq (35.0g/t Au, 3.1% Cu) in hole LDR-26-18. These results are part of a strategy to convert Inferred resources to Indicated ahead of an upcoming resource update. The company also commenced exploration drilling at the Gwillim gold target with JV partner Alamos Gold, aiming to establish a new resource.
Reasoning: The document reports strong infill drill results from the Golden Eye deposit, including bonanza gold and copper grades, which are explicitly aimed at upgrading Inferred resources to Indicated. This de-risks the project and supports an upcoming resource update. Additionally, new exploration drilling has commenced at the Gwillim gold target with a major JV partner, indicating future growth. The project benefits from existing infrastructure.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold and copper intercepts, including bonanza grades, confirm continuity and support resource conversion.
- Drilling successfully targets conversion of Inferred to Indicated resources, de-risking the project.
- New exploration drilling commenced at Gwillim gold target with JV partner Alamos Gold, indicating future growth potential.
- Project benefits from established infrastructure in the Chibougamau region, reducing development risk.
Negative factors
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated for all intercepts, which may overstate apparent thickness.
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 1120
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: The intercept of 35.0 g/t Au over 3.0 m in LDR-26-18 is exceptionally high-grade for gold.
Evidence · text
“Including 3m at 39.5g/t AuEq (35.0g/t Au, 3.1% Cu & 30.6g/t Ag)”
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: The intercept of 17.8 g/t Au over 2.5 m in LDR-26-17 is exceptionally high-grade for gold.
Evidence · text
“Including 2.5m at 22.3g/t AuEq (17.8g/t Au, 3.0% Cu & 31.1g/t Ag)”
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: The intercept of 9.6 g/t Au over 1.5 m in LDR-26-17 is exceptionally high-grade for gold.
Evidence · text
“inc 286.0 287.5 1.5 19.7 9.6 2.3 13.0”
Context: 1.5
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states the drilling is 'infill drilling results from the Golden Eye deposit' and 'to convert Inferred resources into the higher confidence Indicated category'.
Evidence · text
“final infill drilling results from the Golden Eye deposit”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document states 'True width estimated to be between 70-90% of downhole thickness' for the Golden Eye drill results, indicating that true width is not precisely stated for each intercept.
Evidence · text
“True width estimated to be between 70-90% of downhole thickness.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The document states that 'The scientific and technical information in this announcement has been reviewed and approved by Mr Louis Beaupre, the Quebec Exploration Manager of Cygnus, a “qualified person” as defined in National Instrument 43-101'.
Evidence · text
“The scientific and technical information in this announcement has been reviewed and approved by Mr Louis Beaupre, the Quebec Exploration Manager of Cygnus, a “qualified person” as defined in National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: The document states that the resource estimate was reported 'in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) and the Joint Ore Reserves Committee (JORC) Code (2012 Edition)'.
Evidence · text
“prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) and the Joint Ore Reserves Committee (JORC) Code (2012 Edition).”
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: The document states that the resource estimate was reported 'in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) and the Joint Ore Reserves Committee (JORC) Code (2012 Edition)'.
Evidence · text
“prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) and the Joint Ore Reserves Committee (JORC) Code (2012 Edition).”
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: The document announces 'Final assays for Golden Eye ahead of Resource Update' and includes 'APPENDIX B – Mineral Resource Estimate for the Chibougamau Project as at 17 September 2025'.
Evidence · text
“Final assays for Golden Eye ahead of Resource Update”
Category Upgradepositive
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Why it applies: The company's strategy is explicitly stated as 'to upgrade Inferred Resources to Indicated'.
Evidence · text
“Results are in line with Cygnus’ strategy to convert Inferred Resources into the higher confidence Indicated category.”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Mr Louis Beaupre, a 'qualified person' and 'Competent Person', reviewed and approved the scientific and technical information.
Evidence · text
“The scientific and technical information in this announcement has been reviewed and approved by Mr Louis Beaupre, the Quebec Exploration Manager of Cygnus, a “qualified person” as defined in National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: A current resource fact retains the disclosed cut-off grade
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 1120. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (1064)
LDR-26-15Golden Eye · silverGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-15
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 225.9 m
- To
- 229 m
- Hole Depth
- 288 m
- Intercept Depth
- 225.9 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-15:225.9-229
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549489
- Northing
- 5525283
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 237 °
- Dip
- -66 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“3.7”
Context: 3.1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-15Golden Eye · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-15
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 225.9 m
- To
- 229 m
- Hole Depth
- 288 m
- Intercept Depth
- 225.9 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-15:225.9-229
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549489
- Northing
- 5525283
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 237 °
- Dip
- -66 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.7”
Context: 3.1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-15Golden Eye · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-15
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 225.9 m
- To
- 229 m
- Hole Depth
- 288 m
- Intercept Depth
- 225.9 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-15:225.9-229
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549489
- Northing
- 5525283
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 237 °
- Dip
- -66 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: 3.1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-16Golden Eye · silverGrade: 6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-16
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 246.5 m
- To
- 247.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 400 m
- Intercept Depth
- 246.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-16:246.5-247.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549560
- Northing
- 5525346
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 216 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“6.0”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-16Golden Eye · goldGrade: 3.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-16
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 246.5 m
- To
- 247.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 400 m
- Intercept Depth
- 246.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-16:246.5-247.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549560
- Northing
- 5525346
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 216 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“3.8”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-16Golden Eye · copperGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-16
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 246.5 m
- To
- 247.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 400 m
- Intercept Depth
- 246.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-16:246.5-247.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549560
- Northing
- 5525346
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 216 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.8”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-16Golden Eye · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-16
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- From
- 295.5 m
- To
- 298.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 400 m
- Intercept Depth
- 295.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-16:295.5-298.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549560
- Northing
- 5525346
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 216 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: 2.6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-16Golden Eye · goldGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-16
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- From
- 295.5 m
- To
- 298.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 400 m
- Intercept Depth
- 295.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-16:295.5-298.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549560
- Northing
- 5525346
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 216 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“2.3”
Context: 2.6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-16Golden Eye · copperGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-16
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- From
- 295.5 m
- To
- 298.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 400 m
- Intercept Depth
- 295.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-16:295.5-298.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549560
- Northing
- 5525346
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 216 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: 2.6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-16Golden Eye · silverGrade: 5.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-16
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.6 m
- From
- 314.5 m
- To
- 321 m
- Hole Depth
- 400 m
- Intercept Depth
- 314.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-16:314.5-321
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549560
- Northing
- 5525346
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 216 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“5.2”
Context: 6.6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-16Golden Eye · goldGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-16
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.6 m
- From
- 314.5 m
- To
- 321 m
- Hole Depth
- 400 m
- Intercept Depth
- 314.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-16:314.5-321
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549560
- Northing
- 5525346
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 216 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: 6.6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-16Golden Eye · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-16
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.6 m
- From
- 314.5 m
- To
- 321 m
- Hole Depth
- 400 m
- Intercept Depth
- 314.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-16:314.5-321
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549560
- Northing
- 5525346
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 216 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak copper grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: 6.6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-16Golden Eye · silverGrade: 9.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-16
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- From
- 314.5 m
- To
- 316.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 400 m
- Intercept Depth
- 314.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-16:314.5-316.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549560
- Northing
- 5525346
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 216 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“9.4”
Context: 1.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-16Golden Eye · goldGrade: 6.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-16
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- From
- 314.5 m
- To
- 316.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 400 m
- Intercept Depth
- 314.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-16:314.5-316.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549560
- Northing
- 5525346
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 216 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a bonanza gold grade over a narrow width, significantly contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“6.4”
Context: 1.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-16Golden Eye · copperGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-16
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- From
- 314.5 m
- To
- 316.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 400 m
- Intercept Depth
- 314.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-16:314.5-316.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549560
- Northing
- 5525346
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 216 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: 1.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-17Golden Eye · silverGrade: 3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-17
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 164.7 m
- To
- 166.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 300 m
- Intercept Depth
- 164.7 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-17:164.7-166.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549386
- Northing
- 5525394
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 217 °
- Dip
- -63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“3.0”
Context: 1.4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-17Golden Eye · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-17
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 164.7 m
- To
- 166.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 300 m
- Intercept Depth
- 164.7 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-17:164.7-166.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549386
- Northing
- 5525394
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 217 °
- Dip
- -63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: 1.4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-17Golden Eye · copperGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-17
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 164.7 m
- To
- 166.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 300 m
- Intercept Depth
- 164.7 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-17:164.7-166.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549386
- Northing
- 5525394
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 217 °
- Dip
- -63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.9”
Context: 1.4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-17Golden Eye · silverGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-17
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 191.6 m
- To
- 193 m
- Hole Depth
- 300 m
- Intercept Depth
- 191.6 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-17:191.6-193
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549386
- Northing
- 5525394
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 217 °
- Dip
- -63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“3.7”
Context: 1.4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-17Golden Eye · goldGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-17
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 191.6 m
- To
- 193 m
- Hole Depth
- 300 m
- Intercept Depth
- 191.6 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-17:191.6-193
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549386
- Northing
- 5525394
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 217 °
- Dip
- -63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.8”
Context: 1.4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-17Golden Eye · copperGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-17
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 191.6 m
- To
- 193 m
- Hole Depth
- 300 m
- Intercept Depth
- 191.6 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-17:191.6-193
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549386
- Northing
- 5525394
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 217 °
- Dip
- -63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.9”
Context: 1.4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-17Golden Eye · silverGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-17
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.3 m
- From
- 210.1 m
- To
- 212.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 300 m
- Intercept Depth
- 210.1 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-17:210.1-212.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549386
- Northing
- 5525394
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 217 °
- Dip
- -63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: 2.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-17Golden Eye · goldGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-17
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.3 m
- From
- 210.1 m
- To
- 212.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 300 m
- Intercept Depth
- 210.1 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-17:210.1-212.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549386
- Northing
- 5525394
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 217 °
- Dip
- -63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 2.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-17Golden Eye · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-17
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.3 m
- From
- 210.1 m
- To
- 212.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 300 m
- Intercept Depth
- 210.1 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-17:210.1-212.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549386
- Northing
- 5525394
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 217 °
- Dip
- -63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: 2.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-17Golden Eye · silverGrade: 22.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-17
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 22.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 218 m
- To
- 221.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 300 m
- Intercept Depth
- 218 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-17:218-221.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549386
- Northing
- 5525394
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 217 °
- Dip
- -63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 15.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“22.3”
Context: 3.6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-17Golden Eye · goldGrade: 12.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-17
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 218 m
- To
- 221.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 300 m
- Intercept Depth
- 218 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-17:218-221.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549386
- Northing
- 5525394
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 217 °
- Dip
- -63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 15.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a bonanza gold grade over a narrow width, significantly contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“12.4”
Context: 3.6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-17Golden Eye · copperGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-17
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 218 m
- To
- 221.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 300 m
- Intercept Depth
- 218 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-17:218-221.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549386
- Northing
- 5525394
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 217 °
- Dip
- -63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 15.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“2.2”
Context: 3.6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-17Golden Eye · silverGrade: 31.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-17
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 31.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 218.6 m
- To
- 221.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 300 m
- Intercept Depth
- 218.6 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-17:218.6-221.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549386
- Northing
- 5525394
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 217 °
- Dip
- -63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 22.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“31.1”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-17Golden Eye · goldGrade: 17.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-17
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 218.6 m
- To
- 221.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 300 m
- Intercept Depth
- 218.6 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-17:218.6-221.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549386
- Northing
- 5525394
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 217 °
- Dip
- -63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 22.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a bonanza gold grade over a narrow width, significantly contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“17.8”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-17Golden Eye · copperGrade: 3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-17
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 218.6 m
- To
- 221.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 300 m
- Intercept Depth
- 218.6 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-17:218.6-221.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549386
- Northing
- 5525394
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 217 °
- Dip
- -63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 22.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong copper grade over a narrow width, significantly contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“3.0”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-17Golden Eye · silverGrade: 11.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-17
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 284 m
- To
- 287.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 300 m
- Intercept Depth
- 284 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-17:284-287.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549386
- Northing
- 5525394
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 217 °
- Dip
- -63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“11.3”
Context: 3.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-17Golden Eye · goldGrade: 4.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-17
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 284 m
- To
- 287.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 300 m
- Intercept Depth
- 284 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-17:284-287.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549386
- Northing
- 5525394
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 217 °
- Dip
- -63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“4.9”
Context: 3.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-17Golden Eye · copperGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-17
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 284 m
- To
- 287.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 300 m
- Intercept Depth
- 284 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-17:284-287.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549386
- Northing
- 5525394
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 217 °
- Dip
- -63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 3.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-17Golden Eye · silverGrade: 19.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-17
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 286 m
- To
- 287.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 300 m
- Intercept Depth
- 286 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-17:286-287.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549386
- Northing
- 5525394
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 217 °
- Dip
- -63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“19.7”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-17Golden Eye · goldGrade: 9.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-17
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 286 m
- To
- 287.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 300 m
- Intercept Depth
- 286 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-17:286-287.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549386
- Northing
- 5525394
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 217 °
- Dip
- -63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a bonanza gold grade over a narrow width, significantly contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“9.6”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-17Golden Eye · copperGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-17
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 286 m
- To
- 287.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 300 m
- Intercept Depth
- 286 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-17:286-287.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549386
- Northing
- 5525394
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 217 °
- Dip
- -63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong copper grade over a narrow width, significantly contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“2.3”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-18Golden Eye · silverGrade: 12.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-18
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.4 m
- From
- 135.4 m
- To
- 143.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 340 m
- Intercept Depth
- 135.4 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-18:135.4-143.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549576
- Northing
- 5525247
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 230 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 16.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“12.5”
Context: 8.4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-18Golden Eye · goldGrade: 14.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-18
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.4 m
- From
- 135.4 m
- To
- 143.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 340 m
- Intercept Depth
- 135.4 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-18:135.4-143.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549576
- Northing
- 5525247
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 230 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 16.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a bonanza gold grade over a moderate width, significantly contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“14.4”
Context: 8.4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-18Golden Eye · copperGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-18
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.4 m
- From
- 135.4 m
- To
- 143.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 340 m
- Intercept Depth
- 135.4 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-18:135.4-143.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549576
- Northing
- 5525247
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 230 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 16.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong copper grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 8.4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-18Golden Eye · silverGrade: 30.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-18
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 30.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 136.4 m
- To
- 139.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 340 m
- Intercept Depth
- 136.4 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-18:136.4-139.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549576
- Northing
- 5525247
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 230 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 39.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“30.6”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-18Golden Eye · goldGrade: 35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-18
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 136.4 m
- To
- 139.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 340 m
- Intercept Depth
- 136.4 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-18:136.4-139.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549576
- Northing
- 5525247
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 230 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 39.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptionally high-grade gold value over a narrow width, representing a bonanza intercept that significantly contributes to resource conversion.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“35.0”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-18Golden Eye · copperGrade: 3.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-18
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 136.4 m
- To
- 139.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 340 m
- Intercept Depth
- 136.4 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-18:136.4-139.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549576
- Northing
- 5525247
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 230 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 39.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong copper grade over a narrow width, significantly contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“3.1”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-18Golden Eye · silverGrade: 4.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-18
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 245.4 m
- To
- 248.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 340 m
- Intercept Depth
- 245.4 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-18:245.4-248.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549576
- Northing
- 5525247
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 230 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“4.6”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-18Golden Eye · goldGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-18
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 245.4 m
- To
- 248.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 340 m
- Intercept Depth
- 245.4 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-18:245.4-248.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549576
- Northing
- 5525247
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 230 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.9”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-18Golden Eye · copperGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-18
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 245.4 m
- To
- 248.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 340 m
- Intercept Depth
- 245.4 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-18:245.4-248.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549576
- Northing
- 5525247
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 230 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-19Golden Eye · silverGrade: 6.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-19
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 261 m
- To
- 263.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 354 m
- Intercept Depth
- 261 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-19:261-263.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549477
- Northing
- 5525382
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 215 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“6.5”
Context: 2.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-19Golden Eye · goldGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-19
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 261 m
- To
- 263.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 354 m
- Intercept Depth
- 261 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-19:261-263.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549477
- Northing
- 5525382
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 215 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“3.2”
Context: 2.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-19Golden Eye · copperGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-19
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 261 m
- To
- 263.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 354 m
- Intercept Depth
- 261 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-19:261-263.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549477
- Northing
- 5525382
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 215 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: 2.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-19Golden Eye · silverGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-19
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- From
- 287.7 m
- To
- 292.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 354 m
- Intercept Depth
- 287.7 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-19:287.7-292.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549477
- Northing
- 5525382
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 215 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: 5.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-19Golden Eye · goldGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-19
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- From
- 287.7 m
- To
- 292.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 354 m
- Intercept Depth
- 287.7 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-19:287.7-292.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549477
- Northing
- 5525382
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 215 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.2”
Context: 5.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-19Golden Eye · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-19
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- From
- 287.7 m
- To
- 292.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 354 m
- Intercept Depth
- 287.7 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-19:287.7-292.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549477
- Northing
- 5525382
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 215 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak copper grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: 5.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-19Golden Eye · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-19
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- From
- 304.5 m
- To
- 306 m
- Hole Depth
- 354 m
- Intercept Depth
- 304.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-19:304.5-306
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549477
- Northing
- 5525382
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 215 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: 1.6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-19Golden Eye · goldGrade: 2.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-19
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- From
- 304.5 m
- To
- 306 m
- Hole Depth
- 354 m
- Intercept Depth
- 304.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-19:304.5-306
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549477
- Northing
- 5525382
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 215 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“2.6”
Context: 1.6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-19Golden Eye · copperGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-19
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- From
- 304.5 m
- To
- 306 m
- Hole Depth
- 354 m
- Intercept Depth
- 304.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-19:304.5-306
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549477
- Northing
- 5525382
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 215 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a trace copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: 1.6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-20Golden Eye · silverGrade: 6.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-20
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 329.6 m
- To
- 334.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 381 m
- Intercept Depth
- 329.6 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-20:329.6-334.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549389
- Northing
- 5525497
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 221 °
- Dip
- -57 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“6.3”
Context: 4.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-20Golden Eye · goldGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-20
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 329.6 m
- To
- 334.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 381 m
- Intercept Depth
- 329.6 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-20:329.6-334.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549389
- Northing
- 5525497
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 221 °
- Dip
- -57 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“2.7”
Context: 4.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-20Golden Eye · copperGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-20
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 329.6 m
- To
- 334.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 381 m
- Intercept Depth
- 329.6 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-20:329.6-334.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549389
- Northing
- 5525497
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 221 °
- Dip
- -57 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: 4.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-20Golden Eye · silverGrade: 8.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-20
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 329.6 m
- To
- 330.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 381 m
- Intercept Depth
- 329.6 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-20:329.6-330.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549389
- Northing
- 5525497
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 221 °
- Dip
- -57 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 8.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“8.9”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-20Golden Eye · goldGrade: 7.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-20
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 329.6 m
- To
- 330.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 381 m
- Intercept Depth
- 329.6 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-20:329.6-330.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549389
- Northing
- 5525497
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 221 °
- Dip
- -57 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 8.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a bonanza gold grade over a narrow width, significantly contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“7.6”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-20Golden Eye · copperGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-20
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 329.6 m
- To
- 330.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 381 m
- Intercept Depth
- 329.6 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-20:329.6-330.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549389
- Northing
- 5525497
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 221 °
- Dip
- -57 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 8.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.8”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-21Golden Eye · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-21
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 256 m
- To
- 257.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 357 m
- Intercept Depth
- 256 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-21:256-257.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549430
- Northing
- 5525418
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 225 °
- Dip
- -58 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-21Golden Eye · goldGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-21
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 256 m
- To
- 257.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 357 m
- Intercept Depth
- 256 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-21:256-257.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549430
- Northing
- 5525418
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 225 °
- Dip
- -58 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-21Golden Eye · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-21
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 256 m
- To
- 257.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 357 m
- Intercept Depth
- 256 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-21:256-257.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549430
- Northing
- 5525418
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 225 °
- Dip
- -58 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-21Golden Eye · silverGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-21
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 262.3 m
- To
- 264.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 357 m
- Intercept Depth
- 262.3 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-21:262.3-264.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549430
- Northing
- 5525418
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 225 °
- Dip
- -58 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“3.7”
Context: 2.4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-21Golden Eye · goldGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-21
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 262.3 m
- To
- 264.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 357 m
- Intercept Depth
- 262.3 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-21:262.3-264.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549430
- Northing
- 5525418
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 225 °
- Dip
- -58 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: 2.4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-21Golden Eye · copperGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-21
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 262.3 m
- To
- 264.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 357 m
- Intercept Depth
- 262.3 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-21:262.3-264.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549430
- Northing
- 5525418
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 225 °
- Dip
- -58 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: 2.4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-21Golden Eye · silverGrade: 6.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-21
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- From
- 322.3 m
- To
- 324.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 357 m
- Intercept Depth
- 322.3 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-21:322.3-324.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549430
- Northing
- 5525418
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 225 °
- Dip
- -58 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“6.1”
Context: 2.6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-21Golden Eye · goldGrade: 3.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-21
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- From
- 322.3 m
- To
- 324.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 357 m
- Intercept Depth
- 322.3 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-21:322.3-324.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549430
- Northing
- 5525418
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 225 °
- Dip
- -58 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“3.8”
Context: 2.6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-21Golden Eye · copperGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-21
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- From
- 322.3 m
- To
- 324.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 357 m
- Intercept Depth
- 322.3 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-21:322.3-324.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549430
- Northing
- 5525418
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 225 °
- Dip
- -58 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: 2.6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-22Golden Eye · silverGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-22
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 456 m
- To
- 462 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
- Intercept Depth
- 456 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-22:456-462
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549521
- Northing
- 5525533
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 231 °
- Dip
- -59 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 6.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-22Golden Eye · goldGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-22
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 456 m
- To
- 462 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
- Intercept Depth
- 456 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-22:456-462
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549521
- Northing
- 5525533
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 231 °
- Dip
- -59 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.2”
Context: 6.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-22Golden Eye · copperGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-22
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 456 m
- To
- 462 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
- Intercept Depth
- 456 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-22:456-462
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549521
- Northing
- 5525533
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 231 °
- Dip
- -59 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak copper grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: 6.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-22Golden Eye · silverGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-22
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 460 m
- To
- 462 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
- Intercept Depth
- 460 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-22:460-462
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549521
- Northing
- 5525533
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 231 °
- Dip
- -59 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“2.5”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-22Golden Eye · goldGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-22
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 460 m
- To
- 462 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
- Intercept Depth
- 460 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-22:460-462
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549521
- Northing
- 5525533
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 231 °
- Dip
- -59 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“2.4”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-22Golden Eye · copperGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-22
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 460 m
- To
- 462 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
- Intercept Depth
- 460 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-22:460-462
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549521
- Northing
- 5525533
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 231 °
- Dip
- -59 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-22Golden Eye · silverGrade: 3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-22
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 503 m
- To
- 505.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
- Intercept Depth
- 503 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-22:503-505.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549521
- Northing
- 5525533
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 231 °
- Dip
- -59 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“3.0”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-22Golden Eye · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-22
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 503 m
- To
- 505.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
- Intercept Depth
- 503 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-22:503-505.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549521
- Northing
- 5525533
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 231 °
- Dip
- -59 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.7”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-22Golden Eye · copperGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-22
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 503 m
- To
- 505.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
- Intercept Depth
- 503 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-22:503-505.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549521
- Northing
- 5525533
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 231 °
- Dip
- -59 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-23Golden Eye · silverGrade: 3.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-23
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 300 m
- To
- 302 m
- Hole Depth
- 411 m
- Intercept Depth
- 300 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-23:300-302
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549389
- Northing
- 5525497
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 225 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“3.4”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-23Golden Eye · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-23
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 300 m
- To
- 302 m
- Hole Depth
- 411 m
- Intercept Depth
- 300 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-23:300-302
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549389
- Northing
- 5525497
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 225 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-23Golden Eye · copperGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-23
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 300 m
- To
- 302 m
- Hole Depth
- 411 m
- Intercept Depth
- 300 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-23:300-302
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549389
- Northing
- 5525497
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 225 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.1”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-23Golden Eye · silverGrade: 8.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-23
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 312.3 m
- To
- 315 m
- Hole Depth
- 411 m
- Intercept Depth
- 312.3 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-23:312.3-315
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549389
- Northing
- 5525497
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 225 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“8.5”
Context: 2.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-23Golden Eye · goldGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-23
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 312.3 m
- To
- 315 m
- Hole Depth
- 411 m
- Intercept Depth
- 312.3 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-23:312.3-315
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549389
- Northing
- 5525497
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 225 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.1”
Context: 2.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-23Golden Eye · copperGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-23
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 312.3 m
- To
- 315 m
- Hole Depth
- 411 m
- Intercept Depth
- 312.3 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-23:312.3-315
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549389
- Northing
- 5525497
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 225 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: 2.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-23Golden Eye · silverGrade: 17.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-23
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- From
- 362.5 m
- To
- 364.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 411 m
- Intercept Depth
- 362.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-23:362.5-364.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549389
- Northing
- 5525497
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 225 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 10.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“17.3”
Context: 1.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-23Golden Eye · goldGrade: 8.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-23
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- From
- 362.5 m
- To
- 364.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 411 m
- Intercept Depth
- 362.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-23:362.5-364.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549389
- Northing
- 5525497
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 225 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 10.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a bonanza gold grade over a narrow width, significantly contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“8.2”
Context: 1.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-23Golden Eye · copperGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-23
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- From
- 362.5 m
- To
- 364.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 411 m
- Intercept Depth
- 362.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-23:362.5-364.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549389
- Northing
- 5525497
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 225 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 10.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong copper grade over a narrow width, significantly contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.8”
Context: 1.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-24Golden Eye · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-24
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 253 m
- To
- 254.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 253 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-24:253-254.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549477
- Northing
- 5525382
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 243 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-24Golden Eye · goldGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-24
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 253 m
- To
- 254.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 253 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-24:253-254.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549477
- Northing
- 5525382
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 243 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“2.2”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-24Golden Eye · copperGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-24
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 253 m
- To
- 254.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 253 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-24:253-254.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549477
- Northing
- 5525382
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 243 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a trace copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-24Golden Eye · silverGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-24
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- From
- 292.1 m
- To
- 294 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 292.1 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-24:292.1-294
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549477
- Northing
- 5525382
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 243 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.8”
Context: 1.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-24Golden Eye · goldGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-24
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- From
- 292.1 m
- To
- 294 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 292.1 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-24:292.1-294
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549477
- Northing
- 5525382
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 243 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.2”
Context: 1.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-24Golden Eye · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-24
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- From
- 292.1 m
- To
- 294 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 292.1 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-24:292.1-294
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549477
- Northing
- 5525382
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 243 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: 1.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-24Golden Eye · silverGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-24
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.2 m
- From
- 298.5 m
- To
- 306.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 298.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-24:298.5-306.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549477
- Northing
- 5525382
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 243 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: 8.2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-24Golden Eye · goldGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-24
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.2 m
- From
- 298.5 m
- To
- 306.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 298.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-24:298.5-306.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549477
- Northing
- 5525382
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 243 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.8”
Context: 8.2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-24Golden Eye · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-24
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.2 m
- From
- 298.5 m
- To
- 306.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 298.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-24:298.5-306.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549477
- Northing
- 5525382
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 243 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak copper grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: 8.2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-24Golden Eye · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-24
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 327.2 m
- To
- 329.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 327.2 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-24:327.2-329.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549477
- Northing
- 5525382
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 243 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-24Golden Eye · goldGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-24
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 327.2 m
- To
- 329.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 327.2 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-24:327.2-329.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549477
- Northing
- 5525382
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 243 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.2”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-24Golden Eye · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-24
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 327.2 m
- To
- 329.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 327.2 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-24:327.2-329.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549477
- Northing
- 5525382
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 243 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-24Golden Eye · silverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-24
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
- From
- 333.8 m
- To
- 337.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 333.8 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-24:333.8-337.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549477
- Northing
- 5525382
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 243 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“4.0”
Context: 3.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-24Golden Eye · goldGrade: 2.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-24
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
- From
- 333.8 m
- To
- 337.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 333.8 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-24:333.8-337.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549477
- Northing
- 5525382
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 243 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“2.6”
Context: 3.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-24Golden Eye · copperGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-24
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
- From
- 333.8 m
- To
- 337.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 333.8 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-24:333.8-337.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549477
- Northing
- 5525382
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 243 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: 3.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-25Golden Eye · silverGrade: 4.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-25
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 346 m
- To
- 349.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 432 m
- Intercept Depth
- 346 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-25:346-349.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549426
- Northing
- 5525531
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 216 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“4.3”
Context: 3.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-25Golden Eye · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-25
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 346 m
- To
- 349.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 432 m
- Intercept Depth
- 346 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-25:346-349.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549426
- Northing
- 5525531
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 216 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: 3.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-25Golden Eye · copperGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-25
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 346 m
- To
- 349.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 432 m
- Intercept Depth
- 346 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-25:346-349.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549426
- Northing
- 5525531
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 216 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: 3.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-25Golden Eye · silverGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-25
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 352.5 m
- To
- 355 m
- Hole Depth
- 432 m
- Intercept Depth
- 352.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-25:352.5-355
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549426
- Northing
- 5525531
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 216 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“2.2”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-25Golden Eye · goldGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-25
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 352.5 m
- To
- 355 m
- Hole Depth
- 432 m
- Intercept Depth
- 352.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-25:352.5-355
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549426
- Northing
- 5525531
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 216 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-25Golden Eye · copperGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-25
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 352.5 m
- To
- 355 m
- Hole Depth
- 432 m
- Intercept Depth
- 352.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-25:352.5-355
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549426
- Northing
- 5525531
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 216 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-25Golden Eye · silverGrade: 5.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-25
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.6 m
- From
- 409.3 m
- To
- 415.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 432 m
- Intercept Depth
- 409.3 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-25:409.3-415.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549426
- Northing
- 5525531
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 216 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“5.1”
Context: 6.6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-25Golden Eye · goldGrade: 5.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-25
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.6 m
- From
- 409.3 m
- To
- 415.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 432 m
- Intercept Depth
- 409.3 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-25:409.3-415.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549426
- Northing
- 5525531
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 216 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a moderate width, significantly contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“5.4”
Context: 6.6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
LDR-26-25Golden Eye · copperGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LDR-26-25
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.6 m
- From
- 409.3 m
- To
- 415.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 432 m
- Intercept Depth
- 409.3 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LDR-26-25:409.3-415.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 549426
- Northing
- 5525531
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Elevation
- 376 m
- Azimuth
- 216 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate copper grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall resource conversion effort.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.7”
Context: 6.6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
CB-04-1Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-1
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 14.8 m
- From
- 132.3 m
- To
- 147.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 132.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-1:132.3-147.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.4 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 35.5 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.4 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.4”
Context: CB-04-1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-1Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-1
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.8 m
- From
- 132.3 m
- To
- 147.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 132.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-1:132.3-147.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-10Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-10
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.6 m
- From
- 138.3 m
- To
- 143.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 138.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-10:138.3-143.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 11.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: CB-04-10
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-10Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-10
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.6 m
- From
- 138.3 m
- To
- 143.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 138.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-10:138.3-143.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-10
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-11Corner Bay · copperGrade: 6.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-11
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.3 m
- From
- 146.4 m
- To
- 148.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 146.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-11:146.4-148.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.2 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 14.3 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 6.2 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.2”
Context: CB-04-11
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-11Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-11
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.3 m
- From
- 146.4 m
- To
- 148.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 146.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-11:146.4-148.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.7 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.7”
Context: CB-04-11
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-11Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-11
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.2 m
- From
- 149.3 m
- To
- 149.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 149.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-11:149.3-149.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.6 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.6 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.6”
Context: CB-04-11
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-11Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-11
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.2 m
- From
- 149.3 m
- To
- 149.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 149.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-11:149.3-149.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-04-11
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-12Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-12
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 180.6 m
- To
- 181.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 180.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-12:180.6-181.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.9 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.3 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.9 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.9”
Context: CB-04-12
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-12Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-12
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 180.6 m
- To
- 181.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 180.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-12:180.6-181.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-12
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-13Corner Bay · copperGrade: 11.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-13
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 213.4 m
- To
- 219.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 213.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-13:213.4-219.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -74 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 12.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.7 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 71.4 %·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 11.7 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.7”
Context: CB-04-13
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-13Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-13
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 213.4 m
- To
- 219.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 213.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-13:213.4-219.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -74 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 12.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.6 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: CB-04-13
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-14Corner Bay · copperGrade: 4.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-14
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 106.3 m
- To
- 109.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 106.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-14:106.3-109.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.2 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 13.4 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4.2 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.2”
Context: CB-04-14
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-14Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-14
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 106.3 m
- To
- 109.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 106.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-14:106.3-109.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-04-14
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-15Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-15
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 100.1 m
- To
- 104.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 100.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-15:100.1-104.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -64 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 5.9 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.3 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: CB-04-15
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-15Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-15
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 100.1 m
- To
- 104.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 100.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-15:100.1-104.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -64 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-15
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-15Corner Bay · copperGrade: 4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-15
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.1 m
- From
- 114.6 m
- To
- 124.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 114.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-15:114.6-124.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -64 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 40.4 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.0”
Context: CB-04-15
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-15Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-15
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.1 m
- From
- 114.6 m
- To
- 124.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 114.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-15:114.6-124.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -64 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-04-15
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-16Corner Bay · copperGrade: 5.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-16
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 158.7 m
- To
- 162.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 158.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-16:158.7-162.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.3 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 20.1 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.3 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.3”
Context: CB-04-16
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-16Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-16
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 158.7 m
- To
- 162.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 158.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-16:158.7-162.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-04-16
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-17Corner Bay · copperGrade: 9.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-17
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 182.3 m
- To
- 194.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 182.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-17:182.3-194.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 9.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.4 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 112.8 %·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 9.4 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.4”
Context: CB-04-17
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-17Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-17
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 182.3 m
- To
- 194.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 182.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-17:182.3-194.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 9.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.5 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: CB-04-17
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-18Corner Bay · copperGrade: 5.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-18
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 72.5 m
- To
- 73.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-18:72.5-73.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.3 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 4.2 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.3 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.3”
Context: CB-04-18
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-18Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-18
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 72.5 m
- To
- 73.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-18:72.5-73.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-04-18
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-18Corner Bay · copperGrade: 5.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-18
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 84.6 m
- To
- 86.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 84.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-18:84.6-86.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.9 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 12.4 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.9 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.9”
Context: CB-04-18
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-18Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-18
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 84.6 m
- To
- 86.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 84.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-18:84.6-86.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.6 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: CB-04-18
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-19Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-19
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.2 m
- From
- 113.5 m
- To
- 115.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 113.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-19:113.5-115.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.8 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.8”
Context: CB-04-19
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-19Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-19
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.2 m
- From
- 113.5 m
- To
- 115.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 113.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-19:113.5-115.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-19
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-19Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-19
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 120.4 m
- To
- 124.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-19:120.4-124.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 4.3 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.2”
Context: CB-04-19
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-19Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-19
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 120.4 m
- To
- 124.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-19:120.4-124.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-19
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-2Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-2
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.8 m
- From
- 151.1 m
- To
- 155.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 151.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-2:151.1-155.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.8 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 13.4 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.8 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.8”
Context: CB-04-2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-2Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-2
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.8 m
- From
- 151.1 m
- To
- 155.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 151.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-2:151.1-155.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-20Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-20
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.9 m
- From
- 138.9 m
- To
- 149.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 138.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-20:138.9-149.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.7 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 40.3 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.7 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.7”
Context: CB-04-20
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-20Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-20
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.9 m
- From
- 138.9 m
- To
- 149.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 138.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-20:138.9-149.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.6 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: CB-04-20
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-20Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-20
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.1 m
- From
- 154.8 m
- To
- 159.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 154.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-20:154.8-159.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.6 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 8.2 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.6 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: CB-04-20
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-20Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-20
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.1 m
- From
- 154.8 m
- To
- 159.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 154.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-20:154.8-159.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-20
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-21Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-21
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 174.8 m
- To
- 177.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 174.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-21:174.8-177.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -69 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 4.9 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.7 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: CB-04-21
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-21Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-21
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 174.8 m
- To
- 177.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 174.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-21:174.8-177.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -69 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-21
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-21Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-21
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 212.6 m
- To
- 213 m
- Intercept Depth
- 212.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-21:212.6-213
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -69 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.8 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.8 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.8”
Context: CB-04-21
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-21Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-21
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 212.6 m
- To
- 213 m
- Intercept Depth
- 212.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-21:212.6-213
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -69 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: CB-04-21
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-22Corner Bay · copperGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-22
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.4 m
- From
- 137 m
- To
- 141.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 137 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-22:137-141.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.5 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 19.8 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4.5 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.5”
Context: CB-04-22
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-22Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-22
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.4 m
- From
- 137 m
- To
- 141.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 137 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-22:137-141.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.6 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: CB-04-22
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-23Corner Bay · copperGrade: 4.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-23
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 199.4 m
- To
- 203.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 199.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-23:199.4-203.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.7 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 21.2 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4.7 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.7”
Context: CB-04-23
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-23Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-23
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 199.4 m
- To
- 203.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 199.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-23:199.4-203.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-04-23
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-24Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-24
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 131.6 m
- To
- 135 m
- Intercept Depth
- 131.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-24:131.6-135
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -49 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.9 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 13.3 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.9 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.9”
Context: CB-04-24
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-24Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-24
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 131.6 m
- To
- 135 m
- Intercept Depth
- 131.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-24:131.6-135
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -49 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-04-24
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-25Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-25
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 163.3 m
- To
- 166 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-25:163.3-166
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 8.1 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.0”
Context: CB-04-25
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-25Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-25
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 163.3 m
- To
- 166 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-25:163.3-166
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-25
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-26Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-26
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.9 m
- From
- 196.6 m
- To
- 203.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 196.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-26:196.6-203.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 15.2 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.2”
Context: CB-04-26
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-26Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-26
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.9 m
- From
- 196.6 m
- To
- 203.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 196.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-26:196.6-203.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-26
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-27Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-27
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 125 m
- To
- 128 m
- Intercept Depth
- 125 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-27:125-128
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.5 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 7.5 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.5 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.5”
Context: CB-04-27
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-27Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-27
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 125 m
- To
- 128 m
- Intercept Depth
- 125 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-27:125-128
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-27
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-28Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-28
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 143.9 m
- To
- 146.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 143.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-28:143.9-146.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.2 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.1”
Context: CB-04-28
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-28Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-28
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 143.9 m
- To
- 146.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 143.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-28:143.9-146.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-28
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-29Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-29
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- 165.8 m
- To
- 169.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 165.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-29:165.8-169.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.6 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.7”
Context: CB-04-29
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-29Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-29
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- 165.8 m
- To
- 169.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 165.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-29:165.8-169.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-29
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-3Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-3
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 171.5 m
- To
- 176.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 171.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-3:171.5-176.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.4 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 17.0 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.4 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.4”
Context: CB-04-3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-3Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-3
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 171.5 m
- To
- 176.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 171.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-3:171.5-176.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-04-3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-30Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-30
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 182.6 m
- To
- 185.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 182.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-30:182.6-185.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.2”
Context: CB-04-30
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-30Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-30
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 182.6 m
- To
- 185.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 182.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-30:182.6-185.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-04-30
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-31Corner Bay · copperGrade: 7.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-31
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.6 m
- From
- 195.4 m
- To
- 202 m
- Intercept Depth
- 195.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-31:195.4-202
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.5 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 49.5 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.5 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.5”
Context: CB-04-31
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-31Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-31
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.6 m
- From
- 195.4 m
- To
- 202 m
- Intercept Depth
- 195.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-31:195.4-202
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.5 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: CB-04-31
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-31Corner Bay · silverGrade: 14.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-31
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.6 m
- From
- 195.4 m
- To
- 202 m
- Intercept Depth
- 195.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-31:195.4-202
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 96.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 14.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“14.6”
Context: CB-04-31
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-32Corner Bay · copperGrade: 5.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-32
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 120.9 m
- To
- 123.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-32:120.9-123.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -51 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.3 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 14.3 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.3 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.3”
Context: CB-04-32
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-32Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-32
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 120.9 m
- To
- 123.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-32:120.9-123.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -51 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.6 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: CB-04-32
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-33Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-33
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 135.8 m
- To
- 139.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 135.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-33:135.8-139.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 5.3 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.4 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: CB-04-33
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-33Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-33
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 135.8 m
- To
- 139.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 135.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-33:135.8-139.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-04-33
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-34Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-34
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- From
- 154.1 m
- To
- 155.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 154.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-34:154.1-155.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.4 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.8”
Context: CB-04-34
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-34Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-34
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- From
- 154.1 m
- To
- 155.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 154.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-34:154.1-155.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-34
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-35Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-35
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 173.2 m
- To
- 176.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 173.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-35:173.2-176.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 4.1 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.4 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: CB-04-35
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-35Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-35
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 173.2 m
- To
- 176.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 173.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-35:173.2-176.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-35
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-36Corner Bay · copperGrade: 4.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-36
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 126.9 m
- To
- 130.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 126.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-36:126.9-130.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.3 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 14.2 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4.3 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.3”
Context: CB-04-36
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-36Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-36
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 126.9 m
- To
- 130.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 126.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-36:126.9-130.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-36
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-37Corner Bay · copperGrade: 5.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-37
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 140.2 m
- To
- 143.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 140.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-37:140.2-143.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -54 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.3 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 15.9 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.3 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.3”
Context: CB-04-37
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-37Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-37
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 140.2 m
- To
- 143.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 140.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-37:140.2-143.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -54 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.8 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.8”
Context: CB-04-37
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-38Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-38
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 166.8 m
- To
- 169.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 166.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-38:166.8-169.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.2 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.2”
Context: CB-04-38
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-38Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-38
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 166.8 m
- To
- 169.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 166.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-38:166.8-169.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-04-38
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-38Corner Bay · copperGrade: 4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-38
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.2 m
- From
- 170 m
- To
- 170.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 170 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-38:170-170.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.0”
Context: CB-04-38
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-38Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-38
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.2 m
- From
- 170 m
- To
- 170.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 170 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-38:170-170.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-38
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-38Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-38
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 170.7 m
- To
- 171.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 170.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-38:170.7-171.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-04-38
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-38Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-38
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 170.7 m
- To
- 171.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 170.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-38:170.7-171.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-04-38
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-39Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-39
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.8 m
- From
- 180.7 m
- To
- 186.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 180.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-39:180.7-186.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -73 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.9 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 16.8 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.9 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.9”
Context: CB-04-39
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-39Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-39
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.8 m
- From
- 180.7 m
- To
- 186.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 180.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-39:180.7-186.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -73 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.6 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: CB-04-39
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-39Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-39
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 188.5 m
- To
- 192.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 188.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-39:188.5-192.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -73 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.4 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 8.6 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.4 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.4”
Context: CB-04-39
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-39Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-39
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 188.5 m
- To
- 192.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 188.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-39:188.5-192.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -73 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-04-39
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-40Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-40
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- From
- 143 m
- To
- 144.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 143 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-40:143-144.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-40
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-40Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-40
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- From
- 143 m
- To
- 144.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 143 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-40:143-144.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-40
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-41Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-41
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 158.9 m
- To
- 161.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 158.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-41:158.9-161.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.2 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 9.0 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.2 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.2”
Context: CB-04-41
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-41Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-41
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 158.9 m
- To
- 161.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 158.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-41:158.9-161.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-41
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-42Corner Bay · copperGrade: 4.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-42
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.2 m
- From
- 190.9 m
- To
- 193.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 190.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-42:190.9-193.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.6 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 10.1 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4.6 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.6”
Context: CB-04-42
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-42Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-42
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.2 m
- From
- 190.9 m
- To
- 193.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 190.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-42:190.9-193.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-04-42
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-43Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-43
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- From
- 119.5 m
- To
- 121.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 119.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-43:119.5-121.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.8 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.2 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.8 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.8”
Context: CB-04-43
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-43Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-43
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- From
- 119.5 m
- To
- 121.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 119.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-43:119.5-121.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-43
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-43Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-43
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.8 m
- From
- 133 m
- To
- 139.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 133 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-43:133-139.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 11.6 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.7 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: CB-04-43
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-43Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-43
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.8 m
- From
- 133 m
- To
- 139.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 133 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-43:133-139.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-43
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-44Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-44
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 131 m
- To
- 134.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 131 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-44:131-134.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -54 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.9 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 9.9 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.9 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.9”
Context: CB-04-44
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-44Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-44
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 131 m
- To
- 134.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 131 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-44:131-134.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -54 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-44
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-44Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-44
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 145.6 m
- To
- 149.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 145.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-44:145.6-149.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -54 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 8.0 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: CB-04-44
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-44Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-44
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 145.6 m
- To
- 149.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 145.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-44:145.6-149.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -54 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-04-44
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-45Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-45
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- From
- 148.3 m
- To
- 152.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 148.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-45:148.3-152.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.5 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 15.0 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.5 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.5”
Context: CB-04-45
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-45Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-45
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- From
- 148.3 m
- To
- 152.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 148.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-45:148.3-152.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-45
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-45Corner Bay · silverGrade: 8.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-45
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- From
- 148.3 m
- To
- 152.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 148.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-45:148.3-152.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 36.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.5”
Context: CB-04-45
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-45Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-45
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 159.2 m
- To
- 162.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 159.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-45:159.2-162.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 4.3 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.3 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: CB-04-45
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-45Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-45
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 159.2 m
- To
- 162.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 159.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-45:159.2-162.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-45
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-46Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-46
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 166.7 m
- To
- 169.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 166.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-46:166.7-169.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 6.5 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: CB-04-46
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-46Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-46
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 166.7 m
- To
- 169.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 166.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-46:166.7-169.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-04-46
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-46Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-46
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.4 m
- From
- 172.9 m
- To
- 178.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 172.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-46:172.9-178.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 8.1 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.5 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: CB-04-46
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-46Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-46
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.4 m
- From
- 172.9 m
- To
- 178.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 172.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-46:172.9-178.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-46
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-47Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-47
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 190.1 m
- To
- 193.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 190.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-47:190.1-193.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -73 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 5.1 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.5 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: CB-04-47
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-47Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-47
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 190.1 m
- To
- 193.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 190.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-47:190.1-193.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -73 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-47
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-47Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-47
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 194.4 m
- To
- 197.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 194.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-47:194.4-197.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -73 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 4.5 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.4 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: CB-04-47
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-47Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-47
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 194.4 m
- To
- 197.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 194.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-47:194.4-197.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -73 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-47
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-48Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-48
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.8 m
- From
- 119 m
- To
- 123.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 119 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-48:119-123.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.6 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 12.5 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.6 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.6”
Context: CB-04-48
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-48Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-48
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.8 m
- From
- 119 m
- To
- 123.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 119 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-48:119-123.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.8 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.8”
Context: CB-04-48
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-48Corner Bay · copperGrade: 4.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-48
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.4 m
- From
- 126.6 m
- To
- 131 m
- Intercept Depth
- 126.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-48:126.6-131
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.9 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 21.6 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4.9 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.9”
Context: CB-04-48
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-48Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-48
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.4 m
- From
- 126.6 m
- To
- 131 m
- Intercept Depth
- 126.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-48:126.6-131
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-04-48
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-49Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-49
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 138.4 m
- To
- 141.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 138.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-49:138.4-141.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.6 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: CB-04-49
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-49Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-49
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 138.4 m
- To
- 141.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 138.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-49:138.4-141.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-49
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-49Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-49
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.2 m
- From
- 143.7 m
- To
- 145.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 143.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-49:143.7-145.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.2 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: CB-04-49
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-49Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-49
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.2 m
- From
- 143.7 m
- To
- 145.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 143.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-49:143.7-145.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-49
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-5Corner Bay · copperGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-5
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 146 m
- To
- 158 m
- Intercept Depth
- 146 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-5:146-158
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.5 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 54.0 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4.5 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.5”
Context: CB-04-5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-5Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-5
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 146 m
- To
- 158 m
- Intercept Depth
- 146 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-5:146-158
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-5Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-5
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 162.1 m
- To
- 163 m
- Intercept Depth
- 162.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-5:162.1-163
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.0 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.2”
Context: CB-04-5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-5Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-5
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 162.1 m
- To
- 163 m
- Intercept Depth
- 162.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-5:162.1-163
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-50Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-50
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.2 m
- From
- 153.9 m
- To
- 156 m
- Intercept Depth
- 153.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-50:153.9-156
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.1 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: CB-04-50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-50Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-50
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.2 m
- From
- 153.9 m
- To
- 156 m
- Intercept Depth
- 153.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-50:153.9-156
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-04-50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-52Corner Bay · copperGrade: 14.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-52
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 206.2 m
- To
- 210 m
- Intercept Depth
- 206.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-52:206.2-210
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -72 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 15.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.1 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 53.6 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 14.1 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“14.1”
Context: CB-04-52
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-52Corner Bay · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-52
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 206.2 m
- To
- 210 m
- Intercept Depth
- 206.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-52:206.2-210
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -72 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 15.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: CB-04-52
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-52Corner Bay · silverGrade: 40.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-52
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 40.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 206.2 m
- To
- 210 m
- Intercept Depth
- 206.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-52:206.2-210
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -72 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 15.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 40.4 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 153.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“40.4”
Context: CB-04-52
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-53Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-53
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 126.5 m
- To
- 128.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 126.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-53:126.5-128.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 4.4 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: CB-04-53
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-53Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-53
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 126.5 m
- To
- 128.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 126.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-53:126.5-128.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.6 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: CB-04-53
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-53Corner Bay · copperGrade: 5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-53
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 143 m
- To
- 146 m
- Intercept Depth
- 143 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-53:143-146
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 15.0 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.0”
Context: CB-04-53
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-53Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-53
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 143 m
- To
- 146 m
- Intercept Depth
- 143 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-53:143-146
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-53
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-54Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-54
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 148.9 m
- To
- 151.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 148.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-54:148.9-151.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.4 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 9.5 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.4 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.4”
Context: CB-04-54
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-54Corner Bay · goldGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-54
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 148.9 m
- To
- 151.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 148.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-54:148.9-151.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: CB-04-54
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-54Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-54
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 155.5 m
- To
- 158.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 155.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-54:155.5-158.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.4 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: CB-04-54
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-54Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-54
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 155.5 m
- To
- 158.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 155.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-54:155.5-158.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-04-54
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-55Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-55
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 200 m
- To
- 202.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 200 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-55:200-202.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -72 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.5 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.4 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: CB-04-55
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-55Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-55
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 200 m
- To
- 202.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 200 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-55:200-202.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -72 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-55
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-56Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-56
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 123.2 m
- To
- 126.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 123.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-56:123.2-126.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 7.6 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: CB-04-56
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-56Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-56
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 123.2 m
- To
- 126.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 123.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-56:123.2-126.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-56
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-56Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-56
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 138.3 m
- To
- 141.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 138.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-56:138.3-141.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.6 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 5.3 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.6 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: CB-04-56
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-56Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-56
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 138.3 m
- To
- 141.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 138.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-56:138.3-141.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-56
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-57Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-57
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.9 m
- From
- 158.8 m
- To
- 163.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 158.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-57:158.8-163.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.5 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 12.3 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.5 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.5”
Context: CB-04-57
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-57Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-57
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.9 m
- From
- 158.8 m
- To
- 163.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 158.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-57:158.8-163.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-57
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-57Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-57
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 168.9 m
- To
- 171.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 168.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-57:168.9-171.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 4.3 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.7 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: CB-04-57
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-57Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-57
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 168.9 m
- To
- 171.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 168.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-57:168.9-171.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-57
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-58Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-58
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.2 m
- From
- 129.3 m
- To
- 131.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 129.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-58:129.3-131.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.8 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 8.4 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.8 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.8”
Context: CB-04-58
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-58Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-58
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.2 m
- From
- 129.3 m
- To
- 131.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 129.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-58:129.3-131.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-58
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-59Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-59
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 131.3 m
- To
- 134.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 131.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-59:131.3-134.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 7.1 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: CB-04-59
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-59Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-59
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 131.3 m
- To
- 134.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 131.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-59:131.3-134.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-59
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-6Corner Bay · copperGrade: 5.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-6
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.2 m
- From
- 162.3 m
- To
- 169.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 162.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-6:162.3-169.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.2 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 37.4 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.2 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.2”
Context: CB-04-6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-6Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-6
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.2 m
- From
- 162.3 m
- To
- 169.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 162.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-6:162.3-169.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-6Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-6
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.2 m
- From
- 174.9 m
- To
- 181 m
- Intercept Depth
- 174.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-6:174.9-181
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.8 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 11.2 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.8 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.8”
Context: CB-04-6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-6Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-6
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.2 m
- From
- 174.9 m
- To
- 181 m
- Intercept Depth
- 174.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-6:174.9-181
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-60Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-60
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 138.7 m
- To
- 143.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 138.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-60:138.7-143.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -64 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 9.9 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: CB-04-60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-60Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-60
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 138.7 m
- To
- 143.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 138.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-60:138.7-143.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -64 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-60Corner Bay · silverGrade: 5.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-60
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 138.7 m
- To
- 143.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 138.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-60:138.7-143.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -64 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.2”
Context: CB-04-60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-61Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-61
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- 165.1 m
- To
- 168.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 165.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-61:165.1-168.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.5 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 9.3 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.5 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.5”
Context: CB-04-61
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-61Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-61
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- 165.1 m
- To
- 168.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 165.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-61:165.1-168.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-61
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-61Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-61
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 174.9 m
- To
- 177.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 174.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-61:174.9-177.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-61
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-61Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-61
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 174.9 m
- To
- 177.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 174.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-61:174.9-177.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-61
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-62Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-62
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 183.3 m
- To
- 185.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 183.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-62:183.3-185.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -74 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 6.0 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.0”
Context: CB-04-62
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-62Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-62
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 183.3 m
- To
- 185.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 183.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-62:183.3-185.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -74 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-62
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-63Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-63
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.2 m
- From
- 131.4 m
- To
- 133.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 131.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-63:131.4-133.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 6.6 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.0”
Context: CB-04-63
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-63Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-63
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.2 m
- From
- 131.4 m
- To
- 133.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 131.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-63:131.4-133.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.8 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.8”
Context: CB-04-63
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-63Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-63
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- From
- 139 m
- To
- 141.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 139 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-63:139-141.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 4.4 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.7 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: CB-04-63
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-63Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-63
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- From
- 139 m
- To
- 141.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 139 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-63:139-141.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-63
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-64Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-64
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 146 m
- To
- 147.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 146 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-64:146-147.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.7”
Context: CB-04-64
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-64Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-64
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 146 m
- To
- 147.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 146 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-64:146-147.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-04-64
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-64Corner Bay · copperGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-64
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.2 m
- From
- 155.9 m
- To
- 161 m
- Intercept Depth
- 155.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-64:155.9-161
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.5 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 23.4 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4.5 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.5”
Context: CB-04-64
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-64Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-64
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.2 m
- From
- 155.9 m
- To
- 161 m
- Intercept Depth
- 155.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-64:155.9-161
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.6 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: CB-04-64
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-64Corner Bay · silverGrade: 14.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-64
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.2 m
- From
- 155.9 m
- To
- 161 m
- Intercept Depth
- 155.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-64:155.9-161
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 74.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 14.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“14.3”
Context: CB-04-64
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-65Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-65
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- From
- 165.1 m
- To
- 169.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 165.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-65:165.1-169.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -66 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.5 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 15.0 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.5 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.5”
Context: CB-04-65
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-65Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-65
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- From
- 165.1 m
- To
- 169.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 165.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-65:165.1-169.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -66 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-04-65
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-65Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-65
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 173 m
- To
- 173.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 173 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-65:173-173.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -66 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: CB-04-65
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-65Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-65
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 173 m
- To
- 173.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 173 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-65:173-173.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -66 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: CB-04-65
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-66Corner Bay · copperGrade: 4.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-66
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 187 m
- To
- 189.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 187 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-66:187-189.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -73 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.2 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 12.2 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4.2 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.2”
Context: CB-04-66
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-66Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-66
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 187 m
- To
- 189.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 187 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-66:187-189.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -73 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.9 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.9”
Context: CB-04-66
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-66Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-66
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.9 m
- From
- 194.5 m
- To
- 199.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 194.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-66:194.5-199.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -73 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.7 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 13.2 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.7 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.7”
Context: CB-04-66
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-66Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-66
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.9 m
- From
- 194.5 m
- To
- 199.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 194.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-66:194.5-199.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -73 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.8 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.8”
Context: CB-04-66
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-67Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-67
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.3 m
- From
- 132.7 m
- To
- 139.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 132.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-67:132.7-139.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -47 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 5.8 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.8”
Context: CB-04-67
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-67Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-67
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.3 m
- From
- 132.7 m
- To
- 139.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 132.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-67:132.7-139.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -47 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-67
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-67Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-67
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- From
- 141.8 m
- To
- 146 m
- Intercept Depth
- 141.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-67:141.8-146
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -47 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 7.1 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.7 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: CB-04-67
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-67Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-67
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- From
- 141.8 m
- To
- 146 m
- Intercept Depth
- 141.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-67:141.8-146
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -47 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-67
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-68Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-68
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 162 m
- To
- 165.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 162 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-68:162-165.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -64 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.8 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 6.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.8 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.8”
Context: CB-04-68
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-68Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-68
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 162 m
- To
- 165.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 162 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-68:162-165.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -64 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-68
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-69Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-69
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 192.2 m
- To
- 195.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 192.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-69:192.2-195.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.6 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 5.6 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.6 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: CB-04-69
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-69Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-69
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 192.2 m
- To
- 195.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 192.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-69:192.2-195.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-69
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-7Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-7
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.1 m
- From
- 191.2 m
- To
- 195.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 191.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-7:191.2-195.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 9.0 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.2”
Context: CB-04-7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-7Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-7
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.1 m
- From
- 191.2 m
- To
- 195.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 191.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-7:191.2-195.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-7Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-7
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 204.7 m
- To
- 206.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 204.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-7:204.7-206.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.4 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.9”
Context: CB-04-7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-7Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-7
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 204.7 m
- To
- 206.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 204.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-7:204.7-206.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-04-7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-70Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-70
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 133.9 m
- To
- 135 m
- Intercept Depth
- 133.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-70:133.9-135
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.8 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.0 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.8 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.8”
Context: CB-04-70
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-70Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-70
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 133.9 m
- To
- 135 m
- Intercept Depth
- 133.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-70:133.9-135
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-04-70
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-70Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-70
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 138.3 m
- To
- 139.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 138.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-70:138.3-139.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.4 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.6 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.4 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.4”
Context: CB-04-70
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-70Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-70
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 138.3 m
- To
- 139.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 138.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-70:138.3-139.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-70
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-71Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-71
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- From
- 142.5 m
- To
- 144.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 142.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-71:142.5-144.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.1 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: CB-04-71
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-71Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-71
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- From
- 142.5 m
- To
- 144.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 142.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-71:142.5-144.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-71
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-71Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-71
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 154.6 m
- To
- 159.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 154.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-71:154.6-159.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 6.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.5 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: CB-04-71
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-71Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-71
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 154.6 m
- To
- 159.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 154.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-71:154.6-159.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-04-71
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-73Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-73
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 110.9 m
- To
- 113.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 110.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-73:110.9-113.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 6.2 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.2”
Context: CB-04-73
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-73Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-73
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 110.9 m
- To
- 113.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 110.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-73:110.9-113.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.5 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: CB-04-73
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-74Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-74
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.8 m
- From
- 118.4 m
- To
- 124.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 118.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-74:118.4-124.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 12.2 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: CB-04-74
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-74Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-74
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.8 m
- From
- 118.4 m
- To
- 124.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 118.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-74:118.4-124.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-74
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-74Corner Bay · silverGrade: 6.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-74
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.8 m
- From
- 118.4 m
- To
- 124.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 118.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-74:118.4-124.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 38.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.7”
Context: CB-04-74
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-74Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-74
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 131 m
- To
- 133.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 131 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-74:131-133.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.4 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: CB-04-74
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-74Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-74
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 131 m
- To
- 133.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 131 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-74:131-133.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-74
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-74Corner Bay · silverGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-74
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 131 m
- To
- 133.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 131 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-74:131-133.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.7”
Context: CB-04-74
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-75Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-75
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
- From
- 128 m
- To
- 131.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 128 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-75:128-131.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.9 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 7.4 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.9 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.9”
Context: CB-04-75
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-75Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-75
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
- From
- 128 m
- To
- 131.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 128 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-75:128-131.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-75
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-76Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-76
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.2 m
- From
- 162.9 m
- To
- 169.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 162.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-76:162.9-169.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -71 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.4 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 14.9 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.4 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.4”
Context: CB-04-76
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-76Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-76
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.2 m
- From
- 162.9 m
- To
- 169.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 162.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-76:162.9-169.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -71 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-76
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-76Corner Bay · silverGrade: 4.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-76
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.2 m
- From
- 162.9 m
- To
- 169.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 162.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-76:162.9-169.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -71 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 25.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.1”
Context: CB-04-76
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-77Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-77
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 137 m
- To
- 140 m
- Intercept Depth
- 137 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-77:137-140
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -49 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.3 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.1”
Context: CB-04-77
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-77Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-77
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 137 m
- To
- 140 m
- Intercept Depth
- 137 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-77:137-140
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -49 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-77
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-78Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-78
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 155.3 m
- To
- 158.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 155.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-78:155.3-158.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -64 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.8 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 9.2 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.8 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.8”
Context: CB-04-78
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-78Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-78
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 155.3 m
- To
- 158.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 155.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-78:155.3-158.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -64 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-78
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-78Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-78
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 162.8 m
- To
- 166.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 162.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-78:162.8-166.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -64 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 4.0 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: CB-04-78
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-78Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-78
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 162.8 m
- To
- 166.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 162.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-78:162.8-166.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -64 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-04-78
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-79Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-79
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- 194.5 m
- To
- 198.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 194.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-79:194.5-198.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.1 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 11.5 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.1 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.1”
Context: CB-04-79
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-79Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-79
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- 194.5 m
- To
- 198.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 194.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-79:194.5-198.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.5 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: CB-04-79
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-79Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-79
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 205 m
- To
- 207.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 205 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-79:205-207.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.1 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: CB-04-79
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-79Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-79
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 205 m
- To
- 207.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 205 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-79:205-207.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-79
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-8Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-8
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- From
- 220 m
- To
- 222.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 220 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-8:220-222.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -69 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 5.5 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: CB-04-8
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-8Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-8
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- From
- 220 m
- To
- 222.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 220 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-8:220-222.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -69 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.6 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: CB-04-8
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-8Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-8
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- From
- 234.9 m
- To
- 239.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 234.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-8:234.9-239.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -69 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.4 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.8”
Context: CB-04-8
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-8Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-8
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- From
- 234.9 m
- To
- 239.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 234.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-8:234.9-239.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -69 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.9 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.9”
Context: CB-04-8
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-80Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-80
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 77.4 m
- To
- 81 m
- Intercept Depth
- 77.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-80:77.4-81
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 6.1 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.7 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: CB-04-80
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-80Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-80
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 77.4 m
- To
- 81 m
- Intercept Depth
- 77.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-80:77.4-81
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.6 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: CB-04-80
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-81Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-81
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 104.2 m
- To
- 105.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 104.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-81:104.2-105.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: CB-04-81
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-81Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-81
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 104.2 m
- To
- 105.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 104.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-81:104.2-105.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-81
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-81Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-81
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.2 m
- From
- 109.1 m
- To
- 114.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 109.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-81:109.1-114.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.9 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 9.9 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.9 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.9”
Context: CB-04-81
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-81Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-81
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.2 m
- From
- 109.1 m
- To
- 114.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 109.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-81:109.1-114.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-81
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-82Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-82
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 58 m
- To
- 60 m
- Intercept Depth
- 58 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-82:58-60
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 94 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.6 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.3 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: CB-04-82
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-82Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-82
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 58 m
- To
- 60 m
- Intercept Depth
- 58 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-82:58-60
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 94 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-82
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-82Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-82
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.1 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 76.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-82:72-76.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 94 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 5.7 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.4 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: CB-04-82
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-82Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-82
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.1 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 76.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-82:72-76.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 94 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-82
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-83Corner Bay · copperGrade: 5.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-83
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- From
- 72.2 m
- To
- 74 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-83:72.2-74
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.8 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 10.4 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.8 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.8”
Context: CB-04-83
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-83Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-83
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- From
- 72.2 m
- To
- 74 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-83:72.2-74
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-04-83
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-84Corner Bay · copperGrade: 5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-84
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 97.1 m
- To
- 100.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 97.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-84:97.1-100.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 16.5 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.0”
Context: CB-04-84
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-84Corner Bay · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-84
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 97.1 m
- To
- 100.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 97.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-84:97.1-100.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: CB-04-84
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-84Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-84
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 112.4 m
- To
- 115.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 112.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-84:112.4-115.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.9 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.4 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: CB-04-84
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-84Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-84
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 112.4 m
- To
- 115.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 112.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-84:112.4-115.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-84
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-85Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-85
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 74.2 m
- To
- 78 m
- Intercept Depth
- 74.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-85:74.2-78
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.3 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: CB-04-85
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-85Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-85
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 74.2 m
- To
- 78 m
- Intercept Depth
- 74.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-85:74.2-78
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-04-85
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-86Corner Bay · copperGrade: 6.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-86
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 66.6 m
- To
- 69.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 66.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-86:66.6-69.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.2 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 20.5 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 6.2 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.2”
Context: CB-04-86
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-86Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-86
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 66.6 m
- To
- 69.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 66.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-86:66.6-69.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.6 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: CB-04-86
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-86Corner Bay · silverGrade: 20.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-86
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 20.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 66.6 m
- To
- 69.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 66.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-86:66.6-69.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 66.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 20.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“20.2”
Context: CB-04-86
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-9Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 26.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-9
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 26.3 m
- From
- 125.4 m
- To
- 151.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 125.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-9:125.4-151.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.7 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 97.3 %·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.7 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.7”
Context: CB-04-9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-04-9Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-04-9
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 26.3 m
- From
- 125.4 m
- To
- 151.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 125.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-04-9:125.4-151.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-04-9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-87Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-87
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 88.7 m
- To
- 92.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 88.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-87:88.7-92.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 7.9 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.2”
Context: CB-05-87
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-87Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-87
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 88.7 m
- To
- 92.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 88.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-87:88.7-92.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-05-87
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-87Corner Bay · silverGrade: 6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-87
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 88.7 m
- To
- 92.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 88.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-87:88.7-92.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 21.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.0”
Context: CB-05-87
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-88Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-88
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 98.2 m
- To
- 101.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-88:98.2-101.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.6 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 11.5 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.6 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.6”
Context: CB-05-88
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-88Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-88
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 98.2 m
- To
- 101.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-88:98.2-101.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-05-88
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-88Corner Bay · silverGrade: 11.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-88
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 98.2 m
- To
- 101.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-88:98.2-101.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 35.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 11.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.2”
Context: CB-05-88
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-88Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-88
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 103.7 m
- To
- 107 m
- Intercept Depth
- 103.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-88:103.7-107
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.3 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-05-88
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-88Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-88
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 103.7 m
- To
- 107 m
- Intercept Depth
- 103.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-88:103.7-107
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-05-88
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-88Corner Bay · silverGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-88
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 103.7 m
- To
- 107 m
- Intercept Depth
- 103.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-88:103.7-107
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.1”
Context: CB-05-88
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-89Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-89
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- From
- 155.3 m
- To
- 159.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 155.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-89:155.3-159.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.3 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 9.9 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.3 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.3”
Context: CB-05-89
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-89Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-89
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- From
- 155.3 m
- To
- 159.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 155.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-89:155.3-159.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-05-89
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-89Corner Bay · silverGrade: 4.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-89
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- From
- 155.3 m
- To
- 159.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 155.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-89:155.3-159.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 19.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.6”
Context: CB-05-89
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-89Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-89
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 170.4 m
- To
- 173.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 170.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-89:170.4-173.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.2 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.7”
Context: CB-05-89
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-89Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-89
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 170.4 m
- To
- 173.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 170.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-89:170.4-173.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-05-89
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-89Corner Bay · silverGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-89
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 170.4 m
- To
- 173.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 170.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-89:170.4-173.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: CB-05-89
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-90Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-90
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 104.5 m
- To
- 107.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 104.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-90:104.5-107.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.2 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-05-90
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-90Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-90
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 104.5 m
- To
- 107.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 104.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-90:104.5-107.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-05-90
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-90Corner Bay · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-90
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 104.5 m
- To
- 107.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 104.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-90:104.5-107.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: CB-05-90
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-90Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-90
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 119.5 m
- To
- 122.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 119.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-90:119.5-122.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.9 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-05-90
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-90Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-90
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 119.5 m
- To
- 122.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 119.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-90:119.5-122.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-05-90
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-90Corner Bay · silverGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-90
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 119.5 m
- To
- 122.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 119.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-90:119.5-122.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-05-90
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-91Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-91
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 17.4 m
- From
- 846.5 m
- To
- 863.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 846.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-91:846.5-863.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -57 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 38.3 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.2”
Context: CB-05-91
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-91Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-91
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17.4 m
- From
- 846.5 m
- To
- 863.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 846.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-91:846.5-863.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -57 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-05-91
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-91Corner Bay · silverGrade: 5.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-91
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17.4 m
- From
- 846.5 m
- To
- 863.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 846.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-91:846.5-863.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -57 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 97.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.6”
Context: CB-05-91
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-92Corner Bay · copperGrade: 7.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 20.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-92
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 20.3 m
- From
- 1429.6 m
- To
- 1449.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1429.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-92:1429.6-1449.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 8.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.6 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 154.3 %·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.6 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.6”
Context: CB-05-92
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-92Corner Bay · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-92
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20.3 m
- From
- 1429.6 m
- To
- 1449.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1429.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-92:1429.6-1449.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 8.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 20.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: CB-05-92
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-92Corner Bay · silverGrade: 16.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-92
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20.3 m
- From
- 1429.6 m
- To
- 1449.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1429.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-92:1429.6-1449.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 8.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.9 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 343.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.9”
Context: CB-05-92
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-93Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-93
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12.1 m
- From
- 950.2 m
- To
- 962.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 950.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-93:950.2-962.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.2 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 38.7 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.2 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.2”
Context: CB-05-93
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-93Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-93
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.1 m
- From
- 950.2 m
- To
- 962.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 950.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-93:950.2-962.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-05-93
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-93Corner Bay · silverGrade: 15.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-93
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.1 m
- From
- 950.2 m
- To
- 962.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 950.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-93:950.2-962.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 191.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 15.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.8”
Context: CB-05-93
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-94Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-94
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.9 m
- From
- 897.1 m
- To
- 902 m
- Intercept Depth
- 897.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-94:897.1-902
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.6 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 7.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.6 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: CB-05-94
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-94Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-94
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.9 m
- From
- 897.1 m
- To
- 902 m
- Intercept Depth
- 897.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-94:897.1-902
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-05-94
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-94Corner Bay · silverGrade: 10.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-94
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.9 m
- From
- 897.1 m
- To
- 902 m
- Intercept Depth
- 897.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-94:897.1-902
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 53.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 10.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.9”
Context: CB-05-94
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-95Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-95
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.2 m
- From
- 1152.2 m
- To
- 1160.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1152.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-95:1152.2-1160.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -54 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 16.4 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: CB-05-95
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-95Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-95
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.2 m
- From
- 1152.2 m
- To
- 1160.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1152.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-95:1152.2-1160.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -54 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-05-95
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-95Corner Bay · silverGrade: 4.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-95
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.2 m
- From
- 1152.2 m
- To
- 1160.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1152.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-95:1152.2-1160.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -54 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 34.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.2”
Context: CB-05-95
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-96Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-96
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.9 m
- From
- 1006.7 m
- To
- 1011.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1006.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-96:1006.7-1011.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 276 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 4.9 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: CB-05-96
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-96Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-96
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.9 m
- From
- 1006.7 m
- To
- 1011.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1006.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-96:1006.7-1011.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 276 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-05-96
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-96Corner Bay · silverGrade: 4.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-96
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.9 m
- From
- 1006.7 m
- To
- 1011.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1006.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-96:1006.7-1011.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 276 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 23.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.7”
Context: CB-05-96
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-97Corner Bay · copperGrade: 5.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-97
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.8 m
- From
- 746 m
- To
- 751.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 746 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-97:746-751.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.1 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 29.6 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.1 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.1”
Context: CB-05-97
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-97Corner Bay · goldGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-97
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.8 m
- From
- 746 m
- To
- 751.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 746 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-97:746-751.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.2”
Context: CB-05-97
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-97Corner Bay · silverGrade: 36.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-97
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 36.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.8 m
- From
- 746 m
- To
- 751.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 746 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-97:746-751.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 36.2 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 210.0 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“36.2”
Context: CB-05-97
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-97Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-97
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 916.2 m
- To
- 919.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 916.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-97:916.2-919.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.1 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: CB-05-97
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-97Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-97
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 916.2 m
- To
- 919.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 916.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-97:916.2-919.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-05-97
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-05-97Corner Bay · silverGrade: 6.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-05-97
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 916.2 m
- To
- 919.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 916.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-05-97:916.2-919.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 19.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.4”
Context: CB-05-97
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-123Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-123
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 353.4 m
- To
- 356.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 353.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-123:353.4-356.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.9 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: CB-08-123
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-123Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-123
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 353.4 m
- To
- 356.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 353.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-123:353.4-356.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-08-123
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-123Corner Bay · silverGrade: 9.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-123
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 353.4 m
- To
- 356.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 353.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-123:353.4-356.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 29.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.4”
Context: CB-08-123
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-123Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-123
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 401 m
- To
- 403.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 401 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-123:401-403.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.6 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.9”
Context: CB-08-123
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-123Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-123
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 401 m
- To
- 403.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 401 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-123:401-403.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-08-123
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-123Corner Bay · silverGrade: 4.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-123
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 401 m
- To
- 403.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 401 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-123:401-403.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.1”
Context: CB-08-123
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-124Corner Bay · copperGrade: 4.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-124
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 309 m
- To
- 311.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 309 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-124:309-311.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -57 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.3 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 12.5 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4.3 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.3”
Context: CB-08-124
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-124Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-124
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 309 m
- To
- 311.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 309 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-124:309-311.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -57 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.7 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.7”
Context: CB-08-124
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-124Corner Bay · silverGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-124
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 309 m
- To
- 311.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 309 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-124:309-311.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -57 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.4”
Context: CB-08-124
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-124Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-124
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 334.1 m
- To
- 338.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 334.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-124:334.1-338.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -57 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.7 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 12.7 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.7 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.7”
Context: CB-08-124
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-124Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-124
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 334.1 m
- To
- 338.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 334.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-124:334.1-338.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -57 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-08-124
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-124Corner Bay · silverGrade: 5.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-124
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 334.1 m
- To
- 338.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 334.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-124:334.1-338.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -57 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.2”
Context: CB-08-124
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-125Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-125
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 339.9 m
- To
- 343 m
- Intercept Depth
- 339.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-125:339.9-343
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.6 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: CB-08-125
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-125Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-125
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 339.9 m
- To
- 343 m
- Intercept Depth
- 339.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-125:339.9-343
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-08-125
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-125Corner Bay · silverGrade: 5.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-125
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 339.9 m
- To
- 343 m
- Intercept Depth
- 339.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-125:339.9-343
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 15.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.1”
Context: CB-08-125
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-127Corner Bay · copperGrade: 5.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-127
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.1 m
- From
- 306.2 m
- To
- 310.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 306.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-127:306.2-310.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.4 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 22.1 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.4 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.4”
Context: CB-08-127
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-127Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-127
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.1 m
- From
- 306.2 m
- To
- 310.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 306.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-127:306.2-310.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-08-127
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-127Corner Bay · silverGrade: 9.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-127
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.1 m
- From
- 306.2 m
- To
- 310.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 306.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-127:306.2-310.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 37.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.1”
Context: CB-08-127
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-128Corner Bay · copperGrade: 9.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-128
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 329.2 m
- To
- 333.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 329.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-128:329.2-333.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 9.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.1 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 42.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 9.1 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.1”
Context: CB-08-128
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-128Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-128
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 329.2 m
- To
- 333.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 329.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-128:329.2-333.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 9.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.6 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: CB-08-128
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-128Corner Bay · silverGrade: 16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-128
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 329.2 m
- To
- 333.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 329.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-128:329.2-333.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 9.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 75.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 16 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.0”
Context: CB-08-128
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-128Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-128
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 339.8 m
- To
- 341.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 339.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-128:339.8-341.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-08-128
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-128Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-128
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 339.8 m
- To
- 341.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 339.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-128:339.8-341.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-08-128
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-128Corner Bay · silverGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-128
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 339.8 m
- To
- 341.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 339.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-128:339.8-341.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.9”
Context: CB-08-128
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-129Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-129
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 341.1 m
- To
- 342.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 341.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-129:341.1-342.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -61 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.9 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.8”
Context: CB-08-129
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-129Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-129
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 341.1 m
- To
- 342.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 341.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-129:341.1-342.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -61 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-08-129
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-129Corner Bay · silverGrade: 5.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-129
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 341.1 m
- To
- 342.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 341.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-129:341.1-342.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -61 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.6”
Context: CB-08-129
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-129Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-129
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 367.4 m
- To
- 370.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 367.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-129:367.4-370.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -61 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.6 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 5.0 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.6 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: CB-08-129
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-129Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-129
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 367.4 m
- To
- 370.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 367.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-129:367.4-370.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -61 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-08-129
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-129Corner Bay · silverGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-129
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 367.4 m
- To
- 370.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 367.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-129:367.4-370.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -61 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.7”
Context: CB-08-129
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-130Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-130
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 348.2 m
- To
- 351.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 348.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-130:348.2-351.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.4 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: CB-08-130
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-130Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-130
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 348.2 m
- To
- 351.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 348.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-130:348.2-351.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-08-130
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-130Corner Bay · silverGrade: 4.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-130
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 348.2 m
- To
- 351.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 348.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-130:348.2-351.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.2”
Context: CB-08-130
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-142Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-142
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- 287.7 m
- To
- 291.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 287.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-142:287.7-291.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.6 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.7”
Context: CB-08-142
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-142Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-142
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- 287.7 m
- To
- 291.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 287.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-142:287.7-291.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-08-142
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-142Corner Bay · silverGrade: 2.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-142
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- 287.7 m
- To
- 291.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 287.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-142:287.7-291.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.9”
Context: CB-08-142
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-143Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-143
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 306.1 m
- To
- 309.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 306.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-143:306.1-309.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-08-143
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-143Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-143
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 306.1 m
- To
- 309.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 306.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-143:306.1-309.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-08-143
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-143Corner Bay · silverGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-143
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 306.1 m
- To
- 309.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 306.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-143:306.1-309.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: CB-08-143
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-144Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-144
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 324.6 m
- To
- 327.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 324.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-144:324.6-327.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -61 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.6 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.3 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: CB-08-144
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-144Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-144
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 324.6 m
- To
- 327.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 324.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-144:324.6-327.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -61 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-08-144
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-144Corner Bay · silverGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-144
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 324.6 m
- To
- 327.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 324.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-144:324.6-327.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -61 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 14.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.0”
Context: CB-08-144
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-150Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-150
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.9 m
- From
- 261 m
- To
- 265.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 261 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-150:261-265.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 6.9 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.4 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: CB-08-150
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-150Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-150
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.9 m
- From
- 261 m
- To
- 265.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 261 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-150:261-265.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-08-150
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-150Corner Bay · silverGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-150
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.9 m
- From
- 261 m
- To
- 265.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 261 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-150:261-265.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 18.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.7”
Context: CB-08-150
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-151Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-151
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- From
- 286.2 m
- To
- 290.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 286.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-151:286.2-290.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.4 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 10.3 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.4 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.4”
Context: CB-08-151
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-151Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-151
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- From
- 286.2 m
- To
- 290.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 286.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-151:286.2-290.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-08-151
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-151Corner Bay · silverGrade: 6.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-151
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- From
- 286.2 m
- To
- 290.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 286.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-151:286.2-290.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 29.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.9”
Context: CB-08-151
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-152Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-152
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 317.8 m
- To
- 321.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 317.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-152:317.8-321.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.0 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: CB-08-152
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-152Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-152
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 317.8 m
- To
- 321.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 317.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-152:317.8-321.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-08-152
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-152Corner Bay · silverGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-152
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 317.8 m
- To
- 321.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 317.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-152:317.8-321.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.2”
Context: CB-08-152
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-153Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-153
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 359.5 m
- To
- 362.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 359.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-153:359.5-362.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.6 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: CB-08-153
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-153Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-153
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 359.5 m
- To
- 362.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 359.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-153:359.5-362.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: CB-08-153
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-08-153Corner Bay · silverGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-08-153
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 359.5 m
- To
- 362.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 359.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-08-153:359.5-362.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.8”
Context: CB-08-153
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-17-01Corner Bay · copperGrade: 6.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-17-01
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 1357.2 m
- To
- 1359.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1357.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-17-01:1357.2-1359.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 102 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.3 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 15.8 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 6.3 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.3”
Context: CB-17-01
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-17-01Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-17-01
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 1357.2 m
- To
- 1359.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1357.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-17-01:1357.2-1359.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 102 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-17-01
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-17-01Corner Bay · silverGrade: 9.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-17-01
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 1357.2 m
- To
- 1359.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1357.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-17-01:1357.2-1359.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 102 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.6”
Context: CB-17-01
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-17-01W3Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-17-01W3
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 1414.7 m
- To
- 1417.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1414.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-17-01W3:1414.7-1417.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 102 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.2 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 10.2 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.2 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.2”
Context: CB-17-01W3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-17-01W3Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-17-01W3
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 1414.7 m
- To
- 1417.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1414.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-17-01W3:1414.7-1417.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 102 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-17-01W3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-17-01W3Corner Bay · silverGrade: 7.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-17-01W3
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 1414.7 m
- To
- 1417.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1414.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-17-01W3:1414.7-1417.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 102 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 23.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.2”
Context: CB-17-01W3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-17-03W3Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-17-03W3
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 1285.2 m
- To
- 1288.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1285.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-17-03W3:1285.2-1288.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 102 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.3 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.1”
Context: CB-17-03W3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-17-03W3Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-17-03W3
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 1285.2 m
- To
- 1288.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1285.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-17-03W3:1285.2-1288.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 102 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-17-03W3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-17-03W3Corner Bay · silverGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-17-03W3
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 1285.2 m
- To
- 1288.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1285.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-17-03W3:1285.2-1288.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 102 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: CB-17-03W3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-17-04ACorner Bay · copperGrade: 6.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-17-04A
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 1426.2 m
- To
- 1429.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1426.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-17-04A:1426.2-1429.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 123 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.3 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 20.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 6.3 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.3”
Context: CB-17-04A
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-17-04ACorner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-17-04A
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 1426.2 m
- To
- 1429.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1426.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-17-04A:1426.2-1429.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 123 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-17-04A
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-17-04ACorner Bay · silverGrade: 9.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-17-04A
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 1426.2 m
- To
- 1429.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1426.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-17-04A:1426.2-1429.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 123 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 31.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.5”
Context: CB-17-04A
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-18-02W2Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-18-02W2
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.7 m
- From
- 924.1 m
- To
- 929.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 924.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-18-02W2:924.1-929.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 115 °
- Dip
- -73 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.4 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 19.4 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.4 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.4”
Context: CB-18-02W2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-18-02W2Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-18-02W2
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.7 m
- From
- 924.1 m
- To
- 929.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 924.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-18-02W2:924.1-929.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 115 °
- Dip
- -73 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-18-02W2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-18-02W2Corner Bay · silverGrade: 6.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-18-02W2
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.7 m
- From
- 924.1 m
- To
- 929.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 924.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-18-02W2:924.1-929.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 115 °
- Dip
- -73 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 39.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.9”
Context: CB-18-02W2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-18-03Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-18-03
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 850 m
- To
- 856 m
- Intercept Depth
- 850 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-18-03:850-856
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 121 °
- Dip
- -72 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.5 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 15.0 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.5 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.5”
Context: CB-18-03
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-18-03Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-18-03
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 850 m
- To
- 856 m
- Intercept Depth
- 850 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-18-03:850-856
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 121 °
- Dip
- -72 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-18-03
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-18-03Corner Bay · silverGrade: 8.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-18-03
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 850 m
- To
- 856 m
- Intercept Depth
- 850 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-18-03:850-856
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 121 °
- Dip
- -72 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 49.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.3”
Context: CB-18-03
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-18-03W4Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-18-03W4
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 840 m
- To
- 845 m
- Intercept Depth
- 840 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-18-03W4:840-845
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 121 °
- Dip
- -72 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 8.5 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.7 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: CB-18-03W4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-18-03W4Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-18-03W4
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 840 m
- To
- 845 m
- Intercept Depth
- 840 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-18-03W4:840-845
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 121 °
- Dip
- -72 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-18-03W4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-18-03W4Corner Bay · silverGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-18-03W4
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 840 m
- To
- 845 m
- Intercept Depth
- 840 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-18-03W4:840-845
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 121 °
- Dip
- -72 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 18.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.7”
Context: CB-18-03W4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-18-04Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-18-04
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.6 m
- From
- 802.9 m
- To
- 808.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 802.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-18-04:802.9-808.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 121 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.5 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 14.0 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.5 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.5”
Context: CB-18-04
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-18-04Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-18-04
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.6 m
- From
- 802.9 m
- To
- 808.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 802.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-18-04:802.9-808.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 121 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-18-04
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-18-04Corner Bay · silverGrade: 12.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-18-04
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.6 m
- From
- 802.9 m
- To
- 808.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 802.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-18-04:802.9-808.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 121 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 71.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 12.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.8”
Context: CB-18-04
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-18-05Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-18-05
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 17 m
- From
- 1013.8 m
- To
- 1030.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1013.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-18-05:1013.8-1030.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 126 °
- Dip
- -76 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.5 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 42.5 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.5 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.5”
Context: CB-18-05
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-18-05Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-18-05
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17 m
- From
- 1013.8 m
- To
- 1030.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1013.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-18-05:1013.8-1030.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 126 °
- Dip
- -76 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-18-05
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-18-05Corner Bay · silverGrade: 5.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-18-05
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17 m
- From
- 1013.8 m
- To
- 1030.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1013.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-18-05:1013.8-1030.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 126 °
- Dip
- -76 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 95.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.6”
Context: CB-18-05
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-18-06Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-18-06
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15.3 m
- From
- 946.5 m
- To
- 961.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 946.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-18-06:946.5-961.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 126 °
- Dip
- -75 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 30.6 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: CB-18-06
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-18-06Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-18-06
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.3 m
- From
- 946.5 m
- To
- 961.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 946.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-18-06:946.5-961.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 126 °
- Dip
- -75 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-18-06
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-18-06Corner Bay · silverGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-18-06
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.3 m
- From
- 946.5 m
- To
- 961.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 946.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-18-06:946.5-961.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 126 °
- Dip
- -75 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 68.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.5”
Context: CB-18-06
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-18-07Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-18-07
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 14.7 m
- From
- 851.7 m
- To
- 866.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 851.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-18-07:851.7-866.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 126 °
- Dip
- -73 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.2 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 47.0 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.2 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.2”
Context: CB-18-07
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-18-07Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-18-07
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.7 m
- From
- 851.7 m
- To
- 866.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 851.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-18-07:851.7-866.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 126 °
- Dip
- -73 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-18-07
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-18-07Corner Bay · silverGrade: 11.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-18-07
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.7 m
- From
- 851.7 m
- To
- 866.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 851.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-18-07:851.7-866.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 126 °
- Dip
- -73 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 166.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 11.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.3”
Context: CB-18-07
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-19-08Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-19-08
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 629.4 m
- To
- 632.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 629.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-19-08:629.4-632.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.2”
Context: CB-19-08
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-19-08Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-19-08
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 629.4 m
- To
- 632.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 629.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-19-08:629.4-632.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-19-08
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-19-08Corner Bay · silverGrade: 13.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-19-08
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 629.4 m
- To
- 632.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 629.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-19-08:629.4-632.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 43.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 13.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.6”
Context: CB-19-08
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-19-08Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-19-08
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 899.3 m
- To
- 902.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 899.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-19-08:899.3-902.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 4.3 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.5 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: CB-19-08
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-19-08Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-19-08
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 899.3 m
- To
- 902.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 899.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-19-08:899.3-902.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-19-08
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-19-08Corner Bay · silverGrade: 7.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-19-08
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 899.3 m
- To
- 902.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 899.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-19-08:899.3-902.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 21.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.3”
Context: CB-19-08
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-19-11Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-19-11
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 756.3 m
- To
- 761 m
- Intercept Depth
- 756.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-19-11:756.3-761
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 4.2 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.9”
Context: CB-19-11
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-19-11Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-19-11
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 756.3 m
- To
- 761 m
- Intercept Depth
- 756.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-19-11:756.3-761
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-19-11
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-19-11Corner Bay · silverGrade: 7.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-19-11
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 756.3 m
- To
- 761 m
- Intercept Depth
- 756.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-19-11:756.3-761
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 37.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.9”
Context: CB-19-11
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-20-12Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-20-12
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.9 m
- From
- 848 m
- To
- 852.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 848 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-20-12:848-852.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 86 °
- Dip
- -52 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.6 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 7.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.6 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: CB-20-12
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-20-12Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-20-12
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.9 m
- From
- 848 m
- To
- 852.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 848 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-20-12:848-852.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 86 °
- Dip
- -52 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-20-12
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-20-12Corner Bay · silverGrade: 9.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-20-12
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.9 m
- From
- 848 m
- To
- 852.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 848 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-20-12:848-852.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 86 °
- Dip
- -52 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 45.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.3”
Context: CB-20-12
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-20-13Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-20-13
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.4 m
- From
- 904.7 m
- To
- 910.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 904.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-20-13:904.7-910.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 6.5 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.2”
Context: CB-20-13
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-20-13Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-20-13
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.4 m
- From
- 904.7 m
- To
- 910.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 904.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-20-13:904.7-910.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-20-13
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-20-13Corner Bay · silverGrade: 6.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-20-13
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.4 m
- From
- 904.7 m
- To
- 910.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 904.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-20-13:904.7-910.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 36.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.7”
Context: CB-20-13
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-20-15Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-20-15
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.4 m
- From
- 1066.2 m
- To
- 1075.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1066.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-20-15:1066.2-1075.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 77 °
- Dip
- -66 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 19.7 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: CB-20-15
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-20-15Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-20-15
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.4 m
- From
- 1066.2 m
- To
- 1075.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1066.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-20-15:1066.2-1075.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 77 °
- Dip
- -66 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-20-15
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-20-15Corner Bay · silverGrade: 3.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-20-15
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.4 m
- From
- 1066.2 m
- To
- 1075.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1066.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-20-15:1066.2-1075.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 77 °
- Dip
- -66 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 31.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.3”
Context: CB-20-15
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-20-16Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-20-16
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.7 m
- From
- 1187.5 m
- To
- 1195.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1187.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-20-16:1187.5-1195.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.4 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 18.5 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.4 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.4”
Context: CB-20-16
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-20-16Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-20-16
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.7 m
- From
- 1187.5 m
- To
- 1195.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1187.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-20-16:1187.5-1195.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.6 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: CB-20-16
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-20-16Corner Bay · silverGrade: 4.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-20-16
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.7 m
- From
- 1187.5 m
- To
- 1195.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1187.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-20-16:1187.5-1195.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 37.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.8”
Context: CB-20-16
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-20-16W1Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-20-16W1
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.8 m
- From
- 1150.5 m
- To
- 1158.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1150.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-20-16W1:1150.5-1158.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 87 °
- Dip
- -71 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 9.4 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.2”
Context: CB-20-16W1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-20-16W1Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-20-16W1
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.8 m
- From
- 1150.5 m
- To
- 1158.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1150.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-20-16W1:1150.5-1158.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 87 °
- Dip
- -71 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-20-16W1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-20-16W1Corner Bay · silverGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-20-16W1
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.8 m
- From
- 1150.5 m
- To
- 1158.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1150.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-20-16W1:1150.5-1158.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 87 °
- Dip
- -71 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 17.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.2”
Context: CB-20-16W1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-20-17Corner Bay · copperGrade: 6.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-20-17
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 971 m
- To
- 981 m
- Intercept Depth
- 971 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-20-17:971-981
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 80 °
- Dip
- -61 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.8 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 68.0 %·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 6.8 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.8”
Context: CB-20-17
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-20-17Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-20-17
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 971 m
- To
- 981 m
- Intercept Depth
- 971 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-20-17:971-981
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 80 °
- Dip
- -61 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-20-17
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-20-17Corner Bay · silverGrade: 22.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-20-17
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 22.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 971 m
- To
- 981 m
- Intercept Depth
- 971 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-20-17:971-981
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 80 °
- Dip
- -61 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.3 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 223.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“22.3”
Context: CB-20-17
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-20-18Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-20-18
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.3 m
- From
- 1021.9 m
- To
- 1028.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1021.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-20-18:1021.9-1028.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -66 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 18.9 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.0”
Context: CB-20-18
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-20-18Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-20-18
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.3 m
- From
- 1021.9 m
- To
- 1028.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1021.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-20-18:1021.9-1028.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -66 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-20-18
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-20-18Corner Bay · silverGrade: 6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-20-18
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.3 m
- From
- 1021.9 m
- To
- 1028.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1021.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-20-18:1021.9-1028.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -66 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 37.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.0”
Context: CB-20-18
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-20-19Corner Bay · copperGrade: 4.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-20-19
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 1160.8 m
- To
- 1167.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1160.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-20-19:1160.8-1167.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 84 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.1 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 26.6 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4.1 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.1”
Context: CB-20-19
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-20-19Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-20-19
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 1160.8 m
- To
- 1167.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1160.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-20-19:1160.8-1167.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 84 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-20-19
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-20-19Corner Bay · silverGrade: 13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-20-19
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 1160.8 m
- To
- 1167.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1160.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-20-19:1160.8-1167.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 84 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 84.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 13 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.0”
Context: CB-20-19
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-20-20Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-20-20
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 255 m
- To
- 261.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 255 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-20-20:255-261.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 115 °
- Dip
- -75 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 11.0 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.7 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: CB-20-20
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-20-20Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-20-20
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 255 m
- To
- 261.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 255 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-20-20:255-261.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 115 °
- Dip
- -75 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-20-20
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-20-20Corner Bay · silverGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-20-20
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 255 m
- To
- 261.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 255 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-20-20:255-261.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 115 °
- Dip
- -75 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 32.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.0”
Context: CB-20-20
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-21Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-21
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15.9 m
- From
- 91.7 m
- To
- 107.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-21:91.7-107.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 115 °
- Dip
- -71 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 11.1 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.7”
Context: CB-21-21
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-21Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-21
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.9 m
- From
- 91.7 m
- To
- 107.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-21:91.7-107.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 115 °
- Dip
- -71 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: CB-21-21
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-21Corner Bay · silverGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-21
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.9 m
- From
- 91.7 m
- To
- 107.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-21:91.7-107.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 115 °
- Dip
- -71 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.8”
Context: CB-21-21
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-21Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-21
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 13.6 m
- From
- 254.4 m
- To
- 268 m
- Intercept Depth
- 254.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-21:254.4-268
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 115 °
- Dip
- -71 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 19.0 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.4 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: CB-21-21
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-21Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-21
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.6 m
- From
- 254.4 m
- To
- 268 m
- Intercept Depth
- 254.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-21:254.4-268
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 115 °
- Dip
- -71 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: CB-21-21
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-21Corner Bay · silverGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-21
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.6 m
- From
- 254.4 m
- To
- 268 m
- Intercept Depth
- 254.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-21:254.4-268
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 115 °
- Dip
- -71 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: CB-21-21
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-22Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-22
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 16.6 m
- From
- 177.4 m
- To
- 194 m
- Intercept Depth
- 177.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-22:177.4-194
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -72 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 21.6 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.3 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: CB-21-22
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-22Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-22
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16.6 m
- From
- 177.4 m
- To
- 194 m
- Intercept Depth
- 177.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-22:177.4-194
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -72 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-21-22
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-22Corner Bay · silverGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-22
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16.6 m
- From
- 177.4 m
- To
- 194 m
- Intercept Depth
- 177.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-22:177.4-194
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -72 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.7”
Context: CB-21-22
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-22Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-22
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.2 m
- From
- 307 m
- To
- 316.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 307 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-22:307-316.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -72 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.6 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 14.7 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.6 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: CB-21-22
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-22Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-22
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.2 m
- From
- 307 m
- To
- 316.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 307 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-22:307-316.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -72 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-21-22
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-22Corner Bay · silverGrade: 3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-22
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.2 m
- From
- 307 m
- To
- 316.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 307 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-22:307-316.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -72 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 27.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.0”
Context: CB-21-22
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-23Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-23
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 118.6 m
- To
- 123.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 118.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-23:118.6-123.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 115 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 5.6 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.2”
Context: CB-21-23
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-23Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-23
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 118.6 m
- To
- 123.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 118.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-23:118.6-123.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 115 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-21-23
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-23Corner Bay · silverGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-23
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 118.6 m
- To
- 123.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 118.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-23:118.6-123.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 115 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 17.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.7”
Context: CB-21-23
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-25Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-25
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 111.7 m
- To
- 115 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-25:111.7-115
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.3 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: CB-21-25
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-25Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-25
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 111.7 m
- To
- 115 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-25:111.7-115
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.7 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.7”
Context: CB-21-25
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-25Corner Bay · silverGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-25
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 111.7 m
- To
- 115 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-25:111.7-115
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.2”
Context: CB-21-25
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-25Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-25
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 149.6 m
- To
- 152.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 149.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-25:149.6-152.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.5 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: CB-21-25
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-25Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-25
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 149.6 m
- To
- 152.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 149.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-25:149.6-152.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-21-25
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-25Corner Bay · silverGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-25
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 149.6 m
- To
- 152.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 149.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-25:149.6-152.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.5”
Context: CB-21-25
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-26Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-26
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12.5 m
- From
- 214.5 m
- To
- 227 m
- Intercept Depth
- 214.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-26:214.5-227
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 91 °
- Dip
- -75 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 26.3 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: CB-21-26
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-26Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-26
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.5 m
- From
- 214.5 m
- To
- 227 m
- Intercept Depth
- 214.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-26:214.5-227
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 91 °
- Dip
- -75 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 5.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-21-26
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-26Corner Bay · silverGrade: 6.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-26
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.5 m
- From
- 214.5 m
- To
- 227 m
- Intercept Depth
- 214.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-26:214.5-227
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 91 °
- Dip
- -75 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 77.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.2”
Context: CB-21-26
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-26Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-26
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.1 m
- From
- 347.6 m
- To
- 351.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 347.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-26:347.6-351.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 91 °
- Dip
- -75 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 5.3 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.3 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: CB-21-26
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-26Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-26
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.1 m
- From
- 347.6 m
- To
- 351.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 347.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-26:347.6-351.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 91 °
- Dip
- -75 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-21-26
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-26Corner Bay · silverGrade: 3.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-26
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.1 m
- From
- 347.6 m
- To
- 351.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 347.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-26:347.6-351.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 91 °
- Dip
- -75 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 13.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.4”
Context: CB-21-26
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-27Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-27
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 101 m
- To
- 106 m
- Intercept Depth
- 101 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-27:101-106
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 114 °
- Dip
- -52 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 6.0 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.2”
Context: CB-21-27
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-27Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-27
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 101 m
- To
- 106 m
- Intercept Depth
- 101 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-27:101-106
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 114 °
- Dip
- -52 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-21-27
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-27Corner Bay · silverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-27
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 101 m
- To
- 106 m
- Intercept Depth
- 101 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-27:101-106
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 114 °
- Dip
- -52 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 20.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.0”
Context: CB-21-27
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-28Corner Bay · copperGrade: 5.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-28
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- 1146.7 m
- To
- 1150.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1146.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-28:1146.7-1150.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 89 °
- Dip
- -69 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.1 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 18.9 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.1 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.1”
Context: CB-21-28
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-28Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-28
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- 1146.7 m
- To
- 1150.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1146.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-28:1146.7-1150.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 89 °
- Dip
- -69 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-21-28
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-28Corner Bay · silverGrade: 11.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-28
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- 1146.7 m
- To
- 1150.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1146.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-28:1146.7-1150.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 89 °
- Dip
- -69 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 41.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 11.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.3”
Context: CB-21-28
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-29Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-29
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 1050.2 m
- To
- 1053.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1050.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-29:1050.2-1053.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.8 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 9.2 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.8 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.8”
Context: CB-21-29
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-29Corner Bay · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-29
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 1050.2 m
- To
- 1053.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1050.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-29:1050.2-1053.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: CB-21-29
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-29Corner Bay · silverGrade: 7.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-29
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 1050.2 m
- To
- 1053.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1050.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-29:1050.2-1053.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 23.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.2”
Context: CB-21-29
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-30Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-30
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.5 m
- From
- 1005 m
- To
- 1015.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1005 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-30:1005-1015.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 82 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 23.1 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.2”
Context: CB-21-30
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-30Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-30
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.5 m
- From
- 1005 m
- To
- 1015.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1005 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-30:1005-1015.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 82 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 5.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.5 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: CB-21-30
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-30Corner Bay · silverGrade: 3.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-30
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.5 m
- From
- 1005 m
- To
- 1015.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1005 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-30:1005-1015.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 82 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 36.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.5”
Context: CB-21-30
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-31Corner Bay · copperGrade: 4.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-31
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 424.4 m
- To
- 427.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 424.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-31:424.4-427.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -57 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.1 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 12.3 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4.1 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.1”
Context: CB-21-31
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-31Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-31
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 424.4 m
- To
- 427.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 424.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-31:424.4-427.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -57 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-21-31
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-31Corner Bay · silverGrade: 9.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-31
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 424.4 m
- To
- 427.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 424.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-31:424.4-427.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -57 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 29.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.8”
Context: CB-21-31
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-32Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-32
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.5 m
- From
- 1119.5 m
- To
- 1125 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1119.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-32:1119.5-1125
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.5 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 19.3 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.5 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.5”
Context: CB-21-32
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-32Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-32
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.5 m
- From
- 1119.5 m
- To
- 1125 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1119.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-32:1119.5-1125
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-21-32
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-32Corner Bay · silverGrade: 8.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-32
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.5 m
- From
- 1119.5 m
- To
- 1125 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1119.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-32:1119.5-1125
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 46.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.4”
Context: CB-21-32
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-32W1Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-32W1
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 13.9 m
- From
- 1071.8 m
- To
- 1085.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1071.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-32W1:1071.8-1085.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.6 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 36.1 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.6 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.6”
Context: CB-21-32W1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-32W1Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-32W1
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.9 m
- From
- 1071.8 m
- To
- 1085.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1071.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-32W1:1071.8-1085.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-21-32W1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-32W1Corner Bay · silverGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-32W1
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.9 m
- From
- 1071.8 m
- To
- 1085.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1071.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-32W1:1071.8-1085.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 34.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.5”
Context: CB-21-32W1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-32W2Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-32W2
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.6 m
- From
- 1036.6 m
- To
- 1046.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1036.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-32W2:1036.6-1046.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 21.1 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.2”
Context: CB-21-32W2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-32W2Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-32W2
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.6 m
- From
- 1036.6 m
- To
- 1046.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1036.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-32W2:1036.6-1046.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-21-32W2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-32W2Corner Bay · silverGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-32W2
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.6 m
- From
- 1036.6 m
- To
- 1046.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1036.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-32W2:1036.6-1046.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.1”
Context: CB-21-32W2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-33Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-33
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 470 m
- To
- 472.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 470 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-33:470-472.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 110 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.9 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: CB-21-33
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-33Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-33
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 470 m
- To
- 472.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 470 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-33:470-472.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 110 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-21-33
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-33Corner Bay · silverGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-33
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 470 m
- To
- 472.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 470 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-33:470-472.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 110 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: CB-21-33
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-34Corner Bay · copperGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-34
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 1161.2 m
- To
- 1164.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1161.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-34:1161.2-1164.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 75 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.5 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 16.2 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4.5 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.5”
Context: CB-21-34
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-34Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-34
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 1161.2 m
- To
- 1164.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1161.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-34:1161.2-1164.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 75 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-21-34
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-34Corner Bay · silverGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-34
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 1161.2 m
- To
- 1164.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1161.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-34:1161.2-1164.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 75 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.2”
Context: CB-21-34
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-35Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-35
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.8 m
- From
- 427.8 m
- To
- 433.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 427.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-35:427.8-433.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 100 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.6 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 9.3 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.6 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: CB-21-35
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-35Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-35
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.8 m
- From
- 427.8 m
- To
- 433.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 427.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-35:427.8-433.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 100 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-21-35
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-35Corner Bay · silverGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-35
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.8 m
- From
- 427.8 m
- To
- 433.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 427.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-35:427.8-433.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 100 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: CB-21-35
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-36Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-36
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.1 m
- From
- 607.8 m
- To
- 612.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 607.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-36:607.8-612.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 5.6 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.1”
Context: CB-21-36
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-36Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-36
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.1 m
- From
- 607.8 m
- To
- 612.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 607.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-36:607.8-612.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-21-36
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-36Corner Bay · silverGrade: 7.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-36
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.1 m
- From
- 607.8 m
- To
- 612.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 607.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-36:607.8-612.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 37.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.3”
Context: CB-21-36
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-37Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-37
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 534.5 m
- To
- 539.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 534.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-37:534.5-539.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -61 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 13.5 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.0”
Context: CB-21-37
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-37Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-37
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 534.5 m
- To
- 539.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 534.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-37:534.5-539.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -61 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-21-37
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-37Corner Bay · silverGrade: 12.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-37
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 534.5 m
- To
- 539.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 534.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-37:534.5-539.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -61 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 58.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 12.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.9”
Context: CB-21-37
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-38Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-38
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.4 m
- From
- 678.2 m
- To
- 682.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 678.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-38:678.2-682.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.8 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 7.9 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.8 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.8”
Context: CB-21-38
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-38Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-38
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.4 m
- From
- 678.2 m
- To
- 682.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 678.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-38:678.2-682.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-21-38
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-38Corner Bay · silverGrade: 8.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-38
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.4 m
- From
- 678.2 m
- To
- 682.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 678.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-38:678.2-682.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 37.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.6”
Context: CB-21-38
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-39Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-39
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 1175.6 m
- To
- 1178.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1175.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-39:1175.6-1178.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 4.6 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.7 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: CB-21-39
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-39Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-39
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 1175.6 m
- To
- 1178.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1175.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-39:1175.6-1178.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-21-39
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-39Corner Bay · silverGrade: 12.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-39
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 1175.6 m
- To
- 1178.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1175.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-39:1175.6-1178.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 32.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 12.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.1”
Context: CB-21-39
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-39W1Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-39W1
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- From
- 1154.1 m
- To
- 1156.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1154.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-39W1:1154.1-1156.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.6 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: CB-21-39W1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-39W1Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-39W1
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- From
- 1154.1 m
- To
- 1156.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1154.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-39W1:1154.1-1156.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: CB-21-39W1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-39W1Corner Bay · silverGrade: 5.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-39W1
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- From
- 1154.1 m
- To
- 1156.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1154.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-39W1:1154.1-1156.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 14.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.5”
Context: CB-21-39W1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-41Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-41
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- From
- 967.6 m
- To
- 971.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 967.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-41:967.6-971.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.3 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 9.7 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.3 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.3”
Context: CB-21-41
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-41Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-41
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- From
- 967.6 m
- To
- 971.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 967.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-41:967.6-971.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-21-41
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-41Corner Bay · silverGrade: 14.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-41
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- From
- 967.6 m
- To
- 971.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 967.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-41:967.6-971.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 92 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 61.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 14.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“14.7”
Context: CB-21-41
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-42Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-42
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.9 m
- From
- 1042.6 m
- To
- 1051.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1042.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-42:1042.6-1051.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 110 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 15.1 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.7 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: CB-21-42
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-42Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-42
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.9 m
- From
- 1042.6 m
- To
- 1051.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1042.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-42:1042.6-1051.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 110 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-21-42
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-42Corner Bay · silverGrade: 8.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-42
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.9 m
- From
- 1042.6 m
- To
- 1051.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1042.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-42:1042.6-1051.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 110 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 73.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.2”
Context: CB-21-42
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-44Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-44
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 1191.6 m
- To
- 1194.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1191.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-44:1191.6-1194.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 63 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.8 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 5.2 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.8 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.8”
Context: CB-21-44
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-44Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-44
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 1191.6 m
- To
- 1194.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1191.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-44:1191.6-1194.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 63 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-21-44
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-44Corner Bay · silverGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-44
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 1191.6 m
- To
- 1194.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1191.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-44:1191.6-1194.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 63 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: CB-21-44
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-45Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-45
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 1157.2 m
- To
- 1161 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1157.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-45:1157.2-1161
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 65 °
- Dip
- -61 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 11.4 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.0”
Context: CB-21-45
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-45Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-45
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 1157.2 m
- To
- 1161 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1157.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-45:1157.2-1161
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 65 °
- Dip
- -61 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-21-45
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-45Corner Bay · silverGrade: 4.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-45
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 1157.2 m
- To
- 1161 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1157.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-45:1157.2-1161
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 65 °
- Dip
- -61 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 16.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.2”
Context: CB-21-45
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-47Corner Bay · copperGrade: 5.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-47
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.3 m
- From
- 1230 m
- To
- 1237.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1230 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-47:1230-1237.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 63 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.1 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 37.2 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.1 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.1”
Context: CB-21-47
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-47Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-47
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.3 m
- From
- 1230 m
- To
- 1237.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1230 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-47:1230-1237.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 63 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-21-47
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-47Corner Bay · silverGrade: 6.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-47
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.3 m
- From
- 1230 m
- To
- 1237.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1230 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-47:1230-1237.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 63 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 47.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.5”
Context: CB-21-47
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-48Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-48
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 1259.8 m
- To
- 1263.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1259.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-48:1259.8-1263.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -72 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.6 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 6.4 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.6 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: CB-21-48
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-48Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-48
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 1259.8 m
- To
- 1263.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1259.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-48:1259.8-1263.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -72 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-21-48
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-48Corner Bay · silverGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-48
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 1259.8 m
- To
- 1263.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1259.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-48:1259.8-1263.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -72 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.7”
Context: CB-21-48
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-49Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-49
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 1122.3 m
- To
- 1128.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1122.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-49:1122.3-1128.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 66 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.3 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 20.1 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.3 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.3”
Context: CB-21-49
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-49Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-49
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 1122.3 m
- To
- 1128.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1122.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-49:1122.3-1128.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 66 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-21-49
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-49Corner Bay · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-49
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 1122.3 m
- To
- 1128.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1122.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-49:1122.3-1128.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 66 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: CB-21-49
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-50Corner Bay · copperGrade: 5.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-50
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.2 m
- From
- 667.3 m
- To
- 673.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 667.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-50:667.3-673.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 118 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.8 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 36.0 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.8 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.8”
Context: CB-21-50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-50Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-50
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.2 m
- From
- 667.3 m
- To
- 673.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 667.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-50:667.3-673.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 118 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.5 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: CB-21-50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-50Corner Bay · silverGrade: 32.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-50
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 32.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.2 m
- From
- 667.3 m
- To
- 673.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 667.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-50:667.3-673.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 118 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 32.2 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 199.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“32.2”
Context: CB-21-50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-51Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-51
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.4 m
- From
- 1141.5 m
- To
- 1146.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1141.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-51:1141.5-1146.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 11.9 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.2”
Context: CB-21-51
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-51Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-51
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.4 m
- From
- 1141.5 m
- To
- 1146.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1141.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-51:1141.5-1146.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-21-51
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-51Corner Bay · silverGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-51
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.4 m
- From
- 1141.5 m
- To
- 1146.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1141.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-51:1141.5-1146.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: CB-21-51
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-52Corner Bay · copperGrade: 9.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-52
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- 598.9 m
- To
- 602.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 598.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-52:598.9-602.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 115 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 11.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.4 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 34.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 9.4 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.4”
Context: CB-21-52
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-52Corner Bay · goldGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-52
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- 598.9 m
- To
- 602.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 598.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-52:598.9-602.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 115 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 11.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.8 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.4 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.8”
Context: CB-21-52
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-52Corner Bay · silverGrade: 36.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-52
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 36.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- 598.9 m
- To
- 602.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 598.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-52:598.9-602.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 115 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 11.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 36.5 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 135.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“36.5”
Context: CB-21-52
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-53Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-53
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 767 m
- To
- 770.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 767 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-53:767-770.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 135 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 6.6 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: CB-21-53
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-53Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-53
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 767 m
- To
- 770.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 767 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-53:767-770.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 135 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-21-53
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-53Corner Bay · silverGrade: 4.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-53
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 767 m
- To
- 770.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 767 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-53:767-770.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 135 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 14.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.3”
Context: CB-21-53
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-54Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-54
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 1149.5 m
- To
- 1152.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1149.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-54:1149.5-1152.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 58 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.9 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 5.3 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.9 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.9”
Context: CB-21-54
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-54Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-54
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 1149.5 m
- To
- 1152.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1149.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-54:1149.5-1152.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 58 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-21-54
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-54Corner Bay · silverGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-54
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 1149.5 m
- To
- 1152.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1149.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-54:1149.5-1152.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 58 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-21-54
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-55Corner Bay · copperGrade: 7.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-55
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- From
- 673.7 m
- To
- 678 m
- Intercept Depth
- 673.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-55:673.7-678
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 100 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 8.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.3 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 31.4 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.3 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.3”
Context: CB-21-55
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-55Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-55
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- From
- 673.7 m
- To
- 678 m
- Intercept Depth
- 673.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-55:673.7-678
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 100 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 8.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.8 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.8”
Context: CB-21-55
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-55Corner Bay · silverGrade: 37.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-55
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 37.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- From
- 673.7 m
- To
- 678 m
- Intercept Depth
- 673.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-55:673.7-678
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 100 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 8.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 37.7 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 162.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“37.7”
Context: CB-21-55
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-56Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-56
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 1294 m
- To
- 1297 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1294 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-56:1294-1297
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 56 °
- Dip
- -66 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 6.3 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: CB-21-56
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-56Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-56
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 1294 m
- To
- 1297 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1294 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-56:1294-1297
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 56 °
- Dip
- -66 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-21-56
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-56Corner Bay · silverGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-56
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 1294 m
- To
- 1297 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1294 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-56:1294-1297
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 56 °
- Dip
- -66 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: CB-21-56
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-57Corner Bay · copperGrade: 6.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-57
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- From
- 720 m
- To
- 724.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 720 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-57:720-724.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 118 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.2 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 26.0 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 6.2 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.2”
Context: CB-21-57
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-57Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-57
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- From
- 720 m
- To
- 724.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 720 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-57:720-724.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 118 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-21-57
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-57Corner Bay · silverGrade: 24.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-57
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 24.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- From
- 720 m
- To
- 724.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 720 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-57:720-724.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 118 °
- Dip
- -70 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 24.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 103.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 24.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“24.7”
Context: CB-21-57
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-58Corner Bay · copperGrade: 4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-58
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 822 m
- To
- 827 m
- Intercept Depth
- 822 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-58:822-827
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 135 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 20.0 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.0”
Context: CB-21-58
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-58Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-58
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 822 m
- To
- 827 m
- Intercept Depth
- 822 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-58:822-827
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 135 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-21-58
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-58Corner Bay · silverGrade: 23.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-58
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 822 m
- To
- 827 m
- Intercept Depth
- 822 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-58:822-827
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 135 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 117.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 23.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“23.4”
Context: CB-21-58
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-59Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-59
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 13.8 m
- From
- 241.7 m
- To
- 255.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 241.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-59:241.7-255.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 265 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.5 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 34.5 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.5 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.5”
Context: CB-21-59
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-59Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-59
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.8 m
- From
- 241.7 m
- To
- 255.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 241.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-59:241.7-255.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 265 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-21-59
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-59Corner Bay · silverGrade: 2.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-59
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.8 m
- From
- 241.7 m
- To
- 255.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 241.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-59:241.7-255.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 265 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 35.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.6”
Context: CB-21-59
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-60Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-60
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 13.9 m
- From
- 752.7 m
- To
- 766.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 752.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-60:752.7-766.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 135 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.2 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 44.5 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.2 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.2”
Context: CB-21-60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-60Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-60
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.9 m
- From
- 752.7 m
- To
- 766.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 752.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-60:752.7-766.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 135 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-21-60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-60Corner Bay · silverGrade: 18.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-60
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.9 m
- From
- 752.7 m
- To
- 766.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 752.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-60:752.7-766.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 135 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.7 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 259.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“18.7”
Context: CB-21-60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-61Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-61
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 215.1 m
- To
- 219.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 215.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-61:215.1-219.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 275 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.6 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.9”
Context: CB-21-61
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-61Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-61
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 215.1 m
- To
- 219.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 215.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-61:215.1-219.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 275 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-21-61
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-21-61Corner Bay · silverGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-21-61
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 215.1 m
- To
- 219.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 215.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-21-61:215.1-219.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 275 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: CB-21-61
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-63Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-63
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- 1106.5 m
- To
- 1110.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1106.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-63:1106.5-1110.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 80 °
- Dip
- -66 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.5 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 13.0 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.5 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.5”
Context: CB-22-63
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-63Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-63
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- 1106.5 m
- To
- 1110.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1106.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-63:1106.5-1110.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 80 °
- Dip
- -66 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-22-63
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-63Corner Bay · silverGrade: 10Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-63
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- 1106.5 m
- To
- 1110.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1106.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-63:1106.5-1110.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 80 °
- Dip
- -66 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 37.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 10 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.0”
Context: CB-22-63
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-64Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-64
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 17.5 m
- From
- 901.6 m
- To
- 919.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 901.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-64:901.6-919.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 84 °
- Dip
- -54 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.9 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 50.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.9 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.9”
Context: CB-22-64
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-64Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-64
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17.5 m
- From
- 901.6 m
- To
- 919.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 901.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-64:901.6-919.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 84 °
- Dip
- -54 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-22-64
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-64Corner Bay · silverGrade: 16.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-64
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17.5 m
- From
- 901.6 m
- To
- 919.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 901.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-64:901.6-919.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 84 °
- Dip
- -54 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.8 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 294.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.8”
Context: CB-22-64
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-65Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-65
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 1007.6 m
- To
- 1010.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1007.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-65:1007.6-1010.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 91 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.9 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.4 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: CB-22-65
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-65Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-65
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 1007.6 m
- To
- 1010.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1007.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-65:1007.6-1010.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 91 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-22-65
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-65Corner Bay · silverGrade: 6.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-65
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 1007.6 m
- To
- 1010.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1007.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-65:1007.6-1010.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 91 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 17.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.2”
Context: CB-22-65
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-66Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-66
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 895.4 m
- To
- 898.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 895.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-66:895.4-898.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 91 °
- Dip
- -57 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.9 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.3 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: CB-22-66
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-66Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-66
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 895.4 m
- To
- 898.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 895.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-66:895.4-898.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 91 °
- Dip
- -57 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-22-66
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-66Corner Bay · silverGrade: 10.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-66
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 895.4 m
- To
- 898.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 895.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-66:895.4-898.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 91 °
- Dip
- -57 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 32.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 10.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.8”
Context: CB-22-66
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-67Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-67
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.3 m
- From
- 984.8 m
- To
- 994.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 984.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-67:984.8-994.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 83 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 8.4 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.9”
Context: CB-22-67
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-67Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-67
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.3 m
- From
- 984.8 m
- To
- 994.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 984.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-67:984.8-994.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 83 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-22-67
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-67Corner Bay · silverGrade: 3.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-67
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.3 m
- From
- 984.8 m
- To
- 994.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 984.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-67:984.8-994.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 83 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 32.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.5”
Context: CB-22-67
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-68Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 20.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-68
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 20.9 m
- From
- 924.6 m
- To
- 945.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 924.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-68:924.6-945.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 99 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.9 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 60.6 %·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.9 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.9”
Context: CB-22-68
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-68Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-68
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20.9 m
- From
- 924.6 m
- To
- 945.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 924.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-68:924.6-945.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 99 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-22-68
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-68Corner Bay · silverGrade: 11.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-68
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20.9 m
- From
- 924.6 m
- To
- 945.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 924.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-68:924.6-945.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 99 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.3 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 236.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.3”
Context: CB-22-68
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-69Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-69
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 1027.4 m
- To
- 1030.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1027.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-69:1027.4-1030.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 82 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.5 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 8.5 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.5 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.5”
Context: CB-22-69
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-69Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-69
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 1027.4 m
- To
- 1030.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1027.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-69:1027.4-1030.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 82 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-22-69
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-69Corner Bay · silverGrade: 8.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-69
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 1027.4 m
- To
- 1030.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1027.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-69:1027.4-1030.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 82 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 28.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.5”
Context: CB-22-69
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-70Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-70
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- From
- 616.8 m
- To
- 622.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 616.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-70:616.8-622.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 96 °
- Dip
- -52 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 5.3 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: CB-22-70
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-70Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-70
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- From
- 616.8 m
- To
- 622.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 616.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-70:616.8-622.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 96 °
- Dip
- -52 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-22-70
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-70Corner Bay · silverGrade: 9.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-70
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- From
- 616.8 m
- To
- 622.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 616.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-70:616.8-622.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 96 °
- Dip
- -52 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 50.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.5”
Context: CB-22-70
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-71Corner Bay · copperGrade: 4.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-71
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.7 m
- From
- 923.3 m
- To
- 932 m
- Intercept Depth
- 923.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-71:923.3-932
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 93 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.3 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 37.4 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4.3 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.3”
Context: CB-22-71
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-71Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-71
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.7 m
- From
- 923.3 m
- To
- 932 m
- Intercept Depth
- 923.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-71:923.3-932
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 93 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-22-71
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-71Corner Bay · silverGrade: 23.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-71
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.7 m
- From
- 923.3 m
- To
- 932 m
- Intercept Depth
- 923.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-71:923.3-932
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 93 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23.6 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 205.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“23.6”
Context: CB-22-71
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-72Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-72
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 1070.6 m
- To
- 1074 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1070.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-72:1070.6-1074
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 89 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.4 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: CB-22-72
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-72Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-72
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 1070.6 m
- To
- 1074 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1070.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-72:1070.6-1074
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 89 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-22-72
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-72Corner Bay · silverGrade: 3.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-72
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 1070.6 m
- To
- 1074 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1070.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-72:1070.6-1074
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 89 °
- Dip
- -68 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.4”
Context: CB-22-72
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-73Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-73
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 721.5 m
- To
- 723 m
- Intercept Depth
- 721.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-73:721.5-723
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 100 °
- Dip
- -57 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.9 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: CB-22-73
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-73Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-73
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 721.5 m
- To
- 723 m
- Intercept Depth
- 721.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-73:721.5-723
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 100 °
- Dip
- -57 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-22-73
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-73Corner Bay · silverGrade: 5.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-73
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 721.5 m
- To
- 723 m
- Intercept Depth
- 721.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-73:721.5-723
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 100 °
- Dip
- -57 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.1”
Context: CB-22-73
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-74Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-74
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 983.6 m
- To
- 986.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 983.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-74:983.6-986.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.9 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.9”
Context: CB-22-74
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-74Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-74
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 983.6 m
- To
- 986.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 983.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-74:983.6-986.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-22-74
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-74Corner Bay · silverGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-74
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 983.6 m
- To
- 986.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 983.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-74:983.6-986.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.7”
Context: CB-22-74
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-76Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-76
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.4 m
- From
- 954.8 m
- To
- 960.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 954.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-76:954.8-960.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 87 °
- Dip
- -61 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.4 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 18.4 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.4 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.4”
Context: CB-22-76
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-76Corner Bay · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-76
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.4 m
- From
- 954.8 m
- To
- 960.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 954.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-76:954.8-960.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 87 °
- Dip
- -61 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 5.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: CB-22-76
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-76Corner Bay · silverGrade: 23.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-76
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.4 m
- From
- 954.8 m
- To
- 960.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 954.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-76:954.8-960.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 87 °
- Dip
- -61 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 128.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 23.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“23.7”
Context: CB-22-76
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-77Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-77
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 547.8 m
- To
- 551.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 547.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-77:547.8-551.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- 48 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 6.5 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.7 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: CB-22-77
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-77Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-77
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 547.8 m
- To
- 551.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 547.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-77:547.8-551.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- 48 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-22-77
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-77Corner Bay · silverGrade: 8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-77
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 547.8 m
- To
- 551.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 547.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-77:547.8-551.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- 48 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 30.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.0”
Context: CB-22-77
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-78Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-78
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 1049.1 m
- To
- 1053.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1049.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-78:1049.1-1053.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- 65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.3 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 10.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.3 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.3”
Context: CB-22-78
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-78Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-78
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 1049.1 m
- To
- 1053.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1049.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-78:1049.1-1053.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- 65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-22-78
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-78Corner Bay · silverGrade: 7.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-78
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 1049.1 m
- To
- 1053.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1049.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-78:1049.1-1053.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- 65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 35.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.6”
Context: CB-22-78
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-79Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-79
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 1051.7 m
- To
- 1055.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1051.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-79:1051.7-1055.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 81 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 5.3 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.5 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: CB-22-79
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-79Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-79
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 1051.7 m
- To
- 1055.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1051.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-79:1051.7-1055.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 81 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-22-79
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-79Corner Bay · silverGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-79
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 1051.7 m
- To
- 1055.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1051.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-79:1051.7-1055.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 81 °
- Dip
- -67 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 15.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.5”
Context: CB-22-79
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-80Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-80
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 986.5 m
- To
- 989.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 986.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-80:986.5-989.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 85 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 4.1 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.4 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: CB-22-80
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-80Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-80
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 986.5 m
- To
- 989.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 986.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-80:986.5-989.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 85 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-22-80
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-80Corner Bay · silverGrade: 4.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-80
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 986.5 m
- To
- 989.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 986.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-80:986.5-989.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 85 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 13.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.7”
Context: CB-22-80
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-81Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-81
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 592.3 m
- To
- 595.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 592.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-81:592.3-595.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-22-81
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-81Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-81
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 592.3 m
- To
- 595.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 592.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-81:592.3-595.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-22-81
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-81Corner Bay · silverGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-81
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 592.3 m
- To
- 595.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 592.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-81:592.3-595.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.7”
Context: CB-22-81
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-82Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-82
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 1122.2 m
- To
- 1125.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1122.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-82:1122.2-1125.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 78 °
- Dip
- -69 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 5.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.7 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: CB-22-82
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-82Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-82
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 1122.2 m
- To
- 1125.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1122.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-82:1122.2-1125.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 78 °
- Dip
- -69 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: CB-22-82
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-82Corner Bay · silverGrade: 3.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-82
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 1122.2 m
- To
- 1125.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1122.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-82:1122.2-1125.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 78 °
- Dip
- -69 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.8”
Context: CB-22-82
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-83Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-83
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- From
- 1063.3 m
- To
- 1065.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1063.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-83:1063.3-1065.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.7 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 9.6 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.7 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.7”
Context: CB-22-83
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-83Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-83
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- From
- 1063.3 m
- To
- 1065.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1063.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-83:1063.3-1065.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-22-83
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-83Corner Bay · silverGrade: 10.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-83
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- From
- 1063.3 m
- To
- 1065.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1063.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-83:1063.3-1065.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 26.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 10.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.3”
Context: CB-22-83
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-84Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-84
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 657.5 m
- To
- 660.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 657.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-84:657.5-660.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 83 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.8 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 10.3 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.8 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.8”
Context: CB-22-84
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-84Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-84
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 657.5 m
- To
- 660.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 657.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-84:657.5-660.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 83 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-22-84
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-84Corner Bay · silverGrade: 28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-84
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 657.5 m
- To
- 660.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 657.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-84:657.5-660.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 83 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 28 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 75.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 28 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“28.0”
Context: CB-22-84
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-84Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-84
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 867.4 m
- To
- 870.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 867.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-84:867.4-870.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 83 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.5 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.8”
Context: CB-22-84
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-84Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-84
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 867.4 m
- To
- 870.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 867.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-84:867.4-870.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 83 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: CB-22-84
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-84Corner Bay · silverGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-84
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 867.4 m
- To
- 870.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 867.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-84:867.4-870.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 83 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.3”
Context: CB-22-84
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-85Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-85
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 981.4 m
- To
- 984.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 981.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-85:981.4-984.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.6 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 5.0 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.6 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: CB-22-85
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-85Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-85
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 981.4 m
- To
- 984.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 981.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-85:981.4-984.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-22-85
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-85Corner Bay · silverGrade: 4.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-85
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 981.4 m
- To
- 984.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 981.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-85:981.4-984.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 14.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.7”
Context: CB-22-85
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-86Corner Bay · copperGrade: 5.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-86
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.1 m
- From
- 1067.7 m
- To
- 1072.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1067.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-86:1067.7-1072.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -66 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.7 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 29.1 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.7 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.7”
Context: CB-22-86
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-86Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-86
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.1 m
- From
- 1067.7 m
- To
- 1072.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1067.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-86:1067.7-1072.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -66 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-22-86
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-86Corner Bay · silverGrade: 18.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-86
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.1 m
- From
- 1067.7 m
- To
- 1072.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1067.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-86:1067.7-1072.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -66 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 93.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 18.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“18.3”
Context: CB-22-86
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-87Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-87
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.2 m
- From
- 565.8 m
- To
- 568 m
- Intercept Depth
- 565.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-87:565.8-568
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 83 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.6 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.2”
Context: CB-22-87
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-87Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-87
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.2 m
- From
- 565.8 m
- To
- 568 m
- Intercept Depth
- 565.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-87:565.8-568
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 83 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-22-87
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-87Corner Bay · silverGrade: 11.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-87
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.2 m
- From
- 565.8 m
- To
- 568 m
- Intercept Depth
- 565.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-87:565.8-568
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 83 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 26.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 11.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.8”
Context: CB-22-87
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-88Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-88
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 1128 m
- To
- 1130.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1128 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-88:1128-1130.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -69 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.5 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.2”
Context: CB-22-88
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-88Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-88
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 1128 m
- To
- 1130.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1128 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-88:1128-1130.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -69 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-22-88
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-88Corner Bay · silverGrade: 4.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-88
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 1128 m
- To
- 1130.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1128 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-88:1128-1130.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -69 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.6”
Context: CB-22-88
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-89Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-89
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 705.7 m
- To
- 709.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 705.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-89:705.7-709.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 81 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.3 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 11.2 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.3 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.3”
Context: CB-22-89
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-89Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-89
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 705.7 m
- To
- 709.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 705.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-89:705.7-709.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 81 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-22-89
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-89Corner Bay · silverGrade: 25.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-89
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 25.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 705.7 m
- To
- 709.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 705.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-89:705.7-709.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 81 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 25.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 86.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 25.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“25.3”
Context: CB-22-89
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-90Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-90
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 1006.8 m
- To
- 1011.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1006.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-90:1006.8-1011.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 103 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.9 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 18.3 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.9 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.9”
Context: CB-22-90
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-90Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-90
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 1006.8 m
- To
- 1011.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1006.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-90:1006.8-1011.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 103 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-22-90
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-90Corner Bay · silverGrade: 12.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-90
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 1006.8 m
- To
- 1011.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1006.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-90:1006.8-1011.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 103 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 60.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 12.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.8”
Context: CB-22-90
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-91Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-91
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- From
- 617.4 m
- To
- 621.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 617.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-91:617.4-621.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 82 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 6.3 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.5 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: CB-22-91
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-91Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-91
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- From
- 617.4 m
- To
- 621.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 617.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-91:617.4-621.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 82 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: CB-22-91
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-91Corner Bay · silverGrade: 5.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-91
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- From
- 617.4 m
- To
- 621.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 617.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-91:617.4-621.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 82 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 22.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.3”
Context: CB-22-91
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-92Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-92
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 754.5 m
- To
- 758.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 754.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-92:754.5-758.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 79 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 6.0 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.5 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: CB-22-92
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-92Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-92
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 754.5 m
- To
- 758.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 754.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-92:754.5-758.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 79 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-22-92
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-92Corner Bay · silverGrade: 10.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-92
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 754.5 m
- To
- 758.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 754.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-92:754.5-758.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 79 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 40.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 10.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.1”
Context: CB-22-92
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-93Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-93
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 1184.7 m
- To
- 1191.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1184.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-93:1184.7-1191.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 102 °
- Dip
- -71 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 9.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.5 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: CB-22-93
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-93Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-93
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 1184.7 m
- To
- 1191.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1184.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-93:1184.7-1191.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 102 °
- Dip
- -71 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-22-93
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-93Corner Bay · silverGrade: 5.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-93
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 1184.7 m
- To
- 1191.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1184.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-93:1184.7-1191.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 102 °
- Dip
- -71 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 34.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.3”
Context: CB-22-93
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-94Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-94
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.3 m
- From
- 692 m
- To
- 694.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 692 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-94:692-694.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 75 °
- Dip
- -54 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.6 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.7 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.6 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: CB-22-94
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-94Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-94
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.3 m
- From
- 692 m
- To
- 694.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 692 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-94:692-694.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 75 °
- Dip
- -54 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: CB-22-94
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-94Corner Bay · silverGrade: 12.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-94
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.3 m
- From
- 692 m
- To
- 694.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 692 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-94:692-694.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 75 °
- Dip
- -54 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 27.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 12.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.1”
Context: CB-22-94
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-96Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-96
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 807.7 m
- To
- 811 m
- Intercept Depth
- 807.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-96:807.7-811
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 104 °
- Dip
- -57 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.5 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 8.3 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.5 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.5”
Context: CB-22-96
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-96Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-96
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 807.7 m
- To
- 811 m
- Intercept Depth
- 807.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-96:807.7-811
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 104 °
- Dip
- -57 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-22-96
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-96Corner Bay · silverGrade: 21.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-96
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 21.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 807.7 m
- To
- 811 m
- Intercept Depth
- 807.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-96:807.7-811
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 104 °
- Dip
- -57 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 70.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 21.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“21.2”
Context: CB-22-96
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-96Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-96
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 852.5 m
- To
- 855.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 852.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-96:852.5-855.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 104 °
- Dip
- -57 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.4 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 10.5 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.4 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.4”
Context: CB-22-96
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-96Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-96
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 852.5 m
- To
- 855.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 852.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-96:852.5-855.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 104 °
- Dip
- -57 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-22-96
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-96Corner Bay · silverGrade: 32.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-96
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 32.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 852.5 m
- To
- 855.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 852.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-96:852.5-855.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 104 °
- Dip
- -57 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 32.2 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 99.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“32.2”
Context: CB-22-96
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-97Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-97
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- From
- 760.8 m
- To
- 766.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 760.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-97:760.8-766.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 103 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.9 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 10.1 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.9 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.9”
Context: CB-22-97
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-97Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-97
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- From
- 760.8 m
- To
- 766.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 760.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-97:760.8-766.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 103 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-22-97
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-97Corner Bay · silverGrade: 12.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-97
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- From
- 760.8 m
- To
- 766.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 760.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-97:760.8-766.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 103 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 64.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 12.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.2”
Context: CB-22-97
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-97Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-97
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 824.2 m
- To
- 827.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 824.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-97:824.2-827.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 103 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 5.3 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.7 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: CB-22-97
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-97Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-97
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 824.2 m
- To
- 827.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 824.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-97:824.2-827.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 103 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: CB-22-97
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-97Corner Bay · silverGrade: 4.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-97
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 824.2 m
- To
- 827.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 824.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-97:824.2-827.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 103 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 15.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.9”
Context: CB-22-97
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-98Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-98
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 726.4 m
- To
- 730.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 726.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-98:726.4-730.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 101 °
- Dip
- -49 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.9 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 7.6 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.9 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.9”
Context: CB-22-98
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-98Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-98
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 726.4 m
- To
- 730.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 726.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-98:726.4-730.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 101 °
- Dip
- -49 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-22-98
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-98Corner Bay · silverGrade: 6.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-98
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 726.4 m
- To
- 730.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 726.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-98:726.4-730.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 101 °
- Dip
- -49 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.2”
Context: CB-22-98
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-99W1Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-99W1
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 857.6 m
- To
- 861.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 857.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-99W1:857.6-861.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 114 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 5.2 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.3 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: CB-22-99W1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-99W1Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-99W1
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 857.6 m
- To
- 861.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 857.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-99W1:857.6-861.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 114 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-22-99W1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-22-99W1Corner Bay · silverGrade: 11.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-22-99W1
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 857.6 m
- To
- 861.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 857.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-22-99W1:857.6-861.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 114 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 44.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 11.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.1”
Context: CB-22-99W1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-95-01Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-95-01
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 19.5 m
- From
- 1137.9 m
- To
- 1157.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1137.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-95-01:1137.9-1157.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 42.9 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.2”
Context: CB-95-01
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-95-01Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-95-01
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19.5 m
- From
- 1137.9 m
- To
- 1157.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1137.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-95-01:1137.9-1157.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-95-01
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-95-01Corner Bay · silverGrade: 5.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-95-01
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19.5 m
- From
- 1137.9 m
- To
- 1157.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1137.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-95-01:1137.9-1157.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 99.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.1”
Context: CB-95-01
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-F-11Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-F-11
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 151.6 m
- To
- 154.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 151.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-F-11:151.6-154.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.1”
Context: CB-F-11
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-F-11Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-F-11
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 151.6 m
- To
- 154.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 151.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-F-11:151.6-154.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-F-11
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-F-11Corner Bay · silverGrade: 3.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-F-11
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 151.6 m
- To
- 154.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 151.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-F-11:151.6-154.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.8”
Context: CB-F-11
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-F-13Corner Bay · copperGrade: 4.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-F-13
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.6 m
- From
- 137.3 m
- To
- 146.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 137.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-F-13:137.3-146.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -54 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.1 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 39.4 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4.1 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.1”
Context: CB-F-13
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-F-13Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-F-13
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.6 m
- From
- 137.3 m
- To
- 146.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 137.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-F-13:137.3-146.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -54 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-F-13
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-F-13Corner Bay · silverGrade: 13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-F-13
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.6 m
- From
- 137.3 m
- To
- 146.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 137.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-F-13:137.3-146.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -54 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 124.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 13 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.0”
Context: CB-F-13
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-F-13Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-F-13
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
- From
- 154 m
- To
- 157.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 154 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-F-13:154-157.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -54 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.9 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: CB-F-13
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-F-13Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-F-13
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
- From
- 154 m
- To
- 157.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 154 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-F-13:154-157.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -54 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.6 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: CB-F-13
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-F-13Corner Bay · silverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-F-13
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
- From
- 154 m
- To
- 157.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 154 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-F-13:154-157.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -54 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 15.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.0”
Context: CB-F-13
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-F-14Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-F-14
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.9 m
- From
- 159.1 m
- To
- 165 m
- Intercept Depth
- 159.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-F-14:159.1-165
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 10.0 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.7 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: CB-F-14
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-F-14Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-F-14
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.9 m
- From
- 159.1 m
- To
- 165 m
- Intercept Depth
- 159.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-F-14:159.1-165
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: CB-F-14
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-F-14Corner Bay · silverGrade: 14.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-F-14
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.9 m
- From
- 159.1 m
- To
- 165 m
- Intercept Depth
- 159.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-F-14:159.1-165
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 87.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 14.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“14.9”
Context: CB-F-14
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-F-14Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-F-14
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 167.4 m
- To
- 173.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 167.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-F-14:167.4-173.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.3 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 20.1 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.3 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.3”
Context: CB-F-14
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-F-14Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-F-14
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 167.4 m
- To
- 173.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 167.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-F-14:167.4-173.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-F-14
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-F-14Corner Bay · silverGrade: 27.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-F-14
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 27.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 167.4 m
- To
- 173.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 167.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-F-14:167.4-173.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 27.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 169.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 27.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“27.7”
Context: CB-F-14
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-F-15Corner Bay · copperGrade: 6.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-F-15
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 330.4 m
- To
- 336.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 330.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-F-15:330.4-336.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 89 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.3 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 38.4 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 6.3 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.3”
Context: CB-F-15
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-F-15Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-F-15
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 330.4 m
- To
- 336.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 330.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-F-15:330.4-336.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 89 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.8 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.8”
Context: CB-F-15
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-F-15Corner Bay · silverGrade: 12.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-F-15
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 330.4 m
- To
- 336.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 330.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-F-15:330.4-336.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 89 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 73.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 12.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.1”
Context: CB-F-15
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-F-16Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-F-16
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 14.9 m
- From
- 366.4 m
- To
- 381.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 366.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-F-16:366.4-381.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 32.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.2”
Context: CB-F-16
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-F-16Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-F-16
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.9 m
- From
- 366.4 m
- To
- 381.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 366.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-F-16:366.4-381.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-F-16
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-F-16Corner Bay · silverGrade: 7.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-F-16
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.9 m
- From
- 366.4 m
- To
- 381.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 366.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-F-16:366.4-381.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 105.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.1”
Context: CB-F-16
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-F-17Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-F-17
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 423.2 m
- To
- 426.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 423.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-F-17:423.2-426.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.6 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 8.8 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.6 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.6”
Context: CB-F-17
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-F-17Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-F-17
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 423.2 m
- To
- 426.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 423.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-F-17:423.2-426.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: CB-F-17
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-F-17Corner Bay · silverGrade: 10.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-F-17
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 423.2 m
- To
- 426.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 423.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-F-17:423.2-426.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 34.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 10.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.1”
Context: CB-F-17
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-F-17Corner Bay · copperGrade: 6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-F-17
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.9 m
- From
- 459.8 m
- To
- 468.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 459.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-F-17:459.8-468.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 53.4 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 6 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.0”
Context: CB-F-17
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-F-17Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-F-17
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.9 m
- From
- 459.8 m
- To
- 468.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 459.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-F-17:459.8-468.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: CB-F-17
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
CB-F-17Corner Bay · silverGrade: 34.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CB-F-17
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 34.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.9 m
- From
- 459.8 m
- To
- 468.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 459.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CB-F-17:459.8-468.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 34.2 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 304.4 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“34.2”
Context: CB-F-17
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-1Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-1
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 107.8 m
- To
- 111.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-1:107.8-111.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 75 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.6 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 9.1 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.6 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.6”
Context: F-1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-1Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-1
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 107.8 m
- To
- 111.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-1:107.8-111.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 75 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: F-1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-1Corner Bay · silverGrade: 10.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-1
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 107.8 m
- To
- 111.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-1:107.8-111.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 75 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 37.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 10.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.6”
Context: F-1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-100Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-100
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 523.3 m
- To
- 528 m
- Intercept Depth
- 523.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-100:523.3-528
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 96 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 4.2 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.9”
Context: F-100
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-100Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-100
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 523.3 m
- To
- 528 m
- Intercept Depth
- 523.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-100:523.3-528
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 96 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: F-100
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-100Corner Bay · silverGrade: 2.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-100
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 523.3 m
- To
- 528 m
- Intercept Depth
- 523.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-100:523.3-528
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 96 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.6”
Context: F-100
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-101Corner Bay · copperGrade: 7.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-101
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 783.1 m
- To
- 786.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 783.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-101:783.1-786.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 278 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.3 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 21.9 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.3 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.3”
Context: F-101
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-101Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-101
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 783.1 m
- To
- 786.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 783.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-101:783.1-786.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 278 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: F-101
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-101Corner Bay · silverGrade: 24.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-101
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 24.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 783.1 m
- To
- 786.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 783.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-101:783.1-786.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 278 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 24.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 74.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 24.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“24.7”
Context: F-101
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-101Corner Bay · copperGrade: 5.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-101
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.8 m
- From
- 913 m
- To
- 918.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 913 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-101:913-918.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 278 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.1 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 29.6 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.1 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.1”
Context: F-101
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-101Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-101
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.8 m
- From
- 913 m
- To
- 918.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 913 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-101:913-918.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 278 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: F-101
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-101Corner Bay · silverGrade: 19.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-101
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.8 m
- From
- 913 m
- To
- 918.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 913 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-101:913-918.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 278 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 113.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 19.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“19.5”
Context: F-101
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-103Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-103
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 595.3 m
- To
- 595.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 595.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-103:595.3-595.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 278 °
- Dip
- -52 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.2 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.3 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.2 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.2”
Context: F-103
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-103Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-103
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 595.3 m
- To
- 595.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 595.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-103:595.3-595.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 278 °
- Dip
- -52 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.6 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: F-103
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-103Corner Bay · silverGrade: 6.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-103
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 595.3 m
- To
- 595.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 595.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-103:595.3-595.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 278 °
- Dip
- -52 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.7”
Context: F-103
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-18Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-18
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 387.6 m
- To
- 388.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 387.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-18:387.6-388.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.8”
Context: F-18
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-18Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-18
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 387.6 m
- To
- 388.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 387.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-18:387.6-388.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: F-18
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-18Corner Bay · silverGrade: 3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-18
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 387.6 m
- To
- 388.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 387.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-18:387.6-388.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.0”
Context: F-18
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-20Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-20
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 17.4 m
- From
- 402.6 m
- To
- 420 m
- Intercept Depth
- 402.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-20:402.6-420
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 106 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 38.3 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.2”
Context: F-20
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-20Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-20
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17.4 m
- From
- 402.6 m
- To
- 420 m
- Intercept Depth
- 402.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-20:402.6-420
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 106 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: F-20
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-20Corner Bay · silverGrade: 5.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-20
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17.4 m
- From
- 402.6 m
- To
- 420 m
- Intercept Depth
- 402.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-20:402.6-420
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 106 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 99.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.7”
Context: F-20
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-22Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-22
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 272.3 m
- To
- 275.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 272.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-22:272.3-275.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.6 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 5.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.6 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: F-22
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-22Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-22
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 272.3 m
- To
- 275.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 272.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-22:272.3-275.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: F-22
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-22Corner Bay · silverGrade: 4.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-22
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 272.3 m
- To
- 275.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 272.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-22:272.3-275.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 14.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.1”
Context: F-22
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-22Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-22
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.3 m
- From
- 279.7 m
- To
- 282 m
- Intercept Depth
- 279.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-22:279.7-282
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.3 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: F-22
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-22Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-22
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.3 m
- From
- 279.7 m
- To
- 282 m
- Intercept Depth
- 279.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-22:279.7-282
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: F-22
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-22Corner Bay · silverGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-22
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.3 m
- From
- 279.7 m
- To
- 282 m
- Intercept Depth
- 279.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-22:279.7-282
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.7”
Context: F-22
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-23Corner Bay · copperGrade: 5.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-23
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 147.4 m
- To
- 151.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 147.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-23:147.4-151.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.5 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 22.0 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.5 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.5”
Context: F-23
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-23Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-23
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 147.4 m
- To
- 151.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 147.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-23:147.4-151.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: F-23
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-23Corner Bay · silverGrade: 15.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-23
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 147.4 m
- To
- 151.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 147.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-23:147.4-151.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 60.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 15.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.1”
Context: F-23
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-23Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-23
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 158.6 m
- To
- 161.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 158.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-23:158.6-161.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.3 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.8”
Context: F-23
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-23Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-23
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 158.6 m
- To
- 161.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 158.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-23:158.6-161.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: F-23
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-23Corner Bay · silverGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-23
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 158.6 m
- To
- 161.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 158.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-23:158.6-161.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.2”
Context: F-23
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-24Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-24
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 264.2 m
- To
- 267.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 264.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-24:264.2-267.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.6 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.9”
Context: F-24
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-24Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-24
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 264.2 m
- To
- 267.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 264.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-24:264.2-267.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: F-24
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-24Corner Bay · silverGrade: 4.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-24
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 264.2 m
- To
- 267.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 264.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-24:264.2-267.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -58 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.3”
Context: F-24
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-25Corner Bay · copperGrade: 6.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-25
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 260.1 m
- To
- 263.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 260.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-25:260.1-263.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.1 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 22.0 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 6.1 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.1”
Context: F-25
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-25Corner Bay · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-25
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 260.1 m
- To
- 263.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 260.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-25:260.1-263.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: F-25
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-25Corner Bay · silverGrade: 14.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-25
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 260.1 m
- To
- 263.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 260.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-25:260.1-263.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 51.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 14.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“14.2”
Context: F-25
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-25Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-25
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 273 m
- To
- 275.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 273 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-25:273-275.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.4 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: F-25
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-25Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-25
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 273 m
- To
- 275.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 273 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-25:273-275.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: F-25
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-25Corner Bay · silverGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-25
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 273 m
- To
- 275.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 273 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-25:273-275.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: F-25
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-26Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-26
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 269.4 m
- To
- 272.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 269.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-26:269.4-272.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.3 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 7.4 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.3 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.3”
Context: F-26
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-26Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-26
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 269.4 m
- To
- 272.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 269.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-26:269.4-272.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.5 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: F-26
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-26Corner Bay · silverGrade: 10.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-26
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 269.4 m
- To
- 272.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 269.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-26:269.4-272.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 32.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 10.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.1”
Context: F-26
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-27Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-27
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 332 m
- To
- 334.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 332 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-27:332-334.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.3 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 6.7 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.3 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.3”
Context: F-27
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-27Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-27
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 332 m
- To
- 334.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 332 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-27:332-334.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: F-27
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-27Corner Bay · silverGrade: 22.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-27
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 22.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 332 m
- To
- 334.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 332 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-27:332-334.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 65.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 22.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“22.4”
Context: F-27
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-27Corner Bay · copperGrade: 5.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-27
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 364.1 m
- To
- 367.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 364.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-27:364.1-367.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.1 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 19.4 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.1 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.1”
Context: F-27
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-27Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-27
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 364.1 m
- To
- 367.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 364.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-27:364.1-367.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: F-27
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-27Corner Bay · silverGrade: 12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-27
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 364.1 m
- To
- 367.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 364.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-27:364.1-367.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 45.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 12 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.0”
Context: F-27
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-28Corner Bay · copperGrade: 5.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-28
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 276.1 m
- To
- 279.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 276.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-28:276.1-279.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.1 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 17.3 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.1 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.1”
Context: F-28
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-28Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-28
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 276.1 m
- To
- 279.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 276.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-28:276.1-279.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.5 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: F-28
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-28Corner Bay · silverGrade: 13.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-28
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 276.1 m
- To
- 279.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 276.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-28:276.1-279.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 44.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 13.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.1”
Context: F-28
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-29Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-29
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 325.6 m
- To
- 328.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 325.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-29:325.6-328.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.0 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: F-29
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-29Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-29
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 325.6 m
- To
- 328.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 325.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-29:325.6-328.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: F-29
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-29Corner Bay · silverGrade: 3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-29
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 325.6 m
- To
- 328.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 325.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-29:325.6-328.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.0”
Context: F-29
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-30Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-30
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 380.1 m
- To
- 382.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 380.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-30:380.1-382.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.5 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.4 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: F-30
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-30Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-30
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 380.1 m
- To
- 382.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 380.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-30:380.1-382.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: F-30
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-30Corner Bay · silverGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-30
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 380.1 m
- To
- 382.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 380.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-30:380.1-382.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.2”
Context: F-30
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-31Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-31
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 219.6 m
- To
- 223.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 219.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-31:219.6-223.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.9 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 6.6 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.9 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.9”
Context: F-31
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-31Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-31
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 219.6 m
- To
- 223.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 219.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-31:219.6-223.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: F-31
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-31Corner Bay · silverGrade: 8.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-31
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 219.6 m
- To
- 223.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 219.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-31:219.6-223.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 29.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.4”
Context: F-31
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-31Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-31
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 227.7 m
- To
- 228.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 227.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-31:227.7-228.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: F-31
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-31Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-31
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 227.7 m
- To
- 228.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 227.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-31:227.7-228.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: F-31
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-31Corner Bay · silverGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-31
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 227.7 m
- To
- 228.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 227.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-31:227.7-228.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: F-31
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-32Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-32
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 267 m
- To
- 272 m
- Intercept Depth
- 267 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-32:267-272
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.8 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 9.0 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.8 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.8”
Context: F-32
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-32Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-32
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 267 m
- To
- 272 m
- Intercept Depth
- 267 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-32:267-272
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.6 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: F-32
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-32Corner Bay · silverGrade: 6.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-32
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 267 m
- To
- 272 m
- Intercept Depth
- 267 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-32:267-272
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 30.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.1”
Context: F-32
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-33Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-33
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- From
- 331.6 m
- To
- 334.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 331.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-33:331.6-334.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.6 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: F-33
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-33Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-33
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- From
- 331.6 m
- To
- 334.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 331.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-33:331.6-334.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: F-33
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-33Corner Bay · silverGrade: 3.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-33
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- From
- 331.6 m
- To
- 334.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 331.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-33:331.6-334.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.5”
Context: F-33
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-35Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-35
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 206.8 m
- To
- 210.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 206.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-35:206.8-210.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.6 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 5.3 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.6 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: F-35
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-35Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-35
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 206.8 m
- To
- 210.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 206.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-35:206.8-210.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: F-35
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-35Corner Bay · silverGrade: 5.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-35
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 206.8 m
- To
- 210.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 206.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-35:206.8-210.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 17.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.2”
Context: F-35
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-35Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-35
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 225.4 m
- To
- 228.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 225.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-35:225.4-228.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 6.4 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: F-35
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-35Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-35
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 225.4 m
- To
- 228.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 225.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-35:225.4-228.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: F-35
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-35Corner Bay · silverGrade: 10.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-35
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 225.4 m
- To
- 228.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 225.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-35:225.4-228.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 32.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 10.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.2”
Context: F-35
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-36Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-36
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- From
- 289.5 m
- To
- 293.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 289.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-36:289.5-293.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.8 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 11.8 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.8 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.8”
Context: F-36
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-36Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-36
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- From
- 289.5 m
- To
- 293.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 289.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-36:289.5-293.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: F-36
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-36Corner Bay · silverGrade: 9.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-36
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- From
- 289.5 m
- To
- 293.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 289.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-36:289.5-293.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 39.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.5”
Context: F-36
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-37Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-37
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 90.5 m
- To
- 93.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 90.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-37:90.5-93.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.0 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.7”
Context: F-37
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-37Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-37
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 90.5 m
- To
- 93.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 90.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-37:90.5-93.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: F-37
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-37Corner Bay · silverGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-37
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 90.5 m
- To
- 93.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 90.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-37:90.5-93.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: F-37
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-37Corner Bay · copperGrade: 8.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-37
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 111.5 m
- To
- 115 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-37:111.5-115
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 8.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.2 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 28.7 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.2 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.2”
Context: F-37
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-37Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-37
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 111.5 m
- To
- 115 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-37:111.5-115
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 8.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: F-37
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-37Corner Bay · silverGrade: 22.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-37
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 22.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 111.5 m
- To
- 115 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-37:111.5-115
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 8.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 78.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 22.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“22.5”
Context: F-37
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-38Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-38
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.4 m
- From
- 329 m
- To
- 334.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 329 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-38:329-334.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 8.1 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.5 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: F-38
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-38Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-38
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.4 m
- From
- 329 m
- To
- 334.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 329 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-38:329-334.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: F-38
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-38Corner Bay · silverGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-38
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.4 m
- From
- 329 m
- To
- 334.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 329 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-38:329-334.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 27.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.0”
Context: F-38
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-39Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-39
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 206.1 m
- To
- 209.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 206.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-39:206.1-209.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.5 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.7”
Context: F-39
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-39Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-39
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 206.1 m
- To
- 209.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 206.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-39:206.1-209.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: F-39
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-39Corner Bay · silverGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-39
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 206.1 m
- To
- 209.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 206.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-39:206.1-209.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -59 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.3”
Context: F-39
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-4Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-4
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.1 m
- From
- 148.8 m
- To
- 153.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 148.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-4:148.8-153.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: F-4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-4Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-4
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.1 m
- From
- 148.8 m
- To
- 153.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 148.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-4:148.8-153.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: F-4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-4Corner Bay · silverGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-4
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.1 m
- From
- 148.8 m
- To
- 153.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 148.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-4:148.8-153.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.9”
Context: F-4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-40Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-40
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 260.5 m
- To
- 262.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 260.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-40:260.5-262.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: F-40
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-40Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-40
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 260.5 m
- To
- 262.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 260.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-40:260.5-262.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: F-40
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-40Corner Bay · silverGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-40
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 260.5 m
- To
- 262.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 260.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-40:260.5-262.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -56 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.2”
Context: F-40
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-41Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-41
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.2 m
- From
- 327.5 m
- To
- 336.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 327.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-41:327.5-336.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.4 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 22.1 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.4 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.4”
Context: F-41
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-41Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-41
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.2 m
- From
- 327.5 m
- To
- 336.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 327.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-41:327.5-336.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: F-41
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-41Corner Bay · silverGrade: 6.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-41
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.2 m
- From
- 327.5 m
- To
- 336.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 327.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-41:327.5-336.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 60.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.6”
Context: F-41
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-42Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-42
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 225.4 m
- To
- 226.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 225.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-42:225.4-226.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.4 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.2”
Context: F-42
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-42Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-42
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 225.4 m
- To
- 226.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 225.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-42:225.4-226.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: F-42
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-42Corner Bay · silverGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-42
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 225.4 m
- To
- 226.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 225.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-42:225.4-226.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: F-42
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-42Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-42
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- 240.8 m
- To
- 244.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 240.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-42:240.8-244.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 7.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: F-42
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-42Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-42
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- 240.8 m
- To
- 244.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 240.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-42:240.8-244.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: F-42
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-42Corner Bay · silverGrade: 7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-42
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- 240.8 m
- To
- 244.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 240.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-42:240.8-244.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 25.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.0”
Context: F-42
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-44Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-44
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 666.5 m
- To
- 671.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 666.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-44:666.5-671.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 7.5 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.5 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: F-44
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-44Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-44
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 666.5 m
- To
- 671.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 666.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-44:666.5-671.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: F-44
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-44Corner Bay · silverGrade: 4.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-44
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 666.5 m
- To
- 671.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 666.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-44:666.5-671.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 23.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.6”
Context: F-44
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-44WCorner Bay · copperGrade: 6.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-44W
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 754.9 m
- To
- 758.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 754.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-44W:754.9-758.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.6 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 21.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 6.6 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.6”
Context: F-44W
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-44WCorner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-44W
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 754.9 m
- To
- 758.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 754.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-44W:754.9-758.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: F-44W
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-44WCorner Bay · silverGrade: 30.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-44W
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 30.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 754.9 m
- To
- 758.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 754.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-44W:754.9-758.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -60 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 30.9 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 102.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“30.9”
Context: F-44W
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-53Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-53
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.4 m
- From
- 469.8 m
- To
- 474.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 469.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-53:469.8-474.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 4.4 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: F-53
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-53Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-53
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.4 m
- From
- 469.8 m
- To
- 474.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 469.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-53:469.8-474.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: F-53
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-53Corner Bay · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-53
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.4 m
- From
- 469.8 m
- To
- 474.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 469.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-53:469.8-474.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -62 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: F-53
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-6Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-6
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 174.5 m
- To
- 175.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 174.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-6:174.5-175.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -52 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: F-6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-6Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-6
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 174.5 m
- To
- 175.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 174.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-6:174.5-175.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -52 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: F-6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-6Corner Bay · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-6
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 174.5 m
- To
- 175.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 174.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-6:174.5-175.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -52 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: F-6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-6Corner Bay · copperGrade: 6.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-6
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.9 m
- From
- 198.1 m
- To
- 208 m
- Intercept Depth
- 198.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-6:198.1-208
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -52 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.4 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 63.4 %·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 6.4 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.4”
Context: F-6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-6Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-6
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.9 m
- From
- 198.1 m
- To
- 208 m
- Intercept Depth
- 198.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-6:198.1-208
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -52 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 5.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.5 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: F-6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-6Corner Bay · silverGrade: 12.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-6
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.9 m
- From
- 198.1 m
- To
- 208 m
- Intercept Depth
- 198.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-6:198.1-208
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -52 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 126.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 12.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.8”
Context: F-6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-61Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-61
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.8 m
- From
- 275.4 m
- To
- 280.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 275.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-61:275.4-280.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.7 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 13.0 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.7 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.7”
Context: F-61
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-61Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-61
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.8 m
- From
- 275.4 m
- To
- 280.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 275.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-61:275.4-280.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: F-61
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-61Corner Bay · silverGrade: 5.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-61
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.8 m
- From
- 275.4 m
- To
- 280.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 275.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-61:275.4-280.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.1”
Context: F-61
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-62Corner Bay · copperGrade: 6.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-62
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 70.1 m
- To
- 71.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-62:70.1-71.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.6 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 9.2 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 6.6 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.6”
Context: F-62
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-62Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-62
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 70.1 m
- To
- 71.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-62:70.1-71.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: F-62
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-62Corner Bay · silverGrade: 17.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-62
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 70.1 m
- To
- 71.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-62:70.1-71.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 17.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“17.6”
Context: F-62
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-62Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-62
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 72.5 m
- To
- 73.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-62:72.5-73.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.8”
Context: F-62
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-62Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-62
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 72.5 m
- To
- 73.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-62:72.5-73.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: F-62
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-62Corner Bay · silverGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-62
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 72.5 m
- To
- 73.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-62:72.5-73.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.9”
Context: F-62
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-62Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-62
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- From
- 101.8 m
- To
- 107.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 101.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-62:101.8-107.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.1 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 16.4 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.1 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.1”
Context: F-62
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-62Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-62
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- From
- 101.8 m
- To
- 107.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 101.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-62:101.8-107.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: F-62
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-62Corner Bay · silverGrade: 6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-62
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.3 m
- From
- 101.8 m
- To
- 107.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 101.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-62:101.8-107.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 31.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.0”
Context: F-62
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-63Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-63
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 160 m
- To
- 165 m
- Intercept Depth
- 160 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-63:160-165
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.8 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 14.0 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.8 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.8”
Context: F-63
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-63Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-63
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 160 m
- To
- 165 m
- Intercept Depth
- 160 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-63:160-165
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: F-63
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-63Corner Bay · silverGrade: 6.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-63
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 160 m
- To
- 165 m
- Intercept Depth
- 160 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-63:160-165
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 34.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.9”
Context: F-63
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-64Corner Bay · copperGrade: 7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-64
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.8 m
- From
- 188 m
- To
- 192.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 188 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-64:188-192.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 33.6 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.0”
Context: F-64
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-64Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-64
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.8 m
- From
- 188 m
- To
- 192.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 188 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-64:188-192.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: F-64
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-64Corner Bay · silverGrade: 7.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-64
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.8 m
- From
- 188 m
- To
- 192.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 188 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-64:188-192.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 34.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.1”
Context: F-64
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-65Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-65
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.8 m
- From
- 293.4 m
- To
- 298.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 293.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-65:293.4-298.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 6.7 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.4 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: F-65
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-65Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-65
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.8 m
- From
- 293.4 m
- To
- 298.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 293.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-65:293.4-298.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: F-65
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-65Corner Bay · silverGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-65
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.8 m
- From
- 293.4 m
- To
- 298.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 293.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-65:293.4-298.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.4”
Context: F-65
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-66Corner Bay · copperGrade: 7.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-66
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 175.4 m
- To
- 178.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 175.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-66:175.4-178.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 8.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.4 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 26.6 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.4 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.4”
Context: F-66
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-66Corner Bay · goldGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-66
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 175.4 m
- To
- 178.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 175.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-66:175.4-178.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 8.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.2”
Context: F-66
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-66Corner Bay · silverGrade: 19.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-66
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 175.4 m
- To
- 178.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 175.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-66:175.4-178.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 8.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 71.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 19.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“19.8”
Context: F-66
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-67Corner Bay · copperGrade: 4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-67
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 220.2 m
- To
- 224 m
- Intercept Depth
- 220.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-67:220.2-224
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 15.2 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.0”
Context: F-67
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-67Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-67
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 220.2 m
- To
- 224 m
- Intercept Depth
- 220.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-67:220.2-224
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.5 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: F-67
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-67Corner Bay · silverGrade: 9.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-67
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 220.2 m
- To
- 224 m
- Intercept Depth
- 220.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-67:220.2-224
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 35.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.4”
Context: F-67
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-68Corner Bay · copperGrade: 5.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-68
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 170.9 m
- To
- 173.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 170.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-68:170.9-173.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.7 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 14.3 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.7 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.7”
Context: F-68
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-68Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-68
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 170.9 m
- To
- 173.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 170.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-68:170.9-173.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: F-68
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-68Corner Bay · silverGrade: 17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-68
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 170.9 m
- To
- 173.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 170.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-68:170.9-173.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 42.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 17 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“17.0”
Context: F-68
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-68Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-68
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.1 m
- From
- 192 m
- To
- 196.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 192 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-68:192-196.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.4 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 9.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.4 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.4”
Context: F-68
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-68Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-68
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.1 m
- From
- 192 m
- To
- 196.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 192 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-68:192-196.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: F-68
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-68Corner Bay · silverGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-68
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.1 m
- From
- 192 m
- To
- 196.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 192 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-68:192-196.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 20.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.0”
Context: F-68
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-69Corner Bay · copperGrade: 5.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-69
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 270.5 m
- To
- 275.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 270.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-69:270.5-275.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.3 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 26.5 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.3 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.3”
Context: F-69
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-69Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-69
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 270.5 m
- To
- 275.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 270.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-69:270.5-275.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: F-69
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-69Corner Bay · silverGrade: 11.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-69
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 270.5 m
- To
- 275.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 270.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-69:270.5-275.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 57.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 11.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.5”
Context: F-69
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-7Corner Bay · copperGrade: 4.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-7
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 92.6 m
- To
- 95.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 92.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-7:92.6-95.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.6 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 12.9 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4.6 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.6”
Context: F-7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-7Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-7
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 92.6 m
- To
- 95.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 92.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-7:92.6-95.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: F-7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-7Corner Bay · silverGrade: 11.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-7
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 92.6 m
- To
- 95.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 92.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-7:92.6-95.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 32.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 11.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.7”
Context: F-7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-70Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-70
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 179.3 m
- To
- 181.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 179.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-70:179.3-181.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.8 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.7”
Context: F-70
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-70Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-70
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 179.3 m
- To
- 181.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 179.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-70:179.3-181.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: F-70
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-70Corner Bay · silverGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-70
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 179.3 m
- To
- 181.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 179.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-70:179.3-181.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.4”
Context: F-70
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-70Corner Bay · copperGrade: 7.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-70
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 220.1 m
- To
- 223.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 220.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-70:220.1-223.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.6 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 23.6 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.6 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.6”
Context: F-70
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-70Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-70
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 220.1 m
- To
- 223.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 220.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-70:220.1-223.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: F-70
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-70Corner Bay · silverGrade: 12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-70
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 220.1 m
- To
- 223.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 220.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-70:220.1-223.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 37.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 12 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.0”
Context: F-70
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-71Corner Bay · copperGrade: 7.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-71
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.3 m
- From
- 313.1 m
- To
- 321.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 313.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-71:313.1-321.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -47 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.7 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 63.9 %·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.7 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.7”
Context: F-71
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-71Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-71
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.3 m
- From
- 313.1 m
- To
- 321.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 313.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-71:313.1-321.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -47 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: F-71
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-71Corner Bay · silverGrade: 13.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-71
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.3 m
- From
- 313.1 m
- To
- 321.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 313.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-71:313.1-321.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -47 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 112.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 13.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.6”
Context: F-71
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-72Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-72
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 336.5 m
- To
- 337.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 336.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-72:336.5-337.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: F-72
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-72Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-72
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 336.5 m
- To
- 337.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 336.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-72:336.5-337.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: F-72
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-72Corner Bay · silverGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-72
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 336.5 m
- To
- 337.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 336.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-72:336.5-337.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: F-72
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-72Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-72
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 368 m
- To
- 372.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 368 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-72:368-372.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 6.4 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.4 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: F-72
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-72Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-72
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 368 m
- To
- 372.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 368 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-72:368-372.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: F-72
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-72Corner Bay · silverGrade: 6.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-72
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 368 m
- To
- 372.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 368 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-72:368-372.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -53 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 29.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.4”
Context: F-72
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-73Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-73
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.9 m
- From
- 324 m
- To
- 329.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 324 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-73:324-329.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.1 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 18.3 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.1 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.1”
Context: F-73
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-73Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-73
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.9 m
- From
- 324 m
- To
- 329.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 324 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-73:324-329.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: F-73
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-73Corner Bay · silverGrade: 6.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-73
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.9 m
- From
- 324 m
- To
- 329.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 324 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-73:324-329.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 39.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.7”
Context: F-73
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-74Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-74
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 359.8 m
- To
- 364.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 359.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-74:359.8-364.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.8 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: F-74
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-74Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-74
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 359.8 m
- To
- 364.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 359.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-74:359.8-364.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: F-74
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-74Corner Bay · silverGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-74
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 359.8 m
- To
- 364.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 359.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-74:359.8-364.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: F-74
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-74Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-74
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 399.2 m
- To
- 402.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 399.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-74:399.2-402.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.9 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 6.6 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.9 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.9”
Context: F-74
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-74Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-74
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 399.2 m
- To
- 402.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 399.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-74:399.2-402.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: F-74
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-74Corner Bay · silverGrade: 9.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-74
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 399.2 m
- To
- 402.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 399.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-74:399.2-402.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 33.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.5”
Context: F-74
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-78Corner Bay · copperGrade: 4.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-78
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 158.8 m
- To
- 161.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 158.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-78:158.8-161.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.4 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 10.6 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4.4 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.4”
Context: F-78
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-78Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-78
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 158.8 m
- To
- 161.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 158.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-78:158.8-161.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: F-78
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-78Corner Bay · silverGrade: 7.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-78
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 158.8 m
- To
- 161.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 158.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-78:158.8-161.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 18.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.5”
Context: F-78
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-78Corner Bay · copperGrade: 5.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 39.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-78
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 39.9 m
- From
- 161.9 m
- To
- 201.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 161.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-78:161.9-201.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.7 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 227.4 %·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.7 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.7”
Context: F-78
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-78Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-78
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 39.9 m
- From
- 161.9 m
- To
- 201.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 161.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-78:161.9-201.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 16.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: F-78
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-78Corner Bay · silverGrade: 9.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-78
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 39.9 m
- From
- 161.9 m
- To
- 201.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 161.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-78:161.9-201.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.4 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 375.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.4”
Context: F-78
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-8Corner Bay · copperGrade: 6.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-8
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 179.1 m
- To
- 182.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 179.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-8:179.1-182.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.8 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 23.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 6.8 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.8”
Context: F-8
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-8Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-8
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 179.1 m
- To
- 182.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 179.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-8:179.1-182.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.5 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: F-8
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-8Corner Bay · silverGrade: 15.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-8
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 179.1 m
- To
- 182.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 179.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-8:179.1-182.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -65 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 54.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 15.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.6”
Context: F-8
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-81Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-81
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 478.3 m
- To
- 479.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 478.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-81:478.3-479.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 96 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.2”
Context: F-81
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-81Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-81
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 478.3 m
- To
- 479.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 478.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-81:478.3-479.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 96 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: F-81
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-81Corner Bay · silverGrade: 5.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-81
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 478.3 m
- To
- 479.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 478.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-81:478.3-479.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 96 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.4”
Context: F-81
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-87Corner Bay · copperGrade: 5.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-87
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 211.5 m
- To
- 215.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 211.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-87:211.5-215.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.3 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 21.2 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.3 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.3”
Context: F-87
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-87Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-87
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 211.5 m
- To
- 215.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 211.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-87:211.5-215.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.6 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: F-87
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-87Corner Bay · silverGrade: 27.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-87
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 27.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 211.5 m
- To
- 215.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 211.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-87:211.5-215.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 27.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 108.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 27.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“27.2”
Context: F-87
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-89Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-89
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- From
- 401.5 m
- To
- 405.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 401.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-89:401.5-405.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 8.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: F-89
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-89Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-89
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- From
- 401.5 m
- To
- 405.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 401.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-89:401.5-405.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: F-89
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-89Corner Bay · silverGrade: 4.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-89
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- From
- 401.5 m
- To
- 405.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 401.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-89:401.5-405.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 20.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.9”
Context: F-89
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-9Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-9
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.4 m
- From
- 141.7 m
- To
- 151.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 141.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-9:141.7-151.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.2 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 30.1 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.2 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.2”
Context: F-9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-9Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-9
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.4 m
- From
- 141.7 m
- To
- 151.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 141.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-9:141.7-151.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.5 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: F-9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-9Corner Bay · silverGrade: 7.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-9
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.4 m
- From
- 141.7 m
- To
- 151.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 141.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-9:141.7-151.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 73.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.8”
Context: F-9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-9Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-9
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.9 m
- From
- 162.4 m
- To
- 169.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 162.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-9:162.4-169.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.4 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 16.6 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.4 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.4”
Context: F-9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-9Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-9
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.9 m
- From
- 162.4 m
- To
- 169.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 162.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-9:162.4-169.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: F-9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-9Corner Bay · silverGrade: 8.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-9
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.9 m
- From
- 162.4 m
- To
- 169.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 162.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-9:162.4-169.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -63 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 58.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.4”
Context: F-9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-90Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-90
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.8 m
- From
- 526.5 m
- To
- 532.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 526.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-90:526.5-532.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 17.4 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.0”
Context: F-90
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-90Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-90
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.8 m
- From
- 526.5 m
- To
- 532.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 526.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-90:526.5-532.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.7 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.7”
Context: F-90
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-90Corner Bay · silverGrade: 15.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-90
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.8 m
- From
- 526.5 m
- To
- 532.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 526.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-90:526.5-532.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 91.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 15.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.7”
Context: F-90
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-91Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-91
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 329 m
- To
- 331 m
- Intercept Depth
- 329 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-91:329-331
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 96 °
- Dip
- -46 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.0 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: F-91
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-91Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-91
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 329 m
- To
- 331 m
- Intercept Depth
- 329 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-91:329-331
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 96 °
- Dip
- -46 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: F-91
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-91Corner Bay · silverGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-91
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 329 m
- To
- 331 m
- Intercept Depth
- 329 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-91:329-331
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 96 °
- Dip
- -46 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.4”
Context: F-91
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-91Corner Bay · copperGrade: 5.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-91
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 349 m
- To
- 354 m
- Intercept Depth
- 349 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-91:349-354
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 96 °
- Dip
- -46 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.7 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 28.5 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.7 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.7”
Context: F-91
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-91Corner Bay · goldGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-91
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 349 m
- To
- 354 m
- Intercept Depth
- 349 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-91:349-354
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 96 °
- Dip
- -46 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.1 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: F-91
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-91Corner Bay · silverGrade: 10.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-91
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 349 m
- To
- 354 m
- Intercept Depth
- 349 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-91:349-354
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 96 °
- Dip
- -46 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 52.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 10.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.4”
Context: F-91
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-92Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-92
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 470.1 m
- To
- 472.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 470.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-92:470.1-472.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 103 °
- Dip
- -44 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.9 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.9”
Context: F-92
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-92Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-92
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 470.1 m
- To
- 472.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 470.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-92:470.1-472.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 103 °
- Dip
- -44 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: F-92
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-92Corner Bay · silverGrade: 9.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-92
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 470.1 m
- To
- 472.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 470.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-92:470.1-472.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 103 °
- Dip
- -44 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 19.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.5”
Context: F-92
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-93Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-93
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- From
- 207.9 m
- To
- 212.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 207.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-93:207.9-212.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 276 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.5 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: F-93
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-93Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-93
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- From
- 207.9 m
- To
- 212.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 207.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-93:207.9-212.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 276 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: F-93
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-93Corner Bay · silverGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-93
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- From
- 207.9 m
- To
- 212.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 207.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-93:207.9-212.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 276 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.2”
Context: F-93
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-93Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-93
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 231.7 m
- To
- 233 m
- Intercept Depth
- 231.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-93:231.7-233
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 276 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: F-93
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-93Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-93
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 231.7 m
- To
- 233 m
- Intercept Depth
- 231.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-93:231.7-233
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 276 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: F-93
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-93Corner Bay · silverGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-93
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 231.7 m
- To
- 233 m
- Intercept Depth
- 231.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-93:231.7-233
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 276 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: F-93
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-93Corner Bay · copperGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-93
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 234.1 m
- To
- 236.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 234.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-93:234.1-236.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 276 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.1 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: F-93
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-93Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-93
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 234.1 m
- To
- 236.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 234.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-93:234.1-236.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 276 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: F-93
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-93Corner Bay · silverGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-93
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 234.1 m
- To
- 236.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 234.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-93:234.1-236.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 276 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: F-93
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-94Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-94
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 435.4 m
- To
- 438.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 435.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-94:435.4-438.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 8.7 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.0”
Context: F-94
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-94Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-94
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 435.4 m
- To
- 438.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 435.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-94:435.4-438.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: F-94
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-94Corner Bay · silverGrade: 6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-94
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 435.4 m
- To
- 438.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 435.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-94:435.4-438.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 17.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.0”
Context: F-94
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-95Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-95
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- From
- 572.7 m
- To
- 577 m
- Intercept Depth
- 572.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-95:572.7-577
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 6.4 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.5 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: F-95
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-95Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-95
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- From
- 572.7 m
- To
- 577 m
- Intercept Depth
- 572.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-95:572.7-577
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: F-95
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-95Corner Bay · silverGrade: 9.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-95
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- From
- 572.7 m
- To
- 577 m
- Intercept Depth
- 572.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-95:572.7-577
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 40.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.3”
Context: F-95
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-96Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-96
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- 166.6 m
- To
- 170.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 166.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-96:166.6-170.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.8 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 10.4 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.8 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.8”
Context: F-96
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-96Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-96
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- 166.6 m
- To
- 170.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 166.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-96:166.6-170.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: F-96
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-96Corner Bay · silverGrade: 6.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-96
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
- From
- 166.6 m
- To
- 170.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 166.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-96:166.6-170.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 23.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.4”
Context: F-96
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-96Corner Bay · copperGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-96
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 183.6 m
- To
- 184.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 183.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-96:183.6-184.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.2 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.2 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.2 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.2”
Context: F-96
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-96Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-96
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 183.6 m
- To
- 184.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 183.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-96:183.6-184.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: F-96
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-96Corner Bay · silverGrade: 7.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-96
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 183.6 m
- To
- 184.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 183.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-96:183.6-184.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 97 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.9”
Context: F-96
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-97Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-97
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 360 m
- To
- 363.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 360 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-97:360-363.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 102 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 6.2 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: F-97
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-97Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-97
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 360 m
- To
- 363.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 360 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-97:360-363.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 102 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: F-97
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-97Corner Bay · silverGrade: 3.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-97
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 360 m
- To
- 363.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 360 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-97:360-363.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 102 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.4”
Context: F-97
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-97Corner Bay · copperGrade: 5.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-97
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- From
- 368 m
- To
- 372.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 368 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-97:368-372.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 102 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.5 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 23.6 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.5 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.5”
Context: F-97
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-97Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-97
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- From
- 368 m
- To
- 372.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 368 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-97:368-372.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 102 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: F-97
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-97Corner Bay · silverGrade: 7.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-97
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- From
- 368 m
- To
- 372.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 368 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-97:368-372.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 102 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 32.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.6”
Context: F-97
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-98Corner Bay · copperGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-98
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
- From
- 353 m
- To
- 356.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 353 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-98:353-356.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.9 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 7.4 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.9 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.9”
Context: F-98
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-98Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-98
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
- From
- 353 m
- To
- 356.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 353 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-98:353-356.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: F-98
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-98Corner Bay · silverGrade: 4.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-98
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
- From
- 353 m
- To
- 356.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 353 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-98:353-356.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 17.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.6”
Context: F-98
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-98-BCorner Bay · copperGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-98-B
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 368.4 m
- To
- 371.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 368.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-98-B:368.4-371.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.8 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 5.6 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.8 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.8”
Context: F-98-B
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-98-BCorner Bay · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-98-B
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 368.4 m
- To
- 371.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 368.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-98-B:368.4-371.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: F-98-B
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-98-BCorner Bay · silverGrade: 4.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-98-B
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 368.4 m
- To
- 371.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 368.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-98-B:368.4-371.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 13.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.3”
Context: F-98-B
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-99Corner Bay · copperGrade: 2.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-99
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 182.4 m
- To
- 185.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 182.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-99:182.4-185.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.6 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 8.1 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.6 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.6”
Context: F-99
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-99Corner Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-99
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 182.4 m
- To
- 185.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 182.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-99:182.4-185.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: F-99
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
F-99Corner Bay · silverGrade: 9.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- F-99
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- CYG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 182.4 m
- To
- 185.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 182.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- F-99:182.4-185.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD83 (Zone 18)
- Azimuth
- 98 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 28.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.2”
Context: F-99
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Resource Estimates (56)
indicatedCorner Bay · copperTonnes: 4900000Grade: 2.5Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 124Contained Unit: ktView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:04fcc22c81370690b90d
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4900000
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 124
- Contained Unit
- kt
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong copper grade in the indicated category, contributing significantly to the project's overall resource base. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · table
“2.5”
Context: 4.9
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
indicatedCorner Bay · goldTonnes: 4900000Grade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 43Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:04fcc22c81370690b90d
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4900000
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 43
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak gold grade in the indicated category, contributing to the project's overall resource base. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: 4.9
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
indicatedCorner Bay · silverTonnes: 4900000Grade: 8.4Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1316Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:04fcc22c81370690b90d
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4900000
- Grade
- 8.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 1316
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak silver grade in the indicated category, contributing to the project's overall resource base. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · table
“8.4”
Context: 4.9
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
inferredCorner Bay · copperTonnes: 5400000Grade: 2.7Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 146Contained Unit: ktView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:6456474df2f40112e9d7
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 5400000
- Grade
- 2.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 146
- Contained Unit
- kt
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong copper grade in the inferred category, indicating potential but with lower geological confidence. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
Evidence · table
“2.7”
Context: 5.4
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
inferredCorner Bay · goldTonnes: 5400000Grade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 41Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:6456474df2f40112e9d7
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 5400000
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 41
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak gold grade in the inferred category, indicating potential but with lower geological confidence. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: 5.4
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
inferredCorner Bay · silverTonnes: 5400000Grade: 8.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1543Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:6456474df2f40112e9d7
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 5400000
- Grade
- 8.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 1543
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak silver grade in the inferred category, indicating potential but with lower geological confidence. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
Evidence · table
“8.9”
Context: 5.4
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
measuredDevlin · copperTonnes: 100000Grade: 2.7Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 4Contained Unit: ktView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Devlin
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:b71aa9ac314ff2bbcd78
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 100000
- Grade
- 2.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 4
- Contained Unit
- kt
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong copper grade in the measured category, indicating high geological confidence. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · table
“2.7”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
measuredDevlin · goldTonnes: 100000Grade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Devlin
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:b71aa9ac314ff2bbcd78
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 100000
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 1
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak gold grade in the measured category, contributing to the project's overall resource base. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
measuredDevlin · silverTonnes: 100000Grade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Devlin
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:b71aa9ac314ff2bbcd78
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 100000
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 2
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak silver grade in the measured category, contributing to the project's overall resource base. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
indicatedDevlin · copperTonnes: 600000Grade: 2Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 13Contained Unit: ktView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Devlin
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:57326c2605274fbd3342
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 600000
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 13
- Contained Unit
- kt
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong copper grade in the indicated category, contributing to the project's overall resource base. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: 0.6
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
indicatedDevlin · goldTonnes: 600000Grade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 4Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Devlin
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:57326c2605274fbd3342
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 600000
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 4
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak gold grade in the indicated category, contributing to the project's overall resource base. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: 0.6
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
indicatedDevlin · silverTonnes: 600000Grade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 5Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Devlin
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:57326c2605274fbd3342
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 600000
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 5
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak silver grade in the indicated category, contributing to the project's overall resource base. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: 0.6
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
indicatedCorner Bay · copperTonnes: 4900000Grade: 2.5Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 124Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:4f3d90dc0b07714d512a
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4900000
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 124
- Contained Unit
- kt
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong copper grade in the indicated category, contributing significantly to the project's overall resource base. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · table
“2.5”
Context: 4.9
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
indicatedCorner Bay · goldTonnes: 4900000Grade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 43Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:4f3d90dc0b07714d512a
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4900000
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 43
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong copper grade in the indicated category, contributing significantly to the project's overall resource base. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: 4.9
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
indicatedCorner Bay · silverTonnes: 4900000Grade: 8.4Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1316Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:4f3d90dc0b07714d512a
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4900000
- Grade
- 8.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 1316
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong copper grade in the indicated category, contributing significantly to the project's overall resource base. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · table
“8.4”
Context: 4.9
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
inferredCorner Bay · copperTonnes: 5400000Grade: 2.7Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 146Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:dd7706d63109a68eeaf6
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 5400000
- Grade
- 2.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 146
- Contained Unit
- kt
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong copper grade in the inferred category, indicating potential but with lower geological confidence. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
Evidence · table
“2.7”
Context: 5.4
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
inferredCorner Bay · goldTonnes: 5400000Grade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 41Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:dd7706d63109a68eeaf6
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 5400000
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 41
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong copper grade in the inferred category, indicating potential but with lower geological confidence. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: 5.4
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
inferredCorner Bay · silverTonnes: 5400000Grade: 8.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1543Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Corner Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:dd7706d63109a68eeaf6
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 5400000
- Grade
- 8.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 1543
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong copper grade in the inferred category, indicating potential but with lower geological confidence. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
Evidence · table
“8.9”
Context: 5.4
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
measuredDevlin · copperTonnes: 100000Grade: 2.7Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 4Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Devlin
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:547be4165ae8ef46511c
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 100000
- Grade
- 2.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 4
- Contained Unit
- kt
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong copper grade in the measured category, indicating high geological confidence. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · table
“2.7”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
measuredDevlin · goldTonnes: 100000Grade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Devlin
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:547be4165ae8ef46511c
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 100000
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 1
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong copper grade in the measured category, indicating high geological confidence. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
measuredDevlin · silverTonnes: 100000Grade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Devlin
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:547be4165ae8ef46511c
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 100000
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 2
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong copper grade in the measured category, indicating high geological confidence. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
indicatedDevlin · copperTonnes: 600000Grade: 2Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 13Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Devlin
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:caacf57a4d00e62ff8fd
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 600000
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 13
- Contained Unit
- kt
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong copper grade in the indicated category, contributing to the project's overall resource base. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: 0.6
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
indicatedDevlin · goldTonnes: 600000Grade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 4Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Devlin
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:caacf57a4d00e62ff8fd
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 600000
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 4
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong copper grade in the indicated category, contributing to the project's overall resource base. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: 0.6
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
indicatedDevlin · silverTonnes: 600000Grade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 5Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Devlin
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:caacf57a4d00e62ff8fd
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 600000
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 5
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong copper grade in the indicated category, contributing to the project's overall resource base. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: 0.6
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
indicatedDevlin · copperTonnes: 800000Grade: 2.1Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 16Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Devlin
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:af0f0c5822cf536cbd0b
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 800000
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 16
- Contained Unit
- kt
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong copper grade in the indicated category, contributing to the project's overall resource base. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
indicatedDevlin · goldTonnes: 800000Grade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 5Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Devlin
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:af0f0c5822cf536cbd0b
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 800000
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 5
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong copper grade in the indicated category, contributing to the project's overall resource base. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
indicatedDevlin · silverTonnes: 800000Grade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 7Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Devlin
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:af0f0c5822cf536cbd0b
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 800000
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 7
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong copper grade in the indicated category, contributing to the project's overall resource base. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
inferredDevlin · copperTonnes: 300000Grade: 2Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 7Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Devlin
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:e2b3c8d1ac45c3b50bcf
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 300000
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 7
- Contained Unit
- kt
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong copper grade in the measured category, indicating high geological confidence. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: 0.3
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
inferredDevlin · goldTonnes: 300000Grade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Devlin
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:e2b3c8d1ac45c3b50bcf
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 300000
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 2
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong copper grade in the measured category, indicating high geological confidence. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: 0.3
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
inferredDevlin · silverTonnes: 300000Grade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Devlin
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:e2b3c8d1ac45c3b50bcf
- Mining method
- underground
- Material type
- mixed
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 300000
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 3
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong copper grade in the measured category, indicating high geological confidence. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: 0.3
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
inferredJoe Mann · copperTonnes: 700000Grade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 2Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Joe Mann
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Resource group id
- resource:0f431b4519960a561799
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 700000
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 2
- Contained Unit
- kt
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: 0.7
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
inferredJoe Mann · goldTonnes: 700000Grade: 6Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 143Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Joe Mann
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Resource group id
- resource:0f431b4519960a561799
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 700000
- Grade
- 6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 143
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“6.0”
Context: 0.7
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
indicatedCedar Bay · copperTonnes: 300000Grade: 1.6Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 4Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Cedar Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Resource group id
- resource:617a5c1a201688c88d78
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 300000
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 4
- Contained Unit
- kt
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.8
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: 0.3
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
indicatedCedar Bay · goldTonnes: 300000Grade: 6Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 50Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Cedar Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Resource group id
- resource:617a5c1a201688c88d78
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 300000
- Grade
- 6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 50
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.8
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“6.0”
Context: 0.3
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
indicatedCedar Bay · silverTonnes: 300000Grade: 9.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 82Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Cedar Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Resource group id
- resource:617a5c1a201688c88d78
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 300000
- Grade
- 9.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 82
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.8
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“9.9”
Context: 0.3
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
inferredCedar Bay · copperTonnes: 800000Grade: 2Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 17Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Cedar Bay
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Resource group id
- resource:e92676acfa3d8b667d1c
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 800000
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 17
- Contained Unit
- kt
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.8
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
inferredCedar Bay · goldTonnes: 800000Grade: 5.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 134Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Cedar Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Resource group id
- resource:e92676acfa3d8b667d1c
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 800000
- Grade
- 5.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 134
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.8
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“5.1”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
inferredCedar Bay · silverTonnes: 800000Grade: 11.8Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 309Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Cedar Bay
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Resource group id
- resource:e92676acfa3d8b667d1c
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 800000
- Grade
- 11.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 309
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.8
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 6.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“11.8”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
indicatedGolden Eye · copperTonnes: 500000Grade: 1Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 5Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Resource group id
- resource:7c7ef029191ba0ff5351
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 500000
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 5
- Contained Unit
- kt
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.8
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
indicatedGolden Eye · goldTonnes: 500000Grade: 4.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 69Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Resource group id
- resource:7c7ef029191ba0ff5351
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 500000
- Grade
- 4.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 69
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.8
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“4.3”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
indicatedGolden Eye · silverTonnes: 500000Grade: 9.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 161Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Resource group id
- resource:7c7ef029191ba0ff5351
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 500000
- Grade
- 9.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 161
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.8
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“9.9”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
inferredGolden Eye · copperTonnes: 1200000Grade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 11Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Resource group id
- resource:0c155e43780abe38c7d3
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1200000
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 11
- Contained Unit
- kt
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.8
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“0.9”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
inferredGolden Eye · goldTonnes: 1200000Grade: 3.4Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 134Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Resource group id
- resource:0c155e43780abe38c7d3
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1200000
- Grade
- 3.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 134
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.8
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“3.4”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
inferredGolden Eye · silverTonnes: 1200000Grade: 7.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 313Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Golden Eye
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Resource group id
- resource:0c155e43780abe38c7d3
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1200000
- Grade
- 7.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 313
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.8
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“7.9”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
measuredcopperTonnes: 100000Grade: 2.7Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 4Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:86522795f9d5db118c32
- Deposit or zone
- Hub and Spoke
- Mining method
- underground
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 100000
- Grade
- 2.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 4
- Contained Unit
- kt
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong copper grade in the measured category, indicating high geological confidence. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · table
“2.7”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
measuredgoldTonnes: 100000Grade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:86522795f9d5db118c32
- Deposit or zone
- Hub and Spoke
- Mining method
- underground
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 100000
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 1
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong copper grade in the measured category, indicating high geological confidence. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
measuredsilverTonnes: 100000Grade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Quebec
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc, ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Louis Beaupre
- Resource group id
- resource:86522795f9d5db118c32
- Deposit or zone
- Hub and Spoke
- Mining method
- underground
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 100000
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 2
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % CuEq
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-09-17
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong copper grade in the measured category, indicating high geological confidence. The estimate is compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- NI 43-101 Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
indicatedcopperTonnes: 6300000Grade: 2.3Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 146Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Resource group id
- resource:1acadd25871d94f6329d
- Deposit or zone
- Hub and Spoke
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 6300000
- Grade
- 2.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 146
- Contained Unit
- kt
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“2.3”
Context: 6.3
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
indicatedgoldTonnes: 6300000Grade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 166Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Resource group id
- resource:1acadd25871d94f6329d
- Deposit or zone
- Hub and Spoke
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 6300000
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 166
- Contained Unit
- koz
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“0.8”
Context: 6.3
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
indicatedsilverTonnes: 6300000Grade: 7.8Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1563Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Resource group id
- resource:1acadd25871d94f6329d
- Deposit or zone
- Hub and Spoke
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 6300000
- Grade
- 7.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 1563
- Contained Unit
- koz
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“7.8”
Context: 6.3
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
indicatedcopperTonnes: 6400000Grade: 2.3Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 149Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Resource group id
- resource:bb31454e4dcaff89f8bd
- Deposit or zone
- Hub and Spoke
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 6400000
- Grade
- 2.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 149
- Contained Unit
- kt
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“2.3”
Context: 6.4
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
indicatedgoldTonnes: 6400000Grade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 167Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Resource group id
- resource:bb31454e4dcaff89f8bd
- Deposit or zone
- Hub and Spoke
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 6400000
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 167
- Contained Unit
- koz
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“0.8”
Context: 6.4
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
indicatedsilverTonnes: 6400000Grade: 7.6Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1565Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Resource group id
- resource:bb31454e4dcaff89f8bd
- Deposit or zone
- Hub and Spoke
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 6400000
- Grade
- 7.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 1565
- Contained Unit
- koz
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“7.6”
Context: 6.4
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
inferredcopperTonnes: 8500000Grade: 2.1Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 182Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Resource group id
- resource:4e6622014c6e6a26d628
- Deposit or zone
- Hub and Spoke
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 8500000
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 182
- Contained Unit
- kt
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: 8.5
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
inferredgoldTonnes: 8500000Grade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 454Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Resource group id
- resource:4e6622014c6e6a26d628
- Deposit or zone
- Hub and Spoke
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 8500000
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 454
- Contained Unit
- koz
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: 8.5
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
inferredsilverTonnes: 8500000Grade: 7.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2168Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CYG
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
- Resource group id
- resource:4e6622014c6e6a26d628
- Deposit or zone
- Hub and Spoke
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 8500000
- Grade
- 7.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 2168
- Contained Unit
- koz
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“7.9”
Context: 8.5
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.