FireFly announces successful A$190m capital raising to fund development and resource growth

Original announcement by globenewswire on

Company
FireFly Metals Ltd
Ticker
FFM
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Primary commodity
Copper
Secondary commodities
Gold, Silver
Document categories
Resource update, Capital raise
Extracted
2026-09-12 01:52:50 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

FireFly Metals Ltd successfully completed a A$190 million capital raise, strongly supported by institutional investors, to fund the development and resource growth of its Green Bay Copper-Gold Project. The funds will advance early works, long-lead items, and feasibility studies, alongside an aggressive exploration program. The project is underpinned by a significant 60.2 Mt Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource at 1.9% copper and 0.5 g/t gold, with disclosed metal equivalent assumptions.

Reasoning: FireFly Metals successfully raised A$190 million to advance its Green Bay Copper-Gold Project, supported by a robust and compliant resource estimate, indicating strong market confidence and clear development pathway.

Positive factors

  • Successful capital raise with strong institutional support
  • Funds allocated for project development and resource growth
  • Significant Measured and Indicated resource base for Green Bay Project
  • Resource estimate compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 standards
  • Metal equivalent assumptions and cut-off grade clearly disclosed

Negative factors

  • Little Deer resource estimate is stale, effective date over two years old

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 47

Classification and evidence

Capital Raisepositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The document announces a successful A$190m capital raising.

Evidence · text

“FireFly announces successful A$190m capital raising”

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The document includes detailed Mineral Resource Estimates for the Green Bay Copper-Gold Project.

Evidence · text

“Mineral Resource Estimate – Green Bay Project”

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The Mineral Resource Estimates are prepared and reported in accordance with the JORC Code 2012.

Evidence · text

“JORC Code (2012 Edition)”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The Mineral Resource Estimates are prepared and reported in accordance with Canadian National Instrument 43-101.

Evidence · text

“Canadian National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ( NI 43-101 )”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Mr Juan Gutierrez, Group Chief Geologist, is named as a Competent Person and Qualified Person responsible for the technical information.

Evidence · text

“Mr Juan Gutierrez BSc, Geology (Masters), Geostatistics (Postgraduate Diploma), who is a Member and Chartered Professional of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Gutierrez is a Competent Person as defined in the JORC Code 2012 and a Qualified Person as defined in NI 43-101.”

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: Mineral Resources have been reported at a 1.0% copper cut-off grade.

Evidence · text

“Mineral Resources have been reported at a 1.0% copper cut-off grade.”

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative · Story-specific tag

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: Metal equivalent assumptions are clearly disclosed, including commodity prices and metallurgical recoveries.

Evidence · text

“Metal equivalents for the Mineral Resource Estimates have been calculated at a copper price of US$10,626/t, gold price of US$3,587/oz and silver price of US$50.22/oz. Individual Mineral Resource grades for the metals are set out in Appendix A of this announcement. Metallurgical factors have been applied to the metal equivalent calculation. Copper recovery used was 95%. Historical production at the Ming Mine has a documented copper recovery of ~96%. Precious metal (gold and silver) metallurgical recovery was assumed at 85% on the basis of historical recoveries achieved at the Ming Mine in addition to historical metallurgical test work to increase precious metal recoveries.”

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: The Little Deer Mineral Resource Estimate has an effective date of 26 June 2024, making it over two years old in the context of this August 2026 announcement.

Evidence · text

“with an effective date of 26 June 2024”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 44. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (44)

measuredGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · copperTonnes: 3500000Grade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 52Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:83c55716b48e62447bbe
Deposit or zone
Ming Deposit
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
3500000
Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
52
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource provides high confidence for project planning with a good copper grade.

Positive factors

  • High confidence resource category
  • Good copper grade
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.5”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · goldTonnes: 3500000Grade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 20Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:83c55716b48e62447bbe
Deposit or zone
Ming Deposit
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
3500000
Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
20
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource provides high confidence for project planning, with gold as a secondary commodity.

Positive factors

  • High confidence resource category
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · silverTonnes: 3500000Grade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 147Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:83c55716b48e62447bbe
Deposit or zone
Ming Deposit
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
3500000
Grade
1.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
147
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource provides high confidence for project planning, with silver as a secondary commodity.

Positive factors

  • High confidence resource category
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.3”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · copperTonnes: 3500000Grade: 1.7Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:83c55716b48e62447bbe
Deposit or zone
Ming Deposit
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
3500000
Grade
1.7
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource provides high confidence for project planning with a good copper equivalent grade.

Positive factors

  • High confidence resource category
  • Good copper equivalent grade
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.7”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · copperTonnes: 53800000Grade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1041Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:17df5ffcf151713994eb
Deposit or zone
Ming Deposit
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
53800000
Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
1041
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource provides a strong basis for economic studies with significant copper tonnage and good grade.

Positive factors

  • Significant indicated resource tonnage
  • Good copper grade
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.9”

Context: 53.8

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · goldTonnes: 53800000Grade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 878Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:17df5ffcf151713994eb
Deposit or zone
Ming Deposit
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
53800000
Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
878
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource provides a strong basis for economic studies, with gold as a significant secondary commodity.

Positive factors

  • Significant indicated resource tonnage
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.5”

Context: 53.8

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · silverTonnes: 53800000Grade: 4.5Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 7707Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:17df5ffcf151713994eb
Deposit or zone
Ming Deposit
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
53800000
Grade
4.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
7707
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource provides a strong basis for economic studies, with silver as a significant secondary commodity.

Positive factors

  • Significant indicated resource tonnage
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“4.5”

Context: 53.8

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · copperTonnes: 53800000Grade: 2.5Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:17df5ffcf151713994eb
Deposit or zone
Ming Deposit
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
53800000
Grade
2.5
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource provides a strong basis for economic studies with a high copper equivalent grade.

Positive factors

  • Significant indicated resource tonnage
  • Good copper equivalent grade
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“2.5”

Context: 53.8

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · copperTonnes: 57300000Grade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1093Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:d35cc8217704d3216249
Deposit or zone
Ming Deposit
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
57300000
Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
1093
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured and Indicated resource provides a robust foundation for project development with significant copper tonnage.

Positive factors

  • Significant Measured and Indicated resource tonnage
  • Good copper grade
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.9”

Context: 57.3

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · goldTonnes: 57300000Grade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 899Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:d35cc8217704d3216249
Deposit or zone
Ming Deposit
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
57300000
Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
899
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured and Indicated resource provides a robust foundation for project development, with gold as a significant secondary commodity.

Positive factors

  • Significant Measured and Indicated resource tonnage
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.5”

Context: 57.3

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · silverTonnes: 57300000Grade: 4.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 7853Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:d35cc8217704d3216249
Deposit or zone
Ming Deposit
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
57300000
Grade
4.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
7853
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured and Indicated resource provides a robust foundation for project development, with silver as a significant secondary commodity.

Positive factors

  • Significant Measured and Indicated resource tonnage
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“4.3”

Context: 57.3

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · copperTonnes: 57300000Grade: 2.4Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:d35cc8217704d3216249
Deposit or zone
Ming Deposit
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
57300000
Grade
2.4
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured and Indicated resource provides a robust foundation for project development with a high copper equivalent grade.

Positive factors

  • Significant Measured and Indicated resource tonnage
  • Good copper equivalent grade
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“2.4”

Context: 57.3

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · copperTonnes: 17300000Grade: 2Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 344Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:eda4b3a7768975a28ce6
Deposit or zone
Ming Deposit
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
17300000
Grade
2
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
344
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource indicates potential for future growth but requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.

Positive factors

  • Good copper grade
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Negative factors

  • Lower confidence resource category

Evidence · table

“2.0”

Context: 17.3

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · goldTonnes: 17300000Grade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 404Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:eda4b3a7768975a28ce6
Deposit or zone
Ming Deposit
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
17300000
Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
404
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource indicates potential for future growth, with gold as a secondary commodity, but requires further drilling.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Negative factors

  • Lower confidence resource category

Evidence · table

“0.7”

Context: 17.3

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · silverTonnes: 17300000Grade: 6.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3522Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:eda4b3a7768975a28ce6
Deposit or zone
Ming Deposit
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
17300000
Grade
6.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
3522
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource indicates potential for future growth, with silver as a secondary commodity, but requires further drilling.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Negative factors

  • Lower confidence resource category

Evidence · table

“6.3”

Context: 17.3

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · copperTonnes: 17300000Grade: 2.8Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:eda4b3a7768975a28ce6
Deposit or zone
Ming Deposit
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
17300000
Grade
2.8
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource indicates potential for future growth with a high copper equivalent grade, but requires further drilling.

Positive factors

  • Good copper equivalent grade
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Negative factors

  • Lower confidence resource category

Evidence · table

“2.8”

Context: 17.3

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · copperTonnes: 2900000Grade: 2.1Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 62Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:4e19572cc173f535c73c
Deposit or zone
Little Deer

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
2900000
Grade
2.1
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
62
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-06-26

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for Little Deer is historical and requires an update to reflect current geological understanding and market conditions.

Positive factors

  • Good copper grade
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Negative factors

  • Stale estimate (effective date >2 years old)

Evidence · table

“2.1”

Context: 2.9

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

indicatedGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · goldTonnes: 2900000Grade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 9Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:4e19572cc173f535c73c
Deposit or zone
Little Deer

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
2900000
Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
9
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-06-26

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for Little Deer is historical and requires an update, with gold as a minor secondary commodity.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Negative factors

  • Stale estimate (effective date >2 years old)

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: 2.9

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

indicatedGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · silverTonnes: 2900000Grade: 3.4Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 320Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:4e19572cc173f535c73c
Deposit or zone
Little Deer

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
2900000
Grade
3.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
320
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-06-26

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for Little Deer is historical and requires an update, with silver as a minor secondary commodity.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Negative factors

  • Stale estimate (effective date >2 years old)

Evidence · table

“3.4”

Context: 2.9

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

indicatedGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · copperTonnes: 2900000Grade: 2.3Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:4e19572cc173f535c73c
Deposit or zone
Little Deer

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
2900000
Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-06-26

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for Little Deer is historical and requires an update to reflect current geological understanding and market conditions.

Positive factors

  • Good copper equivalent grade
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Negative factors

  • Stale estimate (effective date >2 years old)

Evidence · table

“2.3”

Context: 2.9

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

indicatedGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · copperTonnes: 2900000Grade: 2.1Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 62Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:4e19572cc173f535c73c
Deposit or zone
Little Deer

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
2900000
Grade
2.1
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
62
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-06-26

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured and Indicated resource for Little Deer is historical and requires an update to reflect current geological understanding and market conditions.

Positive factors

  • Good copper grade
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Negative factors

  • Stale estimate (effective date >2 years old)

Evidence · table

“2.1”

Context: 2.9

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

indicatedGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · goldTonnes: 2900000Grade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 9Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:4e19572cc173f535c73c
Deposit or zone
Little Deer

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
2900000
Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
9
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-06-26

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured and Indicated resource for Little Deer is historical and requires an update, with gold as a minor secondary commodity.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Negative factors

  • Stale estimate (effective date >2 years old)

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: 2.9

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

indicatedGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · silverTonnes: 2900000Grade: 3.4Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 320Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:4e19572cc173f535c73c
Deposit or zone
Little Deer

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
2900000
Grade
3.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
320
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-06-26

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured and Indicated resource for Little Deer is historical and requires an update, with silver as a minor secondary commodity.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Negative factors

  • Stale estimate (effective date >2 years old)

Evidence · table

“3.4”

Context: 2.9

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

indicatedGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · copperTonnes: 2900000Grade: 2.3Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:4e19572cc173f535c73c
Deposit or zone
Little Deer

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
2900000
Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-06-26

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured and Indicated resource for Little Deer is historical and requires an update to reflect current geological understanding and market conditions.

Positive factors

  • Good copper equivalent grade
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Negative factors

  • Stale estimate (effective date >2 years old)

Evidence · table

“2.3”

Context: 2.9

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

inferredGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · copperTonnes: 6200000Grade: 1.8Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 110Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:d1890ced604198b53ff8
Deposit or zone
Little Deer

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
6200000
Grade
1.8
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
110
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-06-26

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for Little Deer is historical and requires further drilling and an update to improve confidence.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Negative factors

  • Lower confidence resource category
  • Stale estimate (effective date >2 years old)

Evidence · table

“1.8”

Context: 6.2

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

inferredGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · goldTonnes: 6200000Grade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 10Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:d1890ced604198b53ff8
Deposit or zone
Little Deer

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
6200000
Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
10
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-06-26

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for Little Deer is historical and requires further drilling and an update, with gold as a minor secondary commodity.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Negative factors

  • Lower confidence resource category
  • Stale estimate (effective date >2 years old)

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: 6.2

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

inferredGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · silverTonnes: 6200000Grade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 430Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:d1890ced604198b53ff8
Deposit or zone
Little Deer

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
6200000
Grade
2.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
430
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-06-26

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for Little Deer is historical and requires further drilling and an update, with silver as a minor secondary commodity.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Negative factors

  • Lower confidence resource category
  • Stale estimate (effective date >2 years old)

Evidence · table

“2.2”

Context: 6.2

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

inferredGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · copperTonnes: 6200000Grade: 1.8Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:d1890ced604198b53ff8
Deposit or zone
Little Deer

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
6200000
Grade
1.8
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-06-26

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for Little Deer is historical and requires further drilling and an update to improve confidence.

Positive factors

  • Good copper equivalent grade
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Negative factors

  • Lower confidence resource category
  • Stale estimate (effective date >2 years old)

Evidence · table

“1.8”

Context: 6.2

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

measuredGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · copperTonnes: 3500000Grade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 52Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:6587afeb838c45854c33
Deposit or zone
GREEN BAY TOTAL
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
3500000
Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
52
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource for the overall Green Bay Project provides high confidence for project planning with a good copper grade.

Positive factors

  • High confidence resource category
  • Good copper grade
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.5”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · goldTonnes: 3500000Grade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 20Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:6587afeb838c45854c33
Deposit or zone
GREEN BAY TOTAL
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
3500000
Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
20
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource for the overall Green Bay Project provides high confidence for project planning, with gold as a secondary commodity.

Positive factors

  • High confidence resource category
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · silverTonnes: 3500000Grade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 147Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:6587afeb838c45854c33
Deposit or zone
GREEN BAY TOTAL
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
3500000
Grade
1.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
147
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource for the overall Green Bay Project provides high confidence for project planning, with silver as a secondary commodity.

Positive factors

  • High confidence resource category
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.3”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · copperTonnes: 3500000Grade: 1.7Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:6587afeb838c45854c33
Deposit or zone
GREEN BAY TOTAL
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
3500000
Grade
1.7
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource for the overall Green Bay Project provides high confidence for project planning with a good copper equivalent grade.

Positive factors

  • High confidence resource category
  • Good copper equivalent grade
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.7”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · copperTonnes: 56700000Grade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1103Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:841f7cd2903909377272
Deposit or zone
GREEN BAY TOTAL
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
56700000
Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
1103
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for the overall Green Bay Project provides a strong basis for economic studies with significant copper tonnage and good grade.

Positive factors

  • Significant indicated resource tonnage
  • Good copper grade
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.9”

Context: 56.7

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · goldTonnes: 56700000Grade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 887Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:841f7cd2903909377272
Deposit or zone
GREEN BAY TOTAL
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
56700000
Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
887
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for the overall Green Bay Project provides a strong basis for economic studies, with gold as a significant secondary commodity.

Positive factors

  • Significant indicated resource tonnage
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.5”

Context: 56.7

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · silverTonnes: 56700000Grade: 4.4Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 8027Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:841f7cd2903909377272
Deposit or zone
GREEN BAY TOTAL
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
56700000
Grade
4.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
8027
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for the overall Green Bay Project provides a strong basis for economic studies, with silver as a significant secondary commodity.

Positive factors

  • Significant indicated resource tonnage
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“4.4”

Context: 56.7

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · copperTonnes: 56700000Grade: 2.5Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:841f7cd2903909377272
Deposit or zone
GREEN BAY TOTAL
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
56700000
Grade
2.5
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for the overall Green Bay Project provides a strong basis for economic studies with a high copper equivalent grade.

Positive factors

  • Significant indicated resource tonnage
  • Good copper equivalent grade
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“2.5”

Context: 56.7

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · copperTonnes: 60200000Grade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1155Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:65f1e20595a3a58149cf
Deposit or zone
GREEN BAY TOTAL
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
60200000
Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
1155
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured and Indicated resource for the overall Green Bay Project provides a robust foundation for project development with significant copper tonnage.

Positive factors

  • Significant Measured and Indicated resource tonnage
  • Good copper grade
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.9”

Context: 60.2

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · goldTonnes: 60200000Grade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 908Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:65f1e20595a3a58149cf
Deposit or zone
GREEN BAY TOTAL
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
60200000
Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
908
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured and Indicated resource for the overall Green Bay Project provides a robust foundation for project development, with gold as a significant secondary commodity.

Positive factors

  • Significant Measured and Indicated resource tonnage
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.5”

Context: 60.2

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · silverTonnes: 60200000Grade: 4.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 8173Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:65f1e20595a3a58149cf
Deposit or zone
GREEN BAY TOTAL
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
60200000
Grade
4.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
8173
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured and Indicated resource for the overall Green Bay Project provides a robust foundation for project development, with silver as a significant secondary commodity.

Positive factors

  • Significant Measured and Indicated resource tonnage
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“4.2”

Context: 60.2

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · copperTonnes: 60200000Grade: 2.4Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:65f1e20595a3a58149cf
Deposit or zone
GREEN BAY TOTAL
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
60200000
Grade
2.4
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured and Indicated resource for the overall Green Bay Project provides a robust foundation for project development with a high copper equivalent grade.

Positive factors

  • Significant Measured and Indicated resource tonnage
  • Good copper equivalent grade
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“2.4”

Context: 60.2

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · copperTonnes: 23500000Grade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 454Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:83a58a9a89d58f3e1d49
Deposit or zone
GREEN BAY TOTAL
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
23500000
Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
454
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for the overall Green Bay Project indicates potential for future growth but requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.

Positive factors

  • Good copper grade
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Negative factors

  • Lower confidence resource category

Evidence · table

“1.9”

Context: 23.5

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · goldTonnes: 23500000Grade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 414Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:83a58a9a89d58f3e1d49
Deposit or zone
GREEN BAY TOTAL
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
23500000
Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
414
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for the overall Green Bay Project indicates potential for future growth, with gold as a secondary commodity, but requires further drilling.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Negative factors

  • Lower confidence resource category

Evidence · table

“0.6”

Context: 23.5

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · silverTonnes: 23500000Grade: 5.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3952Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:83a58a9a89d58f3e1d49
Deposit or zone
GREEN BAY TOTAL
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
23500000
Grade
5.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
3952
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for the overall Green Bay Project indicates potential for future growth, with silver as a secondary commodity, but requires further drilling.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Negative factors

  • Lower confidence resource category

Evidence · table

“5.2”

Context: 23.5

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredGreen Bay Copper-Gold Project · copperTonnes: 23500000Grade: 2.5Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nl
Reported Region
Newfoundland, Canada
Ticker
FFM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Juan Gutierrez
Resource group id
resource:83a58a9a89d58f3e1d49
Deposit or zone
GREEN BAY TOTAL
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
23500000
Grade
2.5
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% Cu

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-07-01

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for the overall Green Bay Project indicates potential for future growth with a high copper equivalent grade, but requires further drilling.

Positive factors

  • Good copper equivalent grade
  • QP/CP signed
  • JORC and NI 43-101 compliant
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Cut-off grade disclosed

Negative factors

  • Lower confidence resource category

Evidence · table

“2.5”

Context: 23.5

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.