# FireFly announces successful A$190m capital raising to fund development and resource growth

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054

Original source: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/08/26/3351065/0/en/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-resource-growth.html

Publisher: globenewswire

Original announcement: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: FireFly Metals Ltd

- Ticker: FFM

- Exchange: Unavailable

- Region: Newfoundland, Canada

- Primary commodity: Copper

- Secondary commodities: Gold, Silver

- Document categories: Resource update, Capital raise

- Extracted: 2026-09-12 01:52:50 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.80 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

FireFly Metals Ltd successfully completed a A$190 million capital raise, strongly supported by institutional investors, to fund the development and resource growth of its Green Bay Copper-Gold Project. The funds will advance early works, long-lead items, and feasibility studies, alongside an aggressive exploration program. The project is underpinned by a significant 60.2 Mt Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource at 1.9% copper and 0.5 g/t gold, with disclosed metal equivalent assumptions.

Reasoning: FireFly Metals successfully raised A$190 million to advance its Green Bay Copper-Gold Project, supported by a robust and compliant resource estimate, indicating strong market confidence and clear development pathway.

- Positive factor: Successful capital raise with strong institutional support

- Positive factor: Funds allocated for project development and resource growth

- Positive factor: Significant Measured and Indicated resource base for Green Bay Project

- Positive factor: Resource estimate compliant with JORC and NI 43-101 standards

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions and cut-off grade clearly disclosed

- Negative factor: Little Deer resource estimate is stale, effective date over two years old

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 47

## Classification and evidence

**Capital Raise**

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The document announces a successful A$190m capital raising.

Evidence · text

> FireFly announces successful A$190m capital raising

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The document includes detailed Mineral Resource Estimates for the Green Bay Copper-Gold Project.

Evidence · text

> Mineral Resource Estimate – Green Bay Project

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The Mineral Resource Estimates are prepared and reported in accordance with the JORC Code 2012.

Evidence · text

> JORC Code \(2012 Edition\)

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The Mineral Resource Estimates are prepared and reported in accordance with Canadian National Instrument 43-101.

Evidence · text

> Canadian National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects \( NI 43-101 \)

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Mr Juan Gutierrez, Group Chief Geologist, is named as a Competent Person and Qualified Person responsible for the technical information.

Evidence · text

> Mr Juan Gutierrez BSc, Geology \(Masters\), Geostatistics \(Postgraduate Diploma\), who is a Member and Chartered Professional of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Gutierrez is a Competent Person as defined in the JORC Code 2012 and a Qualified Person as defined in NI 43-101.

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: Mineral Resources have been reported at a 1.0% copper cut-off grade.

Evidence · text

> Mineral Resources have been reported at a 1.0% copper cut-off grade.

**Metal Equivalent Opaque**

Polarity: negative

Story-specific tag

Definition: Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: Metal equivalent assumptions are clearly disclosed, including commodity prices and metallurgical recoveries.

Evidence · text

> Metal equivalents for the Mineral Resource Estimates have been calculated at a copper price of US$10,626/t, gold price of US$3,587/oz and silver price of US$50.22/oz. Individual Mineral Resource grades for the metals are set out in Appendix A of this announcement. Metallurgical factors have been applied to the metal equivalent calculation. Copper recovery used was 95%. Historical production at the Ming Mine has a documented copper recovery of ~96%. Precious metal \(gold and silver\) metallurgical recovery was assumed at 85% on the basis of historical recoveries achieved at the Ming Mine in addition to historical metallurgical test work to increase precious metal recoveries.

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: The Little Deer Mineral Resource Estimate has an effective date of 26 June 2024, making it over two years old in the context of this August 2026 announcement.

Evidence · text

> with an effective date of 26 June 2024

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 44. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (44)

### measured

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-3)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:83c55716b48e62447bbe
- Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: measured
- Tonnes: 3500000
- Grade: 1.5
- Grade Unit: %
- Contained Metal: 52
- Contained Unit: kt
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource provides high confidence for project planning with a good copper grade.

- Positive factor: High confidence resource category

- Positive factor: Good copper grade

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 1.5

Context: 3.5

#### Tags used in scoring

**Measured Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### measured

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-4)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:83c55716b48e62447bbe
- Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: measured
- Tonnes: 3500000
- Grade: 0.2
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 20
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource provides high confidence for project planning, with gold as a secondary commodity.

- Positive factor: High confidence resource category

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 0.2

Context: 3.5

#### Tags used in scoring

**Measured Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### measured

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-5)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · silver

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:83c55716b48e62447bbe
- Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: measured
- Tonnes: 3500000
- Grade: 1.3
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 147
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource provides high confidence for project planning, with silver as a secondary commodity.

- Positive factor: High confidence resource category

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 1.3

Context: 3.5

#### Tags used in scoring

**Measured Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### measured

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-6)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:83c55716b48e62447bbe
- Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: measured
- Tonnes: 3500000
- Grade: 1.7
- Grade Unit: %
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource provides high confidence for project planning with a good copper equivalent grade.

- Positive factor: High confidence resource category

- Positive factor: Good copper equivalent grade

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 1.7

Context: 3.5

#### Tags used in scoring

**Measured Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-7)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:17df5ffcf151713994eb
- Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 53800000
- Grade: 1.9
- Grade Unit: %
- Contained Metal: 1041
- Contained Unit: kt
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource provides a strong basis for economic studies with significant copper tonnage and good grade.

- Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage

- Positive factor: Good copper grade

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 1.9

Context: 53.8

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-8)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:17df5ffcf151713994eb
- Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 53800000
- Grade: 0.5
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 878
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource provides a strong basis for economic studies, with gold as a significant secondary commodity.

- Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 0.5

Context: 53.8

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-9)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · silver

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:17df5ffcf151713994eb
- Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 53800000
- Grade: 4.5
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 7707
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource provides a strong basis for economic studies, with silver as a significant secondary commodity.

- Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 4.5

Context: 53.8

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-10)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:17df5ffcf151713994eb
- Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 53800000
- Grade: 2.5
- Grade Unit: %
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource provides a strong basis for economic studies with a high copper equivalent grade.

- Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage

- Positive factor: Good copper equivalent grade

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 2.5

Context: 53.8

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-11)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:d35cc8217704d3216249
- Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 57300000
- Grade: 1.9
- Grade Unit: %
- Contained Metal: 1093
- Contained Unit: kt
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured and Indicated resource provides a robust foundation for project development with significant copper tonnage.

- Positive factor: Significant Measured and Indicated resource tonnage

- Positive factor: Good copper grade

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 1.9

Context: 57.3

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-12)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:d35cc8217704d3216249
- Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 57300000
- Grade: 0.5
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 899
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured and Indicated resource provides a robust foundation for project development, with gold as a significant secondary commodity.

- Positive factor: Significant Measured and Indicated resource tonnage

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 0.5

Context: 57.3

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-13)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · silver

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:d35cc8217704d3216249
- Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 57300000
- Grade: 4.3
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 7853
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured and Indicated resource provides a robust foundation for project development, with silver as a significant secondary commodity.

- Positive factor: Significant Measured and Indicated resource tonnage

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 4.3

Context: 57.3

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-14)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:d35cc8217704d3216249
- Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 57300000
- Grade: 2.4
- Grade Unit: %
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured and Indicated resource provides a robust foundation for project development with a high copper equivalent grade.

- Positive factor: Significant Measured and Indicated resource tonnage

- Positive factor: Good copper equivalent grade

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 2.4

Context: 57.3

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-15)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:eda4b3a7768975a28ce6
- Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 17300000
- Grade: 2
- Grade Unit: %
- Contained Metal: 344
- Contained Unit: kt
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource indicates potential for future growth but requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.

- Positive factor: Good copper grade

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

- Negative factor: Lower confidence resource category

Evidence · table

> 2.0

Context: 17.3

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-16)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:eda4b3a7768975a28ce6
- Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 17300000
- Grade: 0.7
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 404
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource indicates potential for future growth, with gold as a secondary commodity, but requires further drilling.

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

- Negative factor: Lower confidence resource category

Evidence · table

> 0.7

Context: 17.3

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-17)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · silver

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:eda4b3a7768975a28ce6
- Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 17300000
- Grade: 6.3
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 3522
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource indicates potential for future growth, with silver as a secondary commodity, but requires further drilling.

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

- Negative factor: Lower confidence resource category

Evidence · table

> 6.3

Context: 17.3

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-18)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:eda4b3a7768975a28ce6
- Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 17300000
- Grade: 2.8
- Grade Unit: %
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource indicates potential for future growth with a high copper equivalent grade, but requires further drilling.

- Positive factor: Good copper equivalent grade

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

- Negative factor: Lower confidence resource category

Evidence · table

> 2.8

Context: 17.3

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-19)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:4e19572cc173f535c73c
- Deposit or zone: Little Deer

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 2900000
- Grade: 2.1
- Grade Unit: %
- Contained Metal: 62
- Contained Unit: kt
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2024-06-26

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for Little Deer is historical and requires an update to reflect current geological understanding and market conditions.

- Positive factor: Good copper grade

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

- Negative factor: Stale estimate \(effective date &gt;2 years old\)

Evidence · table

> 2.1

Context: 2.9

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-20)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:4e19572cc173f535c73c
- Deposit or zone: Little Deer

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 2900000
- Grade: 0.1
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 9
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2024-06-26

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for Little Deer is historical and requires an update, with gold as a minor secondary commodity.

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

- Negative factor: Stale estimate \(effective date &gt;2 years old\)

Evidence · table

> 0.1

Context: 2.9

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-21)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:4e19572cc173f535c73c
- Deposit or zone: Little Deer

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 2900000
- Grade: 3.4
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 320
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2024-06-26

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for Little Deer is historical and requires an update, with silver as a minor secondary commodity.

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

- Negative factor: Stale estimate \(effective date &gt;2 years old\)

Evidence · table

> 3.4

Context: 2.9

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-22)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:4e19572cc173f535c73c
- Deposit or zone: Little Deer

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 2900000
- Grade: 2.3
- Grade Unit: %
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2024-06-26

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for Little Deer is historical and requires an update to reflect current geological understanding and market conditions.

- Positive factor: Good copper equivalent grade

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

- Negative factor: Stale estimate \(effective date &gt;2 years old\)

Evidence · table

> 2.3

Context: 2.9

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-23)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:4e19572cc173f535c73c
- Deposit or zone: Little Deer

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 2900000
- Grade: 2.1
- Grade Unit: %
- Contained Metal: 62
- Contained Unit: kt
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2024-06-26

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured and Indicated resource for Little Deer is historical and requires an update to reflect current geological understanding and market conditions.

- Positive factor: Good copper grade

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

- Negative factor: Stale estimate \(effective date &gt;2 years old\)

Evidence · table

> 2.1

Context: 2.9

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-24)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:4e19572cc173f535c73c
- Deposit or zone: Little Deer

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 2900000
- Grade: 0.1
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 9
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2024-06-26

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured and Indicated resource for Little Deer is historical and requires an update, with gold as a minor secondary commodity.

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

- Negative factor: Stale estimate \(effective date &gt;2 years old\)

Evidence · table

> 0.1

Context: 2.9

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-25)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:4e19572cc173f535c73c
- Deposit or zone: Little Deer

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 2900000
- Grade: 3.4
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 320
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2024-06-26

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured and Indicated resource for Little Deer is historical and requires an update, with silver as a minor secondary commodity.

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

- Negative factor: Stale estimate \(effective date &gt;2 years old\)

Evidence · table

> 3.4

Context: 2.9

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-26)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:4e19572cc173f535c73c
- Deposit or zone: Little Deer

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 2900000
- Grade: 2.3
- Grade Unit: %
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2024-06-26

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured and Indicated resource for Little Deer is historical and requires an update to reflect current geological understanding and market conditions.

- Positive factor: Good copper equivalent grade

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

- Negative factor: Stale estimate \(effective date &gt;2 years old\)

Evidence · table

> 2.3

Context: 2.9

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-27)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:d1890ced604198b53ff8
- Deposit or zone: Little Deer

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 6200000
- Grade: 1.8
- Grade Unit: %
- Contained Metal: 110
- Contained Unit: kt
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2024-06-26

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for Little Deer is historical and requires further drilling and an update to improve confidence.

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

- Negative factor: Lower confidence resource category

- Negative factor: Stale estimate \(effective date &gt;2 years old\)

Evidence · table

> 1.8

Context: 6.2

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-28)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:d1890ced604198b53ff8
- Deposit or zone: Little Deer

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 6200000
- Grade: 0.1
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 10
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2024-06-26

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for Little Deer is historical and requires further drilling and an update, with gold as a minor secondary commodity.

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

- Negative factor: Lower confidence resource category

- Negative factor: Stale estimate \(effective date &gt;2 years old\)

Evidence · table

> 0.1

Context: 6.2

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-29)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:d1890ced604198b53ff8
- Deposit or zone: Little Deer

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 6200000
- Grade: 2.2
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 430
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2024-06-26

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for Little Deer is historical and requires further drilling and an update, with silver as a minor secondary commodity.

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

- Negative factor: Lower confidence resource category

- Negative factor: Stale estimate \(effective date &gt;2 years old\)

Evidence · table

> 2.2

Context: 6.2

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-30)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:d1890ced604198b53ff8
- Deposit or zone: Little Deer

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 6200000
- Grade: 1.8
- Grade Unit: %
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2024-06-26

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for Little Deer is historical and requires further drilling and an update to improve confidence.

- Positive factor: Good copper equivalent grade

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

- Negative factor: Lower confidence resource category

- Negative factor: Stale estimate \(effective date &gt;2 years old\)

Evidence · table

> 1.8

Context: 6.2

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

### measured

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-31)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:6587afeb838c45854c33
- Deposit or zone: GREEN BAY TOTAL
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: measured
- Tonnes: 3500000
- Grade: 1.5
- Grade Unit: %
- Contained Metal: 52
- Contained Unit: kt
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource for the overall Green Bay Project provides high confidence for project planning with a good copper grade.

- Positive factor: High confidence resource category

- Positive factor: Good copper grade

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 1.5

Context: 3.5

#### Tags used in scoring

**Measured Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### measured

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-32)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:6587afeb838c45854c33
- Deposit or zone: GREEN BAY TOTAL
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: measured
- Tonnes: 3500000
- Grade: 0.2
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 20
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource for the overall Green Bay Project provides high confidence for project planning, with gold as a secondary commodity.

- Positive factor: High confidence resource category

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 0.2

Context: 3.5

#### Tags used in scoring

**Measured Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### measured

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-33)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · silver

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:6587afeb838c45854c33
- Deposit or zone: GREEN BAY TOTAL
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: measured
- Tonnes: 3500000
- Grade: 1.3
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 147
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource for the overall Green Bay Project provides high confidence for project planning, with silver as a secondary commodity.

- Positive factor: High confidence resource category

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 1.3

Context: 3.5

#### Tags used in scoring

**Measured Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### measured

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-34)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:6587afeb838c45854c33
- Deposit or zone: GREEN BAY TOTAL
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: measured
- Tonnes: 3500000
- Grade: 1.7
- Grade Unit: %
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource for the overall Green Bay Project provides high confidence for project planning with a good copper equivalent grade.

- Positive factor: High confidence resource category

- Positive factor: Good copper equivalent grade

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 1.7

Context: 3.5

#### Tags used in scoring

**Measured Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-35)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:841f7cd2903909377272
- Deposit or zone: GREEN BAY TOTAL
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 56700000
- Grade: 1.9
- Grade Unit: %
- Contained Metal: 1103
- Contained Unit: kt
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for the overall Green Bay Project provides a strong basis for economic studies with significant copper tonnage and good grade.

- Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage

- Positive factor: Good copper grade

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 1.9

Context: 56.7

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-36)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:841f7cd2903909377272
- Deposit or zone: GREEN BAY TOTAL
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 56700000
- Grade: 0.5
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 887
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for the overall Green Bay Project provides a strong basis for economic studies, with gold as a significant secondary commodity.

- Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 0.5

Context: 56.7

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-37)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · silver

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:841f7cd2903909377272
- Deposit or zone: GREEN BAY TOTAL
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 56700000
- Grade: 4.4
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 8027
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for the overall Green Bay Project provides a strong basis for economic studies, with silver as a significant secondary commodity.

- Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 4.4

Context: 56.7

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-38)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:841f7cd2903909377272
- Deposit or zone: GREEN BAY TOTAL
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 56700000
- Grade: 2.5
- Grade Unit: %
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for the overall Green Bay Project provides a strong basis for economic studies with a high copper equivalent grade.

- Positive factor: Significant indicated resource tonnage

- Positive factor: Good copper equivalent grade

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 2.5

Context: 56.7

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-39)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:65f1e20595a3a58149cf
- Deposit or zone: GREEN BAY TOTAL
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 60200000
- Grade: 1.9
- Grade Unit: %
- Contained Metal: 1155
- Contained Unit: kt
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured and Indicated resource for the overall Green Bay Project provides a robust foundation for project development with significant copper tonnage.

- Positive factor: Significant Measured and Indicated resource tonnage

- Positive factor: Good copper grade

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 1.9

Context: 60.2

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-40)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:65f1e20595a3a58149cf
- Deposit or zone: GREEN BAY TOTAL
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 60200000
- Grade: 0.5
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 908
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured and Indicated resource for the overall Green Bay Project provides a robust foundation for project development, with gold as a significant secondary commodity.

- Positive factor: Significant Measured and Indicated resource tonnage

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 0.5

Context: 60.2

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-41)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · silver

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:65f1e20595a3a58149cf
- Deposit or zone: GREEN BAY TOTAL
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 60200000
- Grade: 4.2
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 8173
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured and Indicated resource for the overall Green Bay Project provides a robust foundation for project development, with silver as a significant secondary commodity.

- Positive factor: Significant Measured and Indicated resource tonnage

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 4.2

Context: 60.2

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-42)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:65f1e20595a3a58149cf
- Deposit or zone: GREEN BAY TOTAL
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 60200000
- Grade: 2.4
- Grade Unit: %
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Measured and Indicated resource for the overall Green Bay Project provides a robust foundation for project development with a high copper equivalent grade.

- Positive factor: Significant Measured and Indicated resource tonnage

- Positive factor: Good copper equivalent grade

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 2.4

Context: 60.2

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-43)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:83a58a9a89d58f3e1d49
- Deposit or zone: GREEN BAY TOTAL
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 23500000
- Grade: 1.9
- Grade Unit: %
- Contained Metal: 454
- Contained Unit: kt
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for the overall Green Bay Project indicates potential for future growth but requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.

- Positive factor: Good copper grade

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

- Negative factor: Lower confidence resource category

Evidence · table

> 1.9

Context: 23.5

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-44)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:83a58a9a89d58f3e1d49
- Deposit or zone: GREEN BAY TOTAL
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 23500000
- Grade: 0.6
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 414
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for the overall Green Bay Project indicates potential for future growth, with gold as a secondary commodity, but requires further drilling.

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

- Negative factor: Lower confidence resource category

Evidence · table

> 0.6

Context: 23.5

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-45)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · silver

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:83a58a9a89d58f3e1d49
- Deposit or zone: GREEN BAY TOTAL
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 23500000
- Grade: 5.2
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 3952
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for the overall Green Bay Project indicates potential for future growth, with silver as a secondary commodity, but requires further drilling.

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

- Negative factor: Lower confidence resource category

Evidence · table

> 5.2

Context: 23.5

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-announces-successful-a-190m-capital-raising-to-fund-development-and-reso--203013a8-00a3-4960-8bc9-89a4b3faf054#fact-resource-facts-46)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez
- Resource group id: resource:83a58a9a89d58f3e1d49
- Deposit or zone: GREEN BAY TOTAL
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 23500000
- Grade: 2.5
- Grade Unit: %
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % Cu

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-07-01

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for the overall Green Bay Project indicates potential for future growth with a high copper equivalent grade, but requires further drilling.

- Positive factor: Good copper equivalent grade

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed

- Positive factor: JORC and NI 43-101 compliant

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Positive factor: Cut-off grade disclosed

- Negative factor: Lower confidence resource category

Evidence · table

> 2.5

Context: 23.5

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
