# FireFly Completes Equity Raising Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-completes-equity-raising--42ce7cbd-3586-4c40-af45-aa1b912f0a7e Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/FFM/news/6702981151815250/firefly-completes-equity-raising Publisher: tmx Original announcement: 2026-09-03T12:23:53.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: Unknown date Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date - Company: FireFly Metals Ltd - Ticker: FFM - Exchange: TSX - Region: Newfoundland, Canada - Primary commodity: Copper - Secondary commodities: Gold, Silver - Document categories: Resource update, Capital raise - Extracted: 2026-09-12 01:07:51 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.80 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary FireFly Metals Ltd has successfully completed an equity raising totaling approximately A$180 million through an institutional placement and a bought deal offering. The company also plans a Share Purchase Plan to raise up to an additional A$10 million. Proceeds will primarily fund the Green Bay Copper-Gold Project's development, including underground works, drilling, technical studies, and corporate costs, supported by the project's substantial existing mineral resource estimate. Reasoning: FireFly Metals has successfully completed a significant equity raising of A$180M, providing substantial funding for the Green Bay Copper-Gold Project's development, including DFS and early works. The document also re-states the project's substantial JORC/NI 43-101 compliant resource estimate, which underpins the project's value, although this resource data itself is not new information in this announcement. - Positive factor: Successful completion of significant equity raise - Positive factor: Funds secured for project development and DFS - Positive factor: Strong balance sheet for project financing - Positive factor: Resource estimate underpins project value - Negative factor: Resource estimate is a re-statement, not new information in this release Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source. Facts used in scoring: 28 ## Classification and evidence **Equity Raise Completed** Polarity: positive Story-specific tag Definition: No canonical definition is currently available. Why it applies: The company announced the completion of its institutional placement and bought deal offering, raising ~A$180M. Evidence · text > FireFly is pleased to announce that it has completed the equity raising announced on 25 and 26 August 2026 **SPP Announced** Polarity: neutral Story-specific tag Definition: No canonical definition is currently available. Why it applies: FireFly intends to offer a non-underwritten share purchase plan to eligible shareholders to raise up to A$10 million. Evidence · text > FireFly intends to offer to eligible shareholders ... the opportunity to participate in a non-underwritten share purchase plan \( SPP \) and subscribe for a maximum of A$30,000 worth of new fully paid Ordinary Shares **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: The Green Bay Copper-Gold Project's Mineral Resources are prepared and disclosed in accordance with the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves \(JORC Code \(2012 Edition\)\). Evidence · text > prepared and disclosed in accordance with the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves \( JORC Code \(2012 Edition\) \) **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: The Green Bay Copper-Gold Project's Mineral Resources are prepared and disclosed in accordance with Canadian National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects \(NI 43-101\). Evidence · text > and Canadian National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects \( NI 43-101 \) **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: Mr Juan Gutierrez, Group Chief Geologist, is named as a Competent Person under JORC and a Qualified Person under NI 43-101, and has reviewed and approved the technical information. Evidence · text > All technical and scientific information in this announcement has been reviewed and approved by Group Chief Geologist, Mr Juan Gutierrez ... Mr Gutierrez is a Competent Person as defined in the JORC Code \(2012 Edition\) and a Qualified Person as defined in NI 43-101. **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: Mineral Resources have been reported at a 1.0% copper cut-off grade. Evidence · text > Mineral Resources have been reported at a 1.0% copper cut-off grade. **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: The resource estimate presented in this document was first reported in a prior announcement dated 25 August 2026 \(for Green Bay Total/Ming\) and 29 October 2024 \(for Little Deer\), indicating it is not new information in this release. Evidence · text > The Mineral Resource Estimate for the Green Bay Copper-Gold Project referred to in this announcement ... was first reported in the Company’s ASX announcement dated 25 August 2026 ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 24. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Resource Estimates (24) ### measured [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-completes-equity-raising--42ce7cbd-3586-4c40-af45-aa1b912f0a7e#fact-resource-facts-4) Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_nl - Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada - Ticker: FFM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez - Resource group id: resource:4d151c7129a206a97483 - Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit #### Resource Data - Category: measured - Tonnes: 3500000 - Grade: 1.5 - Grade Unit: % - Contained Metal: 52 - Contained Unit: kt - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % copper #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-08-25 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 1.7 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-03T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The re-stated Measured resource for copper at Ming Deposit provides high-confidence tonnage and grade, underpinning project value, though the data itself is not new in this announcement. - Positive factor: High confidence Measured category - Positive factor: Good copper grade - Negative factor: Resource data is re-stated, not new Evidence · table > 1.5 Context: 3.5 #### Tags used in scoring **Measured Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves. Why it applies: category is "measured" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### measured [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-completes-equity-raising--42ce7cbd-3586-4c40-af45-aa1b912f0a7e#fact-resource-facts-5) Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_nl - Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada - Ticker: FFM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez - Resource group id: resource:4d151c7129a206a97483 - Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit #### Resource Data - Category: measured - Tonnes: 3500000 - Grade: 0.2 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 20 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % copper #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-08-25 #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-03T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The re-stated Measured resource for gold at Ming Deposit contributes to the overall project value, though the data itself is not new in this announcement. - Positive factor: High confidence Measured category - Negative factor: Resource data is re-stated, not new Evidence · table > 0.2 Context: 3.5 #### Tags used in scoring **Measured Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves. Why it applies: category is "measured" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### measured [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-completes-equity-raising--42ce7cbd-3586-4c40-af45-aa1b912f0a7e#fact-resource-facts-6) Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_nl - Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada - Ticker: FFM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez - Resource group id: resource:4d151c7129a206a97483 - Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit #### Resource Data - Category: measured - Tonnes: 3500000 - Grade: 1.3 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 147 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % copper #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-08-25 #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-03T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The re-stated Measured resource for silver at Ming Deposit adds to the polymetallic nature of the project, though the data itself is not new in this announcement. - Positive factor: High confidence Measured category - Negative factor: Resource data is re-stated, not new Evidence · table > 1.3 Context: 3.5 #### Tags used in scoring **Measured Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves. Why it applies: category is "measured" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-completes-equity-raising--42ce7cbd-3586-4c40-af45-aa1b912f0a7e#fact-resource-facts-7) Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_nl - Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada - Ticker: FFM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez - Resource group id: resource:fd9c5dc28f1f62a5680f - Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 53800000 - Grade: 1.9 - Grade Unit: % - Contained Metal: 1041 - Contained Unit: kt - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % copper #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-08-25 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.5 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-03T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The re-stated Indicated resource for copper at Ming Deposit represents a significant portion of the project's value, providing a strong base for future studies, though the data itself is not new in this announcement. - Positive factor: Large Indicated tonnage - Positive factor: Good copper grade - Negative factor: Resource data is re-stated, not new Evidence · table > 1.9 Context: 53.8 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-completes-equity-raising--42ce7cbd-3586-4c40-af45-aa1b912f0a7e#fact-resource-facts-8) Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_nl - Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada - Ticker: FFM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez - Resource group id: resource:fd9c5dc28f1f62a5680f - Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 53800000 - Grade: 0.5 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 878 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % copper #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-08-25 #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-03T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The re-stated Indicated resource for gold at Ming Deposit significantly contributes to the project's overall contained metal, though the data itself is not new in this announcement. - Positive factor: Large Indicated tonnage - Negative factor: Resource data is re-stated, not new Evidence · table > 0.5 Context: 53.8 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-completes-equity-raising--42ce7cbd-3586-4c40-af45-aa1b912f0a7e#fact-resource-facts-9) Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_nl - Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada - Ticker: FFM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez - Resource group id: resource:fd9c5dc28f1f62a5680f - Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 53800000 - Grade: 4.5 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 7707 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % copper #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-08-25 #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-03T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The re-stated Indicated resource for silver at Ming Deposit adds significant byproduct potential to the project, though the data itself is not new in this announcement. - Positive factor: Large Indicated tonnage - Positive factor: Good silver grade - Negative factor: Resource data is re-stated, not new Evidence · table > 4.5 Context: 53.8 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-completes-equity-raising--42ce7cbd-3586-4c40-af45-aa1b912f0a7e#fact-resource-facts-10) Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_nl - Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada - Ticker: FFM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez - Resource group id: resource:450ec92f8ceba87c1418 - Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 17300000 - Grade: 2 - Grade Unit: % - Contained Metal: 344 - Contained Unit: kt - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % copper #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-08-25 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.8 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-03T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The re-stated Inferred resource for copper at Ming Deposit indicates significant exploration upside and potential for future conversion, though the data itself is not new in this announcement. - Positive factor: Good copper grade - Positive factor: Potential for resource growth - Negative factor: Resource data is re-stated, not new - Negative factor: Lower confidence Inferred category Evidence · table > 2.0 Context: 17.3 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-completes-equity-raising--42ce7cbd-3586-4c40-af45-aa1b912f0a7e#fact-resource-facts-11) Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_nl - Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada - Ticker: FFM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez - Resource group id: resource:450ec92f8ceba87c1418 - Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 17300000 - Grade: 0.7 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 404 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % copper #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-08-25 #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-03T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The re-stated Inferred resource for gold at Ming Deposit adds to the project's exploration potential, though the data itself is not new in this announcement. - Positive factor: Potential for resource growth - Negative factor: Resource data is re-stated, not new - Negative factor: Lower confidence Inferred category Evidence · table > 0.7 Context: 17.3 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-completes-equity-raising--42ce7cbd-3586-4c40-af45-aa1b912f0a7e#fact-resource-facts-12) Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_nl - Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada - Ticker: FFM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez - Resource group id: resource:450ec92f8ceba87c1418 - Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 17300000 - Grade: 6.3 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 3522 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % copper #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-08-25 #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-03T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The re-stated Inferred resource for silver at Ming Deposit further enhances the project's polymetallic potential, though the data itself is not new in this announcement. - Positive factor: Good silver grade - Positive factor: Potential for resource growth - Negative factor: Resource data is re-stated, not new - Negative factor: Lower confidence Inferred category Evidence · table > 6.3 Context: 17.3 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-completes-equity-raising--42ce7cbd-3586-4c40-af45-aa1b912f0a7e#fact-resource-facts-13) Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_nl - Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada - Ticker: FFM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez - Resource group id: resource:4e19572cc173f535c73c - Deposit or zone: Little Deer #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 2900000 - Grade: 2.1 - Grade Unit: % - Contained Metal: 62 - Contained Unit: kt - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % copper #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2024-06-26 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-03T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The re-stated Indicated resource for copper at Little Deer contributes to the overall project resource base, though the data itself is not new in this announcement. - Positive factor: Good copper grade - Positive factor: Indicated category - Negative factor: Resource data is re-stated, not new Evidence · table > 2.1 Context: 2.9 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-completes-equity-raising--42ce7cbd-3586-4c40-af45-aa1b912f0a7e#fact-resource-facts-14) Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_nl - Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada - Ticker: FFM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez - Resource group id: resource:4e19572cc173f535c73c - Deposit or zone: Little Deer #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 2900000 - Grade: 0.1 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 9 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % copper #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2024-06-26 #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-03T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The re-stated Indicated resource for gold at Little Deer adds to the project's overall metal inventory, though the data itself is not new in this announcement. - Positive factor: Indicated category - Negative factor: Resource data is re-stated, not new Evidence · table > 0.1 Context: 2.9 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-completes-equity-raising--42ce7cbd-3586-4c40-af45-aa1b912f0a7e#fact-resource-facts-15) Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_nl - Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada - Ticker: FFM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez - Resource group id: resource:4e19572cc173f535c73c - Deposit or zone: Little Deer #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 2900000 - Grade: 3.4 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 320 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % copper #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2024-06-26 #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-03T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The re-stated Indicated resource for silver at Little Deer contributes to the project's byproduct potential, though the data itself is not new in this announcement. - Positive factor: Indicated category - Negative factor: Resource data is re-stated, not new Evidence · table > 3.4 Context: 2.9 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-completes-equity-raising--42ce7cbd-3586-4c40-af45-aa1b912f0a7e#fact-resource-facts-16) Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_nl - Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada - Ticker: FFM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez - Resource group id: resource:d1890ced604198b53ff8 - Deposit or zone: Little Deer #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 6200000 - Grade: 1.8 - Grade Unit: % - Contained Metal: 110 - Contained Unit: kt - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % copper #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2024-06-26 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 1.8 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-03T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The re-stated Inferred resource for copper at Little Deer adds to the project's exploration upside, though the data itself is not new in this announcement. - Positive factor: Good copper grade - Positive factor: Potential for resource growth - Negative factor: Resource data is re-stated, not new - Negative factor: Lower confidence Inferred category Evidence · table > 1.8 Context: 6.2 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-completes-equity-raising--42ce7cbd-3586-4c40-af45-aa1b912f0a7e#fact-resource-facts-17) Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_nl - Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada - Ticker: FFM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez - Resource group id: resource:d1890ced604198b53ff8 - Deposit or zone: Little Deer #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 6200000 - Grade: 0.1 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 10 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % copper #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2024-06-26 #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-03T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The re-stated Inferred resource for gold at Little Deer contributes to the project's overall exploration potential, though the data itself is not new in this announcement. - Positive factor: Potential for resource growth - Negative factor: Resource data is re-stated, not new - Negative factor: Lower confidence Inferred category Evidence · table > 0.1 Context: 6.2 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-completes-equity-raising--42ce7cbd-3586-4c40-af45-aa1b912f0a7e#fact-resource-facts-18) Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_nl - Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada - Ticker: FFM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez - Resource group id: resource:d1890ced604198b53ff8 - Deposit or zone: Little Deer #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 6200000 - Grade: 2.2 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 430 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % copper #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2024-06-26 #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-10-29T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-03T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The re-stated Inferred resource for silver at Little Deer adds to the project's overall exploration potential, though the data itself is not new in this announcement. - Positive factor: Potential for resource growth - Negative factor: Resource data is re-stated, not new - Negative factor: Lower confidence Inferred category Evidence · table > 2.2 Context: 6.2 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release ### measured [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-completes-equity-raising--42ce7cbd-3586-4c40-af45-aa1b912f0a7e#fact-resource-facts-19) Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_nl - Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada - Ticker: FFM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez - Resource group id: resource:c97a049c9bd60e9e970d - Deposit or zone: Green Bay Total #### Resource Data - Category: measured - Tonnes: 3500000 - Grade: 1.5 - Grade Unit: % - Contained Metal: 52 - Contained Unit: kt - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % copper #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-08-25 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 1.7 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-03T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The re-stated Measured resource for copper at Green Bay Total provides high-confidence tonnage and grade, underpinning project value, though the data itself is not new in this announcement. - Positive factor: High confidence Measured category - Positive factor: Good copper grade - Negative factor: Resource data is re-stated, not new Evidence · table > 1.5 Context: 3.5 #### Tags used in scoring **Measured Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves. Why it applies: category is "measured" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### measured [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-completes-equity-raising--42ce7cbd-3586-4c40-af45-aa1b912f0a7e#fact-resource-facts-20) Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_nl - Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada - Ticker: FFM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez - Resource group id: resource:c97a049c9bd60e9e970d - Deposit or zone: Green Bay Total #### Resource Data - Category: measured - Tonnes: 3500000 - Grade: 0.2 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 20 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % copper #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-08-25 #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-03T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The re-stated Measured resource for gold at Green Bay Total contributes to the overall project value, though the data itself is not new in this announcement. - Positive factor: High confidence Measured category - Negative factor: Resource data is re-stated, not new Evidence · table > 0.2 Context: 3.5 #### Tags used in scoring **Measured Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves. Why it applies: category is "measured" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### measured [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-completes-equity-raising--42ce7cbd-3586-4c40-af45-aa1b912f0a7e#fact-resource-facts-21) Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_nl - Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada - Ticker: FFM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez - Resource group id: resource:c97a049c9bd60e9e970d - Deposit or zone: Green Bay Total #### Resource Data - Category: measured - Tonnes: 3500000 - Grade: 1.3 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 147 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % copper #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-08-25 #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-03T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The re-stated Measured resource for silver at Green Bay Total adds to the polymetallic nature of the project, though the data itself is not new in this announcement. - Positive factor: High confidence Measured category - Negative factor: Resource data is re-stated, not new Evidence · table > 1.3 Context: 3.5 #### Tags used in scoring **Measured Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves. Why it applies: category is "measured" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-completes-equity-raising--42ce7cbd-3586-4c40-af45-aa1b912f0a7e#fact-resource-facts-22) Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_nl - Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada - Ticker: FFM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez - Resource group id: resource:d09b83b7343e79c54b2e - Deposit or zone: Green Bay Total #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 56700000 - Grade: 1.9 - Grade Unit: % - Contained Metal: 1103 - Contained Unit: kt - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % copper #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-08-25 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.5 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-03T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The re-stated Indicated resource for copper at Green Bay Total represents a significant portion of the project's value, providing a strong base for future studies, though the data itself is not new in this announcement. - Positive factor: Large Indicated tonnage - Positive factor: Good copper grade - Negative factor: Resource data is re-stated, not new Evidence · table > 1.9 Context: 56.7 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-completes-equity-raising--42ce7cbd-3586-4c40-af45-aa1b912f0a7e#fact-resource-facts-23) Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_nl - Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada - Ticker: FFM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez - Resource group id: resource:d09b83b7343e79c54b2e - Deposit or zone: Green Bay Total #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 56700000 - Grade: 0.5 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 887 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % copper #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-08-25 #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-03T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The re-stated Indicated resource for gold at Green Bay Total significantly contributes to the project's overall contained metal, though the data itself is not new in this announcement. - Positive factor: Large Indicated tonnage - Negative factor: Resource data is re-stated, not new Evidence · table > 0.5 Context: 56.7 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-completes-equity-raising--42ce7cbd-3586-4c40-af45-aa1b912f0a7e#fact-resource-facts-24) Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_nl - Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada - Ticker: FFM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez - Resource group id: resource:d09b83b7343e79c54b2e - Deposit or zone: Green Bay Total #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 56700000 - Grade: 4.4 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 8027 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % copper #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-08-25 #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-03T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The re-stated Indicated resource for silver at Green Bay Total adds significant byproduct potential to the project, though the data itself is not new in this announcement. - Positive factor: Large Indicated tonnage - Positive factor: Good silver grade - Negative factor: Resource data is re-stated, not new Evidence · table > 4.4 Context: 56.7 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-completes-equity-raising--42ce7cbd-3586-4c40-af45-aa1b912f0a7e#fact-resource-facts-25) Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_nl - Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada - Ticker: FFM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez - Resource group id: resource:9fe1180415dd88ea6e5f - Deposit or zone: Green Bay Total #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 23500000 - Grade: 1.9 - Grade Unit: % - Contained Metal: 454 - Contained Unit: kt - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % copper #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-08-25 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 2.5 - Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-03T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The re-stated Inferred resource for copper at Green Bay Total indicates significant exploration upside and potential for future conversion, though the data itself is not new in this announcement. - Positive factor: Good copper grade - Positive factor: Potential for resource growth - Negative factor: Resource data is re-stated, not new - Negative factor: Lower confidence Inferred category Evidence · table > 1.9 Context: 23.5 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-completes-equity-raising--42ce7cbd-3586-4c40-af45-aa1b912f0a7e#fact-resource-facts-26) Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_nl - Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada - Ticker: FFM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez - Resource group id: resource:9fe1180415dd88ea6e5f - Deposit or zone: Green Bay Total #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 23500000 - Grade: 0.6 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 414 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % copper #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-08-25 #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-03T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The re-stated Inferred resource for gold at Green Bay Total adds to the project's exploration potential, though the data itself is not new in this announcement. - Positive factor: Potential for resource growth - Negative factor: Resource data is re-stated, not new - Negative factor: Lower confidence Inferred category Evidence · table > 0.6 Context: 23.5 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-completes-equity-raising--42ce7cbd-3586-4c40-af45-aa1b912f0a7e#fact-resource-facts-27) Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_nl - Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada - Ticker: FFM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Mr Juan Gutierrez - Resource group id: resource:9fe1180415dd88ea6e5f - Deposit or zone: Green Bay Total #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 23500000 - Grade: 5.2 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 3952 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 1 - Cutoff Unit: % copper #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-08-25 #### Metal Equivalent - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-03T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The re-stated Inferred resource for silver at Green Bay Total further enhances the project's polymetallic potential, though the data itself is not new in this announcement. - Positive factor: Good silver grade - Positive factor: Potential for resource growth - Negative factor: Resource data is re-stated, not new - Negative factor: Lower confidence Inferred category Evidence · table > 5.2 Context: 23.5 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.