# FireFly set for nine-rig exploration and growth campaign after highly successful ~A$139m raising

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-set-for-nine-rig-exploration-and-growth-campaign-after-highly-successful--26c03970-7784-4867-ac21-ac9c2a9c8cd4

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/FFM/news/6248913719444711/firefly-set-for-nine-rig-exploration-and-growth-campaign-after-highly-successful

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2025-12-03T23:22:19.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: FireFly Metals Ltd

- Ticker: FFM

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Newfoundland, Canada

- Primary commodity: Copper

- Secondary commodities: Gold, Silver

- Document categories: Resource update, Capital raise

- Extracted: 2026-09-12 04:49:47 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.80 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

FireFly Metals has completed a successful ~A$139m equity raising via institutional placement, charity flow-through, and a Canadian bought deal. The proceeds will fund a nine-rig exploration campaign and upscaled mining studies at the Green Bay Copper-Gold Project in Canada.

Reasoning: Highly successful capital raise provides significant liquidity to fund aggressive exploration and advanced technical studies at a major copper-gold project.

- Positive factor: Significant capital raise of ~A$139m

- Positive factor: Strong pro-forma cash position of A$244.1m

- Positive factor: Resource growth campaign funded

- Positive factor: Upscaled mining studies progressing

- Negative factor: Institutional placement at a 12.6% discount to last close

Facts used in scoring: 16

## Classification and evidence

No classification tags are available.

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 15. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (15)

### measured

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-set-for-nine-rig-exploration-and-growth-campaign-after-highly-successful--26c03970-7784-4867-ac21-ac9c2a9c8cd4#fact-resource-facts-1)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Resource group id: resource:b60a6597161664d56ac4
- Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: measured
- Tonnes: 6300000
- Grade: 1.5
- Grade Unit: %
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % copper

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2025-11-18

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource component of the Ming deposit.

Evidence · table

> 1.5

Context: 6.3

#### Tags used in scoring

**Measured Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### measured

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-set-for-nine-rig-exploration-and-growth-campaign-after-highly-successful--26c03970-7784-4867-ac21-ac9c2a9c8cd4#fact-resource-facts-2)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Resource group id: resource:b60a6597161664d56ac4
- Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: measured
- Tonnes: 6300000
- Grade: 0.3
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % copper

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2025-11-18

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured gold component of the Ming deposit.

Evidence · table

> 0.3

Context: 6.3

#### Tags used in scoring

**Measured Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### measured

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-set-for-nine-rig-exploration-and-growth-campaign-after-highly-successful--26c03970-7784-4867-ac21-ac9c2a9c8cd4#fact-resource-facts-3)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · silver

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Resource group id: resource:b60a6597161664d56ac4
- Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: measured
- Tonnes: 6300000
- Grade: 1.9
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % copper

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2025-11-18

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 1.7
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured silver component of the Ming deposit.

Evidence · table

> 1.9

Context: 6.3

#### Tags used in scoring

**Measured Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-set-for-nine-rig-exploration-and-growth-campaign-after-highly-successful--26c03970-7784-4867-ac21-ac9c2a9c8cd4#fact-resource-facts-4)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Resource group id: resource:4887299efbd2e51841ab
- Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 41200000
- Grade: 1.7
- Grade Unit: %
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % copper

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2025-11-18

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource component of the Ming deposit.

Evidence · table

> 1.7

Context: 41.2

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-set-for-nine-rig-exploration-and-growth-campaign-after-highly-successful--26c03970-7784-4867-ac21-ac9c2a9c8cd4#fact-resource-facts-5)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Resource group id: resource:4887299efbd2e51841ab
- Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 41200000
- Grade: 0.4
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % copper

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2025-11-18

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated gold component of the Ming deposit.

Evidence · table

> 0.4

Context: 41.2

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-set-for-nine-rig-exploration-and-growth-campaign-after-highly-successful--26c03970-7784-4867-ac21-ac9c2a9c8cd4#fact-resource-facts-6)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · silver

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Resource group id: resource:4887299efbd2e51841ab
- Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 41200000
- Grade: 3.2
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % copper

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2025-11-18

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 2.1
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated silver component of the Ming deposit.

Evidence · table

> 3.2

Context: 41.2

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-set-for-nine-rig-exploration-and-growth-campaign-after-highly-successful--26c03970-7784-4867-ac21-ac9c2a9c8cd4#fact-resource-facts-7)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Resource group id: resource:1e1fc4458a365f56b322
- Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 23100000
- Grade: 2
- Grade Unit: %
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % copper

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2025-11-18

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 2.6
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource component of the Ming deposit.

Evidence · table

> 2.0

Context: 23.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-set-for-nine-rig-exploration-and-growth-campaign-after-highly-successful--26c03970-7784-4867-ac21-ac9c2a9c8cd4#fact-resource-facts-8)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Resource group id: resource:1e1fc4458a365f56b322
- Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 23100000
- Grade: 0.7
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % copper

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2025-11-18

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 2.6
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred gold component of the Ming deposit.

Evidence · table

> 0.7

Context: 23.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-set-for-nine-rig-exploration-and-growth-campaign-after-highly-successful--26c03970-7784-4867-ac21-ac9c2a9c8cd4#fact-resource-facts-9)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · silver

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc, ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Resource group id: resource:1e1fc4458a365f56b322
- Deposit or zone: Ming Deposit
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 23100000
- Grade: 5.9
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % copper

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2025-11-18

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 2.6
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred silver component of the Ming deposit.

Evidence · table

> 5.9

Context: 23.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-set-for-nine-rig-exploration-and-growth-campaign-after-highly-successful--26c03970-7784-4867-ac21-ac9c2a9c8cd4#fact-resource-facts-10)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Resource group id: resource:3e0304aa871ee0b8fb9c
- Deposit or zone: Little Deer Complex
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 2900000
- Grade: 2.1
- Grade Unit: %
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % copper

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2024-06-26

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource component of the Little Deer deposit.

Evidence · table

> 2.1

Context: 2.9

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-set-for-nine-rig-exploration-and-growth-campaign-after-highly-successful--26c03970-7784-4867-ac21-ac9c2a9c8cd4#fact-resource-facts-11)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Resource group id: resource:3e0304aa871ee0b8fb9c
- Deposit or zone: Little Deer Complex
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 2900000
- Grade: 0.1
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % copper

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2024-06-26

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated gold component of the Little Deer deposit.

Evidence · table

> 0.1

Context: 2.9

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-set-for-nine-rig-exploration-and-growth-campaign-after-highly-successful--26c03970-7784-4867-ac21-ac9c2a9c8cd4#fact-resource-facts-12)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · silver

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Resource group id: resource:3e0304aa871ee0b8fb9c
- Deposit or zone: Little Deer Complex
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 2900000
- Grade: 3.4
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % copper

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2024-06-26

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 2.3
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated silver component of the Little Deer deposit.

Evidence · table

> 3.4

Context: 2.9

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-set-for-nine-rig-exploration-and-growth-campaign-after-highly-successful--26c03970-7784-4867-ac21-ac9c2a9c8cd4#fact-resource-facts-13)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · copper

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Resource group id: resource:5c4d19dafc48d948c2dc
- Deposit or zone: Little Deer Complex
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 6200000
- Grade: 1.8
- Grade Unit: %
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % copper

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2024-06-26

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource component of the Little Deer deposit.

Evidence · table

> 1.8

Context: 6.2

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-set-for-nine-rig-exploration-and-growth-campaign-after-highly-successful--26c03970-7784-4867-ac21-ac9c2a9c8cd4#fact-resource-facts-14)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Resource group id: resource:5c4d19dafc48d948c2dc
- Deposit or zone: Little Deer Complex
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 6200000
- Grade: 0.1
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % copper

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2024-06-26

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred gold component of the Little Deer deposit.

Evidence · table

> 0.1

Context: 6.2

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/firefly-set-for-nine-rig-exploration-and-growth-campaign-after-highly-successful--26c03970-7784-4867-ac21-ac9c2a9c8cd4#fact-resource-facts-15)

Green Bay Copper-Gold Project · silver

#### Identity

- Project: Green Bay Copper-Gold Project
- Commodity: silver
- Region: canada\_nl
- Reported Region: Newfoundland, Canada
- Ticker: FFM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Resource group id: resource:5c4d19dafc48d948c2dc
- Deposit or zone: Little Deer Complex
- Mining method: underground

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 6200000
- Grade: 2.2
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Cutoff Grade: 1
- Cutoff Unit: % copper

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2024-06-26

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 1.8
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred silver component of the Little Deer deposit.

Evidence · table

> 2.2

Context: 6.2

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
