Fortitude Gold Drills 1.52 Meters Grading 26.67 G/T Gold Within 13.72 Meters Grading 3.58 G/T Gold at East Camp Douglas
Original announcement by orestocks on
- Company
- Fortitude Gold Corp.
- Ticker
- FTCO
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- Nevada
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-21 13:25:31 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Fortitude Gold has reported high-grade gold drill results from the new Triumph target at the East Camp Douglas property in Nevada. Notable intercepts include 1.52m at 26.67 g/t Au within 13.72m at 3.58 g/t Au and 3.05m at 19.60 g/t Au within 7.62m at 8.87 g/t Au.
Reasoning: The release reports several high-grade gold intercepts at the Triumph target, including a 26.67 g/t Au interval, which represents significant discovery potential and exceeds historical project averages.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercepts reported at the new Triumph target
- Intercepts exceed previous project averages for East Camp Douglas
- Discovery of high-grade mineralization at a new target within the district
Facts used in scoring: 35
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: The 1.52 m @ 26.67 g/t Au intercept is exceptionally high-grade for an open-pit/district scale gold target.
Evidence · text
“1.52 meters grading 26.67 grams per tonne (g/t) gold”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: Drilling at the Triumph target, located 600m north of White Rock West, represents an extension of known mineralization.
Evidence · text
“The Triumph target is located approximately 600 meters north of the White Rock West target”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release identifies the assay laboratory as American Assay Laboratories.
Evidence · text
“Assays by American Assay Laboratories, Sparks, Nevada, USA.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 35. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (35)
ECDRC-246East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 3.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.72 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-246
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.72 m
- From
- 9.14 m
- To
- 22.86 m
- Intercept Depth
- 9.14 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-246:9.14-22.86
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong intercept at the new target.
Positive factors
- Solid grade and width for the target
Evidence · text
“13.72 m of 3.58 g/t gold”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-246East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 26.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-246
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 26.67
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.52 m
- From
- 19.81 m
- To
- 21.33 m
- Intercept Depth
- 9.14 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-246:19.81-21.33
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade component within the larger intercept.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade intercept
Evidence · text
“1.52 m of 26.67 g/t gold”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-256East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 3.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.67 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-256
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.67 m
- From
- 39.62 m
- To
- 50.29 m
- Intercept Depth
- 39.62 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-256:39.62-50.29
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Good intercept at the new target.
Positive factors
- Consistent high-grade mineralization
Evidence · text
“10.67 m of 3.72 g/t gold”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-256East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 11.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-256
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.05 m
- From
- 39.62 m
- To
- 42.67 m
- Intercept Depth
- 39.62 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-256:39.62-42.67
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade part of the intercept.
Positive factors
- High-grade component
Evidence · text
“3.05 m of 11.16 g/t gold”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-381East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 5.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-381
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.14 m
- From
- 60.96 m
- To
- 70.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 60.96 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-381:60.96-70.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong grade and width
Evidence · text
“9.14 m of 5.10 g/t gold”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-381East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 13.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-381
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.05 m
- From
- 62.48 m
- To
- 65.53 m
- Intercept Depth
- 60.96 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-381:62.48-65.53
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade part of the intercept.
Positive factors
- High-grade component
Evidence · text
“3.05 m of 13.72 g/t gold”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-383East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 8.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.62 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-383
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.62 m
- From
- 120.4 m
- To
- 128.02 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-383:120.4-128.02
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong grade and width
Evidence · text
“7.62 m of 8.87 g/t gold”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-383East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 19.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-383
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.05 m
- From
- 124.97 m
- To
- 128.02 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-383:124.97-128.02
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high grade component.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade component
Evidence · text
“3.05 m of 19.60 g/t gold”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-242East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-242
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.05 m
- From
- 19.81 m
- To
- 22.86 m
- Intercept Depth
- 19.81 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-242:19.81-22.86
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.32 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.32”
Context: ECDRC-242
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
incl.East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 2.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.05 m
- From
- 59.44 m
- To
- 62.49 m
- Intercept Depth
- 59.44 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:59.44-62.49
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.11 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.11 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.11”
Context: incl.
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-243East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 1.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-243
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.52 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 1.52 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-243:0-1.52
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.21 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.21”
Context: ECDRC-243
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-243East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 1.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.57 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-243
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.57 m
- From
- 6.1 m
- To
- 10.67 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-243:6.1-10.67
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.38 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.38”
Context: EAST CAMP DOUGLAS - TRIUMPH TARGET DRILL
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
incl.East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 2.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.99
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.52 m
- From
- 6.1 m
- To
- 7.62 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:6.1-7.62
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.99 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 4.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.99 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.99”
Context: incl.
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-244East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 1.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-244
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.52 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 1.52 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-244:0-1.52
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.29 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.29”
Context: ECDRC-244
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-244East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 1.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-244
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 16.76 m
- To
- 22.86 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16.76 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-244:16.76-22.86
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.17 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 7.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.17”
Context: EAST CAMP DOUGLAS - TRIUMPH TARGET DRILL
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
incl.East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 2.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.52 m
- From
- 21.34 m
- To
- 22.86 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21.34 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:21.34-22.86
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.28 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.28 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.28”
Context: incl.
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-245East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 1.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-245
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.05 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 3.05 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-245:0-3.05
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.73 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.73”
Context: ECDRC-245
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-245East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-245
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 3.05 m
- To
- 9.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3.05 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-245:3.05-9.15
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: EAST CAMP DOUGLAS - TRIUMPH TARGET DRILL
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-245East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-245
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.05 m
- From
- 15.24 m
- To
- 18.29 m
- Intercept Depth
- 15.24 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-245:15.24-18.29
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.37 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.37”
Context: EAST CAMP DOUGLAS - TRIUMPH TARGET DRILL
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-245East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-245
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.63
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.52 m
- From
- 19.81 m
- To
- 21.33 m
- Intercept Depth
- 19.81 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-245:19.81-21.33
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.63 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.63”
Context: EAST CAMP DOUGLAS - TRIUMPH TARGET DRILL
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-245East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-245
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.52 m
- From
- 73.15 m
- To
- 74.67 m
- Intercept Depth
- 73.15 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-245:73.15-74.67
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.50”
Context: EAST CAMP DOUGLAS - TRIUMPH TARGET DRILL
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-245East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 0.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-245
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.52 m
- From
- 79.25 m
- To
- 80.77 m
- Intercept Depth
- 79.25 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-245:79.25-80.77
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.77 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.77”
Context: EAST CAMP DOUGLAS - TRIUMPH TARGET DRILL
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-246East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-246
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.52 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 1.52 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-246:0-1.52
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.42 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.42”
Context: ECDRC-246
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
incl.East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 26.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 26.67
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.52 m
- From
- 19.81 m
- To
- 21.33 m
- Intercept Depth
- 19.81 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:19.81-21.33
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 26.67 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 40.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 26.67 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“26.67”
Context: incl.
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-250East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-250
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.52 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 1.52 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-250:0-1.52
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.60”
Context: ECDRC-250
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-250East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-250
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.05 m
- From
- 13.72 m
- To
- 16.77 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13.72 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-250:13.72-16.77
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.39 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.39”
Context: EAST CAMP DOUGLAS - TRIUMPH TARGET DRILL
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-252East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 7.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-252
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.52 m
- From
- 32 m
- To
- 33.52 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-252:32-33.52
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.39 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 11.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.39 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.39”
Context: ECDRC-252
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-252East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-252
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.05 m
- From
- 35.05 m
- To
- 38.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 35.05 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-252:35.05-38.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.23 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.23”
Context: EAST CAMP DOUGLAS - TRIUMPH TARGET DRILL
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-253East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-253
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.05 m
- From
- 39.62 m
- To
- 42.67 m
- Intercept Depth
- 39.62 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-253:39.62-42.67
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.42 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.42”
Context: ECDRC-253
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-254East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.57 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-254
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.57 m
- From
- 18.29 m
- To
- 22.86 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18.29 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-254:18.29-22.86
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.52 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.52”
Context: ECDRC-254
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-254East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-254
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.05 m
- From
- 25.91 m
- To
- 28.96 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.91 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-254:25.91-28.96
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.70”
Context: EAST CAMP DOUGLAS - TRIUMPH TARGET DRILL
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-254East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-254
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.05 m
- From
- 60.96 m
- To
- 64.01 m
- Intercept Depth
- 60.96 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-254:60.96-64.01
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.21 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.21 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.21”
Context: EAST CAMP DOUGLAS - TRIUMPH TARGET DRILL
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-254East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 1.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-254
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.05 m
- From
- 68.58 m
- To
- 71.63 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68.58 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-254:68.58-71.63
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.26 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.26”
Context: EAST CAMP DOUGLAS - TRIUMPH TARGET DRILL
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-255East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-255
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.52 m
- From
- 6.1 m
- To
- 7.62 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-255:6.1-7.62
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.35 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.35”
Context: ECDRC-255
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
ECDRC-255East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 12.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ECDRC-255
- Project
- East Camp Douglas
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- FTCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.47
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.52 m
- From
- 22.86 m
- To
- 24.38 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22.86 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ECDRC-255:22.86-24.38
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Triumph target
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.47 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 19.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 12.47 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.47”
Context: EAST CAMP DOUGLAS - TRIUMPH TARGET DRILL
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.