Freegold Intersects 3.10 g/t Au over 102.8 m including 5.18 g/t Au over 55.9 m as it advances Golden Summit PFS

Original announcement by cnw on

Company
Freegold Limited
Ticker
FVL
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Alaska
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results, Resource update, Economic study
Extracted
2026-09-16 12:26:02 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Freegold Limited announced new drill results from its Golden Summit project in Alaska, highlighted by an intercept of 3.10 g/t Au over 102.8 m, including 1.2 m at 183.4 g/t Au, and another of 71.46 g/t Au over 5.8 m. The company is advancing its Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS) with ongoing infill, condemnation, geotechnical, and metallurgical programs. The release also restated the July 2025 mineral resource estimate of 17.2 Moz indicated and 11.9 Moz inferred gold.

Reasoning: The drill program at Golden Summit delivered several high-grade and long gold intercepts, including bonanza grades, which are significant for resource conversion and exploration. The detailed QA/QC disclosure supports the credibility of the results, and the program is actively advancing the project towards a Pre-Feasibility Study, indicating strong progress and future potential.

Positive factors

  • Several high-grade gold intercepts, including bonanza grades, were reported.
  • Long drill intercepts confirm broad continuity of mineralization.
  • Detailed QA/QC procedures are disclosed, enhancing data credibility.
  • Drilling supports resource conversion and extends mineralization, advancing the project towards a PFS.
  • Exploration potential for additional discoveries on the large property is highlighted.

Negative factors

  • True width of intercepts cannot be determined, potentially overstating actual thickness.
  • Some reported grades are below the project's historical average.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 45

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 45. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (44)

GS2631Golden Summit · goldGrade: 7.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2631
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
7.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.3 m
From
46.9 m
To
47.2 m
Hole Depth
260.9 m
Intercept Depth
46.9 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2631:46.9-47.2

Location

Easting
479702
Northing
7215398
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade but very narrow intercept, contributing to the overall drill program results.

Positive factors

  • High grade for a narrow intercept.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2631Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2631
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.4 m
From
163.3 m
To
184.7 m
Hole Depth
260.9 m
Intercept Depth
46.9 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2631:163.3-184.7

Location

Easting
479702
Northing
7215398
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate grade over a reasonable length, contributing to the overall drill program results.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length and grade.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2634Golden Summit · goldGrade: 0.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2634
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
0.89
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.3 m
From
178.3 m
To
188.6 m
Hole Depth
576.8 m
Intercept Depth
178.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2634:178.3-188.6

Location

Easting
479795
Northing
7215352
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade intercept over a moderate length, contributing to the overall drill program results.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2634Golden Summit · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2634
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
0.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
33.6 m
From
352.6 m
To
386.2 m
Hole Depth
576.8 m
Intercept Depth
178.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2634:352.6-386.2

Location

Easting
479795
Northing
7215352
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade intercept over a moderate length, contributing to the overall drill program results.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2634Golden Summit · goldGrade: 3.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 102.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2634
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
3.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
102.8 m
From
460.2 m
To
563 m
Hole Depth
576.8 m
Intercept Depth
178.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2634:460.2-563

Location

Easting
479795
Northing
7215352
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept represents a significant high-grade and long zone of gold mineralization, contributing strongly to the project's potential.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade-thickness product (318.68 g/t*m) exceeding the exceptional threshold for gold.
  • Exceptional intercept length (102.8 m) indicating broad mineralization.

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The grade-thickness product of 318.68 g/t*m exceeds the exceptional threshold of 300 g/t*m for gold.

Evidence · table

“3.10”

Context: 102.8

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2634Golden Summit · goldGrade: 5.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 55.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2634
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
5.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
55.9 m
From
502.9 m
To
558.8 m
Hole Depth
576.8 m
Intercept Depth
178.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2634:502.9-558.8

Location

Easting
479795
Northing
7215352
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade and long intercept is a significant result, indicating strong mineralization within the broader zone.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade (5.18 g/t Au) for gold, exceeding the exceptional threshold for open pit mining.
  • Strong intercept length (55.9 m) contributing to a high grade-thickness product (289.56 g/t*m).

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The grade of 5.18 g/t Au exceeds the exceptional threshold of 5 g/t Au for open pit gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“5.18”

Context: 55.9

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2634Golden Summit · goldGrade: 183.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2634
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
183.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
From
555.6 m
To
556.8 m
Hole Depth
576.8 m
Intercept Depth
178.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2634:555.6-556.8

Location

Easting
479795
Northing
7215352
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade intercept, although narrow, is highly significant and indicates the presence of very high-grade gold mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional bonanza grade (183.4 g/t Au) for gold, significantly exceeding the exceptional threshold.
  • High grade-thickness product (220.08 g/t*m) despite narrow width.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length.

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The grade of 183.4 g/t Au is exceptionally high, far exceeding the exceptional threshold of 5 g/t Au for open pit gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“183.4”

Context: 1.2

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2636Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2636
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
27.1 m
From
14.3 m
To
41.4 m
Hole Depth
462.4 m
Intercept Depth
14.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2636:14.3-41.4

Location

Easting
479999
Northing
7215602
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate grade over a reasonable length, contributing to the overall drill program results.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length and grade.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2636Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2636
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.2 m
From
66.1 m
To
75.3 m
Hole Depth
462.4 m
Intercept Depth
14.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2636:66.1-75.3

Location

Easting
479999
Northing
7215602
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate grade over a narrow length, contributing to the overall drill program results.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2636Golden Summit · goldGrade: 0.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2636
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
0.91
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.6 m
From
99.2 m
To
108.8 m
Hole Depth
462.4 m
Intercept Depth
14.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2636:99.2-108.8

Location

Easting
479999
Northing
7215602
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade intercept over a narrow length, contributing to the overall drill program results.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2636Golden Summit · goldGrade: 0.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2636
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
0.91
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
36.5 m
From
188.1 m
To
224.6 m
Hole Depth
462.4 m
Intercept Depth
14.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2636:188.1-224.6

Location

Easting
479999
Northing
7215602
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade intercept over a moderate length, contributing to the overall drill program results.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2636Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2636
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17.9 m
From
188.1 m
To
206 m
Hole Depth
462.4 m
Intercept Depth
14.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2636:188.1-206

Location

Easting
479999
Northing
7215602
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate grade over a reasonable length, contributing to the overall drill program results.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length and grade.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2636Golden Summit · goldGrade: 2.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2636
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
2.42
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.1 m
From
371.9 m
To
377 m
Hole Depth
462.4 m
Intercept Depth
14.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2636:371.9-377

Location

Easting
479999
Northing
7215602
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate grade over a narrow length, contributing to the overall drill program results.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2636Golden Summit · goldGrade: 4.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2636
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
4.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.4 m
From
422.5 m
To
428.9 m
Hole Depth
462.4 m
Intercept Depth
14.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2636:422.5-428.9

Location

Easting
479999
Northing
7215602
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong grade over a narrow length, contributing to the overall drill program results.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for gold.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2641Golden Summit · goldGrade: 71.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2641
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
71.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.8 m
From
154.5 m
To
160.3 m
Hole Depth
462.3 m
Intercept Depth
154.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2641:154.5-160.3

Location

Easting
479951
Northing
7215539
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-67 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade intercept is highly significant, indicating very high-grade gold mineralization and contributing strongly to the project's potential.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional bonanza grade (71.46 g/t Au) for gold, significantly exceeding the exceptional threshold.
  • High grade-thickness product (414.4 g/t*m) exceeding the exceptional threshold for gold.

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The grade of 71.46 g/t Au is exceptionally high, far exceeding the exceptional threshold of 5 g/t Au for open pit gold deposits, and the grade-thickness product of 414.4 g/t*m exceeds the exceptional threshold of 300 g/t*m.

Evidence · table

“71.46”

Context: 5.8

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2641Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 78 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2641
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
78 m
From
206.4 m
To
284.4 m
Hole Depth
462.3 m
Intercept Depth
154.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2641:206.4-284.4

Location

Easting
479951
Northing
7215539
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-67 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A long intercept with moderate grade, contributing significantly to the overall mineralization footprint.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length (78 m) indicating broad mineralization.
  • Moderate grade for gold.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2641Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 62.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2641
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
62.7 m
From
206.4 m
To
269.1 m
Hole Depth
462.3 m
Intercept Depth
154.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2641:206.4-269.1

Location

Easting
479951
Northing
7215539
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-67 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A long intercept with moderate grade, contributing significantly to the overall mineralization footprint.

Positive factors

  • Strong intercept length (62.7 m) indicating broad mineralization.
  • Moderate grade for gold.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2641Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2641
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.4 m
From
206.4 m
To
254.8 m
Hole Depth
462.3 m
Intercept Depth
154.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2641:206.4-254.8

Location

Easting
479951
Northing
7215539
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-67 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A long intercept with moderate grade, contributing significantly to the overall mineralization footprint.

Positive factors

  • Strong intercept length (48.4 m) indicating broad mineralization.
  • Moderate grade for gold.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2641Golden Summit · goldGrade: 4.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2641
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
4.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.5 m
From
278.9 m
To
284.4 m
Hole Depth
462.3 m
Intercept Depth
154.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2641:278.9-284.4

Location

Easting
479951
Northing
7215539
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-67 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong grade over a narrow length, contributing to the overall drill program results.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for gold.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2641Golden Summit · goldGrade: 2.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2641
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
2.77
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
337.4 m
To
345 m
Hole Depth
462.3 m
Intercept Depth
154.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2641:337.4-345

Location

Easting
479951
Northing
7215539
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-67 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate grade over a narrow length, contributing to the overall drill program results.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2641Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2641
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.8 m
From
381 m
To
390.8 m
Hole Depth
462.3 m
Intercept Depth
154.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2641:381-390.8

Location

Easting
479951
Northing
7215539
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-67 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate grade over a narrow length, contributing to the overall drill program results.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2632Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2632
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
291.7 m
To
303.9 m
Hole Depth
913.5 m
Intercept Depth
291.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2632:291.7-303.9

Location

Easting
479347
Northing
7215252
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate grade over a narrow length, contributing to the overall drill program results.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2632Golden Summit · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2632
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.7 m
From
328.3 m
To
377 m
Hole Depth
913.5 m
Intercept Depth
291.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2632:328.3-377

Location

Easting
479347
Northing
7215252
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade intercept over a strong length, contributing to the overall drill program results.

Positive factors

  • Strong intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2632Golden Summit · goldGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 283.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2632
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
0.61
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
283.8 m
From
431.6 m
To
715.4 m
Hole Depth
913.5 m
Intercept Depth
291.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2632:431.6-715.4

Location

Easting
479347
Northing
7215252
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very long intercept, despite the low grade, indicates significant mineralization continuity and volume.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length (283.8 m) indicating very broad mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2632Golden Summit · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2632
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.4 m
From
456.3 m
To
480.7 m
Hole Depth
913.5 m
Intercept Depth
291.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2632:456.3-480.7

Location

Easting
479347
Northing
7215252
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade intercept over a moderate length, contributing to the overall drill program results.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2632Golden Summit · goldGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 64 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2632
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
0.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
64 m
From
529.4 m
To
593.4 m
Hole Depth
913.5 m
Intercept Depth
291.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2632:529.4-593.4

Location

Easting
479347
Northing
7215252
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A long intercept with low grade, contributing to the overall mineralization footprint.

Positive factors

  • Strong intercept length (64 m) indicating broad mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2632Golden Summit · goldGrade: 0.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 42.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2632
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
0.81
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
42.6 m
From
620.9 m
To
663.5 m
Hole Depth
913.5 m
Intercept Depth
291.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2632:620.9-663.5

Location

Easting
479347
Northing
7215252
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A long intercept with low grade, contributing to the overall mineralization footprint.

Positive factors

  • Strong intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2632Golden Summit · goldGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2632
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
0.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
28.1 m
From
687.3 m
To
715.4 m
Hole Depth
913.5 m
Intercept Depth
291.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2632:687.3-715.4

Location

Easting
479347
Northing
7215252
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade intercept over a moderate length, contributing to the overall drill program results.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2635Golden Summit · goldGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2635
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
0.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.3 m
From
32.6 m
To
50.9 m
Hole Depth
880 m
Intercept Depth
32.6 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2635:32.6-50.9

Location

Easting
479046
Northing
7215055
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low-grade intercept over a moderate length, contributing to the overall drill program results.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2635Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 88 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2635
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
88 m
From
246 m
To
334.4 m
Hole Depth
880 m
Intercept Depth
32.6 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2635:246-334.4

Location

Easting
479046
Northing
7215055
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A long intercept with moderate grade, contributing significantly to the overall mineralization footprint.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length (88 m) indicating broad mineralization.
  • Moderate grade for gold.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2635Golden Summit · goldGrade: 3.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2635
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
3.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
246 m
To
258.2 m
Hole Depth
880 m
Intercept Depth
32.6 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2635:246-258.2

Location

Easting
479046
Northing
7215055
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong grade over a narrow length, contributing to the overall drill program results.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for gold.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2635Golden Summit · goldGrade: 0.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 112.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2635
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
0.77
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
112.8 m
From
480.7 m
To
593.5 m
Hole Depth
880 m
Intercept Depth
32.6 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2635:480.7-593.5

Location

Easting
479046
Northing
7215055
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very long intercept, despite the low grade, indicates significant mineralization continuity and volume.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length (112.8 m) indicating very broad mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2635Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2635
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.98
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.2 m
From
611.7 m
To
620.9 m
Hole Depth
880 m
Intercept Depth
32.6 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2635:611.7-620.9

Location

Easting
479046
Northing
7215055
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate grade over a narrow length, contributing to the overall drill program results.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2635Golden Summit · goldGrade: 0.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 61 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2635
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
0.84
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
61 m
From
687.9 m
To
748.9 m
Hole Depth
880 m
Intercept Depth
32.6 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2635:687.9-748.9

Location

Easting
479046
Northing
7215055
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A long intercept with low grade, contributing to the overall mineralization footprint.

Positive factors

  • Strong intercept length (61 m) indicating broad mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2635Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2635
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
770.2 m
To
782.4 m
Hole Depth
880 m
Intercept Depth
32.6 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2635:770.2-782.4

Location

Easting
479046
Northing
7215055
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate grade over a narrow length, contributing to the overall drill program results.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2637Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2637
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.5 m
From
166.5 m
To
182 m
Hole Depth
462.4 m
Intercept Depth
166.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2637:166.5-182

Location

Easting
479151
Northing
7215662
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate grade over a reasonable length, contributing to the overall drill program results.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length and grade.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2637Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2637
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.9 m
From
225.1 m
To
236 m
Hole Depth
462.4 m
Intercept Depth
166.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2637:225.1-236

Location

Easting
479151
Northing
7215662
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate grade over a narrow length, contributing to the overall drill program results.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
GS2637Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2637
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.3 m
From
244.6 m
To
257.9 m
Hole Depth
462.4 m
Intercept Depth
166.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2637:244.6-257.9

Location

Easting
479151
Northing
7215662
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate grade over a narrow length, contributing to the overall drill program results.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade.

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry of mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on analytical program and QA/QC, mentioning ALS facilities, PhotonAssay, multi-element geochemistry, fire assay, and insertion of blanks and standards.

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Reason: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person and Disclosure Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”
inclGolden Summit · goldGrade: 5.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 55.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
5.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
55.9 m
From
502.9 m
To
558.8 m
Hole Depth
700 m
Intercept Depth
502.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:502.9-558.8

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.18 g/t gold is exceptional against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 289.6 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 5.18 g/t gold is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.18”

Context: incl

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inclGolden Summit · goldGrade: 183.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
183.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
From
555.6 m
To
556.8 m
Hole Depth
700 m
Intercept Depth
555.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:555.6-556.8

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 183.4 g/t gold is exceptional against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 220.1 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 183.4 g/t gold is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“183.4”

Context: incl

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inclGolden Summit · goldGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17.9 m
From
188.1 m
To
206 m
Hole Depth
700 m
Intercept Depth
188.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:188.1-206

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.33 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 23.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.33”

Context: incl

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inclGolden Summit · goldGrade: 1.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 62.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
62.7 m
From
206.4 m
To
269.1 m
Hole Depth
700 m
Intercept Depth
206.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:206.4-269.1

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.15 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 72.1 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.15”

Context: incl

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inclGolden Summit · goldGrade: 1.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.4 m
From
206.4 m
To
254.8 m
Hole Depth
700 m
Intercept Depth
206.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:206.4-254.8

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.39 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 67.3 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.39”

Context: incl

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inclGolden Summit · goldGrade: 4.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
4.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.5 m
From
278.9 m
To
284.4 m
Hole Depth
700 m
Intercept Depth
278.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:278.9-284.4

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.64 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 25.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 4.64 g/t gold is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.64”

Context: incl

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Resource Estimates (1)

inferredGolden Summit · goldTonnes: 358000000Grade: 1.04Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 11.9Contained Unit: mozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
Alaska
Ticker
FVL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-07-01T00:00:00.000Z
Resource group id
resource:7026f88f33f456e43c94

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
358000000
Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
11.9
Contained Unit
moz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-07-01

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-07-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The restated inferred resource indicates significant exploration potential but carries lower confidence due to its category and historical nature.

Positive factors

  • Large inferred resource tonnage and contained metal.

Negative factors

  • This is a restatement of a prior estimate, not a new update.
  • Effective date is over a year old, raising currency concerns.
  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The resource is reported in the inferred category, indicating lower geological confidence and speculative nature.

Evidence · text

“17.2 million ounces at 1.24 g/t Au (432 million tonnes) and an Inferred Primary Mineral Resource of 11.9 million ounces at 1.04 g/t Au (358 million tonnes), using a 0.5 g/t cut-off grade and a gold price of $2,490. Ongoing cutting, sampling and analytical work will support an updated mineral resource estimate, which is expected to be incorporated into the upcoming PFS.”

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: The effective date of the resource estimate is July 2025, which is over a year old at the time of this announcement.

Evidence · text

“As of July 2025, Golden Summit hosts an Indicated Primary Mineral Resource of 17.2 million ounces at 1.24 g/t Au (432 million tonnes) and an Inferred Primary Mineral Resource of 11.9 million ounces at 1.04 g/t Au (358 million tonnes), using a 0.5 g/t cut-off grade and a gold price of $2,490.”

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The document provides an update on the existing resource estimate, though it is a restatement of a prior one.

Evidence · text

“As of July 2025, Golden Summit hosts an Indicated Primary Mineral Resource of 17.2 million ounces at 1.24 g/t Au (432 million tonnes) and an Inferred Primary Mineral Resource of 11.9 million ounces at 1.04 g/t Au (358 million tonnes), using a 0.5 g/t cut-off grade and a gold price of $2,490.”

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.