# Getchell Gold Corp. Files $1 Billion NPV Preliminary Economic Assessment - Fondaway Canyon Gold Project, NV

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/getchell-gold-corp-files-1-billion-npv-preliminary-economic-assessment-fondaway--e30ba407-a4bd-44ec-83d7-49871f6eae94

Original source: https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/getchell-gold-corp-files-1-billion-npv-preliminary-economic-assessment-fondaway-canyon-gold-project-nv-857110134.html

Publisher: cnw

Original announcement: 2026-09-11T23:57:46.640Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Getchell Gold Corp.

- Ticker: GTCH

- Exchange: Unavailable

- Region: Nevada

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Resource update, Metallurgy, Other

- Extracted: 2026-09-12 00:26:41 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.80 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Getchell Gold Corp. announced a Preliminary Economic Assessment \(PEA\) for its Fondaway Canyon gold project in Nevada, revealing robust economics with a $1 billion pre-tax NPV and a 58.8% IRR at a $3,200/oz gold price. The PEA projects a 10-year mine life, 1.52 million ounces of gold recovered, and average annual production of 150,000 ounces. This represents a 28% increase in contained gold and annual production compared to the previous 2025 PEA, driven by an updated 2026 Mineral Resource Estimate and refined metallurgical test work.

Reasoning: The Preliminary Economic Assessment \(PEA\) for the Fondaway Canyon gold project outlines robust economics with a $1 billion pre-tax NPV and a 58.8% IRR, representing a significant increase over the prior PEA. This is supported by an updated Mineral Resource Estimate showing increased Indicated resources and positive metallurgical test work, indicating strong potential for the project.

- Positive factor: Strong NPV and IRR

- Positive factor: Significant increase in contained gold and annual production

- Positive factor: Updated Mineral Resource Estimate with increased Indicated resources

- Positive factor: Positive metallurgical test work

- Positive factor: Significant growth potential

- Negative factor: PEA is preliminary in nature

- Negative factor: Includes Inferred resources

- Negative factor: No certainty results will be realized

- Negative factor: Refractory ore requiring complex processing

- Negative factor: Metallurgical test work not yet fully optimized or at pilot scale

- Negative factor: Limited domain coverage for metallurgy

Facts used in scoring: 11

## Classification and evidence

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The document announces an Updated Mineral Resource Estimate completed in April 2026.

Evidence · text

> The PEA incorporated the Updated Mineral Resource Estimate completed in April 2026

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The PEA and Mineral Resource Estimate were prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101.

Evidence · text

> The PEA was prepared by SLR Consulting, of Fort Collins, Colorado \("SLR"\) as the lead consultant in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects \("NI 43-101"\).

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Multiple Qualified Persons are named and responsible for different aspects of the PEA and MRE.

Evidence · text

> The Qualified Person overseeing the minable resource estimate used for the economic analysis is Jonathan R. Heiner, SME-RM, from SLR Consulting, Inc. The Qualified Person overseeing the metallurgical testing and mineral processing is Deepak Malhotra, SME-RM, from DM Consulting, LLC. The Qualified Person overseeing the overall Preliminary Economic Assessment report and the economic analysis is Donald E. Hulse, SME-RM, from SLR Consulting, Inc. The independent and Qualified Person for the mineral resource estimate, as defined by NI 43-101, is Kevin Hon, B.Sc., P.Geo., Senior Resource Geologist from APEX Geoscience Ltd. Michael Dufresne, M.Sc., P.Geo., President &amp; CEO of APEX, an independent and Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101, completed a peer review of the estimate. The Qualified Person \(as defined in NI 43-101\) who reviewed and approved the scientific and technical information in the news release is Patrick McLaughlin, P.Geo., VP Exploration at Getchell Gold Corp. and is non-independent.

**Tonnage Growth**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: The PEA reports a 28% increase in contained ounces of gold and the MRE shows a 54% increase in Indicated Mineral Resources and an 8% increase in Inferred relative to the previous 2024 MRE.

Evidence · text

> 28% increase in both contained ounces of gold and average annual gold production; and The PEA incorporated the Updated Mineral Resource Estimate completed in April 2026 that reported a 54% increase in Indicated Mineral Resources and an 8% increase in Inferred relative to the previous 2024 Mineral Resource Estimate

**Category Upgrade**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.

Why it applies: The Updated Mineral Resource Estimate reported a 54% increase in Indicated Mineral Resources.

Evidence · text

> 54% increase in Indicated Mineral Resources

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: The mineral resource is reported with specific cut-off grades for open pit \(0.3 g/t Au\) and underground \(1.5 g/t Au\) scenarios.

Evidence · text

> The mineral resource is reported at a lower cut-off of 0.3 g/t Au for the conceptual open pit and 1.5 g/t Au for the conceptual underground extraction scenario.

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: The resource estimate includes a significant portion classified as Indicated Mineral Resources.

Evidence · table

> Indicated

Context: 22,108

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The resource estimate includes a substantial portion classified as Inferred Mineral Resources.

Evidence · table

> Inferred

Context: 45,583

**Mill Route**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\).

Why it applies: The PEA contemplates a conventional milling operation with flotation.

Evidence · text

> conventional 12,000 tonne per day \("tpd"\) milling operation

**Refractory Ore**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Ore requires oxidation/pressure treatment before recovery — a processing and recovery risk.

Why it applies: The processing involves producing a concentrate for a 3rd party refinery for pressure oxidation or roasting followed by cyanidation, indicating refractory ore.

Evidence · text

> The PEA contemplates the production and sale of a high-grade concentrate to a 3 rd party refinery for pressure oxidation or roasting followed by cyanidation to produce doré.

**Low Recovery**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Recovery below the weak band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: The estimated gold recovery to sales of 80% is at the weak end of the typical range for a mill route, even considering refractory ore.

Evidence · text

> estimated gold recovery to sales of 80%

**Bench Scale Only**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Only preliminary bench tests completed — no locked-cycle or pilot work.

Why it applies: Additional metallurgical test work is recommended to optimize the grind size and flotation process, suggesting current work is not yet at pilot scale.

Evidence · text

> Additional metallurgical test work is recommended for Fondaway Canyon to optimize the grind size, the open circuit flotation process, and to define the dry stack tailings process and cost.

**Single Domain Only**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Testing limited to one composite or domain — representativeness not established.

Why it applies: The scope of the PEA was limited to the open pit mineral resource in the Central Area, implying limited domain variability testing for metallurgy.

Evidence · text

> The scope of the PEA was limited to the open pit mineral resource in the Central Area of the Project

**Gravity Route**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.

Why it applies: the document describes a gravity route \("gravity"\)

**POX/BIOX Route**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Pressure or bio-oxidation for refractory ore — high CAPEX and OPEX.

Why it applies: the document describes a pox\_biox route \("pressure oxidation"\)

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 11. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (9)

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/getchell-gold-corp-files-1-billion-npv-preliminary-economic-assessment-fondaway--e30ba407-a4bd-44ec-83d7-49871f6eae94#fact-resource-facts-0)

Fondaway Canyon · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Fondaway Canyon
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_nv
- Reported Region: Nevada
- Ticker: GTCH

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Kevin Hon, Michael Dufresne, Jonathan R. Heiner, Deepak Malhotra, Donald E. Hulse, Patrick McLaughlin
- Resource group id: resource:7c5adcb852b1f341ae65
- Deposit or zone: Global

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 22108000
- Grade: 1.4
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 999000
- Contained Unit: oz
- Cutoff Grade: 0.3
- Cutoff Unit: g/t

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-13

#### Lab

- Laboratory: APEX Geoscience Ltd.

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant indicated resource with good grade, showing growth from previous estimate.

- Positive factor: Category Upgrade

- Positive factor: Tonnage Growth

Evidence · table

> 999

Context: 22,108

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/getchell-gold-corp-files-1-billion-npv-preliminary-economic-assessment-fondaway--e30ba407-a4bd-44ec-83d7-49871f6eae94#fact-resource-facts-1)

Fondaway Canyon · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Fondaway Canyon
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_nv
- Reported Region: Nevada
- Ticker: GTCH

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Kevin Hon, Michael Dufresne, Jonathan R. Heiner, Deepak Malhotra, Donald E. Hulse, Patrick McLaughlin
- Resource group id: resource:e3487914cfcd6379ba53
- Deposit or zone: Global

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 45583000
- Grade: 1.24
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 1812000
- Contained Unit: oz
- Cutoff Grade: 0.3
- Cutoff Unit: g/t

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-13

#### Lab

- Laboratory: APEX Geoscience Ltd.

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Large inferred resource with potential for upgrade, showing growth from previous estimate.

- Positive factor: Tonnage Growth

- Negative factor: Inferred Resource

Evidence · table

> 1,812

Context: 45,583

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/getchell-gold-corp-files-1-billion-npv-preliminary-economic-assessment-fondaway--e30ba407-a4bd-44ec-83d7-49871f6eae94#fact-resource-facts-2)

Fondaway Canyon · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Fondaway Canyon
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_nv
- Reported Region: Nevada
- Ticker: GTCH

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Kevin Hon, Michael Dufresne, Jonathan R. Heiner, Deepak Malhotra, Donald E. Hulse, Patrick McLaughlin
- Resource group id: resource:c8a32512fd8efac0d556
- Deposit or zone: Central

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 22092000
- Grade: 1.4
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 998000
- Contained Unit: oz
- Cutoff Grade: 0.3
- Cutoff Unit: g/t

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-13

#### Lab

- Laboratory: APEX Geoscience Ltd.

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant indicated open pit resource in the Central zone with good grade.

- Positive factor: Category Upgrade

- Positive factor: Tonnage Growth

Evidence · table

> 998

Context: 22,092

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/getchell-gold-corp-files-1-billion-npv-preliminary-economic-assessment-fondaway--e30ba407-a4bd-44ec-83d7-49871f6eae94#fact-resource-facts-3)

Fondaway Canyon · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Fondaway Canyon
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_nv
- Reported Region: Nevada
- Ticker: GTCH

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Kevin Hon, Michael Dufresne, Jonathan R. Heiner, Deepak Malhotra, Donald E. Hulse, Patrick McLaughlin
- Resource group id: resource:0dfdd8401a707bc052b3
- Deposit or zone: Central

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 16000
- Grade: 2.08
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 1000
- Contained Unit: oz
- Cutoff Grade: 1.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-13

#### Lab

- Laboratory: APEX Geoscience Ltd.

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Small indicated underground resource in the Central zone with higher grade.

- Positive factor: Category Upgrade

Evidence · table

> 1

Context: 16

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/getchell-gold-corp-files-1-billion-npv-preliminary-economic-assessment-fondaway--e30ba407-a4bd-44ec-83d7-49871f6eae94#fact-resource-facts-4)

Fondaway Canyon · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Fondaway Canyon
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_nv
- Reported Region: Nevada
- Ticker: GTCH

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Kevin Hon, Michael Dufresne, Jonathan R. Heiner, Deepak Malhotra, Donald E. Hulse, Patrick McLaughlin
- Resource group id: resource:26cd0cec6a7353131d56
- Deposit or zone: Central

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 37619000
- Grade: 1.22
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 1476000
- Contained Unit: oz
- Cutoff Grade: 0.3
- Cutoff Unit: g/t

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-13

#### Lab

- Laboratory: APEX Geoscience Ltd.

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Large inferred open pit resource in the Central zone with potential for upgrade.

- Positive factor: Tonnage Growth

- Negative factor: Inferred Resource

Evidence · table

> 1,476

Context: 37,619

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/getchell-gold-corp-files-1-billion-npv-preliminary-economic-assessment-fondaway--e30ba407-a4bd-44ec-83d7-49871f6eae94#fact-resource-facts-5)

Fondaway Canyon · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Fondaway Canyon
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_nv
- Reported Region: Nevada
- Ticker: GTCH

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Kevin Hon, Michael Dufresne, Jonathan R. Heiner, Deepak Malhotra, Donald E. Hulse, Patrick McLaughlin
- Resource group id: resource:cfee9392437004e93a0c
- Deposit or zone: West

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 3248000
- Grade: 0.86
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 90000
- Contained Unit: oz
- Cutoff Grade: 0.3
- Cutoff Unit: g/t

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-13

#### Lab

- Laboratory: APEX Geoscience Ltd.

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Smaller inferred open pit resource in the West zone.

- Negative factor: Inferred Resource

Evidence · table

> 90

Context: 3,248

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/getchell-gold-corp-files-1-billion-npv-preliminary-economic-assessment-fondaway--e30ba407-a4bd-44ec-83d7-49871f6eae94#fact-resource-facts-6)

Fondaway Canyon · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Fondaway Canyon
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_nv
- Reported Region: Nevada
- Ticker: GTCH

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Kevin Hon, Michael Dufresne, Jonathan R. Heiner, Deepak Malhotra, Donald E. Hulse, Patrick McLaughlin
- Resource group id: resource:cc3e1c397765aef9d07a
- Deposit or zone: East

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 3687000
- Grade: 1.35
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 160000
- Contained Unit: oz
- Cutoff Grade: 0.3
- Cutoff Unit: g/t

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-13

#### Lab

- Laboratory: APEX Geoscience Ltd.

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Smaller inferred open pit resource in the East zone.

- Negative factor: Inferred Resource

Evidence · table

> 160

Context: 3,687

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/getchell-gold-corp-files-1-billion-npv-preliminary-economic-assessment-fondaway--e30ba407-a4bd-44ec-83d7-49871f6eae94#fact-resource-facts-7)

Fondaway Canyon · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Fondaway Canyon
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_nv
- Reported Region: Nevada
- Ticker: GTCH

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Kevin Hon, Michael Dufresne, Jonathan R. Heiner, Deepak Malhotra, Donald E. Hulse, Patrick McLaughlin
- Resource group id: resource:e1e3edc853863f7e9628
- Deposit or zone: Central

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 1029000
- Grade: 2.6
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 86000
- Contained Unit: oz
- Cutoff Grade: 1.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-13

#### Lab

- Laboratory: APEX Geoscience Ltd.

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred underground resource in the Central zone with higher grade.

- Negative factor: Inferred Resource

Evidence · table

> 86

Context: 1,029

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

### Fact 9

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/getchell-gold-corp-files-1-billion-npv-preliminary-economic-assessment-fondaway--e30ba407-a4bd-44ec-83d7-49871f6eae94#fact-resource-facts-10)

Edmonton

#### Identity

- Project: Edmonton
- Region: canada\_ab
- Reported Region: Alberta
- Ticker: GTCH

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Resource group id: resource:27b46714dbf19d95642e

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Explicit resource disclosure recovered from source prose.

Evidence · text

> The mineral resource is reported at a lower cut-off of 0.3 g/t Au for the conceptual open pit and 1.5 g/t Au for the conceptual underground extraction scenario.

#### Tags used in scoring

**Cut-off Lowered**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Cut-off grade reduced beyond the suspicious bound vs prior estimate — tonnage growth may be artificial inflation.

Why it applies: The mineral resource is reported at a lower cut-off of 0.3 g/t Au for the conceptual open pit and 1.5 g/t Au for the conceptual underground extraction scenario.

Evidence · text

> The mineral resource is reported at a lower cut-off of 0.3 g/t Au for the conceptual open pit and 1.5 g/t Au for the conceptual underground extraction scenario.

Context: Edmonton, Alberta

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

## Metallurgical Results (2)

### flotation

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/getchell-gold-corp-files-1-billion-npv-preliminary-economic-assessment-fondaway--e30ba407-a4bd-44ec-83d7-49871f6eae94#fact-metallurgical-facts-8)

Fondaway Canyon · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Fondaway Canyon
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_nv
- Reported Region: Nevada
- Ticker: GTCH

#### Test Work

- Program Status: detailed
- Test Type: flotation
- Processing Route: flotation to concentrate, then 3rd party pressure oxidation or roasting followed by cyanidation
- Sample: overall project average

#### Recovery

- Recovery: 80 %
- Recovery Basis: to\_payable\_metal
- Head Grade: 1.38
- Head Grade Unit: g/t
- Conc. Grade: 20
- Conc. Grade Unit: g/t

#### Reagents

- Reagent Notes: reagents, namely xanthate, AP 404 and AF 65 will be added to the mill.

#### Lab

- Laboratory: DM Consulting LLC
- Consultant: DM Consulting LLC

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Overall gold recovery of 80% to payable metal is at the weak end for a mill route, indicating refractory ore requiring complex downstream processing.

- Negative factor: Refractory Ore

- Negative factor: Low Recovery

Evidence · text

> estimated gold recovery to sales of 80%

#### Tags used in scoring

**Mill Route**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\).

Why it applies: processing\_route matches the flotation signal

**POX/BIOX Route**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Pressure or bio-oxidation for refractory ore — high CAPEX and OPEX.

Why it applies: processing\_route matches the pox\_biox signal

### flotation

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/getchell-gold-corp-files-1-billion-npv-preliminary-economic-assessment-fondaway--e30ba407-a4bd-44ec-83d7-49871f6eae94#fact-metallurgical-facts-9)

Fondaway Canyon · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Fondaway Canyon
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_nv
- Reported Region: Nevada
- Ticker: GTCH

#### Test Work

- Program Status: detailed
- Test Type: flotation
- Processing Route: flotation
- Sample: overall project average

#### Recovery

- Recovery: 84 %
- Recovery Basis: to\_concentrate
- Head Grade: 1.38
- Head Grade Unit: g/t
- Conc. Grade: 20
- Conc. Grade Unit: g/t

#### Reagents

- Reagent Notes: reagents, namely xanthate, AP 404 and AF 65 will be added to the mill.

#### Lab

- Laboratory: DM Consulting LLC
- Consultant: DM Consulting LLC

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Average gold recovery of 84% to concentrate is reasonable for flotation of refractory ore.

- Negative factor: Refractory Ore

Evidence · text

> average gold recovery to concentrate of 84%

#### Tags used in scoring

**Mill Route**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\).

Why it applies: processing\_route matches the flotation signal

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
