Globex Announces New Polymetallic Intersections at Depth on its Berrigan Mine Royalty Claims

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
GLOBEX MINING ENTERPRISES INC.
Ticker
GMX
Exchange
TSX
Region
Québec
Primary commodity
Zinc
Secondary commodities
Gold, Silver, Copper
Document categories
Drill results, Agreement transaction
Extracted
2026-09-16 02:39:20 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Globex Mining Enterprises Inc. announced new polymetallic drill results from an extension hole on its Berrigan Mine royalty property in Québec. Hole TOM-25-011EXT intersected a significant 204.25 m mineralized envelope, including high-grade zones such as 2.40 m at 31.31% ZnEq. These results confirm the vertical continuity of the polymetallic hydrothermal system at depth and validate the geological model, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.

Reasoning: New deep polymetallic intersections, including bonanza-grade zones, confirm vertical continuity and extend the mineralized system. The release provides transparent reporting of equivalent calculations and QP sign-off, with true width estimates disclosed. However, the metallurgical report used for equivalent assumptions dates back to 2002.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept
  • True Width Disclosed
  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 130

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 130. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (130)

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12.45 m
From
498.3 m
To
510.75 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:498.3-510.75
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.02
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak zinc grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“1.10”

Context: 12.45

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.45 m
From
498.3 m
To
510.75 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:498.3-510.75
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.02
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak gold grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.52”

Context: 12.45

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.45 m
From
498.3 m
To
510.75 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:498.3-510.75
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.02
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak silver grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“1.30”

Context: 12.45

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12.45 m
From
498.3 m
To
510.75 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:498.3-510.75
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.02
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with very weak copper grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: 12.45

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 7.94Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
7.94
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.4 m
From
498.3 m
To
499.7 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:498.3-499.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
16.23
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate zinc grade sub-interval within the broader zone, indicating significant zinc mineralization at depth.

Positive factors

  • Moderate Grade
  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“7.94”

Context: 1.40

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 2.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
2.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
From
498.3 m
To
499.7 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:498.3-499.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
16.23
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong gold grade sub-interval within the broader zone, indicating significant gold mineralization at depth.

Positive factors

  • Strong Grade
  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“2.28”

Context: 1.40

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 5.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
5.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
From
498.3 m
To
499.7 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:498.3-499.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
16.23
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak silver grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“5.60”

Context: 1.40

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.4 m
From
498.3 m
To
499.7 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:498.3-499.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
16.23
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with very weak copper grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: 1.40

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.76
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.9 m
From
507.85 m
To
510.75 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:507.85-510.75
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.52
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak zinc grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.76”

Context: 2.90

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 1.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.9 m
From
507.85 m
To
510.75 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:507.85-510.75
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.52
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate gold grade sub-interval within the broader zone, indicating significant gold mineralization at depth.

Positive factors

  • Moderate Grade
  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“1.02”

Context: 2.90

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 1.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.9 m
From
507.85 m
To
510.75 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:507.85-510.75
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.52
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak silver grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“1.51”

Context: 2.90

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.9 m
From
507.85 m
To
510.75 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:507.85-510.75
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.52
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with very weak copper grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: 2.90

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.97Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.97
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.95 m
From
522.25 m
To
524.2 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:522.25-524.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak zinc grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“1.97”

Context: 1.95

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.95 m
From
522.25 m
To
524.2 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:522.25-524.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak gold grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: 1.95

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 5.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
5.81
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.95 m
From
522.25 m
To
524.2 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:522.25-524.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak silver grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“5.81”

Context: 1.95

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.95 m
From
522.25 m
To
524.2 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:522.25-524.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with very weak copper grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 1.95

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: %Intercept: 204.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.58
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
204.25 m
From
553.9 m
To
758.15 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:553.9-758.15
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very long polymetallic intersection at depth with weak zinc grade, underscoring the scale of the mineralized system from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Strong Continuity
  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.58”

Context: 204.25

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 204.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
204.25 m
From
553.9 m
To
758.15 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:553.9-758.15
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very long polymetallic intersection at depth with weak gold grade, underscoring the scale of the mineralized system from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Strong Continuity
  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Context: 204.25

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 2.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 204.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
2.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
204.25 m
From
553.9 m
To
758.15 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:553.9-758.15
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very long polymetallic intersection at depth with weak silver grade, underscoring the scale of the mineralized system from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Strong Continuity
  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“2.43”

Context: 204.25

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 204.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
204.25 m
From
553.9 m
To
758.15 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:553.9-758.15
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very long polymetallic intersection at depth with very weak copper grade, underscoring the scale of the mineralized system from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Strong Continuity
  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 204.25

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: %Intercept: 51.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.65
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
51.5 m
From
553.9 m
To
605.4 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:553.9-605.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Long polymetallic intersection at depth with weak zinc grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Strong Continuity
  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.65”

Context: 51.50

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 51.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.58
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
51.5 m
From
553.9 m
To
605.4 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:553.9-605.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Long polymetallic intersection at depth with weak gold grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Strong Continuity
  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.58”

Context: 51.50

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 6.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 51.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
6.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
51.5 m
From
553.9 m
To
605.4 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:553.9-605.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Long polymetallic intersection at depth with weak silver grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Strong Continuity
  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“6.11”

Context: 51.50

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 51.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
51.5 m
From
553.9 m
To
605.4 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:553.9-605.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Long polymetallic intersection at depth with weak copper grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Strong Continuity
  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Context: 51.50

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.75
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.4 m
From
554.4 m
To
556.8 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:554.4-556.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak zinc grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“1.75”

Context: 2.40

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 5.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
5.89
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m
From
554.4 m
To
556.8 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:554.4-556.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional gold grade sub-interval, indicating very high-grade gold mineralization at depth.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional Grade
  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“5.89”

Context: 2.40

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 98.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
98.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m
From
554.4 m
To
556.8 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:554.4-556.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade sub-interval within the broader zone, indicating significant silver mineralization at depth.

Positive factors

  • Moderate Grade
  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“98.21”

Context: 2.40

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 1.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.28
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.4 m
From
554.4 m
To
556.8 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:554.4-556.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper grade sub-interval within the broader zone, indicating significant copper mineralization at depth.

Positive factors

  • Strong Grade
  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“1.28”

Context: 2.40

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 3.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
3.39
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.15 m
From
560.6 m
To
561.75 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:560.6-561.75
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak zinc grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“3.39”

Context: 1.15

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.15 m
From
560.6 m
To
561.75 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:560.6-561.75
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak gold grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: 1.15

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
2.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.15 m
From
560.6 m
To
561.75 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:560.6-561.75
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak silver grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“2.50”

Context: 1.15

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.15 m
From
560.6 m
To
561.75 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:560.6-561.75
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with very weak copper grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: 1.15

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 0.85Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.85
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.25 m
From
574.65 m
To
576.9 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:574.65-576.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak zinc grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.85”

Context: 2.25

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.25 m
From
574.65 m
To
576.9 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:574.65-576.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak gold grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.60”

Context: 2.25

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 1.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.25 m
From
574.65 m
To
576.9 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:574.65-576.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak silver grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“1.62”

Context: 2.25

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.25 m
From
574.65 m
To
576.9 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:574.65-576.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with very weak copper grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 2.25

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.35
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14.4 m
From
591 m
To
605.4 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:591-605.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak zinc grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“1.35”

Context: 14.40

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.84
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.4 m
From
591 m
To
605.4 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:591-605.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak gold grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.84”

Context: 14.40

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 3.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
3.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.4 m
From
591 m
To
605.4 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:591-605.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak silver grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“3.44”

Context: 14.40

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14.4 m
From
591 m
To
605.4 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:591-605.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with very weak copper grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 14.40

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.61Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.61
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.75 m
From
639.25 m
To
645 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:639.25-645
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak zinc grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“1.61”

Context: 5.75

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.75 m
From
639.25 m
To
645 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:639.25-645
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak gold grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.43”

Context: 5.75

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 1.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.75 m
From
639.25 m
To
645 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:639.25-645
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak silver grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“1.27”

Context: 5.75

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.75 m
From
639.25 m
To
645 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:639.25-645
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with very weak copper grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: 5.75

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.77Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.77
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10 m
From
655.5 m
To
665.5 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:655.5-665.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak zinc grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“1.77”

Context: 10.00

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
655.5 m
To
665.5 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:655.5-665.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak gold grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.41”

Context: 10.00

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 1.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.67
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
655.5 m
To
665.5 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:655.5-665.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak silver grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“1.67”

Context: 10.00

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10 m
From
655.5 m
To
665.5 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:655.5-665.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with very weak copper grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: 10.00

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 2.88Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
2.88
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
681.55 m
To
686.15 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:681.55-686.15
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak zinc grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“2.88”

Context: 4.60

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
681.55 m
To
686.15 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:681.55-686.15
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak gold grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.85”

Context: 4.60

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 1.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
681.55 m
To
686.15 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:681.55-686.15
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak silver grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“1.64”

Context: 4.60

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
681.55 m
To
686.15 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:681.55-686.15
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with very weak copper grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: 4.60

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 2.56Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
2.56
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.45 m
From
697.05 m
To
704.5 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:697.05-704.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak zinc grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“2.56”

Context: 7.45

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.45 m
From
697.05 m
To
704.5 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:697.05-704.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak gold grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.88”

Context: 7.45

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 3.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
3.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.45 m
From
697.05 m
To
704.5 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:697.05-704.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak silver grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“3.24”

Context: 7.45

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.45 m
From
697.05 m
To
704.5 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:697.05-704.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with very weak copper grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 7.45

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.93Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.93
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.5 m
From
715.5 m
To
722 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:715.5-722
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak zinc grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“1.93”

Context: 6.50

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.61
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.5 m
From
715.5 m
To
722 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:715.5-722
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak gold grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.61”

Context: 6.50

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.5 m
From
715.5 m
To
722 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:715.5-722
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak silver grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“1.70”

Context: 6.50

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.5 m
From
715.5 m
To
722 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:715.5-722
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with very weak copper grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: 6.50

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.7 m
From
730.6 m
To
732.3 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:730.6-732.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak zinc grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.29”

Context: 1.70

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.7 m
From
730.6 m
To
732.3 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:730.6-732.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak gold grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.26”

Context: 1.70

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.61
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.7 m
From
730.6 m
To
732.3 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:730.6-732.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak silver grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.61”

Context: 1.70

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.7 m
From
730.6 m
To
732.3 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:730.6-732.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with very weak copper grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 1.70

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
18.65 m
From
739.5 m
To
758.15 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:739.5-758.15
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak zinc grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 18.65

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.65 m
From
739.5 m
To
758.15 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:739.5-758.15
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak gold grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.95”

Context: 18.65

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 2.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
2.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.65 m
From
739.5 m
To
758.15 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:739.5-758.15
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak silver grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“2.31”

Context: 18.65

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
18.65 m
From
739.5 m
To
758.15 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:739.5-758.15
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with very weak copper grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: 18.65

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.78
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.4 m
From
774 m
To
778.4 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:774-778.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.78
Metal Eq. Unit
ZnEq (%)
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak ZnEq grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“1.78”

Context: 4.40

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.42
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.4 m
From
774 m
To
778.4 m
Hole Depth
834.7 m
Intercept Depth
498.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:774-778.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
542320
Northing
5532728
Elevation
390 m
Azimuth
130.49 °
Dip
-55.03 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.42
Metal Eq. Unit
AuEq (g/t)
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New polymetallic intersection at depth with weak AuEq grade, part of a broader mineralized system, from an extension hole.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Stale Metallurgical Report for Equivalent Assumptions

Evidence · table

“0.42”

Context: 4.40

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.95 m
From
522.25 m
To
524.2 m
Intercept Depth
522.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:522.25-524.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.27 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.27 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 5.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
5.81
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.95 m
From
522.25 m
To
524.2 m
Intercept Depth
522.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:522.25-524.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.81 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 5.81 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.81”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.95 m
From
522.25 m
To
524.2 m
Intercept Depth
522.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:522.25-524.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.97Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.97
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.95 m
From
522.25 m
To
524.2 m
Intercept Depth
522.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:522.25-524.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.97 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.8 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.97 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.97”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 204.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
204.25 m
From
553.9 m
To
758.15 m
Intercept Depth
553.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:553.9-758.15
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.05
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.35 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 71.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 2.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 204.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
2.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
204.25 m
From
553.9 m
To
758.15 m
Intercept Depth
553.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:553.9-758.15
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.05
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.43 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 496.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.43”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 204.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
204.25 m
From
553.9 m
To
758.15 m
Intercept Depth
553.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:553.9-758.15
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.05
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 8.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: %Intercept: 204.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.58
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
204.25 m
From
553.9 m
To
758.15 m
Intercept Depth
553.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:553.9-758.15
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.05
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.58 % zinc is strong against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 118.5 %·m is strong (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.58 % zinc is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.58”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 51.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.58
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
51.5 m
From
553.9 m
To
605.4 m
Intercept Depth
553.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:553.9-605.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.58 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 29.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.58”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 6.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 51.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
6.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
51.5 m
From
553.9 m
To
605.4 m
Intercept Depth
553.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:553.9-605.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.11 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 314.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.11”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 51.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
51.5 m
From
553.9 m
To
605.4 m
Intercept Depth
553.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:553.9-605.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 4.6 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.09 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: %Intercept: 51.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.65
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
51.5 m
From
553.9 m
To
605.4 m
Intercept Depth
553.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:553.9-605.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.65 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 33.5 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.65”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 5.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
5.89
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m
From
554.4 m
To
556.8 m
Intercept Depth
554.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:554.4-556.8
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
31.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.89 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.89”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 98.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
98.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m
From
554.4 m
To
556.8 m
Intercept Depth
554.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:554.4-556.8
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
31.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 98.21 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 235.7 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“98.21”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 1.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.28
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.4 m
From
554.4 m
To
556.8 m
Intercept Depth
554.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:554.4-556.8
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
31.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.28 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.1 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.28 % copper is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.28”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.75
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.4 m
From
554.4 m
To
556.8 m
Intercept Depth
554.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:554.4-556.8
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
31.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.75 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 4.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.75 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.75”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.15 m
From
560.6 m
To
561.75 m
Intercept Depth
560.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:560.6-561.75
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.06
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.15 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.15 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
2.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.15 m
From
560.6 m
To
561.75 m
Intercept Depth
560.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:560.6-561.75
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.06
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.50”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.15 m
From
560.6 m
To
561.75 m
Intercept Depth
560.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:560.6-561.75
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.06
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.06 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 3.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
3.39
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.15 m
From
560.6 m
To
561.75 m
Intercept Depth
560.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:560.6-561.75
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.06
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.39 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.9 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.39”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.25 m
From
574.65 m
To
576.9 m
Intercept Depth
574.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:574.65-576.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.17
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.6 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.60”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 1.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.25 m
From
574.65 m
To
576.9 m
Intercept Depth
574.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:574.65-576.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.17
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.62 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.62 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.62”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.25 m
From
574.65 m
To
576.9 m
Intercept Depth
574.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:574.65-576.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.17
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 0.85Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.85
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.25 m
From
574.65 m
To
576.9 m
Intercept Depth
574.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:574.65-576.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.17
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.85 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.9 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.85 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.85”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.84
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.4 m
From
591 m
To
605.4 m
Intercept Depth
591 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:591-605.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.62
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.84 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 12.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.84”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 3.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
3.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.4 m
From
591 m
To
605.4 m
Intercept Depth
591 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:591-605.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.62
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.44 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 49.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.44 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.44”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14.4 m
From
591 m
To
605.4 m
Intercept Depth
591 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:591-605.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.62
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.05 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.35
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14.4 m
From
591 m
To
605.4 m
Intercept Depth
591 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:591-605.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.62
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.35 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 19.4 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.35”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.75 m
From
639.25 m
To
645 m
Intercept Depth
639.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:639.25-645
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.2
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.43 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.43 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.43”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 1.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.75 m
From
639.25 m
To
645 m
Intercept Depth
639.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:639.25-645
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.2
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.27 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.27 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.27”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.75 m
From
639.25 m
To
645 m
Intercept Depth
639.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:639.25-645
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.2
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.61Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.61
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.75 m
From
639.25 m
To
645 m
Intercept Depth
639.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:639.25-645
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.2
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.61 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 9.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.61 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.61”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
655.5 m
To
665.5 m
Intercept Depth
655.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:655.5-665.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.29
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.41 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.41 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.41”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 1.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.67
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
655.5 m
To
665.5 m
Intercept Depth
655.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:655.5-665.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.29
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.67 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 16.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.67 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.67”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10 m
From
655.5 m
To
665.5 m
Intercept Depth
655.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:655.5-665.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.29
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.77Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.77
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10 m
From
655.5 m
To
665.5 m
Intercept Depth
655.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:655.5-665.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.29
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.77 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 17.7 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.77”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
681.55 m
To
686.15 m
Intercept Depth
681.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:681.55-686.15
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.93
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.85 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.85 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.85”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 1.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
681.55 m
To
686.15 m
Intercept Depth
681.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:681.55-686.15
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.93
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.64 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.64 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.64”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
681.55 m
To
686.15 m
Intercept Depth
681.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:681.55-686.15
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.93
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 2.88Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
2.88
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
681.55 m
To
686.15 m
Intercept Depth
681.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:681.55-686.15
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.93
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.88 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 13.2 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.88”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.45 m
From
697.05 m
To
704.5 m
Intercept Depth
697.05 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:697.05-704.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.9
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.88 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.88 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.88”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 3.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
3.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.45 m
From
697.05 m
To
704.5 m
Intercept Depth
697.05 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:697.05-704.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.9
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.24 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.24 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.24”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.45 m
From
697.05 m
To
704.5 m
Intercept Depth
697.05 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:697.05-704.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.9
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 2.56Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
2.56
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.45 m
From
697.05 m
To
704.5 m
Intercept Depth
697.05 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:697.05-704.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.9
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.56 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 19.1 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.56”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.61
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.5 m
From
715.5 m
To
722 m
Intercept Depth
715.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:715.5-722
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.17
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.61 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.61 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.61”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.5 m
From
715.5 m
To
722 m
Intercept Depth
715.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:715.5-722
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.17
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.70”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.5 m
From
715.5 m
To
722 m
Intercept Depth
715.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:715.5-722
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.17
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.93Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.93
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.5 m
From
715.5 m
To
722 m
Intercept Depth
715.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:715.5-722
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.17
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.93 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 12.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.93 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.93”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.7 m
From
730.6 m
To
732.3 m
Intercept Depth
730.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:730.6-732.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.25
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.26 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.26 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.26”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.61
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.7 m
From
730.6 m
To
732.3 m
Intercept Depth
730.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:730.6-732.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.25
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.61 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.61 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.61”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.7 m
From
730.6 m
To
732.3 m
Intercept Depth
730.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:730.6-732.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.25
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.7 m
From
730.6 m
To
732.3 m
Intercept Depth
730.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:730.6-732.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.25
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.29 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.29 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.29”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.65 m
From
739.5 m
To
758.15 m
Intercept Depth
739.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:739.5-758.15
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.72
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.95 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.95”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 2.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
2.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.65 m
From
739.5 m
To
758.15 m
Intercept Depth
739.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:739.5-758.15
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.72
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.31 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 43.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.31 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.31”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
18.65 m
From
739.5 m
To
758.15 m
Intercept Depth
739.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:739.5-758.15
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.72
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
18.65 m
From
739.5 m
To
758.15 m
Intercept Depth
739.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:739.5-758.15
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.72
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.9 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.4 m
From
774 m
To
778.4 m
Intercept Depth
774 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:774-778.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.78
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.44 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.44 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.44”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 0.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.87
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.4 m
From
774 m
To
778.4 m
Intercept Depth
774 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:774-778.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.78
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.87 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.87 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.87”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.4 m
From
774 m
To
778.4 m
Intercept Depth
774 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:774-778.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.78
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.4 m
From
774 m
To
778.4 m
Intercept Depth
774 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:774-778.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.78
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.11 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.