Gold Springs Resource A Significant High-Grade Extension of the North Jumbo Deposit

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Gold Springs Resource Corp.
Ticker
GRC
Exchange
TSX
Region
Nevada and Utah
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver
Document categories
Drill results, Resource update
Extracted
2026-09-16 03:25:33 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Gold Springs Resource Corp. announced new drill results from its Gold Springs project in Nevada and Utah, confirming a significant 425-meter high-grade southward extension of the North Jumbo deposit. Highlights include 2.45 g/t gold equivalent over 22.9 meters, with a sub-interval of 3.98 g/t gold equivalent over 12.2 meters in hole J-22-020. The company also provided an update on the North Jumbo Resource, which stands at 309,470 ounces of gold and 6,718,283 ounces of silver in the Measured and Indicated categories, based on drilling up to 2021.

Reasoning: The document reports new high-grade drill results that significantly extend the North Jumbo deposit to the south, confirming a new structural block. The results include strong grades over substantial widths, and the company provides good QA/QC disclosure and QP sign-off. The resource update is provided for context and is historical.

Positive factors

  • Significant high-grade extension of the North Jumbo deposit
  • New drilling extends mineralization by 425 meters to the south
  • High-grade intercepts, including 3.52 g/t Au over 12.2 meters
  • QA/QC procedures disclosed with certified lab and QP sign-off
  • True width estimated to be 60-100% of reported length

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 34

Classification and evidence

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The document reports a 'significant 425 meters higher-grade southward extension' of the North Jumbo deposit.

Evidence · text

“significant 425 meters higher-grade southward extension of the North Jumbo deposit”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes detailed QA/QC procedures, mentioning standards, blanks, and duplicates, and a certified laboratory.

Evidence · text

“Standards and blanks are submitted into the sample stream at the rate of 15% for QA/QC purposes. In addition, the laboratory also includes duplicates of samples, standards and blanks.”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Randall Moore, Executive Vice President of Exploration, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the technical information and verified the data.

Evidence · text

“Randall Moore, Executive Vice President of Exploration, Gold Springs Resource Corp., is the Company's designated Qualified Person for this news release within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects . He has approved the scientific or technical information in this release and has verified the data disclosed in this release for its geological reasonableness, checked all the inputs and verified the analytical data through an analysis of the blanks and standards submitted with the drill-chip samples.”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The resource estimate is stated to be based on an 'NI 43-101 Technical Report'.

Evidence · text

“NI 43-101 Technical Report - Gold Springs Project, Utah-Nevada, USA”

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: The resource estimate explicitly states a '0.25 g/t gold cutoff'.

Evidence · text

“0.25 g/t gold cutoff”

True Width Estimatedneutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The document states that 'True thickness is estimated to be 60-100% of reported length', indicating an estimate rather than a precise true width.

Evidence · text

“True thickness is estimated to be 60-100% of reported length.”

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The resource update includes an 'Inferred' category, which is a speculative resource classification.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: 1,725

Historical Estimate Onlynegative

Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.

Why it applies: The resource estimate is explicitly stated to be 'based on drilling up to 2021 and without results from 2022-2023', indicating it is a prior estimate referenced for context.

Evidence · text

“North Jumbo Resource based on drilling to 2021 and without results from 2022-2023”

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: The effective date of the resource estimate is June 13, 2022, which is over a year old at the time of this announcement.

Evidence · text

“effective date of June 13, 2022”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 34. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (32)

J-22-020Gold Springs · goldGrade: 3.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J-22-020
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
3.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
129.5 m
To
141.7 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
7.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
J-22-020:129.5-141.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Jumbo
Easting
761004
Northing
4198028
CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11
Elevation
2058 m
Azimuth
240 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.98
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval represents a very strong intercept with high gold equivalent grade over a significant width, indicating a high-grade zone within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold equivalent grade
  • Strong intercept length
  • High GT product

Evidence · table

“3.52”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

J-22-020Gold Springs · silverGrade: 32.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J-22-020
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
32.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
129.5 m
To
141.7 m
Hole Depth
219.5 m
Intercept Depth
7.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
J-22-020:129.5-141.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Jumbo
Easting
761004
Northing
4198028
CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11
Elevation
2058 m
Azimuth
240 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.98
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval represents a very strong intercept with high silver grade over a significant width, indicating a high-grade zone within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade
  • Strong intercept length
  • High GT product

Evidence · table

“32.8”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

J-22-014Gold Springs · goldGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J-22-014
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
0.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.2 m
From
27.4 m
To
36.6 m
Intercept Depth
27.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
J-22-014:27.4-36.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.44
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.39 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.39”

Context: J-22-014

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

J-22-014Gold Springs · silverGrade: 3.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J-22-014
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
3.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.2 m
From
27.4 m
To
36.6 m
Intercept Depth
27.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
J-22-014:27.4-36.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.44
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 31.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.4”

Context: J-22-014

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andGold Springs · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
0.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
51.8 m
To
57.9 m
Intercept Depth
51.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:51.8-57.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.58
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.46 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.46”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andGold Springs · silverGrade: 8.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
8.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
51.8 m
To
57.9 m
Intercept Depth
51.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:51.8-57.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.58
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 54.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 8.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.9”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

J-22-015Gold Springs · goldGrade: 0.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J-22-015
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
0.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
13.7 m
To
21.3 m
Intercept Depth
13.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
J-22-015:13.7-21.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.94
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.68 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.68”

Context: J-22-015

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

J-22-015Gold Springs · silverGrade: 18.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J-22-015
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
18.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
13.7 m
To
21.3 m
Intercept Depth
13.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
J-22-015:13.7-21.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.94
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 141.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 18.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“18.6”

Context: J-22-015

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

J-22-016Gold Springs · goldGrade: 0.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J-22-016
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
0.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
114.3 m
To
117.3 m
Intercept Depth
114.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
J-22-016:114.3-117.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.07
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.53 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.53”

Context: J-22-016

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

J-22-016Gold Springs · silverGrade: 38.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J-22-016
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
38.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
114.3 m
To
117.3 m
Intercept Depth
114.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
J-22-016:114.3-117.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.07
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 38.7 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 116.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“38.7”

Context: J-22-016

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andGold Springs · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
138.7 m
To
147.8 m
Intercept Depth
138.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:138.7-147.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.69
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.57 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.57”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andGold Springs · silverGrade: 8.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
8.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
138.7 m
To
147.8 m
Intercept Depth
138.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:138.7-147.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.69
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 79.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 8.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.7”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

J-22-017Gold Springs · goldGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J-22-017
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
0.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.7 m
From
91.4 m
To
99.1 m
Intercept Depth
91.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
J-22-017:91.4-99.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.47
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.36 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.36”

Context: J-22-017

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

J-22-017Gold Springs · silverGrade: 8.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J-22-017
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
8.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.7 m
From
91.4 m
To
99.1 m
Intercept Depth
91.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
J-22-017:91.4-99.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.47
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 63.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 8.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.2”

Context: J-22-017

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

J-22-018Gold Springs · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J-22-018
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
0.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.1 m
From
25.9 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
25.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
J-22-018:25.9-29
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.58
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.56 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.56”

Context: J-22-018

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

J-22-018Gold Springs · silverGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J-22-018
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.1 m
From
25.9 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
25.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
J-22-018:25.9-29
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.58
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.1”

Context: J-22-018

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andGold Springs · goldGrade: 1.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
1.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
51.8 m
To
53.3 m
Intercept Depth
51.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:51.8-53.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.24
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.22 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.22”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andGold Springs · silverGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
51.8 m
To
53.3 m
Intercept Depth
51.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:51.8-53.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.24
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.1”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

J-22-19Gold Springs · goldGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J-22-19
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
1.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
45.7 m
To
50.3 m
Intercept Depth
45.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
J-22-19:45.7-50.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.36
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.3”

Context: J-22-19

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

J-22-19Gold Springs · silverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J-22-19
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
45.7 m
To
50.3 m
Intercept Depth
45.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
J-22-19:45.7-50.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.36
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 18.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4”

Context: J-22-19

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andGold Springs · goldGrade: 0.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
0.66
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
94.5 m
To
97.5 m
Intercept Depth
94.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:94.5-97.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.03
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.66 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.66”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andGold Springs · silverGrade: 26.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
26.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
94.5 m
To
97.5 m
Intercept Depth
94.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:94.5-97.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.03
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 26.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 80.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 26.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“26.8”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

J-22-020Gold Springs · goldGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J-22-020
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
0.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.2 m
From
7.6 m
To
16.8 m
Intercept Depth
7.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
J-22-020:7.6-16.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.84
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.47 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 4.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.47”

Context: J-22-020

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

J-22-020Gold Springs · silverGrade: 26.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
J-22-020
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
26.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.2 m
From
7.6 m
To
16.8 m
Intercept Depth
7.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
J-22-020:7.6-16.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.84
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 26.8 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 246.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“26.8”

Context: J-22-020

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andGold Springs · goldGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
0.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.2 m
From
47.2 m
To
56.4 m
Intercept Depth
47.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:47.2-56.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.89
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.62 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.62”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andGold Springs · silverGrade: 19.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
19.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.2 m
From
47.2 m
To
56.4 m
Intercept Depth
47.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:47.2-56.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.89
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 181.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 19.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“19.7”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andGold Springs · goldGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
0.58
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
108.2 m
To
117.3 m
Intercept Depth
108.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:108.2-117.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.81
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.58 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.58”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andGold Springs · silverGrade: 16.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
16.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
108.2 m
To
117.3 m
Intercept Depth
108.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:108.2-117.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.81
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 152.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 16.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“16.8”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andGold Springs · goldGrade: 2.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
2.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.9 m
From
128 m
To
150.9 m
Intercept Depth
128 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:128-150.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.45
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.12 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 48.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 2.12 g/t gold is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.12”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andGold Springs · silverGrade: 23.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
23.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.9 m
From
128 m
To
150.9 m
Intercept Depth
128 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:128-150.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.45
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23.4 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 535.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“23.4”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inc.Gold Springs · goldGrade: 3.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
3.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
129.5 m
To
141.7 m
Intercept Depth
129.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:129.5-141.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.98
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.52 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 42.9 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.52 g/t gold is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.52”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inc.Gold Springs · silverGrade: 32.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
GRC

Geometry

Grade
32.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
129.5 m
To
141.7 m
Intercept Depth
129.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:129.5-141.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

CRS
UTM NAD 27 Z11

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.98
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 32.8 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 400.2 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“32.8”

Context: inc.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Resource Estimates (2)

inferredGold Springs · goldTonnes: 1725Grade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada and Utah
Ticker
GRC

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Randall Moore
Resource group id
resource:0b14a4a0fb7e90fa6516
Deposit or zone
North Jumbo

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1725
Grade
0.38
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.25
Cutoff Unit
g/t gold

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2022-06-13

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-06-13T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is an Inferred resource for gold, indicating lower confidence in the estimate, and it is historical, provided for context rather than being a new update. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • QP/CP Signed
  • Cut-off Disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred Resource
  • Stale Estimate

Evidence · table

“0.38”

Context: 1,725

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

inferredGold Springs · silverTonnes: 1725Grade: 4.51Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Gold Springs
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada and Utah
Ticker
GRC

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Randall Moore
Resource group id
resource:0b14a4a0fb7e90fa6516
Deposit or zone
North Jumbo

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1725
Grade
4.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.25
Cutoff Unit
g/t gold

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2022-06-13

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-06-13T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is an Inferred resource for gold, indicating lower confidence in the estimate, and it is historical, provided for context rather than being a new update. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • NI 43-101 Compliant
  • QP/CP Signed
  • Cut-off Disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred Resource
  • Stale Estimate

Evidence · table

“4.51”

Context: 1,725

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.