Gold Springs Resource Continues to Expand the South Jumbo Deposit
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Gold Springs Resource Corp.
- Ticker
- GRC
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-09-16 03:25:56 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Gold Springs Resource Corp. announced positive assay results from its South Jumbo deposit, extending gold mineralization 200 meters to the north. Highlights include 1.93 g/t gold equivalent over 1.5 meters and 1.10 g/t gold equivalent over 6.1 meters. The company also reiterated its existing NI 43-101 compliant resource estimate for the South and North Jumbo deposits, which totals 524,000 ounces of gold and 8,811,000 ounces of silver.
Reasoning: The announcement reports positive drill results that extend the South Jumbo deposit, confirming mineralization continuity and potential for growth. The results are supported by robust QA/QC and a compliant resource estimate, although the new drilling is not yet integrated into the resource.
Positive factors
- Drill results extend gold mineralization 200 meters further north at South Jumbo, indicating potential for deposit expansion.
- High-grade intercepts were reported, including 1.93 g/t AuEq over 1.5m and 1.10 g/t AuEq over 6.1m.
- Comprehensive QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including certified lab use and QP sign-off.
- The resource estimate is NI 43-101 compliant, providing a strong foundation for the project.
Negative factors
- True thickness is estimated to be 60-100% of reported length, not precisely stated, which introduces some uncertainty.
- The resource update is based on drilling up to 2021, meaning the new drill results are not yet incorporated into the estimate.
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 24
Classification and evidence
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The drill results extend the South Jumbo deposit 200 meters further north where it remains open.
Evidence · text
“expand our South Jumbo deposit 200 meters further north where it remains open”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details QA/QC procedures including submission of standards and blanks, laboratory duplicates, and review of check assays.
Evidence · text
“Standards and blanks are submitted into the sample stream at the rate of 15% for QA/QC purposes. In addition, the laboratory also includes duplicates of samples, standards and blanks. The results of these check assays are reviewed prior to the release of data.”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Randall Moore, VP of Gold Springs Resource Corp., is the Company's designated Qualified Person and has approved the scientific or technical information.
Evidence · text
“Randall Moore, VP of Gold Springs Resource Corp., is the Company's designated Qualified Person for this news release within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. He has approved the scientific or technical information in this release”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: True thickness is estimated to be 60-100% of reported length, indicating that only downhole length is directly reported.
Evidence · text
“True thickness is estimated to be 60-100% of reported length.”
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: The mineral resource estimate is based on an 'NI 43-101 Technical Report - Gold Springs Project, Utah-Nevada, USA'.
Evidence · text
“Mineral Resource Estimate NI 43-101 Technical Report - Gold Springs Project, Utah-Nevada, USA”
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: The document includes a detailed table of the South and North Jumbo Resources based on drilling to 2021, referencing a prior mineral resource estimate.
Evidence · text
“South and North Jumbo Resources based on drilling to 2021 and without results from 2022-2023 Mineral Resource Estimate NI 43-101 Technical Report - Gold Springs Project, Utah-Nevada, USA" dated July 11, 2022, with an effective date of June 13, 2022”
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: The resource table includes 'Measured' category for both South Jumbo and North Jumbo deposits.
Evidence · table
“Measured”
Context: South Jumbo
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: The resource table includes 'Indicated' category for both South Jumbo and North Jumbo deposits.
Evidence · table
“Indicated”
Context: South Jumbo
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: The resource table includes 'Inferred' category for both South Jumbo and North Jumbo deposits.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: South Jumbo
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 24. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (22)
E-22-024Gold Springs · goldGrade: 1.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- E-22-024
- Project
- Gold Springs
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 163.1 m
- To
- 164.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 213.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- E-22-024:163.1-164.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- South Jumbo
- Easting
- 760495
- Northing
- 4196900
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
- Elevation
- 1983 m
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemical
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong gold intercept contributing significantly to the expansion of the South Jumbo deposit, supported by strong QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Strong gold intercept contributing to the expansion of the South Jumbo deposit.
- Comprehensive QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- True thickness is an estimate.
Evidence · table
“1.29”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
E-22-024Gold Springs · silverGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- E-22-024
- Project
- Gold Springs
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 163.1 m
- To
- 164.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 213.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- E-22-024:163.1-164.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- South Jumbo
- Easting
- 760495
- Northing
- 4196900
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
- Elevation
- 1983 m
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemical
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver intercept alongside gold, contributing to the overall expansion of the South Jumbo deposit.
Positive factors
- Intercept contributes to the expansion of the South Jumbo deposit.
- Comprehensive QA/QC procedures disclosed.
Negative factors
- Grade is moderate.
- True thickness is an estimate.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
E-22-021Gold Springs · goldGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- E-22-021
- Project
- Gold Springs
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.44
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 137.2 m
- To
- 141.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 137.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- E-22-021:137.2-141.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemical
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.48
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.44 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.44”
Context: E-22-021
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
E-22-021Gold Springs · silverGrade: 6.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- E-22-021
- Project
- Gold Springs
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 137.2 m
- To
- 141.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 137.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- E-22-021:137.2-141.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemical
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.48
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 27.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.2”
Context: E-22-021
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andGold Springs · goldGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Gold Springs
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 169.2 m
- To
- 173.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 169.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:169.2-173.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemical
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.54
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.51 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.51”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andGold Springs · silverGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Gold Springs
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 169.2 m
- To
- 173.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 169.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:169.2-173.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemical
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.54
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 20.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.5”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andGold Springs · goldGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Gold Springs
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 181.4 m
- To
- 189 m
- Intercept Depth
- 181.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:181.4-189
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemical
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.38
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.34 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.34”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andGold Springs · silverGrade: 6.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Gold Springs
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 181.4 m
- To
- 189 m
- Intercept Depth
- 181.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:181.4-189
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemical
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.38
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 47.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.2”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andGold Springs · goldGrade: 0.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Gold Springs
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.71
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 211.8 m
- To
- 214.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 211.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:211.8-214.9
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemical
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.72
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.71 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.71”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andGold Springs · silverGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Gold Springs
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 211.8 m
- To
- 214.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 211.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:211.8-214.9
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemical
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.72
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
E-22-022Gold Springs · goldGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- E-22-022
- Project
- Gold Springs
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 134.1 m
- To
- 140.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 134.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- E-22-022:134.1-140.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemical
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.07 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.07”
Context: E-22-022
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
E-22-022Gold Springs · silverGrade: 3.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- E-22-022
- Project
- Gold Springs
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 134.1 m
- To
- 140.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 134.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- E-22-022:134.1-140.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemical
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 23.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.9”
Context: E-22-022
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andGold Springs · goldGrade: 0.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Gold Springs
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.93
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 202.7 m
- To
- 205.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 202.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:202.7-205.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemical
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.96
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.93 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.93”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andGold Springs · silverGrade: 4.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Gold Springs
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 202.7 m
- To
- 205.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 202.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:202.7-205.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemical
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.96
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 13.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.4”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andGold Springs · goldGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Gold Springs
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 213.4 m
- To
- 219.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 213.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:213.4-219.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemical
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.57
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.55 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.55”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andGold Springs · silverGrade: 3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Gold Springs
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 213.4 m
- To
- 219.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 213.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:213.4-219.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemical
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.57
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 18.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
E-22-023Gold Springs · goldGrade: 1.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- E-22-023
- Project
- Gold Springs
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.92
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 166.1 m
- To
- 167.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 166.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- E-22-023:166.1-167.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemical
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.93
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.92 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.92”
Context: E-22-023
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
E-22-023Gold Springs · silverGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- E-22-023
- Project
- Gold Springs
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 166.1 m
- To
- 167.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 166.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- E-22-023:166.1-167.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemical
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.93
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.8”
Context: E-22-023
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andGold Springs · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Gold Springs
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 196.6 m
- To
- 204.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 196.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:196.6-204.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemical
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.58
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.57 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 4.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.57”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andGold Springs · silverGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Gold Springs
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 196.6 m
- To
- 204.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 196.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:196.6-204.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemical
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.58
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andGold Springs · goldGrade: 1.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Gold Springs
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- From
- 256 m
- To
- 257.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 256 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:256-257.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemical
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.24
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.22 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.22”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
andGold Springs · silverGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Gold Springs
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GRC
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- From
- 256 m
- To
- 257.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 256 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:256-257.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- CRS
- UTM NAD 27 Z11
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemical
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.24
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.2”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Resource Estimates (2)
inferredGold Springs · goldTonnes: 1725Grade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Springs
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2022-06-13T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Randall Moore
- Resource group id
- resource:d9f8f690bc93d90ed530
- Deposit or zone
- South Jumbo
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1725
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t gold
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2022-06-13
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemical
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- inferred
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Lower confidence Inferred gold resource, compliant with NI 43-101, but requires further drilling to upgrade. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- NI 43-101 compliant and QP signed.
- Contributes to overall gold ounces.
Negative factors
- Lower confidence Inferred category.
- Estimate is based on drilling up to 2021, not incorporating recent results.
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: 1,725
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
inferredGold Springs · silverTonnes: 1725Grade: 4.51Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Springs
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada and Utah, USA
- Ticker
- GRC
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2022-06-13T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Randall Moore
- Resource group id
- resource:d9f8f690bc93d90ed530
- Deposit or zone
- South Jumbo
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1725
- Grade
- 4.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t gold
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2022-06-13
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemical
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- inferred
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Lower confidence Inferred gold resource, compliant with NI 43-101, but requires further drilling to upgrade. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- NI 43-101 compliant and QP signed.
- Contributes to overall gold ounces.
Negative factors
- Lower confidence Inferred category.
- Estimate is based on drilling up to 2021, not incorporating recent results.
Evidence · table
“4.51”
Context: 1,725
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.