Golden Arrow Advances Four Near-Surface Gold Targets Across 10km at Atakama Project and Plans First Drill Program
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Golden Arrow Resources Corporation
- Ticker
- GRG
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-16 02:32:17 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Golden Arrow Resources has advanced four near-surface gold targets at its Atakama Gold Project in Chile, reporting strong gold grades from both trenching and rock chip samples. Highlights include trench intercepts up to 110.2m at 0.34 g/t Au and rock chip samples up to 29.72 g/t Au. The company plans to initiate its first drill program at the Paula target in September, subject to financing, to test these zones at depth.
Reasoning: Golden Arrow reports encouraging surface gold results from trenching and high-grade rock chip sampling across four targets at its Atakama project, leading to plans for a first drill program at the Paula target, indicating potential for a near-surface gold system.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold rock chip samples from multiple targets (up to 29.72 g/t Au)
- Significant widths of gold mineralization identified in trenching (up to 110.2m)
- Multiple targets (Paula, Lolita Norte, Dos Marias, Cerro Sur) advanced across 10km
- Planned initial drill program at the most advanced target (Paula)
- QA/QC procedures disclosed with named laboratories and QP sign-off
- Targets remain open in multiple directions, indicating expansion potential
Negative factors
- Trenching results were previously reported (January 12, 2026), reducing novelty
- Rock chip samples are selective and may not be representative of overall mineralization
- True widths of trench intercepts are not stated
- One trench (Paula West 10) returned no significant intervals
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 36
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release states that 'The Company follows industry standard procedures for the work carried out at the Atakama Project, with a QA/QC program. Blank and standard samples were inserted in each batch of samples sent to the laboratory for analysis.' and names ALS and 3AAA laboratories.
Evidence · text
“The Company follows industry standard procedures for the work carried out at the Atakama Project, with a QA/QC program. Blank and standard samples were inserted in each batch of samples sent to the laboratory for analysis.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The trench intercepts are reported as interval lengths (e.g., '33.2 m') without any mention of true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“Interval (m)”
Context: 33.2
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: The trenching results from Table 1 are explicitly stated as 'originally reported January 12, 2026', indicating they are not new assays.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 summarizes trench results as originally reported January 12, 2026 .”
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: Rock chip sample from Lolita Norte returned 20.5 g/t Au, which is well above the 5 g/t exceptional threshold for gold.
Evidence · text
“0.35 m @ 20.5 g/t Au”
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: Rock chip sample from Cerro Sur returned 29.72 g/t Au, which is well above the 5 g/t exceptional threshold for gold.
Evidence · text
“0.45 m grading 29.72 g/t Au”
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: Rock chip sample from Cerro Sur returned 10.81 g/t Au, which is well above the 5 g/t exceptional threshold for gold.
Evidence · text
“1.7 m grading 10.81 g/t Au”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The Paula target is explicitly stated as 'open in all directions', indicating potential for mineralization extension.
Evidence · text
“The target is open in all directions.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: The document reports trench intervals without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing these intervals.
Evidence · table
“Interval (m)”
Context: 33.2
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 36. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (36)
Paula Trench 1Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula Trench 1
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 33.2 m
- From
- 15.1 m
- To
- 48.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This trench intercept shows a wide zone of very low-grade gold, which is below economic thresholds and is from a previously reported program.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.18 g/t Au) below weak threshold
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: 33.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula Trench 2Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 71.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula Trench 2
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 71.5 m
- From
- 31 m
- To
- 102.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This trench intercept shows a very wide zone of very low-grade gold, which is below economic thresholds and is from a previously reported program.
Positive factors
- Wide intercept length (71.5m)
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.28 g/t Au) below weak threshold
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“0.28”
Context: 71.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula Trench 2Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula Trench 2
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 32.6 m
- From
- 61 m
- To
- 93.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval from a trench shows a weak gold grade over a moderate width, from a previously reported program.
Positive factors
- Intercept grade (0.34 g/t Au) meets weak threshold
Negative factors
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“0.34”
Context: 32.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula Trench 3Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 97.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula Trench 3
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 97.5 m
- From
- 5 m
- To
- 102.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This trench intercept shows a very wide zone of very low-grade gold, which is below economic thresholds and is from a previously reported program.
Positive factors
- Very wide intercept length (97.5m)
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.27 g/t Au) below weak threshold
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“0.27”
Context: 97.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula Trench 3Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula Trench 3
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17.6 m
- From
- 25.6 m
- To
- 43.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval from a trench shows a weak gold grade over a narrow width, from a previously reported program.
Positive factors
- Intercept grade (0.43 g/t Au) meets weak threshold
Negative factors
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“0.43”
Context: 17.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula Trench 4Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 57.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula Trench 4
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 57.9 m
- From
- 22.8 m
- To
- 80.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This trench intercept shows a wide zone of very low-grade gold, which is below economic thresholds and is from a previously reported program.
Positive factors
- Wide intercept length (57.9m)
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.27 g/t Au) below weak threshold
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“0.27”
Context: 57.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula Trench 4Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula Trench 4
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.5 m
- From
- 45.5 m
- To
- 64 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval from a trench shows a weak gold grade over a narrow width, from a previously reported program.
Positive factors
- Intercept grade (0.52 g/t Au) meets weak threshold
Negative factors
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“0.52”
Context: 18.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula Trench 11Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 92.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula Trench 11
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 92.2 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 92.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This trench intercept shows a very wide zone of very low-grade gold, which is at the lower bound of the weak threshold and is from a previously reported program.
Positive factors
- Very wide intercept length (92.2m)
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.30 g/t Au) at the lower bound of weak threshold
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: 92.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula Trench 11Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula Trench 11
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.4 m
- From
- 75.8 m
- To
- 88.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval from a trench shows a moderate gold grade over a narrow width, from a previously reported program.
Positive factors
- Intercept grade (1.07 g/t Au) meets moderate threshold
Negative factors
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“1.07”
Context: 12.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula Trench 12Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula Trench 12
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 23.9 m
- From
- 6 m
- To
- 29.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This trench intercept shows a very low-grade gold over a moderate width, which is below economic thresholds and is from a previously reported program.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.21 g/t Au) below weak threshold
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“0.21”
Context: 23.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula Trench 12Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 34.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula Trench 12
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 34.7 m
- From
- 43.1 m
- To
- 77.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This trench intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a good width, from a previously reported program, indicating potential.
Positive factors
- Intercept grade (1.10 g/t Au) meets moderate threshold
- Good intercept width (34.7m)
Negative factors
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“1.10”
Context: 34.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula Trench 13Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula Trench 13
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 32.9 m
- From
- 14.3 m
- To
- 47.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This trench intercept shows a gold grade approaching the moderate threshold over a good width, from a previously reported program.
Positive factors
- Intercept grade (0.91 g/t Au) approaches moderate threshold
- Good intercept width (32.9m)
Negative factors
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“0.91”
Context: 32.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula Trench 13Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula Trench 13
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20.2 m
- From
- 27.1 m
- To
- 47.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval from a trench shows a moderate gold grade over a good width, from a previously reported program, indicating potential.
Positive factors
- Intercept grade (1.10 g/t Au) meets moderate threshold
- Good intercept width (20.2m)
Negative factors
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“1.10”
Context: 20.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula Trench 14Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 76.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula Trench 14
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 76.7 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 76.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This trench intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a very wide interval, from a previously reported program, indicating significant potential.
Positive factors
- Intercept grade (1.01 g/t Au) meets moderate threshold
- Very wide intercept length (76.7m)
Negative factors
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“1.01”
Context: 76.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula Trench 14Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula Trench 14
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 26.6 m
- From
- 15.8 m
- To
- 42.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval from a trench shows a strong moderate gold grade over a good width, from a previously reported program, indicating significant potential.
Positive factors
- Intercept grade (1.65 g/t Au) is strong within moderate threshold
- Good intercept width (26.6m)
Negative factors
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“1.65”
Context: 26.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula Trench 15Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 73.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula Trench 15
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 73.4 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 73.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This trench intercept shows a gold grade approaching the moderate threshold over a very wide interval, from a previously reported program.
Positive factors
- Intercept grade (0.87 g/t Au) approaches moderate threshold
- Very wide intercept length (73.4m)
Negative factors
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“0.87”
Context: 73.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula Trench 15Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula Trench 15
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atakama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20.2 m
- From
- 22.6 m
- To
- 42.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval from a trench shows a strong gold grade over a good width, from a previously reported program, indicating significant potential.
Positive factors
- Intercept grade (2.09 g/t Au) meets strong threshold
- Good intercept width (20.2m)
Negative factors
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“2.09”
Context: 20.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula Trench 16Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula Trench 16
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.44
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 38.7 m
- From
- 4 m
- To
- 42.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This trench intercept shows a strong moderate gold grade over a good width, from a previously reported program, indicating potential.
Positive factors
- Intercept grade (1.44 g/t Au) is strong within moderate threshold
- Good intercept width (38.7m)
Negative factors
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“1.44”
Context: 38.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula Trench 16Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula Trench 16
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.24
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.6 m
- From
- 20.2 m
- To
- 42.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval from a trench shows a strong gold grade over a good width, from a previously reported program, indicating significant potential.
Positive factors
- Intercept grade (2.24 g/t Au) meets strong threshold
- Good intercept width (22.6m)
Negative factors
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“2.24”
Context: 22.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula Trench 17Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 110.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula Trench 17
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 110.2 m
- From
- 1.5 m
- To
- 111.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This trench intercept shows an exceptionally wide zone of low-grade gold, which is at the lower bound of the weak threshold and is from a previously reported program.
Positive factors
- Exceptional intercept width (110.2m)
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.34 g/t Au) at the lower bound of weak threshold
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“0.34”
Context: 110.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula Trench 17Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula Trench 17
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 23.6 m
- From
- 13.2 m
- To
- 36.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval from a trench shows a weak gold grade over a moderate width, from a previously reported program.
Positive factors
- Intercept grade (0.48 g/t Au) meets weak threshold
Negative factors
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“0.48”
Context: 23.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula Trench 17Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula Trench 17
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.44
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.4 m
- From
- 60.9 m
- To
- 79.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval from a trench shows a weak gold grade over a narrow width, from a previously reported program.
Positive factors
- Intercept grade (0.44 g/t Au) meets weak threshold
Negative factors
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“0.44”
Context: 18.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula Trench 17Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula Trench 17
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.45
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.4 m
- From
- 85.3 m
- To
- 98.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval from a trench shows a weak gold grade over a narrow width, from a previously reported program.
Positive factors
- Intercept grade (0.45 g/t Au) meets weak threshold
Negative factors
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“0.45”
Context: 13.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula West Trench 5Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 47.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula West Trench 5
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 47.5 m
- From
- 6.8 m
- To
- 54.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This trench intercept shows a wide zone of very low-grade gold, which is below economic thresholds and is from a previously reported program.
Positive factors
- Wide intercept length (47.5m)
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.16 g/t Au) below weak threshold
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: 47.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula West Trench 6Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 66.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula West Trench 6
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 66.4 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 66.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This trench intercept shows a wide zone of very low-grade gold, which is below economic thresholds and is from a previously reported program.
Positive factors
- Wide intercept length (66.4m)
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.19 g/t Au) below weak threshold
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“0.19”
Context: 66.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula West Trench 6Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula West Trench 6
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.4 m
- From
- 46.6 m
- To
- 57 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval from a trench shows a weak gold grade over a narrow width, from a previously reported program.
Positive factors
- Intercept grade (0.46 g/t Au) meets weak threshold
Negative factors
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“0.46”
Context: 10.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula West Trench 7Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 31.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula West Trench 7
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 31.2 m
- From
- 2 m
- To
- 33.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This trench intercept shows a good width of very low-grade gold, which is below economic thresholds and is from a previously reported program.
Positive factors
- Good intercept width (31.2m)
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.26 g/t Au) below weak threshold
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“0.26”
Context: 31.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula West Trench 8Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula West Trench 8
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.3 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 22.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This trench intercept shows a very low-grade gold over a moderate width, which is below economic thresholds and is from a previously reported program.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.19 g/t Au) below weak threshold
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“0.19”
Context: 22.3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula West Trench 8Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula West Trench 8
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.5 m
- From
- 13.8 m
- To
- 22.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval from a trench shows a weak gold grade over a narrow width, from a previously reported program.
Positive factors
- Intercept grade (0.34 g/t Au) meets weak threshold
Negative factors
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“0.34”
Context: 8.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Paula West Trench 9Atakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 54.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Paula West Trench 9
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 54.7 m
- From
- 12.5 m
- To
- 67.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This trench intercept shows a wide zone of very low-grade gold, which is below economic thresholds and is from a previously reported program.
Positive factors
- Wide intercept length (54.7m)
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.16 g/t Au) below weak threshold
- Intercept is from historical data re-release
- True width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: 54.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Lolita Norte Rock Chip SampleAtakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 4.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Lolita Norte Rock Chip Sample
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade rock chip sample indicates strong gold mineralization at surface, warranting further follow-up.
Positive factors
- High gold grade (4.75 g/t Au) approaching exceptional threshold
- Indicates strong mineralization at surface
Negative factors
- Rock chip sample is selective and may not be representative
Evidence · text
“1.5 m averaging 4.75 g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Lolita Norte Rock Chip SampleAtakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 20.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.35 mNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Lolita Norte Rock Chip Sample
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 20.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This bonanza-grade rock chip sample indicates very high-grade gold mineralization at surface, which is a significant positive indicator.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (20.5 g/t Au)
- Indicates bonanza-grade mineralization at surface
Negative factors
- Rock chip sample is selective and may not be representative
- Very narrow width (0.35m)
Evidence · text
“0.35 m @ 20.5 g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Dos Marias Rock Chip SampleAtakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 3.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.95 mNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Dos Marias Rock Chip Sample
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.97
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade rock chip sample indicates strong gold mineralization at surface, warranting further follow-up.
Positive factors
- High gold grade (3.97 g/t Au) meets strong threshold
- Indicates strong mineralization at surface
Negative factors
- Rock chip sample is selective and may not be representative
Evidence · text
“0.95 m grading 3.97 g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Dos Marias Rock Chip SampleAtakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 4.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Dos Marias Rock Chip Sample
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade rock chip sample indicates strong gold mineralization at surface, warranting further follow-up.
Positive factors
- High gold grade (4.52 g/t Au) approaching exceptional threshold
- Indicates strong mineralization at surface
Negative factors
- Rock chip sample is selective and may not be representative
Evidence · text
“0.90 m grading 4.52 g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Cerro Sur Rock Chip SampleAtakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 29.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Cerro Sur Rock Chip Sample
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 29.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This bonanza-grade rock chip sample indicates very high-grade gold mineralization at surface, which is a significant positive indicator.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (29.72 g/t Au)
- Indicates bonanza-grade mineralization at surface
Negative factors
- Rock chip sample is selective and may not be representative
- Very narrow width (0.45m)
Evidence · text
“0.45 m grading 29.72 g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
Cerro Sur Rock Chip SampleAtakama Gold Project · goldGrade: 10.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Cerro Sur Rock Chip Sample
- Project
- Atakama Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chile
- Reported Region
- Atacama Region of Chile
- Ticker
- GRG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.81
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratory and Andes Analytical Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This bonanza-grade rock chip sample indicates very high-grade gold mineralization at surface, which is a significant positive indicator.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (10.81 g/t Au)
- Indicates bonanza-grade mineralization at surface
Negative factors
- Rock chip sample is selective and may not be representative
Evidence · text
“1.7 m grading 10.81 g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At the same time, we continue to evaluate additional concessions and opportunities that could strengthen the scale and p"
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.