# Goldsky Announces MOU with Ocean Partners to Further Study Cobalt Recovery from the Rajapalot Project in Finland

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/goldsky-announces-mou-with-ocean-partners-to-further-study-cobalt-recovery-from--c2f5bfee-70a1-4b04-a415-2fd3e549ea2f

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/GSKR/news/8584302291154642/goldsky-announces-mou-with-ocean-partners-to-further-study-cobalt-recovery-from-

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2026-07-08T12:00:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Goldsky Resources Corp

- Ticker: GSKR

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Finland

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: Cobalt

- Document categories: Resource update, Agreement transaction, Metallurgy

- Extracted: 2026-09-18 02:38:04 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.40 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Goldsky Resources Corp has signed a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding with Ocean Partners to study the technical and economic viability of cobalt recovery at the Rajapalot project in Finland. The cooperation aims to evaluate metallurgical flowsheets and potential commercial arrangements for cobalt concentrate.

Reasoning: The company has entered a non-binding MOU to explore the technical and economic viability of cobalt recovery, which could add a strategic critical metal dimension to the Rajapalot project.

- Positive factor: Strategic MOU to investigate cobalt recovery

- Positive factor: Potential to qualify as a critical metal producer under EU Act

- Positive factor: Shared cost structure for phase 1 development

- Negative factor: MOU is non-binding

Facts used in scoring: 2

## Classification and evidence

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Story-specific tag

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: The MOU focuses on investigating cobalt recovery at the Rajapalot project.

Evidence · text

> investigate the technical and economic viability of recovering cobalt from Goldsky's Rajapalot gold-cobalt Project in Finland

**Mill Route**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\).

Why it applies: the document describes a flotation route \("concentrate"\)

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (2)

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/goldsky-announces-mou-with-ocean-partners-to-further-study-cobalt-recovery-from--c2f5bfee-70a1-4b04-a415-2fd3e549ea2f#fact-resource-facts-0)

Rajapalot · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Rajapalot
- Commodity: gold
- Region: finland
- Reported Region: Finland
- Ticker: GSKR

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2023-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Christopher Bray Beng, Ove Klaver, Eemeli Rantala, Craig Brown, Mathieu Gosselin
- Resource group id: resource:f8a7dc7aec502b7a6ec7

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 9780000
- Grade: 2.8
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 867
- Contained Unit: koz

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2023-12-19

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2023-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical inferred resource stated in the company description section.

Evidence · text

> Rajapalot gold cobalt project situated in northern Finland, which has an Inferred Resource of 9,780kt containing 867 koz Au @ 2.8 g/t Au

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.6 years before this release

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/goldsky-announces-mou-with-ocean-partners-to-further-study-cobalt-recovery-from--c2f5bfee-70a1-4b04-a415-2fd3e549ea2f#fact-resource-facts-1)

Rajapalot · cobalt

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Rajapalot
- Commodity: cobalt
- Region: finland
- Reported Region: Finland
- Ticker: GSKR

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2023-12-19T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Christopher Bray Beng, Ove Klaver, Eemeli Rantala, Craig Brown, Mathieu Gosselin
- Resource group id: resource:f8a7dc7aec502b7a6ec7

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 9780000
- Grade: 441
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Contained Metal: 4.3
- Contained Unit: kt

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2023-12-19

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2023-12-19T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical inferred resource stated in the company description section.

Evidence · text

> 9,780kt containing 867 koz Au @ 2.8 g/t Au &amp; 4.3 kt Co @ 441 ppm Co

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.6 years before this release

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
